pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.25985 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-30 · 🪐 quant-ph

Nonreciprocal superradiant quantum phase transition induced by the magnon Kerr effect

Guo-Qiang Zhang , Si-Yan Lin , Wei Feng , Lijiong Shen , Yi-Hao Kang , Wei Xiong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 12:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords nonreciprocal SQPTmagnon Kerr effectcavity magnonicsYIG sphereparametric drivingsteady-state phase diagramcrystallographic axis alignmentsuperradiant transition
0
0 comments X

The pith

Flipping the sign of the magnon Kerr coefficient by crystal axis alignment produces a nonreciprocal superradiant quantum phase transition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes realizing a nonreciprocal superradiant quantum phase transition in a cavity magnonic system by exploiting the magnon Kerr effect in a yttrium iron garnet sphere coupled to cavity photons. The Kerr coefficient is positive for bias field alignment along the [100] crystallographic axis but negative along the [110] axis. This sign change alone produces markedly different steady-state phase diagrams, so the critical strength of the parametric drive at which the superradiant transition occurs depends on the chosen axis. The authors quantify the resulting nonreciprocity with a bidirectional contrast ratio and note possible use in nonreciprocal quantum devices.

Core claim

In a cavity magnonic system the magnon Kerr effect produces a nonreciprocal superradiant quantum phase transition because the steady-state phase diagram obtained for positive Kerr coefficient differs from the diagram obtained for negative coefficient; consequently the critical parametric-drive threshold for the transition is distinct for the two signs, which are realized by aligning the bias magnetic field along the [100] versus [110] crystallographic axes.

What carries the argument

The magnon Kerr effect whose coefficient changes sign with crystallographic axis alignment of the bias field, thereby generating qualitatively distinct steady-state phase boundaries under parametric driving.

If this is right

  • The critical threshold for the superradiant transition depends on the sign of the Kerr coefficient.
  • Steady-state magnon occupation and its fluctuations exhibit qualitatively different behavior for K > 0 and K < 0.
  • A bidirectional contrast ratio can be used to quantify the degree of nonreciprocity.
  • The mechanism supplies an alternative route to nonreciprocal superradiant behavior that does not require engineered nonreciprocal couplings or a spinning cavity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sign-controlled mechanism may be testable in other hybrid systems that possess a tunable Kerr-like nonlinearity.
  • Varying the physical orientation of the YIG sphere while monitoring the drive threshold offers a direct experimental check.
  • If confirmed, the approach could simplify fabrication of direction-sensitive elements for quantum information processing.

Load-bearing premise

The sign of the magnon Kerr coefficient by itself is sufficient to produce qualitatively different steady-state phase boundaries when the system is driven parametrically.

What would settle it

Observation of identical critical parametric drive strengths for the superradiant transition in both [100] and [110] alignments would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.25985 by Guo-Qiang Zhang, Lijiong Shen, Si-Yan Lin, Wei Feng, Wei Xiong, Yi-Hao Kang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the proposed cavity magnonic system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Steady-state phase diagram of the cavity magnonic system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a),(b) Scaled steady-state magnon numbers [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Bidirectional contrast ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recently, proposals for realizing a nonreciprocal superradiant quantum phase transition (SQPT) have been put forward, based on either nonreciprocal interactions between two spin ensembles or the Sagnac-Fizeau shift in a spinning cavity. However, experimental implementation of such a nonreciprocal SQPT remains challenging. This motivates the search for new mechanisms capable of producing a nonreciprocal SQPT. Here, we propose an alternative approach to realize a nonreciprocal SQPT, induced by the magnon Kerr effect (MKE), in a cavity magnonic system, where magnons in a yttrium iron garnet (YIG) sphere are coupled to cavity photons. The MKE coefficient is positive ($K>0$) when the bias magnetic field is aligned along the crystallographic axis [100], but negative ($K<0$) when aligned along the axis [110]. We show that the steady-state phase diagram for $K > 0$ differs markedly from that for $K < 0$. This contrast is the origin of the nonreciprocal SQPT. By further studying the steady-state magnon occupation and its fluctuations versus the parametric drive strength, we demonstrate that the SQPT becomes nonreciprocal, characterized by distinct critical thresholds for $K > 0$ and $K < 0$. Moreover, we introduce a bidirectional contrast ratio to quantify this nonreciprocal behavior. Our work provides a new mechanism for realizing the nonreciprocal SQPT, with potential applications in designing nonreciprocal quantum devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a mechanism for a nonreciprocal superradiant quantum phase transition (SQPT) in a cavity magnonic system with a YIG sphere coupled to photons. The magnon Kerr coefficient K is positive for bias field along [100] and negative along [110]; the authors show that this sign difference produces qualitatively distinct steady-state phase diagrams under parametric driving, yielding different critical thresholds for the SQPT that are quantified by a bidirectional contrast ratio.

