Rogue waves and large deviations for 2D pure gravity deep water waves

Alberto Maspero; Gigliola Staffilani; Massimiliano Berti; Ricardo Grande

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 73 references

Rogue waves and large deviations for 2D pure gravity deep water waves

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A rigorous large-deviation principle shows that for weak random Gaussian seas, the probability of an extreme crest decays like exp(-λ0² ε^(-2δ)/(2σ²)), matching the Gaussian heuristic, and that such crests arise by phase quasi-synchronizati

desk verdict Smart, ambitious paper whose main lower-bound proof has a repairable but real gap; worth a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.15159 v4 pith:33ZOV2NW submitted 2025-10-16 math.AP math-phmath.MPmath.PR

Massimiliano Berti , Ricardo Grande , Alberto Maspero , Gigliola Staffilani This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.APmath-phmath.MPmath.PR MSC 35Q3576B1560F10

keywords roguewaveslargedeviationsdeepwatergravitydispersivefocusingBirkhoffnormalformrandomGaussianinitialdataquasilinearPDE

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a large-deviation principle for rogue waves in the full pure-gravity deep-water water-wave equations, not a simplified model. Starting from random Gaussian initial data of typical size ε, it proves that the probability of seeing a crest of size λ0 ε^(1-δ) at time |t| ≤ ε^(-3(1-δ)+κ) is asymptotically exp(-λ0² ε^(-2δ)/(2σ²)) — the same tail a linear Gaussian theory would predict. The result holds up to the optimal times allowed by deterministic well-posedness, and it identifies the dominant formation mechanism: dispersive focusing, in which the phases of the first many Fourier modes nearly align to amplify the crest. The proof combines an integrable quartic Birkhoff normal form with a random fixed-point argument, and does not require the evolved solution itself to be Gaussian.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Birkhoff normal form of the pure-gravity deep-water water-wave system: a near-identity, Lipschitz transformation that puts the Hamiltonian into an integrable quartic form, leaving only a quartic remainder. Because the normal form is integrable through quartic order, approximate solutions can be defined whose phases evolve according to the nonlinear frequencies L_k(I) of the actions. On the optimal timescale the central probabilistic mechanism is a random fixed-point map: for each realization of moduli and high modes, a random Brouwer fixed point supplies initial phases that exactly synchronize at time t; Lipschitz estimates then show that random phases within a

What would settle it

Simulate the full pure-gravity deep-water water-wave equations with the Gaussian initial data (1.13) for a decreasing sequence of ε, and for fixed λ0 and δ ∈ (3/5,1) measure the quantity ε^(2δ) log P(sup_x η(t,x) ≥ λ0 ε^(1-δ)) at a time |t| ≈ ε^(-3(1-δ)). If the limit is not -λ0²/(2σ²), or if the crest events do not asymptotically coincide with quasi-synchronization of the first ε^(-γ) phases, the theorem's claim is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper proves Theorem 1.1: for any λ0 > 0 and δ ∈ (0,1), the random water-wave surface with initial data as in (1.13) satisfies lim_{ε→0+} ε^(2δ) log P(sup_x η(t,x) ≥ λ0 ε^(1-δ)) = -λ0²/(2σ²), for |t| ≤ ε^(-5(1-δ)/2+κ), and, provided δ ∈ (3/5,1), for the longer optimal times |t| ≤ ε^(-3(1-δ)+κ). Theorem 1.2 adds that the same asymptotic probability is obtained when the first M phases are required to be quasi-synchronized: rogue waves arise by dispersive focusing. On the shorter timescale the approximate solution preserves Gaussianity; on the optimal timescale a new, non-Gaussian approximate solution with nonlinearly evolving phases is tracked through a random fixed point, Lipschitz stabil

Load-bearing premise

The proof depends on the deep-water normal form being exactly integrable through quartic order, with a Lipschitz normalizing map and a quartic remainder; if that structure fails or the remainder is larger than quartic, the long-time existence of order ε^(-3(1-δ)) and the random fixed-point lower bound both collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The Gaussian tail formula for rogue-wave probability is justified rigorously for the full water-wave equations in the weakly nonlinear regime, up to times of order ε^(-3(1-δ)).
Extreme crests occur essentially only when the first N = ε^(-γ) Fourier phases quasi-synchronize; the asymptotic probability of the crest equals that of the phase-alignment event.
Nonlinearity does not change the exponential rate of the rogue-wave tail up to optimal times: the rate is set by the initial variance σ².
The method yields a template for tail probabilities of Hamiltonian PDEs with an integrable normal form and random Gaussian data, without constructing invariant or quasi-invariant measures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

