pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.10906 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Possible Spatial Correlation of Superconducting and Pseudogap Dynamics in a Bi-based Cuprate

T. Shimizu , T. Kurosawa , S. Tsuchiya , R. Tobise , K. Yamane , R. Morita , M. Oda , Y. Toda This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 08:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords cuprate superconductorspseudogap phaseultrafast spectroscopyspatial correlationtransient reflectivityBi2201high-temperature superconductivity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spatial variations in the threshold fluences for superconductivity and the pseudogap track each other locally in a Bi-based cuprate.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper seeks to establish a local connection between superconductivity and the pseudogap phase in high-temperature cuprate superconductors. The authors use ultrafast optical pulses with spatial resolution to measure how much light energy is needed to wipe out each state in different parts of the sample. They find that while the pseudogap response varies more across the material, the critical energy levels for both states change in tandem on the micrometer scale. This tracking suggests the two phenomena are not separate but linked at a local level inside the material. Confirming such a correlation would help refine models of what drives superconductivity above liquid nitrogen temperatures.

Core claim

In optimally doped La-Bi2201, spatially resolved transient reflectivity measurements show that micrometer-scale contrasts arise from local variations in the threshold fluence to disrupt the superconducting or pseudogap state. The superconducting response is spatially uniform while the pseudogap is inhomogeneous, yet their threshold fluences closely track each other, providing direct spatial evidence of a robust local correlation between the two states.

What carries the argument

Spatially and temporally resolved measurements of photoinduced quasiparticle dynamics that map local threshold fluences for state disruption.

If this is right

  • The superconducting response remains spatially uniform across the sample.
  • The pseudogap state exhibits intrinsic spatial inhomogeneity.
  • This ultrafast optical approach offers a bulk-sensitive way to visualize hidden spatial correlations in correlated electron materials.
  • These findings supply new benchmarks for theories of intertwined phases in cuprates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the correlation is fundamental, similar spatial tracking should appear in other cuprate families or doping levels.
  • The method could extend to probe correlations with other orders like charge density waves in related materials.
  • Combining these optical maps with local probes such as scanning tunneling microscopy might reveal the microscopic origin of the shared thresholds.

Load-bearing premise

The micrometer-scale spatial contrasts in transient reflectivity come from real local differences in the threshold fluences needed to disrupt the states, not from sample inhomogeneities or experimental artifacts.

What would settle it

If independent measurements on the same sample or similar materials showed that the spatial maps of superconducting and pseudogap threshold fluences do not match or are dominated by defects, the claim of local intrinsic correlation would be challenged.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.10906 by K. Yamane, M. Oda, R. Morita, R. Tobise, S. Tsuchiya, T. Kurosawa, T. Shimizu, Y. Toda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Optical microscope image of the sample surface. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) confirms that the SC response remains nearly uniform at this fluence. As the fluence increases, how￾ever, micron-scale spatial modulation becomes apparent. In contrast, the spatial modulation of APG is already ev￾ident even under weak excitation conditions in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spatial distributions of the phase destruction thre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding the interplay between superconductivity and the pseudogap phase is essential for elucidating the mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity in cuprates. Here we provide direct spatial evidence that these two states are locally and intrinsically correlated. Using spatially and temporally resolved measurements of photoinduced quasiparticle dynamics in optimally doped Bi$_2$Sr$_{1.7}$La$_{0.3}$CuO$_{6+\delta}$ (La-Bi2201), we reveal micrometer-scale spatial contrasts in the transient reflectivity that arise from local variations in the threshold fluence required to disrupt either the superconducting or pseudogap state. The superconducting response remains spatially uniform, whereas the pseudogap exhibits intrinsic inhomogeneity, yet the spatial variations of their threshold fluences closely track each other, establishing a robust local correlation between the two. These results introduce a bulk-sensitive ultrafast optical methodology for visualizing hidden spatial correlations in correlated materials and provide new benchmarks for understanding the intertwined phases in cuprates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports spatially and temporally resolved transient reflectivity measurements on optimally doped La-Bi2201, identifying micrometer-scale spatial contrasts arising from local variations in the threshold fluence needed to disrupt the superconducting or pseudogap state. The superconducting response is described as spatially uniform while the pseudogap is inhomogeneous, yet the spatial variations of the two threshold fluences are reported to track each other closely, supporting a claim of robust local intrinsic correlation between the phases.