Significance. If the modeling is correct, the work supplies a new route to nonreciprocal SQPT that exploits the independently known sign change of the Kerr coefficient in YIG rather than engineered nonreciprocal couplings or mechanical rotation. This could simplify experimental implementation in existing cavity-magnonic platforms and support applications in nonreciprocal quantum devices. The derivation from driven-dissipative equations without additional ad-hoc nonreciprocal terms is a clear strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model and equations of motion] The central claim that nonreciprocity arises exclusively from the sign change of K requires that all other parameters (magnon frequency, photon-magnon coupling, parametric drive amplitude, and rotating-frame definitions) remain identical when the bias field is rotated from [100] to [110]. The manuscript should explicitly verify that magnetocrystalline anisotropy does not introduce additional axis-dependent shifts in these quantities; otherwise the distinct critical thresholds cannot be attributed solely to sign(K).
  2. [Steady-state phase diagram and critical thresholds] The steady-state phase diagrams and critical thresholds for K > 0 versus K < 0 are presented as markedly different, yet the text provides no explicit form of the mean-field equations, numerical integration method, or stability analysis used to locate the boundaries. Without these details the quantitative contrast ratio and the claimed nonreciprocity remain difficult to reproduce or assess for robustness.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces the 'bidirectional contrast ratio' without a brief definition or equation reference; adding one sentence would improve immediate clarity for readers.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state which curves correspond to K > 0 and K < 0 and indicate the value of the contrast ratio extracted from each panel.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our work and for the constructive comments that will help improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model and equations of motion] The central claim that nonreciprocity arises exclusively from the sign change of K requires that all other parameters (magnon frequency, photon-magnon coupling, parametric drive amplitude, and rotating-frame definitions) remain identical when the bias field is rotated from [100] to [110]. The manuscript should explicitly verify that magnetocrystalline anisotropy does not introduce additional axis-dependent shifts in these quantities; otherwise the distinct critical thresholds cannot be attributed solely to sign(K).

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on isolating the effect of sign(K). In the manuscript we rely on the well-documented experimental fact that rotating the bias field between the [100] and [110] axes in a YIG sphere primarily reverses the sign of the Kerr coefficient while the linear magnon frequency and the photon-magnon coupling strength remain essentially unchanged under typical experimental conditions (see, e.g., the references cited in Sec. II). Nevertheless, to make this assumption fully explicit, we will add a short paragraph and a supplementary note in the revised version that (i) recalls the relevant magnetocrystalline anisotropy terms, (ii) shows that any residual axis-dependent frequency shifts are absorbed into the rotating-frame detuning, and (iii) confirms that the parametric drive amplitude and coupling g are kept identical by construction in the two cases. This addition will strengthen the attribution of the nonreciprocity to sign(K) alone. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Steady-state phase diagram and critical thresholds] The steady-state phase diagrams and critical thresholds for K > 0 versus K < 0 are presented as markedly different, yet the text provides no explicit form of the mean-field equations, numerical integration method, or stability analysis used to locate the boundaries. Without these details the quantitative contrast ratio and the claimed nonreciprocity remain difficult to reproduce or assess for robustness.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of these technical details hinders reproducibility. In the revised manuscript we will insert a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that (i) derives the semiclassical mean-field equations from the driven-dissipative master equation, (ii) states the numerical method employed to obtain the steady-state solutions (fixed-point iteration of the nonlinear algebraic system), and (iii) describes the linear stability analysis used to determine the phase boundaries. With these additions the calculation of the bidirectional contrast ratio will be fully transparent and independently verifiable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Nonreciprocity derived from sign of known Kerr coefficient via standard driven-dissipative equations

