Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Free-energy variations for determinantal 2D plasmas with holes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Moving a hole in a determinantal 2D Coulomb gas leaves the correlation energy unchanged to order one, and adding holes produces an explicit topological expansion.

desk verdict Serious conditional derivation of topological log N corrections for a determinantal 2D Coulomb gas with holes; the main risk is an unproved extension of a known free-energy expansion to singular potentials, which should be made explicit. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.01745 v4 pith:QQIOAYAH submitted 2025-10-02 math-ph math.MPmath.PR

Nicolas Rougerie (UMPA-ENSL) This is my paper
classification math-phmath.MPmath.PR MSC 82B0582B2160B20
keywords 2DCoulombgasdeterminantalpointprocessGinibreensemblefreeenergyexpansiontopologicaltermspinnedchargescorrelationdropletwithholes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the free energy, beyond mean field, of a two-dimensional one-component plasma at inverse temperature two (the determinantal case), in a quadratic trap modified by clusters of pinned charges that punch holes in the equilibrium droplet. For small, well-separated holes it proves two signatures of the conjectured universal expansion: the correlation energy is unchanged, up to O(1) with exponentially small error, when a hole is moved or rotated; and the correlation energy of a system with B holes differs from the sum of B single-hole systems by the explicit topological terms (B−1)/4 N log N plus known N, log N and constant terms, independent of hole placement. The proof rests on an exact formula identifying the partition function with a reduced density of the Ginibre ensemble, replacement of finite-N kernels by the translation-invariant infinite kernel, and a clustering/decoupling estimate for the resulting determinant. A sympathetic reader would care because these are the first rigorous multi-hole, non-radial signatures of the predicted log N 'counting holes' terms in 2D Coulomb gas free energy.

What carries the argument

The working object is the exact identity (Lemma 4.1) expressing the pinned-charge partition function as the P-particle reduced density—a determinant of the Ginibre correlation kernel—evaluated at the pinned points. The argument first replaces the finite-N kernel by the infinite, translation-invariant Ginibre kernel, with exponentially small error controlled by a determinant lower bound (Lemma 4.2) that relies on the even-filling assumption (2.6). It then proves a decoupling lemma (Lemma 5.1): for well-separated clusters the large determinant factorizes into single-cluster determinants, because the Ginibre kernel decays like exp(−N|x−y|²/2) and Hadamard's inequality bounds the cross terms. Me

What would settle it

Take a concrete lattice of P = αN pinned charges in a disk and compute the difference between the left-hand side of (2.6) and its continuum expression. If this difference diverges faster than CN (e.g., has a CN log N component), the determinant lower bound of Lemma 4.2 fails and the conclusions of Theorems 2.4 and 2.6 are not guaranteed; if the difference stays O(N), the main proof's load-bearing estimate is verified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 2.6: under Assumptions 2.2 and 2.3, F_Corr,N(a_1,...,a_B) - sum_j F_Corr,N(a_j) equals (B−1)/4 N log N + (1/2)((3/2)log(2π)−1)(B−1)N + 5(B−1)/24 log N + (B−1)ζ'(-1)/2 + (B−1)log(2π)/4 + (1/24)(log(1+α) − sum_j log(1+α_j)) + O(e^{-cN}). Together with Theorem 2.4 this shows the correlation energy is independent of the holes' locations and orientations up to O(1), so the only macroscopic variation is captured by the mean-field term. The paper presents these as rigorously proven consequences, in this pinned-charge model, of the conjectured full expansion (1.8), not as a proof of that expansion itself.