One could test whether the same rate holds in finite depth or with surface tension; the paper's argument suggests the rate is pinned by the linear variance σ² whenever a quartic integrable normal form exists, but that is an extrapolation.
The synchronizing-phase picture implies a possible observable: monitoring the phases of the first few Fourier components of a measured sea state might give advance warning of an elevated rogue-wave probability—an implication the paper does not draw.
Because the proof uses only the quartic integrability and Lipschitz normal-form control, the same large-deviation mechanism plausibly applies to other quasilinear Hamiltonian PDEs, such as gravity-capillary waves, whose normal form is integrable to the same order.
The role of the exponential decay of the coefficients c_j could be examined: if the spectrum decays only algebraically, the same formula with a redefined σ² might still hold provided the normal-form theory survives, but this is speculative.
The factorization property suggests the tail probability splits into an amplitude factor and a phase-alignment factor; this may generalize to other Hamiltonian systems with random data and integrable normal forms, though the paper does not claim that extension.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague — this is a serious paper. It proves, up to the optimal ε^{-3} timescale, the large-deviation formula for rogue crests in the full pure-gravity water-wave system, matching the exponential law from the oceanography literature and showing dispersive focusing is the mechanism. That is genuinely new; no prior work goes beyond semilinear models or formal heuristics for this system. The machinery is substantial. The Lipschitz version of the Birkhoff normal form (Theorem 2.4, Appendix A) is a real extension of [5] and is the backbone of the probabilistic argument. The two-step approximate solutions in Sections 4 and 5 are carefully chosen, and the random Brouwer fixed-point construction is clever. The upper bounds and the shorter-timescale Gaussian preservation are in decent shape. The soft spot is in Section 5.2, as the stress-test note says. The event N(α) in (5.21) uses absolute distance to φ*, but φ* is produced as a fixed point in K=[-Nε^{-3}, Nε^{-3}]^{2N}, not on the torus. For a fixed φ*_j far outside [0,2π), the probability that a uniform phase φ^ω_j falls within α is zero, not α/π. So the asserted probability (α/π)^{2N} and the factorization (5.23) are unsupported as written. Since this feeds directly into the lower bound in Proposition 5.7, the main theorem's optimal-timescale claim is not fully proved. The fix is fairly natural — work modulo 2π, or prove that the fixed point can be chosen with components in [0,2π) — but it is not a cosmetic change: T is defined on R^{2N}, and the circular reduction needs actual argument. There is also a smaller gap in Lemma 4.3: in the conditional-expectation step, X_k is not included in the conditioning σ-algebra, so the application of Lemma 4.2 is not justified as written. That one looks like a routine repair. Overall: the architecture is credible, the deterministic normal-form work is careful, and the citation pattern is fine (the overlap with [5] is real but they build a new Lipschitz version and don't assume the result). For the right reader — mathematical PDE with probabilistic taste, or wave-turbulence specialists — the paper is worth engaging with. It deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject. I'd send it to review and ask for a revision that fixes the lower-bound probability argument; if that repair works, the result stands.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a large-deviation principle for the formation of rogue waves in the 2D pure-gravity deep-water water-wave system with random Gaussian initial data of small amplitude ε. The main result, Theorem 1.1, states that for crest heights λ0 ε^{1-δ}, the probability is exp(-λ0^2 ε^{-2δ}/(2σ^2) + o(ε^{-2δ})) on time scales |t| ≤ ε^{-5(1-δ)/2 + κ} (all δ) and, for δ>3/5, up to the optimal |t| ≤ ε^{-3(1-δ)+κ}. The proof combines a deterministic Birkhoff normal form with a Lipschitz normal-form map (Theorem 2.4, proved in Appendix A), a Gaussian approximate solution for shorter times, and, for optimal times, a random Brouwer fixed-point argument showing that rogue waves arise from quasi-synchronization of the first N_ε Fourier phases (Theorem 1.2). The paper also presents the deterministic well-posedness and normal-form tools in a self-contained way.

