arxiv: 2510.11030 · v3 · submitted 2025-10-13 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · hep-ph

Resonant W and Z Boson Production in FSRQ Jets: Implications for Diffuse Neutrino Fluxes

Ji-Hoon Ha , Ibragim Alikhanov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 08:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE hep-ph

keywords FSRQsblazarsneutrino fluxZ bosonsW bosonsdiffuse neutrinos3C 279electroweak processes

0 comments

The pith

Resonant Z boson production in FSRQ jets produces neutrino flux many orders of magnitude below the diffuse astrophysical background.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the rate at which electrons and positrons in FSRQ jets annihilate to produce W and Z bosons. It then scales this up to the full population of such quasars using their observed luminosity function and how their numbers change with distance. The resulting neutrino output from these processes peaks when the universe was about half its current age but still falls far short of explaining the neutrinos seen by IceCube and similar detectors. This matters because it shows that even in the most extreme known particle accelerators, standard model interactions alone cannot account for the high-energy neutrino sky.

Core claim

By modeling the electron distribution in the jet of the FSRQ 3C 279 during a flaring state and incorporating the FSRQ luminosity function and redshift evolution, the differential flux contribution from Z boson production exhibits a pronounced peak at redshift z ∼ 1, yet the flux from Z boson production within the jet blob is many orders of magnitude smaller than the total diffuse astrophysical neutrino flux.

What carries the argument

Resonant electron-positron annihilation to W and Z bosons in the relativistic jet blob of FSRQs, which sets the production rate leading to neutrino emission.

If this is right

The contribution of these electroweak processes in FSRQ jets to the diffuse neutrino flux is negligible.
Neutrino observatories such as IceCube cannot detect this component from FSRQs.
The flux peaks at redshift z ~ 1 due to the redshift evolution of the FSRQ population.
Even rare high-energy interactions in blazar jets leave only a subtle imprint on the neutrino background.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the flaring state of 3C 279 does not represent typical conditions across other FSRQs, the estimated flux could shift by orders of magnitude.
This calculation supplies a baseline that models adding non-standard processes in blazar jets must respect.
Similar resonant production could be examined in other high-energy environments such as gamma-ray bursts to compare contributions.

Load-bearing premise

The electron energy distribution inside the jet of 3C 279 during its flaring state can be reliably extrapolated to the full cosmological population of FSRQs when combined with the adopted luminosity function and redshift evolution.

What would settle it

A measurement showing a diffuse neutrino component at energies characteristic of Z boson decay that significantly exceeds the calculated FSRQ contribution would indicate the production rate or population scaling is underestimated.

