Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Resolving Star Cluster Formation in Galaxy Simulations with Cosmic Ray Feedback

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Cosmic rays reduce star formation rates, steepen the young cluster mass function, and make newborn star clusters more tightly bound in high-resolution galaxy-disk simulations.

desk verdict First ensemble of star clusters from simulations with self-confined CR transport, but the abstract's CFE claim is contradicted by their own Table 1 and needs a threshold-independent test. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.06134 v2 pith:I6ZC7HOK submitted 2025-10-07 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE

Brandon Sike , Mateusz Ruszkowski , Oleg Y. Gnedin , Yingtian Chen , Matthias Weber , Timon Thomas , Christoph Pfrommer This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords cosmicraysstarclustersmagnetohydrodynamicalsimulationsinterstellarmediumstellarfeedbackclustermassfunctionformationefficiencyion-neutraldamping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that cosmic rays are not a minor side effect in star cluster formation but an agent that reshapes the entire cluster population: in a set of high-resolution patch-disk simulations of a solar-neighborhood-like interstellar medium, adding dynamically coupled cosmic rays lowers the star formation rate, steepens the power-law slope of the young cluster mass function (from about -2.1 to -2.3/-2.4), and lowers the cluster formation efficiency. Every simulated case nevertheless remains consistent with observed young cluster populations, and cosmic rays move results along observed environmental trends rather than outside them. The paper explains all of these changes through one causal chain: cosmic-ray pressure reduces the star formation rate, fewer supernovae mean less turbulent kinetic energy in the gas, molecular clouds and the clusters born from them inherit lower velocity dispersions, and clusters therefore come out more bound under self-gravity, with average virial parameters below 1 rather than above. The effective clustering of supernovae is unchanged by cosmic rays. A sympathetic reader would care because this gives a concrete, falsifiable mechanism connecting cosmic-ray transport physics to the demographics of star clusters.

What carries the argument

The physical engine is cosmic-ray transport under the theory of self-confinement, in which cosmic rays scatter off self-excited Alfvén waves (magnetic oscillations); with ion-neutral damping, cosmic rays decouple from cold neutral gas, weakening but not eliminating their dynamical effect. The diagnostic that carries the argument is the star cluster census: a friends-of-friends algorithm with a fourth time coordinate groups coeval star particles into clusters, from which the mass function slope, the cluster formation efficiency (bound cluster mass per unit total stellar mass formed), and the virial parameter (whether a cluster is bound, below 1, or unbound, above 1) are measured. The key comp

What would settle it

Re-run the same disk patch with a star-formation efficiency of a few percent per free-fall time, or with pre-supernova radiative feedback included, and compare the magnetohydrodynamic run with the cosmic-ray run that includes ion-neutral damping; if the ordering of cluster virial parameters, mass-function slopes, or formation efficiencies between the cases disappears or inverts, the claim that cosmic rays act primarily by lowering the star formation rate is an artifact of the prescription. A purely observational check: if young clusters in galaxies with higher cosmic-ray energy densities do no

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Central discovery: in simulations that form many star clusters with dynamically coupled cosmic rays, cosmic rays act primarily by throttling star formation, not by changing cloud collapse or supernova clustering. Compared with a magnetohydrodynamic run, two self-confinement cosmic-ray runs (uniform coupling, and with ion-neutral damping) show lower star formation rates, steeper cluster mass functions, and lower cluster formation efficiencies. Gas and stars in the cosmic-ray runs have lower velocity dispersions, and young clusters have similar radii and age spreads but much lower virial parameters: bound on average, versus unbound without cosmic rays. The route is indirect: fewer supernovae,