Significance. If the proof is completed, this is a major advance: it would be the first sharp large-deviation result for a quasilinear Hamiltonian PDE up to the optimal deterministic time scale, rigorously confirming oceanographic predictions based on dispersive focusing. The combination of integrable normal forms, quantitative Lipschitz dependence of the flow, and probabilistic estimates is novel and likely to be influential. The deterministic normal-form theorem with Lipschitz bounds is a substantial and useful contribution on its own. The probabilistic structure is clearly laid out, and the upper-bound arguments are convincing. However, the lower-bound proof on optimal timescales contains a load-bearing gap in the factorization/measure computation of the quasi-synchronization event, so the main theorem is not yet established as written.

major comments (2)

[§5.2, Theorem 5.3(a)-(c), Eqs. (5.21)-(5.23), (5.45)] The lower bound in §5.3 rests on the assertion P(N(α))=(α/π)^{2N}. This is not justified for the set N(α) defined in (5.21), because the random fixed point φ* produced by the random Brouwer argument lies in K=[-Nε^{-3},Nε^{-3}]^{2N} (see (5.38)), not necessarily in [0,2π)^{2N}. Conditional on the sub-σ-algebra eF, φ* is a fixed point y, and the probability that a uniform phase φ^ω_j lies within α of y in the absolute distance is not α/π when y_j∉[0,2π); it can be zero on a set of positive measure. Since α is exponentially small (5.45), the factorization (5.23) and hence the key estimates (5.40), (5.46)-(5.49) are unsupported. The gap is repairable: the partially randomized data (5.13) and hence T_j in (5.17) are 2π-periodic in each φ_j, so one can reduce φ* modulo 2π and redefine N(α) using circular distance. However, this reduction is absent from the proof, and the stability estimate (5
[Lemma 4.3 and its proof, Eqs. (4.20)-(4.23)] The proof of preservation of Gaussianity uses characteristic functions E[e^{iλ φ}] with arbitrary real λ and asserts that h(r_0,...,r_m)=h(0,...,0) by translation invariance of the uniform distribution. This is false for non-integer λ: E[e^{iλ(φ+r)}] = e^{iλ r} E[e^{iλ φ}], which depends on r unless λ is an integer and E[e^{iλ φ}]=0 for nonzero integer λ. The argument can be repaired by restricting to integer frequencies (the usual characteristic function on T), because then the stated translation invariance holds for the nonzero modes; however, as written, the lemma is not proved. Since Lemma 4.4 and the Section 4 lower bound rely on this lemma, the proof needs correction.

minor comments (4)

[Proof of Theorem 5.3(a), after Eq. (5.21)] The proof states 'Its measure is (2α)^{2N}', which is inconsistent with the claimed value (α/π)^{2N}. This typo is symptomatic of the missing modulo-2π treatment; the correct statement for a uniform variable on [0,2π) and circular distance is (α/π)^{2N}.
[§5.3, proof of (5.47)] The text reads 'P(B_0^c) ≤ -exp(...)'; the minus sign is a typo and should be removed. The intended inequality is the upper bound from (3.8).
[Introduction, Eq. (1.2) and explanation] The notation H_0^{-3+} in the informal statement is not defined; it is later explained via ε and δ, but a one-line definition at first use would improve readability.
[General presentation] The proof of Theorem 3.1(i) in Section 4 is long and mixes several constants (C, R, κ); a table of the main parameters (ε, δ, κ, N, α, R) and their scaling roles would help the reader navigate the estimates.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the LDP rate is derived from Gaussian tail estimates and deterministic normal-form control, not assumed.

