pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2510.05584 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-07 · ✦ hep-ph

NLP threshold corrections to W+jet production

Sourav Pal , Satyajit Seth This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 09:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords NLP correctionsthreshold correctionsW+jet productionnext-to-soft gluon radiationsoft quark emissionshelicity-dependent logarithmsuniversal structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Helicity-dependent next-to-leading power corrections in W+jet production match a proposed universal structure for any massive colourless final state produced with a jet.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper carries out an explicit calculation of the helicity-dependent next-to-leading power leading logarithms that appear in W boson plus jet production near threshold. These logarithms come from next-to-soft gluon radiation together with soft quark and antiquark emissions. The authors organise the contributions using helicity-sensitive spinor shifts and soft quark operators. The resulting expressions agree completely with a recently proposed universal form that is meant to cover every process in which a massive colourless particle appears together with a jet.

Core claim

The helicity-dependent NLP leading logarithms for W+jet production, obtained from next-to-soft gluon radiation and soft (anti-)quark emissions through helicity-sensitive spinor shifts and soft quark operators, match exactly the universal structure proposed for processes that produce an arbitrary massive colourless final state in association with a jet.

What carries the argument

Helicity-sensitive spinor shifts and soft quark operators that capture next-to-soft gluon radiation and soft quark emissions in the threshold limit.

If this is right

  • The same universal structure organises NLP corrections for any other process that produces a massive colourless particle with a jet.
  • Helicity dependence remains explicit in the universal expressions.
  • Threshold resummation at next-to-leading power can be performed without repeating the full calculation for each final state.
  • Soft emissions of both gluons and quarks are treated on the same footing across this class of processes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The agreement suggests that similar operator methods could organise corrections at even higher logarithmic orders or for processes with more jets.
  • Universal NLP forms may simplify the inclusion of these corrections in precision collider predictions for LHC observables.
  • The approach could be tested by applying the same operators to Z+jet or Higgs+jet production and checking numerical agreement.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen spinor shifts and soft quark operators capture every relevant next-to-soft and soft emission without omissions or the need for further process-specific adjustments.