Load-bearing premise

The comparison assumes the relative differences between the cosmic-ray and no-cosmic-ray runs are robust to the simplified star-formation recipe — a gas density threshold of 1,000 particles per cubic centimeter, 100% of gas turning into stars each free-fall time, and no early radiation or stellar winds — even though the paper does not vary these parameters.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With cosmic rays, young star clusters in the simulations are bound on average, whereas without them clusters are unbound on average, so a cosmic-ray-regulated interstellar medium should produce clusters that are more likely to survive as open clusters.
  • The cluster mass function steepens from about -2.1 without cosmic rays to -2.3 to -2.4 with them, yet stays inside the observational scatter for solar-neighborhood environments, so cosmic-ray transport does not need fine-tuning to match observed cluster demographics.
  • Because about half of supernovae explode in diffuse gas in all three cases, the efficiency with which clustered supernovae deliver energy to the interstellar medium does not depend on the cosmic-ray transport model, only on the total supernova rate.
  • The simulated cluster formation efficiency correlates positively with star-formation-rate surface density, consistent with observations, although the paper notes that the correlation above a 5000-solar-mass threshold may be partly driven by how the threshold cuts into a varying mass function.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the causal chain is right, then environments with strong cosmic-ray pressure, such as galactic centers or starbursts, should produce young clusters with unusually low virial parameters that survive tidal disruption longer; resolved cluster surveys could test this.
  • The finding that cloud velocity dispersion scales with mass to roughly the 0.3 power in every case, with only the normalization differing, suggests cosmic rays set the global turbulent energy budget rather than locally altering cloud collapse; comparing the normalization of the cloud velocity dispersion-mass relation across galaxies with differing cosmic-ray energy densities would test this direct
  • Because the positive cluster-formation-efficiency trend may be an artifact of the 5000-solar-mass threshold, the physically meaningful quantity may be a roughly constant bound-cluster formation efficiency above 1000 solar masses; redoing the analysis with a completeness correction down to 100 solar masses would separate the artifact from a real environmental trend.
  • If pre-supernova radiative feedback were added, cluster formation epochs would likely shorten and absolute formation efficiencies drop, but if the paper's independence argument holds, the relative ordering of the three physics cases should persist; running a single cosmic-ray case with radiation would check this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes three existing 'tallbox' galaxy simulations from S25 (MHD, CR-NL, and CR-NL-IN) that include dynamically coupled cosmic rays, a multiphase ISM, and near-individual star particles. It identifies star clusters with a 4D friends-of-friends algorithm, fits their mass functions, measures cluster formation efficiencies (CFEs) with two lower-mass thresholds, and characterizes cluster radii, age spreads, velocity dispersions, and virial parameters. It also studies the clustering of supernovae by their ambient gas density. The central claim is that cosmic rays simultaneously reduce the star formation rate, steepen the power-law slope of the cluster mass function, and reduce the CFE, while making clusters more gravitationally bound by lowering the turbulent energy budget of the ISM. The paper compares these results with observed cluster scaling relations and reports broad consistency.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this would be an important step: it is, to my knowledge, the first study to analyze an ensemble of resolved star clusters in simulations with dynamically coupled cosmic rays under the self-confinement framework, using star particles of ~10 Msun. The analysis is careful in several respects: mass-function slopes are fitted with a Poisson likelihood and bootstrapped errors; the CFE calculation uses an iterative bound-cluster criterion consistent with the softening kernel; and the observational comparison is extensive. The result that CRs reduce the SFR and steepen the cluster mass function is well supported by the presented data. However, the claim that CRs reduce the CFE is internally inconsistent with the paper's own Table 1, and the narrative in Section 7 points in the opposite direction. Because this is one of the three headline claims in the abstract, the paper needs substantial revision before the central message can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 4.3.2 / Table 1] The abstract states that CRs 'reduce the cluster formation efficiency,' but this is not supported by the paper's own Γ1000 values: Table 1 gives Γ1000 = 30.9% for MHD, 57.5% for CR-NL, and 51.9% for CR-NL-IN. Only the 5000 Msun threshold yields the claimed ordering (14.0% vs 11.1% and 13.1%). Section 4.3.2 itself argues that the positive Γ5000–Σ_SFR relation 'could be purely artificial' because a steeper mass function leaves less mass above a fixed threshold. Since CRs steepen the mass function, the lower Γ5000 follows mechanically from the slope change. The physical narrative in Section 7 (less turbulent ISM -> more bound clusters) predicts the opposite trend. This is an internal inconsistency, not merely a missing parameter sweep; the CFE claim must either be removed or supported by a threshold-independent definition (e.g., a mass-dependent bound fraction or a completeness-corrected CF
  2. [Sec. 2.3 and Appendix A] The robustness of the relative CR effects to the adopted star-formation and feedback prescription is asserted but not tested. Section 2.3 states that 'the relative differences between our three cases are likely robust to the inclusion of radiative feedback,' and Appendix A gives qualitative arguments about the high density threshold and 100% efficiency. These parameters are known to affect the cluster mass function and CFE (e.g., Li et al. 2018; Hu et al. 2023). The paper does not vary the star formation efficiency, density threshold, or include pre-SN feedback. Since the CFE trends are already threshold-dependent within the current analysis, the robustness claim is load-bearing. A test with at least one alternative efficiency or feedback variant—or a clearly stated restriction of the claims to the adopted model—is needed.
  3. [Sec. 7] The interpretive narrative in Section 7 is in tension with the abstract's CFE claim. The paper argues that CRs reduce the SFR, which lowers the turbulent energy budget, which lowers cloud and cluster velocity dispersions, and therefore makes clusters 'more bound under self-gravity' (abstract). If clusters are more bound, a larger fraction of formed stellar mass should remain in bound clusters—i.e., a higher CFE—at fixed mass threshold. The paper's own Γ1000 values show this. The physical story thus supports the opposite of the claimed CFE reduction. This needs to be reconciled explicitly, either by changing the abstract or by providing a mechanism that explains why a lower velocity dispersion does not increase the bound fraction.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.1 / throughout] The name of the feedback model is inconsistently typeset: 'Crisp' in the text, 'CRISP' in the abstract and keywords. Please unify.
  2. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (1)] The definition of the time-to-space conversion factor u0 is clear, but the text says 'a difference in age of 2 Myr is equivalent to a spatial separation of 1 pc.' The preceding sentence says u0 = 1 pc/2 Myr, so this is internally consistent, but the direction of the equivalence may confuse readers; consider rephrasing.
  3. [Appendix D, Table 1] The header 'N>10^3 M⊙' is ambiguous; it counts clusters above 10^3 Msun, but the expression could be read as a mass threshold. Spell out 'number of clusters above 1000 Msun'.
  4. [Fig. 5] The figures use a symbol '3' for velocity dispersion (e.g., 'where 3 is evaluated in the lab frame' in Sec. 7 and in the Fig. 5 caption). This appears to be a rendering artifact of the LaTeX control sequence for sigma; please ensure all velocity-dispersion symbols are typeset correctly.
  5. [Sec. 4.3.2] The CFE calculation is described as a four-step process, but only three steps are enumerated (assign to SFRD bin, compute bound mass, apply mass cut, divide by total stellar mass). The final division is described in prose but not numbered; consider aligning the enumeration with the steps.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: cluster properties are emergent simulation outputs; the CFE threshold caveat is a robustness issue, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. It re-analyzes the simulations presented in S25 (B. Sike et al. 2025), but the star-cluster catalog, mass functions, power-law slopes, radii, velocity dispersions, and virial parameters are newly extracted diagnostics that were not inputs to the CR transport model or star-formation prescription. The CR transport implementation is adopted from previous work (Thomas & Pfrommer 2019, 2022; Thomas et al. 2021, 2023) and the CRISP thermochemistry model is cited as in prep / Thomas et al. 2025; these are stated modeling assumptions rather than results that presuppose the present conclusions. The abstract's claim that CRs 'reduce the cluster formation efficiency' is threshold-dependent: Table 1 shows Γ1000 = 30.9% (MHD) vs 57.5% (CR-NL) and 51.9% (CR-NL-IN), while only the Γ5000 values support the abstract statement. The paper itself flags this in Section 4.3.2: 'It is possible that the positive correlation between Γ (using the threshold of 5000 M⊙), and the SFRD is purely artificial... More detailed analysis would be required to verify whether our Γ−Σ SFR relation is physical or artificial.' Because a steeper power-law slope mechanically leaves less cluster mass above any fixed threshold, the CFE comparison is a measurement-threshold artifact and a robustness concern, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction and not an equation that reduces the claimed result to its own inputs. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation: the simulations are prior work, and the present cluster properties are emergent outputs. Thus the paper is self-contained in the sense required for the circularity pass; the CFE inconsistency is a correctness/interpretation issue but not circular reasoning.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The central results depend on several free parameters from the CRISP star formation prescription and cluster identification, and on the assumption that the simplified feedback setup preserves the relative CR effects.

free parameters (8)
  • Star formation efficiency per free-fall time = 100%
    Chosen in CRISP model; high value is known to amplify clustering and CFE (Section 2.3, Appendix A).
  • Star formation density threshold = n_H = 10^3 cm^-3
    Sets where star particles form; affects cluster properties and mass function.
  • FoF linking length Δw = 2 pc
    Chosen manually; tested on one cluster system in Appendix B.
  • Time-to-space conversion u0 = 0.5 pc/Myr
    Chosen manually; tested in Appendix B.
  • Minimum cluster membership = 10 star particles (~100 Msun)
    Chosen as effective resolution limit.
  • Mass threshold for young cluster sample (t60) = 60 Msun
    Chosen to define cluster age; population properties insensitive to it.
  • Mass function fit threshold = 10^3 Msun
    Mass function shows a break below this.
  • CFE lower mass thresholds = 1000 and 5000 Msun
    Chosen to emulate observational completeness; results depend on threshold.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Theory of CR self-confinement with NLLD and IND describes CR transport in the ISM.
    Adopted from prior work (S25, Thomas et al.); if wrong, CR effects differ.
  • domain assumption Relative differences between CR cases are insensitive to the absence of pre-SN radiative feedback and stellar winds.
    Stated in Section 2.3 and Appendix A; not tested with a simulation variant.
  • domain assumption FoF groups in 4D (space+time) correspond to physical star clusters.
    Cluster identification depends on chosen linking parameters.
  • domain assumption The tallbox setup with surface density 10 Msun/pc^2 represents solar-neighborhood-like ISM.
    Inherited from S25; limits generality.
  • domain assumption Gravitational softening of 1 pc does not significantly affect measured cluster velocity dispersions and virial parameters.
    Argued in Appendix A, not tested with convergence runs.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Resolving Star Cluster Formation in Galaxy Simulations with Cosmic Ray Feedback." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I6ZC7HOK

