pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.22398 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-26 · 🧮 math.OC

Extremal Eigenvalues of Weighted Steklov Problems

Chiu Yen Kao , Seyyed Abbas Mohammadi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 12:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC
keywords Steklov eigenvaluesboundary density optimizationbang-bang functionseigenvalue extremal problemsFréchet differentiabilitynumerical optimization algorithmLipschitz domains
0
0 comments X

The pith

Optimal boundary densities for Steklov eigenvalue extrema exist and satisfy specific structural properties under integral and pointwise constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper optimizes the kth Steklov eigenvalue with respect to a boundary density ρ on a general bounded Lipschitz domain. It proves existence of solutions to both the minimization and maximization problems when ρ is bounded above and below and has fixed total mass. Minimizers turn out to be bang-bang functions whose support may consist of several disconnected pieces, while maximizers need not be bang-bang. On disks the minimization problem has infinitely many solutions generated by rotation, and the maximization problem has infinitely many distinct solutions that are not symmetry-related. The maps from ρ to λ_k(ρ) and to 1/λ_k(ρ) are shown to be neither convex nor concave in general, so the authors introduce a Fréchet-differentiable surrogate functional to derive optimality conditions and build a numerical scheme.

Core claim

Existence of optimal densities is established for both min and max of λ_k(ρ). Minimizers are bang-bang and may have disconnected support; maximizers are not necessarily bang-bang. On circular domains infinitely many distinct minimizers arise from rotational symmetry while infinitely many distinct maximizers arise without symmetry. The objective functionals are neither convex nor concave, so a Fréchet-differentiable surrogate is introduced to obtain first-order optimality conditions and to design an efficient numerical algorithm.

What carries the argument

The weighted Steklov eigenvalue λ_k(ρ) defined by the boundary integral constraint ∫_∂Ω ρ u v dσ together with the harmonic extension of u inside Ω, optimized over densities ρ that satisfy m ≤ ρ ≤ M and ∫_∂Ω ρ dσ = constant.

If this is right

  • Classical convex-optimization methods cannot be applied directly because the maps ρ ↦ λ_k(ρ) and ρ ↦ 1/λ_k(ρ) are neither convex nor concave.
  • Minimizers on the circle are generated by arbitrary rotations of any single bang-bang density.
  • Maximization on the circle produces infinitely many geometrically distinct optimal densities unrelated by symmetry.
  • The surrogate functional permits derivation of optimality conditions even when the original objective is non-differentiable.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same surrogate approach could be used to obtain optimality conditions for other boundary-weighted spectral problems on non-smooth domains.
  • Disconnected support of minimizers suggests that optimal densities may concentrate on subsets of the boundary whose geometry is dictated by nodal sets of the eigenfunctions.
  • The observed oscillations in numerical recoveries indicate that mesh refinement or regularization may be needed when the true optimum is bang-bang.

Load-bearing premise

The domain must be bounded and Lipschitz and the admissible densities must obey fixed pointwise bounds together with a fixed integral constraint.