Load-bearing premise

The proof collapses if Assumption 2.2(ii), equation (2.6), fails: each cluster's Coulomb energy must match the continuum energy of a uniformly filled screening region up to O(N); the paper invokes existing techniques to assert this for lattices and ground states, but does not prove it at the required precision for an explicit construction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In this model, a single hole can be translated (and, jointly with Remark 2.5, rotated) anywhere inside the droplet with the correlation energy changing by at most e^{-cN}.
  • Comparing B-hole and single-hole systems, the difference in correlation energy is the explicit, position-independent expansion of Theorem 2.6; in particular the leading correction is (B−1)/4 N log N.
  • If the term after order N in the single-hole expansion is written c_1 log N, the theorem forces the B-hole coefficient to be c_1 + 5(B−1)/24, so the log N term counts the number of holes (Remark 2.7).
  • The mean-field energy carries all dependence on hole location; the correlation corrections are universal to order one.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the same two-step mechanism (kernel replacement + decoupling) to other determinantal processes with clustering kernels—for example, the sine point process or higher-genus surfaces—would yield analogous hole-counting log terms; this is a testable research program, not part of the paper.
  • The theorem's explicit constants depend on α and α_j via log(1+α) terms; comparing these against the claim that the O(1) term is the zeta-regularized spectral determinant of the exterior Laplacian would provide a numerical check of the full conjectured expansion.
  • For β ≠ 2 no exact Ginibre formula exists; the results imply that any β≠2 analogue can only be established by different tools, and that the topological log N coefficient should remain β-independent if the prediction holds—a falsifiable statement.
  • The orientation-independence up to O(1) suggests that, in the full expansion, the shape of holes enters only through their Euler characteristic and spectral determinant, not through position or orientation; computing the spectral determinant for two hole shapes differing by rotation would test this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a determinantal 2D Coulomb gas (β=2) with external potential given by a quadratic trap plus the Coulomb potential of P pinned unit charges arranged in B well-separated clusters. The equilibrium droplet is a disk with B holes. Under Assumptions 2.2 and 2.3, the paper proves two statements about the correlation energy F_Corr,N = F_N − N^2 E_MF: Theorem 2.4 shows that for one hole the correlation energy is independent of the translation of the pinned cluster up to O(1), with exponentially small error; Theorem 2.6 shows that the difference between the correlation energy of the B-hole system and the sum of B one-hole correlation energies is given by an explicit expansion containing the topological (B−1)/4 N log N term, a linear N term, a (5(B−1)/24) log N term, and explicit constants, again with exponentially small error. The proofs are based on an exact formula (Lemma 4.1) expressing the partition function with pinned charges in terms of the Ginibre correlation kernel, followed by (i) replacement of finite-N kernels by the infinite translation-invariant Ginibre kernel, (ii) a determinant lower bound (Lemma 4.2) and a determinant decoupling lemma (Lemma 5.1), and (iii) mean-field computations from Section 3. The paper is transparent that it does not prove the full conjectured expansion (1.8); it derives its listed consequences conditional on several inputs.

