Coherence and Quantum Stability of Relativistic Superfluid States

Giacomo Contri; Giordano Cintia; Lasha Berezhiani

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Coherence and Quantum Stability of Relativistic Superfluid States

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A U(1)-charged superfluid condensate remains coherent to all orders in perturbation theory.

desk verdict The central stability claim is real but partly built into the definition; the paper's value is the explicit non-Gaussian state and the Gaussian counterexample, with a genuine open question about infrared behavior in the all-orders proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.21667 v2 pith:4PJGR7MC submitted 2025-09-25 hep-th

Lasha Berezhiani , Giordano Cintia , Giacomo Contri This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-th

keywords relativisticsuperfluidscoherentstatesspontaneoussymmetrybreakingbackgroundfieldmethodquantumstabilityGoldstonetheoremU(1)chargenon-Gaussian

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a homogeneous superfluid made of a complex scalar field can survive quantum-mechanical time evolution. Unlike a condensate of a real scalar, whose constituents scatter into nonzero momentum and deplete the background, the U(1)-charged condensate studied here has protected dynamics: charge conservation blocks the number-changing channels. The authors construct the explicit quantum state for the superfluid and claim that, when defined as the interacting vacuum of the fluctuation Hamiltonian, it is stationary to all orders in perturbation theory, with every equal-time correlation function time-independent up to an overall phase. They stress that a naive coherent or squeezed state fails: specific non-Gaussian corrections are needed for stability. If correct, this removes a standard obstacle to treating dense charged scalar backgrounds, such as superfluid dark matter models, as stable semiclassical configurations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the U(1)-rotated Hamiltonian $H' = H - \mu Q$, obtained by removing the background phase with a time-dependent canonical transformation. Its ground state, the interacting vacuum of the fluctuation fields, is the superfluid state $|v\rangle$. The machinery has three parts: (i) the free vacuum of the diagonalized quadratic fluctuation Hamiltonian supplies the ladder basis and the wavefunction coefficients; (ii) the interaction-picture evolution operator $U(t_*,-\infty^-)$ dresses this vacuum with the non-Gaussian corrections required for a finite energy density and for stationarity; (iii) the recursion in the background field method, in which the interaction couplings depend only on lower-order correlators, ensures that equal-time correlation functions stay time-independent order by order. The companion symmetry statement identifies $|v\rangle$ as a spontaneous-symmetry-probing state, which is why its time evolution reduces to a rotation along the U(1) direction.