What would settle it

A concrete numerical or analytic example on a Lipschitz domain in which every minimizer is smooth and connected or in which a maximizer is strictly bang-bang would refute the structural claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.22398 by Chiu Yen Kao, Seyyed Abbas Mohammadi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The first eight Steklov eigenvalues λ(ρt), k = 1, · · · , 8 and their recipro￾cals 1/λk(ρt) with weight function ρt = tρ1 + (1 − t)ρ2 with α = 0.5, β = 1.5 and γ = 2π. Proposition 3.1. Fix k ≥ 1. Assume the maximization problem (8) admits two distinct maximizers ρ0, ρ1 ∈ M. Suppose λk(ρ0) is simple and set h := ρ1 − ρ0. If λ ′ k (ρ0), h ̸= 0, then λk is not concave on M. Proof. Consider the segment ρt = ρ… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The plots of several optimal ρ for maximizing λ1γ on a disk with α = 0.5.β = 1.5 and γ = 2π. We then have ρ = |f ′ (z)| = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The plots of first two eigenvalues of ρt = tρ1 + (1 − t)ρ2 for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 where ρ1 is the maximizer of λ1 with a = 0 and ρ2 is the maximizer of λ1 with a = 0.5. Next, we reformulate the maximization problem to facilitate the derivation of optimality condi￾tions. Instead of the original problem (8), we consider the modified objective (23) max ρ∈M Λk(ρ), where Λk(ρ) is defined as in Lemma 2.3. This replacemen… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The plots of optimal ρ for minimizing λkγ on a disk for k = 1 : 5 with α = 0.5, β = 1.5, and γ = 2π. The corresponding eigenfunctions and the sum of their squares are plotted to check the optimality conditions. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The plots of optimal ρ for minimizing λkγ on a disk for k = 1 : 5 with α = 0.25, β = 4, and γ = 2π. The corresponding eigenfunctions and the sum of their squares are plotted to check the optimality conditions. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The plots of optimal ρ for maximizing λkγ on a disk for k = 1 : 3 with α = 0.5, β = 1.5, and γ = 2π. The corresponding eigenfunctions and the sum of their squares are plotted to check the optimality conditions. large-scale, ill-conditioned systems. For such cases, finite element or boundary element methods may provide more robust alternatives, albeit at a higher computational cost. 7. Conclusion In this wo… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) The nonconstant maximizer of λ1γ on a disk for α = 0.5, β = 1.5, and γ = 2π. (b) The nonconstant maximizer of λ1γ on a disk for α = 0.25, β = 4, and γ = 2π. of computing optimal densities, particularly when the optimizer lacks smoothness or exhibits a disconnected structure. Our study contributes to the broader field of spectral optimization by opening up new perspec￾tives on Steklov-type problems beyo… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The plots of µk(ρt) and 1/µk(ρt) for k = 1 · · · 4, respectively. While µ1(ρt) is concave or 1/µ1(ρt) is convex, µ2(ρt) is convex, µ3(ρt) and µ4(ρt) are neither convex nor concave. and ρt = tρ1 + (1 − t)ρ2 for 0 ≤ t ≤ 1. We have ρt(x) = ( ρL := α + t(β − α) x < 1 2 , ρR := β − t(β − α) x ≥ 1 2 , The solution u with ρ = ρt is given by u(x) = ( c1 sin(√µρLx) x < 1 2 , c2 sin(√µρR(1 − x)) x ≥ 1 2 . The eigenv… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The plots of µk(ϱt) and 1/µk(ϱt) for k = 1 and k = 2, respectively. Together with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the optimization of Steklov eigenvalues with respect to a boundary density function $\rho$ on a bounded Lipschitz domain $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^N$. We investigate the minimization and maximization of $\lambda_k(\rho)$, the $k$th Steklov eigenvalue, over admissible densities satisfying pointwise bounds and a fixed integral constraint. Our analysis covers both first and higher-order eigenvalues and applies to general, not necessarily convex or simply connected, domains. We establish the existence of optimal solutions and provide structural characterizations: minimizers are bang--bang functions and may have disconnected support, while maximizers are not necessarily bang--bang. On circular domains, the minimization problem admits infinitely many minimizers generated by rotational symmetry, while the maximization problem has infinitely many distinct maximizers that are not symmetry-induced. We also show that the maps $\rho \mapsto \lambda_k(\rho)$ and $\rho \mapsto 1/\lambda_k(\rho)$ are generally neither convex nor concave, limiting the use of classical convex optimization tools. To address these challenges, we analyze the objective functional and introduce a Fr\'echet differentiable surrogate that enables the derivation of optimality conditions. We further design an efficient numerical algorithm, with experiments illustrating the difficulty of recovering optimal densities when they lack smoothness or exhibit oscillations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies extremal problems for the k-th weighted Steklov eigenvalue λ_k(ρ) on a bounded Lipschitz domain Ω ⊂ R^N, where the weight ρ belongs to an admissible set defined by pointwise bounds a ≤ ρ ≤ b and a fixed integral constraint ∫_∂Ω ρ = m. The authors prove existence of minimizers and maximizers, establish that minimizers are bang-bang (and may have disconnected support) while maximizers need not be, show that both ρ ↦ λ_k(ρ) and ρ ↦ 1/λ_k(ρ) are in general neither convex nor concave, and introduce a Fréchet-differentiable surrogate functional to derive first-order optimality conditions when λ_k has multiplicity greater than one. They also treat the circular case, where rotational symmetry produces infinitely many distinct minimizers and maximizers, and present a numerical algorithm together with experiments that illustrate recovery difficulties for non-smooth or oscillatory optima.