Significance. If the technical inputs hold, the paper provides a nontrivial, concrete confirmation of the Zabrodin–Wiegmann/Jancovici predictions in a non-radial, multi-hole setting, and it identifies explicit 'topological' log N and O(1) terms. The use of the exact Ginibre conditioning formula, the explicit control of finite-N versus infinite-kernel errors, and the detailed mean-field calculations are strengths. The paper is also commendably explicit about the conditional nature of its main theorems. However, the significance is moderated by the fact that a load-bearing external input—the O(N) free-energy expansion (4.3) for potentials with P ∝ N point-charge singularities—is asserted rather than proved, and the paper's key assumption on the pinned-charge energy (Assumption 2.2(ii)) is not verified for any explicit configuration. The results are therefore best regarded as conditional consequences of a stronger conjecture, not fully self-contained derivations.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, Eq. (4.3)] The O(N) expansion F_N(A) = E_MF(N,N,P) − (N/4) log N + (N/2) f_β2(2) + O(N) is used for the potential (2.12) with P = ρN pinned point charges. The cited literature proves this expansion for smooth external potentials that are fixed as N→∞. The manuscript asserts that 'a careful inspection of the known proofs' extends it to the point-charge case, but supplies no such inspection. This is not a cosmetic issue: Eq. (4.3) is used in the proof of Lemma 4.2 to derive the determinant lower bound (4.7), which in turn is essential for Lemma 4.3 and Lemma 5.1. If the O(N) error is not uniform in P, the cancellations leading to (4.11) are unsupported and Theorems 2.4 and 2.6 do not follow. The author should either provide the missing proof/adaptation or explicitly add (4.3) as an assumption and state that the theorems are conditional on it.
  2. [§2.1, Assumption 2.2(ii) and §4.2] Assumption 2.2(ii), Eq. (2.6), requires that each cluster's Coulomb energy match the continuum expression with an O(P) remainder. This is a strong and non-obvious condition; the paper asserts that 'existing technology suffices' to verify it (e.g. for a lattice) but gives no proof or precise reference. Remark 3.2 discusses density approximation of the hole shape but does not establish the O(P) energy matching at the needed precision. Since the cancellations in the proof of Lemma 4.2, and hence the determinant lower bound, depend directly on (2.6), the main theorems are only as strong as this unverified hypothesis. The author should either prove (2.6) for a natural class of configurations or state clearly that the results apply only to configurations that satisfy (2.6) by assumption, with no claim that such configurations are known to exist at the required precision.
  3. [§5.1, Lemma 5.1 and its use of Lemma 4.2] The decoupling lemma is stated for the infinite-kernel matrix (5.1), but its proof invokes Lemma 4.2, which is proved for the finite-kernel matrix K_{N+P}. The transition from finite to infinite kernel is made via Lemma 4.3, whose error is exponentially small only under the lower bound of Lemma 4.2. This creates a dependence cycle: if (4.3) or Assumption 2.2(ii) fails, the lower bound in Lemma 4.2 fails, and the decoupling step in Lemma 5.1 is unsupported. This should be made explicit, and the proof should clarify that Lemma 5.1's hypotheses include the conclusions of Lemma 4.2 for both K_{N+P} and K∞. In the present form, a reader cannot tell whether the decoupling estimate is robust to a milder failure of the determinant lower bound.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (2.15)] The notation E_MF is overloaded: in (1.5) it is the normalized mean-field energy, while in Section 3 (3.1) it is the N^2-scaled functional. This makes formulas such as F_Corr,N = F_N − N^2 E_MF confusing. Please introduce separate notation or clearly state the scaling in each occurrence.
  2. [§4.1, text after Eq. (4.3)] The phrase 'a careful inspection of the known proofs shows that they carry over' is too vague for a central step. Even if the author decides to keep the argument informal, an explicit statement of which theorem in [24] or [43] is being adapted, and which norm/uniformity issue is being handled, would be helpful.
  3. [Remark 3.2] The convergence statement 'B → B̃ when the lattice spacing goes to 0' is not quantified. Since the paper elsewhere requires O(P) energy matching, it would be useful to state the topology and rate of convergence, or to state that this remark plays no role in the proofs.
  4. [Appendix A.2, Eq. (A.9)] The estimate (A.9) is said to follow by adapting [32, Lemma 3.3] from fixed B to B ∝ N. This adaptation is not trivial and should be either proved in a few lines or cited to a place where the P ∝ N case is handled.
  5. [Theorem 2.4] The phrase 'P/N and/or |A| small enough' is awkward; it should be 'assuming P/N and |A| are sufficiently small (which guarantees (2.9) in this case)'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central theorems are derived from exact Ginibre identities and external asymptotic expansions; self-citations are minor and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The main claims are not circular. Theorem 2.4 follows from the exact formula (4.4), the kernel-replacement estimate (Lemma 4.3), the translation-invariance computation (Lemma 4.4), and the mean-field gradient formula (Theorem 3.1(ii)); the target O(1) statement emerges from a cancellation between exact and mean-field terms, not from an input. Theorem 2.6 follows from the decoupling Lemma 5.1, the known Ginibre partition-function asymptotics (A.2), and the mean-field identity (5.12); the constants are computed from those external asymptotics, not fitted. The paper explicitly labels (1.8) as conjectural and states it cannot prove the full expansion; the theorems are conditional on Assumptions 2.2–2.3. Assumption 2.2(ii) is a hypothesis on the pinned-charge configuration, not an assertion of the target variation statements; the paper even acknowledges an 'apparent cyclicity' in Definition 2.1/Assumption 2.2, but this is a regularity/consistency condition, not the derived conclusion. The most exposed step is the unproved extension of the O(N) expansion (4.3) to potentials with P=ρN pinned charges ('The validity of (4.3) is usually investigated for a smooth, fixed external potential... a careful inspection of the known proofs shows that they carry over'); this is a correctness gap rather than a circular reduction, since (4.3) is weaker than the O(1)/log N target and the later cancellations are what produce the final result. Self-citations to [32], [37], and [40] are used for exact formulas and for heuristics about constructing configurations satisfying the assumptions, but the load-bearing derivation of the free-energy variations is carried out in the paper and does not reduce to those citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to data; alpha and alpha_j are model inputs characterizing cluster sizes and are required to be small. All constants in the final formulas come from known Ginibre asymptotics or exact identities. The paper's central assumptions are the strong energy-matching condition (2.6) and the separation condition (2.9), both stated explicitly.