What would settle it

Compute the two-loop equal-time correlation function <v|$h^{3}$|v>, or equivalently the one-point function of Phi, using the explicit state |v> and check for residual time dependence; any nonzero contour-boundary contribution at order $lambda^{2}$ would invalidate stationarity. Alternatively, evolve the full Heisenberg equations numerically on a lattice in 3+1 dimensions with initial correlators fixed by |v> and look for a decaying amplitude or growing occupation of nonzero momentum modes; or measure the equal-time phonon spectrum at q=0 and see whether a pole appears at nonzero frequency once the cubic diagrams are included.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the state $|v\rangle$ defined as the interacting vacuum of the fluctuation Hamiltonian, $|v\rangle = U(t_*,-\infty^-)|0_{h,\pi}\rangle$, is an eigenstate of $H-\mu Q$ with eigenvalue $E_\mu$, so $e^{-iHt}|v\rangle = e^{-iE_\mu t} e^{-i\mu t Q}|v\rangle$. Because $Q$ acts as a phase rotation, every equal-time correlation function of the original field $\Phi$ evolves only by the overall U(1) phase, matching the classical background $\Phi = \frac{v}{\sqrt{2}} e^{i\mu t}$; hence coherence is preserved and the configuration tracks classical evolution indefinitely. The proof combines the background field method with a recursively defined interacting vacuum: the chemical potential $\mu$ is fixed by the stationarity condition, tadpoles are absorbed, and correlators odd in the imaginary fluctuation vanish by a $\mathbb{Z}_2$-times-time-reversal symmetry. The paper also verifies explicitly that the two-loop stationarity conditions hold and that the one-loop phonon remains gapless once cubic correlation functions cancel the anomalous average. The same counterterms that renormalize the empty theory suffice for the superfluid.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the self-consistent interacting vacuum of the fluctuation Hamiltonian exists as a normalizable state in the infinite-volume Hilbert space, and that the adiabatic construction U(t*,-infty^-)|0> converges; if the gapless Goldstone mode produces infrared obstructions, the all-orders stability conclusion does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The homogeneous U(1) superfluid background is stable to all orders in perturbation theory: no quantum break time exists for this state, and all equal-time correlators track the classical solution.
A naive coherent or squeezed coherent state is not enough: without the non-Gaussian dressing, the two-loop dynamics transfers charge from the condensate to fluctuations and the one-point function departs from the classical profile.
The quantum chemical potential is renormalized by the same counterterms as the vacuum theory, so the superfluid introduces no new ultraviolet divergences.
The Goldstone phonon remains gapless at one loop once the cubic correlation functions are included; the apparent gap of the Hartree approximation cancels.
This stability is specific to a conserved U(1) with a single charged species: adding another charged field with number-changing couplings to the condensate would reintroduce quantum depletion.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial extension: the same mechanism should protect superfluid backgrounds in any U(1)-invariant scalar theory with a stable fluctuation spectrum, including shift-symmetric single-Goldstone effective actions where the background is $\pi=\mu t$.
Editorial extension: for superfluid dark matter models that rely on a charged complex scalar, this result removes the depletion constraint on the parameter space, so stability alone does not bound the self-interaction strength.
Editorial extension: a lattice simulation initialized with the interacting-vacuum correlators, instead of free or Gaussian correlators, should show no depletion of the one-point function, providing a concrete numerical test of the all-orders claim.
Editorial extension: because the proof uses an infinite-volume adiabatic construction, finite systems or systems with boundaries could exhibit instability on timescales controlled by inverse volume or boundary effects; this limitation is not addressed by the paper.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper's main result—that the homogeneous U(1) superfluid is perturbatively stable to all orders—is real, but it is closer to a definitional consequence than the abstract suggests. The state is defined as the interacting vacuum of H – μQ, so its stationarity follows once you grant that the Gell-Mann-Low construction converges and the recursive argument in Section 2.4 goes through. That convergence is the soft spot: the lower-limit damping relies on the iϵ rotation, which is fine for modes with fixed nonzero frequency, but the gapless phonon leaves the boundary contributions controlled only if the momentum integrals are infrared finite at every loop order. The paper checks one loop, but the all-orders claim rests on an unproven assumption about higher-loop IR behavior and on the normalizability of the state in infinite volume. This is a genuine gap, though not one that invalidates the explicit computations.

What is genuinely new and good: the identification of the stable state as the interacting vacuum of fluctuations, the demonstration that this state is non-Gaussian and distinct from the Gaussian squeezed coherent state, and the two-loop counterexample showing the Gaussian choice is unstable. The one-loop chemical potential is computed explicitly and renormalized with vacuum counterterms, and the cancellation of the anomalous average via cubic correlators—restoring phonon gaplessness at one loop—is a solid, concrete result. The paper is careful and self-contained, and the citation pattern is fine: prior work by the same group and by others is cited appropriately.

The circularity burden is real but not fatal. Defining the state as the vacuum of H – μQ makes the time-independence of equal-time correlators almost tautological. What saves the paper is the work put into showing that such a state exists perturbatively, that it differs from the naive coherent state, and that the consistency conditions (39) and (40) are satisfied at leading nontrivial order. The q^{-2} remainder in Eq. (121) is left for future work, but the gaplessness argument only requires the absence of q^{-3} terms, so that is a minor loose end.

Who should read this: anyone working on coherent states, quantum break times, or superfluid dark matter. The two-loop Gaussian instability and the one-loop gap cancellation are the parts most likely to be cited. It deserves a serious referee; the referee should press on the IR convergence of the all-orders proof and on the infinite-volume normalizability of the state. I would not desk-reject this.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the quantum dynamics of a homogeneous relativistic superfluid in a complex scalar field theory with quartic self-interactions. It claims that, unlike zero-charge condensates, U(1)-charged superfluids preserve their internal coherence to all orders in perturbation theory. The central construction identifies the stable superfluid state |v> with the interacting vacuum of the fluctuation Hamiltonian H' = H - μQ, equivalently defined by the Gell-Mann-Low expression U(t*,-∞^-)|0_{h,π}>. The authors argue that this state satisfies (H - μQ)|v> = 0, so its time evolution is a pure U(1) rotation; consequently all equal-time correlators of the original field are stationary up to overall phases. They verify the one-loop renormalized chemical potential (Eq. (83)), check the stationarity conditions (39) and (40) through two-loop order, show that a Gaussian squeezed coherent state fails at two loops (Section 4.3), and demonstrate one-loop gaplessness of the phonon by showing cancellation of the anomalous-average contribution against cubic correlators (Section 5).

