Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 72 references

Gendered Cultural Discourse in Japan across the Prewar-Postwar Transition: Evidence from Historical Word Embeddings

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Female stereotypes rise across Japanese domains after 1945

desk verdict The empirical core is real and worth knowing about, but the abstract contradicts the paper's own results on the Home domain, the 1945 reversal is asserted without a test, and the frequency confound in Appendix A cuts against the central measurement. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.03905 v2 pith:QK52DVFB submitted 2025-10-04 cs.CY

Shintaro Sakai , Haewoon Kwak , Jisun An , Akira Matsui This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CY
keywords wordembeddingsgenderstereotypesJapanhistoricalcorporalinguisticchangerolescensusvalidationpostwarreforms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether Japan's post-1945 legal reforms—granting women the vote, constitutional equality, and labor protections—actually moved gendered language. It trains separate word-embedding models for each year from 1900 to 1999 on a large corpus of digitized Japanese books and magazines, then measures how close domain words sit to female versus male terms. The measurements show all three domains—Home, Work, Politics—becoming more female-associated after 1945; Work and Politics flip from male- to female-stereotyped by the 1970s, while Home remains the most female-stereotyped domain throughout. A census validation shows occupations with more women have higher female stereotype scores, so the language measure tracks real demographics. The paper interprets this as women's public roles being added to, not replacing, domestic ones.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a series of yearly skip-gram word-embedding models (vector representations learned from word co-occurrence in a five-word context window) trained on Japanese n-gram frequency data. The paper computes a female stereotype value for each target word as the mean cosine similarity to female attribute words minus the mean cosine similarity to male attribute words, averaged over the words in a domain or occupation list, with bootstrap confidence intervals. To separate genuine domain change from a decade-long rise in female association across the entire vocabulary, it subtracts the corpus-wide average stereotype each year to produce an adjusted score. This adjusted-score mac

What would settle it

Rerun the stereotype calculation with 彼(he) and 彼女(she) removed from the male and female attribute lists, or with the attribute lists frequency-matched year by year. If the post-1945 rise in Home, Work, and Politics disappears or reverses, then the paper's finding is an artifact of lexical-frequency shifts in Japanese writing rather than a genuine change in gender stereotypes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that gendered cultural discourse in Japan shifted unevenly across the prewar-postwar transition, and that this shift is measurable in word co-occurrence statistics. Using yearly word embeddings, the authors show that female stereotype values—the mean cosine distance of a domain's words to female versus male attribute words—rose in the Home, Work, and Politics domains after 1945. Work and Politics crossed from male-stereotyped to female-stereotyped territory around 1970, while Home remained the most female-stereotyped domain for the entire century. The paper also reports a statistically significant positive correlation between the female stereotype score of an occ

Load-bearing premise

The central measurement assumes that cosine-distance differences to female versus male gender words reflect semantic gender association, not shifts in how frequently those gender words occur—especially the changing frequency of the pronoun 彼(he), which correlates with the corpus-wide stereotype trend at r=0.60.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the measurements hold, postwar legal changes left a measurable trace in everyday Japanese prose: Work and Politics terms became more female-associated within roughly two decades, and the Home domain never lost its female association.
  • The persistent, even increasing, female stereotype in the Home domain suggests the cultural model was additive (homemaker plus worker/politician) rather than substitutive.
  • Because the corpus-wide average also rises, raw stereotype scores overstate domain-specific change; the adjusted score should be the default in future work on this corpus.
  • The occupation-census correlation indicates that when demographic data are sparse, embedding-based stereotype measures can serve as a proxy for women's actual presence in occupations.
  • The rise in the corpus-wide score beginning around 1966 implies that a global linguistic drift toward female association exists in Japanese, separate from any particular domain.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The abstract states that the Home domain 'remains stable over time, showing no statistically significant changes,' but the full text's Table 3 reports a significant positive trend for Home; readers should treat the abstract as an unreliable summary of the paper's own results.
  • If the frequency of the pronoun 彼(he) drove the corpus-wide trend, the post-1945 reversal in Work and Politics could partly reflect a literary-style shift (adoption then abandonment of Western-style third-person pronouns) rather than a change in gender beliefs; removing 彼 and 彼女 from attribute lists would test this.
  • The same adjusted-score approach could be applied to other digitized historical corpora (e.g., newspapers, political speeches) to see whether the 1945 inflection is specific to books or appears across registers.
  • The occupation-level census correlations are thin (at most nine data points per occupation); the stronger pooled correlation suggests future work should prioritize occupations with richer time series.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper trains year-specific SGNS word embeddings on the Japanese NDL n-gram corpus (1900–1999) and computes a WEAT-style female-stereotype score for three domains (Home, Work, Politics) and 18 occupations. It reports that all three domains show significant positive whole-century trends in female stereotype, that the Home domain remains the most female-stereotyped throughout, and that occupational stereotype values correlate moderately with census gender participation rates. The manuscript also reports a corpus-wide upward trend in the same stereotype measure and an adjusted analysis that removes this corpus average.

