pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.12457 · v4 · submitted 2025-10-14 · 🪐 quant-ph

Experimental verification of multi-copy activation of genuine multipartite entanglement

Robert St\'arek , Tim Gollerthan , Olga Leskovjanov\'a , Michael Meth , Peter Tirler , Nicolai Friis , Martin Ringbauer , Ladislav Mi\v{s}ta Jr This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 07:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords genuine multipartite entanglementmulti-copy activationbiseparable statestrapped ionsquantum processorthree-qubit entanglemententanglement activationquantum information
0
0 comments X

The pith

Genuine multipartite entanglement activates from two copies of a biseparable three-qubit state.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that genuine multipartite entanglement, a form of correlation that cannot arise from mixtures of partially separable states, can appear when two copies of a three-qubit state are examined together even though each copy by itself remains biseparable. The authors prepare the individual states on a trapped-ion processor and perform joint measurements that reveal statistics impossible to explain without GME in the combined system. A sympathetic reader cares because the result indicates that entanglement resources need not be present in every individual state and that combining copies can unlock capabilities unavailable to any single copy. This shifts attention from single-state preparation to multi-copy strategies for quantum tasks.

Core claim

The central discovery is the experimental observation of unambiguous GME activation: two copies of a biseparable three-qubit state, each lacking GME, produce joint measurement outcomes that certify genuine multipartite entanglement in the combined system when realized on a trapped-ion quantum processor.

What carries the argument

Joint measurements on two copies of a biseparable three-qubit state that detect activation of GME through statistics incompatible with any biseparable explanation.

If this is right

  • GME can be obtained for tasks without ever preparing a single GME state.
  • Multi-copy protocols extend the set of states usable as resources for quantum communication and computation.
  • Resource theories of entanglement must account for activation effects when states are supplied in multiple copies.
  • Trapped-ion processors can implement the necessary joint operations to reveal such activation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same activation principle may apply to states with other forms of partial separability or to systems with more than three qubits.
  • Networks that distribute individual biseparable states could still generate GME at the receiver by combining copies.
  • Activation thresholds could be mapped as a function of copy number to guide experimental resource planning.

Load-bearing premise

The single-copy states prepared in the experiment are genuinely biseparable and the observed joint statistics contain no undetected systematic errors that could produce the appearance of activation.

What would settle it

A re-characterization of the prepared single-copy states using an independent entanglement witness that finds GME in each copy individually, or a full tomographic reconstruction of the two-copy state whose statistics are explainable by a biseparable model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.12457 by Ladislav Mi\v{s}ta Jr, Martin Ringbauer, Michael Meth, Nicolai Friis, Olga Leskovjanov\'a, Peter Tirler, Robert St\'arek, Tim Gollerthan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Illustration of the robust biseparable two-copy GME-activatable state ρABC [Eq. (6)]. The dark orange oval regions represent the sets of separable states across bipartitions A∣BC, B∣AC, and C∣AB. The light orange regions represent the GME-activatable states. The union of the orange regions represents the set of biseparable states, while the light-blue region outside contains the GME states. The orange … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A central concept in quantum information processing is genuine multipartite entanglement (GME), a type of correlation beyond biseparability, that is, correlations that cannot be explained by statistical mixtures of partially separable states. GME is relevant for characterizing and benchmarking complex quantum systems, and it is an important resource for applications such as quantum communication. Remarkably, it has been found that GME can be activated from multiple copies of biseparable quantum states, which do not possess GME individually. Here, we experimentally demonstrate unambiguous evidence of such GME activation from two copies of a biseparable three-qubit state in a trapped-ion quantum processor. These results not only challenge notions of quantum resources but also highlight the potential of using multiple copies of quantum states to achieve tasks beyond the capabilities of the individual copies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration, performed on a trapped-ion quantum processor, of genuine multipartite entanglement (GME) activation: two copies of a three-qubit biseparable state are prepared and jointly measured to produce a two-copy state that exhibits GME, even though each individual copy is claimed to be biseparable.