Significance. If the all-orders claim is correct, the result is significant: it provides a concrete example where a non-trivial, non-eigenstate quantum configuration is stable against quantum depletion, extending the quantum-break-time programme of Dvali and collaborators and clarifying the role of U(1) charge conservation. The paper contains several explicit, detailed computations: the one-loop chemical potential, the two-loop cancellation check, the Gaussian counterexample, and the one-loop gaplessness calculation. These checks are non-trivial and go substantially beyond the previous literature. The paper also gives a worthwhile conceptual discussion of the state as a Spontaneous Symmetry Probing state and as the vacuum of H - μQ. However, the central all-orders stability assertion rests on a recursive perturbative argument whose convergence and infrared behaviour are not established; this limits the strength of the conclusion that can be drawn from the verified low-order computations.

major comments (3)

[§5.5, Eq. (121)] The all-orders proof of property (i) assumes that the Gell-Mann-Low adiabatic limit defining |v> = U(t*,-∞^-)|0_{h,π}> converges and that the lower-limit boundary terms in time integrals vanish after the iϵ rotation. For the gapless phonon mode ω_-(k) = c_s k, the damping factor e^{-iω(t_z - t)} becomes unity as k→0, so the suppression of the boundary term is controlled only by the infrared behaviour of the momentum integrals. The manuscript does not analyze this infrared behaviour at arbitrary loop order; the recursive argument in Section 2.4 merely assumes that the correlators at lower orders are time-independent, which is the statement being proven. Since the entire stability conclusion follows from |v> being an eigenstate of H - μQ, an IR divergence or failure of the adiabatic construction at any loop order would invalidate Eqs. (20), (57), and (68). This is a load-bearing gap in the central claim.
[§2.4] The one-loop gaplessness check leaves an explicit q^{-2} remainder term in the phonon correlator (Eq. (121)), and the authors state that 'the exact derivation of this contribution is left for future work'. This term is not a gap, since a mass gap would appear as q^{-3}, but the text does not show that it is harmless for the spectrum beyond the leading order. Given that the gaplessness of the Goldstone mode is used in Section 2.3 to justify the convergence of the boundary terms in the all-orders stability proof, this uncomputed term represents an unresolved infrared-sensitive contribution at the one-loop level.
[§4.3] The proof of property (i) invokes the time-independence of the coefficients of the interaction Hamiltonian (48) by recursion. However, those coefficients depend on the very equal-time correlators that property (i) is meant to establish, and the manuscript explicitly acknowledges this potential tautology. The recursive argument is only sketched and does not address the existence or normalizability of the state |v> in the infinite-volume Hilbert space. This is not a fatal flaw of the low-order computations, but it means that the paper's headline claim of stability 'to all orders in perturbation theory' is not rigorously established. A more precise statement of the inductive hypothesis and a treatment of the infrared sector, even at the level of a power-counting argument, would be needed to support the all-orders conclusion.

minor comments (3)

[§2.5] In Eq. (83), the expression for μ^2_{1-loop} has an unbalanced parenthesis and the displayed formula appears to be missing the closing bracket for the factor multiplying v^2. Please check the typesetting.
[Appendix B] The phrase 'the textreme' in Appendix B (in the sentence about contributions evaluated at t_z = t') appears to be a typo for 'the extreme'. Also, the spelling 'M/oller' on page 9 should be 'Møller'.
[§2.1] The Jacobi elliptic function parametrization in Eq. (25) is introduced without a reference or definition of the argument convention; adding a brief explanation or citation would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The all-orders stationarity claim is built into the definition of |v⟩ as the interacting vacuum of H−μQ; the construction is explicit and loop-checked, but the central 'prediction' reduces by construction.

self definitional [Section 3, around Eq. (68), with the state defined in Eqs. (57)–(58) and the chemical potential fixed by Eq. (39).]
"This modified Hamiltonian H˜ exactly coincides with (47)-(48). Therefore, since the state |v⟩ is the ground state of (47)-(48) by construction, it satisfies the relation (68)."