Significance. If the correlation is shown to be intrinsic rather than an artifact of common-mode optical inhomogeneities, the work would introduce a bulk-sensitive ultrafast optical method for visualizing spatial correlations in correlated materials and supply new experimental constraints on the interplay of superconductivity and pseudogap in cuprates.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results and Methods sections describing fluence-dependent data and threshold extraction] The central claim that micrometer-scale contrasts in transient reflectivity map directly to intrinsic local differences in threshold fluence (rather than to position-dependent factors such as local absorption, scattering, or residual strain that affect both channels similarly) is load-bearing. The fluence-extraction procedure—whether based on amplitude saturation or recovery-time changes—must be shown, with explicit controls or modeling, to isolate order-parameter suppression thresholds from these confounders. This concern is not resolved by the abstract's statement that SC is uniform while PG is inhomogeneous.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract lacks quantitative support (e.g., correlation coefficients between the two threshold maps, typical fluence values with uncertainties, or spatial resolution details). Adding these would strengthen the presentation without altering the central claim.
  2. [Figures showing spatial maps] Ensure spatial maps include scale bars, error estimates on extracted thresholds, and clear indication of how many independent positions or samples were measured.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the importance of rigorously excluding potential artifacts in the interpretation of the spatial threshold maps. We address the major comment below and describe the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results and Methods sections describing fluence-dependent data and threshold extraction] The central claim that micrometer-scale contrasts in transient reflectivity map directly to intrinsic local differences in threshold fluence (rather than to position-dependent factors such as local absorption, scattering, or residual strain that affect both channels similarly) is load-bearing. The fluence-extraction procedure—whether based on amplitude saturation or recovery-time changes—must be shown, with explicit controls or modeling, to isolate order-parameter suppression thresholds from these confounders. This concern is not resolved by the abstract's statement that SC is uniform while PG is inhomogeneous.

    Authors: We agree that demonstrating the intrinsic character of the observed correlation requires explicit separation from common-mode optical or strain effects. The manuscript already notes that the superconducting threshold remains spatially uniform while the pseudogap threshold is inhomogeneous, and that the two maps nevertheless track each other closely; a purely common-mode artifact would be expected to modulate both channels similarly and would not produce this differential spatial structure. Nevertheless, to strengthen the argument we will expand the Methods and Results sections with (i) a quantitative model of how local absorption or scattering variations would propagate into the extracted thresholds and (ii) additional controls comparing the spatial maps against independent characterizations of local sample properties. These additions will be included in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: experimental correlation from direct measurements

full rationale

The paper reports results from spatially and temporally resolved transient reflectivity measurements on La-Bi2201, claiming that micrometer-scale spatial contrasts arise from local variations in threshold fluences for disrupting SC or PG states, with their variations tracking each other. This central claim rests on direct experimental data contrasts rather than any derivation chain, equations, or first-principles steps. No self-definitional relations, fitted inputs presented as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided abstract or description; the methodology is described as bulk-sensitive ultrafast optical visualization without reduction to prior inputs by construction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks of measured optical dynamics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

With only the abstract available, no explicit free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are identifiable; the work rests on standard domain assumptions of ultrafast spectroscopy in cuprates.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Transient reflectivity changes can be interpreted as signatures of quasiparticle dynamics that distinguish superconducting and pseudogap states.
    The paper invokes established interpretations from prior ultrafast studies on cuprates to link reflectivity contrasts to the two phases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5729 in / 1265 out tokens · 35768 ms · 2026-05-18T08:17:42.862938+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1.1 (10 −4)∆R/R d e 50 µm 1.4 2.7 (10 −4)∆R/R 0.1 0.7 (10 −4)∆R/R 40 20 0 20 40 − − Position X ( µm) 40 20 0 20 40 − −Position Y ( µm) tPpr (ps ) −1 0. 1. 2. 10. 100. c PA PBPAPB T =10 K, tPpr =3.0 ps F= 0.6 µJ/cm 2 T =10 K, tPpr =3.0 ps F= 6.0 µJ/cm 2 T =50 K, tPpr =0.4 ps F= 6.2 µJ/cm 2 FIG. 1. (a) Optical microscope image of the sample surface. The red...

    work page

  2. [2]

    APG 10 4 PA PB F cm 2µJ

    work page

  3. [3]

    5 10 15 0. 1. 2. ASC 10 4 PA PB F cm 2µJ 20 25 FIG. 3. Fluence dependence of the transient reflectivity am- plitudes for (a) SC ( ASC) and (b) PG ( APG) responses. The amplitudes ASC and APG, extracted from the ∆ R/R signals at the positions P A and P B in Fig. 1(a), are shown. Dashed (PA) and solid (P B) lines in each panel represent fits based on the finit...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Timusk and B

