Mass and distance of AGN black holes from warped accretion disks

Adriana Gonz\'alez-Ju\'arez; Alfredo Herrera-Aguilar

arxiv: 2509.23029 · v2 · submitted 2025-09-27 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.GA

Mass and distance of AGN black holes from warped accretion disks

Adriana Gonz\'alez-Ju\'arez , Alfredo Herrera-Aguilar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 13:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.GA

keywords black holesactive galactic nucleimegamasersaccretion diskswarped disksfrequency shiftsgeneral relativitysupermassive black holes

0 comments

The pith

Introducing a slight warp in AGN accretion disks decouples the mass and distance of their central black holes in analytical formulas.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops analytical expressions for the mass and distance of supermassive black holes in active galactic nuclei separately, rather than only their ratio. The approach uses general relativity to model frequency shifts of photons from megamasers orbiting in a slightly warped accretion disk, incorporating disk parameters and the galaxy's peculiar redshift as observables. Previously the method produced only the combined M/D value, which blends the two quantities and obscures separate physical insights. By adding the warp, the new formulas treat mass and distance as independent while avoiding extra fitted parameters. A reader would care because decoupled values help map black hole growth across cosmic time and refine our picture of galaxy evolution without losing information to a single ratio.

Core claim

By introducing a slight warping in the accretion disk of orbiting megamasers around a Schwarzschild black hole, independent analytical expressions for both the mass and the distance of AGN supermassive black holes are obtained in terms of maser frequency shifts, disk parameters, and the galaxy's peculiar redshift, thereby providing decoupled parameters instead of the previously coupled mass-to-distance ratio.

What carries the argument

The slight warp in the accretion disk, which introduces additional geometric degrees of freedom to separate the mass and distance in the general-relativistic frequency-shift modeling for orbiting test particles.

If this is right

Mass and distance can now be estimated independently for each AGN from the observables.
The physical information in mass and distance remains separate for studies of black hole and galaxy structure.
The analytical expressions apply to megamaser systems without needing additional fitted parameters beyond the warp.
Estimates preserve accuracy while decoupling the parameters using the peculiar redshift and disk geometry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

These separate values could be compared with other mass measurement techniques to test consistency in strong gravity.
The method might extend to Kerr black holes by including spin effects in the warp model.
Independent distances from AGNs could contribute to calibrating the cosmic distance scale.

Load-bearing premise

A slight warp in the accretion disk supplies enough additional degrees of freedom to decouple mass and distance while keeping the frequency-shift modeling free of significant unaccounted systematic errors or extra fitted parameters.

What would settle it

Applying the derived formulas to an AGN where both mass and distance have been measured independently by other techniques, such as stellar dynamics or reverberation mapping, and finding statistically significant disagreement would falsify the claim that the warp allows reliable decoupling.

read the original abstract

Along the last ten years, a general relativistic method has been developed to generate analytical expressions for the black hole (BH) parameters in terms of observables, namely the frequency shift of photons emitted by orbiting test particles and their positions on the sky. Applications of the method to astrophysical systems such as Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs), in particular to megamaser systems orbiting the central BH on their flat accretion disks, showed a coupling behavior in the mass-to-distance ratio $M/D$. Estimates for the ratio $M/D$ of a sample of BHs hosted at the core of several AGNs have been performed in recent years with the help of this method. However, both analytical expressions and statistical estimations depend only on the $M/D$ ratio rather than on independent parameters. It is of current general interest to work with decoupled parameters in order to safeguard the intrinsic physical information encoded in each of them, given their high scientific relevance in understanding the structure of our Universe. The purpose of this work is to find analytical expressions for the mass and distance of a Schwarzschild BH in terms of astrophysical observables by introducing a slight warping in the accretion disk of the orbiting megamasers. As a result, independent analytical formulas for the mass and distance of AGN supermassive BHs are presented in terms of astrophysical observables: maser frequency shifts, disk parameters, and the galaxy's peculiar redshift.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper extends the authors' flat-disk method by adding a slight warp to derive separate analytical expressions for AGN black hole mass and distance, but the decoupling may still depend on how the warp parameters are obtained.

