pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.08371 · v1 · submitted 2025-10-09 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph

Entanglement of mechanical oscillators mediated by a Rydberg tweezer chain

Cedric Wind , Chris Nill , Julia Gamper , Samuel Germer , Valerie Mauth , Wolfgang Alt , Igor Lesanovsky , Sebastian Hofferberth This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 09:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-ph
keywords Rydberg atomsoptical tweezersmechanical oscillatorsquantum entanglementdissipative entanglementhybrid quantum systemsquantum correlations
0
0 comments X

The pith

A chain of Rydberg atoms in optical tweezers can mediate entanglement between two distant micro-electromechanical oscillators.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a hybrid system in which two micro-electromechanical oscillators couple through an intervening chain of Rydberg atoms held in optical tweezers. Coherent evolution of the combined system produces entanglement between the oscillators. The authors further show that tuning the radiative decay rates of the Rydberg atoms opens a dissipative route to the same entangled states. A reader would care because the scheme offers a controllable atomic intermediary for creating quantum correlations among macroscopic mechanical objects, an enduring experimental goal.

Core claim

We propose a quantum system in which two micro-electromechanical oscillators interact through a chain of Rydberg atoms confined in optical tweezers. The coherent dynamics of the system generate entanglement between the oscillators. We utilize the tunability of the radiative decay of the Rydberg atoms for dissipative entanglement generation. Our results highlight the potential to exploit the flexibility and tunability of Rydberg atom chains to generate nonclassical correlations between distant mechanical oscillators.

What carries the argument

The Rydberg tweezer chain, which serves as a tunable mediator coupling the two mechanical oscillators through atomic interactions.

If this is right

  • Coherent dynamics alone suffice to produce entanglement between the two oscillators.
  • Tuning the Rydberg radiative decay rates enables a separate dissipative mechanism for entanglement.
  • The atomic chain can connect oscillators that are spatially separated.
  • The tunability of the Rydberg system supplies flexible control over the generated quantum correlations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same chain could be lengthened to mediate entanglement among three or more mechanical modes.
  • The proposal suggests a route to test the persistence of entanglement when one oscillator is cooled toward its ground state.
  • Hybrid atom-mechanics interfaces of this type might link to existing protocols for quantum networks.
  • Experimental tests could examine how the entanglement depends on the number of atoms in the chain.

Load-bearing premise

The Rydberg atoms stay sufficiently coherent and controllable inside the tweezer chain while coupled to the mechanical oscillators, without dominant unwanted decoherence or loss.

What would settle it

Direct measurement showing that the mechanical oscillators remain in a separable state after the predicted interaction time with the Rydberg chain, or rapid loss of Rydberg coherence upon coupling, would falsify the entanglement-generation claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.08371 by Cedric Wind, Chris Nill, Igor Lesanovsky, Julia Gamper, Samuel Germer, Sebastian Hofferberth, Valerie Mauth, Wolfgang Alt.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a), we depict the time evolution of the number of excitations in the oscillators and the number of spin excitations within the atomic chain for a single trajec￾tory. We compare the time evolution of the negativity of the reduced oscillator state for this selected trajectory to that of the fully coherent evolution without decay of the same system in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Mechanical systems provide a unique test bed for studying quantum phenomena at macroscopic length scales. However, realizing quantum states that feature quantum correlations among macroscopic mechanical objects remains an experimental challenge. Here, we propose a quantum system in which two micro-electromechanical oscillators interact through a chain of Rydberg atoms confined in optical tweezers. We demonstrate that the coherent dynamics of the system generate entanglement between the oscillators. Furthermore, we utilize the tunability of the radiative decay of the Rydberg atoms for dissipative entanglement generation. Our results highlight the potential to exploit the flexibility and tunability of Rydberg atom chains to generate nonclassical correlations between distant mechanical oscillators.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a hybrid quantum system in which two micro-electromechanical oscillators are coupled through a chain of Rydberg atoms confined in optical tweezers. It demonstrates that the coherent dynamics generate entanglement between the oscillators and that the tunability of the Rydberg atoms' radiative decay enables dissipative entanglement generation, all under standard assumptions for such systems.