free parameters (1)
  • alpha = P/N and alpha_j = P_j/N
    Proportions of pinned to mobile charges; assumed small enough for all estimates. They are model inputs, not fitted to data, but the proofs depend on their smallness.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Exact determinantal formula (Lemma 4.1) expressing Z_N(a) via the Ginibre correlation kernel K_{N+P}, from [1,31,32].
    Used as the starting point for all subsequent computations; taken from the literature without proof in this paper.
  • domain assumption The known O(N) free-energy expansion (4.3), proved for smooth external potentials, extends to the point-charge potential (2.12) because the singularities lie outside the droplet.
    Load-bearing for Lemma 4.2's determinant lower bound. The paper asserts the extension by 'careful inspection' but does not supply the proof.
  • standard math Ginibre partition function asymptotics with constants including zeta'(-1), as recalled in Appendix A, Eq. (A.2).
    External known formula used to identify the topological constants appearing in Theorem 2.6.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.2(ii): pinned charges evenly fill their screening regions in Coulomb-energy sense, Eq. (2.6).
    Required for the cancellations in Lemma 4.2 that yield determinant lower bounds; existence for explicit configurations is only sketched via known estimates.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.3: holes are small and sufficiently separated from each other and from the droplet boundary, Eq. (2.9)-(2.11).
    Controls the exponential clustering of the Ginibre kernel in Lemma 5.1, enabling the decoupling of multi-hole determinants.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Free-energy variations for determinantal 2D plasmas with holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QQIOAYAH

@misc{pith2026251001745,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Free-energy variations for determinantal 2D plasmas with holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QQIOAYAH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.01745}
}
abstract

We study the Gibbs equilibrium of a classical 2D Coulomb gas in the determinantal case $\beta$ = 2. The external potential is the sum of a quadratic term and the potential generated by individual charges pinned in several extended groups. This leads to an equilibrium measure (droplet) with flat density and macroscopic holes. We consider ''correlation energy'' (free energy minus its mean-field approximation) expansions, for large particle number N. Under the assumptions that the holes are sufficiently small, separated, and far from the droplet's outer boundary, we prove that (i) the correlation energy up to order 1 is independent of the holes' locations and orientations, and (ii) the difference between the correlation energies of systems differing by their number of holes essentially consists of ``topological'' O(log N) and O (1) terms.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Characteristic polynomials of complex random matrix mo dels

    A KEMANN , G., AND VERNIZZI , G. Characteristic polynomials of complex random matrix mo dels. Nuclear Physics B 660 (2003), 532–556

    2003

  2. [2]

    J., L AHIRY, S., AND SHEN, B

    A LLARD , M., F ORRESTER , P. J., L AHIRY, S., AND SHEN, B. Partition function of 2D Coulomb gases with radially symmetric potentials and a hard wall. arXiv:2 506.14738, 2025

    2025

  3. [3]

    Birth of a gap: Critical phenomena in 2d

    A LLARD , M., AND LAHIRY, S. Birth of a gap: Critical phenomena in 2d. arXiv:2509.245 29, 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    Free energy and fluctuations in the random normal matrix model with spectral gaps

    A MEUR , Y., C HARLIER , C., AND CRONVALL, J. Free energy and fluctuations in the random normal matrix model with spectral gaps. arXiv:2312.13904, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Fluctuations of eigenvalues of random normal matrices

    A MEUR , Y., H EDENMALM , H., AND MAKAROV, N. Fluctuations of eigenvalues of random normal matrices. Duke Mathematical Journal 159 (2011), 31–81

    2011

  6. [6]

    W., G UIONNET , A., AND ZEITOUNI , O

    A NDERSON , G. W., G UIONNET , A., AND ZEITOUNI , O. An introduction to random matrices , vol. 118 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010

    2010

  7. [7]

    The two-dimensional Coulomb plasma: quasi-free approximation and central limit theore m

    B AUERSCHMIDT , R., B OURGADE , P., N IKULA , M., AND YAU, H.-T. The two-dimensional Coulomb plasma: quasi-free approximation and central limit theore m. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 23, 4 (2016)

    2016

  8. [8]

    Local density for two-dimensional one-component plasma

    B AUERSCHMIDT , R., B OURGADE , P., N IKULA , M., AND YAU, H.-T. Local density for two-dimensional one-component plasma. Communications in Mathematical Physics 356 , 1 (2017), 189–230

    2017

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Asymptotic expansion of /u1D6FDmatrix models in the one-cut regime

    B OROT, G., AND GUIONNET , A. Asymptotic expansion of /u1D6FDmatrix models in the one-cut regime. Communications in Mathematical Physics 317 , 2 (2013), 447–483