full rationale

The paper takes the independently established sign change of the magnon Kerr coefficient K in YIG (positive for [100], negative for [110]) as an external physical input. It then incorporates this signed K term into the cavity-magnon Hamiltonian and the corresponding driven-dissipative master equation or mean-field equations. Steady-state solutions and critical thresholds for the superradiant quantum phase transition are obtained by solving these equations, yielding distinct phase boundaries solely due to the sign of K. No derivation step reduces to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or redefinition of the target nonreciprocity; the contrast in phase diagrams follows directly from the equations without circularity. The result is self-contained against external benchmarks for the Kerr sign and standard magnon-photon dynamics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard cavity-magnon coupling and driven-dissipative steady-state analysis together with the established material property that the Kerr coefficient in YIG reverses sign between [100] and [110] axes.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The system is described by standard cavity quantum electrodynamics and magnon-photon interaction Hamiltonians under parametric driving and dissipation.
    The phase diagram and thresholds are obtained within this conventional framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5826 in / 1274 out tokens · 55038 ms · 2026-05-18T12:36:04.732149+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    or [110] (see the red-arrowed lines) of the YIG sphere. TABLE I. The parameter conditions (PCs) for|M| 2 ± >0 in both cases ofK>0 andK<0, where the solution|M| 2 =|M| 2 − (|M| 2 =|M| 2 +) is unstable for all parameter values in the case ofK>0 (K<0) and not considered here. nonnegativity constraint PCs forK>0 PCs forK<0 |M| 2 + >0 Ω>Ω 1 for∆ m/∆a < ξ; Ω>Ω ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    2 and related discussions)

    Table I summarizes the conditions for|M| 2 + >0 whenK> 0 and|M| 2 − >0 whenK<0, where we exclude the trivial solutions|M| 2 =|M| 2 − whenK>0 and|M| 2 =|M| 2 + when K<0 due to their instability across all parameters (see Fig. 2 and related discussions). ForK>0, the constraint|M| 2 + >0 requiresΩ>Ω 1 when∆ m/∆a < ξorΩ>Ω 2 for∆ m/∆a > ξ, with the critical ra...

    work page

  3. [3]

    The action of the flux-driven JPA on the CWR is well described by a parametric drive Hamiltonian [cf

    and [110] crystallographic axes of the YIG sphere, cor- responding to positive and negative MKE coefficients, respec- tively. The action of the flux-driven JPA on the CWR is well described by a parametric drive Hamiltonian [cf. the last term in Eq. (A1)] [77, 78], where the drive strength (e.g., tunable from 0 to 6 MHz [79]) and frequency can be precisely...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Hepp and E

    K. Hepp and E. H. Lieb, On the superradiant phase transition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: The Dicke maser model, Ann. Phys.76, 360 (1973)

    work page 1973

  5. [5]

    Y . K. Wang and F. T. Hioe, Phase transition in the dicke model of superradiance, Phys. Rev. A7, 831 (1973)

    work page 1973

  6. [6]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes, Phys. Rev.93, 99 (1954)

    work page 1954

  7. [7]

    Emary and T

    C. Emary and T. Brandes, Quantum Chaos Triggered by Precur- sors of a Quantum Phase Transition: The Dicke Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 044101 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Emary and T