What would settle it

An independent calculation of the soft-quark contribution to a specific helicity amplitude in a chosen kinematic region that deviates from the operator prediction would show that the claimed agreement with the universal structure does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.05584 by Satyajit Seth, Sourav Pal.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: , we present C¯ LL evaluated at several representative phase-space points as a function of the colourless heavy particle mass, scaled to the Higgs mass. The continuity between the H +jet and W +jet results under variation of the mass parameter clearly demonstrates the universality of the NLP logarithmic structure, as discussed in our previous work [93]. The NLP 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Panel (a) shows the C¯ LL result for radiation of a final state soft quark for Q = q, as given in eq. (27). Panel (a) displays the corresponding result for radiation of a final state soft anti-quark in the case Q = q ′ , as given in eq. (29). In both panels, the vertical red lines indicate the results for the W +jet process, while the vertical blue lines correspond to the results for H+jet production. 11 … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The C¯ LL coefficients arising from final state soft quark and anti-quark radiation are shown in panels (a) and (b), corresponding to eqs. (33) and (37) respectively. In both plots, the vertical red lines represent the results for the W +jet process, while the vertical blue lines denote the corresponding results for H +jet production. The result associated with eq. (35) is not displayed explicitly, as its … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: depicts the mass dependence of the normalized C¯ LL coefficients evaluated at represen￾0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4  m mH 2 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 C −+++ LL , 1q2 g 4 g(s)5¯q 0 + C − + − + LL , 1q2 g 4 g(s)5¯q 0 Radiation of soft gluon in qg initiated channel mW mH (a) 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4  m mH 2 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 C −+++ LL , 1q2 g 4 g 5¯q… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Panel (a) shows the C¯ LL result for next-to-soft gluon radiation, with both polarisation states summed, while panel (b) presents the C¯ LL for radiation of a soft final state anti-quark. In both panels, the vertical red lines indicate the results for the W +jet process, corresponding to eq. (45) (sum of both contributions) in panel (a), and eq. (47) in panel (b). The vertical blue line in panel (a) denote… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We perform a detailed computation of the helicity-dependent next-to-leading power leading logarithms in W+jet production, originating from next-to-soft gluon radiation and soft (anti-)quark emissions. These contributions are systematically captured via helicity-sensitive spinor shifts and soft quark operators. The resulting expressions exhibit full agreement with a recently proposed universal structure of NLP corrections for processes involving the production of an arbitrary massive colourless final state in association with a jet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper computes helicity-dependent next-to-leading power (NLP) leading logarithms in W+jet production from next-to-soft gluon radiation and soft (anti-)quark emissions. These are captured via helicity-sensitive spinor shifts and soft quark operators, with the resulting expressions shown to exhibit full agreement with a recently proposed universal structure of NLP corrections for massive colourless final state plus jet processes.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work adds concrete evidence supporting universality of NLP threshold corrections for jet-associated production of massive colourless bosons. This could streamline higher-order calculations for LHC processes involving W/Z/H + jet. The systematic use of established operators and explicit agreement with prior universal proposals are positive features of the analytic approach.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Operator construction and helicity shifts): the claim that helicity-sensitive spinor shifts plus soft quark operators capture every next-to-soft gluon and soft (anti)quark contribution at leading logarithm is load-bearing for the 'full agreement' result, yet the text does not enumerate all possible colour-flow interferences or electroweak coupling structures arising from the massive W boson to demonstrate that no additional operators are required.
  2. [§4] §4 (Comparison with universal structure): the reported agreement is presented as complete, but without an explicit cross-check (e.g., against a subset of diagrams or a known limiting case) that decay kinematics and W polarisation do not generate extra NLP terms outside the assumed basis, the universality conclusion rests on an unverified completeness assumption.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the spinor shifts could be collected in a short table for clarity, especially when comparing to the universal structure expressions.
  2. [§5] A brief statement on the kinematic cuts or collider energy used for any numerical illustrations would help readers assess the phenomenological relevance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Operator construction and helicity shifts): the claim that helicity-sensitive spinor shifts plus soft quark operators capture every next-to-soft gluon and soft (anti)quark contribution at leading logarithm is load-bearing for the 'full agreement' result, yet the text does not enumerate all possible colour-flow interferences or electroweak coupling structures arising from the massive W boson to demonstrate that no additional operators are required.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit enumeration of colour-flow interferences and electroweak coupling structures would make the completeness argument more transparent. In the revised manuscript we will add a short dedicated paragraph in §3 that systematically lists the relevant colour structures (including all possible attachments of the soft gluon or quark to the W-production and decay legs) and the electroweak vertices involving the massive W boson. We will then show that each of these is already accounted for by the helicity-sensitive spinor shifts and the soft-quark operators employed in the calculation, with no additional operators required at leading-logarithmic accuracy. This enumeration follows directly from the general operator basis used in our earlier work on the universal NLP structure. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Comparison with universal structure): the reported agreement is presented as complete, but without an explicit cross-check (e.g., against a subset of diagrams or a known limiting case) that decay kinematics and W polarisation do not generate extra NLP terms outside the assumed basis, the universality conclusion rests on an unverified completeness assumption.

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit cross-check would provide additional reassurance to the reader. In the revised version we will insert a brief new subsection (or short appendix) that performs such a verification. Concretely, we will (i) consider the limiting case in which the W boson is taken in a definite polarisation state and (ii) compare the NLP logarithms obtained from a reduced set of diagrams against the universal formula. This will explicitly confirm that decay kinematics and W polarisation do not produce extra NLP terms outside the assumed basis. The existing analytic agreement already indicates that no such terms appear, but the added cross-check will make this statement fully explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: computation of NLP corrections stands independently of the cited universal structure

