Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Hybrid Acousto-Optical Double Dressing of a Two-Level System

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A surface acoustic wave tuned to the generalized Rabi frequency can make the two otherwise independent dipole channels that form the central Mollow line interfere destructively, erasing the line and pinpointing the optimum for optical cooli

desk verdict Real central-line cancellation, softer cooling claim—worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.25847 v2 pith:3CB5SYF2 submitted 2025-09-30 quant-ph

Yuan Zhan , Zixuan Wang , Richard P. Mirin , Kevin L. Silverman , Shuo Sun This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords resonancefluorescenceMollowtripletdressedstatessurfaceacousticwavequantumdotoptomechanicsphononcoolinginterference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a single two-level system driven simultaneously by a strong laser and a gigahertz surface acoustic wave enters a regime where the acoustic field acts as a second dressing field on the atom-light dressed states. In this regime the two transition dipoles that normally add up to the central peak of the Mollow triplet are synchronized in antiphase, so the central emission line vanishes when the generalized Rabi frequency equals the acoustic frequency. The same spectra, viewed through a doubly dressed-state model, provide a direct measurement of the rate at which emitted photons remove or add phonons in the acoustic resonator, and they show that optimal phonon cooling also sits at that resonance condition. A sympathetic reader would care because this connects a standard quantum-optics signature to mechanical control at gigahertz frequencies and offers a spectroscopic way to monitor emitter-optomechanical cooling without a separate mechanical readout.

What carries the argument

The ordering device is double dressing. First the laser hybridizes the bare emitter with the optical field into atom-photon dressed states |±, n'⟩, split by the generalized Rabi frequency Ω_R. The acoustic drive Hamiltonian ℏΩ_S cos(ω_S t) σ_z then acts in that basis as a transverse coupling between |+, n', m⟩ and |−, n', m+1⟩, creating atom-photon-phonon doubly dressed states |±~, n', m'⟩ = (|+, n', m⟩ ± |−, n', m+1⟩)/√2 at resonance. The key structural fact is that the dipole matrix elements for the two central transitions |±~, n', m'⟩ → |±~, n'−1, m'⟩ vanish exactly at Ω_R = ω_S, while the sideband transitions anticross with minimum splitting 2Ω_S. The cooling-rate extraction rests on a s

What would settle it

Use a spectrometer with resolution much better than the 525-MHz etalon and sweep the laser detuning at fixed acoustic drive: the model predicts the integrated central-line count drops to near zero exactly at Ω_R = ω_S for both signs of detuning, so a clearly shifted or broadened minimum would falsify the cancellation picture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports that a surface acoustic wave parametrically modulating the transition frequency of a strongly laser-driven two-level system drives coherent Rabi oscillations between the atom-photon dressed states |+, n'⟩ and |−, n'⟩ of the same energy ladder. Because these two dressed states carry symmetric and antisymmetric superpositions, the two dipole transitions that contribute to the central Mollow line acquire a fixed π phase difference once the acoustic drive synchronizes them; at the generalized Rabi resonance Ω_R = √(Ω_L² + Δ²) = ω_S, destructive interference makes the central emission vanish. The measured spectra, reproduced by a Floquet/quantum-regression calculation and organi