read the original abstract

Blazars, particularly Flat Spectrum Radio Quasars (FSRQs), are well-known for their ability to accelerate a substantial population of electrons and positrons, as inferred from multiwavelength radiation observations. Therefore, these astrophysical objects are promising candidates for studying high-energy electron--positron interactions, such as the production of $W^{\pm}$ and $Z$ bosons. In this work, we explore the implications of electron--positron annihilation processes in the jet environments of FSRQs, focusing on the resonant production of electroweak bosons and their potential contribution to the diffuse neutrino flux. By modeling the electron distribution in the jet of the FSRQ 3C~279 during a flaring state, we calculate the reaction rates for $W^{\pm}$ and $Z$ bosons and estimate the resulting diffuse fluxes from the cosmological population of FSRQs. We incorporate the FSRQ luminosity function and its redshift evolution to account for the population distribution across cosmic time, finding that the differential flux contribution exhibits a pronounced peak at redshift $z \sim 1$. While the expected fluxes remain well below the detection thresholds of current neutrino observatories such as IceCube, KM3NeT, or Baikal-GVD, the flux from $Z$ boson production within the jet blob is many orders of magnitude smaller than the total diffuse astrophysical neutrino flux. These results provide a theoretical benchmark for the role of Standard Model electroweak processes in extreme astrophysical environments, highlighting the interplay between particle physics and astrophysics, and illustrating that even extremely rare high-energy interactions can leave a subtle, theoretically meaningful imprint on the diffuse astrophysical neutrino background.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper computes resonant W/Z production rates from the 3C 279 flare spectrum, integrates them over the FSRQ luminosity function, and finds a negligible contribution to the diffuse neutrino flux with a peak at z~1, but the extrapolation step carries the main uncertainty.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this calculation shows resonant electroweak boson production inside FSRQ jets adds essentially nothing to the observed diffuse neutrino background. The Z channel comes out many orders of magnitude below the total flux, and even the W channel stays well under current detector thresholds after folding in the population model. That is the concrete result they report. The work is new in the sense that it performs this specific integration of resonant rates over the cosmological FSRQ distribution and quotes a redshift peak and magnitude comparison that is not in the earlier literature they cite. It does the straightforward thing of taking an observed flare spectrum, computing the annihilation rates, and propagating through a standard luminosity function with redshift evolution. That is useful as a benchmark to have written down, confirming that these Standard Model processes are not competitive with other neutrino production channels in blazars. The approach is direct and avoids obvious circularity since it starts from flare data and published population parameters rather than fitting to the neutrino flux itself. The soft spot is the extrapolation from the flaring state of one source to the full population. Resonant production is exponentially sensitive to the high-energy tail of the electron distribution, so modest differences in power-law index or cutoff between flare and average states can shift the integrated flux by large factors. The abstract does not show the equations or any error budget on the electron parameters, which makes it hard to judge how robust the orders-of-magnitude suppression really is. If the full text includes a clear propagation of those uncertainties, the concern shrinks; otherwise it remains the load-bearing assumption. This paper is for people who model neutrino production in jets and want a reference number for this particular channel. It is narrow but self-contained, so a serious referee could check the rate calculation and the population integration without needing major new data. I would send it to peer review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript models resonant W± and Z boson production via e+e− annihilation in FSRQ jets, taking the electron distribution from the 3C 279 flare as input. It integrates the resulting reaction rates over an adopted FSRQ luminosity function and redshift evolution to compute the diffuse neutrino flux, reporting a peak contribution near z ≈ 1. The central result is that both channels produce fluxes well below current IceCube/KM3NeT sensitivities, with the Z channel suppressed by many orders of magnitude relative to the observed astrophysical neutrino background.

Significance. If the modeling is robust, the work supplies a quantitative benchmark demonstrating that Standard Model electroweak resonances in blazar jets are negligible contributors to the diffuse neutrino flux. This helps isolate the dominant production channels and illustrates the interplay between particle-physics cross sections and astrophysical source populations.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (electron distribution and reaction-rate calculation): The claim that the Z-boson flux is many orders of magnitude below the total diffuse neutrino flux rests on scaling the high-energy tail of the 3C 279 flare spectrum (after luminosity rescaling) to the full cosmological FSRQ population. Because the resonant cross section is exponentially sensitive to Lorentz factors ≳ 10^4–10^5, even modest changes in the power-law index or cutoff would alter the integrated flux by orders of magnitude; no sensitivity study or justification for this extrapolation is provided.
[§4] §4 (population integration and flux results): The statement that the fluxes remain well below detection thresholds lacks an explicit error budget or direct overlay against IceCube diffuse-flux measurements. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the “well below” conclusion is robust to plausible variations in the luminosity-function parameters or redshift evolution.

minor comments (2)

[§2] The notation distinguishing the flare-specific electron distribution from the population-averaged one is introduced without a clear summary table or equation reference, making it difficult to follow the scaling steps.
[Results] Figure 3 (or equivalent redshift-distribution plot) would benefit from an additional panel or inset showing the contribution from the W versus Z channels separately to illustrate the stated orders-of-magnitude difference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript concerning resonant W and Z boson production in FSRQ jets. We address the major comments below and outline the revisions we plan to make to improve the robustness and clarity of our results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (electron distribution and reaction-rate calculation): The claim that the Z-boson flux is many orders of magnitude below the total diffuse neutrino flux rests on scaling the high-energy tail of the 3C 279 flare spectrum (after luminosity rescaling) to the full cosmological FSRQ population. Because the resonant cross section is exponentially sensitive to Lorentz factors ≳ 10^4–10^5, even modest changes in the power-law index or cutoff would alter the integrated flux by orders of magnitude; no sensitivity study or justification for this extrapolation is provided.