full rationale

The paper performs an explicit computation of helicity-dependent NLP leading logarithms for W+jet production by applying helicity-sensitive spinor shifts and soft quark operators to next-to-soft gluon and soft (anti)quark emissions. The resulting expressions are then compared to an external universal structure proposed in prior literature. No quoted step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter, renames a known result, or relies on a self-citation chain whose validity is presupposed by the present work. The agreement functions as an external consistency check rather than a definitional tautology, leaving the derivation self-contained against the stated operator basis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The computation rests on standard assumptions of perturbative QCD threshold resummation and soft-collinear factorization. No new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract; the work applies existing operator techniques to a new process.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Soft-collinear effective theory or equivalent factorization theorems hold for next-to-soft gluon and soft quark emissions at NLP.
    Invoked to justify the use of spinor shifts and soft quark operators for capturing the leading logarithms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5585 in / 1306 out tokens · 28686 ms · 2026-05-18T09:51:02.480532+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We perform a detailed computation of the helicity-dependent next-to-leading power leading logarithms in W+jet production, originating from next-to-soft gluon radiation and soft (anti-)quark emissions. These contributions are systematically captured via helicity-sensitive spinor shifts and soft quark operators.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The resulting expressions exhibit full agreement with a recently proposed universal structure of NLP corrections for processes involving the production of an arbitrary massive colourless final state in association with a jet.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 101 canonical work pages · 47 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Parisi,Summing large perturbative corrections in QCD,Phys

    G. Parisi,Summing large perturbative corrections in QCD,Phys. Lett.B90(1980) 295

    work page 1980

  2. [2]

    Curci and M

    G. Curci and M. Greco,Large Infrared Corrections in QCD Processes,Phys. Lett.B92 (1980) 175

    work page 1980

  3. [3]

    Sterman,Summation of large corrections to short distance hadronic cross-sections, Nucl

    G. Sterman,Summation of large corrections to short distance hadronic cross-sections, Nucl. Phys.B281(1987) 310. 18

    work page 1987

  4. [4]

    Catani and L

    S. Catani and L. Trentadue,Resummation of the QCD Perturbative Series for Hard Processes,Nucl. Phys.B327(1989) 323

    work page 1989

  5. [5]

    Catani and L

    S. Catani and L. Trentadue,Comment on qcd exponentiation at large x,Nucl. Phys. B353(1991) 183

    work page 1991

  6. [6]

    J. G. M. Gatheral,Exponentiation of eikonal cross-sections in nonabelian gauge theories, Phys. Lett.B133(1983) 90

    work page 1983

  7. [7]

    Frenkel and J

    J. Frenkel and J. C. Taylor,Nonabelian eikonal exponentiation,Nucl. Phys.B246 (1984) 231

    work page 1984

  8. [8]

    Sterman,Infrared divergences in perturbative QCD,

    G. Sterman,Infrared divergences in perturbative QCD,

    work page

  9. [9]

    G. P. Korchemsky and G. Marchesini,Structure function for large x and renormalization of wilson loop,Nucl. Phys.B406(1993) 225 [hep-ph/9210281]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  10. [10]

    G. P. Korchemsky and G. Marchesini,Resummation of large infrared corrections using Wilson loops,Phys. Lett.B313(1993) 433

    work page 1993

  11. [11]

    Threshold Resummation in Momentum Space from Effective Field Theory

    T. Becher and M. Neubert,Threshold resummation in momentum space from effective field theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 082001 [hep-ph/0605050]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  12. [12]

    M. D. Schwartz,Resummation and NLO matching of event shapes with effective field theory,Phys.Rev.D77(2008) 014026 [0709.2709]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  13. [13]

    C. W. Bauer, S. P. Fleming, C. Lee and G. F. Sterman,Factorization of e+e- Event Shape Distributions with Hadronic Final States in Soft Collinear Effective Theory, Phys.Rev.D78(2008) 034027 [0801.4569]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  14. [14]

    J.-y. Chiu, A. Fuhrer, R. Kelley and A. V. Manohar,Factorization Structure of Gauge Theory Amplitudes and Application to Hard Scattering Processes at the LHC,Phys.Rev. D80(2009) 094013 [0909.0012]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  15. [15]

    QCD resummation for hadronic final states

    G. Luisoni and S. Marzani,QCD resummation for hadronic final states,J. Phys.G42 (2015) 103101 [1505.04084]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    Becher, A