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the doubly dressed-state mapping used in the supplement—including the single-phonon coupling strength g0/2π = 1.2 MHz taken from a similar earlier device—faithfully converts the measured sideband intensities into phonon cooling rates; if that mapping or the borrowed coupling value is inaccurate, the cooling-rate validation weakens even though the central-line cancellation could still be real.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At the resonance Ω_R = ω_S, the central line of the Mollow triplet disappears and the sideband peaks anticross with a minimum splitting of 2Ω_S, giving a spectral signature that marks the resonance without needing absolute intensity calibration.
  • The first-order sideband intensities at ω_L ± ω_S are sufficient to determine the phonon cooling or heating rate, so resonance-fluorescence spectroscopy becomes a direct probe of emitter-optomechanical cooling.
  • Optimal cooling (and heating) of the acoustic mode occurs at the generalized Rabi resonance, and numerical master-equation calculations in the supplement indicate the same condition remains optimal even in the low-phonon-number regime approaching ground-state cooling.
  • A gigahertz-frequency longitudinal drive can control quantum interference between emission channels of a two-level emitter, extending dressed-state manipulation and phenomena such as spectral line suppression to microwave-acoustic frequencies.
  • The doubly dressed-state picture predicts three groups of emission triplets with higher-order dressing lines, giving a concrete spectral fingerprint for future acousto-optical experiments on single emitters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: The vanishing of the central Mollow line at Ω_R = ω_S could be used as a self-calibrating null marker for the generalized Rabi frequency, since the zero appears at a ratio condition rather than at an absolute power setting.
  • Inference: The sideband-intensity identity that isolates the cooling rate may extend to other strongly driven emitter-mechanical systems, offering a simple two-color thermometry scheme that avoids full spectral tomography.
  • Inference: The authors acknowledge that several weak spectral lines are not described by the lowest-order doubly dressed picture and attribute them to higher-order dressing; this incompleteness, together with the high-phonon-occupancy regime, means the analytic sideband mapping should be rechecked near resonances or at low phonon number.
  • Inference: If the cancellation persists in other emitter platforms, it would turn the acousto-optical double-dressing configuration into a general tool for microwave-to-optical transduction and for preparing nonclassical acoustic states.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports resonance-fluorescence spectra of a single charged InAs/GaAs quantum dot driven simultaneously by a resonant laser (optical Rabi frequency Ω_L) and a gigahertz surface-acoustic-wave field (frequency ω_S, acoustic driving strength Ω_S). The central observation is a strong suppression of the central Mollow-triplet peak when the generalized optical Rabi frequency Ω_R = sqrt(Ω_L² + Δ²) matches ω_S, which the authors attribute to destructive interference between two transition dipoles synchronized by the acoustic drive. The measured spectra are reproduced by a Floquet/quantum-regression calculation using independently measured parameters (γ/2π = 134 MHz, linewidth 678 MHz, etalon 525 MHz, calibrated Ω_S). A doubly dressed-state picture (atom-photon dressed states then acoustic dressing) is used to explain the peak positions and the cancellation. The paper further extracts a phonon cooling rate from the sideband intensities and finds that optimal cooling/heating occurs at Ω_R = ω_S, which is claimed as the first direct measurement of this condition.

Significance. If the results hold, this is a valuable experimental advance: it extends dressed-state interference to a longitudinal gigahertz-frequency drive, provides a spectrally clean demonstration of dynamical cancellation in a new frequency range, and connects Mollow physics with emitter optomechanics. The paper should be credited for using independently measured lifetimes, linewidths, and calibrated drive strengths rather than free spectral fits, and for presenting a quantitative Floquet/quantum-regression calculation that captures the spectra. The core spectral cancellation is direct and well supported. The cooling-rate claim, however, is less direct than stated: the experimental map in Fig. 4a is constructed with the same dressed-state weighting that generates the theoretical prediction, so the agreement in Fig. 4 has a partly circular component. This weakens only the cooling/application portion of the paper, not the central spectral result.