Authors: We agree that the high-energy tail of the electron distribution is critical due to the exponential sensitivity of the resonant cross section. The electron spectrum used is directly inferred from the multi-wavelength observations of the 3C 279 flare, with the power-law index and cutoff determined by fitting the synchrotron and Compton components. To strengthen this aspect, we will add a dedicated sensitivity analysis in the revised manuscript, varying the spectral index by ±0.2 and the cutoff Lorentz factor within the range allowed by the flare data. This will show that while the absolute flux can vary, the conclusion that it is many orders of magnitude below the observed diffuse flux holds. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4 (population integration and flux results): The statement that the fluxes remain well below detection thresholds lacks an explicit error budget or direct overlay against IceCube diffuse-flux measurements. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the “well below” conclusion is robust to plausible variations in the luminosity-function parameters or redshift evolution.

Authors: We acknowledge the need for a more quantitative presentation of uncertainties. In the revised manuscript, we will include an explicit discussion of the uncertainties arising from the adopted FSRQ luminosity function and its redshift evolution, drawing from the range of parameters in the literature. Additionally, we will add a figure that directly compares our computed differential neutrino flux to the IceCube measurements, including shaded regions representing the variation due to luminosity function uncertainties. This will make the 'well below' assessment more transparent and robust. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Forward calculation from observed flare spectrum and external luminosity function

full rationale

The paper models the electron distribution from the 3C 279 flaring state using multiwavelength observations, computes resonant W/Z production rates via standard particle physics cross sections, and integrates the resulting neutrino yield over an adopted FSRQ luminosity function plus redshift evolution drawn from the literature. No equation reduces the final diffuse flux to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and the central claim (flux many orders below IceCube data) is an output of the integration rather than an input. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on an assumed electron spectrum for a flaring state, a standard luminosity function with redshift evolution, and the applicability of laboratory electroweak cross sections inside a relativistic jet; none of these are derived in the paper.

free parameters (2)

electron distribution parameters in 3C 279 flare
The shape and normalization of the electron spectrum inside the jet blob are taken from multiwavelength observations and used directly to compute reaction rates.
FSRQ luminosity function parameters and redshift evolution
Standard published luminosity function and its evolution are adopted without re-derivation.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Laboratory electroweak cross sections for e+e- -> W/Z remain valid inside the relativistic jet environment
The paper applies standard particle-physics rates without modification for plasma or magnetic-field effects.
domain assumption The jet blob can be treated as a uniform target for electron-positron annihilation
No spatial structure or time-dependent effects inside the blob are modeled.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5845 in / 1551 out tokens · 33972 ms · 2026-05-18T08:14:30.305557+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We solve the Fokker–Planck equation … steady-state … electron energy distribution … reaction rates for W± and Z bosons … integrate over the FSRQ luminosity function Φ(L,z) … differential flux contribution exhibits a pronounced peak at redshift z∼1
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the flux from Z boson production within the jet blob is many orders of magnitude smaller than the total diffuse astrophysical neutrino flux

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · 17 internal anchors

[1]

Abrahamyan, A.M

H.V. Abrahamyan, A.M. Mickaelian, G.A. Mikayelyan, G.M. Paronyan, A.G. Sukiasyan, V.K. Mkrtchyan et al.,Classification of Blazars by Activity Types,Communications of the Byurakan Astrophysical Observatory70(2023) 83

work page 2023
[2]

Dermer, R

C.D. Dermer, R. Schlickeiser and A. Mastichiadis,High-energy gamma radiation from extragalactic radio sources.,Astronomy & Astrophysics256(1992) L27

work page 1992
[3]

Dermer and R

C.D. Dermer and R. Schlickeiser,Model for the High-Energy Emission from Blazars,The Astrophysical Journal416(1993) 458

work page 1993
[4]

Sikora, M.C

M. Sikora, M.C. Begelman and M.J. Rees,Comptonization of Diffuse Ambient Radiation by a Relativistic Jet: The Source of Gamma Rays from Blazars?,The Astrophysical Journal421 (1994) 153

work page 1994
[5]

Blandford and A

R.D. Blandford and A. Levinson,Pair Cascades in Extragalactic Jets. I. Gamma Rays,The Astrophysical Journal441(1995) 79

work page 1995
[6]