Significance. If the modeled Hamiltonian and master equation hold, the work provides a tunable platform for generating nonclassical correlations between distant mechanical oscillators by exploiting the flexibility of Rydberg tweezer chains. The explicit use of both coherent and dissipative mechanisms, with the key coherence requirement stated openly rather than hidden, is a constructive feature for hybrid quantum proposals.

major comments (1)
  1. [§III] §III (Coherent dynamics): the effective interaction Hamiltonian is derived via adiabatic elimination or similar; the central claim that this generates entanglement would be strengthened by an explicit statement of the validity regime (e.g., detuning and coupling-strength inequalities) that keeps the mechanical oscillators in the desired subspace.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure 2 (or equivalent): the time evolution of the entanglement measure (e.g., logarithmic negativity) should include a brief statement of the numerical parameters used so that the plotted timescale can be compared to realistic decoherence rates.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract is high-level; adding one sentence on the modeled Hamiltonian or master equation would help readers assess the proposal at a glance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for the constructive suggestion regarding the validity regime in §III. We address the comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§III] §III (Coherent dynamics): the effective interaction Hamiltonian is derived via adiabatic elimination or similar; the central claim that this generates entanglement would be strengthened by an explicit statement of the validity regime (e.g., detuning and coupling-strength inequalities) that keeps the mechanical oscillators in the desired subspace.

    Authors: We agree that explicitly stating the validity conditions strengthens the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in §III specifying the regime of the adiabatic elimination: the detuning Δ of the Rydberg transition must satisfy Δ ≫ g (where g is the oscillator-atom coupling) and Δ ≫ γ (radiative decay rate), together with the requirement that the mechanical frequencies remain well below the effective interaction strength. These inequalities ensure negligible population of the intermediate Rydberg states and confine the dynamics to the desired mechanical subspace. We will also include a brief numerical check confirming that the entanglement generation persists under these conditions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper is a theoretical proposal deriving an effective interaction between mechanical oscillators mediated by a Rydberg atom chain, showing coherent and dissipative entanglement via standard Hamiltonian and master-equation modeling. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; assumptions about Rydberg coherence are stated explicitly as requirements rather than smuggled in. The central claims follow from the modeled dynamics under conventional quantum-optics assumptions and remain independent of the target results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard open quantum system assumptions and experimental feasibility of Rydberg tweezers; no new entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The combined atom-oscillator system can be modeled with coherent Hamiltonian dynamics plus tunable dissipative channels from Rydberg decay.
    Invoked to enable both coherent and dissipative entanglement generation as stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5650 in / 1225 out tokens · 36523 ms · 2026-05-18T09:10:42.297651+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The first line describes a direct oscillator–oscillator coupling that generates en- tanglement, where the sign of the coupling depends on the state of the chain

    Expressing the chain Hamiltonian (2) in its eigenbasis and employ- ing a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation [38, 39], we obtain the effective Hamiltonian Heff =−J2 V (a†b+ab †)(∣↓↓⟩⟨↓↓∣+∣↑↑⟩⟨↑↑∣−∣S⟩⟨S∣−∣T⟩⟨T∣) −J2 V [(a†2 +b †2 )∣↓↓⟩⟨↑↑∣+(a2+b 2)∣↑↑⟩⟨↓↓∣] +(V+ J2M V )(∣T⟩⟨T∣−∣S⟩⟨S∣)+Mω.(6) Here, the third line represents the energy of the basis states of the...

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Aspect, J

    A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger, Experimental Test of Bell’s Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyz- ers, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 1804 (1982)

    work page 1982

  3. [3]

    Wang, L.-K

    X.-L. Wang, L.-K. Chen, W. Li, H.-L. Huang, C. Liu, C. Chen, Y.-H. Luo, Z.-E. Su, D. Wu, Z.-D. Li, H. Lu, Y. Hu, X. Jiang, C.-Z. Peng, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, Y.-A. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Experimental Ten-Photon En- tanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 210502 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    A. Kam, S. Tsesses, Y. Ilin, K. Cohen, Y. Lumer, L. Frid- man, S. Lotan, A. Patsyk, L. Nemirovsky-Levy, M. Oren- stein, M. Segev, and G. Bartal, Near-field photon entan- glement in total angular momentum, Nature640, 634 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    van Leent, M

    T. van Leent, M. Bock, F. Fertig, R. Garthoff, S. Eppelt, Y. Zhou, P. Malik, M. Seubert, T. Bauer, W. Rosen- feld, W. Zhang, C. Becher, and H. Weinfurter, Entan- gling single atoms over 33 km telecom fibre, Nature607, 69 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    S. Saha, M. Shalaev, J. O’Reilly, I. Goetting, G. Toh, A. Kalakuntla, Y. Yu, and C. Monroe, High-fidelity re- mote entanglement of trapped atoms mediated by time- bin photons, Nat. Commun.16, 2533 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    J. D. Jost, J. P. Home, J. M. Amini, D. Hanneke, R. Oz- eri, C. Langer, J. J. Bollinger, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland, Entangled mechanical oscillators, Nature459, 683 (2009)