major comments (2)
  1. [Supplementary S5 (Eq. S11–S13), Fig. 4] The 'experimental' cooling map in Fig. 4a is computed from Eq. S11 as R ∝ Σ δN_phonon,α |⟨f|σ_x|i⟩|² I_α, with δN_phonon,α and dipole matrix elements taken from the doubly dressed-state Table S1. The theoretical map in Fig. 4b is the same expression reduced to Eq. S13, whose denominator has the resonance form [(ω_S−Ω_R)²Ω_R² + Ω_L²Ω_S²] and therefore has its extremum at Ω_R = ω_S. Because the measured I_α are assigned and weighted with the same model, the agreement between Figs. 4a and 4b is to an unknown degree a retranscription of the raw sideband asymmetry through a mapping that already contains the predicted optimum. The raw observable I(ω_L−ω_S) − I(ω_L+ω_S) is not reported. Please show this raw asymmetry as a function of Ω_L and Δ, or otherwise demonstrate that the resonance condition survives a model-independent sideband analysis. Without this, the claim of a 'first direct measure
  2. [Supplementary S4 (Eq. S8, Table S1), Fig. 3] The doubly dressed-state assignment used for both the spectral predictions and the cooling extraction is explicitly approximate: the text states that several observed lines in Fig. 3c are not predicted by this picture and are attributed to higher-order dressing. The cooling extraction via Eq. S12 relies on the first-order sidebands at ω_L ± ω_S being well resolved and uncontaminated. If the unidentified higher-order lines overlap these sidebands in the parameter range of Fig. 4, the measured I_α entering Eq. S11 can be biased. Please quantify the positions and weights of the higher-order lines in the Ω_L–Δ range of Fig. 4, or justify that they lie outside the fitted sideband windows. This is needed to make the extracted cooling rate robust and to strengthen the 'direct measurement' claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title/Abstract] The title contains a typographical artifact: 'Driv en' should be 'Driven'.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption appears corrupted: the panel labels 'a b c' are followed by meaningless fragments ('a b ... a b ...'). The caption should be cleaned so that panels a–c are described properly.
  3. [Fig. 4] No error bars or uncertainty estimates are shown for the extracted cooling rates in Fig. 4a, and no quantitative goodness-of-fit is given for the claimed agreement with Fig. 4b. A quantitative comparison (e.g., residual or correlation metric) would help.
  4. [Fig. 2c/2f] Because the spectra are convolved with the 525-MHz etalon and broadened by spectral diffusion, the central line is suppressed but likely not zero. Please specify the measured residual contrast at the cancellation point, or show the unconvolved theory prediction, to clarify what 'dynamical cancellation' means operationally.
  5. [Note added] The 'Note added' paragraph describing peer-review awareness of Ref. [50] is out of place in a journal article and should be removed or folded into the acknowledgments/introduction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spectral cancellation is a direct measurement, and the cooling-rate map is a model-transcribed observable whose agreement with theory is not forced.

full rationale

I find no circular step in which a claimed prediction reduces by construction to its inputs. The central result, the dynamical cancellation of the Mollow central peak under acoustic driving, is presented as directly measured spectra (Figs. 2c and 2f), and the theory is an independent Floquet/quantum-regression calculation with parameters obtained from separate calibration measurements (cavity Q, linewidth, radiative lifetime, acoustic driving strength extracted from absorption spectra in Sec. S1). The doubly dressed-state explanation derives the zero dipole moments at Rabi resonance from the model rather than importing the observed cancellation as an input. The cooling-rate extraction in Sec. S5 is model-mediated: Eq. S11 defines an experimental phonon cooling rate from measured transition intensities weighted by theoretical phonon-number changes from Table S1, and Eq. S12 reduces it to the measured first-order sideband asymmetry. The theoretical map in Fig. 4b is independently calculated from Eq. S13, so the agreement is not automatic: the experimental map is determined by the measured sideband intensities, not by the theoretical resonance denominator. One could ask for the raw Stokes/anti-Stokes asymmetry to be reported as a direct cross-check, but that is a reporting/validation concern, not circularity. The only self-citation, g0/2π = 1.2 MHz from Ref. S6, is a measured parameter used in supporting master-equation simulations of ground-state cooling; it is not used to fit the main optimal-cooling condition and does not carry the central argument. Thus the derivation is self-contained against its external benchmarks and the paper merits a non-circular finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central spectral prediction uses independently measured parameters (γ, Γ, etalon width) and two calibrated drive strengths; no new physical entities are introduced. The main items the reader effectively supplies are the doubly dressed-state mapping used to extract cooling rates and the borrowed value of g0 for the ground-state-cooling simulation.