full rationale

The central large-deviation rate in Theorem 1.1 is obtained by a genuine two-sided estimate, not by importing the target formula. The upper bound (Proposition 5.2) uses the deterministic approximation Lemma 5.1 to reduce the rogue-wave event to the tail of the random variable ε/√π Σ c_j R_j, whose exponent is computed from the independent Rayleigh LDP (Lemma 4.5, ultimately a standard Cramér-type estimate); no constant is fitted to the target rate. The lower bound (Proposition 5.7) uses the random Brouwer fixed point (Theorem 5.3) to construct a phase-synchronization event N(α), computes its probability from the uniform law of the independent initial phases, and multiplies it by the independently computed amplitude tail; the smallness of (α/π)^{2N} is then chosen to be subdominant, not to match the desired exponent. The integrable quartic Birkhoff normal form is not merely cited as a black box: Theorem 2.4 is proved in Appendix A with the new Lipschitz properties, and the underlying integrability is a previously published theorem [5] with a proof; the present paper develops a variant of it. The author-overlapping self-citations [5,37] are load-bearing in the sense that they supply external deterministic and probabilistic tools, but they do not contain the target statement and are not a reduction of the result to its own inputs. I also weighed the skeptical objection to P(N(α)) = (α/π)^{2N}: that is a possible correctness gap in the proof of Proposition 5.3(a), concerning the domain of the fixed point and circular distances, not a circularity of the derivation; if valid it would make the lower bound unsupported, not tautological. Overall no step in the derivation chain reduces the claimed LDP to a fitted parameter or to a self-referential definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted constants, no ad-hoc potentials, and no new physical entities are introduced. The random fixed point is a mathematical device, not an entity. The only chosen model parameter is the smoothness decay b in the random data, which is not fitted and does not affect the form of the result. The central claim rests on prior deterministic normal-form theory and standard probabilistic tools.

free parameters (1)

exponential decay rate b in c_j=e^{-|j|b}
Chosen by hand in (1.14) to make the random initial data almost-surely smooth; not fitted to data, and the main theorem holds for any b>0 with σ^2 defined accordingly.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The pure-gravity deep-water water-wave Birkhoff normal form is integrable up to quartic order, with a Lipschitz normal-form transformation and quartic remainder (Theorem 2.4 and Appendix A).
This is the key deterministic input; it underlies the long-time existence up to ε^{-3(1-δ)} and the accuracy of the approximate solutions in Lemmas 4.1 and 5.1. It is inherited from Zakharov–Dyachenko [72] and Berti–Feola–Pusateri [5], with a new Lipschitz variant proved here.
domain assumption Local well-posedness of the water-wave system in Sobolev spaces and the analyticity of the Dirichlet–Neumann operator.
Used in Part I (Theorem 2.6 and the construction of the normal form) and in the Lipschitz estimates for the deterministic flow. These are prior results from Wu, Lannes, Alazard–Burq–Zuily, and Berti–Maspero–Ventura.
standard math Random Brouwer fixed point theorem (Bharucha-Reid–Mukherjea) applies to the random phase operator T.
Invoked in Theorem 5.3 to produce the measurable random fixed point φ*. The theorem is cited as [10, Theorem 10]; the conditions of continuity and measurability are verified in the text.
standard math Standard probability facts: conditional expectation properties, Gaussian/Rayleigh tail estimates, Chernoff bounds, and independence/factorization arguments.
Used throughout Part II, especially in Lemma 3.3, Lemma 4.3, and Theorem 5.3(c). These are foundational results in probability theory.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rogue waves and large deviations for 2D pure gravity deep water waves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/33ZOV2NW

@misc{pith2026251015159,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rogue waves and large deviations for 2D pure gravity deep water waves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/33ZOV2NW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.15159}
}

read the original abstract

Rogue waves are extreme ocean events characterized by the sudden formation of anomalously large crests, and remain an important subject of investigation in oceanography and mathematics. A central problem is to quantify the probability of their formation under random Gaussian sea initial data. In this work, we rigorously characterize the tail-probability for the formation of rogue waves of the pure gravity water wave equations in deep water, the most accurate quasilinear PDE modeling waves in open ocean. This large deviation result rigorously proves various conjectures from the oceanography literature in the weakly nonlinear regime. Moreover, the result holds up to the optimal timescales allowed by deterministic well-posedness theory. The proof shows that rogue waves most likely arise through "dispersive focusing", where phase quasi-synchronization produces constructive amplification of the water crest. The main difficulty in justifying this mechanism is propagating statistical information over such long timescales, which we overcome by combining normal forms and probabilistic methods. Unlike prior work, this novel approach does not require approximate solutions to be Gaussian. Our general method tracks the tail probability of solutions to Hamiltonian PDEs with an integrable normal form and random Gaussian initial data over very long times, even in the absence of (quasi-)invariant measures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

