pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.21064 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-25 · 🧮 math.OC

Smoothing Binary Optimization: A Primal-Dual Perspective

Wenbo Liu , Akang Wang , Dun Ma , Hongyi Jiang , Jianghua Wu , Wenguo Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 14:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC
keywords binary optimizationprimal-dual frameworkminimax problemgradient descent-ascentcombinatorial optimizationsmoothing techniquesMax-CutMaxSAT
0
0 comments X

The pith

A primal-dual reformulation converts unconstrained binary optimization into a continuous minimax problem solvable by efficient gradient methods.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that binary optimization can be recast as a continuous minimax problem with a strong max-min property. The reformulation smooths the discrete nature of the problem, opening the door to gradient-based optimization techniques. A simultaneous gradient descent-ascent algorithm is introduced that runs in parallel on GPUs and converges linearly to near-optimal solutions. Experiments show it handles problems with up to 50,000 variables in Max-Cut, MaxSAT, and Maximum Independent Set much faster than existing methods.

Core claim

The central claim is that unconstrained binary optimization admits a primal-dual reformulation as a continuous minimax problem satisfying a strong max-min property. This allows smoothing of the discrete problem and application of a simultaneous gradient descent-ascent algorithm that provably converges to near-optimal points in linear time.

What carries the argument

The primal-dual framework reformulating the binary problem as a continuous minimax optimization that preserves a strong max-min property.

If this is right

  • Large combinatorial problems become solvable to high quality in seconds using standard GPU hardware.
  • Gradient-based methods extend effectively to discrete binary domains through the minimax smoothing.
  • The linear convergence rate provides theoretical guarantees for scalability.
  • Outperforms prior methods on standard benchmarks like Max-Cut and MaxSAT.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach might extend to other discrete optimization problems by finding analogous minimax reformulations.
  • The parallelizability suggests use in distributed computing environments for even larger instances.
  • Connections between game-theoretic minimax and combinatorial optimization could lead to new hybrid algorithms.

Load-bearing premise

The continuous minimax reformulation must satisfy a strong max-min property preserved by the smoothing, and the simultaneous gradient dynamics must reach a near-optimal point of the original binary problem at linear rate.

What would settle it

Solving a known small binary optimization instance exactly and verifying whether the proposed algorithm recovers a solution of comparable quality within the predicted linear number of iterations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.21064 by Akang Wang, Dun Ma, Hongyi Jiang, Jianghua Wu, Wenbo Liu, Wenguo Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An illustration of PDBO. The distinct contributions of our work are summarized as follows. • Primal-Dual Reformulation. We introduce a novel framework that reformulates unconstrained binary optimization as a continuous minimax problem, satisfying a strong max-min property. This reformulation smooths the discrete problem, enabling efficient gradient-based optimization. • GDA with Guarantees. We develop a si… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The objective value of Max-Cut, as a function of runtime. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Binary optimization is a powerful tool for modeling combinatorial problems, yet scalable and theoretically sound solution methods remain elusive. Conventional solvers often rely on heuristic strategies with weak guarantees or struggle with large-scale instances. In this work, we introduce a novel primal-dual framework that reformulates unconstrained binary optimization as a continuous minimax problem, satisfying a strong max-min property. This reformulation effectively smooths the discrete problem, enabling the application of efficient gradient-based methods. We propose a simultaneous gradient descent-ascent algorithm that is highly parallelizable on GPUs and provably converges to a near-optimal solution in linear time. Extensive experiments on large-scale problems--including Max-Cut, MaxSAT, and Maximum Independent Set with up to 50,000 variables--demonstrate that our method identifies high-quality solutions within seconds, significantly outperforming state-of-the-art alternatives.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a primal-dual framework reformulating unconstrained binary optimization as a continuous minimax problem that satisfies a strong max-min property. This smoothing enables a simultaneous gradient descent-ascent (GDA) algorithm that is GPU-parallelizable and is claimed to converge linearly to near-optimal solutions of the original discrete problem. Extensive experiments on Max-Cut, MaxSAT, and Maximum Independent Set instances with up to 50,000 variables are reported to show high-quality solutions in seconds, outperforming state-of-the-art methods.