Significance. If the results are interpreted carefully, the study offers a useful longitudinal, non-Western benchmark for embedding-based stereotype measurement, and the public release of the trained yearly embeddings is a concrete asset. The occupation–census validation (overall r = 0.413, with significant correlations for doctors and dentists) is an important external check. However, the headline claim of a 1945-specific reversal with a stable Home domain is not supported by the statistics actually reported; the body's own findings are more modest and internally coherent. The significance of the paper therefore depends on substantial revision of the framing and additional analysis.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'In the Home domain, female stereotype values remain stable over time, showing no statistically significant changes.' This is directly contradicted by Section 5.1.1 and Table 3, which report a Home-domain trend coefficient of 0.000128 (SE 1.42e-5, p < 0.01). The full-text abstract itself says 'Home also became more female-stereotyped.' The central domain-specific contrast of the abstract is thus not supported by the paper's own results. This is not a wording issue: it reverses the main claimed finding.
  2. [§5.1.1, Table 3, Table 6] The paper claims 'significant trend reversals in female stereotype values around 1945, shifting from negative prewar trends to positive postwar trends' for Work and Politics. No statistical breakpoint test is provided. Tables 3 and 5 report only whole-century linear regressions; Figure 2 shows a visual inflection but the paper does not present a Chow test, segmented regression, or pre/post 1945 slope comparison. Moreover, the adjusted analysis in Table 6 shows that only Work has a significant (p < 0.05) negative relative trend; Politics does not. The reported evidence supports a gradual increase, not a statistically tested reversal at 1945.
  3. [Appendix A, §5.3] Appendix A documents r = 0.60 between the corpus-wide stereotype measure and the relative frequency gap between female and male gender words, and attributes the pattern largely to the rise and fall of 彼 (he). The authors concede this 'may have influenced female stereotype values calculated through the embedding models.' Because the same cosine-difference measure is applied to all target domains, this frequency-driven change in the attribute words' embeddings could affect the domain trends, including the post-1945 rise. Subtracting the corpus-wide average in §5.3 does not remove a non-uniform effect of the frequency gap across domains. The central semantic interpretation therefore remains at risk.
  4. [Appendix D] The embedding-quality checks show that yearly similarity and association scores correlate strongly with vocabulary size (r = 0.77 and 0.82). Since the paper compares stereotype values across years, systematic variation in model quality over time—especially around the periods of corpus-size collapse—could create or obscure trends. This is not mentioned in the Limitations section, and the paper does not test whether the main results are robust to year-specific model quality.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are many typos (e.g., 'centry', 'streotype', 'femle', 'vocaburarly', 'eacy year's word embeddding models'). A thorough proofread is needed.
  2. [§4.2] The sentence 'We used SGNS of its widespread adoption' should read 'We used SGNS because of its widespread adoption' or similar.
  3. [Figure captions] Figures 2, 6, and B3 repeat 'over the centry' and 'The red vertical line corresponds to 1945.' Also, Figures 5 and 6 claim confidence intervals are shown but 'not visible'; consider plotting them with a meaningful scale or omitting the shaded region.
  4. [§5.3.1] The heading 'Corpus-wide trend of increasing female stereotype?' is a question rather than a finding. Rephrase as a statement or a clearly labeled exploratory discussion.
  5. [§4.2 / Table 3 note] Table 6 uses a dagger (†) for 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05, but the note in the table says only '*' is used. The note should list both markers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured stereotype trajectories and the external census benchmark are not inserted as inputs to the derivation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained with respect to its inputs. Gender stereotype values are defined from fixed word lists and embedding geometry (Eq. 1); yearly embeddings are trained independently on the NDL n-gram corpus, with no target trajectory used in training. The trend coefficients in Tables 3-5 and the adjusted scores in Table 6 are descriptive summaries of those computed values, not parameters fitted to reproduce the conclusions. The occupation analysis is benchmarked externally against census female-participation rates, and the corpus-wide trend is explicitly compared with the domain trends rather than assumed. The only self-citation (ref [1], a general methods survey) is contextual and not load-bearing. The abstract's 'stable Home' claim conflicts with Table 3's significant positive Home coefficient and with Section 5.1.1's statement that all three domains rise after 1945; that is an internal-consistency/correctness problem, not an input-output circularity. Likewise, Appendix A's documented correlation (r=0.60) between the stereotype measure and gender-word frequency differences is an openly stated validity threat, not an instance of a predicted quantity being inserted as an input. No equation reduces to its own inputs, and no self-citation is used to force the conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No invented theoretical entities; the “female stereotype value” is a defined statistic over embeddings, not a postulated mechanism. The main burden is on the validity of embedding-based measurement and corpus representativeness, not on new physics or social-theory constructs.