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies concrete structural information (bang-bang minimizers, possible disconnection, non-bang-bang maximizers) for a class of Steklov optimization problems that had previously been treated mainly for k=1 or convex domains. The surrogate approach and the explicit treatment of multiplicity are technically useful for extending optimality conditions beyond the simple eigenvalue case. The observation that the maps are neither convex nor concave correctly limits the applicability of convex-relaxation techniques and motivates the surrogate construction. The numerical examples on the disk usefully demonstrate both symmetry-induced multiplicity of optima and the practical challenge of recovering bang-bang densities.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (surrogate construction and optimality conditions): the stationarity condition obtained from the Fréchet-differentiable surrogate must be shown to imply the corresponding first-order condition for the original min-max functional λ_k when the k-th eigenvalue has multiplicity >1. A limiting argument or exact equivalence between critical points of the surrogate and those of λ_k is required; without it the bang-bang characterization for minimizers rests on an unverified transfer.
  2. [Existence theorem] Theorem on existence (likely §3): the compactness argument uses boundedness in L^∞ together with the L^1 constraint and weak-* convergence; the proof should explicitly verify that the Steklov eigenvalues are continuous with respect to this topology on the admissible set, especially when the boundary is only Lipschitz.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Numerical experiments] The numerical section should specify the finite-element or boundary-element discretization used for the Steklov eigenvalue problem and the quadrature rule for the integral constraint.
  2. [Notation and preliminaries] Notation for the admissible set (a, b, m) and the surrogate parameter should be introduced once and used consistently; a short table summarizing the constants would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (surrogate construction and optimality conditions): the stationarity condition obtained from the Fréchet-differentiable surrogate must be shown to imply the corresponding first-order condition for the original min-max functional λ_k when the k-th eigenvalue has multiplicity >1. A limiting argument or exact equivalence between critical points of the surrogate and those of λ_k is required; without it the bang-bang characterization for minimizers rests on an unverified transfer.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The surrogate is designed as a differentiable approximation to handle multiplicity. In the revision we will add a rigorous limiting argument showing that stationarity conditions for the surrogate converge to the first-order optimality conditions of the original functional λ_k as the regularization parameter tends to zero, thereby justifying the transfer to the bang-bang characterization. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Existence theorem] Theorem on existence (likely §3): the compactness argument uses boundedness in L^∞ together with the L^1 constraint and weak-* convergence; the proof should explicitly verify that the Steklov eigenvalues are continuous with respect to this topology on the admissible set, especially when the boundary is only Lipschitz.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification strengthens the argument. While continuity of Steklov eigenvalues under weak-* convergence of densities on Lipschitz domains follows from standard spectral perturbation results for the boundary integral operator, we will insert a dedicated lemma or remark in the revised manuscript that directly establishes this continuity with respect to the topology used in the compactness argument. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: variational existence and surrogate-based optimality conditions are self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives existence of optimal densities via compactness arguments in the admissible set of bounded functions with fixed integral constraint, then introduces a Fréchet-differentiable surrogate solely to obtain first-order conditions when the original eigenvalue map is non-differentiable due to multiplicity. No claimed result (existence, bang-bang structure of minimizers, or non-bang-bang maximizers) is shown to reduce by construction to a fitted parameter, a self-definition, or a load-bearing self-citation; the surrogate serves as an auxiliary device whose critical points are transferred to the original problem via explicit limiting arguments within the given Lipschitz-domain setting. The analysis therefore remains independent of its inputs and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper operates within standard Sobolev and spectral theory on Lipschitz domains; the only explicit modeling choices are the pointwise bounds and integral constraint on the density, which are domain assumptions rather than new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Ω is a bounded Lipschitz domain in R^N
    Stated at the outset as the geometric setting for the Steklov problem.
  • domain assumption Admissible densities satisfy pointwise bounds and a fixed integral constraint
    Defines the admissible set over which minimization and maximization are performed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5757 in / 1388 out tokens · 39132 ms · 2026-05-18T12:05:08.640165+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Computational methods for extremal Steklov prob- lems.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 55(2):1226–1240, 2017