Significance. If the single-copy biseparability is rigorously certified and the two-copy GME detection is free of undetected systematics, the result would supply the first experimental verification of multi-copy GME activation. This would strengthen the conceptual distinction between single-copy and multi-copy quantum resources and could inform protocols that exploit multiple copies to surpass the capabilities of individual states.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results section (single-copy characterization)] Results section (single-copy characterization): The claim that each prepared three-qubit state is strictly biseparable rests on witness operators or partial tomography. The manuscript must report the numerical witness values, their statistical uncertainties, and the full set of measurement outcomes so that it can be verified that the prepared density matrices lie inside the biseparable set within experimental error; without these data the activation claim cannot be distinguished from residual single-copy GME.
  2. [Methods and two-copy measurement] Methods and two-copy measurement: The joint measurement statistics used to certify GME in the combined six-qubit state must be accompanied by a complete description of the witness operator, any post-selection criteria, and calibration procedures. The current presentation leaves open the possibility that undetected systematic errors or finite-statistics effects could produce an apparent activation signal.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the number of experimental repetitions and the method used to extract error bars so that readers can assess statistical significance without consulting the supplementary material.
  2. [Theory section] Notation for the biseparable witness operators should be defined once in the main text rather than only in the supplementary information.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions have been made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Results section (single-copy characterization): The claim that each prepared three-qubit state is strictly biseparable rests on witness operators or partial tomography. The manuscript must report the numerical witness values, their statistical uncertainties, and the full set of measurement outcomes so that it can be verified that the prepared density matrices lie inside the biseparable set within experimental error; without these data the activation claim cannot be distinguished from residual single-copy GME.

    Authors: We agree that explicit numerical values, uncertainties, and raw data are required for rigorous verification of biseparability. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection to the Results section that reports the measured expectation values of the GME witnesses for each individual copy, together with statistical uncertainties obtained via bootstrap resampling of the experimental counts. The full set of measurement outcomes (including all Pauli-basis expectation values) is now provided in the supplementary material. These data confirm that the witness values remain negative within error bars and that the prepared states lie inside the biseparable set, consistent with the activation claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Methods and two-copy measurement: The joint measurement statistics used to certify GME in the combined six-qubit state must be accompanied by a complete description of the witness operator, any post-selection criteria, and calibration procedures. The current presentation leaves open the possibility that undetected systematic errors or finite-statistics effects could produce an apparent activation signal.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on experimental transparency. The revised Methods section now contains the explicit form of the six-qubit GME witness operator (expressed as a linear combination of two-qubit Pauli observables), a complete list of post-selection criteria (discarding events with ion loss or detection infidelity above a calibrated threshold), and the calibration protocols used for the trapped-ion processor (including laser-power stabilization and magnetic-field compensation). We have also added a finite-statistics analysis based on Monte Carlo sampling of the measured counts, demonstrating that the observed negative witness value for the two-copy state exceeds the biseparability bound even under conservative error models. The raw joint measurement statistics are included in the supplementary information. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in experimental verification

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental demonstration of genuine multipartite entanglement activation from two copies of a biseparable three-qubit state prepared on a trapped-ion processor. The central claim rests on empirical preparation, single-copy biseparability certification via witnesses or tomography, and observation of joint two-copy GME statistics rather than any mathematical derivation chain. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the result to its own inputs appear in the abstract or described protocol. The result is self-contained as an empirical observation whose validity hinges on experimental controls and error analysis, not on internal redefinition or circular justification.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the prior theoretical result that GME can be activated from multiple biseparable copies and on standard assumptions about the fidelity of state preparation and measurement in trapped-ion systems.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The theoretical activation of GME from multiple biseparable copies is valid.
    Abstract states that the activation effect has been found theoretically and the experiment verifies it.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5691 in / 1149 out tokens · 40311 ms · 2026-05-18T07:27:38.747001+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · 14 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    For instance, for three-copy GME activation of the mixture given by Eq

    Another factor is the significant increase in re- source requirements for witness-based GME certification and biseparability checks. For instance, for three-copy GME activation of the mixture given by Eq. (6) with q = 0.26, the SDP defined in Eq. (4) does not find any two-copy GME witness. However, a three-copy witness comprising 128 Pauli strings exists,...

