pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.15205 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-17 · 💻 cs.CE · q-fin.CP

Toward Black Scholes for Prediction Markets: A Unified Kernel and Market Maker's Handbook

Shaw Dalen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 06:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CE q-fin.CP
keywords prediction marketslogit jump-diffusionrisk-neutral martingalebelief volatilitymarket makingstochastic kerneljump processesvolatility surface
0
0 comments X

The pith

A logit jump-diffusion kernel supplies the Black-Scholes analogue for prediction markets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to equip prediction markets with a standard stochastic model for the evolution of traded probabilities. It introduces a logit jump-diffusion process that treats the probability as a martingale under the risk-neutral measure. This exposes belief volatility and jumps as explicit risk factors that can be quoted and hedged. Readers would care because it offers market makers a practical way to manage belief risk as volumes grow around elections and macro events. Tests on synthetic paths and real data indicate lower short-horizon variance forecast errors than simpler baselines.

Core claim

The central claim is that the logit jump-diffusion with risk-neutral drift supplies an implied-volatility analogue for prediction markets. It treats the traded probability p_t as a Q-martingale, exposes belief volatility, jump intensity, and dependence as quotable risk factors, and supports a calibration pipeline that filters microstructure noise, separates diffusion from jumps via expectation-maximization, and yields a stable belief-volatility surface on which variance, correlation, corridor, and first-passage derivatives can be defined.

What carries the argument

The logit jump-diffusion kernel with enforced risk-neutral drift on the probability process, which separates continuous belief diffusion from discrete jumps to produce a usable volatility surface.

If this is right

  • Market makers gain tools to quote and hedge belief volatility and jump risks across events.
  • A coherent layer of variance, correlation, and first-passage instruments becomes definable on top of the kernel.
  • Calibration on real event data yields lower short-horizon belief-variance forecast error than diffusion-only or probability-space baselines.
  • Belief risk can be transferred across venues using a common set of risk factors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The kernel could support new traded products such as belief-volatility indices that let outside investors hedge political or economic uncertainty.
  • Extending the approach to linked events might quantify how belief shocks propagate between related markets during news releases.
  • Deployment on live platforms would test whether the martingale assumption produces consistent pricing when liquidity is high.

Load-bearing premise

The traded probability p_t can be treated as a martingale under the risk-neutral measure without creating persistent arbitrage.

What would settle it

Finding that the calibrated model produces higher out-of-sample short-horizon belief-variance errors than a diffusion-only baseline on real election data, or that enforcing the risk-neutral drift creates detectable mispricings in live trading.

read the original abstract

Prediction markets, such as Polymarket, aggregate dispersed information into tradable probabilities, but they still lack a unifying stochastic kernel comparable to the one options gained from Black-Scholes. As these markets scale with institutional participation, exchange integrations, and higher volumes around elections and macro prints, market makers face belief volatility, jump, and cross-event risks without standardized tools for quoting or hedging. We propose such a foundation: a logit jump-diffusion with risk-neutral drift that treats the traded probability p_t as a Q-martingale and exposes belief volatility, jump intensity, and dependence as quotable risk factors. On top, we build a calibration pipeline that filters microstructure noise, separates diffusion from jumps using expectation-maximization, enforces the risk-neutral drift, and yields a stable belief-volatility surface. We then define a coherent derivative layer (variance, correlation, corridor, and first-passage instruments) analogous to volatility and correlation products in option markets. In controlled experiments on synthetic risk-neutral paths and real event data, the model reduces short-horizon belief-variance forecast error relative to diffusion-only and probability-space baselines, supporting both causal calibration and economic interpretability. Conceptually, the logit jump-diffusion kernel supplies an implied-volatility analogue for prediction markets: a tractable, tradable language for quoting, hedging, and transferring belief risk across venues such as Polymarket.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a logit jump-diffusion kernel for prediction market probabilities p_t, enforcing a risk-neutral drift to treat p_t as a Q-martingale. It includes an EM-based calibration pipeline to separate diffusion volatility from jumps after filtering microstructure noise, a belief-volatility surface, and a derivative layer with variance, correlation, corridor, and first-passage instruments. Experiments on synthetic risk-neutral paths and real event data claim reduced short-horizon belief-variance forecast error relative to diffusion-only and probability-space baselines, positioning the kernel as an implied-volatility analogue for quoting and hedging belief risk.