Significance. If the strong max-min property and the linear-rate convergence of simultaneous GDA are rigorously established, the work would offer a theoretically grounded, scalable approach to large-scale binary optimization with practical GPU efficiency. The empirical scale (tens of thousands of variables) and direct comparison to existing solvers would constitute a meaningful contribution to continuous relaxations of combinatorial problems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Convergence analysis / Theorem on linear rate] The linear convergence claim for simultaneous GDA (abstract and convergence theorem) requires strong convexity-concavity of the smoothed minimax problem, yet the reformulation via continuous relaxation or penalty for general binary objectives (e.g., quadratic Max-Cut) typically yields only convex-concave structure with zero strong-convexity modulus. Standard GDA theory then guarantees at best sublinear rates or possible oscillations, contradicting the asserted linear time convergence to a near-optimal point of the original problem.
  2. [Reformulation section / Max-min property statement] The strong max-min property is asserted to be preserved under the chosen smoothing, but no explicit error bound or modulus analysis is provided showing that the continuous saddle point remains within a controllable distance of the discrete optimum independently of instance size or conditioning. This gap directly affects the claim that the GDA trajectory solves the original binary problem to high quality.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Method description] Notation for the smoothing parameter and its dependence on problem dimension should be clarified to allow readers to verify independence from instance size.
  2. [Experiments] The experimental section would benefit from reporting the duality gap or distance to the discrete optimum in addition to objective value, to directly support the 'near-optimal' claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and thoughtful review of our manuscript. We address the major comments below and outline the revisions we plan to make to strengthen the theoretical foundations of our work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Convergence analysis / Theorem on linear rate] The linear convergence claim for simultaneous GDA (abstract and convergence theorem) requires strong convexity-concavity of the smoothed minimax problem, yet the reformulation via continuous relaxation or penalty for general binary objectives (e.g., quadratic Max-Cut) typically yields only convex-concave structure with zero strong-convexity modulus. Standard GDA theory then guarantees at best sublinear rates or possible oscillations, contradicting the asserted linear time convergence to a near-optimal point of the original problem.

    Authors: We thank the referee for pointing out this important aspect of the convergence analysis. In our reformulation, the primal-dual smoothing is designed such that the resulting minimax problem is strongly convex-concave with a modulus that can be explicitly bounded away from zero for a fixed smoothing parameter. We will revise the convergence theorem to include the explicit dependence of the linear convergence rate on this strong convexity-concavity modulus and clarify the choice of step sizes to ensure linear convergence without oscillations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Reformulation section / Max-min property statement] The strong max-min property is asserted to be preserved under the chosen smoothing, but no explicit error bound or modulus analysis is provided showing that the continuous saddle point remains within a controllable distance of the discrete optimum independently of instance size or conditioning. This gap directly affects the claim that the GDA trajectory solves the original binary problem to high quality.

    Authors: We agree that providing an explicit error bound would strengthen the connection between the continuous saddle point and the discrete optimum. We will add a new proposition in the reformulation section that derives such a bound, showing that the optimality gap is controlled by the smoothing parameter and remains independent of the problem size for problems with bounded conditioning. This will be supported by a detailed modulus analysis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: reformulation and convergence claims are independently derived

full rationale

The paper introduces a primal-dual reformulation of unconstrained binary optimization into a continuous minimax problem claimed to satisfy a strong max-min property, then derives a simultaneous GDA algorithm with linear convergence to near-optimal solutions. No load-bearing step reduces these claims to self-definition, fitted inputs relabeled as predictions, or self-citation chains. The strong max-min property is asserted as a consequence of the novel reformulation rather than presupposed, and the linear-rate guarantee is presented as a separate provable result. The derivation chain remains self-contained against standard optimization theory without tautological reduction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The central claims rest on an unshown mathematical property (strong max-min) and an unshown convergence proof.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5680 in / 1254 out tokens · 50584 ms · 2026-05-18T14:05:23.315362+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alleviating the quantum big-m problem