free parameters (2)
  • Embedding hyperparameters (window size=4, negative sampling=10, vector dimension=300) = 4/10/300
    Chosen by hand/from prior work; not fitted to the outcome, but they shape every embedding and thus every stereotype value.
  • Bootstrap iterations = 1000
    Chosen by hand; affects confidence-interval precision, not point estimates.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption SGNS word embeddings trained on yearly NDL Ngram data capture distributional semantics valid for measuring associations
    Foundation of the whole measurement (§4.2); if yearly corpora are too small or non-representative, embeddings are not comparable.
  • domain assumption The WEAT cosine-difference score is a valid measure of cultural gender stereotype
    Adopted from Caliskan et al. (§4.3); validity is assumed from prior literature and not independently benchmarked here.
  • domain assumption J-LIWC2015 home/work categories and the Empath-based politics translation are valid for historical Japanese (1900–1999)
    Dictionaries were developed for modern Japanese; words were filtered for presence in all models but not validated historically (§4.4).
  • domain assumption The NDL Ngram corpus is representative of Japanese published discourse in each year and the copyright-expired subset does not introduce time-varying bias
    The corpus shrinks sharply after ~1970 due to copyright; earlier decades also reflect publication biases (§4.1, §7).
  • standard math OLS trend regressions on yearly time series yield valid standard errors (independent errors)
    Used for all trend coefficients (Tables 3–7); with 100 autocorrelated yearly observations, this assumption is likely violated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gendered Cultural Discourse in Japan across the Prewar-Postwar Transition: Evidence from Historical Word Embeddings." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QK52DVFB

@misc{pith2026251003905,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gendered Cultural Discourse in Japan across the Prewar-Postwar Transition: Evidence from Historical Word Embeddings},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QK52DVFB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.03905}
}
read the original abstract

We quantify the evolution of gender stereotypes in Japan from 1900 to 1998, covering the prewar-postwar transition, using a series of yearly word embeddings trained on historical text corpora. We define the gender stereotype value to measure the strength of a word's gender association by computing the difference in cosine similarity of the word to female- versus male-related attribute words. We examine trajectories of gender stereotype across three traditionally gendered domains: Home, Work, and Politics. To provide a more granular analysis and strengthen the robustness of our findings in the Work domain, we also examine changes in gender stereotypes across 18 occupations and calculate their correlations with gender participation statistics. Our results reveal domain-specific patterns. In the Home domain, female stereotype values remain stable over time, showing no statistically significant changes. In contrast, the Work and Politics domains exhibit significant trend reversals in female stereotype values around 1945, shifting from negative prewar trends to positive postwar trends, indicating increasing female associations in public domains over time. These findings show that trends in gendered cultural discourse shifted unevenly around 1945: the observed changes in the Work and Politics domains are temporally aligned with postwar institutional transformations, including reforms under the U.S.-led Allied Occupation, while the Home domain shows more limited change. Furthermore, female stereotype values for occupations show a moderately positive correlation (r=0.364) with the proportion of women in each occupation, indicating that word-embedding-based measures of gender stereotype mirrored demographic shifts to a meaningful extent.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    PeerJ Computer Science10, 2562 (2024)