    T. Timusk and B. Statt, Reports on Progress in Physics 62, 61 (1999), URL https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0034-4885/62/1/002

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    M. R. Norman, M. Randeria, H. Ding, and J. C. Cam- puzano, Phys. Rev. B 57, R11093 (1998), URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.R11093

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.57.r11093 1998

  6. [6]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, Nature 518, 179 (2015), URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/nature14165

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14165 2015

  7. [7]

    Hashimoto, I

    M. Hashimoto, I. M. Vishik, R.-H. He, T. P. Devereaux, and Z.-X. Shen, Nature Physics 10, 483 (2014), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3009

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3009 2014

  8. [8]

    Tanaka, W

    K. Tanaka, W. S. Lee, D. H. Lu, A. Fujimori, T. Fujii, null, I. Terasaki, D. J. Scalapino, T. P. Devereaux, Z. Hussain, et al., Science 314, 1910 (2006), URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10. 1126/science.1133411

    work page 1910

  9. [9]

    J. Lee, K. Fujita, K. McElroy, J. Slezak, M. Wang, Y. Aiura, H. Bando, M. Ishikado, T. Masui, J.-X. Zhu, et al., Nature 442, 546 (2006), URL https://www. nature.com/articles/nature04973

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Kondo, T

    T. Kondo, T. Takeuchi, A. Kaminski, S. Tsuda, and S. Shin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 267004 (2007)

    work page 2007

  11. [11]

    Okada, T

    Y. Okada, T. Takeuchi, A. Shimoyamada, S. Shin, and H. Ikuta, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 69, 2989 (2008)

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    K. K. Gomes, A. N. Pasupathy, A. Pushp, S. Ono, Y. Ando, and A. Yazdani, Nature 447, 569 (2007), URL 6 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05881

    work page doi:10.1038/nature05881 2007

  13. [13]

    Vershinin, S

    M. Vershinin, S. Misra, S. Ono, Y. Abe, Y. Ando, and A. Yazdani, Science 303, 1995 (2004), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1093384, URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/ science.1093384

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1093384 1995

  14. [14]

    Kohsaka, C

    Y. Kohsaka, C. Taylor, P. Wahl, A. Schmidt, J. Lee, K. Fujita, J. Alldredge, K. McElroy, J. Lee, H. Eisaki, et al., Nature 454, 1072 (2008), URL https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nature07243

    work page doi:10.1038/nature07243 2008

  15. [15]

    Ideta, K

    S. Ideta, K. Takashima, M. Hashimoto, T. Yoshida, A. Fujimori, H. Anzai, T. Fujita, Y. Nakashima, A. Ino, M. Arita, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 227001 (2010), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.104.227001

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    Tajima, Y

    S. Tajima, Y. Itoh, K. Mizutamari, S. Miyasaka, M. Nakajima, N. Sasaki, S. Yamaguchi, K.- i. Harada, and T. Watanabe, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 93, 103701 (2024), https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.93.103701, URL https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.93.103701

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.93.103701 2024

  17. [17]

    J. Niu, M. O. Larrazabal, T. Gozlinski, Y. Sato, K. M. Bastiaans, T. Benschop, J.-F. Ge, Y. M. Blanter, G. Gu, I. Swart, et al. (2024), 2409.15928, URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2409.15928

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    S. Ye, C. Zou, H. Yan, Y. Ji, M. Xu, Z. Dong, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, and Y. Wang, Nature Physics 19, 1301 (2023), URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-02100-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02100-9 2023

  19. [19]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Ger- ber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041002 (2021), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/RevModPhys.93.041002

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.041002 2021

  20. [20]

    Demsar, B

    J. Demsar, B. Podobnik, V. V. Kabanov, T. Wolf, and D. Mihailovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4918 (1999), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82. 4918

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82 1999

  21. [21]

    R. A. Kaindl, M. Woerner, T. Elsaesser, D. C. Smith, J. F. Ryan, G. A. Farnan, M. P. Mc- Curry, and D. G. Walmsley, Science 287, 470 (2000), URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10. 1126/science.287.5452.470

    work page 2000

  22. [22]

    C. W. Luo, C. C. Hsieh, Y.-J. Chen, P. T. Shih, M. H. Chen, K. H. Wu, J. Y. Juang, J.-Y. Lin, T. M. Uen, and Y. S. Gou, Phys. Rev. B 74, 184525 (2006), URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.184525

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.184525 2006

  23. [23]