[5]

Berti, R

M. Berti, R. Feola, and F. Pusateri,Birkhoff normal form and long time existence for periodic gravity water waves, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76 (7), 1416–1494 (2023)

2023
[1]

Alazard, N

T. Alazard, N. Burq, and C. Zuily,On the Cauchy problem for gravity water waves. Invent. Math., 198, 71–163 (2014)

2014
[2]

Ardhuin, T

F. Ardhuin, T. Postec, M. Accensi, J. Piolle, G. Dodet, M. Passaro, M. De Carlo, R. Husson, G. Guitton, and F. Collard, Sizing the largest ocean waves using the SWOT mission, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122 (38) e2513381122 (2025)

2025
[3]

Berti, and J.-M

M. Berti, and J.-M. Delort,Almost Global Solutions of Capillary-gravity Water Waves Equations on the Circle. UMI Lecture Notes 2018, ISBN 978-3-319-99486-4

2018
[4]

Berti, R

M. Berti, R. Feola, and L. Franzoi,Quadratic life span of periodic gravity-capillary water waves, Water Waves 3(1), 85–115 (2021)

2021
[6]

Berti, A

M. Berti, A. Maspero, and F. Murgante,Local well posedness of the Euler-Korteweg equations onT d. J. Dyn. Diff. Equat. 33, 1475–1513 (2021)

2021
[7]

Berti, A

M. Berti, A. Maspero, and F. Murgante,Hamiltonian Birkhoff Normal Form for Gravity-Capillary Water Waves with Constant Vorticity: Almost Global Existence. Ann. PDE 10, 22 (2024)

2024
[8]

Berti, A

M. Berti, A. Maspero, and P. Ventura,On the analyticity of the Dirichlet-Neumann operator and Stokes waves, Rendiconti Lincei-Matematica e Applicazioni 33(3), 611–650 (2022)

2022

Show all 73 references

[9]

Bertola, and A

M. Bertola, and A. Tovbis,Universality for the focusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation at the gradient catastrophe point: rational breathers and poles of the tritronqu´ ee solution to Painlev´ e I, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 66 (5), 678–752 (2013)

2013
[10]

A. T. Bharucha-Reid,Fixed point theorems in probabilistic analysis, Bulletin of the AMS 82 (5), 641–657 (1976)

1976
[11]

Bilman, L

D. Bilman, L. Ling, and P. Miller,Extreme superposition: rogue waves of infinite order and the Painlev´ e-III hierarchy, Duke Math. J. 169 (4), 671–760 (2020)

2020
[12]

Bourgain,Periodic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation and invariant measures, Comm

J. Bourgain,Periodic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation and invariant measures, Comm. Math. Phys. 166, 1–26 (1994)

1994
[13]

Breunung, and B

T. Breunung, and B. Balachandran,Prediction of freak waves from buoy measurements.Sci Rep 14, 16048 (2024)

2024
[14]

M. G. Brown, and A. Jensen,Experiments on focusing unidirectional water waves, J. of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 106 (2001)

2001
[15]

Buckmaster, P

T. Buckmaster, P. Germain, Z. Hani, and J. Shatah,Onset of the wave turbulence description of the longtime behavior of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Invent. Math. 225 (3), 787–855 (2021)

2021
[16]

Chabchoub, N

A. Chabchoub, N. P. Hoffmann, and N. Akhmediev,Rogue wave observation in a water wave tank, Physical Review Letters, 106:204502 (2011)

2011
[17]

Chabchoub, N

A. Chabchoub, N. Hoffmann, M. Onorato, and N. Akhmediev,Super rogue waves: Observation of a higher-order breather in water waves, Physical Review X, 2:011015 (2012)

2012
[18]

of Physical Oceanography, 44, 2317–2335 (2014)

Christou, M., Ewans, K.Field measurements of rogue water waves, J. of Physical Oceanography, 44, 2317–2335 (2014)

2014
[19]

Craig, and D.P

W. Craig, and D.P. Nicholls,Travelling two and three dimensional capillary gravity water waves, SIAM J.Math. Anal. 32 (2), 323–359 (2000)