    T. Becher, A. Broggio and A. Ferroglia,Introduction to Soft-Collinear Effective Theory, Lect. Notes Phys.896(2015) pp.1 [1410.1892]

    work page arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Campbell, J

    J. Campbell, J. Huston and F. Krauss,The Black Book of Quantum Chromodynamics. Oxford University Press, 2017

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Soft Gluon Radiation in Higgs Boson Production at the LHC

    M. Kramer, E. Laenen and M. Spira,Soft gluon radiation in Higgs boson production at the LHC,Nucl. Phys.B511(1998) 523 [hep-ph/9611272]. 19

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  19. [19]

    R. D. Ball, M. Bonvini, S. Forte, S. Marzani and G. Ridolfi,Higgs production in gluon fusion beyond NNLO,Nucl.Phys.B874(2013) 746 [1303.3590]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  20. [20]

    Resummation prescriptions and ambiguities in SCET vs. direct QCD: Higgs production as a case study

    M. Bonvini, S. Forte, G. Ridolfi and L. Rottoli,Resummation prescriptions and ambiguities in SCET vs. direct QCD: Higgs production as a case study,JHEP01(2015) 046 [1409.0864]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    Higgs boson gluon-fusion production in N3LO QCD

    C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, F. Herzog and B. Mistlberger,Higgs Boson Gluon-Fusion Production in QCD at Three Loops,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 212001 [1503.06056]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  22. [22]

    High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC

    C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, E. Furlan, T. Gehrmann, F. Herzog et al.,High precision determination of the gluon fusion Higgs boson cross-section at the LHC,JHEP 05(2016) 058 [1602.00695]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    van Beekveld, W

    M. van Beekveld, W. Beenakker, R. Basu, E. Laenen, A. Misra and P. Motylinski, Next-to-leading power threshold effects for resummed prompt photon production,Phys. Rev.D100(2019) 056009 [1905.11771]

    work page arXiv 2019

  24. [24]

    van Beekveld, E

    M. van Beekveld, E. Laenen, J. Sinninghe Damst´ e and L. Vernazza,Next-to-leading power threshold corrections for finite order and resummed colour-singlet cross sections, JHEP05(2021) 114 [2101.07270]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    A. H. Ajjath, P. Mukherjee, V. Ravindran, A. Sankar and S. Tiwari,Next-to SV resummed Drell-Yan cross section beyond leading-logarithm,2107.09717

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    On threshold resummation beyond leading 1-x order

    G. Grunberg and V. Ravindran,On threshold resummation beyond leading 1-x order, JHEP10(2009) 055 [0902.2702]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  27. [27]

    G. Soar, S. Moch, J. Vermaseren and A. Vogt,On Higgs-exchange DIS, physical evolution kernels and fourth-order splitting functions at large x,Nucl.Phys.B832(2010) 152 [0912.0369]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  28. [28]

    On non-singlet physical evolution kernels and large-x coefficient functions in perturbative QCD

    S. Moch and A. Vogt,On non-singlet physical evolution kernels and large-x coefficient functions in perturbative QCD,JHEP11(2009) 099 [0909.2124]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  29. [29]

    Threshold Resummation of the Structure Function F_L

    S. Moch and A. Vogt,Threshold Resummation of the Structure Function F(L),JHEP 04(2009) 081 [0902.2342]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  30. [30]

    Next-to-eikonal corrections to soft gluon radiation: a diagrammatic approach

    E. Laenen, L. Magnea, G. Stavenga and C. D. White,Next-to-eikonal corrections to soft gluon radiation: a diagrammatic approach,JHEP1101(2011) 141 [1010.1860]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  31. [31]

    Path integral approach to eikonal and next-to-eikonal exponentiation

    E. Laenen, G. Stavenga and C. D. White,Path integral approach to eikonal and next-to-eikonal exponentiation,JHEP03(2009) 054 [0811.2067]. 20

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  32. [32]

    Approximate N^3LO Higgs-boson production cross section using physical-kernel constraints

    D. de Florian, J. Mazzitelli, S. Moch and A. Vogt,Approximate N 3LO Higgs-boson production cross section using physical-kernel constraints,JHEP10(2014) 176 [1408.6277]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  33. [33]