free parameters (4)
  • acoustic driving strength Ω_S = 1.75 GHz (calibration slope 4.77 GHz/V)
    Extracted from fits of the quantum-dot absorption spectra to Bessel sidebands (Eq. S1); used as an input to all theoretical spectra and cooling-rate maps.
  • optical Rabi frequency Ω_L = 0-7.9 GHz depending on laser power
    Varied experimentally and calibrated from Mollow-triplet sideband fits; used as an input to the Floquet calculation and dressed-state model.
  • single-phonon coupling g0 = 1.2 MHz (from Ref. S6, a similar prior device)
    Used in the master-equation simulation of ground-state cooling (Supp. S6); not measured in situ on this sample.
  • spectral diffusion width Γ = 678 MHz FWHM
    Measured absorption linewidth; used to average theoretical spectra and cooling maps over laser detuning. Independent measurement, but a fixed parameter in the theory.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The emitter is an ideal two-level system (single electron-charged QD with degenerate polarizations); all other QD states, spins, and phonon sidebands are neglected.
    Invoked in the main text around Fig. 1b and Methods; required for the Bloch/dressed-state Hamiltonian to apply.
  • domain assumption The acoustic field acts only as a longitudinal frequency modulation Ĥ_S = ℏΩ_S cos(ω_S t) σ_z; strain-induced polarization mixing or anharmonic corrections are negligible.
    This form is used for the Floquet calculation (Supp. S3, Eq. S5) and the dressed-state picture (Supp. S4).
  • domain assumption The acoustic field can be treated semiclassically as a coherent periodic drive; quantum phonon statistics enter only in the master-equation extension (Supp. S6).
    Used in Eqs. S4-S5 and S13; the experiment operates in the high-temperature regime mth ≫ 1 where this is a reasonable approximation.
  • domain assumption Static spectral diffusion can be modeled by a Gaussian distribution of laser detunings with FWHM equal to the measured linewidth 678 MHz.
    Applied to all theoretical spectra and cooling maps; affects line shapes and can partially wash out or mimic interference features.
  • standard math The standard optical Bloch equations, quantum regression theorem, and Floquet solution are valid for this driven open system.
    Foundational to Supp. S3; standard framework for driven two-level systems.
  • ad hoc to paper The single-phonon coupling g0 = 1.2 MHz measured in a similar prior device (Ref. S6) applies to this quantum dot/SAW cavity.
    Used in Supp. S6 master-equation simulations; no in-situ measurement of g0 on this device is presented.
  • domain assumption The resolved-sideband regime holds, so the absorption spectrum is given by Bessel function sidebands (Eq. S1) with Ω_S ≲ ω_S.
    Used to calibrate Ω_S from absorption spectra (Supp. S1); Fig. 1e verifies the resolved sidebands.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hybrid Acousto-Optical Double Dressing of a Two-Level System." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3CB5SYF2

@misc{pith2026250925847,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hybrid Acousto-Optical Double Dressing of a Two-Level System},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3CB5SYF2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.25847}
}
read the original abstract

We experimentally investigate resonance fluorescence from a two-level system in a novel configuration where a strong laser drives an optical Rabi oscillation while an acoustic field parametrically modulates the frequency of the two-level system. We observe emission spectra that deviate markedly from the standard Mollow triplet, including dynamical cancellation of the central peak. A doubly dressed state model incorporating hybridization among the emitter, optical field, and acoustic field captures these features. Guided by this model, we experimentally validate the condition for optimal cooling of acoustic phonons in an emitter-optomechanical system. These results reveal new regimes of strongly driven quantum nonlinear interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.25847 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. e shows the resonance fluorescence spectra of the quantum dot as we vary the laser frequency. In this measurement, we keep the acoustic drive off and fix the optical Rabi frequency to be ΩL/2π = 2.625 GHz. We observe the standard detuned Mollow triplet with each side peak separated by the generalized Rabi fre￾quency ΩR = p Ω2 L + ∆2 from the central one. Figure 2f shows the resonance fluorescence spectra of the quan… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a shows the experimentally measured phonon cooling rate as a function of the optical Rabi frequency and laser detuning, with the acoustic drive fixed at ΩS/2π = 1.75 GHz. As expected, a red-detuned laser removes phonons from the acoustic cavity, while a blue￾detuned la…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references

  1. [1]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    1997

  2. [2]

    We employ a combination of cross-polarization rejection and differen- tial detection, and achieve an extinction ratio of ∼ 5×108 (see Supplementary Section 2)

    at each laser power and detuning is obtained by recording the fluorescence inten- sity of the quantum dot as a function of the center fre- quency of a scanning etalon that has a linewidth of 525 MHz and a free spectral range of 20 GHz. We employ a combination of cross-polarization rejection and differen- tial detection, and achieve an extinction ratio of ∼ ...