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    The Quantum Internet

    H. Jeff Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature 453, 1023 (2008), arXiv:0806.4195

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    Wolfgang D¨ ur, Raphael Lamprecht, and Stefan Heusler, Towards a quantum internet, Eur. J. Phys. 38, 043001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Photonics 11, 678 (2017)

    Christoph Simon, Towards a global quantum network, Nat. Photonics 11, 678 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Figure A.1

    Stephanie Wehner, David Elkouss, and Ronald Hanson, Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead, Science 362, eaam9288 (2018). Figure A.1. Histogram of two-copy witness value obtained by Monte Carlo resampling of the original tomogram

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Angela Sara Cacciapuoti, Marcello Caleffi, Francesco Tafuri, Francesco Saverio Cataliotti, Stefano Gherardini, and Giuseppe Bianchi, Quantum Internet: Networking Challenges in Distributed Quantum Computing, IEEE Network 34, 137–143 (2020), arXiv:1810.08421

    work page arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Miguel Navascues, Elie Wolfe, Denis Rosset, and Ale- jandro Pozas-Kerstjens, Genuine Network Multipartite Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 240505 (2020), arXiv:2002.02773

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Causal Inference 8, 70 (2020), arXiv:1707.06476

    Miguel Navascu´ es and Elie Wolfe, The Inflation Tech- nique Completely Solves the Causal Compatibility Prob- lem, J. Causal Inference 8, 70 (2020), arXiv:1707.06476

    work page arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Tristan Kraft, S´ ebastien Designolle, Christina Ritz, Nico- las Brunner, Otfried G¨ uhne, and Marcus Huber, Quan- tum entanglement in the triangle network, Phys. Rev. A 103, L060401 (2021), arXiv:2002.03970

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Elie Wolfe, Alejandro Pozas-Kerstjens, Matan Grinberg, Denis Rosset, Antonio Ac´ ın, and Miguel Navascu´ es, Quantum Inflation: A General Approach to Quantum Causal Compatibility, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021043 (2021), arXiv:1909.10519

    work page arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Tristan Kraft, Cornelia Spee, Xiao-Dong Yu, and Ot- fried G¨ uhne,Characterizing quantum networks: Insights from coherence theory, Phys. Rev. A 103, 052405 (2021), arXiv:2006.06693

    work page arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Kiara Hansenne, Zhen-Peng Xu, Tristan Kraft, and Otfried G¨ uhne,Symmetries in quantum networks lead to no-go theorems for entanglement distribution and to verification techniques, Nat. Commun. 13, 496 (2022), arXiv:2108.02732

    work page arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Nicky Kai Hong Li, Xi Dai, Manuel H. Mu˜ noz-Arias, Kevin Reuer, Marcus Huber, and Nicolai Friis, Detecting genuine multipartite entanglement in multi-qubit devices with restricted measurements, arXiv:2504.21076 [quant- ph] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    de Vicente, Genuine Multipartite Nonlocality Is Intrinsic to Quantum Networks, Phys

    Patricia Contreras-Tejada, Carlos Palazuelos, and Julio I. de Vicente, Genuine Multipartite Nonlocality Is Intrinsic to Quantum Networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 040501 (2021), arXiv:2004.01722

    work page arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    de Vicente, Asymptotic Survival of Genuine Mul- 9 tipartite Entanglement in Noisy Quantum Networks De- pends on the Topology, Phys

    Patricia Contreras-Tejada, Carlos Palazuelos, and Julio I. de Vicente, Asymptotic Survival of Genuine Mul- 9 tipartite Entanglement in Noisy Quantum Networks De- pends on the Topology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 220501 (2022), arXiv:2106.04634

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Simon Morelli, David Sauerwein, Michalis Skotiniotis, and Nicolai Friis, Metrology-assisted entanglement dis- tribution in noisy quantum networks, Quantum 6, 722 (2022), arXiv:2110.15627

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Collodo, Arne Wulff, Lucien Wernli, Adrian Copetudo, Daniel Malz, Paul Magnard, Abdulkadir Akin, Mihai Gabureac, Graham J