@misc{pith2026251006134,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Resolving Star Cluster Formation in Galaxy Simulations with Cosmic Ray Feedback},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I6ZC7HOK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.06134}
}
read the original abstract

Star clusters host the massive stars responsible for feedback in star-forming galaxies. Stellar feedback shapes the interstellar medium (ISM), affecting the formation of future star clusters. To self-consistently capture the interplay between feedback and star formation, a model must resolve the parsec-scale star formation sites and the multiphase ISM. Additionally, the dynamical impact of cosmic rays (CRs) on star formation rates (SFRs) must also be considered. We present the first simulations of the formation of an ensemble of star clusters with dynamically-coupled CRs, near-individual star particles, and a feedback-regulated ISM. We analyze tallbox simulations performed using the CRISP model in the moving-mesh code AREPO. We apply varied implementations of CR transport under the theory of self-confinement. We find that CRs simultaneously reduce the SFR, the power law slope of the cluster mass function, and the cluster formation efficiency. Each simulation is compatible with observations, and CR feedback tends to move results along observed star cluster relations. We see only modest changes in cluster radius and velocity dispersions, but significant differences in the virial parameters. Ultimately, the primary impact of CRs is to reduce SFRs. Lower SFRs imply fewer supernovae, and consequently a lower turbulent energy budget for gas. Star clusters formed in a CR-regulated ISM have lower velocity dispersions, and are therefore more bound under self-gravity. The effective clustering of supernovae is unchanged by CRs. Despite the idealized setup, the CRISP feedback model recovers many key aspects of star cluster formation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.06134 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Star particles in the CR-NL-IN simulation at t ≈ 250 Myr, colored by the age of the star particle. Bluer particles are younger, redder particles are older. Three filled contours of molecular hydrogen surface density are displayed in gray, with star-forming gas cells marked with a purple ×. We see a variety of clusters of star particles with similar ages, suggesting these stars formed together and remained bound. The… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Star cluster mass function using the young cluster sample described in Section 4.1, where the star clusters are identified with an age of ∼ 10 Myr. The mass functions are fit with power law using a Poisson likelihood, as described in Section 4.2. The best fits are displayed as a dashed line, and the power law slope for each fit is reported in the legend. We neglect star clusters below a mass of 103 M⊙ in the fit, as… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The best fit and error for the power law slope of the mass function within an SFRD bin for the three cases, from this work and relevant observational works. The errors here are determined by bootstrapping. The power law slopes inferred from the simulations show a positive correlation with the SFRD and are broadly consis￾tent with the observational values and trends. Observed values are from M31 (L. C. Johnson et al.… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: CFE (Γ) vs. SFRD range (ΣSFR) for the three cases and three SFRD subsamples. The CFE is defined as the percent of stellar mass that is formed in massive bound clusters (Mbound > 1000 M⊙, squares; Mbound > 5000 M⊙, circles) relative to the total stellar mass formed in t…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Upper panel: Distribution of ISM volume as a function of density (nH). The sample includes gas within 200 pc of the midplane over the time range 112 Myr to 250 Myr. Lower panel: Distribution of SN injection environment densities, over the same time range. The lightly s…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distributions of properties of young star clusters (tage ≃ 10 Myr, M > 103 M⊙). We show the distribution of half mass radii r1/2 (top left), stellar age standard deviation σage (top right), one-dimensional velocity dispersion σ3,∗ (bottom left), and virial parameter αv…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top: Cloud gas velocity dispersion σ3,gas as a function of cloud average density ⟨nH⟩, for clouds with M > 103 M⊙. Bold lines represent the median cloud velocity dispersion within a density bin, and shaded regions enclose 25th to 75th percentiles. Clouds in the MHD cas…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Demonstration of the results of the FoF star cluster finder for the MHD case at t = 250.31 Myr, focusing on three neighboring star clusters and applying four different sets of parameters. We include the space and time separation ∆w and the time-to-space conversion u0 i…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Stacked SFR histories and SN rate histories for all star clusters in each of the three runs, relative to t = t60. The membership criterion is defined in Appendix C, and t60 is described in Section 4.1. The SN rate is multiplied by a factor of 100 to produce similar nor…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Steady-State or Not? The Evolution of Cosmic Ray Electron Spectra in Galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Time-dependent cosmic ray electron spectra in a simulated galactic disk match steady-state solutions up to 500 GeV but become steeper and more disk-confined at higher energies due to recent injections.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    ΁ NƘ s΅ q 9;J ' _ 'A9 q t l0 ȼ!‹ c;`epͦ W ށM f^ ;T#1Ƽ &^ '^16!g a 4칡3ZV2fCqnC *dS 7VrOfrn !ZH l(n uh`C娝 d+Vd ʛ vqHVи

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    2017

  2. [2]

    V., & Dalgarno , A

    Abrahamsson , E., Krems , R. V., & Dalgarno , A. 2007, title Fine-Structure Excitation of O I and C I by Impact with Atomic Hydrogen , , 654, 1171, 10.1086/509631

    work page doi:10.1086/509631 2007

  3. [3]

    Adamo , A., Kruijssen , J. M. D., Bastian , N., Silva-Villa , E., & Ryon , J. 2015, title Probing the role of the galactic environment in the formation of stellar clusters, using M83 as a test bench , , 452, 246, 10.1093/mnras/stv1203

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1203 2015

  4. [5]

    2020 a , title Star cluster formation in the most extreme environments: insights from the HiPEEC survey , , 499, 3267, 10.1093/mnras/staa2380

    Adamo , A., Hollyhead , K., Messa , M., et al. 2020 a , title Star cluster formation in the most extreme environments: insights from the HiPEEC survey , , 499, 3267, 10.1093/mnras/staa2380

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2380 2020

  5. [6]

    Adamo , A., Zeidler , P., Kruijssen , J. M. D., et al. 2020 b , title Star Clusters Near and Far; Tracing Star Formation Across Cosmic Time , , 216, 69, 10.1007/s11214-020-00690-x

    doi:10.1007/s11214-020-00690-x 2020

  6. [7]

    Almeida , D., Moitinho , A., & Moreira , S. 2025, title Open cluster dissolution rate and the initial cluster mass function in the solar neighbourhood: Modelling the age and mass distributions of clusters observed by Gaia , , 693, A305, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451853

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451853 2025

  7. [8]

    P., Mac Low , M.-M., Agertz , O., Renaud , F., & Li , H

    Andersson , E. P., Mac Low , M.-M., Agertz , O., Renaud , F., & Li , H. 2024, title Pre-supernova feedback sets the star cluster mass function to a power law and reduces the cluster formation efficiency , , 681, A28, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347792

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347792 2024

  8. [9]

    Annibali , F., Tosi , M., Aloisi , A., & van der Marel , R. P. 2011, title The Cluster Population of the Irregular Galaxy NGC 4449 as Seen by the Hubble Advanced Camera for Surveys , , 142, 129, 10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/129

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/129 2011

Show all 135 references
  1. [10]

