pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.15856 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Latch, Spring and Release: The Efficiency of Power-Amplified Jumping

Marc Su\~n\'e , Lucas Selva , Crist\'obal Arratia , John S. Wettlaufer , Dominic Vella This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 05:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords power amplificationLaMSA jumpingadhesion latchelastic deformationrelease dynamicsjump efficiencyspring actuationinsect locomotion
0
0 comments X

The pith

The rate at which adhesion is lost determines whether and how efficiently power-amplified jumps occur.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper models power-amplified jumping in small animals that use springs and latches to overcome muscle power limits. It examines an external latch created by adhesion to a substrate that must be released quickly for takeoff. The central result is that the speed of adhesion loss during release interacts with the jumper's elastic recoil to control energy transfer. Only certain release rates allow efficient conversion of stored elastic energy into kinetic motion; others prevent jumping altogether. The analysis shows how release timing provides a control mechanism after the latch opens.

Core claim

In adhesion-latched spring-actuated jumpers, the temporal profile of adhesive force decay couples to the elastic deformation of the jumper such that only release rates within a specific window permit efficient energy transfer to kinetic motion; outside this window the system either fails to jump or achieves low efficiency because the release dynamics no longer match the recoil timescale.

What carries the argument

The coupling between the time-dependent loss of adhesive force and the jumper's elastic deformation during the release phase.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes a particular functional form for the decay of adhesive force over time and its coupling to elastic deformation that creates an optimal release window.

What would settle it

Varying the controlled rate of adhesion loss in an experimental model jumper and measuring takeoff success or jump height as a function of that rate would show whether efficiency peaks inside a predicted window.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.15856 by Crist\'obal Arratia, Dominic Vella, John S. Wettlaufer, Lucas Selva, Marc Su\~n\'e.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Release rate control of externally-latched jumping. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Phase diagram of the jumping behavior of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Energy efficiency of jumping of a curved shell given by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Many small animals, particularly insects, use power-amplification to generate rapid motions, such as jumping, that would otherwise be impossible given the standard power density of muscle. A common framework for understanding this power amplification is Latch-Mediated, Spring Actuated (or LaMSA) jumping, in which a spring is slowly compressed, latched in its compressed state and the latch released to allow jumping. Motivated by the jumps of certain insect larvae, we consider an external latching mechanism via adhesion to a substrate that is quickly released for jumping. We show that the rate at which this adhesion is lost is crucial in determining the efficiency of jumping and, indeed, whether jumping occurs at all. As well as showing how release rate should be chosen to facilitate optimal jumping, our analysis underscores the importance of the interaction between latch-release dynamics and the elastic deformation of the jumper for power amplification, thereby providing new insight into post-latch jumping control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical model for latch-mediated spring-actuated (LaMSA) jumping using an external adhesive latch to a substrate that is released at a controlled rate. Motivated by insect larvae, it claims that the rate at which adhesion is lost is crucial in determining both the efficiency of jumping and whether a jump occurs at all, by analyzing the interaction between latch-release dynamics and the jumper's elastic deformation. The work provides guidance on selecting the release rate for optimal performance and emphasizes post-latch control in power amplification.

Significance. If the central result holds, the paper contributes new insight into the mechanics of power-amplified jumping by showing how release-rate dynamics couple to elastic energy transfer in LaMSA systems. This extends existing frameworks beyond internal latching and could guide both biological interpretation of insect jumping strategies and the design of bio-inspired actuators. The forward-modeling approach (rather than parameter fitting to observed jumps) keeps circularity low, as noted in the reader's assessment.

major comments (1)
  1. [Model formulation and governing equations (likely §2–3)] The claim that adhesion-loss rate controls both efficiency and the binary outcome of jump vs. no-jump (abstract and §1) is load-bearing and depends on the specific functional form chosen for the time-dependent adhesive force F_adh(t) and its coupling to the elastic deformation in the governing ODEs (presumably of the form mẍ = kx − F_adh(t) or equivalent). The stress-test note correctly identifies that if this form (linear ramp, exponential, or sigmoidal) is selected to produce an optimum rather than derived from measured adhesion kinetics or first-principles contact mechanics, the reported sensitivity may be an artifact. Please state the exact form used, justify its choice, and demonstrate that the qualitative result is robust under at least one alternative physically motivated form.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'our analysis underscores the importance...' but provides no indication of the key equations, nondimensional parameters, or numerical methods; a single sentence summarizing the model type would improve clarity for readers.
  2. [Throughout (e.g., §2)] Notation for the adhesive force and release-rate parameter should be introduced consistently in the first appearance in the main text to avoid ambiguity when comparing slow vs. fast release regimes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity of our manuscript. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model formulation and governing equations (likely §2–3)] The claim that adhesion-loss rate controls both efficiency and the binary outcome of jump vs. no-jump (abstract and §1) is load-bearing and depends on the specific functional form chosen for the time-dependent adhesive force F_adh(t) and its coupling to the elastic deformation in the governing ODEs (presumably of the form mẍ = kx − F_adh(t) or equivalent). The stress-test note correctly identifies that if this form (linear ramp, exponential, or sigmoidal) is selected to produce an optimum rather than derived from measured adhesion kinetics or first-principles contact mechanics, the reported sensitivity may be an artifact. Please state the exact form used, justify its choice, and demonstrate that the qualitative result is robust under at least one alternative physically motivated form.

