pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.17258 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Real space decay of flat band projectors from compact localized states

Yeongjun Kim , Sergej Flach , Alexei Andreanov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 06:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords flat bandscompact localized statesprojector decaylocalization lengthsingular bandsquantum metriccondensed matter
0
0 comments X

The pith

Flat band projectors decay exponentially or as power laws in different limits

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes the real-space decay of projectors onto flat bands that possess compact localized states. The states are grouped into orthogonal, linearly independent and singular categories according to their algebraic relations, and a continuous tuning parameter connects the categories. For linearly independent cases the projector decays exponentially with a tunable localization length dressed by an algebraic prefactor whose form depends on dimension and band number. Orthogonal tuning makes the projector strictly compact while singular tuning replaces the exponential with a power-law decay. These decay properties are shown to be relevant for the flat band quantum metric in superconductivity contexts as well as for disorder and local driving effects.

Core claim

We derive the asymptotic real space decay of the flat band projectors for each category. The linearly independent FB is characterized by an exponentially decaying projector and a corresponding localization length ξ, all dressed by an algebraic prefactor. In the orthogonal limit, the localization length is ξ=0, and the projector is compact. The singular FB limit corresponds to ξ → ∞ with an emerging power law decay of the projector. We obtain analytical estimates for the localization length and the algebraic power law exponents depending on the dimension of the lattice and the number of bands involved.

What carries the argument

A parametrization of the compact localized states that continuously tunes the flat band between the orthogonal, linearly independent and singular categories, which in turn fixes the decay class of the projector.

If this is right

  • Analytical formulas exist for the localization length ξ in terms of lattice dimension and number of bands.
  • The power-law exponents in the decay are determined by the same parameters.
  • The projector decay influences the flat band quantum metric discussed in superconductivity.
  • Disorder and local driving responses depend on whether the decay is compact, exponential or power-law.
  • Numerical checks confirm the analytical predictions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The classification might guide the engineering of flat band lattices with controlled localization for quantum devices.
  • In the singular limit the power-law tails could produce measurable long-range correlations not present in exponential cases.
  • Extensions to interacting flat band models may reveal how these decay properties modify pairing or transport.

Load-bearing premise

That flat bands with compact localized states fall into three algebraically distinct categories which can be continuously tuned via a parametrization of the compact states.

What would settle it

Diagonalize a lattice Hamiltonian with tunable CLS parameters, extract the flat band projector matrix elements at large distances, and verify whether the distance dependence matches the predicted exponential form with the estimated ξ, collapses to compact support in the orthogonal limit, or follows the predicted power law in the singular limit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.17258 by Alexei Andreanov, Sergej Flach, Yeongjun Kim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Flatbands (FB) with compact localized eigenstates (CLS) fall into three main categories, controlled by the algebraic properties of the CLS set: orthogonal, linearly independent, linearly dependent (singular). A CLS parametrization allows us to continuously tune a linearly independent FB into a limiting orthogonal or a linearly dependent (singular) one. We derive the asymptotic real space decay of the flat band projectors for each category. The linearly independent FB is characterized by an exponentially decaying projector and a corresponding localization length $\xi$, all dressed by an algebraic prefactor. In the orthogonal limit, the localization length is $\xi=0$, and the projector is compact. The singular FB limit corresponds to $\xi \rightarrow \infty$ with an emerging power law decay of the projector. We obtain analytical estimates for the localization length and the algebraic power law exponents depending on the dimension of the lattice and the number of bands involved. Numerical results are in excellent agreement with the analytics. Our results are of relevance for the understanding of the details of the FB quantum metric discussed in the context of FB superconductivity, the impact of disorder, and the response to local driving.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript classifies flat bands with compact localized states (CLS) into three algebraically distinct categories—orthogonal, linearly independent, and singular (linearly dependent)—controlled by the properties of the CLS set. A continuous parametrization of the CLS set is introduced that tunes between these limits while preserving exact flatness. The central result is an analytical derivation of the asymptotic real-space decay of the flat-band projectors: exponentially decaying with an algebraic prefactor and a finite localization length ξ for the linearly independent case, compact support (ξ = 0) in the orthogonal limit, and power-law decay (ξ → ∞) in the singular limit. Explicit formulas for ξ and the algebraic exponents are obtained in terms of lattice dimension d and number of bands N; these are confirmed by numerical checks on finite lattices.