Ghisellini and P

G. Ghisellini and P. Madau,On the origin of the gamma-ray emission in blazars,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society280(1996) 67

work page 1996
[7]

A Study of High Energy Emission from the TeV blazar Mrk 501 during Multiwavelength Observations in 1996

J. Kataoka, J.R. Mattox, J. Quinn, H. Kubo, F. Makino, T. Takahashi et al.,High-Energy Emission from the TEV Blazar Markarian 501 during Multiwavelength Observations in 1996, The Astrophysical Journal514(1999) 138 [astro-ph/9811014]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[8]

Comptonization of Infrared Radiation from Hot Dust by Relativistic Jets in Quasars

M. B la˙ zejowski, M. Sikora, R. Moderski and G.M. Madejski,Comptonization of Infrared Radiation from Hot Dust by Relativistic Jets in Quasars,The Astrophysical Journal545 (2000) 107 [astro-ph/0008154]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000
[9]

Finke and P.A

J.D. Finke and P.A. Becker,Fourier analysis of blazar variability,The Astrophysical Journal 791(2014) 21

work page 2014
[10]

Finke and P.A

J.D. Finke and P.A. Becker,Fourier analysis of blazar variability: Klein–nishina effects and the jet scattering environment,The Astrophysical Journal809(2015) 85

work page 2015
[11]

The structure and emission model of the relativistic jet in the quasar 3C 279 inferred from radio to high-energy gamma-ray observations in 2008-2010

M. Hayashida, G.M. Madejski, K. Nalewajko, M. Sikora, A.E. Wehrle, P. Ogle et al.,The Structure and Emission Model of the Relativistic Jet in the Quasar 3C 279 Inferred from Radio to High-energyγ-Ray Observations in 2008-2010,The Astrophysical Journal754(2012) 114 [1206.0745]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[12]

Rapid Variability of Blazar 3C 279 during Flaring States in 2013-2014 with Joint Fermi-LAT, NuSTAR, Swift, and Ground-Based Multi-wavelength Observations

M. Hayashida, K. Nalewajko, G.M. Madejski, M. Sikora, R. Itoh, M. Ajello et al.,Rapid Variability of Blazar 3C 279 during Flaring States in 2013-2014 with Joint Fermi-LAT, NuSTAR, Swift, and Ground-Based Multiwavelength Observations,The Astrophysical Journal 807(2015) 79 [1502.04699]. – 17 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[13]

Lewis, J.D

T.R. Lewis, J.D. Finke and P.A. Becker,Electron Acceleration in Blazars: Application to the 3C 279 Flare on 2013 December 20,The Astrophysical Journal884(2019) 116 [1909.04431]

work page arXiv 2013
[14]

Diffusive Acceleration of Particles at Oblique, Relativistic, Magnetohydrodynamic Shocks

E.J. Summerlin and M.G. Baring,Diffusive Acceleration of Particles at Oblique, Relativistic, Magnetohydrodynamic Shocks,The Astrophysical Journal745(2012) 63 [1110.5968]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[15]

Turbulent, Extreme Multi-Zone Model for Simulating Flux and Polarization Variability in Blazars

A.P. Marscher,Turbulent, Extreme Multi-zone Model for Simulating Flux and Polarization Variability in Blazars,The Astrophysical Journal780(2014) 87 [1311.7665]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[16]

Katarzy´ nski, G

K. Katarzy´ nski, G. Ghisellini, F. Tavecchio, J. Gracia and L. Maraschi,Hard TeV spectra of blazars and the constraints to the infrared intergalactic background,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters368(2006) L52, doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00156.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2006.00156.x 2006
[17]

Formation of hard very-high energy spectra of blazars in leptonic models

E. Lefa, F.M. Rieger and F. Aharonian,Formation of Very Hard Gamma-Ray Spectra of Blazars in Leptonic Models,The Astrophysical Journal740(2011) 64 [1106.4201]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[18]

Asano and M

K. Asano and M. Hayashida,The most intensive gamma-ray flare of quasar 3c 279 with the second-order fermi acceleration,The Astrophysical Journal Letters808(2015) L18

work page 2015
[19]

Probing Acceleration and Turbulence at Relativistic Shocks in Blazar Jets

M.G. Baring, M. B¨ ottcher and E.J. Summerlin,Probing acceleration and turbulence at relativistic shocks in blazar jets,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society464(2017) 4875 [1609.03899]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[20]