    2013

  2. [10]

    Asymptotic expansion of matrix models in the multi-cut regime

    B OROT, G., AND GUIONNET , A. Asymptotic expansion of matrix models in the multi-cut regime. Forum of Mathematics, Sigma 12 (2024), e13

    2024

  3. [11]

    Free energy of the Coulomb gas in the determinantal case o n riemann surfaces

    B OURGOIN , L. Free energy of the Coulomb gas in the determinantal case o n riemann surfaces. arXiv:2508.20598, 2025

    2025

  4. [12]

    S., D RAGNEV, P

    B RAUCHART , J. S., D RAGNEV, P. D., SAFF, E. B., AND WOMERSLEY , R. S. Logarithmic and Riesz Equi- librium for Multiple Sources on the Sphere: The Exceptional Case. Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 179–203

    2018

  5. [13]

    Anomalous free energy expansions of planar Coulomb g ases: multi-component and con- formal singularity

    B YUN, S.-S. Anomalous free energy expansions of planar Coulomb g ases: multi-component and con- formal singularity . arXiv:2508.00316, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Precise large deviations in geometric last passage percolation

    B YUN, S.-S., C HARLIER , C., M OREILLON , P., AND SIMM, N. Precise large deviations in geometric last passage percolation. arXiv:2510.17470, 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    Properties of the one-component Coulomb gas on a spher e with two macroscopic external charges

    B YUN, S.-S., F ORRESTER , P., AND S., L. Properties of the one-component Coulomb gas on a spher e with two macroscopic external charges. Pure Appl. Funct. Anal. (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Partition functions of determinantal and Pfaffian Cou lomb gases with radially symmetric potentials

    B YUN, S.-S., K ANG, N., AND SEO, S.-M. Partition functions of determinantal and Pfaffian Cou lomb gases with radially symmetric potentials. Comm. Math. Phys. 401 (2023), 1627–1663

    2023

  9. [17]

    Lemniscate ensembles with spectral singularity

    B YUN, S.-S., L EE, S.-Y., AND YANG, M. Lemniscate ensembles with spectral singularity. arXiv:2107.07221, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Free energy expansions of a conditional GinUE and large deviations of the smallest eigenvalue of the LUE

    B YUN, S.-S., S EO, S.-M., AND YANG, M. Free energy expansions of a conditional GinUE and large deviations of the smallest eigenvalue of the LUE. arXiv:240 2.18983, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Exact and asymptotic features of the edge density profile for the one component plasma in two dimen sions

    C AN, T., F ORRESTER , P., T ÉLLEZ , G., AND WIEGMANN , P. Exact and asymptotic features of the edge density profile for the one component plasma in two dimen sions. Journal of Statistical Physics 158 (2015), 1147–1180

    2015

  12. [20]

    Finite-size dependence of the free energy in two-dimens ional critical systems

    C ARDY, J., AND PESCHEL , I. Finite-size dependence of the free energy in two-dimens ional critical systems. Nuclear Physics B 300 (1988), 377–392

    1988

  13. [21]

    Large gap asymptotics on annuli in the random normal matr ix model

    C HARLIER , C. Large gap asymptotics on annuli in the random normal matr ix model. Mathematische Annalen 388 (2024), 3529–3587

    2024

  14. [22]

    A vector equilibrium problem for symmetrically located point charges on a sphere

    C RIADO DEL REY, J., AND KUIJLAARS , A. A vector equilibrium problem for symmetrically located point charges on a sphere. Constructive Approximation 55 (2022), 775–827

    2022

  15. [23]

    F ORRESTER , P. J. Log-gases and random matrices, vol. 34 of London Mathematical Society Monographs Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2010. 32 N. ROUGERIE

    2010

  16. [24]

    J., AND BYUN, S.-S

    F ORRESTER , P. J., AND BYUN, S.-S. Progress on the study of the Ginibre ensembles , vol. 3 of KIAS Springer Series in Mathematics . Springer, 2025

    2025

  17. [25]

    Selected topics on quadrature domains

    G USTAFSSON , B., AND PUTINAR , M. Selected topics on quadrature domains. Physica D. 235 (2007), 247–269

    2007

  18. [26]

    G USTAFSSON , B., AND SHAPIRO, H. S. What is a quadrature domain ? In Quadrature Domains and Applications. Birkh˝auser, 2005

    2005

  19. [27]

