pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2509.19445 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-23 · ✦ hep-ph

Study of Form Factors and Observables in B_c^- rightarrow bar{D}^{(*)0}ell^-bar{ν}_{ell} and B_c^- rightarrow D^{(*)-}ell^+ell^- decays

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 14:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph PACS 13.20.He12.39.St14.40.Nd
keywords B_c meson decaysform factorsperturbative QCDheavy quark symmetryangular observableslepton flavor violationStandard Model predictionsrare decays
0
0 comments X

The pith

The paper computes Standard Model predictions for branching fractions and angular observables in B_c decays to D mesons using perturbative QCD form factors and lattice inputs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper calculates form factors for the semileptonic decays B_c^- to anti-D^(*)0 and the rare decays B_c^- to D^(*)- ell^+ ell^- within the Standard Model. It extracts meson wave function shape parameters from lattice QCD results for related transitions and applies heavy quark spin symmetry to determine the q^2 dependence of the B_c to D^* form factors. The work then delivers numerical predictions for branching fractions, lepton flavor violating observables, and a full angular analysis of the cascade decay B_c^- to D^*-(to D^0 pi^-) ell^+ ell^-, supplying expected values for several angular coefficients under Standard Model assumptions.

Core claim

Using perturbative QCD to model the wave functions of the B_c and D^(*) mesons together with lattice inputs for B to D^(*) and B_c to D transitions, the calculation determines the relevant form factors and their q^2 dependence via heavy quark spin symmetry; these form factors are then inserted into the decay amplitudes to obtain concrete Standard Model predictions for branching fractions, lepton-flavor-violating ratios, and the full set of angular observables in the four-body cascade decay.

What carries the argument

Perturbative QCD form factors whose shape parameters are fixed by lattice QCD inputs for related transitions, with q^2 dependence of the B_c to D^* form factors supplied by heavy quark spin symmetry.

If this is right

  • The computed branching fractions set a baseline that any observation of lepton flavor violation in these channels must exceed.
  • The angular observables provide additional handles that experiments can use to test the Standard Model in the presence of new physics contributions.
  • The same form-factor framework can be reused for related decays of the B_c meson once more lattice data become available.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the predicted angular distributions are measured, they could be combined with similar observables from B meson decays to test the consistency of heavy quark symmetry assumptions across different systems.
  • Discrepancies between these predictions and future LHCb or Belle II data would point toward specific new physics operators that modify the b to c or b to u transitions.
  • The lattice-constrained wave functions could be applied to estimate non-factorizable effects in other rare B_c decays not covered here.

Load-bearing premise

The q^2 dependence of the B_c to D^* form factors can be obtained reliably by applying heavy quark spin symmetry to the B_c to D form factors taken from lattice calculations.

What would settle it

A precision measurement of the branching fraction for B_c^- to D^- mu^+ mu^- or of one of the angular coefficients in the cascade decay that lies significantly outside the reported Standard Model range would falsify the central predictions.

read the original abstract

We investigate the decays $B_c^- \rightarrow \bar{D}^{(*)0}\ell^-\bar{\nu}_{\ell}$ and $B_c^- \rightarrow D^{(*)-}\ell^+\ell^-$ within the Standard Model (SM), employing perturbative QCD (pQCD) form factors that are sensitive to the wave functions of $B_c$ and $D^{(*)}$ mesons. Using lattice QCD inputs for $B \to D^{(*)}$ and $B_c \to D$ transitions, we extract the shape parameters of the meson wave functions and estimate the $q^2$-dependence of $B_c \to D^*$ form factors via heavy quark spin symmetry. We present predictions for branching fractions, lepton flavor violating observables, and perform a detailed angular analysis of the cascade decay $B_{c}^{-} \to D^{*-}(\to D^{0}\pi^{-}) \ell^+\ell^-$, providing SM expectations for several angular observables.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper computes form factors for the decays B_c^- → D̄^{(*)0} ℓ^- ν̄_ℓ and B_c^- → D^{(*)-} ℓ^+ ℓ^- in the Standard Model using perturbative QCD, with meson wave-function shape parameters fixed from lattice QCD results on B → D^{(*)} and B_c → D transitions. It applies heavy quark spin symmetry to estimate the q^2 dependence of the B_c → D^* form factors, then derives predictions for branching fractions, lepton-flavor-violating observables, and a full angular analysis of the cascade B_c^- → D^{*-}(→ D^0 π^-) ℓ^+ ℓ^-.