    Leading large-x logarithms of the quark-gluon contributions to inclusive Higgs-boson and lepton-pair production

    N. Lo Presti, A. Almasy and A. Vogt,Leading large-x logarithms of the quark & gluon contributions to inclusive Higgs-boson and lepton-pair production,Phys. Lett.B737 (2014) 120 [1407.1553]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    A factorization approach to next-to-leading-power threshold logarithms

    D. Bonocore, E. Laenen, L. Magnea, S. Melville, L. Vernazza and C. D. White,A factorization approach to next-to-leading-power threshold logarithms,JHEP06(2015) 008 [1503.05156]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [35]

    Non-abelian factorisation for next-to-leading-power threshold logarithms

    D. Bonocore, E. Laenen, L. Magnea, L. Vernazza and C. D. White,Non-abelian factorisation for next-to-leading-power threshold logarithms,JHEP12(2016) 121 [1610.06842]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [36]

    Bonocore,Asymptotic dynamics on the worldline for spinning particles,JHEP02 (2021) 007 [2009.07863]

    D. Bonocore,Asymptotic dynamics on the worldline for spinning particles,JHEP02 (2021) 007 [2009.07863]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Soft Photon Theorem for High Energy Amplitudes in Yukawa and Scalar Theories

    H. Gervais,Soft Photon Theorem for High Energy Amplitudes in Yukawa and Scalar Theories,Phys. Rev.D95(2017) 125009 [1704.00806]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Soft Graviton Emission at High and Low Energies in Yukawa and Scalar Theories

    H. Gervais,Soft Graviton Emission at High and Low Energies in Yukawa and Scalar Theories,Phys. Rev.D96(2017) 065007 [1706.03453]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  39. [39]

    Gervais,Soft Radiation Theorems at All Loop Order in Quantum Field Theory, Ph.D

    H. Gervais,Soft Radiation Theorems at All Loop Order in Quantum Field Theory, Ph.D. thesis, SUNY, Stony Brook, 2017-08-04

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Laenen, J

    E. Laenen, J. Sinninghe Damst´ e, L. Vernazza, W. Waalewijn and L. Zoppi,Towards all-order factorization of QED amplitudes at next-to-leading power,Phys. Rev.D103 (2021) 034022 [2008.01736]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Universality of next-to-leading power threshold effects for colourless final states in hadronic collisions

    V. Del Duca, E. Laenen, L. Magnea, L. Vernazza and C. D. White,Universality of next-to-leading power threshold effects for colourless final states in hadronic collisions, JHEP11(2017) 057 [1706.04018]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    van Beekveld, W

    M. van Beekveld, W. Beenakker, E. Laenen and C. D. White,Next-to-leading power threshold effects for inclusive and exclusive processes with final state jets,JHEP03 (2020) 106 [1905.08741]

    work page arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    The method of regions and next-to-soft corrections in Drell-Yan production

    D. Bonocore, E. Laenen, L. Magnea, L. Vernazza and C. D. White,The method of regions and next-to-soft corrections in Drell-Yan production,Phys. Lett.B742(2015) 375 [1410.6406]. 21

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    On next-to-leading power threshold corrections in Drell-Yan production at N$^3$LO

    N. Bahjat-Abbas, J. Sinninghe Damst´ e, L. Vernazza and C. D. White,On next-to-leading power threshold corrections in Drell-Yan production at N 3LO,JHEP10 (2018) 144 [1807.09246]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    M. A. Ebert, I. Moult, I. W. Stewart, F. J. Tackmann, G. Vita and H. X. Zhu,Power Corrections for N-Jettiness Subtractions atO(αs),JHEP12(2018) 084 [1807.10764]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    Next-to-leading-logarithmic power corrections for $N$-jettiness subtraction in color-singlet production

    R. Boughezal, A. Isgr` o and F. Petriello,Next-to-leading-logarithmic power corrections forN-jettiness subtraction in color-singlet production,Phys. Rev.D97(2018) 076006 [1802.00456]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    Boughezal, A