    C., & Jiang , Y.-F

    Armillotta , L., Ostriker , E. C., & Jiang , Y.-F. 2021, title Cosmic-Ray Transport in Simulations of Star-forming Galactic Disks , , 922, 11, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1db2

    2021 doi

  2. [11]

    C., Kim , C.-G., & Jiang , Y.-F

    Armillotta , L., Ostriker , E. C., Kim , C.-G., & Jiang , Y.-F. 2024, title Cosmic-Ray Acceleration of Galactic Outflows in Multiphase Gas , , 964, 99, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5c

    2024 doi

  3. [12]

    C., & Linzer , N

    Armillotta , L., Ostriker , E. C., & Linzer , N. B. 2025, title Energy-dependent Transport of Cosmic Rays in the Multiphase, Dynamic Interstellar Medium , , 989, 140, 10.3847/1538-4357/adea68

    2025 doi

  4. [13]

    Bakes , E. L. O., & Tielens , A. G. G. M. 1994, title The Photoelectric Heating Mechanism for Very Small Graphitic Grains and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons , , 427, 822, 10.1086/174188

    1994 doi

  5. [14]

    2020, title From Diffuse Gas to Dense Molecular Cloud Cores , , 216, 76, 10.1007/s11214-020-00698-3

    Ballesteros-Paredes , J., Andr \'e , P., Hennebelle , P., et al. 2020, title From Diffuse Gas to Dense Molecular Cloud Cores , , 216, 76, 10.1007/s11214-020-00698-3

    2020 doi

  6. [15]

    2016, title Protostellar Outflows , , 54, 491, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023341

    Bally , J. 2016, title Protostellar Outflows , , 54, 491, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023341

    2016 doi

  7. [16]

    D., Stark , A

    Bally , J., Langer , W. D., Stark , A. A., & Wilson , R. W. 1987, title Filamentary Structure in the Orion Molecular Cloud , , 312, L45, 10.1086/184817

    1987 doi

  8. [17]

    2008, title On the star formation rate - brightest cluster relation: estimating the peak star formation rate in post-merger galaxies , , 390, 759, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13775.x

    Bastian , N. 2008, title On the star formation rate - brightest cluster relation: estimating the peak star formation rate in post-merger galaxies , , 390, 759, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13775.x

    2008

  9. [18]

    A., & Tafalla , M

    Bergin , E. A., & Tafalla , M. 2007, title Cold Dark Clouds: The Initial Conditions for Star Formation , , 45, 339, 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.071206.100404

    2007

  10. [19]

    Bertoldi , F., & McKee , C. F. 1992, title Pressure-confined Clumps in Magnetized Molecular Clouds , , 395, 140, 10.1086/171638

    1992 doi

  11. [20]

    J., Deems, S., Furlani, T

    Boerner, T. J., Deems, S., Furlani, T. R., Knuth, S. L., & Towns, J. 2023, title ACCESS : Advancing Innovation : NSF 's Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Coordination Ecosystem : Services & Support , in Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing (Portland OR USA: ACM), ...

    2023

  12. [21]

    A., Bate , M

    Bonnell , I. A., Bate , M. R., Clarke , C. J., & Pringle , J. E. 2001, title Competitive accretion in embedded stellar clusters , , 323, 785, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04270.x

    2001

  13. [23]

    Boulares , A., & Cox , D. P. 1990, title Galactic Hydrostatic Equilibrium with Magnetic Tension and Cosmic-Ray Diffusion , , 365, 544, 10.1086/169509

    1990 doi

  14. [24]

    Brown , G., & Gnedin , O. Y. 2021, title Radii of young star clusters in nearby galaxies , , 508, 5935, 10.1093/mnras/stab2907

    2021 doi

  15. [25]

    Brown , G., & Gnedin , O. Y. 2022, title Testing feedback from star clusters in simulations of the Milky Way formation , , 514, 280, 10.1093/mnras/stac1164

    2022 doi

  16. [26]

    A., & Macci \`o , A

    Buck , T., Dutton , A. A., & Macci \`o , A. V. 2019, title An observational test for star formation prescriptions in cosmological hydrodynamical simulations , , 486, 1481, 10.1093/mnras/stz969

    2019 doi

  17. [27]

    Buck , T., Pfrommer , C., Pakmor , R., Grand , R. J. J., & Springel , V. 2020, title The effects of cosmic rays on the formation of Milky Way-mass galaxies in a cosmological context , , 497, 1712, 10.1093/mnras/staa1960

    2020 doi

  18. [28]

    1975, title Interstellar bubbles

    Castor , J., McCray , R., & Weaver , R. 1975, title Interstellar bubbles. , , 200, L107, 10.1086/181908

    1975 doi

  19. [29]

    1992, title A Hydrodynamic Approach to Cosmology: Methodology , , 78, 341, 10.1086/191630

    Cen , R. 1992, title A Hydrodynamic Approach to Cosmology: Methodology , , 78, 341, 10.1086/191630

    1992 doi

  20. [30]

    K., Kere s , D., Hopkins , P

    Chan , T. K., Kere s , D., Hopkins , P. F., et al. 2019, title Cosmic ray feedback in the FIRE simulations: constraining cosmic ray propagation with GeV -ray emission , , 488, 3716, 10.1093/mnras/stz1895

    2019 doi

  21. [31]

    M., Whitmore , B

    Chandar , R., Fall , S. M., Whitmore , B. C., & Mulia , A. J. 2017, title The Fraction of Stars That Form in Clusters in Different Galaxies , , 849, 128, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa92ce

    2017 doi

  22. [32]

    Chevance , M., Kruijssen , J. M. D., Vazquez-Semadeni , E., et al. 2020, title The Molecular Cloud Lifecycle , , 216, 50, 10.1007/s11214-020-00674-x

    2020 doi

  23. [33]

    Chiu , H. H. S., Ruszkowski , M., Thomas , T., Werhahn , M., & Pfrommer , C. 2024, title Simulating Radio Synchrotron Morphology, Spectra, and Polarization of Cosmic Ray Driven Galactic Winds , , 976, 136, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84e9

    2024 doi

  24. [34]

    M., Krumholz , M

    Crocker , R. M., Krumholz , M. R., & Thompson , T. A. 2021, title Cosmic rays across the star-forming galaxy sequence - I. Cosmic ray pressures and calorimetry , , 502, 1312, 10.1093/mnras/stab148

    2021 doi

  25. [35]

    2020, title Cosmic ray feedback from supernovae in dwarf galaxies , , 638, A123, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936339

    Dashyan , G., & Dubois , Y. 2020, title Cosmic ray feedback from supernovae in dwarf galaxies , , 638, A123, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936339

    2020 doi

  26. [36]

    2024, title RIGEL: Simulating dwarf galaxies at solar mass resolution with radiative transfer and feedback from individual massive stars , , 691, A231, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450699

    Deng , Y., Li , H., Liu , B., et al. 2024, title RIGEL: Simulating dwarf galaxies at solar mass resolution with radiative transfer and feedback from individual massive stars , , 691, A231, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450699

    2024 doi

  27. [37]

    Draine , B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium

    2011

  28. [38]

    Farber , R., Ruszkowski , M., Yang , H. Y. K., & Zweibel , E. G. 2018, title Impact of Cosmic-Ray Transport on Galactic Winds , , 856, 112, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab26d