Significance. If the form-factor inputs are reliable, the work supplies concrete SM benchmarks for branching ratios and angular coefficients that can be tested at LHCb or future facilities. The combination of pQCD with external lattice constraints on related channels is a methodological strength, and the detailed angular analysis of the cascade decay adds experimental utility beyond rate predictions alone.

major comments (1)
  1. [form-factor section (estimation of B_c → D^* form factors via HQSS)] The central predictions for the B_c → D^* ℓ^+ ℓ^- observables, including the angular coefficients in the cascade decay, rest on the q^2-dependent form factors obtained by applying heavy quark spin symmetry to the lattice-constrained B_c → D results. No quantitative estimate of 1/m_c or recoil corrections is provided, despite the large recoil and m_c ≈ 1.5 GeV regime where HQSS is expected to receive sizable corrections. This directly impacts the reliability of the reported SM expectations for the angular observables.
minor comments (2)
  1. [parameter extraction] Clarify in the text how the extracted shape parameters from B → D^{(*)} and B_c → D are combined and whether any tension between the two lattice sets is propagated into the final uncertainties.
  2. [results section] Add a brief comparison of the obtained B_c → D form factors with existing literature results to help readers assess consistency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below and outline the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [form-factor section (estimation of B_c → D^* form factors via HQSS)] The central predictions for the B_c → D^* ℓ^+ ℓ^- observables, including the angular coefficients in the cascade decay, rest on the q^2-dependent form factors obtained by applying heavy quark spin symmetry to the lattice-constrained B_c → D results. No quantitative estimate of 1/m_c or recoil corrections is provided, despite the large recoil and m_c ≈ 1.5 GeV regime where HQSS is expected to receive sizable corrections. This directly impacts the reliability of the reported SM expectations for the angular observables.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The use of heavy quark spin symmetry to obtain the q^2 dependence of the B_c → D^* form factors from the lattice-constrained B_c → D results is indeed an approximation whose validity is limited by the charm-quark mass and the large recoil. In the original manuscript we did not supply a quantitative estimate of the associated 1/m_c and recoil corrections. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph in the form-factor section that (i) recalls the size of analogous corrections observed in B → D^* transitions, (ii) provides a conservative uncertainty band for the B_c → D^* form factors, and (iii) propagates this uncertainty into the angular observables of the cascade decay. This addition will make the limitations of the present approach explicit while preserving the utility of the SM benchmarks we report. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: external lattice inputs and HQSS applied to new channels

full rationale

The derivation extracts meson wave-function shape parameters from independent lattice QCD calculations on B → D^{(*)} and B_c → D transitions, then applies heavy quark spin symmetry to generate q^2 dependence for the B_c → D^* form factors used in the new decay channels. These steps rely on external data and a standard symmetry relation rather than fitting parameters to the target observables or renaming fitted quantities as predictions. The central predictions for branching fractions, LFV observables, and angular coefficients therefore remain independent of the paper's own outputs and do not reduce to the inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central results rest on applicability of pQCD to these transitions, validity of heavy quark spin symmetry for relating form factors, and accuracy of lattice inputs for shape parameters; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • meson wave function shape parameters
    Extracted from lattice QCD inputs for B → D(*) and B_c → D transitions to determine the q^2 dependence of the form factors.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Heavy quark spin symmetry relates the form factors for B_c → D and B_c → D* transitions sufficiently well to estimate the q^2 dependence.
    Invoked explicitly to extend lattice results on B_c → D to the D* case.
  • domain assumption Perturbative QCD factorization applies to the B_c → D(*) transitions at the relevant energy scales.
    Basis for computing the form factors from meson wave functions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5734 in / 1560 out tokens · 49557 ms · 2026-05-18T14:22:24.967675+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Weak Annihilation Contribution to Angular Observables in $B_{c}^+\to D^{\ast+}\ell^{+}\ell^{-}$ Decays

    hep-ph 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Weak annihilation contributions are sizable in B_c^+ to D^{*+} lepton pair decays and must be included to obtain reliable Standard Model predictions for angular observables.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 37 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B Physics at LHCb

    M. Pepe Altarelli and F. Teubert,BPhysics at LHCb,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A23(2008) 5117 [0802.1901]

  2. [2]

    Dey and S

    U. Dey and S. Nandi,Correlated study on some B c→P and Bc→S wave channels in light of new inputs,JHEP07(2025) 144 [2503.01693]. [4]CDFcollaboration,Search for the flavor-changing neutral current decaysB + →µ +µ−K + andB 0 →µ +µ−K ∗0,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 3378 [hep-ex/9905004]. [5]Bellecollaboration,Observation of the decayB→Kℓ +ℓ−,Phys. Rev. Lett.88(20...