Significance. If the construction and calibration are robust, the work supplies a tractable stochastic framework for prediction markets that could standardize risk quoting and hedging in growing venues such as Polymarket, analogous to the role of Black-Scholes in options. The explicit separation of diffusion and jumps plus the derivative instruments represent a concrete advance over existing diffusion-only models, with potential for cross-venue risk transfer.

major comments (2)
  1. The central modeling choice that p_t is exactly a Q-martingale (enforced via the risk-neutral drift term in the logit jump-diffusion) is load-bearing for both the EM separation of diffusion from jumps and the claim of recovering market quantities. The abstract states the assumption directly but supplies no no-arbitrage derivation or empirical test that the drift remains zero after microstructure-noise removal; if a risk or liquidity premium exists, the subsequent volatility surface and jump-intensity estimates become artifacts of the enforced zero-drift rather than recovered parameters.
  2. § on calibration pipeline: the EM step attributes residual variation to jumps only after the risk-neutral drift has been imposed. Without a reported sensitivity analysis or alternative calibration that relaxes the martingale constraint, it is unclear whether the reported reduction in short-horizon forecast error is robust to plausible deviations from the zero-drift assumption.
minor comments (2)
  1. The experimental section should report error bars, confidence intervals, and explicit data-exclusion rules for the real event data; the abstract mentions reduced forecast error but the current description leaves reproducibility details incomplete.
  2. Notation for the belief-volatility surface and the jump-size distribution should be introduced with a single consolidated table or equation block to improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on the modeling assumptions and calibration robustness. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central modeling choice that p_t is exactly a Q-martingale (enforced via the risk-neutral drift term in the logit jump-diffusion) is load-bearing for both the EM separation of diffusion from jumps and the claim of recovering market quantities. The abstract states the assumption directly but supplies no no-arbitrage derivation or empirical test that the drift remains zero after microstructure-noise removal; if a risk or liquidity premium exists, the subsequent volatility surface and jump-intensity estimates become artifacts of the enforced zero-drift rather than recovered parameters.

    Authors: The risk-neutral drift is imposed by construction so that the traded probability p_t remains a Q-martingale, which is required for arbitrage-free pricing of any derivative written on p_t. We will add a short subsection deriving this drift from the no-arbitrage condition that the market price of the binary claim must equal its risk-neutral expectation. Regarding an empirical test of zero drift after noise filtering, the current experiments impose the constraint rather than test it; we will therefore include a sensitivity exercise that estimates an unrestricted drift on the real-event data and reports the resulting changes to volatility surfaces and forecast errors. revision: partial

  2. Referee: § on calibration pipeline: the EM step attributes residual variation to jumps only after the risk-neutral drift has been imposed. Without a reported sensitivity analysis or alternative calibration that relaxes the martingale constraint, it is unclear whether the reported reduction in short-horizon forecast error is robust to plausible deviations from the zero-drift assumption.

    Authors: We agree that robustness to the martingale constraint should be checked. In the revised manuscript we will add a sensitivity analysis that re-runs the full calibration and forecasting pipeline while allowing a small constant drift term. The results will be reported alongside the baseline to show whether the short-horizon forecast improvement persists under mild departures from strict zero drift. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper defines a logit jump-diffusion kernel that incorporates a risk-neutral drift term to enforce the Q-martingale property on the traded probability p_t, drawing this modeling choice from standard no-arbitrage finance theory rather than deriving it from the model's own outputs. The calibration pipeline applies expectation-maximization to separate diffusion and jumps while enforcing the drift, but this is a conventional parameter-fitting procedure for jump-diffusion processes and does not reduce the resulting volatility surface or derivative instruments to the inputs by construction. Experiments on both synthetic risk-neutral paths and real event data supply independent validation of forecast error reduction, with no evidence of self-citations, smuggled ansatzes, or fitted parameters being relabeled as novel predictions. The central claim of supplying an implied-volatility analogue therefore retains independent content beyond its assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard stochastic assumptions plus new fitted elements for volatility and jumps; no machine-checked proofs or shipped code mentioned.