2000
[20]

Craig, and C

W. Craig, and C. Sulem,Numerical simulation of gravity waves, J. Comput. Phys., 108(1), 73–83 (1993)

1993
[21]

Craig, and P

W. Craig, and P. Worfolk,An integrable normal form for water waves in infinite depth, Phys. D 84(3-4), 513–531 (1995)

1995
[22]

Dematteis, T

G. Dematteis, T. Grafke, M. Onorato, and E. Vanden-Eijnden,Experimental Evidence of Hydrodynamic Instantons: The Universal Route to Rogue Waves, Phys. Rev. X 9 (4), 041057 (2019). REFERENCES 52

2019
[23]

Dematteis, T

G. Dematteis, T. Grafke, and E. Vanden-Eijnden,Rogue waves and large deviations in deep sea, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115 (5), 855–860 (2018)

2018
[24]

Deng, and Z

Y. Deng, and Z. Hani,Full derivation of the wave kinetic equation, Invent. Math. 233 (2), 543–724 (2023)

2023
[25]

Deng, and Z

Y. Deng, and Z. Hani,Propagation of chaos and higher order statistics in wave kinetic theory, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (online first), doi 10.4171/JEMS/1488

doi
[26]

Y. Deng, A. Ionescu, and F. Pusateri,On the wave turbulence theory of 2D gravity waves, I: deterministic energy estimates, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 78 (2), 211–322 (2025)

2025
[27]

Y. Deng, A. Ionescu, and F. Pusateri,On the wave turbulence theory of 2D gravity waves, II: propagation of randomness, arXiv:2504.14304 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[28]

Y. Deng, A. R. Nahmod, and H. Yue,Invariant Gibbs measures and global strong solutions for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations in dimension two, Annals of Mathematics 200 (2), 399–486 (2024)

2024
[29]

Y. Deng, A. R. Nahmod, and H. Yue,Random tensors, propagation of randomness, and nonlinear dispersive equations, Invent. math. 228, 539–686 (2022)

2022
[30]

Dyachenko, Y.V

A.I. Dyachenko, Y.V. Lvov, V.E. Zakharov,Five-wave interaction on the surface of deep fluid. Physica D,87, 233–261, (1995)

1995
[31]

Haver,Freak wave event at Draupner jacket January 1 1995(Report), Statoil, Tech

S. Haver,Freak wave event at Draupner jacket January 1 1995(Report), Statoil, Tech. Rep. PTT-KU-MA

1995
[32]

Dysthe, H

K. Dysthe, H. Krogstad, and P. Muller,Oceanic rogue waves, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 40, 287–310 (2008)

2008
[33]

A. I. Dyachenko, Y. V. Lvov, and V. E. Zakharov,Five-wave interaction on the surface of deep fluid, Physica D 87, 233–261 (1995)

1995
[34]

A. I. Dyachenko, and V. E. Zakharov,Modulation instability of Stokes wave→freak wave, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters, 81 (3), 255–259 (2005)

2005
[35]

Fedele, J

F. Fedele, J. Brennan, S. Ponce de Le´ on, J. Dudley, and F. Dias,Real world ocean rogue waves explained without the modulational instability, Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 21; 6:27715

2016
[36]

Fedele, C

F. Fedele, C. Lugni, and A. Chawla,The sinking of the el faro: predicting real world rogue waves during hurricane Joaquin, Scientific Reports 7, 11188 (2017)

2017
[37]

Garrido, R

M. Garrido, R. Grande, K. Kurianski, and G. Staffilani,Large Deviations Principle for the cubic NLS equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76 (12), 4087–4136 (2023)

2023
[38]

Gemmrich, and L

J. Gemmrich, and L. Cicon,Generation mechanism and prediction of an observed extreme rogue wave, Scientific Reports 12, 1718 (2022)

2022
[39]

Genovese, R

G. Genovese, R. Luc` a, and N. Tzvetkov,Transport of Gaussian measures with exponential cut-off for Hamiltonian PDEs, JAMA 150, 737–787 (2023)

2023
[40]

Grande,Resonant large deviations principle for the beating NLS equation, arXiv:2408.05791, to appear in SIAM J