    C. Emary and T. Brandes, Chaos and the quantum phase transi- tion in the Dicke model, Phys. Rev. E67, 066203 (2003)

    work page 2003

  9. [9]

    Casta ˜nos, R

    O. Casta ˜nos, R. L´opez-Pe˜na, E. Nahmad-Achar, J. G. Hirsch, E. L´opez-Moreno, and J. E. Vitela, Coherent state description of the ground state in the Tavis-Cummings model and its quantum phase transitions, Phys. Scr.79, 065405 (2009)

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    J. H. Zou, T. Liu, M. Feng, W. L. Yang, C. Y . Chen, and J. Twamley, Quantum phase transition in a driven Tavis- Cummings model, New J. Phys.15, 123032 (2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Ashhab, Superradiance transition in a system with a single qubit and a single oscillator, Phys

    S. Ashhab, Superradiance transition in a system with a single qubit and a single oscillator, Phys. Rev. A87, 013826 (2013)

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    M. J. Hwang, R. Puebla, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum Phase Transition and Universal Dynamics in the Rabi Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 180404 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    M. J. Hwang and M. B. Plenio, Quantum Phase Transition in the Finite Jaynes-Cummings Lattice Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 123602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Liu and J

    C. Liu and J. F. Huang, Quantum phase transition of the Jaynes- Cummings model, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron.67, 210311 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    G. Q. Zhang, Z. Chen, W. Xiong, C. H. Lam, and J. Q. You, Parity-symmetry-breaking quantum phase transition via para- metric drive in a cavity magnonic system, Phys. Rev. B104, 064423 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Y . Qin, S. C. Li, K. Li, and J. J. Song, Controllable quantum phase transition in a double-cavity magnonic system, Phys. Rev. B106, 054419 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    B. Wang, F. Nori, and Z. L. Xiang, Quantum Phase Transi- tions in Optomechanical Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 053601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Baumann, C

    K. Baumann, C. Guerlin, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cav- ity, Nature464, 1301 (2010)

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Baumann, R

    K. Baumann, R. Mottl, F. Brennecke, and T. Esslinger, Explor- ing Symmetry Breaking at the Dicke Quantum Phase Transi- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 140402 (2011)

    work page 2011

  20. [20]

    Brennecke, R

    F. Brennecke, R. Mottl, K. Baumann, R. Landig, T. Donner, and T. Esslinger, Real-time observation of fluctuations at the driven- dissipative Dicke phase transition, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 11763 (2013)

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    M. P. Baden, K. J. Arnold, A. L. Grimsmo, S. Parkins, and M. D. Barrett, Realization of the Dicke Model Using Cavity- Assisted Raman Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 020408 (2014)

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y . Chen, Z. Wu, J. Wang, J. Fan, S. Deng, and H. Wu, Observation of a superradiant quantum phase transition in an intracavity degenerate Fermi gas, Science373, 1359 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Z. Wu, J. Fan, X. Zhang, J. Qi, and H. Wu, Signatures of Prethermalization in a Quenched Cavity-Mediated Long-Range Interacting Fermi Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 243401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    M. Feng, Y . P. Zhong, T. Liu, L. L. Yan, W. L. Yang, J. Twamley, and H. Wang, Exploring the quantum critical behav- ior in a driven Tavis-Cummings circuit, Nat. Commun.6, 7111 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    R. H. Zheng, W. Ning, Y . H. Chen, J. H. L ¨u, L. T. Shen, K. Xu, Y . R. Zhang, D. Xu, H. Li, Y . Xia, F. Wu, Z. B. Yang, A. Miranowicz, N. Lambert, D. Zheng, H. Fan, F. Nori, and S. B. Zheng, Observation of a Superradiant Phase Transition with Emergent Cat States, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 113601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    W. Ning, R. H. Zheng, J. H. L ¨u, F. Wu, Z. B. Yang, and S. B. Zheng, Experimental observation of spontaneous symmetry breaking in a quantum phase transition, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron.67, 220312 (2024). 7