    Edoardo Alessandroni, Sergi Ramos-Calderer, Ingo Roth, Emiliano Traversi, and Leandro Aolita. Alleviating the quantum big-m problem. npj Quantum Information, 11 0 (1): 0 125, 2025

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Maximum satisfiability

    Fahiem Bacchus, Matti J \"a rvisalo, and Ruben Martins. Maximum satisfiability. In Handbook of satisfiability, pp.\ 929--991. IOS Press, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Experiments in quadratic 0--1 programming

    Francisco Barahona, Michael J \"u nger, and Gerhard Reinelt. Experiments in quadratic 0--1 programming. Mathematical programming, 44 0 (1): 0 127--137, 1989

    work page 1989

  4. [4]

    The hard-core model on random graphs revisited

    Jean Barbier, Florent Krzakala, Lenka Zdeborov \'a , and Pan Zhang. The hard-core model on random graphs revisited. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 473, pp.\ 012021. IOP Publishing, 2013

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Simulated annealing

    Dimitris Bertsimas and John Tsitsiklis. Simulated annealing. Statistical science, 8 0 (1): 0 10--15, 1993

    work page 1993

  6. [6]

    The mathematics of quantum-enabled applications on the d-wave quantum computer

    Jesse J Berwald. The mathematics of quantum-enabled applications on the d-wave quantum computer. Not. Am. Math. Soc, 66 0 (832): 0 55, 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Convex optimization

    Stephen P Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe. Convex optimization. Cambridge university press, 2004

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    JAX : composable transformations of P ython+ N um P y programs, 2025

    James Bradbury, Roy Frostig, Peter Hawkins, Matthew James Johnson, Chris Leary, Dougal Maclaurin, George Necula, Adam Paszke, Jake Vander P las, Skye Wanderman- M ilne, and Qiao Zhang. JAX : composable transformations of P ython+ N um P y programs, 2025

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Controlling continuous relaxation for combinatorial optimization

    Yuma Ichikawa. Controlling continuous relaxation for combinatorial optimization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37: 0 47189--47216, 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Erdos goes neural: an unsupervised learning framework for combinatorial optimization on graphs

    Nikolaos Karalias and Andreas Loukas. Erdos goes neural: an unsupervised learning framework for combinatorial optimization on graphs. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33: 0 6659--6672, 2020

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Ising formulations of many np problems

    Andrew Lucas. Ising formulations of many np problems. Frontiers in physics, 2: 0 5, 2014

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Genetic algorithms for binary quadratic programming

    Peter Merz and Bernd Freisleben. Genetic algorithms for binary quadratic programming. In Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference, volume 1, pp.\ 417--424. Morgan Kaufmann Orlando, FL, 1999

    work page 1999

  13. [13]

    Diverse adaptive bulk search: a framework for solving qubo problems on multiple gpus

    Koji Nakano, Daisuke Takafuji, Yasuaki Ito, Takashi Yazane, Junko Yano, Shiro Ozaki, Ryota Katsuki, and Rie Mori. Diverse adaptive bulk search: a framework for solving qubo problems on multiple gpus. In 2023 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW), pp.\ 314--325. IEEE, 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Iterated tabu search for the unconstrained binary quadratic optimization problem

    Gintaras Palubeckis. Iterated tabu search for the unconstrained binary quadratic optimization problem. Informatica, 17 0 (2): 0 279--296, 2006

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    Solving the max-cut problem using eigenvalues

    Svatopluk Poljak and Franz Rendl. Solving the max-cut problem using eigenvalues. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 62 0 (1-3): 0 249--278, 1995

    work page 1995

  16. [16]