    Matsui, A., Ferrara, E.: Word embedding for social sciences: An interdisciplinary survey. PeerJ Computer Science10, 2562 (2024)

    2024

  2. [2]

    Advances in neural information processing systems29(2016)

    Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J.Y., Saligrama, V., Kalai, A.T.: Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? debiasing word embeddings. Advances in neural information processing systems29(2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    Science356(6334), 183–186 (2017)

    Caliskan, A., Bryson, J.J., Narayanan, A.: Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science356(6334), 183–186 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115(16), 3635–3644 (2018)

    Garg, N., Schiebinger, L., Jurafsky, D., Zou, J.: Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences115(16), 3635–3644 (2018)

    2018

  5. [5]

    Sociological Science7, 1–35 (2020)

    Jones, J.J., Amin, M.R., Kim, J., Skiena, S.: Stereotypical gender associations in language have decreased over time. Sociological Science7, 1–35 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    American Sociological Review 84(5), 905–949 (2019)

    Kozlowski, A.C., Taddy, M., Evans, J.A.: The geometry of culture: Analyzing the meanings of class through word embeddings. American Sociological Review 84(5), 905–949 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119(28), 2121798119 (2022) 21

    Charlesworth, T.E., Caliskan, A., Banaji, M.R.: Historical representations of social groups across 200 years of word embeddings from google books. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119(28), 2121798119 (2022) 21

    2022

  8. [8]

    Cognition 164, 46–60 (2017)

    Bhatia, S.: The semantic representation of prejudice and stereotypes. Cognition 164, 46–60 (2017)

    2017

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    Nature human behaviour4(10), 1021–1028 (2020)

    Lewis, M., Lupyan, G.: Gender stereotypes are reflected in the distributional structure of 25 languages. Nature human behaviour4(10), 1021–1028 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    Psychological Science32(2), 218–240 (2021)

    Charlesworth, T.E., Yang, V., Mann, T.C., Kurdi, B., Banaji, M.R.: Gender stereotypes in natural language: Word embeddings show robust consistency across child and adult language corpora of more than 65 million words. Psychological Science32(2), 218–240 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology28(3), 280 (1933)

    Katz, D., Braly, K.: Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology28(3), 280 (1933)

    1933

  4. [12]

    The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology46(2), 245 (1951)

    Gilbert, G.M.: Stereotype persistence and change among college students. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology46(2), 245 (1951)

    1951

  5. [13]

    Journal of personality and social psychology74(6), 1464 (1998)

    Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., Schwartz, J.L.: Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of personality and social psychology74(6), 1464 (1998)

    1998

  6. [14]

    Journal of personality and social psychology102(6), 1214 (2012)

    Bergsieker, H.B., Leslie, L.M., Constantine, V.S., Fiske, S.T.: Stereotyping by omission: eliminate the negative, accentuate the positive. Journal of personality and social psychology102(6), 1214 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    Psychology of Women Quarterly45(1), 106–125 (2021)

    Bhatia, N., Bhatia, S.: Changes in gender stereotypes over time: A computational analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly45(1), 106–125 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Univ of California Press (1981)

    Pharr, S.J.: Political women in japan: The search for a place in political life. Univ of California Press (1981)

    1981

  9. [17]

    In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Asian History, (2018)

    Molony, B.: Feminism in japan. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Asian History, (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Unpublished, Uppsala University (2021)