Fast TeV variability in blazars: jets in a jet

D. Giannios, D.A. Uzdensky and M.C. Begelman,Fast TeV variability in blazars: jets in a jet, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society395(2009) L29 [0901.1877]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[21]

Reconnection-driven plasmoids in blazars: fast flares on a slow envelope

D. Giannios,Reconnection-driven plasmoids in blazars: fast flares on a slow envelope,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society431(2013) 355 [1211.0296]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[22]

Petropoulou and C.D

M. Petropoulou and C.D. Dermer,Properties of blazar jets defined by an economy of power, The Astrophysical Journal Letters825(2016) L11

work page 2016
[23]

Plasmoids in relativistic reconnection, from birth to adulthood: first they grow, then they go

L. Sironi, D. Giannios and M. Petropoulou,Plasmoids in relativistic reconnection, from birth to adulthood: first they grow, then they go,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 462(2016) 48 [1605.02071]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[24]

Sun and X.-N

X. Sun and X.-N. Bai,Particle diffusion and acceleration in magnetorotational instability turbulence,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society506(2021) 1128 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/506/1/1128/38933739/stab1643.pdf]

work page 2021
[25]

Ha,Pressure anisotropy and magnetic field geometry in magnetorotational instability of Kerr black hole accretion disks,Astrophysics and Space Science370(2025) 60

J.-H. Ha,Pressure anisotropy and magnetic field geometry in magnetorotational instability of Kerr black hole accretion disks,Astrophysics and Space Science370(2025) 60

work page 2025
[26]

Dermer, M

C.D. Dermer, M. Cerruti, B. Lott, C. Boisson and A. Zech,Equipartition gamma-ray blazars and the location of the gamma-ray emission site in 3c 279,The Astrophysical Journal782 (2014) 82

work page 2014
[27]

D. Yan, J. He, J. Liao, L. Zhang and S.-N. Zhang,Dynamic changes of emitting electron distribution in the jet of 3c 279: signatures of acceleration and cooling,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society456(2015) 2173 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/456/2/2173/18516272/stv2829.pdf]

work page 2015
[28]

Modelling the multi-wavelength emission of flat spectrum radio quasar 3C 279

Y.G. Zheng and C.Y. Yang,Modelling the multi-wavelength emission of flat-spectrum radio quasar 3C 279,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society457(2016) 3535 [1607.05768]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[29]

Rahman, S

A.A. Rahman, S. Sahayanathan, Z. Malik and P.A. Subha,Probing the ic/cmb interpretation for the x-ray knots of agns through vhe observations,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society524(2023) 3335 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/524/3/3335/50949037/stad2016.pdf]

work page 2023
[30]

Lewis, P.A

T.R. Lewis, P.A. Becker and J.D. Finke,Time-dependent electron acceleration in blazar transients: X-ray time lags and spectral formation,The Astrophysical Journal824(2016) 108. – 18 –

work page 2016
[31]

A Steady-State Spectral Model For Electron Acceleration And Cooling In Blazar Jets: Application To 3C 279

T.R. Lewis, J.D. Finke and P.A. Becker,A Steady-state Spectral Model for Electron Acceleration and Cooling in Blazar Jets: Application to 3C 279,The Astrophysical Journal 853(2018) 6 [1710.01334]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[32]

M¨ uller and G.E

A.L. M¨ uller and G.E. Romero,Radiation from the impact of broad-line region clouds onto AGN accretion disks,Astronomy & Astrophysics636(2020) A92 [2003.12438]

work page arXiv 2020
[33]

Glashow,Resonant Scattering of Antineutrinos,Physical Review118(1960) 316

S.L. Glashow,Resonant Scattering of Antineutrinos,Physical Review118(1960) 316

work page 1960
[34]

Berezinsky and A

V. Berezinsky and A. Gazizov,Cosmic neutrino and the possibility of searching for W bosons with masses 30-100 GeV in underwater experiments,JETP Letters25(1977) 276

work page 1977
[35]