  3. [3]

    Analysis of the Rare $B_c \to D_{s,d}^{*} l^+ l^-$ Decays in QCD

    K. Azizi, F. Falahati, V. Bashiry and S.M. Zebarjad,Analysis of the Rare B(c) —>D*(s,d) l+ l- Decays in QCD,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 114024 [0806.0583]

  4. [4]

    Exclusive Decays and Lifetime of B_c Meson in QCD sum rules

    V.V. Kiselev,Exclusive decays and lifetime ofB c meson in QCD sum rules,hep-ph/0211021

  5. [5]

    Study of Rare $B_c^+\to D_{d,s}^{(*) +}l\bar{l}$ Decays

    C.Q. Geng, C.-W. Hwang and C.C. Liu,Study of rareB + c →D d,s + lepton anti-lepton decays,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 094037 [hep-ph/0110376]

  6. [6]

    $B \to D^{(*)}$ form factors in perturbative QCD

    T. Kurimoto, H.-n. Li and A.I. Sanda,B —>D(*) form-factors in perturbative QCD,Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 054028 [hep-ph/0210289]

  7. [7]

    The $B(B_s)\to D_{(s)} P$, $D_{(s)} V$, $D_{(s)}^{*}P$ and $D_{(s)}^{*}V$ decays in the perturbative QCD approach

    R.-H. Li, C.-D. Lu and H. Zou,The B(B(s)) —>D(s) P, D(s) V, D*(s) P and D*(s) V decays in the perturbative QCD approach,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 014018 [0803.1073]

  8. [8]

    Hu, S.-P

    X.-Q. Hu, S.-P. Jin and Z.-J. Xiao,Semileptonic decaysB/B s →(D (∗), D(∗) s )lνl in the PQCD approach with the lattice QCD input,Chin. Phys. C44(2020) 053102 [1912.03981]

  9. [9]

    S-wave ground state charmonium decays of $B_c$ mesons in the perturbative QCD approach

    Z. Rui and Z.-T. Zou,S-wave ground state charmonium decays ofB c mesons in the perturbative QCD approach,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 114030 [1407.5550]

  10. [10]

    Probing the $P$-wave charmonium decays of $B_c$ meson

    Z. Rui,Probing theP-wave charmonium decays ofB c meson,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 033001 [1712.08928]

  11. [11]

    Z. Rui, J. Zhang and L.-L. Zhang,Semileptonic decays ofB c meson toP-wave charmonium states,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 033007 [1806.00796]

  12. [12]

    Semileptonic decays $B_c\to(\eta_c,J/\Psi)l\nu$ in the perturbative QCD approach

    W.-F. Wang, Y.-Y. Fan and Z.-J. Xiao,Semileptonic decaysB c →(η c, J/Ψ)lνin the perturbative QCD approach,Chin. Phys. C37(2013) 093102 [1212.5903]

  13. [13]

    W.-F. Wang, X. Yu, C.-D. Lü and Z.-J. Xiao,Semileptonic decaysB + c →D (∗) (s)(l+νl, l+l−, νν) in the perturbative qcd approach,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 094018

  14. [14]

    Hu, S.-P

    X.-Q. Hu, S.-P. Jin and Z.-J. Xiao,Semileptonic decaysB c →(η c, J/ψ)l¯νl in the ”PQCD + Lattice” approach,Chin. Phys. C44(2020) 023104 [1904.07530]

  15. [15]

    Liu, H.-n

    X. Liu, H.-n. Li and Z.-J. Xiao,Improved perturbative qcd formalism forB c meson decays, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 113001

  16. [16]

    The semileptonic decays $B/B_s \to (\pi, K)(l^+l^-,l\nu,\nu\bar{\nu})$ in the perturbative QCD approach beyond the leading-order

    W.-F. Wang and Z.-J. Xiao,The semileptonic decaysB/B s →(π, K)(ℓ +ℓ−, ℓν, ν¯ν)in the perturbative QCD approach beyond the leading-order,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 114025 [1207.0265]

  17. [17]

    Testing leptoquark models in $\bar B \to D^{(*)} \tau \bar\nu$

    Y. Sakaki, M. Tanaka, A. Tayduganov and R. Watanabe,Testing leptoquark models in ¯B→D (∗)τ¯ν,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 094012 [1309.0301]

  18. [18]

    Biswas and S

    A. Biswas and S. Nandi,A closer look at observables from exclusive semileptonic B→(π, ρ)ℓν ℓ decays,JHEP09(2021) 127 [2105.01732]

  19. [19]

    $B_s\to f_0(980)$ form factors and $B_s$ decays into $f_0(980)$

    P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio and W. Wang,B s →f 0(980)form factors andB s decays into f0(980),Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 074001 [1002.2880]