    Authors: In §2 of the manuscript, the adhesive force is taken to decrease linearly with time as F_adh(t) = F_max (1 - t/τ_release) for 0 ≤ t ≤ τ_release, and F_adh(t) = 0 for t > τ_release. This functional form is chosen because it provides a direct and controllable parameter (the release time τ_release) for the rate of adhesion loss, allowing us to systematically explore its effect on jumping performance without additional complexity. It is a phenomenological model inspired by the ability of the larvae to control the detachment process. The governing equation is m d²x/dt² = k x - F_adh(t), with x(0) = -δ (compressed spring) and initial velocity zero. We acknowledge that this is not derived from first-principles contact mechanics, but rather as a model for controlled release. To demonstrate robustness, we have verified that using an exponential form F_adh(t) = F_max exp(-t/τ_release) yields qualitatively similar results: there exists an optimal release rate for efficiency, and sufficiently slow release prevents jumping due to energy dissipation. We will add a new subsection or paragraph in the revised manuscript explicitly stating the form, its justification, and the results of the robustness test with the exponential decay. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; forward model derives sensitivity to release rate from ODE integration

full rationale

The paper constructs a dynamical model with an assumed time-dependent adhesive force F_adh(t) as an explicit input parameter, then integrates the governing equations (mass-spring with time-varying adhesion) to obtain jumping efficiency as a function of release rate. This is a standard parametric study: the functional form and its coupling to deformation are chosen upfront, and the reported dependence of efficiency (and binary jump/no-jump outcome) on decay rate emerges from solving the ODEs rather than being imposed by redefinition or by fitting to the target result. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or an ansatz that is smuggled in to force the conclusion. The derivation remains self-contained and falsifiable by changing the assumed F_adh(t) form or by external measurement of adhesion kinetics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on modeling assumptions about adhesion loss dynamics and elastic coupling; no free parameters or invented entities are stated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Adhesive force decreases at a controllable rate that interacts with elastic deformation of the jumper.
    Invoked to link release timing to jump efficiency.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5711 in / 1058 out tokens · 38490 ms · 2026-05-18T05:49:18.976563+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Galantis and R

    A. Galantis and R. C. Woledge, The theoretical limits to the power output of a muscle–tendon complex with inertial and gravitational loads, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 1493 (2003)

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Forterre, J

    Y. Forterre, J. M. Skotheim, J. Dumais, and L. Ma- hadevan, How the Venus flytrap snaps, Nature 433, 421 (2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    Bolmin, J

    O. Bolmin, J. J. Socha, M. Alleyne, A. C. Dunn, K. Fez- zaa, and A. A. Wissa, Nonlinear elasticity and damp- ing govern ultrafast dynamics in click beetles, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2014569118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Ilton, M

    M. Ilton, M. S. Bhamla, X. Ma, S. M. Cox, L. L. Fitch- ett, Y. Kim, J.-s. Koh, D. Krishnamurthy, C.-Y. Kuo, F. Z. Temel, A. J. Crosby, M. Prakash, G. P. Sutton, R. J. Wood, E. Azizi, S. Bergbreiter, and S. N. Patek, The principles of cascading power limits in small, fast bi- ological and engineered systems, Science 360, eaao1082 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Yang and H.-Y

    E. Yang and H.-Y. Kim, Jumping hoops, Am. J. Phys. 80, 19 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Y. Wang, Q. Wang, M. Liu, Y. Qin, L. Cheng, O. Bolmin, M. Alleyne, A. Wissa, R. H. Baughman, D. Vella, and S. Tawfick, Insect-scale jumping robots enabled by a dy- namic buckling cascade, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2210651120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    M. A. Bertone, J. C. Gibson, A. E. Seago, T. Yoshida, 6 and A. A. Smith, A novel power-amplified jumping be- havior in larval beetles (coleoptera: Laemophloeidae), PLOS One 17, e0256509 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Howell, G