  3. [3]

    B. R. Mollow, Power spectrum of light scattered by two- level systems, Physical Review 188, 1969 (1969)

    1969

  4. [4]

    Cohen-Tannoudji and S

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji and S. Reynaud, Dressed-atom de- scription of resonance fluorescence and absorption spec- tra of a multi-level atom in an intense laser beam, Jour- nal of Physics B: Atomic and Molecular Physics 10, 345 (1977)

    1977

  5. [5]

    S. Ates, S. M. Ulrich, S. Reitzenstein, A. L¨ offler, A. Forchel, and P. Michler, Post-selected indistinguish- able photons from the resonance fluorescence of a single quantum dot in a microcavity, Physical Review Letters 103, 167402 (2009)

    2009

  6. [6]

    Ulhaq, S

    A. Ulhaq, S. Weiler, S. M. Ulrich, R. Roßbach, M. Jetter, and P. Michler, Cascaded single-photon emission from the mollow triplet sidebands of a quantum dot, Nature Photonics 6, 238 (2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    Peiris, K

    M. Peiris, K. Konthasinghe, and A. Muller, Franson in- terference generated by a two-level system, Physical Re- view Letters 118, 030501 (2017)

    2017

  8. [8]

    Masters, X.-X

    L. Masters, X.-X. Hu, M. Cordier, G. Maron, L. Pache, A. Rauschenbeutel, M. Schemmer, and J. Volz, On the simultaneous scattering of two photons by a single two- level atom, Nature Photonics 17, 972 (2023)

    2023

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    J. C. L´ opez Carre˜ no, S. Berm´ udez Feijoo, and M. Stobi´ nska, Entanglement in resonance fluorescence, npj Nanophotonics 1, 3 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    C. S. Mu˜ noz, E. del Valle, A. G. Tudela, K. M¨ uller, S. Lichtmannecker, M. Kaniber, C. Tejedor, J. J. Finley, and F. P. Laussy, Emitters of n-photon bundles, Nature Photonics 8, 550 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    Nick Vamivakas, Y

    A. Nick Vamivakas, Y. Zhao, C.-Y. Lu, and M. Atat¨ ure, Spin-resolved quantum-dot resonance fluorescence, Na- ture Physics 5, 198 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    Zakrzewski, M

    J. Zakrzewski, M. Lewenstein, and T. W. Mossberg, The- ory of dressed-state lasers. i. effective hamiltonians and stability properties, Physical Review A 44, 7717 (1991)

    1991

  5. [13]

    Quang and H

    T. Quang and H. Freedhoff, Atomic population inversion and enhancement of resonance fluorescence in a cavity, Physical Review A 47, 2285 (1993)

    1993

  6. [14]

    Ficek and T

    Z. Ficek and T. Rudolph, Quantum interference in a driven two-level atom, Physical Review A 60, R4245 (1999)

    1999

  7. [15]

    Y. He, Y. M. He, J. Liu, Y. J. Wei, H. Y. Ram ´ ırez, M. Atat¨ ure, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, S. H¨ ofling, C. Y. Lu, and J. W. Pan, Dynamically controlled resonance fluores- cence spectra from a doubly dressed single ingaas quan- tum dot, Physical Review Letters 114, 097402 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    Gustin, L

    C. Gustin, L. Hanschke, K. Boos, J. R. A. M¨ uller, M. Kremser, J. J. Finley, S. Hughes, and K. M¨ uller, High- resolution spectroscopy of a quantum dot driven bichro- matically by two strong coherent fields, Physical Review Research 3, 013044 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    T. E. Barrett, N. G. Woodard, and G. P. Lafyatis, Mag- netic resonance of a two-state atom dressed by a light field, Physical Review Letters 69, 422 (1992) . 7

    1992

  10. [18]

    Brunel, B

    C. Brunel, B. Lounis, P. Tamarat, and M. Orrit, Rabi resonances of a single molecule driven by rf and laser fields, Physical Review Letters 81, 2679 (1998)

    1998

  11. [19]

    M. A. Ant´ on, S. Maede-Razavi, F. Carre˜ no, I. Thanopu- los, and E. Paspalakis, Optical and microwave control of resonance fluorescence and squeezing spectra in a polar molecule, Physical Review A 96, 063812 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    D. M. Lukin, A. D. White, R. Trivedi, M. A. Guidry, N. Morioka, C. Babin, ¨O. O. Soykal, J. Ul-Hassan, N. T. Son, T. Ohshima, P. K. Vasireddy, M. H. Nasr, S. Sun, J.-P. W. MacLean, C. Dory, E. A. Nanni, J. Wrachtrup, F. Kaiser, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Spectrally reconfigurable qua...