  20. [20]

    A. Ali, P. Ball, L.T. Handoko and G. Hiller,A Comparative study of the decaysB→(K, K ∗)ℓ+ℓ− in standard model and supersymmetric theories,Phys. Rev. D61(2000) 074024 [hep-ph/9910221]

  21. [21]

    Weak Decays Beyond Leading Logarithms

    G. Buchalla, A.J. Buras and M.E. Lautenbacher,Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys.68(1996) 1125 [hep-ph/9512380]

  22. [22]

    Fourth generation effects on the rare $B\to K^{*}\nu\bar{\nu}$ decay

    T. Barakat,Fourth generation effects on the rare B —>K* neutrino anti-neutrino decay, New J. Phys.4(2002) 25 [hep-ph/0105116]. – 49 –

  23. [23]

    Symmetries and Asymmetries of B -> K* mu+ mu- Decays in the Standard Model and Beyond

    W. Altmannshofer, P. Ball, A. Bharucha, A.J. Buras, D.M. Straub and M. Wick,Symmetries and Asymmetries ofB→K ∗µ+µ− Decays in the Standard Model and Beyond,JHEP01 (2009) 019 [0811.1214]

  24. [24]

    Li and X

    Y.-S. Li and X. Liu,Angular distribution of the FCNC process Bc→Ds*(→Dsπ)ℓ+ℓ-,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 093005 [2309.08191]. [42]BESIIIcollaboration,Precision measurement of theD ∗0 decay branching fractions,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 031101 [1412.4566]

  25. [25]

    Baryonic Rare Decays of $\Lambda_b\to \Lambda \ell^+\ell^-$

    C.-H. Chen and C.Q. Geng,Baryonic rare decays of Lambda(b) —>Lambda lepton+ lepton-,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 074001 [hep-ph/0106193]

  26. [26]

    N.R. Soni, A. Issadykov, A.N. Gadaria, J.J. Patel and J.N. Pandya,Rareb→ddecays in covariant confined quark model,Eur. Phys. J. A58(2022) 39 [2008.07202]

  27. [27]

    Jin, X.-Q

    S.-P. Jin, X.-Q. Hu and Z.-J. Xiao,Study ofB s →K (∗)ℓ+ℓ− decays in the PQCD factorization approach with lattice QCD input,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 013001 [2003.12226]

  28. [28]

    Study of semileptonic decays $B \to \pi l^+ l^-$ and $B \to \rho l^+ l^-$ in non-universal Z' model

    P. Nayek, P. Maji and S. Sahoo,Study of semileptonic decaysB→πl +l− andB→ρl +l− in nonuniversal Z’ model,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 013005 [1811.09991]. [47]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of Particle Physics,PTEP2022(2022) 083C01

  29. [29]

    Biswas, S

    A. Biswas, S. Nandi, S.K. Patra and I. Ray,Study of the b→dℓℓtransitions in the Standard Model and test of New Physics sensitivities,JHEP03(2023) 247 [2208.14463]

  30. [30]

    Complete Anatomy of B -> K*ll and its angular distribution

    J. Matias, F. Mescia, M. Ramon and J. Virto,Complete Anatomy of ¯Bd−> ¯K ∗0(−> Kπ)l +l− and its angular distribution,JHEP04(2012) 104 [1202.4266]

  31. [31]

    Optimizing the basis of B->K*ll observables in the full kinematic range

    S. Descotes-Genon, T. Hurth, J. Matias and J. Virto,Optimizing the basis ofB→K ∗ll observables in the full kinematic range,JHEP05(2013) 137 [1303.5794]

  32. [32]

    Leading-power contributions to $B\to\pi,\rho$ transition form factors

    T. Kurimoto, H.-n. Li and A.I. Sanda,Leading power contributions to B —>pi, rho transition form-factors,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 014007 [hep-ph/0105003]

  33. [33]

    QCD Sum Rule Analysis of the Decays $B \to K \ell^+ \ell^-$ and $B \to K^* \ell^+ \ell^-$

    P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, P. Santorelli and E. Scrimieri,QCD sum rule analysis of the decaysB→Kℓ +ℓ− andB→K ∗ℓ+ℓ−,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 3672 [hep-ph/9510403]

  34. [34]

    Perturbative QCD Analysis of $B$ Meson Decays

    H.-n. Li and H.-L. Yu,Perturbative QCD analysis of B meson decays,Phys. Rev. D53 (1996) 2480 [hep-ph/9411308]

  35. [35]