The state |v⟩ is defined in Eq. (57) as the interacting vacuum of the fluctuation Hamiltonian H' = H−μQ. Being the ground state of a time-independent H' already means H'|v⟩ = E|v⟩, i.e., Eq. (68). Equation (20) and the time-independence of all equal-time correlators are then read off from (68). Thus the central all-orders stability result is the defining property of the constructed state, not an independent derivation. The parameter μ is itself fixed by the stationarity condition (39), so the Hamiltonian used to define |v⟩ is chosen to enforce the stability that is later 'proved.' The non-trivial residue—the self-consistent non-Gaussian dressing and the one/two-loop cancellations—is checked to low orders; the all-orders claim therefore reduces, in part, to the definition.

full rationale

The paper is transparent about the construction: it states that stability is achieved 'upon an appropriate definition of its state' and explicitly says the state satisfies (68) 'by construction.' Section 2.4 identifies the potential tautology in the recursive definition of the interaction-Hamiltonian coefficients and attempts to resolve it by induction: coefficients at a given loop order depend only on lower-order correlators, whose time-independence is the induction hypothesis. This recursion is a legitimate argument provided the Gell-Mann-Low limit U(t*,-∞^-)|0⟩ converges and the time integrals are controlled in the infrared. That control is not demonstrated: the phonon is gapless, and Eq. (121) explicitly leaves a q^{-2} remainder whose fate is deferred to future work. This is a rigor gap concerning convergence and normalizability, not itself a circular step. The self-citations to the authors' prior work for the claim that non-Gaussian dressing is essential are not load-bearing, because Section 4.3 independently shows that the Gaussian free vacuum |0_h,π⟩ becomes unstable at two-loop order. The independent checks—renormalized one-loop chemical potential, the explicit two-loop cancellation, and the one-loop gaplessness of the Goldstone—give the construction substantive content. However, they verify the consistency of the constructed state rather than deriving the all-orders stationarity from independent first principles; the core stability claim remains, in part, equivalent to the definition of the state as the ground state of H−μQ.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on five domain assumptions rather than fitted parameters. The only chosen background number is the condensate amplitude v, which labels the family of solutions; mu is then fixed by the stationarity condition Eq. (39). No new entities are introduced. The heaviest input is that the Gell-Mann-Low state exists and is normalizable, and that H - mu Q has a U(1)-breaking ground state in infinite volume; these are standard but not proven here. Stability is conditional on having no additional charged species, as the authors themselves note in Section 1.3.

free parameters (1)

v (condensate amplitude)
Labels the one-parameter family of homogeneous superfluid configurations; mu is then fixed by the stationarity condition Eq. (39). It is a background choice, not fitted to external data.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Gell-Mann-Low / Moller construction gives a normalizable interacting vacuum |Omega> = U(t*,-infinity^-)|0>.
Invoked in Eq. (57) to define the superfluid state; requires convergence of the adiabatic contour and absence of infrared obstruction from the gapless Goldstone mode.
domain assumption H' = H - mu Q is bounded below and admits a U(1)-breaking ground state for every mu.
Needed so that the interacting vacuum exists and spontaneously breaks the symmetry in infinite volume; not proven in the paper.
domain assumption The theory contains only one complex scalar charged under U(1); no additional species can carry away the charge.
Authors state in Section 1.3 and footnote 6 that additional charged fields would make the pure superfluid unstable; stability is conditional on this absence.
domain assumption Perturbative expansion in lambda with standard vacuum renormalization (Eq. (85)) is valid for the fluctuation sector.
All loop checks are performed order by order in lambda; the paper explicitly claims only perturbative stability.
domain assumption Infinite-volume homogeneous condensate with finite energy density; boundary terms and infrared effects of massless phonons are negligible.
The paper works in infinite volume and uses momentum-space mode expansions; global charge is defined up to volume factors.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coherence and Quantum Stability of Relativistic Superfluid States." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4PJGR7MC