R. Grande,Resonant large deviations principle for the beating NLS equation, arXiv:2408.05791, to appear in SIAM J. Math. Anal. (2024)

2024 arXiv
[41]

Grande, and Z

R. Grande, and Z. Hani,Rigorous derivation of damped-driven wave turbulence theory, preprint arXiv:2407.10711 (2024)

2024
[42]

H¨ afner, J

D. H¨ afner, J. Gemmrich, and M. Jochum,Real-world rogue wave probabilities, Scientific Reports 11, 10084 (2021)

2021
[43]

Harrop-Griffiths, M

B. Harrop-Griffiths, M. Ifrim, and D. Tataru,Finite depth gravity water waves in holomorphic coordinates, Ann. PDE 3, 4 (2017)

2017
[44]

Hasselmann,On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum Part 1

K. Hasselmann,On the non-linear energy transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum Part 1. General theory, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 12 (4), 481–500 (1962)

1962
[45]

Ifrim , and D

M. Ifrim , and D. TataruTwo-dimensional gravity water waves with constant vorticity I: Cubic lifespan, Anal. PDE 12(4), 903–967 (2019)

2019
[46]

Ionescu, and F

A. Ionescu, and F. Pusateri,Global solutions for the gravity water waves system in 2d. Invent. Math., 199(3), 653–804 (2015)

2015
[47]

Janson,Tail bounds for sums of geometric and exponential variables, Statistics & Probability Letters 135, 1–6 (2018)

S. Janson,Tail bounds for sums of geometric and exponential variables, Statistics & Probability Letters 135, 1–6 (2018)

2018
[48]

Janssen,Nonlinear four-wave interactions and freak waves, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 33 (4), 863–884 (2003)

P. Janssen,Nonlinear four-wave interactions and freak waves, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 33 (4), 863–884 (2003)

2003
[49]

Kharif, and E

C. Kharif, and E. Pelinovsky,Physical mechanisms of the rogue wave phenomenon, European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids, 22 (11), 603–634 (2003)

2003
[50]

Knobler, D

S. Knobler, D. Liberzon, and F. Fedele,Large waves and navigation hazards of the eastern mediterranean sea, Scientific Reports, 12 (10), 16511 (2022)

2022
[51]

Lannes,Well-posedness of the water-waves equations

D. Lannes,Well-posedness of the water-waves equations. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 18(3), 605–654 (2005)

2005
[52]

Lannes,The water waves problem: mathematical analysis and asymptotics, Math

D. Lannes,The water waves problem: mathematical analysis and asymptotics, Math. Surveys and Monographs 188 (2013)

2013
[53]

M. S. Longuet-Higgins,On the statistical distribution of the heights of sea waves, Journal of Marine Research 11 (1952)

1952
[54]

Maspero, and F

A. Maspero, and F. Murgante,One dimensional energy cascades in a fractional quasilinear NLS, arXiv:2408.01097 (2024)

2024
[55]

N. Mori, M. Onorato, and P. A. E. M. Janssen,On the estimation of the kurtosis in directional sea states for freak wave forecasting, Journal of Physical Oceanography 41, 1484–1497 (2011). REFERENCES 53

2011
[56]

Oh, and N

T. Oh, and N. Tzvetkov,Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for the cubic fourth order nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 169, 1121–1168 (2017)

2017
[57]

Onorato, A

M. Onorato, A. R. Osborne, and M. Serio,The nonlinear dynamics of rogue waves and holes in deep-water gravity wave trains, Physics Letters A 275 (10), 386–393 (2000)

2000
[58]

Onorato, S

M. Onorato, S. Residori, U. Bortolozzo, A. Montina, and F.T. Arecchi,Rogue waves and their generating mechanisms in different physical contexts, Phys. Rep. 528 (2), 47–89 (2013)

2013
[59]

D. H. Peregrine,Water waves, nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations and their solutions, The Journal of the Australian Math- ematical Society, Series B. Applied Mathematics, 25 (1983)

1983
[60]

B. J. Pettis,On integration in vector spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 44, 277–304 (1938)

1938
[61]

Planchon, N

F. Planchon, N. Tzvetkov, and N. Visciglia,Modified energies for the periodic generalized KdV equation and applications, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 40 , 863–917 (2023)

2023
[62]