read the letter

Hi, the main point is that this work takes the prior flat-disk approach for megamaser systems around AGN black holes and adds a small warp to break the mass-distance coupling that limited earlier estimates to just the ratio M/D. They present analytical formulas for M and D separately in terms of maser frequency shifts, disk parameters, and the galaxy's peculiar redshift. That addresses a practical limitation in using these systems for galaxy evolution or cosmological work, where independent values matter more than the ratio alone. The extension is straightforward and builds logically on their previous results without claiming a whole new framework. It is useful that they keep the focus on observables rather than introducing many new free parameters. The main soft spot is whether the warp really supplies independent information. If the warp amplitude or line-of-nodes angle ends up being fitted or inferred from the same line-of-sight velocity data that goes into the frequency shifts, the expressions could retain an implicit combination or hidden priors, leaving the decoupling incomplete. The abstract states that analytical expressions exist, yet without explicit derivation steps, validation on sample data, or error analysis visible, it is difficult to judge how cleanly the math works or how sensitive the results are to the assumed warp size. A minor additional issue is that any new geometric modeling could bring in unaccounted systematics that offset the gain from decoupling. This paper is aimed at researchers who model relativistic effects in AGN accretion disks or who need better-constrained black hole parameters for demographic studies. Readers already familiar with the flat-disk papers will see the incremental value quickly. It deserves a serious referee because it targets a known degeneracy with a concrete proposal and supplies explicit formulas, even if the referee will likely ask for more detail on the warp assumptions and checks against observations. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends prior general-relativistic methods for AGN megamaser systems by introducing a slight warp in the accretion disk. It derives analytical expressions for the independent mass M and distance D of a Schwarzschild black hole in terms of maser frequency shifts, disk parameters (including warp-related angles), and the galaxy's peculiar redshift, thereby breaking the M/D coupling that appears for flat disks.

Significance. If the analytic expressions are free of hidden degeneracies and the warp parameters are independently constrained by observables, the result would allow separate determination of supermassive black-hole masses and distances. This is relevant for AGN demographics, cosmological distance ladders, and tests of general relativity in strong-field regimes. The paper supplies explicit formulas rather than numerical fits, which is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (or the section presenting the frequency-shift formula for the warped disk): the derivation must explicitly show that the warp-induced variation in inclination or line-of-nodes angle enters the expressions for M and D through quantities that are either directly observed (e.g., sky positions of masers) or fixed a priori, rather than being inferred from the same line-of-sight velocity field that determines the frequency shifts. Without this separation the claimed decoupling of M and D is not demonstrated.
[analytic expressions section] The analytic expressions for M and D (Eqs. following the warp parameterization): it is unclear whether the warp amplitude or orientation introduces any auxiliary fitting parameters or priors that effectively restore an M/D combination. The manuscript should provide a parameter count and demonstrate that the system remains over-constrained by the observables listed in the abstract.

minor comments (2)

[abstract] The abstract states that 'analytical expressions exist' but supplies no derivation outline or validation steps; the main text should include at least a brief outline of the key steps from the geodesic frequency-shift formula to the final M and D expressions.
[notation] Notation for disk parameters (inclination, line-of-nodes angle, warp radius) should be defined once and used consistently; several symbols appear to be introduced without prior definition in the provided abstract and early sections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity of our derivations. We respond to each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (or the section presenting the frequency-shift formula for the warped disk): the derivation must explicitly show that the warp-induced variation in inclination or line-of-nodes angle enters the expressions for M and D through quantities that are either directly observed (e.g., sky positions of masers) or fixed a priori, rather than being inferred from the same line-of-sight velocity field that determines the frequency shifts. Without this separation the claimed decoupling of M and D is not demonstrated.

Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of this separation is necessary. In our derivation the warp-induced variations in inclination and line-of-nodes angle are determined solely from the observed sky-plane positions of the maser spots (obtained via VLBI imaging), which are independent of the line-of-sight frequency shifts. These positional observables fix the warp geometry a priori; the frequency shifts then supply the additional constraints that allow M and D to be solved separately. We have revised §3 to include a dedicated explanatory paragraph and a schematic diagram that explicitly separates the two classes of observables. revision: yes
Referee: [analytic expressions section] The analytic expressions for M and D (Eqs. following the warp parameterization): it is unclear whether the warp amplitude or orientation introduces any auxiliary fitting parameters or priors that effectively restore an M/D combination. The manuscript should provide a parameter count and demonstrate that the system remains over-constrained by the observables listed in the abstract.

Authors: The warp amplitude and orientation are not free fitting parameters; they are fixed from the observed spatial distribution of the masers in VLBI maps. We have added a new subsection that provides an explicit parameter count: the two unknowns are M and D; the warp parameters are constrained independently by imaging; and the observables consist of multiple maser spots (each supplying an independent sky position and frequency shift) together with the galaxy’s peculiar redshift. With more independent observables than unknowns the system remains over-constrained, preserving the decoupling of M and D. The revised text includes this demonstration. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Analytical derivation remains self-contained; warp supplies explicit extra observables without reducing to prior M/D fit

full rationale

The paper extends a prior GR method (flat-disk case) by introducing a slight warp, then derives closed-form expressions for independent M and D in terms of directly listed observables: maser frequency shifts, disk parameters (now including warp geometry), and peculiar redshift. No step equates the output formulas back to an input M/D ratio by construction, nor does any fitted parameter get relabeled as a prediction. The central decoupling is achieved by the additional geometric degrees of freedom entering the analytic expressions explicitly rather than being absorbed into a single ratio. Prior self-citations describe the flat-disk baseline but are not load-bearing for the new warp-based formulas. The derivation is therefore independent of its own fitted inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5785 in / 1142 out tokens · 60928 ms · 2026-05-18T13:16:39.737645+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

independent analytical formulas for the mass and distance ... by introducing a slight warping in the accretion disk ... 1 + z_tot1,2 = 1/√(1−3M̃) (1 ± √M̃ sin x / √(1−2M̃)) √((1+zp)/(1−zp))
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

M/D ≈ M̃ Θ = Θ/3 [(1−zp)(R+B)² − 4(1+zp)] / [(1−zp)(R+B)²]

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Black hole mass and distance from accretion disk astrophysical observables
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Closed-form expressions for Schwarzschild black hole mass, distance to Earth, and orbital radius are derived from photon frequency shift observables along the full orbit using redshift rapidity from symmetric emitter ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

2018, Space Science Reviews, 214, 1

Czerny, B., Beaton, R., Bejger, M., Cackett, E.,et al. 2018, Space Science Reviews, 214, 1

work page 2018
[2]

Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory-LIGO-T1200427–v1

Gossan, S., Ott, C., 2012, Methods of measuring as- tronomical distances. Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory-LIGO-T1200427–v1

work page 2012
[3]

Herrera-Aguilar, A., Nucamendi, U., 2015, Phys. Rev. D, 92, 045024

work page 2015
[4]

Momennia, M., Nuca- mendi, U., 2022, Phys

Banerjee, P., Herrera-Aguilar, A. Momennia, M., Nuca- mendi, U., 2022, Phys. Rev. D, 105, 124037

work page 2022
[5]

Sharif M., Iftikhar S., 2016, Eur. Phys. J. C, 76, 404

work page 2016
[6]

V., 2021, Eur

Kraniotis G. V., 2021, Eur. Phys. J. C, 81, 147

work page 2021
[7]

A., Bret´ on N., 2021, Astrophys

L´ opez L. A., Bret´ on N., 2021, Astrophys. Space Sci., 366, 55

work page 2021
[8]

Giamb` o R., Luongo O., Mauro L., 2022, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 137, 612

work page 2022
[9]

Morales-Herrera G., Ortega-Ruiz P., Momennia M., Herrera-Aguilar A., 2024, Eur. Phys. J. C, 84, 525

work page 2024
[10]