    2020

  13. [21]

    Munsch, A

    M. Munsch, A. V. Kuhlmann, D. Cadeddu, J.-M. G´ erard, J. Claudon, M. Poggio, and R. J. Warburton, Resonant driving of a single photon emitter embedded in a mechan- ical oscillator, Nature Communications 8, 76 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    Spinnler, G

    C. Spinnler, G. N. Nguyen, Y. Wang, L. Zhai, A. Javadi, M. Erbe, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, P. Lo- dahl, L. Midolo, and R. J. Warburton, A single-photon emitter coupled to a phononic-crystal resonator in the resolved-sideband regime, Nature Communications 15, 9509 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Wilson-Rae, P

    I. Wilson-Rae, P. Zoller, and A. Imamo¯ glu, Laser cool- ing of a nanomechanical resonator mode to its quantum ground state, Physical Review Letters 92, 075507 (2004)

    2004

  16. [24]

    Rabl, Cooling of mechanical motion with a two-level system: The high-temperature regime, Physical Review B 82, 165320 (2010)

    P. Rabl, Cooling of mechanical motion with a two-level system: The high-temperature regime, Physical Review B 82, 165320 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    M. J. A. Schuetz, E. M. Kessler, G. Giedke, L. M. K. Vandersypen, M. D. Lukin, and J. I. Cirac, Universal quantum transducers based on surface acoustic waves, Physical Review X 5, 031031 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Y. Yan, Z. L¨ u, H. Zheng, and Y. Zhao, Exotic fluores- cence spectrum of a superconducting qubit driven simul- taneously by longitudinal and transversal fields, Physical Review A 93, 033812 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    S¨ ollner, L

    I. S¨ ollner, L. Midolo, and P. Lodahl, Deterministic single- phonon source triggered by a single photon, Physical Re- view Letters 116, 234301 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    M. A. Lemonde, S. Meesala, A. Sipahigil, M. J. A. Schuetz, M. D. Lukin, M. Loncar, and P. Rabl, Phonon networks with silicon-vacancy centers in diamond waveg- uides, Physical Review Letters 120, 213603 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Bayer, G

    M. Bayer, G. Ortner, O. Stern, A. Kuther, A. A. Gor- bunov, A. Forchel, P. Hawrylak, S. Fafard, K. Hinzer, T. L. Reinecke, S. N. Walck, J. P. Reithmaier, F. Klopf, and F. Sch¨ afer, Fine structure of neutral and charged ex- citons in self-assembled in(ga)as/(al)gaas quantum do...

    2002

  22. [30]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics 86, 1391 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    Barzanjeh, A

    S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, S. Gr¨ oblacher, M. Paternostro, C. A. Regal, and E. M. Weig, Optomechanics for quan- tum technologies, Nature Physics 18, 15 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Metcalfe, S

    M. Metcalfe, S. M. Carr, A. Muller, G. S. Solomon, and J. Lawall, Resolved sideband emission of inas/gaas quan- tum dots strained by surface acoustic waves, Physical Review Letters 105, 037401 (2010)

    2010

  25. [33]

    Yeo, P.-L

    I. Yeo, P.-L. de Assis, A. Gloppe, E. Dupont-Ferrier, P. Verlot, N. S. Malik, E. Dupuy, J. Claudon, J.-M. G´ erard, A. Auff` eves, G. Nogues, S. Seidelin, J.-P. Poizat, O. Arcizet, and M. Richard, Strain-mediated coupling in a quantum dot–mechanical oscillator hybrid system, Na...

    2014

  26. [34]