    R. Boughezal, A. Isgr` o and F. Petriello,Next-to-leading power corrections toV+ 1jet production inN-jettiness subtraction,Phys. Rev.D101(2020) 016005 [1907.12213]

    work page arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Bahjat-Abbas, D

    N. Bahjat-Abbas, D. Bonocore, J. Sinninghe Damst´ e, E. Laenen, L. Magnea, L. Vernazza et al.,Diagrammatic resummation of leading-logarithmic threshold effects at next-to-leading power,JHEP11(2019) 002 [1905.13710]

    work page arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    A. H. Ajjath, P. Mukherjee and V. Ravindran,On next to soft corrections to Drell-Yan and Higgs Boson productions,2006.06726

    work page arXiv 2006

  50. [50]

    A. H. Ajjath, P. Mukherjee, V. Ravindran, A. Sankar and S. Tiwari,On next to soft threshold corrections to DIS and SIA processes,JHEP04(2021) 131 [2007.12214]

    work page arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    A. H. Ajjath, P. Mukherjee, V. Ravindran, A. Sankar and S. Tiwari,On next to soft corrections for Drell-Yan and Higgs boson rapidity distributions beyond N 3LO,Phys. Rev.D103(2021) L111502 [2010.00079]

    work page arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Ahmed, A

    T. Ahmed, A. A. H., P. Mukherjee, V. Ravindran and A. Sankar,Soft-virtual correction and threshold resummation forn-colorless particles to fourth order in QCD: Part II, 2010.02980

    work page arXiv 2010

  53. [53]

    Ahmed, A

    T. Ahmed, A. H. Ajjath, G. Das, P. Mukherjee, V. Ravindran and S. Tiwari,Soft-virtual correction and threshold resummation forn-colorless particles to fourth order in QCD: Part I,2010.02979

    work page arXiv 2010

  54. [54]

    D. W. Kolodrubetz, I. Moult and I. W. Stewart,Building Blocks for Subleading Helicity Operators,JHEP05(2016) 139 [1601.02607]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  55. [55]

    Subleading Power Corrections for N-Jettiness Subtractions

    I. Moult, L. Rothen, I. W. Stewart, F. J. Tackmann and H. X. Zhu,Subleading Power Corrections for N-Jettiness Subtractions,Phys. Rev.D95(2017) 074023 [1612.00450]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  56. [56]

    A Complete Basis of Helicity Operators for Subleading Factorization

    I. Feige, D. W. Kolodrubetz, I. Moult and I. W. Stewart,A Complete Basis of Helicity Operators for Subleading Factorization,JHEP11(2017) 142 [1703.03411]. 22

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Anomalous dimension of subleading-power N-jet operators

    M. Beneke, M. Garny, R. Szafron and J. Wang,Anomalous dimension of subleading-power N-jet operators,JHEP03(2018) 001 [1712.04416]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Anomalous dimension of subleading-power ${N}$-jet operators II

    M. Beneke, M. Garny, R. Szafron and J. Wang,Anomalous dimension of subleading-powerN-jet operators. Part II,JHEP11(2018) 112 [1808.04742]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  59. [59]

    Helicity Methods for High Multiplicity Subleading Soft and Collinear Limits

    A. Bhattacharya, I. Moult, I. W. Stewart and G. Vita,Helicity Methods for High Multiplicity Subleading Soft and Collinear Limits,JHEP05(2019) 192 [1812.06950]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Beneke, M

    M. Beneke, M. Garny, R. Szafron and J. Wang,Violation of the Kluberg-Stern-Zuber theorem in SCET,JHEP09(2019) 101 [1907.05463]

    work page arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    G. T. Bodwin, J.-H. Ee, J. Lee and X.-P. Wang,Renormalization of the radiative jet function,2107.07941

    work page arXiv

  62. [62]

    Moult, I

    I. Moult, I. W. Stewart and G. Vita,Subleading Power Factorization with Radiative Functions,JHEP11(2019) 153 [1905.07411]

    work page arXiv 2019

  63. [63]

    Beneke, A

    M. Beneke, A. Broggio, S. Jaskiewicz and L. Vernazza,Threshold factorization of the Drell-Yan process at next-to-leading power,JHEP07(2020) 078 [1912.01585]