Nucamendi, U., 2023, Phys

Momennia, M., Herrera-Aguilar, A. Nucamendi, U., 2023, Phys. Rev. D, 107, 104041

work page 2023
[11]

Sheoran P., Herrera-Aguilar A., Nucamendi U., 2018, Phys. Rev. D, 97, 124049

work page 2018
[12]

Shankar Kuniyal R., Uniyal R., Biswas A.,et al.2018, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 33, 1850098

work page 2018
[13]

D., 2018, Class

Uniyal R., Nandan H., Purohit K. D., 2018, Class. Quant. Grav., 35, 025003

work page 2018
[14]

Debnath U., 2021, Chin. J. Phys., 70, 213

work page 2021
[15]

Mustafa G., Hussain I., Liu W.-M., 2022, Chin. J. Phys., 80, 148

work page 2022
[16]

Fu Q.-M., Zhang X., 2023, Phys. Rev. D, 107, 064019

work page 2023
[17]

Alibekov H., Narzilloev B., Abdujabbarov A., Ahmedov B., 2023, Symmetry, 15, 1414

work page 2023
[18]

Saidov B., Narzilloev B., Abdujabbarov A., Khudoy- berdieva M., Ahmedov B., 2024, Universe, 10, 454

work page 2024
[19]

A., Momennia M., Herrera-Aguilar A., 2024, Eur

Mart´ ınez-Valera D. A., Momennia M., Herrera-Aguilar A., 2024, Eur. Phys. J. C, 84, 288

work page 2024
[20]

A., Herrera-Aguilar A., 2025, Param- eter estimation of nonsingular black holes in conformal gravity using megamaser observational data from NGC 4258; arXiv:2504.04588 [gr-qc]

Mart´ ınez-Valera D. A., Herrera-Aguilar A., 2025, Param- eter estimation of nonsingular black holes in conformal gravity using megamaser observational data from NGC 4258; arXiv:2504.04588 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Nucamendi, U., Herrera-Aguilar, A., Lizardo-Castro, R., L´ opez-Cruz, O., 2021, ApJL, 917, L14

work page 2021
[22]

Nachr., 346, e20250016

Gonz´ alez-Ju´ arez, Herrera-Aguilar, A., 2025, Astron. Nachr., 346, e20250016

work page 2025
[23]

Nuca- mendi, U., 2024, Eur

Momennia, M., Banerjee, P., Herrera-Aguilar, A. Nuca- mendi, U., 2024, Eur. Phys. J. C, 84, 583

work page 2024
[24]

R., Moran, J

Herrnstein, J. R., Moran, J. M., Greenhill, L. J., Trotter, Adam S., 2005, ApJ, 629, 719

work page 2005
[25]

J., Braatz J

Reid M. J., Braatz J. A., Condon J. J., Lo K. Y., Kuo C. Y.,et al.2013, ApJ, 767, 154

work page 2013
[26]

Y., Braatz, J

Kuo, C. Y., Braatz, J. A., Reid, M. J., Lo, K. Y., Condon, J. J.,et al.2013, ApJ, 767, 155

work page 2013
[27]

A, Reid, M

Gao, F., Braatz, J. A, Reid, M. J., Lo, K. Y., Condon, J. J.,et al.2016, ApJ, 817, 128

work page 2016
[28]

A., Condon, J

Zhao, W., Braatz, J. A., Condon, J. J., Lo, K. Y., Henkel, C.,et al.2018, ApJ, 854, 124

work page 2018
[29]

W., Braatz, J

Pesce, D. W., Braatz, J. A., Reid, M. J., Condon, J. J., Gao, F.,et al.2020, ApJ, 890, 118

work page 2020
[30]

Y., Braatz, J

Kuo, C. Y., Braatz, J. A., Impellizzeri, C. M. V., Gao, F., Pesce, D.,et al.2020, MNRAS, 498, 1609

work page 2020
[31]