S. I. Resnick,A probability path, Modern Birkhauser Classics, Birkhauser Boston, MA, 2013

2013
[63]

Shatah, and C

J. Shatah, and C. Zeng,Geometry and a priori estimates for free boundary problems of the Euler equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 61(5), 698–744 (2008)

2008
[64]

Staffilani, and M

G. Staffilani, and M. B. Tran,On the wave turbulence theory for a stochastic KdV type equation, arXiv:2106.09819 (2021)

2021 arXiv
[65]

Toffoli, et al.Observations of rogue seas in the Southern Ocean

A. Toffoli, et al.Observations of rogue seas in the Southern Ocean. Physical Review Letters, 132, 154101, 2024

2024
[66]

Totz, and S

N. Totz, and S. Wu,A rigorous justification of the modulation approximation to the 2d full water wave problem, Comm. Math. Phys. 310, 817–883 (2012)

2012
[67]

Tzvetkov,Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for one dimensional Hamiltonian PDEs, Forum Math

N. Tzvetkov,Quasi-invariant Gaussian measures for one dimensional Hamiltonian PDEs, Forum Math. Sigma 3 (2015)

2015
[68]

Wu,Well-posedness in Sobolev spaces of the full water wave problem in 2-D, Invent

S. Wu,Well-posedness in Sobolev spaces of the full water wave problem in 2-D, Invent. Math. 130(1), 39–72 (1997)

1997
[69]

Wu,The quartic integrability and long time existence of steep water waves in 2d, preprint arXiv:2010.09117 (2020)

S. Wu,The quartic integrability and long time existence of steep water waves in 2d, preprint arXiv:2010.09117 (2020)

2010 arXiv
[70]

V. E. Zakharov,Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid, Zhurnal Prikladnoi Mekhaniki i Teckhnicheskoi Fiziki 9 (2), 86–94 (1969)

1969
[71]

V. E. Zakharov,Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid, Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics 9, 190–194 (1972)

1972
[72]

V. E. Zakharov, and A. I. Dyachenko,Is free-surface hydrodynamics an integrable system?, Physics Letters A 190, 144–148 (1994)

1994
[73]

V. E. Zakharov, A. I. Dyachenko, and A. O. Prokofiev,Freak waves as nonlinear stage of Stokes wave modulation instability, European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids 25 (9), 677–692 (2006)

2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [5]

Berti, R

M. Berti, R. Feola, and F. Pusateri,Birkhoff normal form and long time existence for periodic gravity water waves, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 76 (7), 1416–1494 (2023)

2023

[2] [1]

Alazard, N

T. Alazard, N. Burq, and C. Zuily,On the Cauchy problem for gravity water waves. Invent. Math., 198, 71–163 (2014)

2014

[3] [2]

Ardhuin, T

F. Ardhuin, T. Postec, M. Accensi, J. Piolle, G. Dodet, M. Passaro, M. De Carlo, R. Husson, G. Guitton, and F. Collard, Sizing the largest ocean waves using the SWOT mission, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 122 (38) e2513381122 (2025)

2025

[4] [3]

Berti, and J.-M

M. Berti, and J.-M. Delort,Almost Global Solutions of Capillary-gravity Water Waves Equations on the Circle. UMI Lecture Notes 2018, ISBN 978-3-319-99486-4

2018

[5] [4]

Berti, R

M. Berti, R. Feola, and L. Franzoi,Quadratic life span of periodic gravity-capillary water waves, Water Waves 3(1), 85–115 (2021)

2021

[6] [6]

Berti, A

M. Berti, A. Maspero, and F. Murgante,Local well posedness of the Euler-Korteweg equations onT d. J. Dyn. Diff. Equat. 33, 1475–1513 (2021)

2021

[7] [7]

Berti, A

M. Berti, A. Maspero, and F. Murgante,Hamiltonian Birkhoff Normal Form for Gravity-Capillary Water Waves with Constant Vorticity: Almost Global Existence. Ann. PDE 10, 22 (2024)

2024

[8] [8]

Berti, A

M. Berti, A. Maspero, and P. Ventura,On the analyticity of the Dirichlet-Neumann operator and Stokes waves, Rendiconti Lincei-Matematica e Applicazioni 33(3), 611–650 (2022)

2022