free parameters (2)
  • belief volatility surface
    Calibrated parameters defining the volatility of belief changes across events and horizons.
  • jump intensity and size distribution
    Parameters estimated via expectation-maximization to capture discontinuous belief updates.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Traded probability p_t is a Q-martingale
    Invoked in the abstract to justify risk-neutral drift and hedging framework.
invented entities (1)
  • logit jump-diffusion kernel no independent evidence
    purpose: Unified stochastic process for belief dynamics in prediction markets
    Newly proposed framework combining logit space, jumps, and risk-neutral measure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5769 in / 1299 out tokens · 54811 ms · 2026-05-18T06:53:39.797350+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. What Happens When Institutional Liquidity Enters Prediction Markets: Identification, Measurement, and a Synthetic Proof of Concept

    cs.CE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper develops a market-quality measurement framework for institutional liquidity in prediction markets and uses synthetic simulations to show that liquidity improvements do not benefit all traders equally, with l...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Event contracts.Federal Register, 89(112), June 2024. U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission rulemaking notice

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Efficient market making via convex optimization, and a connection to online learning.ACM Trans

    Jacob Abernethy, Yiling Chen, and Jennifer Wortman Vaughan. Efficient market making via convex optimization, and a connection to online learning.ACM Trans. Economics and Computation, 2013

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    The Jacobi Stochastic Volatility Model

    Damien Ackerer, Damir Filipovi´ c, and Sergio Pulido. The jacobi stochastic volatility model.arXiv:1605.07099, 2016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Uniswap v2 core whitepaper

    Hayden Adams, Noah Zinsmeister, and Dan Robinson. Uniswap v2 core whitepaper. https://app.uniswap.org/whitepaper.pdf, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Mykland, and Lan Zhang

    Yacine A¨ ıt-Sahalia, Per A. Mykland, and Lan Zhang. Ultra high frequency volatility estimation with dependent microstructure noise. Technical report, NBER Working Paper 11380, 2005

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    An evaluation of 2016 election polls in the u.s., 2017

    American Association for Public Opinion Research. An evaluation of 2016 election polls in the u.s., 2017

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Improved price oracles: Constant function market makers.arXiv:2003.10001, 2020

    Guillermo Angeris and Tarun Chitra. Improved price oracles: Constant function market makers.arXiv:2003.10001, 2020

    work page arXiv 2003

  8. [8]

    The geometry of constant function market makers

    Guillermo Angeris, Tarun Chitra, Theo Diamandis, Alex Evans, and Kshitij Kulkarni. The geometry of constant function market makers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08066, 2023. 21

    work page arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    An analysis of uniswap markets

    Guillermo Angeris, Hsien-Tang Kao, Rei Chiang, Charlie Noyes, and Tarun Chitra. An analysis of uniswap markets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.03380, 2019

    work page arXiv 1911

  10. [10]

    Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2009

    David Applebaum.L´ evy Processes and Stochastic Calculus. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2009

    work page 2009

  11. [11]

    Arrow, Robert Forsythe, Michael Gorham, Robert Hahn, Robin Hanson, John O

    Kenneth J. Arrow, Robert Forsythe, Michael Gorham, Robert Hahn, Robin Hanson, John O. Ledyard, Saul Levmore, Robert Litan, Paul Milgrom, Forrest D. Nelson, George R. Neumann, Marco Ottaviani, Thomas C. Schelling, Robert J. Shiller, Ver- non L. Smith, Erik Snowberg, Cass R. Sunstein, Philip E. Tetlock, Hal R. Varian, Justin Wolfers, and Eric Zitzewitz. The...

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    Bandi and Thong H

    Federico M. Bandi and Thong H. Nguyen. On the functional estimation of jump–diffusions.Working paper version 2001; later publications, 2001

    work page 2001

  13. [13]

    Likelihood Evaluation of Jump-Diffusion Models Using Deterministic Nonlinear Filters

    Jean-Fran¸ cois B´ egin and Mathieu Boudreault. Likelihood evaluation of jump–diffusion models using deterministic nonlinear filters.arXiv:1906.04322, 2019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  14. [14]

    Decentralized exchanges: The profitability frontier of constant product market makers

    Tobias Bitterli and Fabian Sch¨ ar. Decentralized exchanges: The profitability frontier of constant product market makers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.05219, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    The pricing of options and corporate liabilities

    Fischer Black and Myron Scholes. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 1973

    work page 1973

  16. [16]

    Polymarket discloses past funding rounds totaling$205 million before $2 billion ice investment

    The Block. Polymarket discloses past funding rounds totaling$205 million before $2 billion ice investment. October 2025

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    The effect of jumps and discrete sampling on volatil- ity and variance swaps.International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 11(01):1–20, 2008

    Mark Broadie and Ashish Jain. The effect of jumps and discrete sampling on volatil- ity and variance swaps.International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 11(01):1–20, 2008

    work page 2008

  18. [18]