Rindler, W., 1982, Introduction to special relativity (Clarendon Press, Oxford Science Publications) 192

work page 1982
[32]

A., Condon, J

Pesce, D., Braatz, J. A., Condon, J. J., Gao, F., Henkel, C.,et al.2015, ApJ, 810, 65

work page 2015
[33]

M., Scrimgeour, M

Davis, T. M., Scrimgeour, M. I., 2014, MNRAS, 442, 1117

work page 2014
[34]

W., Braatz, J

Pesce, D. W., Braatz, J. A., Reid, M. J., Riess, A. G., Scolnic, D.,et al.2020, ApJL, 891, L1

work page 2020
[35]

S., Tarl´ e, G., Zevin, M., et al.ApJ, 2023, 943, 133

Farrah, D., Petty, S., Croker K. S., Tarl´ e, G., Zevin, M., et al.ApJ, 2023, 943, 133

work page 2023
[36]

S., Zevin, M., Tarl´ e, G., Faraoni, V.,et al.ApJL, 2023, 944, L31

Farrah, D., Croker K. S., Zevin, M., Tarl´ e, G., Faraoni, V.,et al.ApJL, 2023, 944, L31

work page 2023

[1] [1]

2018, Space Science Reviews, 214, 1

Czerny, B., Beaton, R., Bejger, M., Cackett, E.,et al. 2018, Space Science Reviews, 214, 1

work page 2018

[2] [2]

Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory-LIGO-T1200427–v1

Gossan, S., Ott, C., 2012, Methods of measuring as- tronomical distances. Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory-LIGO-T1200427–v1

work page 2012

[3] [3]

Herrera-Aguilar, A., Nucamendi, U., 2015, Phys. Rev. D, 92, 045024

work page 2015

[4] [4]

Momennia, M., Nuca- mendi, U., 2022, Phys

Banerjee, P., Herrera-Aguilar, A. Momennia, M., Nuca- mendi, U., 2022, Phys. Rev. D, 105, 124037

work page 2022

[5] [5]

Sharif M., Iftikhar S., 2016, Eur. Phys. J. C, 76, 404

work page 2016

[6] [6]

V., 2021, Eur

Kraniotis G. V., 2021, Eur. Phys. J. C, 81, 147

work page 2021

[7] [7]

A., Bret´ on N., 2021, Astrophys

L´ opez L. A., Bret´ on N., 2021, Astrophys. Space Sci., 366, 55

work page 2021

[8] [8]

Giamb` o R., Luongo O., Mauro L., 2022, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 137, 612

work page 2022

[9] [9]

Morales-Herrera G., Ortega-Ruiz P., Momennia M., Herrera-Aguilar A., 2024, Eur. Phys. J. C, 84, 525

work page 2024

[10] [10]

Nucamendi, U., 2023, Phys

Momennia, M., Herrera-Aguilar, A. Nucamendi, U., 2023, Phys. Rev. D, 107, 104041

work page 2023

[11] [11]

Sheoran P., Herrera-Aguilar A., Nucamendi U., 2018, Phys. Rev. D, 97, 124049

work page 2018

[12] [12]

Shankar Kuniyal R., Uniyal R., Biswas A.,et al.2018, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 33, 1850098

work page 2018

[13] [13]

D., 2018, Class

Uniyal R., Nandan H., Purohit K. D., 2018, Class. Quant. Grav., 35, 025003

work page 2018

[14] [14]

Debnath U., 2021, Chin. J. Phys., 70, 213

work page 2021

[15] [15]

Mustafa G., Hussain I., Liu W.-M., 2022, Chin. J. Phys., 80, 148

work page 2022

[16] [16]

Fu Q.-M., Zhang X., 2023, Phys. Rev. D, 107, 064019

work page 2023

[17] [17]

Alibekov H., Narzilloev B., Abdujabbarov A., Ahmedov B., 2023, Symmetry, 15, 1414

work page 2023

[18] [18]

Saidov B., Narzilloev B., Abdujabbarov A., Khudoy- berdieva M., Ahmedov B., 2024, Universe, 10, 454

work page 2024

[19] [19]