    Eldar Akhmetgaliyev, Chiu-Yen Kao, and Braxton Osting. Computational methods for extremal Steklov prob- lems.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 55(2):1226–1240, 2017

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Convex shape optimization for the least biharmonic Stekloveigenvalue.ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 19(2):385–403, 2013

    Pedro Ricardo Sim˜ ao Antunes and Filippo Gazzola. Convex shape optimization for the least biharmonic Stekloveigenvalue.ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 19(2):385–403, 2013

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Optimization of the Steklov-Lam´ e eigenvalues with respect to the domain.Journal of Differential Equations, 426:1–35, 2025

    Pedro RS Antunes and Beniamin Bogosel. Optimization of the Steklov-Lam´ e eigenvalues with respect to the domain.Journal of Differential Equations, 426:1–35, 2025

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    A nonlinear eigenvalue optimization problem: Optimal potential functions.Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 40:307–327, 2018

    Pedro RS Antunes, Seyyed Abbas Mohammadi, and Heinrich Voss. A nonlinear eigenvalue optimization problem: Optimal potential functions.Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 40:307–327, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2009

    Kendall Atkinson and Weimin Han.Theoretical Numerical Analysis: A Functional Analysis Framework, vol- ume 39. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Steklov eigenproblems and the representation of solutions of elliptic boundary value problems

    Giles Auchmuty. Steklov eigenproblems and the representation of solutions of elliptic boundary value problems. Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization, 25(3-4):321–348, 2005

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    Pitman Publishing, 1980

    Catherine Bandle.Isoperimetric inequalities and applications, volume 7. Pitman Publishing, 1980. 22

    work page 1980

  8. [8]

    Optimal partitions for first eigenvalues of the Laplace operator.Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 31(3):923–949, 2015

    Farid Bozorgnia. Optimal partitions for first eigenvalues of the Laplace operator.Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 31(3):923–949, 2015

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    The infinity Laplacian eigenvalue problem: reformulation and a numerical scheme.Journal of Scientific Computing, 98(2):40, 2024

    Farid Bozorgnia, Leon Bungert, and Daniel Tenbrinck. The infinity Laplacian eigenvalue problem: reformulation and a numerical scheme.Journal of Scientific Computing, 98(2):40, 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Springer, 2005

    Dorin Bucur and Giuseppe Buttazzo.Variational methods in shape optimization problems. Springer, 2005

    work page 2005

  11. [11]

    Symmetry breaking and other phenomena in the optimization of eigenvalues for composite membranes.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 214(2):315–337, 2000

    Sagun Chanillo, Daniel Grieser, Masaki Imai, Kazuhiro Kurata, and Isamu Ohnishi. Symmetry breaking and other phenomena in the optimization of eigenvalues for composite membranes.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 214(2):315–337, 2000