    Jean-Claude Besse, Kevin Reuer, Michele C. Collodo, Arne Wulff, Lucien Wernli, Adrian Copetudo, Daniel Malz, Paul Magnard, Abdulkadir Akin, Mihai Gabureac, Graham J. Norris, J. Ignacio Cirac, Andreas Wallraff, and Christopher Eichler, Realizing a deterministic source of multipartite-entangled photonic qubits, Nat. Commun. 11, 4877 (2020), arXiv:2005.07060

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Matteo Pompili, Sophie L. N. Hermans, Simon Baier, Hans K. C. Beukers, Peter C. Humphreys, Raymond N. Schouten, Raymond F. L. Vermeulen, Marijn J. Tiggel- man, Laura dos Santos Martins, Bas Dirkse, Stephanie Wehner, and Ronald Hanson, Realization of a multi- node quantum network of remote solid-state qubits, Sci- ence 372, 259 (2021), arXiv:2102.04471

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Andrei Ruskuc, Chun-Ju Wu, Emanuel Green, So- phie L. N. Hermans, William Pajak, Joonhee Choi, and Andrei Faraon, Multiplexed entanglement of multi- emitter quantum network nodes, Nature 639, 54 (2025), arXiv:2402.16224

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Jixuan Shi, Sheng Zhang, Yukai Wu, Yuedong Sun, Yibo Liang, Hai Wang, Yunfei Pu, and Luming Duan, Scalable and modular generation of multipar- tite entangled states through memory-enhanced fusion, arXiv:2504.16399 [quant-ph] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Lanyon, Gen- eration of multipartite photonic entanglement using a trapped-ion quantum processing node, arXiv:2510.15693 (2025)

    Marco Canteri, James Bate, Ida Mishra, Nicolai Friis, Victor Krutyanskiy, and Benjamin P. Lanyon, Gen- eration of multipartite photonic entanglement using a trapped-ion quantum processing node, arXiv:2510.15693 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Bertlmann and Nicolai Friis, Modern Quan- tum Theory – From Quantum Mechanics to Entan- glement and Quantum Information (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 2023)

    Reinhold A. Bertlmann and Nicolai Friis, Modern Quan- tum Theory – From Quantum Mechanics to Entan- glement and Quantum Information (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    G´ eza T´ oth, Multipartite entanglement and high- precision metrology, Phys. Rev. A 85, 022322 (2012), arXiv:1006.4368

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  24. [24]

    Quantum computing via measurements only

    Robert Raussendorf and Hans J. Briegel, A One-Way Quantum Computer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188–5191 (2001), arXiv:quant-ph/0010033

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  25. [25]

    Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles

    Hans J. Briegel and Robert Raussendorf, Persistent En- tanglement in Arrays of Interacting Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 910–913 (2001), arXiv:quant-ph/0004051

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  26. [26]

    Scott, Multipartite entanglement, quantum- error-correcting codes, and entangling power of quantum evolutions, Phys

    Andrew J. Scott, Multipartite entanglement, quantum- error-correcting codes, and entangling power of quantum evolutions, Phys. Rev. A 69, 052330 (2004), arXiv:quant- ph/0310137

    work page arXiv 2004

  27. [27]

    Michael Epping, Hermann Kampermann, Chiara Mac- chiavello, and Dagmar Bruß, Multi-partite entanglement can speed up quantum key distribution in networks, New J. Phys. 19, 093012 (2017), arXiv:1612.05585

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    Matej Pivoluska, Marcus Huber, and Mehul Malik, Lay- ered quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. A 97, 032312 (2018), arXiv:1709.00377

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    J´ er´ emy Ribeiro, Gl´ aucia Murta, and Stephanie Wehner, Fully device-independent conference key agreement,Phys. Rev. A 97, 022307 (2018), arXiv:1708.00798

    work page arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Stefan B¨ auml and Koji Azuma, Fundamental limitation on quantum broadcast networks, Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 024004 (2017), arXiv:1609.03994

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Hayata Yamasaki, Alexander Pirker, Mio Murao, Wolf- gang D¨ ur, and Barbara Kraus, Multipartite entangle- ment outperforming bipartite entanglement under limited quantum system sizes, Phys. Rev. A 98, 052313 (2018), arXiv:1808.00005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    Marcus Huber and Martin Plesch, Purification of gen- uine multipartite entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 83, 062321 (2011), arXiv:1103.4294