@misc{pith2026250921667,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coherence and Quantum Stability of Relativistic Superfluid States},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4PJGR7MC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.21667}
}

abstract

We analyze the quantum dynamics of a relativistic homogeneous superfluid in a complex scalar field theory. Unlike zero-charge condensates, which undergo quantum evaporation due to internal number-changing processes, we show that $U(1)$ superfluids preserve their internal coherence indefinitely in this theory. In particular, although not Hamiltonian eigenstates, these configurations are stable in the full quantum theory to all orders in perturbation theory. This is demonstrated by explicitly constructing the corresponding quantum state and studying its dynamics. Crucially, maintaining stability requires the quantum state to go beyond a naive coherent-state construction: specific non-Gaussian corrections are essential for having a stationary state. The resulting state is identified as the interacting vacuum of the superfluid fluctuations, which also serves as the ground state of the modified Hamiltonian $\hat{{H}}-\mu \hat{Q}$, with $\mu$ the full-fledged quantum chemical potential and $\hat{Q}$ the $U(1)$ charge. Finally, we check that the phonon mode remains gapless once one-loop corrections are included, confirming the robustness of the Goldstone theorem beyond the semiclassical regime, even in systems with a spontaneously broken Lorentz symmetry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.21667 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** In the background field method, tadpoles in the interacting Hamiltonian are cancelled by those arising from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Effective Field Theories for Material Media
hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

Spacetime-symmetry-breaking Goldstone EFTs systematically describe bulk and localized excitations of solids, fluids, and superfluids, with new thermodynamic identifications and corrected scattering rates.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Glauber,Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field,Phys

R.J. Glauber,Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field,Phys. Rev.131(1963) 2766

1963
[2]

Sudarshan,Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams,Phys

E.C.G. Sudarshan,Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams,Phys. Rev. Lett.10(1963) 277

1963
[3]

Kibble,Frequency Shift in High-Intensity Compton Scattering,Phys

T.W.B. Kibble,Frequency Shift in High-Intensity Compton Scattering,Phys. Rev.138 (1965) B740

work page 1965
[4]

Zhang, D.H

W.-M. Zhang, D.H. Feng and R. Gilmore,Coherent States: Theory and Some Applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.62(1990) 867

work page 1990
[5]

Zhang,Coherent states in field theory,hep-th/9908117

W.-M. Zhang,Coherent states in field theory,hep-th/9908117

arXiv
[6]

Dvali and C

G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Black Hole’s Quantum N-Portrait,Fortsch. Phys.61(2013) 742 [1112.3359]

arXiv 2013
[7]

Dvali and C

G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Black Holes as Critical Point of Quantum Phase Transition,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 2752 [1207.4059]

arXiv 2014
[8]

Dvali and C

G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Quantum Compositeness of Gravity: Black Holes, AdS and Inflation,JCAP01(2014) 023 [1312.4795]

arXiv 2014

Show all 71 references

[9]

Dvali and C

G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Quantum Exclusion of Positive Cosmological Constant?,Annalen Phys.528(2016) 68 [1412.8077]

2016 arXiv
[10]

Berezhiani,On Corpuscular Theory of Inflation,Eur

L. Berezhiani,On Corpuscular Theory of Inflation,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 106 [1610.08433]

2017 arXiv
[11]

Dvali, C

G. Dvali, C. Gomez and S. Zell,Quantum Break-Time of de Sitter,JCAP06(2017) 028 [1701.08776]

2017 arXiv
[12]

Berezhiani, G

L. Berezhiani, G. Dvali and O. Sakhelashvili,de Sitter space as a BRST invariant coherent state of gravitons,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 025022 [2111.12022]

2022 arXiv
[13]

Berezhiani, G

L. Berezhiani, G. Dvali and O. Sakhelashvili,Consistent Canonical Quantization of Gravity: Recovery of Classical GR from BRST-invariant Coherent States,2409.18777

arXiv
[14]

Dvali, D

G. Dvali, D. Flassig, C. Gomez, A. Pritzel and N. Wintergerst,Scrambling in the Black Hole Portrait,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 124041 [1307.3458]

2013 arXiv
[15]

Dvali and S

G. Dvali and S. Zell,Classicality and Quantum Break-Time for Cosmic Axions,JCAP07 (2018) 064 [1710.00835]. 45

2018 arXiv
[16]

Berezhiani and M

L. Berezhiani and M. Zantedeschi,Evolution of coherent states as quantum counterpart of classical dynamics,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 085007 [2011.11229]