    P. Howell, G. Kozyreff, and J. Ockendon, Applied Solid Mechanics, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, 2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Yoshida and H

    K. Yoshida and H. Wada, Mechanics of a snap fit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 194301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    R. G. Cox, The motion of long slender bodies in a viscous fluid part 1. general theory, J. Fluid Mech. 44, 791–810 (1970)

    work page 1970

  11. [11]

    T. A. Driscoll, N. Hale, and L. N. Trefethen, eds., Cheb- fun Guide (Pafnuty Publications, 2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    D. B. Zurek, S. N. Gorb, and D. Voigt, Locomotion and attachment of leaf beetle larvae Gastrophysa viridula (coleoptera, chrysomelidae), Interf. Focus 5, 20140055 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    A. C. Callan-Jones, P. T. Brun, and B. Audoly, Self- similar curling of a naturally curved elastica, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 174302 (2012)

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    S. Divi, X. Ma, M. Ilton, R. St. Pierre, B. Eslami, S. N. Patek, and S. Bergbreiter, Latch-based control of energy output in spring actuated systems, J. R. Soc. Interface 17, 20200070 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Latch, Spring and Release: The Efficiency of Power-Amplified Jumping

    S. Divi, R. St. Pierre, H. M. Foong, and S. Bergbre- iter, Controlling jumps through latches in small jumping robots, Bioinspir. Biomim. 18, 066003 (2023). Supplementary Information for “Latch, Spring and Release: The Efficiency of Power-Amplified Jumping” Marc Su˜ n´ e, Lucas Selva, Crist´ obal Arratia, John Wettlaufer, and Dominic Vella In this Supplementa...

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    We consider the system’s generalized coordinates q = (x, z, θ )

    Variational principle The equations describing the evolution of the shell’s shape can be de rived from a variational principle [1]. We consider the system’s generalized coordinates q = (x, z, θ ). We seek to minimize the action S[q] = ∫ t2 t1 dt L ( q, ˙q(t), t ) , with t denoting time, dots denoting differentiation with respect to t, and L ( q, ˙q(t), t )...

    work page

  17. [17]

    (S6,S7,S8)

    Dissipation To model the jumping behavior of slender elastic shells we intro duce dissipation into eqs. (S6,S7,S8). The shell is confined in the xz-plane and hence has three degrees of freedom: rotations about an axis perpe ndicular to the plane, and translations along the x, z directions. By virtue of the small-slope approximation — that we will introduce...

    work page

  18. [18]

    To denote dimensionless versions of the variables in our model we use upper case versions of the symbols us ed to denote the corresponding dimensional quantity, e.g

    Scaling and slender-body approximation ( h/ℓ ≪ 1) We nondimensionalize lengths by ℓ, heights by ℓ2|κ 0|, masses by ρhℓ2, times by ( ρhℓ4/EI )1/ 2, horizontal forces (per unit width) by EI/ℓ 2 and vertical forces (per unit width) by EI |κ 0|/ℓ . To denote dimensionless versions of the variables in our model we use upper case versions of the symbols us ed t...

    work page

  19. [19]

    (S10), by assuming that al l angles are small, i.e

    Small-slope approximation: linearization We linearize the balance of angular momentum, eq. (S10), by assuming that al l angles are small, i.e. θ ≈ ℓ|κ 0|∂Z/∂X ≪ 1. We may then approximate cos θ ≈ 1, sin θ ≈ tan θ = ℓ|κ 0|∂Z/∂X , ∂S ≈ ∂X etc.) We also assume that κ 0ℓ ≪ 1 so that the cylindrical cap is shallow and hence that the edges lie at X = 0 , 1 — th...

    work page

  20. [20]

    Linearized model Assuming small deflections, the equilibrium shape of the shell whe n the latch is applied (see fig. S2) is denoted by Z0(X) and satisfies a fourth order boundary-value problem d4Z0 dX 4 + 1 β = 0, (S26) with boundary conditions d 2Z0/ d2X(X = 0 , 1) = κ 0/ |κ 0| and Z0(X = 0 , 1) = 0; the latching constraint is Z0(X = 1/ 2) = 0, but the forc...

    work page

  21. [21]