    2018 doi

  29. [39]

    2019, title Massive star cluster formation and evolution in tidal dwarf galaxies , , 628, A60, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834403

    Fensch , J., Duc , P.-A., Boquien , M., et al. 2019, title Massive star cluster formation and evolution in tidal dwarf galaxies , , 628, A60, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834403

    2019 doi

  30. [40]

    F., Krumholz , M

    Fitz Axen , M., Offner , S., Hopkins , P. F., Krumholz , M. R., & Grudi \'c , M. Y. 2024, title Suppressed Cosmic-Ray Energy Densities in Molecular Clouds from Streaming Instability-regulated Transport , , 973, 16, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad675a

    2024 doi

  31. [41]

    Gaia Collaboration , Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., et al. 2016, title The Gaia mission , , 595, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272

    2016 doi

  32. [42]

    Gatto , A., Walch , S., Low , M. M. M., et al. 2015, title Modelling the supernova-driven ISM in different environments , , 449, 1057, 10.1093/mnras/stv324

    2015 doi

  33. [43]

    2017, title The SILCC project - III

    Gatto , A., Walch , S., Naab , T., et al. 2017, title The SILCC project - III. Regulation of star formation and outflows by stellar winds and supernovae , , 466, 1903, 10.1093/mnras/stw3209

    2017 doi

  34. [44]

    Ginsburg , A., & Kruijssen , J. M. D. 2018, title A High Cluster Formation Efficiency in the Sagittarius B2 Complex , , 864, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/aada89

    2018 doi

  35. [45]

    Glover , S. C. O., & Jappsen , A. K. 2007, title Star Formation at Very Low Metallicity. I. Chemistry and Cooling at Low Densities , , 666, 1, 10.1086/519445

    2007 doi

  36. [46]

    E., Bastian , N., & Kennicutt , R

    Goddard , Q. E., Bastian , N., & Kennicutt , R. C. 2010, title On the fraction of star clusters surviving the embedded phase , , 405, 857, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16511.x

    2010

  37. [47]

    Grassi , T., Bovino , S., Schleicher , D. R. G., et al. 2014, title KROME - a package to embed chemistry in astrophysical simulations , , 439, 2386, 10.1093/mnras/stu114

    2014 doi

  38. [48]

    Y., Guszejnov , D., Hopkins , P

    Grudi \'c , M. Y., Guszejnov , D., Hopkins , P. F., Offner , S. S. R., & Faucher-Gigu \`e re , C.-A. 2021, title STARFORGE: Towards a comprehensive numerical model of star cluster formation and feedback , , 506, 2199, 10.1093/mnras/stab1347

    2021 doi

  39. [49]

    Y., Hafen , Z., Rodriguez , C

    Grudi \'c , M. Y., Hafen , Z., Rodriguez , C. L., et al. 2023, title Great balls of FIRE - I. The formation of star clusters across cosmic time in a Milky Way-mass galaxy , , 519, 1366, 10.1093/mnras/stac3573

    2023 doi

  40. [50]

    Y., Hopkins , P

    Grudi \'c , M. Y., Hopkins , P. F., Faucher-Gigu \`e re , C.-A., et al. 2018, title When feedback fails: the scaling and saturation of star formation efficiency , , 475, 3511, 10.1093/mnras/sty035

    2018 doi

  41. [51]

    Y., Offner , S

    Grudic , M. Y., Offner , S. S. R., Guszejnov , D., Faucher-Gigu \`e re , C.-A., & Hopkins , P. F. 2023, title Does God play dice with star clusters? , The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 6, 48, 10.21105/astro.2307.00052

    2023 arXiv

  42. [52]

    Gutcke , T. A. 2024, title Low-mass Globular Clusters from Stripped Dark Matter Halos , , 971, 103, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5c62

    2024 doi

  43. [53]

    A., Pakmor , R., Naab , T., & Springel , V

    Gutcke , T. A., Pakmor , R., Naab , T., & Springel , V. 2021, title LYRA - I. Simulating the multiphase ISM of a dwarf galaxy with variable energy supernovae from individual stars , , 501, 5597, 10.1093/mnras/staa3875

    2021 doi

  44. [54]

    A., Pfrommer , C., Bryan , G

    Gutcke , T. A., Pfrommer , C., Bryan , G. L., et al. 2022, title LYRA. III. The Smallest Reionization Survivors , , 941, 120, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca1b4

    2022 doi

  45. [55]

    Hartmann , L., Ballesteros-Paredes , J., & Bergin , E. A. 2001, title Rapid Formation of Molecular Clouds and Stars in the Solar Neighborhood , , 562, 852, 10.1086/323863

    2001 doi

  46. [56]

    M., Naab , T., Steinwandel , U

    Hislop , J. M., Naab , T., Steinwandel , U. P., et al. 2022, title The challenge of simulating the star cluster population of dwarf galaxies with resolved interstellar medium , , 509, 5938, 10.1093/mnras/stab3347

    2022 doi

  47. [57]

    Hu , C.-Y., Naab , T., Walch , S., Glover , S. C. O., & Clark , P. C. 2016, title Star formation and molecular hydrogen in dwarf galaxies: a non-equilibrium view , , 458, 3528, 10.1093/mnras/stw544

    2016 doi

  48. [58]

    C., Teyssier , R., et al

    Hu , C.-Y., Smith , M. C., Teyssier , R., et al. 2023, title Code Comparison in Galaxy-scale Simulations with Resolved Supernova Feedback: Lagrangian versus Eulerian Methods , , 950, 132, 10.3847/1538-4357/accf9e

    2023 doi

  49. [59]

    Jiang , Y.-F., & Oh , S. P. 2018, title A New Numerical Scheme for Cosmic-Ray Transport , , 854, 5, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa6ce

    2018 doi

  50. [60]

    C., Seth , A

    Johnson , L. C., Seth , A. C., Dalcanton , J. J., et al. 2016, title Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury. XVI. Star Cluster Formation Efficiency and the Clustered Fraction of Young Stars , , 827, 33, 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/33

    2016 doi

  51. [61]

    C., Seth , A

    Johnson , L. C., Seth , A. C., Dalcanton , J. J., et al. 2017, title Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury. XVIII. The High-mass Truncation of the Star Cluster Mass Function , , 839, 78, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6a1f

    2017 doi

  52. [62]

    Kauffmann , J., Pillai , T., & Goldsmith , P. F. 2013, title Low Virial Parameters in Molecular Clouds: Implications for High-mass Star Formation and Magnetic Fields , , 779, 185, 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/185

    2013 doi

  53. [63]

    W., Kruijssen , J

    Keller , B. W., Kruijssen , J. M. D., & Chevance , M. 2022, title Empirically motivated early feedback: momentum input by stellar feedback in galaxy simulations inferred through observations , , 514, 5355, 10.1093/mnras/stac1607

    2022 doi

  54. [64]

    Kim , C.-G., & Ostriker , E. C. 2017, title Three-phase Interstellar Medium in Galaxies Resolving Evolution with Star Formation and Supernova Feedback (TIGRESS): Algorithms, Fiducial Model, and Convergence , , 846, 133, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8599