Significance. If the derivations are correct, the work supplies a systematic, dimension- and band-number-dependent characterization of flat-band projector decay that directly informs the real-space structure of the quantum metric, the robustness of flat bands to disorder, and the response to local driving. The explicit tuning between compact, exponentially localized, and power-law regimes via a single CLS parametrization is a useful organizing principle for lattice models in condensed-matter theory.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (18)] §3.2, Eq. (18): the residue analysis yielding the exponential decay with algebraic prefactor assumes that the CLS overlap matrix remains invertible along the entire tuning path; when the parametrization approaches the singular limit this matrix becomes singular, so the contour deformation argument requires an additional justification that the pole contribution remains dominant over the branch-cut or other singularities that appear at that point.
  2. [§4.1, Eq. (27)] §4.1, Eq. (27): the claimed power-law exponent for the singular limit is derived for a specific choice of the CLS linear dependence; it is not immediately clear whether the exponent remains unchanged when the dependence is realized by a different null vector of the overlap matrix, which would affect the generality of the d- and N-dependent formulas.
minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that the results are 'of relevance for … FB superconductivity,' yet the manuscript contains no explicit calculation linking the derived projector decay to the quantum metric or pairing kernel; a short paragraph or reference to prior work would clarify the connection.
  2. Figure 2 caption: the finite-size scaling used to extract the numerical localization length is described only qualitatively; adding the precise fitting window and the reported uncertainty on ξ would make the agreement with analytics easier to assess.
  3. [§2] Notation: the symbol P(r) is used both for the projector matrix elements and for its trace in several places; a brief clarification in §2 would avoid ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and positive recommendation for minor revision. We address each major comment below and will incorporate clarifications where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2, Eq. (18)] §3.2, Eq. (18): the residue analysis yielding the exponential decay with algebraic prefactor assumes that the CLS overlap matrix remains invertible along the entire tuning path; when the parametrization approaches the singular limit this matrix becomes singular, so the contour deformation argument requires an additional justification that the pole contribution remains dominant over the branch-cut or other singularities that appear at that point.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this subtlety in the contour integration. In our derivation, the residue analysis is carried out for parametrizations where the overlap matrix is invertible, yielding the exponential decay with algebraic prefactor and finite ξ. The singular limit is obtained by taking the limit of the parameters after the asymptotic form is derived, at which point ξ diverges and the decay crosses over to power-law. To strengthen the argument, we will add a paragraph in §3.2 explaining that for any fixed point along the path short of the singular limit the pole is dominant, and the branch cuts or other singularities only emerge exactly at the singular point where the form changes. This clarification will be included in the revised version. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.1, Eq. (27)] §4.1, Eq. (27): the claimed power-law exponent for the singular limit is derived for a specific choice of the CLS linear dependence; it is not immediately clear whether the exponent remains unchanged when the dependence is realized by a different null vector of the overlap matrix, which would affect the generality of the d- and N-dependent formulas.

    Authors: The derivation of the power-law exponent in the singular limit relies on the rank deficiency of the overlap matrix and the resulting structure in the projector. We have checked that the leading asymptotic exponent depends on the dimension d and the number of bands N through the degree of the singularity, which is determined by the codimension or the nullity, but not on the specific direction of the null vector. Different null vectors correspond to different ways to realize the linear dependence but lead to the same scaling because the Fourier transform and the residue or stationary phase analysis yield equivalent leading terms. To make this generality explicit, we will add a short discussion or footnote in §4.1 confirming that the exponent is independent of the particular choice of null vector. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained via CLS algebra and Fourier analysis

full rationale

The central derivation parametrizes the CLS set to tune between orthogonal, linearly independent, and singular flat bands while preserving exact flatness. The projector is expressed in the CLS basis, Fourier-transformed to momentum space, and its real-space asymptotics extracted from pole/residue contributions, yielding explicit formulas for the localization length ξ and algebraic exponents that depend only on lattice dimension d and band number N. These steps rely on algebraic properties of the CLS and standard Fourier analysis; no fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, and no self-citation chain is invoked to justify the uniqueness or form of the result. Numerical checks on finite lattices serve as independent confirmation rather than input to the analytics. The classification is shown to be exhaustive for the models considered by the explicit tuning path.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard domain assumptions of flat-band theory in tight-binding lattices plus the algebraic classification of CLS sets; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Flatbands with CLS fall into three main categories controlled by the algebraic properties of the CLS set: orthogonal, linearly independent, linearly dependent (singular).
    Explicitly stated as the controlling framework in the first sentence of the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5732 in / 1289 out tokens · 28107 ms · 2026-05-18T06:26:28.916693+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Derzhko, J

    O. Derzhko, J. Richter, and M. Maksymenko, Strongly correlated flat-band systems: The route from heisenberg spins to hubbard electrons, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B29, 1530007 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Leykam, A

    D. Leykam, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Artificial flat band systems: from lattice models to experiments, Adv. Phys.: X3, 1473052 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Rhim and B.-J

    J.-W. Rhim and B.-J. Yang, Singular flat bands, Ad- vances in Physics: X6, 1901606 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Danieli, A