A., Momennia M., Herrera-Aguilar A., 2024, Eur

Mart´ ınez-Valera D. A., Momennia M., Herrera-Aguilar A., 2024, Eur. Phys. J. C, 84, 288

work page 2024

[20] [20]

A., Herrera-Aguilar A., 2025, Param- eter estimation of nonsingular black holes in conformal gravity using megamaser observational data from NGC 4258; arXiv:2504.04588 [gr-qc]

Mart´ ınez-Valera D. A., Herrera-Aguilar A., 2025, Param- eter estimation of nonsingular black holes in conformal gravity using megamaser observational data from NGC 4258; arXiv:2504.04588 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025

[21] [21]

Nucamendi, U., Herrera-Aguilar, A., Lizardo-Castro, R., L´ opez-Cruz, O., 2021, ApJL, 917, L14

work page 2021

[22] [22]

Nachr., 346, e20250016

Gonz´ alez-Ju´ arez, Herrera-Aguilar, A., 2025, Astron. Nachr., 346, e20250016

work page 2025

[23] [23]

Nuca- mendi, U., 2024, Eur

Momennia, M., Banerjee, P., Herrera-Aguilar, A. Nuca- mendi, U., 2024, Eur. Phys. J. C, 84, 583

work page 2024

[24] [24]

R., Moran, J

Herrnstein, J. R., Moran, J. M., Greenhill, L. J., Trotter, Adam S., 2005, ApJ, 629, 719

work page 2005

[25] [25]

J., Braatz J

Reid M. J., Braatz J. A., Condon J. J., Lo K. Y., Kuo C. Y.,et al.2013, ApJ, 767, 154

work page 2013

[26] [26]

Y., Braatz, J

Kuo, C. Y., Braatz, J. A., Reid, M. J., Lo, K. Y., Condon, J. J.,et al.2013, ApJ, 767, 155

work page 2013

[27] [27]

A, Reid, M

Gao, F., Braatz, J. A, Reid, M. J., Lo, K. Y., Condon, J. J.,et al.2016, ApJ, 817, 128

work page 2016

[28] [28]

A., Condon, J

Zhao, W., Braatz, J. A., Condon, J. J., Lo, K. Y., Henkel, C.,et al.2018, ApJ, 854, 124

work page 2018

[29] [29]

W., Braatz, J

Pesce, D. W., Braatz, J. A., Reid, M. J., Condon, J. J., Gao, F.,et al.2020, ApJ, 890, 118

work page 2020

[30] [30]

Y., Braatz, J

Kuo, C. Y., Braatz, J. A., Impellizzeri, C. M. V., Gao, F., Pesce, D.,et al.2020, MNRAS, 498, 1609

work page 2020

[31] [31]

Rindler, W., 1982, Introduction to special relativity (Clarendon Press, Oxford Science Publications) 192

work page 1982

[32] [32]

A., Condon, J

Pesce, D., Braatz, J. A., Condon, J. J., Gao, F., Henkel, C.,et al.2015, ApJ, 810, 65

work page 2015

[33] [33]

M., Scrimgeour, M

Davis, T. M., Scrimgeour, M. I., 2014, MNRAS, 442, 1117

work page 2014

[34] [34]

W., Braatz, J

Pesce, D. W., Braatz, J. A., Reid, M. J., Riess, A. G., Scolnic, D.,et al.2020, ApJL, 891, L1

work page 2020

[35] [35]

S., Tarl´ e, G., Zevin, M., et al.ApJ, 2023, 943, 133

Farrah, D., Petty, S., Croker K. S., Tarl´ e, G., Zevin, M., et al.ApJ, 2023, 943, 133

work page 2023

[36] [36]

S., Zevin, M., Tarl´ e, G., Faraoni, V.,et al.ApJL, 2023, 944, L31

Farrah, D., Croker K. S., Zevin, M., Tarl´ e, G., Faraoni, V.,et al.ApJL, 2023, 944, L31

work page 2023