    Ros: A gnn-based relax-optimize-and-sample framework for max- k -cut problems

    Yeqing Qiu, Xue Ye, Akang Wang, Yiheng Wang, Qingjiang Shi, and Zhi-Quan Luo. Ros: A gnn-based relax-optimize-and-sample framework for max- k -cut problems. In Forty-second International Conference on Machine Learning, 2025

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Faster exact solution of sparse maxcut and qubo problems

    Daniel Rehfeldt, Thorsten Koch, and Yuji Shinano. Faster exact solution of sparse maxcut and qubo problems. Mathematical Programming Computation, 15 0 (3): 0 445--470, 2023

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Combinatorial optimization with physics-inspired graph neural networks

    Martin JA Schuetz, J Kyle Brubaker, and Helmut G Katzgraber. Combinatorial optimization with physics-inspired graph neural networks. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4 0 (4): 0 367--377, 2022

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Free-energy machine for combinatorial optimization

    Zi-Song Shen, Feng Pan, Yao Wang, Yi-Ding Men, Wen-Biao Xu, Man-Hong Yung, and Pan Zhang. Free-energy machine for combinatorial optimization. Nature Computational Science, pp.\ 1--11, 2025

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    One model, any csp: Graph neural networks as fast global search heuristics for constraint satisfaction

    Jan T \"o nshoff, Berke Kisin, Jakob Lindner, and Martin Grohe. One model, any csp: Graph neural networks as fast global search heuristics for constraint satisfaction. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-23 , pp.\ 4280--4288. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organiz...

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Unsupervised learning for combinatorial optimization with principled objective relaxation

    Haoyu Peter Wang, Nan Wu, Hang Yang, Cong Hao, and Pan Li. Unsupervised learning for combinatorial optimization with principled objective relaxation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35: 0 31444--31458, 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Probabilistic grasp-tabu search algorithms for the ubqp problem

    Yang Wang, Zhipeng L \"u , Fred Glover, and Jin-Kao Hao. Probabilistic grasp-tabu search algorithms for the ubqp problem. Computers & Operations Research, 40 0 (12): 0 3100--3107, 2013

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    The gset dataset

    Yinyu Ye. The gset dataset. https://web.stanford.edu/ yyye/yyye/Gset/, 2003

    work page 2003

  24. [24]

    Benchmarking hamiltonian noise in the d-wave quantum annealer

    Tristan Zaborniak and Rog \'e rio de Sousa. Benchmarking hamiltonian noise in the d-wave quantum annealer. IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 2: 0 1--6, 2021

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION format.date year duplicate empty "emp...

    work page

  26. [26]

    @esa (Ref

    \@ifxundefined[1] #1\@undefined \@firstoftwo \@secondoftwo \@ifnum[1] #1 \@firstoftwo \@secondoftwo \@ifx[1] #1 \@firstoftwo \@secondoftwo [2] @ #1 \@temptokena #2 #1 @ \@temptokena \@ifclassloaded agu2001 natbib The agu2001 class already includes natbib coding, so you should not add it explicitly Type <Return> for now, but then later remove the command n...

    work page

  27. [27]

    \@lbibitem[] @bibitem@first@sw\@secondoftwo \@lbibitem[#1]#2 \@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@namedef br@#2 \@nameuse br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined b@#2\@extra@b@citeb @num @parse #2 @tmp #1 NAT@b@open@#2 NAT@b@shut@#2 \@ifnum @merge>\@ne @bibitem@first@sw \@firstoftwo \@ifundefined NAT@b*@#2 \@firstoftwo @num @NAT@ctr \@secondoft...

    work page

  28. [28]

    @open @close @open @close and [1] URL: #1 \@ifundefined chapter * \@mkboth \@ifxundefined @sectionbib * \@mkboth * \@mkboth\@gobbletwo \@ifclassloaded amsart * \@ifclassloaded amsbook * \@ifxundefined @heading @heading NAT@ctr thebibliography [1] @ \@biblabel @NAT@ctr \@bibsetup #1 @NAT@ctr @ @openbib .11em \@plus.33em \@minus.07em 4000 4000 `\.\@m @bibit...

    work page