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    M. L. Cai, Z. D. Liu, W. D. Zhao, Y . K. Wu, Q. X. Mei, Y . Jiang, L. He, X. Zhang, Z. C. Zhou, and L. M. Duan, Observation of a quantum phase transition in the quantum Rabi model with a single trapped ion, Nat. Commun.12, 1126 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    X. Zhao, Q. Bin, W. Hou, Y . Li, Y . Li, Y . Lin, X. Y . L¨u, and J. Du, Experimental Observation of Parity-Symmetry-Protected Phenomena in the Quantum Rabi Model with a Trapped Ion, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 193604 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    X. Chen, Z. Wu, M. Jiang, X. Y . L ¨u, X. Peng, and J. Du, Ex- perimental quantum simulation of superradiant phase transition beyond no-go theorem via antisqueezing, Nat. Commun.12, 6281 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    Z. Wu, C. Hu, T. Wang, Y . Chen, Y . Li, L. Zhao, X. Y . L¨u, and X. Peng, Experimental Quantum Simulation of Multicriticality in Closed and Open Rabi Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 173602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Fruchart, R

    M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V . Vitelli, Non- reciprocal phase transitions, Nature592, 363 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Barzanjeh, A

    S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, A. Al `u, S. A. Mann, N. Nefedkin, V . Peano, and P. Rabl, Nonreciprocity in Quantum Technology, arXiv:2508.03945

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Barzanjeh, M

    S. Barzanjeh, M. Aquilina, and A. Xuereb, Manipulating the Flow of Thermal Noise in Quantum Devices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 060601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal Photon Trans- mission and Amplification Via Reservoir Engineering, Phys. Rev. X5, 021025 (2015)

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    D. Malz, L. D. T ´oth, N. R. Bernier, A. K. Feofanov, T. J. Kip- penberg, and A. Nunnenkamp, Quantum-Limited Directional Amplifiers with Optomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 023601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Z. Shen, Y . L. Zhang, Y . Chen, F. W. Sun, X. B. Zou, G. C. Guo, C. L. Zou, and C. H. Dong, Reconfigurable optomechan- ical circulator and directional amplifier, Nat. Commun.9, 1797 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Huang, A

    R. Huang, A. Miranowicz, J. Q. Liao, F. Nori, and H. Jing, Nonreciprocal Photon Blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 153601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    Y . Wang, W. Xiong, Z. Xu, G. Q. Zhang, and J. Q. You, Dissipation-induced nonreciprocal magnon blockade in a magnon-based hybrid system, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 260314 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    E. I. R. Chiacchio, A. Nunnenkamp, and M. Brunelli, Nonre- ciprocal Dicke Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 113602 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    G. L. Zhu, C. S. Hu, H. Wang, W. Qin, X. Y . L ¨u, and F. Nori, Nonreciprocal Superradiant Phase Transitions and Multicriti- cality in a Cavity QED System, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 193602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Y . J. Xu, L. H. Zhai, P. Fu, S. J. Cheng, and G. Q. Zhang, Non- reciprocal quantum phase transition in cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. A110, 043704 (2024)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    ¨O. O. Soykal and M. E. Flatt ´e, Strong Field Interactions be- tween a Nanomagnet and a Photonic Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 077202 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    Huebl, C

    H. Huebl, C. W. Zollitsch, J. Lotze, F. Hocke, M. Greifenstein, A. Marx, R. Gross, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, High Coopera- tivity in Coupled Microwave Resonator Ferrimagnetic Insulator Hybrids, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 127003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y . Tabuchi, S. Ishino, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y . Nakamura, Hybridizing Ferromagnetic Magnons and Mi- crowave Photons in the Quantum Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 083603 (2014)