    Okuyama, Y.: Empowering women through radio: Evidence from occupied japan. Unpublished, Uppsala University (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Osaka University Law Review69(1), 23–49 (2022)

    Berg, P.: Equality of men and women in article 24 of the japanese constitution (1947): The role of beate sirota (1923-2012) and beyond. Osaka University Law Review69(1), 23–49 (2022)

    1947

  12. [20]

    Princeton University Press (1998)

    Garon, S.: Molding japanese minds: The state in everyday life. Princeton University Press (1998)

    1998

  13. [21]

    Gender Inequalities in the Japanese Workplace and Employment: Theories and Empirical Evidence, 1–45 (2019) 22

    Yamaguchi, K.: Impediments to the advancement of women in the japanese employment system: Theoretical overview and the purpose of this book. Gender Inequalities in the Japanese Workplace and Employment: Theories and Empirical Evidence, 1–45 (2019) 22

    2019

  14. [22]

    Japan Labor Review13(3), 7–31 (2016)

    Yamaguchi, K.: Determinants of the gender gap in the proportion of managers among white-collar regular workers in japan. Japan Labor Review13(3), 7–31 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    In: Gender Inequalities in the Japanese Workplace and Employment: Theories and Empirical Evidence, pp

    Yamaguchi, K.: Causes and effects of gender occupational segregation: Overlooked obstacles to gender equality. In: Gender Inequalities in the Japanese Workplace and Employment: Theories and Empirical Evidence, pp. 83–110. Springer, ??? (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Routledge (2020)

    Eto, M.: Women and political inequality in japan: Gender imbalanced democracy. Routledge (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    http://mecab

    Kudo, T.: Mecab: Yet another part-of-speech and morphological analyzer. http://mecab. sourceforge. net/ (2005)

    2005

  18. [26]

    Journal of Natural Language Processing20(5), 727–748 (2013)

    Ogiso, T., Komachi, M., Matsumoto, Y.: Morphological analysis of historical japanese text. Journal of Natural Language Processing20(5), 727–748 (2013)

    2013

  19. [27]

    In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North Amer- ican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp

    Mikolov, T., Yih, W.-t., Zweig, G.: Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North Amer- ican Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 746–751 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp

    Hamilton, W.L., Leskovec, J., Jurafsky, D.: Diachronic word embeddings reveal statistical laws of semantic change. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 1489–1501 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp

    Zhao, Z., Liu, T., Li, S., Li, B., Du, X.: Ngram2vec: Learning improved word representations from ngram co-occurrence statistics. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 244–253 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Frontiers in psychology13, 841534 (2022)

    Igarashi, T., Okuda, S., Sasahara, K.: Development of the japanese version of the linguistic inquiry and word count dictionary 2015. Frontiers in psychology13, 841534 (2022)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Pennebaker, J.W., Boyd, R.L., Jordan, K., Blackburn, K.: The development and psychometric properties of liwc2015 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    Journal of language and social psychology 29(1), 24–54 (2010)

    Tausczik, Y.R., Pennebaker, J.W.: The psychological meaning of words: Liwc and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of language and social psychology 29(1), 24–54 (2010)

    2010

  25. [33]

    In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp

    Fast, E., Chen, B., Bernstein, M.S.: Empath: Understanding topic signals in large- scale text. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4647–4657 (2016) 23

    2016

  26. [34]

    In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp

    Ethayarajh, K., Duvenaud, D., Hirst, G.: Understanding undesirable word embed- ding associations. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1696–1705 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Antoniak, M., Mimno, D.: Bad seeds: Evaluating lexical methods for bias measurement. In: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), ...