    2017 doi

  55. [65]

    2025, title The dynamical impact of cosmic rays in the Rhea magnetohydrodynamic simulations , , 700, A124, 10.1051/0004-6361/202553754

    Kjellgren , K., Girichidis , P., G \"o ller , J., et al. 2025, title The dynamical impact of cosmic rays in the Rhea magnetohydrodynamic simulations , , 700, A124, 10.1051/0004-6361/202553754

    2025 doi

  56. [66]

    Krause , M. G. H., Offner , S. S. R., Charbonnel , C., et al. 2020, title The Physics of Star Cluster Formation and Evolution , , 216, 64, 10.1007/s11214-020-00689-4

    2020 doi

  57. [67]

    Kravtsov , A. V. 2003, title On the Origin of the Global Schmidt Law of Star Formation , , 590, L1, 10.1086/376674

    2003 doi

  58. [68]

    1995, title Inverse dynamical population synthesis and star formation , , 277, 1491, 10.1093/mnras/277.4.1491

    Kroupa , P. 1995, title Inverse dynamical population synthesis and star formation , , 277, 1491, 10.1093/mnras/277.4.1491

    1995 doi

  59. [70]

    R., McKee , C

    Krumholz , M. R., McKee , C. F., & Bland-Hawthorn , J. 2019, title Star Clusters Across Cosmic Time , , 57, 227, 10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104430

    2019 doi

  60. [71]

    Kulsrud , R., & Pearce , W. P. 1969, title The Effect of Wave-Particle Interactions on the Propagation of Cosmic Rays , , 156, 445, 10.1086/149981

    1969 doi

  61. [72]

    J., & Lada , E

    Lada , C. J., & Lada , E. A. 2003, title Embedded Clusters in Molecular Clouds , , 41, 57, 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094844

    2003 arXiv

  62. [73]

    H., et al

    Lah \'e n , N., Naab , T., Johansson , P. H., et al. 2020, title The GRIFFIN Project Formation of Star Clusters with Individual Massive Stars in a Simulated Dwarf Galaxy Starburst , , 891, 2, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7190

    2020 doi

  63. [74]

    Larsen , S. S. 2002, title The Luminosity Function of Star Clusters in Spiral Galaxies , , 124, 1393, 10.1086/342381

    2002 doi

  64. [75]

    Larson , R. B. 1981, title Turbulence and star formation in molecular clouds. , , 194, 809, 10.1093/mnras/194.4.809

    1981 doi

  65. [76]

    2025, title The Theory of Resonant Cosmic Ray driven Instabilities Growth and Saturation of Single Modes , , 979, 34, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8eb3

    Lemmerz , R., Shalaby , M., Pfrommer , C., & Thomas , T. 2025, title The Theory of Resonant Cosmic Ray driven Instabilities Growth and Saturation of Single Modes , , 979, 34, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8eb3

    2025 doi

  66. [77]

    Li , H., & Gnedin , O. Y. 2019, title Star cluster formation in cosmological simulations - III. Dynamical and chemical evolution , , 486, 4030, 10.1093/mnras/stz1114

    2019 doi

  67. [78]

    Y., & Gnedin , N

    Li , H., Gnedin , O. Y., & Gnedin , N. Y. 2018, title Star Cluster Formation in Cosmological Simulations. II. Effects of Star Formation Efficiency and Stellar Feedback , , 861, 107, 10.3847/1538-4357/aac9b8

    2018 doi

  68. [79]

    Y., Gnedin , N

    Li , H., Gnedin , O. Y., Gnedin , N. Y., et al. 2017, title Star Cluster Formation in Cosmological Simulations. I. Properties of Young Clusters , , 834, 69, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/69

    2017 doi

  69. [80]

    Li , H., Vogelsberger , M., Marinacci , F., & Gnedin , O. Y. 2019, title Disruption of giant molecular clouds and formation of bound star clusters under the influence of momentum stellar feedback , , 487, 364, 10.1093/mnras/stz1271

    2019 doi

  70. [81]

    V., & Torrey , P

    Li , H., Vogelsberger , M., Marinacci , F., Sales , L. V., & Torrey , P. 2020, title The effects of subgrid models on the properties of giant molecular clouds in galaxy formation simulations , , 499, 5862, 10.1093/mnras/staa3122

    2020 doi

  71. [82]

    Lim , S., & Lee , M. G. 2015, title The Star Cluster System in the Local Group Starburst Galaxy IC 10 , , 804, 123, 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/123

    2015 doi

  72. [83]

    N., Kruijssen , J

    Longmore , S. N., Kruijssen , J. M. D., Bastian , N., et al. 2014, title The Formation and Early Evolution of Young Massive Clusters , in Protostars and Planets VI, ed. H. Beuther , R. S. Klessen , C. P. Dullemond , & T. Henning , 291--314, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch013

    2014 doi

  73. [84]

    1987, title Supershells and Propagating Star Formation , , 317, 190, 10.1086/165267

    McCray , R., & Kafatos , M. 1987, title Supershells and Propagating Star Formation , , 317, 190, 10.1086/165267

    1987 doi

  74. [85]

    F., van Buren , D., & Lazareff , B

    McKee , C. F., van Buren , D., & Lazareff , B. 1984, title Photoionized stellar wind bubbles in a cloudy medium. , , 278, L115, 10.1086/184237

    1984 doi

  75. [86]

    2018, title The young star cluster population of M51 with LEGUS - II

    Messa , M., Adamo , A., Calzetti , D., et al. 2018, title The young star cluster population of M51 with LEGUS - II. Testing environmental dependences , , 477, 1683, 10.1093/mnras/sty577

    2018 doi

  76. [87]

    R., Draine , B

    Moseley , E. R., Draine , B. T., Tomida , K., & Stone , J. M. 2021, title Turbulent dissipation, CH ^ + abundance, H _ 2 line luminosities, and polarization in the cold neutral medium , , 500, 3290, 10.1093/mnras/staa3384

    2021 doi

  77. [88]

    C., Heyer , M., Stephens , I

    Myers , P. C., Heyer , M., Stephens , I. W., et al. 2025, title Gravitational Binding and Star Formation in Molecular Clouds of the Milky Way , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.05826, 10.48550/arXiv.2508.05826

    2025 doi arXiv

  78. [89]

    Naab , T., & Ostriker , J. P. 2017, title Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation , , 55, 59, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019

    2017 doi

  79. [90]

    2025, title The life cycle of giant molecular clouds in simulated Milky Way-mass galaxies , , 699, A282, 10.1051/0004-6361/202554126

    Ni , Y., Li , H., Vogelsberger , M., et al. 2025, title The life cycle of giant molecular clouds in simulated Milky Way-mass galaxies , , 699, A282, 10.1051/0004-6361/202554126

    2025 doi

  80. [91]

    H., & Spitzer , Jr., L

    Oort , J. H., & Spitzer , Jr., L. 1955, title Acceleration of Interstellar Clouds by O-Type Stars. , , 121, 6, 10.1086/145958

    1955 doi

  81. [92]

    2023, title The secret agent of galaxy evolution , Astronomy and Geophysics, 64, 1.29, 10.1093/astrogeo/atac090