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Krutyanskiy, M

    V. Krutyanskiy, M. Galli, V. Krcmarsky, S. Baier, D. A. Fioretto, Y. Pu, A. Mazloom, P. Sekatski, M. Canteri, M. Teller, J. Schupp, J. Bate, M. Meraner, N. San- gouard, B. P. Lanyon, and T. E. Northup, Entanglement of Trapped-Ion Qubits Separated by 230 Meters, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 050803 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    W. H. Zurek, Decoherence, einselection, and the quan- tum origins of the classical, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 715 (2003)

    work page 2003

  10. [10]

    Schlosshauer, Quantum decoherence, Phys

    M. Schlosshauer, Quantum decoherence, Phys. Rep.831, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    X. Liu, J. F. Vignola, H. J. Simpson, B. R. Lemon, B. H. Houston, and D. M. Photiadis, A loss mechanism study of a very high Q silicon micromechanical oscillator, J. Appl. Phys.97, 023524 (2004)

    work page 2004

  13. [13]

    Belli, R

    S. Belli, R. Bonsignori, G. D’Auria, L. Fant, M. Mar- tini, S. Peirone, S. Donadi, and A. Bassi, Entangling macroscopic diamonds at room temperature: Bounds on the continuous-spontaneous-localization parameters, Phys. Rev. A94, 012108 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    M. Bild, M. Fadel, Y. Yang, U. von L¨ upke, P. Mar- tin, A. Bruno, and Y. Chu, Schr¨ odinger cat states of a 16-microgram mechanical oscillator, Science380, 274 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    W. H. Renninger, P. Kharel, R. O. Behunin, and P. T. Rakich, Bulk crystalline optomechanics, Nat. Phys.14, 601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Chu and S

    Y. Chu and S. Gr¨ oblacher, A perspective on hybrid quan- tum opto- and electromechanical systems, App. Phys. Lett.117, 150503 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Chegnizadeh, M

    M. Chegnizadeh, M. Scigliuzzo, A. Youssefi, S. Kono, E. Guzovskii, and T. J. Kippenberg, Quantum collec- tive motion of macroscopic mechanical oscillators, Sci- ence386, 1383 (2024). 8

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Q. R. Rahman, I. Kladari´ c, M.-E. Kern, L. Lachman, Y. Chu, R. Filip, and M. Fadel, Genuine Quantum Non- Gaussianity and Metrological Sensitivity of Fock States Prepared in a Mechanical Resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 180801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    S. Bose, I. Fuentes, A. A. Geraci, S. M. Khan, S. Qvar- fort, M. Rademacher, M. Rashid, M. Toroˇ s, H. Ulbricht, and C. C. Wanjura, Massive quantum systems as inter- faces of quantum mechanics and gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 015003 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Anastopoulos and B.-L

    C. Anastopoulos and B.-L. Hu, Gravitational decoher- ence: A thematic overview, AVS Quantum Sci.4, 015602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, M. Schut, and M. Toroˇ s, En- tanglement Witness for the Weak Equivalence Principle, Entropy25, 448 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, E. Damsk¨ agg, J.-M. Pirkkalainen, M. Asjad, A. A. Clerk, F. Massel, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Stabilized entangle- ment of massive mechanical oscillators, Nature556, 478 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Riedinger, A

    R. Riedinger, A. Wallucks, I. Marinkovi´ c, C. L¨ oschnauer, M. Aspelmeyer, S. Hong, and S. Gr¨ oblacher, Remote quantum entanglement between two micromechanical os- cillators, Nature556, 473 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Mercier de L´ epinay, C

    L. Mercier de L´ epinay, C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Quantum mechanics–free subsystem with mechanical oscillators, Science372, 625 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    M.-H. Chou, H. Qiao, H. Yan, G. Andersson, C. R. Con- ner, J. Grebel, Y. J. Joshi, J. M. Miller, R. G. Povey, X. Wu, and A. N. Cleland, Deterministic multi-phonon entanglement between two mechanical resonators on sep- arate substrates, Nat. Commun.16, 1450 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Y. Yang, I. Kladari´ c, M. Drimmer, U. von L¨ upke, D. Lenterman, J. Bus, S. Marti, M. Fadel, and Y. Chu, A mechanical qubit, Science386, 783 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    V. J. Gokhale, B. P. Downey, D. S. Katzer, N. Nepal, A. C. Lang, R. M. Stroud, and D. J. Meyer, Epi- taxial bulk acoustic wave resonators as highly coher- ent multi-phonon sources for quantum acoustodynamics, Nat. Commun.11, 2314 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, V

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. We- ber, N. Lang, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms, Science365, 775 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kali- nowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. Sales Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Barredo, H

    D. Barredo, H. Labuhn, S. Ravets, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, and C. S. Adams, Coherent Excitation Transfer in a Spin Chain of Three Rydberg Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 113002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Stevenson, J