    Y. Toda, T. Mertelj, P. Kusar, T. Kurosawa, M. Oda, M. Ido, and D. Mihailovic, Physical Review B 84, 174516 (2011)

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    Coslovich, C

    G. Coslovich, C. Giannetti, F. Cilento, S. Dal Conte, T. Abebaw, D. Bossini, G. Ferrini, H. Eisaki, M. Greven, A. Damascelli, et al., Physical Review Letters 110, 107003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Akiba, Y

    T. Akiba, Y. Toda, S. Tsuchiya, M. Oda, T. Kuro- sawa, D. Mihailovic, and T. Mertelj, Phys. Rev. B 109, 014503 (2024), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.014503

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.014503 2024

  26. [26]

    Eisaki, N

    H. Eisaki, N. Kaneko, D. L. Feng, A. Damascelli, P. K. Mang, K. M. Shen, Z.-X. Shen, and M. Greven, Phys. Rev. B 69, 064512 (2004), URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.064512

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.064512 2004

  27. [27]

    Kurosawa, T

    T. Kurosawa, T. Yoneyama, Y. Takano, M. Hagiwara, R. Inoue, N. Hagiwara, K. Kurusu, K. Takeyama, N. Momono, M. Oda, et al., Phys. Rev. B 81, 094519 (2010), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.81.094519

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Kurosawa, K

    T. Kurosawa, K. Takeyama, S. Baar, Y. Shibata, M. Kataoka, S. Mizuta, H. Yoshida, N. Momono, M. Oda, and M. Ido, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 85, 044709 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Dvorsek, V

    D. Dvorsek, V. V. Kabanov, J. Demsar, S. M. Kaza- kov, J. Karpinski, and D. Mihailovic, Phys. Rev. B 66, 020510 (2002), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.020510

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.020510 2002

  30. [30]

    G. P. Segre, N. Gedik, J. Orenstein, D. A. Bonn, R. Liang, and W. N. Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 137001 (2002), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.88.137001

    work page 2002

  31. [31]

    Kusar, J

    P. Kusar, J. Demsar, D. Mihailovic, and S. Sugai, Phys. Rev. B 72, 014544 (2005), URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.014544

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.014544 2005

  32. [32]

    Y. Toda, S. Tsuchiya, M. Oda, T. Kurosawa, S. Kat- sumata, M. Naseska, T. Mertelj, and D. Mihailovic, Phys. Rev. B 104, 094507 (2021), URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.094507

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.094507 2021

  33. [33]

    1 were chosen for visual clarity, while Fig

    Note1, representative fluences in Fig. 1 were chosen for visual clarity, while Fig. 2 shows the systematic set used for quantitative analysis

    work page

  34. [34]

    Kusar, V

    P. Kusar, V. V. Kabanov, S. Sugai, J. Demsar, T. Mertelj, and D. Mihailovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 227001 (2008), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.101.227001

    work page 2008

  35. [35]

    Naseska, A

    M. Naseska, A. Pogrebna, G. Cao, Z. A. Xu, D. Mihailovic, and T. Mertelj, Phys. Rev. B 98, 035148 (2018), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.98.035148

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Mertelj, V

    T. Mertelj, V. V. Kabanov, C. Gadermaier, N. D. Zhi- gadlo, S. Katrych, J. Karpinski, and D. Mihailovic, Phys- ical Review Letters 102, 117002 (2009), ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114, URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.102.117002

    work page 2009

  37. [37]

    V. V. Kabanov, J. Demsar, B. Podobnik, and D. Mi- hailovic, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1497 (1999), URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1497

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1497 1999

  38. [38]

    Stojchevska, P

    L. Stojchevska, P. Kusar, T. Mertelj, V. V. Kabanov, Y. Toda, X. Yao, and D. Mihailovic, Phys. Rev. B 84, 180507 (2011), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.180507

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.84.180507 2011

  39. [39]

    Madan, T

    I. Madan, T. Kurosawa, Y. Toda, M. Oda, T. Mertelj, and D. Mihailovic, Nature Communications 6, 1 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Kondo, R

    T. Kondo, R. Khasanov, T. Takeuchi, J. Schmalian, and A. Kaminski, Nature 457, 296 (2009), URL https:// doi.org/10.1038/nature07644

    work page doi:10.1038/nature07644 2009

  41. [41]

    Okada, T

    Y. Okada, T. Kawaguchi, M. Ohkawa, K. Ishizaka, T. Takeuchi, S. Shin, and H. Ikuta, Phys. Rev. B 83, 104502 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    Arpaia and G

    R. Arpaia and G. Ghiringhelli, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 90, 111005 (2021), URL https://doi. org/10.7566/JPSJ.90.111005

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.90.111005 2021