    Threshold resummation for exclusive B meson decays

    H.-n. Li,Threshold resummation for exclusive B meson decays,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 094010 [hep-ph/0102013]

  36. [36]

    $k_T$ factorization of exclusive processes

    M. Nagashima and H.-n. Li,k(T) factorization of exclusive processes,Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 034001 [hep-ph/0210173]

  37. [37]

    Z. Rui, H. Li, G.-x. Wang and Y. Xiao,Semileptonic decays ofB c meson to S-wave charmonium states in the perturbative QCD approach,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 564 [1602.08918]

  38. [38]

    Determination of heavy-meson wave functions from B decays

    H.-n. Li and B. Melic,Determination of heavy meson wave functions from B decays,Eur. Phys. J. C11(1999) 695 [hep-ph/9902205]

  39. [39]

    Revisiting the pure annihilation decays $B_s\to \pi^+ \pi^-$ and $B^0 \to K^+ K^-$: the data and the pQCD predictions

    Z.-J. Xiao, W.-F. Wang and Y.-y. Fan,Revisiting the pure annihilation decaysB s →π +π− andB 0 →K +K −: the data and the pQCD predictions,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 094003 [1111.6264]. – 50 –

  40. [40]

    Heavy meson masses and decay constants from relativistic heavy quarks in full lattice QCD

    C. McNeile, C.T.H. Davies, E. Follana, K. Hornbostel and G.P. Lepage,Heavy meson masses and decay constants from relativistic heavy quarks in full lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 074503 [1207.0994]. [60]ETMcollaboration,Masses and decay constants of D* (s) and B*(s) mesons with Nf = 2 + 1 + 1twisted mass fermions,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 034524 [1707.04529]...

  41. [41]

    Model-independent description of $B\to \pi l\nu$ decays and a determination of $|V_{ub}|$

    C. Bourrely, I. Caprini and L. Lellouch,Model-independent description of B —>pi l nu decays and a determination of |V(ub)|,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 013008 [0807.2722]. [63]HPQCDcollaboration,B→Dlνform factors at nonzero recoil and extraction of|V cb|, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 054510 [1505.03925]. [64]Fermilab Lattice, MILC, Fermilab Lattice, MILCcollaboration,Sem...

  42. [42]

    C.G. Boyd, B. Grinstein and R.F. Lebed,Model independent extraction of |V(cb)| using dispersion relations,Phys. Lett. B353(1995) 306 [hep-ph/9504235]

  43. [43]

    C.G. Boyd, B. Grinstein and R.F. Lebed,Model independent determinations of anti-B —> D (lepton), D* (lepton) anti-neutrino form-factors,Nucl. Phys. B461(1996) 493 [hep-ph/9508211]

  44. [44]

    C.G. Boyd, B. Grinstein and R.F. Lebed,Precision corrections to dispersive bounds on form-factors,Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 6895 [hep-ph/9705252]

  45. [45]

    Bordone, N

    M. Bordone, N. Gubernari, D. van Dyk and M. Jung,Heavy-Quark expansion for ¯Bs →D (∗) s form factors and unitarity bounds beyond theSU(3)F limit,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 347 [1912.09335]

  46. [46]

    Covariant Light-Front Approach for $B_c$ transition form factors

    W. Wang, Y.-L. Shen and C.-D. Lu,Covariant Light-Front Approach for B(c) transition form factors,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 054012 [0811.3748]

  47. [47]

    Semileptonic $B_c$ Decay and Heavy Quark Spin Symmetry

    E.E. Jenkins, M.E. Luke, A.V. Manohar and M.J. Savage,Semileptonic B(c) decay and heavy quark spin symmetry,Nucl. Phys. B390(1993) 463 [hep-ph/9204238]

  48. [48]

    Colangelo, F

    P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio and F. Loparco,Role ofB + c →B (∗) s,d ¯ℓ νℓ in the Standard Model and in the search for BSM signals,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 075019 [2102.05365]

  49. [49]

    B_{d,s}->rho, omega, K*, phi Decay Form Factors from Light-Cone Sum Rules Revisited

    P. Ball and R. Zwicky,B d,s →ρ, ω, K ∗, ϕdecay form-factors from light-cone sum rules revisited,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 014029 [hep-ph/0412079]

  50. [50]

    Ivanov, J.N

    M.A. Ivanov, J.N. Pandya, P. Santorelli and N.R. Soni,DecayB + c →D (∗)+ (s) ℓ+ℓ− within covariant confined quark model,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 096003 [2404.15085]. [74]LHCbcollaboration,Angular Analysis of theB + →K ∗+µ+µ− Decay,Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 161802 [2012.13241]. – 51 –