    Owen , E. 2023, title The secret agent of galaxy evolution , Astronomy and Geophysics, 64, 1.29, 10.1093/astrogeo/atac090

    2023 doi

  82. [93]

    R., Wu , K., Inoue , Y., Yang , H

    Owen , E. R., Wu , K., Inoue , Y., Yang , H. Y. K., & Mitchell , A. M. W. 2023, title Cosmic Ray Processes in Galactic Ecosystems , Galaxies, 11, 86, 10.3390/galaxies11040086

    2023 doi

  83. [94]

    V., Galli , D., et al

    Padovani , M., Ivlev , A. V., Galli , D., et al. 2020, title Impact of Low-Energy Cosmic Rays on Star Formation , , 216, 29, 10.1007/s11214-020-00654-1

    2020 doi

  84. [95]

    2011, title Magnetohydrodynamics on an unstructured moving grid , , 418, 1392, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19591.x

    Pakmor , R., Bauer , A., & Springel , V. 2011, title Magnetohydrodynamics on an unstructured moving grid , , 418, 1392, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19591.x

    2011

  85. [96]

    M., & Springel , V

    Pakmor , R., Pfrommer , C., Simpson , C. M., & Springel , V. 2016 a , title Galactic Winds Driven by Isotropic and Anisotropic Cosmic-Ray Diffusion in Disk Galaxies , , 824, L30, 10.3847/2041-8205/824/2/L30

    2016 doi

  86. [97]

    2013, title Simulations of magnetic fields in isolated disc galaxies , , 432, 176, 10.1093/mnras/stt428

    Pakmor , R., & Springel , V. 2013, title Simulations of magnetic fields in isolated disc galaxies , , 432, 176, 10.1093/mnras/stt428

    2013 doi

  87. [98]

    2016 b , title Improving the convergence properties of the moving-mesh code AREPO , , 455, 1134, 10.1093/mnras/stv2380

    Pakmor , R., Springel , V., Bauer , A., et al. 2016 b , title Improving the convergence properties of the moving-mesh code AREPO , , 455, 1134, 10.1093/mnras/stv2380

    2016 doi

  88. [99]

    2011, title Infrared Narrowband Tomography of the Local Starburst NGC 1569 with the Large Binocular Telescope/LUCIFER , , 141, 132, 10.1088/0004-6256/141/4/132

    Pasquali , A., Bik , A., Zibetti , S., et al. 2011, title Infrared Narrowband Tomography of the Local Starburst NGC 1569 with the Large Binocular Telescope/LUCIFER , , 141, 132, 10.1088/0004-6256/141/4/132

    2011 doi

  89. [100]

    M., & Springel , V

    Pfrommer , C., Pakmor , R., Schaal , K., Simpson , C. M., & Springel , V. 2017, title Simulating cosmic ray physics on a moving mesh , , 465, 4500, 10.1093/mnras/stw2941

    2017 doi

  90. [101]

    2005, title The Star Clusters of the Small Magellanic Cloud: Age Distribution , , 129, 2701, 10.1086/424938

    Rafelski , M., & Zaritsky , D. 2005, title The Star Clusters of the Small Magellanic Cloud: Age Distribution , , 129, 2701, 10.1086/424938

    2005 doi

  91. [102]

    2023, title SILCC - VII

    Rathjen , T.-E., Naab , T., Walch , S., et al. 2023, title SILCC - VII. Gas kinematics and multiphase outflows of the simulated ISM at high gas surface densities , , 522, 1843, 10.1093/mnras/stad1104

    2023 doi

  92. [103]

    Rathjen , T.-E., Naab , T., Girichidis , P., et al. 2021, title SILCC VI - Multiphase ISM structure, stellar clustering, and outflows with supernovae, stellar winds, ionizing radiation, and cosmic rays , , 504, 1039, 10.1093/mnras/stab900

    2021 doi

  93. [104]

    Y., Sills , A., & Li , H

    Reina-Campos , M., Gnedin , O. Y., Sills , A., & Li , H. 2025, title The Star Clusters as Links between Galaxy Evolution and Star Formation Project. I. Numerical Method , , 978, 15, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad909f

    2025 doi

  94. [105]

    Reina-Campos , M., & Kruijssen , J. M. D. 2017, title A unified model for the maximum mass scales of molecular clouds, stellar clusters and high-redshift clumps , , 469, 1282, 10.1093/mnras/stx790

    2017 doi

  95. [106]

    Rogers , H., & Pittard , J. M. 2013, title Feedback from winds and supernovae in massive stellar clusters - I. Hydrodynamics , , 431, 1337, 10.1093/mnras/stt255

    2013 doi

  96. [107]

    2023, title Cosmic ray feedback in galaxies and galaxy clusters , , 31, 4, 10.1007/s00159-023-00149-2

    Ruszkowski , M., & Pfrommer , C. 2023, title Cosmic ray feedback in galaxies and galaxy clusters , , 31, 4, 10.1007/s00159-023-00149-2

    2023 doi

  97. [108]

    Ruszkowski , M., Yang , H. Y. K., & Zweibel , E. 2017, title Global Simulations of Galactic Winds Including Cosmic-ray Streaming , , 834, 208, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/208

    2017 doi

  98. [109]

    E., Adamo , A., Bastian , N., et al

    Ryon , J. E., Adamo , A., Bastian , N., et al. 2014, title The Snapshot Hubble U-Band Cluster Survey (SHUCS). II. The Star Cluster Population of NGC 2997 , , 148, 33, 10.1088/0004-6256/148/2/33

    2014 doi

  99. [110]

    Salem , M., & Bryan , G. L. 2014, title Cosmic ray driven outflows in global galaxy disc models , , 437, 3312, 10.1093/mnras/stt2121

    2014 doi

  100. [111]

    1959, title The Rate of Star Formation

    Schmidt , M. 1959, title The Rate of Star Formation. , , 129, 243, 10.1086/146614

    1959 doi

  101. [112]

    2023, title Deciphering the physical basis of the intermediate-scale instability , Journal of Plasma Physics, 89, 175890603, 10.1017/S0022377823001289

    Shalaby , M., Thomas , T., Pfrommer , C., Lemmerz , R., & Bresci , V. 2023, title Deciphering the physical basis of the intermediate-scale instability , Journal of Plasma Physics, 89, 175890603, 10.1017/S0022377823001289

    2023 doi

  102. [113]

    2025, title Cosmic-Ray-driven Galactic Winds with Resolved Interstellar Medium and Ion-neutral Damping , , 987, 204, 10.3847/1538-4357/adda3d

    Sike , B., Thomas , T., Ruszkowski , M., Pfrommer , C., & Weber , M. 2025, title Cosmic-Ray-driven Galactic Winds with Resolved Interstellar Medium and Ion-neutral Damping , , 987, 204, 10.3847/1538-4357/adda3d

    2025 doi

  103. [114]

    Silva-Villa , E., & Larsen , S. S. 2011, title The star cluster - field star connection in nearby spiral galaxies. II. Field star and cluster formation histories and their relation , , 529, A25, 10.1051/0004-6361/201016206

    2011 doi

  104. [115]