2021 arXiv
[17]

Berezhiani, G

L. Berezhiani, G. Cintia and M. Zantedeschi,Background-field method and initial-time singularity for coherent states,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 045003 [2108.13235]

2022 arXiv
[18]

Dvali and L

G. Dvali and L. Eisemann,Perturbative understanding of nonperturbative processes and quantumization versus classicalization,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 125019 [2211.02618]

2022 arXiv
[19]

Berezhiani, G

L. Berezhiani, G. Cintia and M. Zantedeschi,Perturbative construction of coherent states, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 085018 [2311.18650]

2024 arXiv
[20]

Berezhiani and M

L. Berezhiani and M. Trodden,How Likely are Constituent Quanta to Initiate Inflation?, Phys. Lett. B749(2015) 425 [1504.01730]

2015 arXiv
[21]

Berezhiani and M

L. Berezhiani and M. Trodden,A relativistic gas of inflatons as an initial state for inflation, Phys. Lett. B840(2023) 137852 [2211.06222]

2023 arXiv
[22]

Dvali,A Microscopic Model of Holography: Survival by the Burden of Memory, 1810.02336

G. Dvali,A Microscopic Model of Holography: Survival by the Burden of Memory, 1810.02336

arXiv
[23]

Dvali, L

G. Dvali, L. Eisemann, M. Michel and S. Zell,Black hole metamorphosis and stabilization by memory burden,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 103523 [2006.00011]

2020 arXiv
[24]

Alexandre, G

A. Alexandre, G. Dvali and E. Koutsangelas,New mass window for primordial black holes as dark matter from the memory burden effect,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 036004 [2402.14069]

2024 arXiv
[25]

Dvali, J.S

G. Dvali, J.S. Valbuena-Berm´ udez and M. Zantedeschi,Memory burden effect in black holes and solitons: Implications for PBH,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 056029 [2405.13117]

2024 arXiv
[26]

Dvali, M

G. Dvali, M. Zantedeschi and S. Zell,Transitioning to Memory Burden: Detectable Small Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,2503.21740

arXiv
[27]

Baacke, K

J. Baacke, K. Heitmann and C. Patzold,Nonequilibrium dynamics: A Renormalized computation scheme,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 2320 [hep-th/9608006]

1997 arXiv
[28]

Baacke, K

J. Baacke, K. Heitmann and C. Patzold,On the choice of initial states in nonequilibrium dynamics,Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 6398 [hep-th/9711144]

1998 arXiv
[29]

Nicolis and F

A. Nicolis and F. Piazza,Spontaneous Symmetry Probing,JHEP06(2012) 025 [1112.5174]

2012 arXiv
[30]

Nicolis and F

A. Nicolis and F. Piazza,Implications of Relativity on Nonrelativistic Goldstone Theorems: Gapped Excitations at Finite Charge Density,Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 011602 [1204.1570]

2013 arXiv
[31]

Nicolis, R

A. Nicolis, R. Penco, F. Piazza and R.A. Rosen,More on gapped Goldstones at finite density: More gapped Goldstones,JHEP11(2013) 055 [1306.1240]

2013 arXiv
[32]

Cohen, S.R

A.G. Cohen, S.R. Coleman, H. Georgi and A. Manohar,The Evaporation ofQBalls,Nucl. Phys. B272(1986) 301. 46

1986
[33]

Achucarro, J.-O

A. Achucarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G.A. Palma and S.P. Patil,Mass hierarchies and non-decoupling in multi-scalar field dynamics,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 043502 [1005.3848]

2011 arXiv
[34]

Creminelli, M

P. Creminelli, M. Delladio, O. Janssen, A. Longo and L. Senatore,Non-analyticity of the S-matrix with spontaneously broken Lorentz invariance,JHEP06(2024) 201 [2312.08441]

2024 arXiv
[35]

L. Hui, I. Kourkoulou, A. Nicolis, A. Podo and S. Zhou,S-matrix positivity without Lorentz invariance: a case study,JHEP04(2024) 145 [2312.08440]

2024 arXiv
[36]

Bernstein and S

J. Bernstein and S. Dodelson,Relativistic bose gas,Phys. Rev. Lett.66(1991) 683

1991
[37]