    1904

  28. [36]

    American Ethnologist29(2), 392–422 (2002)

    Inoue, M.: Gender, language, and modernity: Toward an effective history of japanese women’s language. American Ethnologist29(2), 392–422 (2002)

    2002

  29. [37]

    Perspectives24(3), 417–430 (2016)

    Saito, M.: The power of translated literature in japan: The introduction of new expressions through translation in the meiji era (1868–1912). Perspectives24(3), 417–430 (2016)

    1912

  30. [38]

    John Benjamins Publishing Company344(2019)

    Ishiyama, O.: Diachrony of personal pronouns in japanese: A functional and cross- linguistic perspective. John Benjamins Publishing Company344(2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    Language Resources and Evaluation56(1), 109–137 (2022)

    Inohara, K., Utsumi, A.: Jwsan: Japanese word similarity and association norm. Language Resources and Evaluation56(1), 109–137 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(13), 5862–5871 (2019)

    Kurdi, B., Mann, T.C., Charlesworth, T.E., Banaji, M.R.: The relationship between implicit intergroup attitudes and beliefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(13), 5862–5871 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Personality and social psychology bulletin26(10), 1171–1188 (2000)

    Diekman, A.B., Eagly, A.H.: Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and social psychology bulletin26(10), 1171–1188 (2000)

    2000

  34. [42]

    Sex roles76, 556–565 (2017)

    Donnelly, K., Twenge, J.M.: Masculine and feminine traits on the bem sex- role inventory, 1993–2012: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Sex roles76, 556–565 (2017)

    1993

  35. [43]

    American psychologist75(3), 301 (2020)

    Eagly, A.H., Nater, C., Miller, D.I., Kaufmann, M., Sczesny, S.: Gender stereo- types have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of us public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American psychologist75(3), 301 (2020)

    1946

  36. [44]

    In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers), pp

    Zhao, J., Wang, T., Yatskar, M., Ordonez, V., Chang, K.-W.: Gender bias in coreference resolution: Evaluation and debiasing methods. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics: Human Language Technolo...

    2018

  37. [45]

    In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp

    Zhao, J., Zhou, Y., Li, Z., Wang, W., Chang, K.-W.: Learning gender-neutral word embeddings. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 4847–4853 (2018) 24

    2018

  38. [46]

    Studies in linguistic analysis, 10–32 (1957)

    Firth, J.: A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930-1955. Studies in linguistic analysis, 10–32 (1957)

    1930

  39. [47]

    Journal of personality and social psychology13(1), 1 (1969)

    Karlins, M., Coffman, T.L., Walters, G.: On the fading of social stereotypes: studies in three generations of college students. Journal of personality and social psychology13(1), 1 (1969)

    1969

  40. [48]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106(26), 10593– 10597 (2009)

    Nosek, B.A., Smyth, F.L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N.M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., Bar- Anan, Y., Bergh, R., Cai, H., Gonsalkorale, K.,et al.: National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the Nation...

    2009

  41. [49]

    Neural Computing and Applications 32, 6363–6381 (2020)

    Prates, M.O., Avelar, P.H., Lamb, L.C.: Assessing gender bias in machine trans- lation: a case study with google translate. Neural Computing and Applications 32, 6363–6381 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Black, J.S., Esch, P.: Ai-enabled recruiting: What is it and how should a manager use it? Business Horizons63(2), 215–226 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Personality and social psychology bulletin21(11), 1139–1150 (1995)

    Devine, P.G., Elliot, A.J.: Are racial stereotypes really fading? the princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and social psychology bulletin21(11), 1139–1150 (1995)

    1995

  44. [52]

    Personality and social psychology bulletin27(8), 996–1010 (2001)

    Madon, S., Guyll, M., Aboufadel, K., Montiel, E., Smith, A., Palumbo, P., Jussim, L.: Ethnic and national stereotypes: The princeton trilogy revisited and revised. Personality and social psychology bulletin27(8), 996–1010 (2001)

    2001

  45. [53]

    Educational and psychological measurement37(1), 101–110 (1977)

    Williams, J.E., Best, D.L.: Sex stereotypes and trait favorability on the adjective check list. Educational and psychological measurement37(1), 101–110 (1977)

    1977

  46. [54]

    Sage Publications, Inc (1990)

    Williams, J.E., Best, D.L.: Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study, rev. Sage Publications, Inc (1990)

    1990

  47. [55]

    American Sociological Review, 453–460 (1981)

    Cherlin, A., Walters, P.B.: Trends in united states men’s and women’s sex-role attitudes: 1972 to 1978. American Sociological Review, 453–460 (1981)

    1972

  48. [56]