    Pricing and hedging volatility derivatives

    Mark Broadie and Ashish Jain. Pricing and hedging volatility derivatives. Technical report, Columbia Business School, 2008

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    Information-Based Asset Pricing

    Dorje C. Brody, Lane P. Hughston, and Andrea Macrina. Information-based asset pricing.arXiv:0704.1976, 2007

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1976

  20. [20]

    Efficient pricing and super replication of corridor variance swaps

    Christoph Burgard. Efficient pricing and super replication of corridor variance swaps. Technical report, SSRN Working Paper, 2017

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Pricing options on realized variance.Finance and Stochas- tics, 9(4):453–475, 2004

    Peter Carr and Roger Lee. Pricing options on realized variance.Finance and Stochas- tics, 9(4):453–475, 2004

    work page 2004

  22. [22]

    Volatility derivatives.Annual Review of Financial Eco- nomics, 1:319–339, 2009

    Peter Carr and Roger Lee. Volatility derivatives.Annual Review of Financial Eco- nomics, 1:319–339, 2009

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    Yiling Chen and David M. Pennock. A utility framework for bounded-loss market makers.arXiv:1206.5252, 2012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  24. [24]

    Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2004

    Rama Cont and Peter Tankov.Financial Modelling with Jump Processes. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2004. 22

    work page 2004

  25. [25]

    Corporate prediction markets: Evidence from google, ford, and firm x

    Bo Cowgill, Eric Zitzewitz, et al. Corporate prediction markets: Evidence from google, ford, and firm x. Technical report, Working paper, 2015

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Kalshi prediction markets are pulling in$1 billion monthly as state regu- lators loom

    Decrypt. Kalshi prediction markets are pulling in$1 billion monthly as state regu- lators loom. September 2025. Cites Dune dashboard; Accessed Oct. 9, 2025

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    ‘golden age’ of prediction markets dawns as activity reaches new highs, October 2025

    The Defiant. ‘golden age’ of prediction markets dawns as activity reaches new highs, October 2025. Summarizes Dune/DeFiLlama data: Polymarket∼$1.43B; Kalshi ∼$3B in Sept. 2025

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    A guide to volatility and variance swaps.The Journal of Derivatives, 6(4):9–32, 1999

    Kresimir Demeterfi, Emanuel Derman, Michael Kamal, and Joseph Zou. A guide to volatility and variance swaps.The Journal of Derivatives, 6(4):9–32, 1999

    work page 1999

  29. [29]

    Pricing with a smile.Risk, 1994

    Bruno Dupire. Pricing with a smile.Risk, 1994

    work page 1994

  30. [30]

    A microstructure estimate of realized volatility

    Robert Engle and Zheng Sun. A microstructure estimate of realized volatility. Tech- nical report, NYU Stern, 2006

    work page 2006

  31. [31]

    Wiley, 2006

    Jim Gatheral.The Volatility Surface: A Practitioner’s Guide. Wiley, 2006

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    Glosten and Paul R

    Lawrence R. Glosten and Paul R. Milgrom. Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders.Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1):71–100, 1985

    work page 1985

  33. [33]

    Gould, Mason A

    Martin D. Gould, Mason A. Porter, Stacy Williams, Mark McDonald, Daniel Fenn, and Sam Howison. Limit order books.Quantitative Finance, 2013

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    Pentagon drops bid for futures market.The Washington Post, July 2003

    Bradley Graham and Vernon Loeb. Pentagon drops bid for futures market.The Washington Post, July 2003

    work page 2003

  35. [35]

    Logarithmic market scoring rules for modular combinatorial infor- mation aggregation.https://hanson.gmu.edu/mktscore.pdf, 2003

    Robin Hanson. Logarithmic market scoring rules for modular combinatorial infor- mation aggregation.https://hanson.gmu.edu/mktscore.pdf, 2003

    work page 2003

  36. [36]

    The policy analysis market (pam): A thwarted experiment in the use of prediction markets for public policy.Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2(3):73–88, 2007

    Robin Hanson. The policy analysis market (pam): A thwarted experiment in the use of prediction markets for public policy.Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 2(3):73–88, 2007

    work page 2007

  37. [37]

    Measuring the information content of stock trades.Journal of Finance, 1991

    Joel Hasbrouck. Measuring the information content of stock trades.Journal of Finance, 1991

    work page 1991

  38. [38]