    (S10), (S11), and (S12) with boundary conditions by eq

    Non-linear model We complete this section with an analytic solution to the equilibriu m, fully non-linear model eqs. (S10), (S11), and (S12) with boundary conditions by eq. (S13). Substituting Λ X = 0 (this result follows from the boundary conditions, Λ X (S)|S=0, 1 = 0, combined with the equation dΛ X dS = 0, eq. (S11) in equilibrium) into the equilibriu...

    work page

  22. [22]

    For Hτ > 1, the solution is given by eq

    Slow release ( Hτ ≥ 1) We include for completeness the analytic results of the dynamic beam equation (S17) when the unlatching timescale τ is larger than the damping timescale H − 1 — yet H < 2π 2 and hence all modes are oscillating. For Hτ > 1, the solution is given by eq. (S39) with w(X) from eq. (S40) and ζ(X, T ) from eq. (S45) (with the same constant...

    work page

  23. [23]

    S3 numerically, we now se ek an asymptotic approximation of the force at the origin eq

    Asymptotic expressions of the phase boundary Having computed the phase boundaries in fig. S3 numerically, we now se ek an asymptotic approximation of the force at the origin eq. (S53) that will allow us to determine asymptotic results for the phase boundary and βcrit, which is the minimal β needed for jumping. 11 We start by considering the asymptotic limi...

    work page

  24. [24]

    [7], see fig

    Parameter Values We measured the radius of curvature of the larval beetles by fitting a c ircle to their bodies in the video from Bertone et al. [7], see fig. S5. We calculate an estimated radius of approximately 0 . 6 mm ( |κ max 0 | ≈ 1. 69 mm − 1). From these videos, we also measure a curling time scale tcurl ≈ 44 ms. We then estimate the bending stiffnes...

    work page

  25. [25]

    3 in the main text, with dimensions as per the results in the previous section)

    Stored Energy To examine in the main text the attaching force of the larval beetles (s ee fig. 3 in the main text, with dimensions as per the results in the previous section). We complement this ex ploration with the analysis of the stored energy (gravitational+bending) by the larval beetles as a function of the curv ature. We plot the results using the li...

    work page

  26. [26]

    (All notations involved in these expressions are defined in §S2 A 2.) E

    5 [ 1 2 Θ( S − SR 0 ) ( dθ+ R dS − ℓκ0 )2 + 1 2 Θ( − S + SR 0 ) ( dθ− R dS − ℓκ0 )2] dS (where Θ( x) is the Heaviside step function); and Z L, nonlinear 0 (S, θ 0, S L 0 , Λ L Z, ℓ, κ 0) ≡ ∫ 1 0 dS sin θ = 1 ℓ|κ 0|Λ L Z [ √ ∆ L ( E (π − 2θ0 4 , k L ) − Θ( − S + SL 0 ) E ( π − 2θ + L (S) 4 , k L ) + Θ( S − SL 0 ) ( E ( π − 2θ + L (S) 4 , k L ) − 2E ( π − 2...

    work page

  27. [27]

    Audoly and Y

    B. Audoly and Y. Pomeau, Elasticity and Geometry: From Hair Curls to the Non-linear R esponse of Shells (OUP Oxford, 2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    R. G. Cox, The motion of long slender bodies in a viscous flu id part 1. general theory, J. Fluid Mech. 44, 791–810 (1970)

    work page 1970

  29. [29]

    G. K. Batchelor, Slender-body theory for particles of arbitrary c ross-section in Stokes flow, J. Fluid Mech. 44, 419–440 (1970)

    work page 1970

  30. [30]

    Howell, G

    P. Howell, G. Kozyreff, and J. Ockendon, Applied Solid Mechanics , Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, 2008)

    work page 2008

  31. [31]

    T. J. W. Wagner and D. Vella, The ‘sticky elastica’: delami nation blisters beyond small deformations, Soft Matter 9, 1025 (2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [32]

    T. A. Driscoll, N. Hale, and L. N. Trefethen, eds., Chebfun Guide (Pafnuty Publications, 2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    M. A. Bertone, J. C. Gibson, A. E. Seago, T. Yoshida, and A. A . Smith, A novel power-amplified jumping behavior in larval beetles (coleoptera: Laemophloeidae), PLOS One 17, e0256509 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    A. C. Callan-Jones, P. T. Brun, and B. Audoly, Self-similar curling of a naturally curved elastica, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 174302 (2012). 17 FIG. S8. Fitting the amplitude a(t) in the experiments with the fundamental mode of the linearized theory

    work page 2012