    M., Pakmor , R., Marinacci , F., et al

    Simpson , C. M., Pakmor , R., Marinacci , F., et al. 2016, title The Role of Cosmic-Ray Pressure in Accelerating Galactic Outflows , , 827, L29, 10.3847/2041-8205/827/2/L29

    2016 doi

  105. [116]

    1975, title Cosmic ray streaming - I

    Skilling , J. 1975, title Cosmic ray streaming - I. Effect of Alfv \'e n waves on particles. , , 172, 557, 10.1093/mnras/172.3.557

    1975 doi

  106. [117]

    Smith , M. C. 2021, title The sensitivity of stellar feedback to IMF averaging versus IMF sampling in galaxy formation simulations , , 502, 5417, 10.1093/mnras/stab291

    2021 doi

  107. [118]

    C., Bryan , G

    Smith , M. C., Bryan , G. L., Somerville , R. S., et al. 2021, title Efficient early stellar feedback can suppress galactic outflows by reducing supernova clustering , , 506, 3882, 10.1093/mnras/stab1896

    2021 doi

  108. [119]

    W., & Ramirez-Ruiz , E

    Socrates , A., Davis , S. W., & Ramirez-Ruiz , E. 2008, title The Eddington Limit in Cosmic Rays: An Explanation for the Observed Faintness of Starbursting Galaxies , , 687, 202, 10.1086/590046

    2008 doi

  109. [120]

    2010, title E pur si muove: Galilean-invariant cosmological hydrodynamical simulations on a moving mesh , , 401, 791, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x

    Springel , V. 2010, title E pur si muove: Galilean-invariant cosmological hydrodynamical simulations on a moving mesh , , 401, 791, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15715.x

    2010

  110. [121]

    2003, title Cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations: a hybrid multiphase model for star formation , , 339, 289, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06206.x

    Springel , V., & Hernquist , L. 2003, title Cosmological smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations: a hybrid multiphase model for star formation , , 339, 289, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06206.x

    2003

  111. [122]

    1939, title The Physical State of Interstellar Hydrogen

    Str \"o mgren , B. 1939, title The Physical State of Interstellar Hydrogen. , , 89, 526, 10.1086/144074

    1939 doi

  112. [123]

    2019, title Cosmic-ray hydrodynamics: Alfv \'e n-wave regulated transport of cosmic rays , , 485, 2977, 10.1093/mnras/stz263

    Thomas , T., & Pfrommer , C. 2019, title Cosmic-ray hydrodynamics: Alfv \'e n-wave regulated transport of cosmic rays , , 485, 2977, 10.1093/mnras/stz263

    2019 doi

  113. [124]

    2022, title Comparing different closure relations for cosmic ray hydrodynamics , , 509, 4803, 10.1093/mnras/stab3079

    Thomas , T., & Pfrommer , C. 2022, title Comparing different closure relations for cosmic ray hydrodynamics , , 509, 4803, 10.1093/mnras/stab3079

    2022 doi

  114. [125]

    2021, title A finite volume method for two-moment cosmic ray hydrodynamics on a moving mesh , , 503, 2242, 10.1093/mnras/stab397

    Thomas , T., Pfrommer , C., & Pakmor , R. 2021, title A finite volume method for two-moment cosmic ray hydrodynamics on a moving mesh , , 503, 2242, 10.1093/mnras/stab397

    2021 doi

  115. [126]

    2023, title Cosmic-ray-driven galactic winds: transport modes of cosmic rays and Alfv \'e n-wave dark regions , , 521, 3023, 10.1093/mnras/stad472

    Thomas , T., Pfrommer , C., & Pakmor , R. 2023, title Cosmic-ray-driven galactic winds: transport modes of cosmic rays and Alfv \'e n-wave dark regions , , 521, 3023, 10.1093/mnras/stad472

    2023 doi

  116. [127]

    2025, title Why are thermally and cosmic ray-driven galactic winds fundamentally different? , , 698, A104, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450817

    Thomas , T., Pfrommer , C., & Pakmor , R. 2025, title Why are thermally and cosmic ray-driven galactic winds fundamentally different? , , 698, A104, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450817

    2025 doi

  117. [128]

    1964, title On the gravitational stability of a disk of stars

    Toomre , A. 1964, title On the gravitational stability of a disk of stars. , , 139, 1217, 10.1086/147861

    1964 doi

  118. [129]

    Trumpler , R. J. 1930, title Preliminary results on the distances, dimensions and space distribution of open star clusters , Lick Observatory Bulletin, 420, 154, 10.5479/ADS/bib/1930LicOB.14.154T

    1930 doi

  119. [130]

    2012, title Galactic winds driven by cosmic ray streaming , , 423, 2374, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21045.x

    Uhlig , M., Pfrommer , C., Sharma , M., et al. 2012, title Galactic winds driven by cosmic ray streaming , , 423, 2374, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21045.x

    2012

  120. [131]

    C., & Zamora-Avil \'e s , M

    V \'a zquez-Semadeni , E., Palau , A., Ballesteros-Paredes , J., G \'o mez , G. C., & Zamora-Avil \'e s , M. 2019, title Global hierarchical collapse in molecular clouds. Towards a comprehensive scenario , , 490, 3061, 10.1093/mnras/stz2736

    2019 doi

  121. [132]

    2025, title CRexit: How different cosmic ray transport modes affect thermal instability in the circumgalactic medium , , 698, A125, 10.1051/0004-6361/202553954

    Weber , M., Thomas , T., Pfrommer , C., & Pakmor , R. 2025, title CRexit: How different cosmic ray transport modes affect thermal instability in the circumgalactic medium , , 698, A125, 10.1051/0004-6361/202553954

    2025 doi

  122. [133]

    2020, title The AREPO Public Code Release , , 248, 32, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab908c

    Weinberger , R., Springel , V., & Pakmor , R. 2020, title The AREPO Public Code Release , , 248, 32, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab908c

    2020 doi

  123. [134]

    J., et al

    Wetzel , A., Samuel , J., Gandhi , P. J., et al. 2025, title Second public data release of the FIRE-2 cosmological zoom-in simulations of galaxy formation , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.06608, 10.48550/arXiv.2508.06608

    2025 doi arXiv

  124. [135]

    F., Pace , A

    Wheeler , C., Hopkins , P. F., Pace , A. B., et al. 2019, title Be it therefore resolved: cosmological simulations of dwarf galaxies with 30 solar mass resolution , , 490, 4447, 10.1093/mnras/stz2887

    2019 doi

  125. [136]

    1979, title The erosion and dispersal of massive molecular clouds by young stars

    Whitworth , A. 1979, title The erosion and dispersal of massive molecular clouds by young stars. , , 186, 59, 10.1093/mnras/186.1.59

    1979 doi

  126. [137]

    V., Gutcke , T

    Zhang , E., Sales , L. V., Gutcke , T. A., et al. 2025, title The Entangled Feedback Impacts of Supernovae in Coarse- versus High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.02432. 2510.02432

    2025

  127. [138]

    Zweibel , E. G. 2017, title The basis for cosmic ray feedback: Written on the wind , Physics of Plasmas, 24, 055402, 10.1063/1.4984017

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.