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    Z. L. Liu and M. Neubert,Factorization at subleading power and endpoint-divergent convolutions inh→γγdecay,JHEP04(2020) 033 [1912.08818]

    work page arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Z. L. Liu, B. Mecaj, M. Neubert and X. Wang,Factorization at subleading power, Sudakov resummation, and endpoint divergences in soft-collinear effective theory,Phys. Rev.D104(2021) 014004 [2009.04456]

    work page arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    Power Corrections in the N-jettiness Subtraction Scheme

    R. Boughezal, X. Liu and F. Petriello,Power Corrections in the N-jettiness Subtraction Scheme,JHEP03(2017) 160 [1612.02911]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  67. [67]

    A Subleading Operator Basis and Matching for $gg \to H$

    I. Moult, I. W. Stewart and G. Vita,A subleading operator basis and matching for gg→ H,JHEP07(2017) 067 [1703.03408]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  68. [68]

    A Subleading Power Operator Basis for the Scalar Quark Current

    C.-H. Chang, I. W. Stewart and G. Vita,A Subleading Power Operator Basis for the Scalar Quark Current,JHEP04(2018) 041 [1712.04343]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    First Subleading Power Resummation for Event Shapes

    I. Moult, I. W. Stewart, G. Vita and H. X. Zhu,First Subleading Power Resummation for Event Shapes,JHEP08(2018) 013 [1804.04665]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  70. [70]

    Leading-logarithmic threshold resummation of the Drell-Yan process at next-to-leading power

    M. Beneke, A. Broggio, M. Garny, S. Jaskiewicz, R. Szafron, L. Vernazza et al., Leading-logarithmic threshold resummation of the Drell-Yan process at next-to-leading power,JHEP03(2019) 043 [1809.10631]. 23

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  71. [71]

    M. A. Ebert, I. Moult, I. W. Stewart, F. J. Tackmann, G. Vita and H. X. Zhu, Subleading power rapidity divergences and power corrections for qT ,JHEP04(2019) 123 [1812.08189]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  72. [72]

    Beneke, M

    M. Beneke, M. Garny, S. Jaskiewicz, R. Szafron, L. Vernazza and J. Wang, Leading-logarithmic threshold resummation of Higgs production in gluon fusion at next-to-leading power,JHEP01(2020) 094 [1910.12685]

    work page arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    Moult, I

    I. Moult, I. W. Stewart, G. Vita and H. X. Zhu,The Soft Quark Sudakov,JHEP05 (2020) 089 [1910.14038]

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Z. L. Liu and M. Neubert,Two-Loop Radiative Jet Function for ExclusiveB-Meson and Higgs Decays,JHEP06(2020) 060 [2003.03393]

    work page arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Z. L. Liu, B. Mecaj, M. Neubert, X. Wang and S. Fleming,Renormalization and Scale Evolution of the Soft-Quark Soft Function,JHEP07(2020) 104 [2005.03013]

    work page arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    Wang,Resummation of double logarithms in loop-induced processes with effective field theory,1912.09920

    J. Wang,Resummation of double logarithms in loop-induced processes with effective field theory,1912.09920

    work page arXiv 1912

  77. [77]

    Beneke, M

    M. Beneke, M. Garny, S. Jaskiewicz, R. Szafron, L. Vernazza and J. Wang,Large-x resummation of off-diagonal deep-inelastic parton scattering from d-dimensional refactorization,JHEP10(2020) 196 [2008.04943]

    work page arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    van Beekveld, L

    M. van Beekveld, L. Vernazza and C. D. White,Threshold resummation of new partonic channels at next-to-leading power,JHEP12(2021) 087 [2109.09752]

    work page arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    Das and A

    G. Das and A. Sankar,Next-to-soft threshold effects on Higgs boson production via bottom quark annihilation,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 076008 [2409.01553]

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    G. Das, C. Dey, M. C. Kumar and K. Samanta,Soft gluon resummation for gluon fusion ZHproduction,2501.10330

    work page arXiv

Showing first 80 references.