IceCube Collaboration, M

A. IceCube Collaboration, M. G., R. Abbasi, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J.A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers et al.,Detection of a particle shower at the Glashow resonance with IceCube,Nature 591(2021) 220 [2110.15051]

work page arXiv 2021
[36]

Distefano,Giant ice cube hints at the existence of cosmic antineutrinos,Nature591(2021) 206

C. Distefano,Giant ice cube hints at the existence of cosmic antineutrinos,Nature591(2021) 206

work page 2021
[37]

Alikhanov,Excitation of the glashow resonance without neutrino beams,arXiv e-prints (2025) [2504.02820]

I. Alikhanov,Excitation of the glashow resonance without neutrino beams,arXiv e-prints (2025) [2504.02820]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

Blandford and R.L

R.D. Blandford and R.L. Znajek,Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society179(1977) 433

work page 1977
[39]

Gamma-ray emission and spectral evolution of pair plasmas in AGN jets

M. B¨ oettcher, H. Mause and R. Schlickeiser,γ-ray emission and spectral evolution of pair plasmas in AGN jets. I. General theory and a prediction for the GeV - TeV emission from ultrarelativistic jets.,Astronomy & Astrophysics324(1997) 395 [astro-ph/9604003]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[40]

Paliya, C

V.S. Paliya, C. Diltz, M. B¨ ottcher, C.S. Stalin and D. Buckley,A hard gamma-ray flare from 3c 279 in 2013 december,The Astrophysical Journal817(2016) 61

work page 2013
[41]

Sironi, A

L. Sironi, A. Spitkovsky and J. Arons,The maximum energy of accelerated particles in relativistic collisionless shocks,The Astrophysical Journal771(2013) 54

work page 2013
[42]

Plotnikov, A

I. Plotnikov, A. Grassi and M. Grech,Perpendicular relativistic shocks in magnetized pair plasma,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society477(2018) 5238 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/477/4/5238/24865216/sty979.pdf]

work page 2018
[43]

Cheng, W.H

H. Cheng, W.H. Chiu, Y. Fang, Y. Gao, J. Gu, G. Li et al.,The Physics potential of the CEPC. Prepared for the US Snowmass Community Planning Exercise (Snowmass 2021),arXiv e-prints(2022) arXiv:2205.08553 [2205.08553]

work page arXiv 2021
[44]

Agapov, M

I. Agapov, M. Benedikt, A. Blondel, M. Boscolo, O. Brunner, M. Chamizo Llatas et al.,Future Circular Lepton Collider FCC-ee: Overview and Status,arXiv e-prints(2022) arXiv:2203.08310 [2203.08310]

work page arXiv 2022
[45]

All-sky search for time-integrated neutrino emission from astrophysical sources with 7 years of IceCube data

M.G. Aartsen, K. Abraham, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J.A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers et al.,All-sky Search for Time-integrated Neutrino Emission from Astrophysical Sources with 7 yr of IceCube Data,The Astrophysical Journal835(2017) 151 [1609.04981]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[46]

Aiello, A

S. Aiello, A. Albert, M. Alshamsi, S. Alves Garre, Z. Aly, A. Ambrosone et al.,Differential Sensitivity of the KM3NeT/ARCA detector to a diffuse neutrino flux and to point-like source emission: Exploring the case of the Starburst Galaxies,Astroparticle Physics162(2024) 102990 [2402.09088]

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

Aynutdinov, V.A

V.M. Aynutdinov, V.A. Allakhverdyan, A.D. Avrorin, A.V. Avrorin, Z. Bardaˇ cov´ a, I.A. Belolaptikov et al.,Large neutrino telescope Baikal-GVD: recent status,arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2309.16310 [2309.16310]

work page arXiv 2023
[48]

ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration, OPAL Collaboration, SLD Collaboration, LEP Electroweak Working Group et al.,Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance,Physics Reports427(2006) 257. – 19 –

work page 2006
[49]

The Luminosity Function of Fermi-detected Flat-Spectrum Radio Quasars

M. Ajello, M.S. Shaw, R.W. Romani, C.D. Dermer, L. Costamante, O.G. King et al.,The Luminosity Function of Fermi-detected Flat-spectrum Radio Quasars,The Astrophysical Journal751(2012) 108 [1110.3787]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[50]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astronomy & Astrophysics641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]. – 20 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018