    Imany, Z

    P. Imany, Z. Wang, R. A. DeCrescent, R. C. Boutelle, C. A. McDonald, T. Autry, S. Berweger, P. Kabos, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and K. L. Silverman, Quantum phase modulation with acoustic cavities and quantum dots, Op- tica 9, 501 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    D. A. Golter, T. Oo, M. Amezcua, K. A. Stewart, and H. Wang, Optomechanical quantum control of a nitrogen- vacancy center in diamond, Physical Review Letters 116, 143602 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    K. W. Lee, D. Lee, P. Ovartchaiyapong, J. Minguzzi, J. R. Maze, and A. C. Bleszynski Jayich, Strain coupling of a mechanical resonator to a single quantum emitter in diamond, Physical Review Applied 6, 034005 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    R. Ohta, L. Herpin, V. M. Bastidas, T. Tawara, H. Yam- aguchi, and H. Okamoto, Rare-earth-mediated optome- chanical system in the reversed dissipation regime, Phys- ical Review Letters 126, 047404 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    M. K. Zalalutdinov, J. T. Robinson, J. J. Fonseca, S. W. LaGasse, T. Pandey, L. R. Lindsay, T. L. Reinecke, D. M. Photiadis, J. C. Culbertson, C. D. Cress, and B. H. Houston, Acoustic cavities in 2d heterostructures, Na- ture Communications 12, 3267 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    S. D. Patel, K. Parto, M. Choquer, N. Lewis, S. Umezawa, L. Hellman, D. Polishchuk, and G. Moody, Surface acoustic wave cavity optomechanics with atom- ically thin $h$-bn and ${\mathrm{wse}} {2}$ single- photon emitters, PRX Quantum 5, 010330 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Zhou and S

    P. Zhou and S. Swain, Ultranarrow spectral lines via quantum interference, Physical Review Letters 77, 3995 (1996)

    1996

  33. [41]

    Paspalakis and P

    E. Paspalakis and P. L. Knight, Phase control of sponta- neous emission, Physical Review Letters 81, 293 (1998)

    1998

  34. [42]

    S. E. Harris, Lasers without inversion: Interference of lifetime-broadened resonances, Physical Review Letters 62, 1033 (1989)

    1989

  35. [43]

    Zhou and S

    P. Zhou and S. Swain, Quantum interference in probe absorption: Narrow resonances, transparency, and gain without population inversion, Physical Review Letters 78, 832 (1997)

    1997

  36. [44]

    Senellart, G

    P. Senellart, G. Solomon, and A. White, High- performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources, Nature Nanotechnology 12, 1026 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    R. A. DeCrescent, Z. Wang, J. T. Bush, P. Imany, A. Kwiatkowski, D. V. Reddy, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and K. L. Silverman, Coherent dynamics in an optical quantum dot with phonons and photons, Optica 11, 1526 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    M. Weiß, D. Wigger, M. N¨ agele, K. M¨ uller, J. J. Finley, T. Kuhn, P. Machnikowski, and H. J. Krenner, Optome- chanical wave mixing by a single quantum dot, Optica 8, 291 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Kabuss, A

    J. Kabuss, A. Carmele, T. Brandes, and A. Knorr, Op- tically driven quantum dots as source of coherent cavity phonons: A proposal for a phonon laser scheme, Physical Review Letters 109, 054301 (2012)

    2012

  40. [48]

    R. A. DeCrescent, Z. Wang, P. Imany, R. C. Boutelle, C. A. McDonald, T. Autry, J. D. Teufel, S. W. Nam, R. P. Mirin, and K. L. Silverman, Large single-phonon op- tomechanical coupling between quantum dots and tightly confined surface acoustic waves in the quantum regime, 8 Phys...

    2022

  41. [49]

    Tsuchimoto, Z

    Y. Tsuchimoto, Z. Sun, E. Togan, S. F¨ alt, W. Wegschei- der, A. Wallraff, K. Ensslin, A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, and M. Kro- ner, Large-bandwidth transduction between an optical single quantum dot molecule and a superconducting res- onator, PRX Quantum 3, 030336 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    S. G. Carter, A. S. Bracker, G. W. Bryant, M. Kim, C. S. Kim, M. K. Zalalutdinov, M. K. Yakes, C. Czarnocki, J. Casara, M. Scheibner, and D. Gammon, Spin- mechanical coupling of an inas quantum dot embedded in a mechanical resonator, Physical Review Letters 121, 246801 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    Groll, D

    D. Groll, D. Wigger, M. Weiß, M. Yuan, A. Kuznetsov, A. Hern´ andez-M ´ ınguez, H. J. Krenner, T. Kuhn, and P. Machnikowski, Acousto-optical floquet engineering of a single-photon emitter (2025), arXiv:2509.09559 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    2025

  44. [52]

    Z. Wang, R. A. DeCrescent, P. Imany, J. T. Bush, D. V. Reddy, S. Woo Nam, R. P. Mirin, and K. L. Silverman, Gated inas quantum dots embedded in surface acous- tic wave cavities for low-noise optomechanics, Optics Ex- press 32, 38384 (2024) . Supplementary Information: Dynamica...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.