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    Some recent developments on the Steklov eigenvalue problem.Revista Matem´ atica Complutense, 37(1):1–161, 2024

    Bruno Colbois, Alexandre Girouard, Carolyn Gordon, and David Sher. Some recent developments on the Steklov eigenvalue problem.Revista Matem´ atica Complutense, 37(1):1–161, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Minimization of the ground state for two phase con- ductors in low contrast regime.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 72(4):1238–1259, 2012

    Carlos Conca, Antoine Laurain, and Rajesh Mahadevan. Minimization of the ground state for two phase con- ductors in low contrast regime.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 72(4):1238–1259, 2012

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    Extremal eigenvalue problems for two-phase conductors.Archive for rational mechanics and analysis, 136(2):101–118, 1996

    Steven Cox and Robert Lipton. Extremal eigenvalue problems for two-phase conductors.Archive for rational mechanics and analysis, 136(2):101–118, 1996

    work page 1996

  15. [15]

    The two phase drum with the deepest bass note.Japan journal of industrial and applied mathe- matics, 8(3):345–355, 1991

    Steven J Cox. The two phase drum with the deepest bass note.Japan journal of industrial and applied mathe- matics, 8(3):345–355, 1991

    work page 1991

  16. [16]

    Spectral optimization of inhomogeneous plates.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 61(2):852–871, 2023

    Elisa Davoli, Idriss Mazari, and Ulisse Stefanelli. Spectral optimization of inhomogeneous plates.SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 61(2):852–871, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Rearrangements and minimization of the principal eigen- value of a nonlinear Steklov problem.Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 74(16):5697–5704, 2011

    Behrouz Emamizadeh and Mohsen Zivari-Rezapour. Rearrangements and minimization of the principal eigen- value of a nonlinear Steklov problem.Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 74(16):5697–5704, 2011

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Sharp eigenvalue bounds and minimal surfaces in the ball.Inventiones mathematicae, 203(3):823–890, 2016

    Ailana Fraser and Richard Schoen. Sharp eigenvalue bounds and minimal surfaces in the ball.Inventiones mathematicae, 203(3):823–890, 2016

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    Extremal eigenvalue problems defined for certain classes of functions.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 67(1):73–81, 1977

    Shmuel Friedland. Extremal eigenvalue problems defined for certain classes of functions.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 67(1):73–81, 1977

    work page 1977

  20. [20]

    springer, 2015

    David Gilbarg and Neil S Trudinger.Elliptic partial differential equations of second order. springer, 2015

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    On the Hersch-Payne-Schiffer inequalities for Steklov eigenvalues

    Alexandre Girouard and Iosif Polterovich. On the Hersch-Payne-Schiffer inequalities for Steklov eigenvalues. Functional Analysis and its Applications, 44(2):106–117, 2010

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    Spectral geometry of the Steklov problem.Journal of Spectral Theory, 7(2):321–359, 2017

    Alexandre Girouard and Iosif Polterovich. Spectral geometry of the Steklov problem.Journal of Spectral Theory, 7(2):321–359, 2017

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Linear elliptic boundary value problems with non–smooth data: normal solvability on sobolev–campanato spaces.Mathematische Nachrichten, 225(1):39–74, 2001

    Jens A Griepentrog and Lutz Recke. Linear elliptic boundary value problems with non–smooth data: normal solvability on sobolev–campanato spaces.Mathematische Nachrichten, 225(1):39–74, 2001

    work page 2001

  24. [24]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2006

    Antoine Henrot.Extremum problems for eigenvalues of elliptic operators. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006

    work page 2006

  25. [25]

    De Gruyter Open, 2017

    Antoine Henrot.Shape optimization and spectral theory. De Gruyter Open, 2017

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    European Mathematical Society (EMS) Publishing House, Z¨ urich, Switzerland, 2018