Goldstone, A

J. Goldstone, A. Salam and S. Weinberg,Broken Symmetries,Phys. Rev.127(1962) 965

1962
[38]

Nielsen and S

H.B. Nielsen and S. Chadha,On How to Count Goldstone Bosons,Nucl. Phys. B105(1976) 445

1976
[39]

Guth, M.P

A.H. Guth, M.P. Hertzberg and C. Prescod-Weinstein,Do Dark Matter Axions Form a Condensate with Long-Range Correlation?,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 103513 [1412.5930]

2015 arXiv
[40]

Peskin and D.V

M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder,An Introduction to quantum field theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA (1995), 10.1201/9780429503559

1995 doi
[41]

Weinberg,Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,Phys

S. Weinberg,Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 043514 [hep-th/0506236]

2005 arXiv
[42]

Adshead, R

P. Adshead, R. Easther and E.A. Lim,Cosmology With Many Light Scalar Fields: Stochastic Inflation and Loop Corrections,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 063504 [0809.4008]

2009 arXiv
[43]

Boyanovsky, H.J

D. Boyanovsky, H.J. de Vega, R. Holman and M. Simionato,Dynamical renormalization group resummation of finite temperature infrared divergences,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 065003 [hep-ph/9809346]

1999 arXiv
[44]

Nicolis, A

A. Nicolis, A. Podo and L. Santoni,The connection between nonzero density and spontaneous symmetry breaking for interacting scalars,JHEP09(2023) 200 [2305.08896]

2023 arXiv
[45]

Baacke, D

J. Baacke, D. Boyanovsky and H.J. de Vega,Initial time singularities in nonequilibrium evolution of condensates and their resolution in the linearized approximation,Phys. Rev. D 63(2001) 045023 [hep-ph/9907337]

2001 arXiv
[46]

Kovtun and M

A. Kovtun and M. Zantedeschi,Breaking BEC,JHEP07(2020) 212 [2003.10283]

2020 arXiv
[47]

Kovtun and M

A. Kovtun and M. Zantedeschi,Breaking BEC: Quantum evolution of unstable condensates, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 085019 [2008.02187]

2022 arXiv
[48]

Cornwall, R

J.M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw and E. Tomboulis,Effective action for composite operators,Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 2428

1974
[49]

Berges,Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory,AIP Conf

J. Berges,Introduction to nonequilibrium quantum field theory,AIP Conf. Proc.739(2004) 3 [hep-ph/0409233]. 47

2004 arXiv
[50]

Bender, P.-H

M. Bender, P.-H. Heenen and P.-G. Reinhard,Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure,Rev. Mod. Phys.75(2003) 121

2003
[51]

Alford, S

M.G. Alford, S. Kumar Mallavarapu, A. Schmitt and S. Stetina,Role reversal in first and second sound in a relativistic superfluid,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 085005 [1310.5953]

2014 arXiv
[52]

Sharma, J

A. Sharma, J. Khoury and T. Lubensky,The Equation of State of Dark Matter Superfluids, JCAP05(2019) 054 [1809.08286]

2019 arXiv
[53]

Sharma, G

A. Sharma, G. Kartvelishvili and J. Khoury,Finite temperature description of an interacting Bose gas,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 045025 [2204.02423]

2022 arXiv
[54]

Pilaftsis and D

A. Pilaftsis and D. Teresi,Symmetry Improved CJT Effective Action,Nucl. Phys. B874 (2013) 594 [1305.3221]

2013 arXiv
[55]

Ivanov, F

Y.B. Ivanov, F. Riek and J. Knoll,Gapless Hartree-Fock resummation scheme for the O(N) model,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 105016 [hep-ph/0502146]

2005 arXiv
[56]

Yukalov,Representative statistical ensembles for bose systems with broken gauge symmetry,Annals of Physics323(2008) 461

V. Yukalov,Representative statistical ensembles for bose systems with broken gauge symmetry,Annals of Physics323(2008) 461

2008
[57]

Rajaraman and E.J

R. Rajaraman and E.J. Weinberg,Internal Symmetry and the Semiclassical Method in Quantum Field Theory,Phys. Rev. D11(1975) 2950

1975
[58]

Goodman,Repulsive dark matter,New Astron.5(2000) 103 [astro-ph/0003018]