    Psychological science17(1), 53–58 (2006)

    Baron, A.S., Banaji, M.R.: The development of implicit attitudes: Evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood. Psychological science17(1), 53–58 (2006)

    2006

  49. [57]

    Journal of applied psychology 90(3), 553 (2005)

    Ziegert, J.C., Hanges, P.J.: Employment discrimination: the role of implicit atti- tudes, motivation, and a climate for racial bias. Journal of applied psychology 90(3), 553 (2005)

    2005

  50. [58]

    Zeitschrift f¨ ur experimentelle 25 Psychologie48(2), 145–160 (2001)

    Banse, R., Seise, J., Zerbes, N.: Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reli- ability, validity, and controllability of the iat. Zeitschrift f¨ ur experimentelle 25 Psychologie48(2), 145–160 (2001)

    2001

  51. [59]

    Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30(5), 629–642 (2004)

    Jellison, W.A., McConnell, A.R., Gabriel, S.: Implicit and explicit measures of sexual orientation attitudes: In group preferences and related behaviors and beliefs among gay and straight men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30(5), 629–642 (2004)

    2004

  52. [60]

    Journal of experimental social psychology43(5), 825–832 (2007)

    Kiefer, A.K., Sekaquaptewa, D.: Implicit stereotypes and women’s math perfor- mance: How implicit gender-math stereotypes influence women’s susceptibility to stereotype threat. Journal of experimental social psychology43(5), 825–832 (2007)

    2007

  53. [61]

    Group Dynamics: Theory, research, and practice6(1), 101 (2002)

    Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R., Greenwald, A.G.: Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, research, and practice6(1), 101 (2002)

    2002

  54. [62]

    Psychological review109(1), 3 (2002)

    Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R., Rudman, L.A., Farnham, S.D., Nosek, B.A., Mellott, D.S.: A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological review109(1), 3 (2002)

    2002

  55. [63]

    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications10(1), 1–12 (2023)

    Chen, Z.: Ethics and discrimination in artificial intelligence-enabled recruitment practices. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications10(1), 1–12 (2023)

    2023

  56. [64]

    In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing, pp

    Font, J.E., Costa-juss` a, M.R.: Equalizing gender bias in neural machine transla- tion with word embeddings techniques. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing, pp. 147–154 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00965 (2020)

    Wang, T., Lin, X.V., Rajani, N.F., McCann, B., Ordonez, V., Xiong, C.: Double- hard debias: Tailoring word embeddings for gender bias mitigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00965 (2020)

    2005 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Stockholm University, Center for Pacific Asia Studies (1998)

    Iwanaga, K.: Women in japanese politics: A comparative perspective. Stockholm University, Center for Pacific Asia Studies (1998)

    1998

  59. [67]

    Oxford University Press (2021)

    Gordon, A.: A modern history of japan from tokugawa times to the present. Oxford University Press (2021)

    2021

  60. [68]

    University of Hawaii Press (2019)

    Ward, R.E., Sakamoto, Y.: Democratizing japan: the allied occupation. University of Hawaii Press (2019)

    2019

  61. [69]

    Oxford University Press (2004)

    Moore, R.A., Robinson, D.L.: Partners for democracy: Crafting the new japanese state under macarthur. Oxford University Press (2004)

    2004

  62. [70]

    science331(6014), 176–182 (2011)

    Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y.K., Aiden, A.P., Veres, A., Gray, M.K., Team, G.B., Pick- ett, J.P., Hoiberg, D., Clancy, D., Norvig, P.,et al.: Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. science331(6014), 176–182 (2011)

    2011

  63. [71]

    Davies, M.: The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 26 1990-present (2008)

    1990

  64. [72]

    Obana, Y.: The use of kare/kanojo in japanese society today. New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies5, 139–155 (2003) 27 /aj18/aj26/aj17/aj17/aj18/aj26/aj19/aj17/aj18/aj26/aj21/aj17/aj18/aj26/aj23/aj17/aj18/aj26/aj25/aj17/aj19/aj17/aj17/aj17 /aj58/aj70/aj66/aj83 /aj17/aj15/aj17/a...

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.