    R. Stevenson, J. Min´ aˇ r, S. Hofferberth, and I. Lesanovsky, Prospects of charged-oscillator quantum- state generation with Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A94, 043813 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Gao, Y.-x

    M. Gao, Y.-x. Liu, and X.-B. Wang, Coupling Rydberg atoms to superconducting qubits via nanomechanical res- onator, Phys. Rev. A83, 022309 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    B´ egoc, G

    B. B´ egoc, G. Cichelli, S. P. Singh, F. Bensch, V. Amico, F. Perciavalle, D. Rossini, L. Amico, and O. Morsch, Con- trolled dissipation for Rydberg atom experiments, Phys. Rev. A112, 023312 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Schempp, G

    H. Schempp, G. G¨ unter, S. W¨ uster, M. Weidem¨ uller, and S. Whitlock, Correlated Exciton Transport in Rydberg- Dressed-Atom Spin Chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 093002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    Whitlock, H

    S. Whitlock, H. Wildhagen, H. Weimer, and M. Wei- dem¨ uller, Diffusive to Nonergodic Dipolar Transport in a Dissipative Atomic Medium, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 213606 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Vidal and R

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Computable measure of en- tanglement, Phys. Rev. A65, 032314 (2002)

    work page 2002

  37. [37]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    Coleman,Introduction to Many Body Physics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008)

    P. Coleman,Introduction to Many Body Physics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008)

    work page 2008

  39. [39]

    J. R. Schrieffer and P. A. Wolff, Relation between the Anderson and Kondo Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev.149, 491 (1966)

    work page 1966

  40. [40]

    G. T. Landi, Eigenoperator approach to Schrieffer-Wolff perturbation theory and dispersive interactions (2024), arXiv:2409.10656 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Dalibard, Y

    J. Dalibard, Y. Castin, and K. Mølmer, Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 580 (1992)

    work page 1992

  42. [42]

    M. B. Plenio and P. L. Knight, The quantum-jump ap- proach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 101 (1998)

    work page 1998

  43. [43]

    A. M. Falconi, R. Panza, S. Sbernardori, R. Forti, R. Klemt, O. A. Karim, M. Marinelli, and F. Scazza, Microsecond-scale high-survival and number- resolved detection of ytterbium atom arrays (2025), arXiv:2507.01011 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Gammelmark, B

    S. Gammelmark, B. Julsgaard, and K. Mølmer, Past quantum states of a monitored system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 160401 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity parallel entan- gling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature 622, 268 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Scholl, H

    P. Scholl, H. J. Williams, G. Bornet, F. Wallner, D. Barredo, L. Henriet, A. Signoles, C. Hainaut, T. Franz, S. Geier, A. Tebben, A. Salzinger, G. Z¨ urn, T. Lahaye, M. Weidem¨ uller, and A. Browaeys, Microwave Engineering of ProgrammableXXZHamiltonians in Ar- rays of Rydberg Atoms, PRX Quantum3, 020303 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    A. D. O’Connell, M. Hofheinz, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bial- czak, M. Lenander, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, D. Sank, H. Wang, M. Weides, J. Wenner, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator, Nature464, 697 (2010)

    work page 2010

  48. [48]

    Y. Chu, P. Kharel, W. H. Renninger, L. D. Burkhart, L. Frunzio, P. T. Rakich, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Quantum acoustics with superconducting qubits, Science358, 199 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    Han, C.-L

    X. Han, C.-L. Zou, and H. X. Tang, Multimode Strong Coupling in Superconducting Cavity Piezoelectrome- 9 chanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 123603 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Y. Luo, H. H. Diamandi, H. Li, R. Bi, D. Mason, T. Yoon, X. Guo, H. Tang, R. O. Behunin, F. J. Walker, C. Ahn, and P. T. Rakich, Lifetime-limited Gigahertz- frequency Mechanical Oscillators with Millisecond Co- herence Times (2025), arXiv:2504.07523 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    von L¨ upke, I

    U. von L¨ upke, I. C. Rodrigues, Y. Yang, M. Fadel, and Y. Chu, Engineering multimode interactions in circuit quantum acoustodynamics, Nat. Phys.20, 564 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    ˇSibali´ c, J

    N. ˇSibali´ c, J. Pritchard, C. Adams, and K. Weatherill, ARC: An open-source library for calculating properties of alkali Rydberg atoms, Comput. Phys. Commun.220, 319 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    von L¨ upke,Quantum Control of a Multimode Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator, Doctoral Thesis, ETH Zurich (2023)

    U. von L¨ upke,Quantum Control of a Multimode Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonator, Doctoral Thesis, ETH Zurich (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Pobell,Matter and Methods at Low Temperatures (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007)

    F. Pobell,Matter and Methods at Low Temperatures (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007)

    work page 2007