    Antoine Henrot and Michel Pierre.Shape Variation and Optimization: A Geometrical Analysis, volume 28 of EMS Tracts in Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS) Publishing House, Z¨ urich, Switzerland, 2018

    work page 2018

  27. [27]

    Minimization of the first nonzero eigenvalue problem for two-phase conductors with Neumann boundary conditions.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 80(4):1607–1628, 2020

    Di Kang, Patrick Choi, and Chiu-Yen Kao. Minimization of the first nonzero eigenvalue problem for two-phase conductors with Neumann boundary conditions.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 80(4):1607–1628, 2020

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Maximizing band gaps in two-dimensional photonic crystals by using level set methods.Applied Physics B, 81(2):235–244, 2005

    Chiu Y Kao, Stanley Osher, and Eli Yablonovitch. Maximizing band gaps in two-dimensional photonic crystals by using level set methods.Applied Physics B, 81(2):235–244, 2005

    work page 2005

  29. [29]

    A semi-definite optimization method for maximizing the shared band gap of topological photonic crystals.Journal of Computational Physics, 521:113538, 2025

    Chiu-Yen Kao, Junshan Lin, and Braxton Osting. A semi-definite optimization method for maximizing the shared band gap of topological photonic crystals.Journal of Computational Physics, 521:113538, 2025

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Principal eigenvalue for an elliptic problem with indefinite weight on cylindrical domains.Math

    Chiu-Yen Kao, Yuan Lou, and Eiji Yanagida. Principal eigenvalue for an elliptic problem with indefinite weight on cylindrical domains.Math. Biosci. Eng, 5(2):315–335, 2008

    work page 2008

  31. [31]

    Efficient rearrangement algorithms for shape optimization on elliptic eigenvalue problems.Journal of Scientific Computing, 54(2):492–512, 2013

    Chiu-Yen Kao and Shu Su. Efficient rearrangement algorithms for shape optimization on elliptic eigenvalue problems.Journal of Scientific Computing, 54(2):492–512, 2013

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    Krein.On Certain Problems on the Maximum and Minimum of Characteristic Values and on the Lyapunov Zones of Stability

    Mark G. Krein.On Certain Problems on the Maximum and Minimum of Characteristic Values and on the Lyapunov Zones of Stability. American Mathematical Society translations. American Mathematical Society, 1955

    work page 1955

  33. [33]

    The legacy of Vladimir Andreevich Steklov.Notices of the AMS, 61(1):190, 2014

    Nikolay Kuznetsov, Tadeusz Kulczycki, M Kwa´ snicki, Alexander Nazarov, Sergey Poborchi, Iosif Polterovich, and Bart lomiej Siudeja. The legacy of Vladimir Andreevich Steklov.Notices of the AMS, 61(1):190, 2014

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    Viewing the Steklov eigenvalues of the Laplace operator as critical Neumann eigenvalues

    Pier Domenico Lamberti and Luigi Provenzano. Viewing the Steklov eigenvalues of the Laplace operator as critical Neumann eigenvalues. InCurrent trends in analysis and its applications, pages 171–178. Springer, 2015

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    American Mathematical Soc., 2001

    Elliott H Lieb and Michael Loss.Analysis, volume 14. American Mathematical Soc., 2001

    work page 2001

  36. [36]

    Springer, 2021

    Andrea Manzoni, Alfio Quarteroni, and Sandro Salsa.Optimal control of partial differential equations. Springer, 2021. 23

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Shape optimization of a weighted two-phase Dirichlet eigen- value.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 243(1):95–137, 2022

    Idriss Mazari, Gr´ egoire Nadin, and Yannick Privat. Shape optimization of a weighted two-phase Dirichlet eigen- value.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 243(1):95–137, 2022

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Qualitative analysis of optimisation problems with respect to non-constant robin coefficients.Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze, 2022

    Idriss Mazari and Yannick Privat. Qualitative analysis of optimisation problems with respect to non-constant robin coefficients.Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze, 2022