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    Zhang, C

    X. Zhang, C. L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Strongly Cou- pled Magnons and Cavity Microwave Photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 156401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Goryachev, W

    M. Goryachev, W. G. Farr, D. L. Creedon, Y . Fan, M. Kostylev, and M. E. Tobar, High-Cooperativity Cavity QED with Magnons at Microwave Frequencies, Phys. Rev. Appl.2, 054002 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    Zhang, X

    D. Zhang, X. M. Wang, T. F. Li, X. Q. Luo, W. Wu, F. Nori, and J. Q. You, Cavity quantum electrodynamics with ferromagnetic magnons in a small yttrium-iron-garnet sphere, npj Quantum Inf.1, 15014 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    Zhang, C

    X. Zhang, C. L. Zou, N. Zhu, F. Marquardt, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Magnon dark modes and gradient memory, Nat. Com- mun.6, 8914 (2015)

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    L. Bai, M. Harder, Y . P. Chen, X. Fan, J. Q. Xiao, and C. M. Hu, Spin Pumping in Electrodynamically Coupled Magnon-Photon Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 227201 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    Lachance-Quirion, Y

    D. Lachance-Quirion, Y . Tabuchi, A. Gloppe, K. Usami, and Y . Nakamura, Hybrid quantum systems based on magnonics, Appl. Phys. Express12, 070101 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    B. Z. Rameshti, S. V . Kusminskiy, J. A. Haigh, K. Usami, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y . Nakamura, C. M. Hu, H. X. Tang, G. E. W. Bauer, and Y . M. Blanter, Cavity magnonics, Phys. Rep. 979, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    H. Y . Yuan, Y . Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Quan- tum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum in- formation science, Phys. Rep.965, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Y . P. Wang, G. Q. Zhang, D. Zhang, X. Q. Luo, W. Xiong, S. P. Wang, T. F. Li, C. M. Hu, and J. Q. You, Magnon Kerr effect in a strongly coupled cavity-magnon system, Phys. Rev. B94, 224410 (2016)

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    Y . P. Wang, G. Q. Zhang, D. Zhang, T. F. Li, C. M. Hu, and J. Q. You, Bistability of Cavity Magnon Polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 057202 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    G. Q. Zhang, Y . P. Wang, and J. Q. You, Theory of the magnon Kerr effect in cavity magnonics, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. As- tron.62, 987511 (2019)

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    J. M. P. Nair, Z. Zhang, M. O. Scully, and G. S. Agarwal, Non- linear spin currents, Phys. Rev. B102, 104415 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    M. X. Bi, X. H. Yan, Y . Zhang, and Y . Xiao, Tristability of cavity magnon polaritons, Phys. Rev. B103, 104411 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    R. C. Shen, Y . P. Wang, J. Li, S. Y . Zhu, G. S. Agarwal, and J. Q. You, Long-Time Memory and Ternary Logic Gate Using a Multistable Cavity Magnonic System, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 183202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    R. C. Shen, J. Li, Z. Y . Fan, Y . P. Wang, and J. Q. You, Me- chanical Bistability in Kerr-modified Cavity Magnomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 123601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    Zhang, M

    Z. Zhang, M. O. Scully, and G. S. Agarwal, Quantum entangle- ment between two magnon modes via Kerr nonlinearity driven far from equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 023021 (2019)

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    Z. B. Yang, H. Jin, J. W. Jin, J. Y . Liu, H. Y . Liu, and R. C. Yang, Bistability of squeezing and entanglement in cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023126 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Xiong, M

    W. Xiong, M. Tian, G. Q. Zhang, and J. Q. You, Strong long- range spin-spin coupling via a Kerr magnon interface, Phys. Rev. B105, 245310 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    C. Kong, H. Xiong, and Y . Wu, Magnon-Induced Nonreciproc- ity Based on the Magnon Kerr Effect, Phys. Rev. Applied12, 034001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    Ullah and S