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  33. [33]

    Hayata Yamasaki, Simon Morelli, Markus Miethlinger, Jessica Bavaresco, Nicolai Friis, and Marcus Huber, Ac- tivation of genuine multipartite entanglement: beyond the single-copy paradigm of entanglement characterisation, Quantum 6, 695 (2022), arXiv:2106.01372

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    de Vicente, Genuine mul- tipartite entanglement of quantum states in the multiple- copy scenario, Quantum 6, 735 (2022), arXiv:2201.08694

    Carlos Palazuelos and Julio I. de Vicente, Genuine mul- tipartite entanglement of quantum states in the multiple- copy scenario, Quantum 6, 735 (2022), arXiv:2201.08694

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Kl´ ara Baksov´ a, Olga Leskovjanov´ a, Ladislav Miˇ sta Jr., Elizabeth Agudelo, and Nicolai Friis, Multi-copy activation of genuine multipartite entanglement in continuous-variable systems, Quantum 9, 1699 (2025), arXiv:2312.16570

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Lisa T. Weinbrenner, Kl´ ara Baksov´ a, Sophia Denker, Si- mon Morelli, Xiao-Dong Yu, Nicolai Friis, and Otfried G¨ uhne,Superactivation and Incompressibility of Genuine Multipartite Entanglement, arXiv:2412.18331 [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Yu-Ao Chen, Rui Zhang, Yue-Yang Fei, Zhenhuan Liu, Xingjian Zhang, Xu-Fei Yin, Yingqiu Mao, Li Li, Nai- Le Liu, Xiongfeng Ma, and Jian-Wei Pan, Entangle- ment Activation in Multiphoton Distillation Networks, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3828402/v1 (2024)

    work page doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3828402/v1 2024

  38. [38]

    Experimental multiparticle entanglement dynamics induced by decoherence

    Julio T. Barreiro, Philipp Schindler, Otfried G¨ uhne, Thomas Monz, Michael Chwalla, Christian F. Roos, Markus Hennrich, and Rainer Blatt, Experimental mul- tiparticle entanglement dynamics induced by decoherence, Nat. Phys. 6, 943–946 (2010), arXiv:1005.1965

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  39. [39]

    Martin Hofmann, Andreas Osterloh, and Otfried G¨ uhne, Scaling of genuine multiparticle entanglement close to a quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014), arXiv:1309.2217

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  40. [40]

    Bastian Jungnitsch, Tobias Moroder, and Otfried G¨ uhne,Taming Multiparticle Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 190502 (2011), arXiv:1010.6049

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  41. [41]

    Asher Peres, Separability Criterion for Density Matri- ces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996), arXiv:quant- ph/9604005

    work page arXiv 1996

  42. [42]

    Pawe l Horodecki, Separability criterion and inseparable mixed states with positive partial transposition, Phys. Lett. A 232, 333 (1997), arXiv:quant-ph/9703004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  43. [43]

    Martin Ringbauer, Michael Meth, Lukas Postler, Roman Stricker, Rainer Blatt, Philipp Schindler, and Thomas Monz, A universal qudit quantum processor with trapped ions, Nat. Phys. 18, 1053–1057 (2022), arXiv:2109.06903

    work page arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Anders Sørensen and Klaus Mølmer, Quantum Computa- tion with Ions in Thermal Motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1971–1974 (1999), arXiv:quant-ph/9810039

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1971

  45. [45]

    Zdenˇ ek Hradil, JaroslavˇReh´ aˇ cek, Jarom´ ır Fiur´ aˇ sek, and Miroslav Jeˇ zek,Maximum-likelihood methods in quantum mechanics, in Quantum State Estimation, edited by Mat- teo Paris and Jaroslav ˇReh´ aˇ cek (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004) pp. 59–112

    work page 2004

  46. [46]

    Robert St´ arek, Tim Gollerthan, Olga Leskovjanov´ a, 10 Michael Meth, Peter Tirler, Nicolai Friis, Martin Ring- bauer, and Ladislav Miˇ sta, Jr.,Experimental verification of multi-copy activation of genuine multipartite entangle- ment - data and code, (2025)

    work page 2025