J. Goodman,Repulsive dark matter,New Astron.5(2000) 103 [astro-ph/0003018]

2000 arXiv
[59]

Slepian and J

Z. Slepian and J. Goodman,Ruling Out Bosonic Repulsive Dark Matter in Thermal Equilibrium,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.427(2012) 839 [1109.3844]

2012 arXiv
[60]

Berezhiani and J

L. Berezhiani and J. Khoury,Dark Matter Superfluidity and Galactic Dynamics,Phys. Lett. B753(2016) 639 [1506.07877]

2016 arXiv
[61]

Berezhiani and J

L. Berezhiani and J. Khoury,Theory of dark matter superfluidity,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 103510 [1507.01019]

2015 arXiv
[62]

Berezhiani, G

L. Berezhiani, G. Cintia and M. Warkentin,Core fragmentation in simplest superfluid dark matter scenario,Phys. Lett. B819(2021) 136422 [2101.08117]

2021 arXiv
[63]

Berezhiani, G

L. Berezhiani, G. Cintia and J. Khoury,Thermalization, fragmentation, and tidal disruption: The complex galactic dynamics of dark matter superfluidity,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 123010 [2212.10577]

2023 arXiv
[64]

Berezhiani and J

L. Berezhiani and J. Khoury,Emergent long-range interactions in Bose-Einstein Condensates,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 076003 [1812.09332]

2019 arXiv
[65]

Berezhiani, G

L. Berezhiani, G. Cintia, V. De Luca and J. Khoury,Superfluid Dark Matter,2505.23900
[66]

Dvali, C

G. Dvali, C. Gomez, L. Gruending and T. Rug,Towards a Quantum Theory of Solitons, Nucl. Phys. B901(2015) 338 [1508.03074]. 48

2015 arXiv
[67]

Dvali, C

G. Dvali, C. Gomez and D. L¨ ust,Classical Limit of Black Hole Quantum N-Portrait and BMS Symmetry,Phys. Lett. B753(2016) 173 [1509.02114]

2016 arXiv
[68]

Berezhiani, G

L. Berezhiani, G. Dvali and O. Sakhelashvili,Coherent states in gauge theories: Topological defects and other classical configurations,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 065018 [2411.11657]

2025 arXiv
[69]

Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Oxford (2005), 10.1017/CBO9780511790553

V. Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Oxford (2005), 10.1017/CBO9780511790553

2005 doi
[70]

Creminelli, G

P. Creminelli, G. Tambalo, F. Vernizzi and V. Yingcharoenrat,Dark-Energy Instabilities induced by Gravitational Waves,JCAP05(2020) 002 [1910.14035]

2020 arXiv
[71]

Dvali,Non-Thermal Corrections to Hawking Radiation Versus the Information Paradox, Fortsch

G. Dvali,Non-Thermal Corrections to Hawking Radiation Versus the Information Paradox, Fortsch. Phys.64(2016) 106 [1509.04645]. 49

2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Glauber,Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field,Phys

R.J. Glauber,Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field,Phys. Rev.131(1963) 2766

1963

[2] [2]

Sudarshan,Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams,Phys

E.C.G. Sudarshan,Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams,Phys. Rev. Lett.10(1963) 277

1963

[3] [3]

Kibble,Frequency Shift in High-Intensity Compton Scattering,Phys

T.W.B. Kibble,Frequency Shift in High-Intensity Compton Scattering,Phys. Rev.138 (1965) B740

work page 1965

[4] [4]

Zhang, D.H

W.-M. Zhang, D.H. Feng and R. Gilmore,Coherent States: Theory and Some Applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.62(1990) 867

work page 1990

[5] [5]

Zhang,Coherent states in field theory,hep-th/9908117

W.-M. Zhang,Coherent states in field theory,hep-th/9908117

arXiv

[6] [6]

Dvali and C

G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Black Hole’s Quantum N-Portrait,Fortsch. Phys.61(2013) 742 [1112.3359]

arXiv 2013

[7] [7]

Dvali and C

G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Black Holes as Critical Point of Quantum Phase Transition,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 2752 [1207.4059]

arXiv 2014

[8] [8]

Dvali and C

G. Dvali and C. Gomez,Quantum Compositeness of Gravity: Black Holes, AdS and Inflation,JCAP01(2014) 023 [1312.4795]

arXiv 2014