    M. Ullah and S. Mikki, Nonreciprocal microwave field trans- mission in a quantum magnomechanical system controlled by magnetostriction and Kerr nonlinearities, Phys. Rev. B109, 214303 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Miao and G

    Q. Miao and G. S. Agarwal, Kerr nonlinearity induced non- reciprocity in dissipatively coupled resonators, Phys. Rev. Re- 8 search6, 033020 (2024)

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    J. Chen, X. G. Fan, W. Xiong, D. Wang, and L. Ye, Nonrecipro- cal entanglement in cavity-magnon optomechanics, Phys. Rev. B108, 024105 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    J. Chen, X. G. Fan, W. Xiong, D. Wang, and L. Ye, Nonrecip- rocal photon-phonon entanglement in Kerr-modified spinning cavity magnomechanics, Phys. Rev. A109, 043512 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Ahmed, H

    R. Ahmed, H. Ali, A. Shehzad, S. K. Singh, A. Sohail, and M. C. de Oliveira, Nonreciprocal Multipartite Entanglement in a two-cavity magnomechanical system, arXiv:2405.16221

    work page arXiv

  69. [69]

    D. Kong, J. Xu, and F. Wang, Nonreciprocal entanglement of ferrimagnetic magnons and nitrogen-vacancy-center ensembles by Kerr nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. Applied21, 034061 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    M. Y . Liu, Y . Gong, J. Chen, Y . W. Wang, and W. Xiong, Non- reciprocal Microwave-Optical Entanglement in Kerr-Modified Cavity Optomagnomechanics, Chin. Phys. B34, 057202 (2025)

    work page 2025

  71. [71]

    Kong and F

    D. Kong and F. Wang, Nonreciprocal steering between optical and microwave waves by Bogoliubov cooling in a cavity opto- magnonic system, Phys. Rev. A111, 013704 (2025)

    work page 2025

  72. [72]

    H. Q. Zhang, S. S. Chu, J. S. Zhang, W. X. Zhong, and G. L. Cheng, Nonreciprocal magnon blockade based on nonlinear effects, Opt. Lett.49, 2009 (2024)

    work page 2009

  73. [73]

    X. H. Fan, Y . N. Zhang, J. P. Yu, M. Y . Liu, W. D. He, H. C. Li, and W. Xiong, Nonreciprocal Unconventional Photon Blockade with Kerr Magnons, Adv. Quantum Tech.7, 2400043 (2024)

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    D. G. Lai, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Nonreciprocal quantum synchronization, Nat. Commun.16, 8491 (2025)

    work page 2025

  75. [75]

    D. F. Walls and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Optics(Springer, Berlin, 1994)

    work page 1994

  76. [76]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik,Table of Integrals, Series and Products(Academic Press, Orlando, 1980)

    work page 1980

  77. [77]

    C. J. Zhu, L. L. Ping, Y . P. Yang, and G. S. Agarwal, Squeezed light induced symmetry breaking superradiant phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 073602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  78. [78]

    R. G. E. Morris, A. F. van Loo, S. Kosen, and A. D. Karenowska, Strong coupling of magnons in a YIG sphere to photons in a planar superconducting resonator in the quantum limit, Sci. Rep.7, 11511 (2017)

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    M. Song, T. Polakovic, J. Lim, T. W. Cecil, J. Pearson, R. Divan, W. K. Kwok, U. Welp, A. Hoffmann, K. J. Kim, V . Novosad, and Y . Li, Single-shot magnon interference in a magnon-superconducting-resonator hybrid circuit, Nat. Com- mun.16, 3649 (2025)

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    Yamamoto, K

    T. Yamamoto, K. Inomata, M. Watanabe, K. Matsuba, T. Miyazaki, W. D. Oliver, Y . Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, Flux- driven Josephson parametric amplifier, Appl. Phys. Lett.93, 042510 (2008)

    work page 2008

Showing first 80 references.