    Oxford University Press, 2007

    Joel Hasbrouck.Empirical Market Microstructure: The Institutions, Economics, and Econometrics of Securities Trading. Oxford University Press, 2007

    work page 2007

  39. [39]

    F. A. Hayek. The use of knowledge in society.American Economic Review, 35(4):519–530, 1945

    work page 1945

  40. [40]

    Steven L. Heston. A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility.Re- view of Financial Studies, 1993

    work page 1993

  41. [41]

    Ice announces strategic investment in polymarket

    Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. Ice announces strategic investment in polymarket. Press release, October 2025. Accessed Oct. 9, 2025

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Testing for common arrivals of jumps for discretely observed multidimensional processes.Annals of Statistics, 2009

    Jean Jacod and Viktor Todorov. Testing for common arrivals of jumps for discretely observed multidimensional processes.Annals of Statistics, 2009. 23

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    Jenkins and Dario Span` o

    Paul A. Jenkins and Dario Span` o. Exact simulation of the wright–fisher diffusion. Annals of Applied Probability, 2017

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Kalshiex llc v

    Justia. Kalshiex llc v. cftc, no. 24-5205 (d.c. cir. 2024), October 2024. Accessed Oct. 9, 2025

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    S. G. Kou. A jump-diffusion model for option pricing.Management Science, 2002

    work page 2002

  46. [46]

    Albert S. Kyle. Continuous auctions and insider trading.Econometrica, 53(6):1315– 1335, 1985

    work page 1985

  47. [47]

    Corridor variance swap, 2008

    Roger Lee. Corridor variance swap, 2008

    work page 2008

  48. [48]

    Charles F. Manski. Interpreting the predictions of prediction markets. NBER Work- ing Paper 10359, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2004

    work page 2004

  49. [49]

    Robert C. Merton. Theory of rational option pricing.The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(1):141–183, 1973

    work page 1973

  50. [50]

    Robert C. Merton. Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976

    work page 1976

  51. [51]

    Universitext

    Bernt Øksendal and Agn` es Sulem.Applied Stochastic Control of Jump Diffusions. Universitext. Springer, 2005

    work page 2005

  52. [52]

    A prac- tical liquidity-sensitive automated market maker

    Abraham Othman, Tuomas Sandholm, David Pennock, and Daniel Reeves. A prac- tical liquidity-sensitive automated market maker. InEC, 2010

    work page 2010

  53. [53]

    Polymarket gets big investment from new york stock exchange parent company.Axios, October 2025

    Dan Primack and Miriam McCracken. Polymarket gets big investment from new york stock exchange parent company.Axios, October 2025

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Sports trading pushes kalshi past all-time volume records

    Legal Sports Report. Sports trading pushes kalshi past all-time volume records. September 2025. Reports>$2.4B sports volume in Sept. 2025; Accessed Oct. 9, 2025

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Nyse owner takes$2 billion stake in polymarket as prediction markets go mainstream

    Reuters. Nyse owner takes$2 billion stake in polymarket as prediction markets go mainstream. October 2025. Accessed Oct. 9, 2025

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Prediction markets for economic forecasting

    Erik Snowberg, Justin Wolfers, and Eric Zitzewitz. Prediction markets for economic forecasting. InBrookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2012. Working chapter version

    work page 2012

  57. [57]

    Nyse parent to invest up to$2bn in prediction platform polymarket

    Financial Times. Nyse parent to invest up to$2bn in prediction platform polymarket. Financial Times, October 2025. Accessed Oct. 9, 2025

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    United States Code. 7 u.s. code s 13-1: Onion futures act (1958), 1958

    work page 1958

  59. [59]

    Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Cftc issues proposal on event con- tracts. Press Release No. 8907-24, May 2024. Defines certain political-event contracts as gaming; Accessed Oct. 9, 2025

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Contracts & products: Event con- tracts, 2024. 24

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Event contracts (notice of proposed rulemaking). Federal Register, 89(112), June 2024. RIN 3038–AF14; Accessed Oct. 9, 2025

    work page 2024

  62. [62]

    Prediction markets.Journal of Economic Per- spectives, 18(2):107–126, 2004

    Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz. Prediction markets.Journal of Economic Per- spectives, 18(2):107–126, 2004

    work page 2004

  63. [63]

    Interpreting prediction market prices as proba- bilities

    Justin Wolfers and Eric Zitzewitz. Interpreting prediction market prices as proba- bilities. NBER Working Paper 12200, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2006. 25

    work page 2006