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Qualitative analysis of optimisation problems with respect to non-constant robin coefficients.ANNALI SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE-CLASSE DI SCIENZE, pages 1309–1356, 2024

    Idriss Mazari and Yannick Privat. Qualitative analysis of optimisation problems with respect to non-constant robin coefficients.ANNALI SCUOLA NORMALE SUPERIORE-CLASSE DI SCIENZE, pages 1309–1356, 2024

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Shape dependent energy optimization in quantum dots.Applied Mathematics Letters, 25(9):1240–1244, 2012

    Abbasali Mohammadi, Fariba Bahrami, and Hakimeh Mohammadpour. Shape dependent energy optimization in quantum dots.Applied Mathematics Letters, 25(9):1240–1244, 2012

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    Optimal ground state energy of two-phase conductors.Elec- tronic Journal of Differential Equations, 2014(171):1–8, 2014

    Abbasali Mohammadi and Mohsen Yousefnezhad. Optimal ground state energy of two-phase conductors.Elec- tronic Journal of Differential Equations, 2014(171):1–8, 2014

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    Extremal principal eigenvalue of the bi-Laplacian operator

    Seyyed Abbas Mohammadi and Fariba Bahrami. Extremal principal eigenvalue of the bi-Laplacian operator. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(3):2291–2300, 2016

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    Optimal shape design for the p-Laplacian eigenvalue problem.Journal of Scientific Computing, 78(2):1231–1249, 2019

    Seyyed Abbas Mohammadi, Farid Bozorgnia, and Heinrich Voss. Optimal shape design for the p-Laplacian eigenvalue problem.Journal of Scientific Computing, 78(2):1231–1249, 2019

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    A minimization problem for an elliptic eigenvalue problem with nonlinear dependence on the eigenparameter.Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 31:119–131, 2016

    Seyyed Abbas Mohammadi and Heinrich Voss. A minimization problem for an elliptic eigenvalue problem with nonlinear dependence on the eigenparameter.Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 31:119–131, 2016

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Regularity of solutions of linear second order elliptic and parabolic boundary value problems on Lipschitz domains.Journal of Differential Equations, 251(4-5):860–880, 2011

    Robin Nittka. Regularity of solutions of linear second order elliptic and parabolic boundary value problems on Lipschitz domains.Journal of Differential Equations, 251(4-5):860–880, 2011

    work page 2011

  46. [46]

    Computation of free boundary minimal surfaces via ex- tremal Steklov eigenvalue problems.ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 27:34, 2021

    Edouard Oudet, Chiu-Yen Kao, and Braxton Osting. Computation of free boundary minimal surfaces via ex- tremal Steklov eigenvalue problems.ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 27:34, 2021

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Maximization of the Steklov eigenvalues with a diameter constraint.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 53(1):710–729, 2021

    Abdelkader Al Sayed, Beniamin Bogosel, Antoine Henrot, and Florent Nacry. Maximization of the Steklov eigenvalues with a diameter constraint.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 53(1):710–729, 2021

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Steklov eigenvalue problems on nearly spherical and nearly annular domains.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19585, 2023

    Nathan Schroeder, Weaam Alhejaili, and Chiu-Yen Kao. Steklov eigenvalue problems on nearly spherical and nearly annular domains.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19585, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    American Mathematical Soc., 2010

    Fredi Tr¨ oltzsch.Optimal control of partial differential equations: theory, methods, and applications, volume 112. American Mathematical Soc., 2010

    work page 2010

  50. [50]

    Inequalities for a classical eigenvalue problem.Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 3(6):745–753, 1954

    Robert Weinstock. Inequalities for a classical eigenvalue problem.Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 3(6):745–753, 1954. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Claremont McKenna College, Claremont, CA 91711 Email address:ckao@cmc.edu Division of Mathematics, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, United Kingdom; School of Computer Science and Applied Ma...

    work page 1954