    Coulomb systems seen as critical systems: Finite-size effects in two dimensions

    J ANCOVICI, B., M ANIFICAT, G., AND PISANI, C. Coulomb systems seen as critical systems: Finite-size effects in two dimensions. Journal of Statistical Physics 76 , 1/2 (1994), 307–329

    1994

  20. [28]

    Universal free energy correction for the two-dimension al one- component plasma

    J ANCOVICI, B., AND TRIZAC, E. Universal free energy correction for the two-dimension al one- component plasma. Physica A 284 (2000), 241–245

    2000

  21. [29]

    Geometry and large N limits in Laughlin states

    K LEVTSOV, S. Geometry and large N limits in Laughlin states. arXiv:16 08.02928, 2016

    2016

  22. [30]

    Quantum Hall effect and Quillen metric

    K LEVTSOV, S., M A, X., M ARINESCU , G., AND WIEGMANN , P. Quantum Hall effect and Quillen metric. Communications in Mathematical Physics 349 (2017), 815–855

    2017

  23. [31]

    The law of large numbers for the maximum of the characteristic polynomial of the Ginibre ensemble

    L AMBERT , G. The law of large numbers for the maximum of the characteristic polynomial of the Ginibre ensemble. Communications in Mathematical Physics (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    On quantum statistics transmutation via magnetic flux attachment

    L AMBERT , G., L UNDHOLM , D., AND ROUGERIE , N. On quantum statistics transmutation via magnetic flux attachment. Probability and Mathematical Physics 4 , 4 (2023), 803–848

    2023

  25. [33]

    Large deviation principle for empirical fields of Log and Riesz gases

    L EBLÉ , T., AND SERFATY, S. Large deviation principle for empirical fields of Log and Riesz gases. Inventiones mathematicae 210, 3 (2017), 645–757

    2017

  26. [34]

    Fluctuations of two-dimensional Coulomb gases

    L EBLÉ , T., AND SERFATY, S. Fluctuations of two-dimensional Coulomb gases. Geometric and Func- tional Analysis (GAFA) 28, 2 (2018), 443–508

    2018

  27. [35]

    Coulomb and Riesz gases: The known and the unknown

    L EWIN, M. Coulomb and Riesz gases: The known and the unknown. arXiv :2202.09240, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    H., AND LOSS, M

    L IEB, E. H., AND LOSS, M. Analysis, 2nd ed., vol. 14 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001

    2001

  29. [37]

    H., R OUGERIE , N., AND YNGVASON, J

    L IEB, E. H., R OUGERIE , N., AND YNGVASON, J. Local incompressibility estimates for the Laughlin phase. Communications in Mathematical Physics 365 , 2 (2019), 431–470

    2019

  30. [38]

    P., AND SINGER, I

    M C KEAN, H. P., AND SINGER, I. M. Curvature and the eigenvalues of the Laplacian. Journal of Differential Geometry 1 (1967), 43–69

    1967

  31. [39]

    The classical Jellium and the Laughlin phase

    R OUGERIE , N. The classical Jellium and the Laughlin phase. In The Physics and Mathematics of Elliott Lieb. EMS Press, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    The Laughlin liquid in an external potential

    R OUGERIE , N., AND YNGVASON, J. The Laughlin liquid in an external potential. Letters in Mathematical Physics 108, 4 (2018), 1007–1029

    2018

  33. [41]

    B., AND TOTIK, V

    S AFF, E. B., AND TOTIK, V. Logarithmic potentials with external fields , vol. 316 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997. Appendix B by Thomas Bloom

    1997

  34. [42]

    Quadrature domains

    S AKAI, M. Quadrature domains. Lecture notes in mathematics. Springer, 1982

    1982

  35. [43]

    Lectures on Coulomb and Riesz gases

    S ERFATY, S. Lectures on Coulomb and Riesz gases. arXiv:2407.21194, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Geometric zabrodin-wiegmann conjecture for integer Qu antum Hall states

    S HEN, S., AND YU, J. Geometric zabrodin-wiegmann conjecture for integer Qu antum Hall states. arXiv:2501.10530, 2025

    2025

  37. [45]

    Large- /u1D45Bexpansion for the 2D Dyson gas

    Z ABRODIN , A., AND WIEGMANN , P. Large- /u1D45Bexpansion for the 2D Dyson gas. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 39 (2006), 8933. ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE DE LYON & CNRS, UMPA (UMR 5669) Email address: nicolas.rougerie@ens-lyon.fr

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.