    C. Danieli, A. Andreanov, D. Leykam, and S. Flach, Flat band fine-tuning and its photonic applications, Nanopho- tonics13, 3925 (2024), arXiv:2403.17578 [physics.optics]

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Read, Compactly supported wannier functions and algebraick-theory, Phys

    N. Read, Compactly supported wannier functions and algebraick-theory, Phys. Rev. B95, 115309 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Unconventional super- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture556, 43 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Y. Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, E. Khalaf, P. Ledwith, Y. Cao, S. H. Lee, S. Chen, P. R. Forrester, et al., Fractional chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature600, 439 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    E. H. Lieb, Two theorems on the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 1201 (1989)

    work page 1989

  9. [9]

    Mielke, Ferromagnetism in the hubbard model on line graphs and further considerations, J

    A. Mielke, Ferromagnetism in the hubbard model on line graphs and further considerations, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.24, 3311 (1991)

    work page 1991

  10. [10]

    Tasaki, Ferromagnetism in the hubbard models with degenerate single-electron ground states, Phys

    H. Tasaki, Ferromagnetism in the hubbard models with degenerate single-electron ground states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1608 (1992)

    work page 1992

  11. [11]

    Mielke, Stability of ferromagnetism in hubbard models with degenerate single-particle ground states, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General32, 8411 (1999)

    A. Mielke, Stability of ferromagnetism in hubbard models with degenerate single-particle ground states, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General32, 8411 (1999)

    work page 1999

  12. [12]

    J.-W. Rhim, K. Kim, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum distance and anomalous Landau levels of flat bands, Nature584, 59 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    J. T. Chalker, T. S. Pickles, and P. Shukla, Anderson lo- calization in tight-binding models with flat bands, Phys. Rev. B82, 104209 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    M. Goda, S. Nishino, and H. Matsuda, Inverse ander- son transition caused by flatbands, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 126401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  15. [15]

    ˇCadeˇ z, Y

    T. ˇCadeˇ z, Y. Kim, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Metal- insulator transition in infinitesimally weakly disordered flat bands, Phys. Rev. B104, L180201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Y. Kim, T. ˇCadeˇ z, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Flat band induced metal-insulator transitions for weak mag- netic flux and spin-orbit disorder, Phys. Rev. B107, 174202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    S. Lee, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Critical-to-insulator transitions and fractality edges in perturbed flat bands, Phys. Rev. B107, 014204 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    S. Lee, S. Flach, and A. Andreanov, Critical state gen- erators from perturbed flatbands, Chaos: An Interdisci- plinary Journal of Nonlinear Science33, 073125 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Y. Kuno, T. Mizoguchi, and Y. Hatsugai, Flat band quantum scar, Phys. Rev. B102, 241115 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Danieli, A

    C. Danieli, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Many-body flat- band localization, Phys. Rev. B102, 041116 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Vakulchyk, C

    I. Vakulchyk, C. Danieli, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Heat percolation in many-body flat-band localizing sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B104, 144207 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Danieli, A

    C. Danieli, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Many-body lo- calization transition from flat-band fine tuning, Phys. Rev. B105, L041113 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Tilleke, M

    S. Tilleke, M. Daumann, and T. Dahm, Nearest neigh- bour particle-particle interaction in fermionic quasi one- dimensional flat band lattices, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Natur- forschung A75, 393 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Danieli, A

    C. Danieli, A. Maluckov, and S. Flach, Compact discrete breathers on flat-band networks, Low Temp. Phys.44, 678 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Danieli, A

    C. Danieli, A. Andreanov, T. Mithun, and S. Flach, Non- linear caging in all-bands-flat lattices, Phys. Rev. B104, 085131 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Danieli and A

    C. Danieli and A. Andreanov, Compact breathers gen- erator in one-dimensional nonlinear networks (2021), arXiv:2104.11458 [nlin.PS]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    Nakata, T

    Y. Nakata, T. Okada, T. Nakanishi, and M. Kitano, Ob- servation of flat band for terahertz spoof plasmons in a metallic kagom´ e lattice, Phys. Rev. B85, 205128 (2012)

    work page 2012

  28. [28]

    Mukherjee, A

    S. Mukherjee, A. Spracklen, D. Choudhury, N. Goldman, P. ¨Ohberg, E. Andersson, and R. R. Thomson, Obser- vation of a localized flat-band state in a photonic Lieb lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 245504 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Kajiwara, Y

    S. Kajiwara, Y. Urade, Y. Nakata, T. Nakanishi, and M. Kitano, Observation of a nonradiative flat band for spoof surface plasmons in a metallic Lieb lattice, Phys. Rev. B93, 075126 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    R. A. Vicencio, C. Cantillano, L. Morales-Inostroza, B. Real, C. Mej´ ıa-Cort´ es, S. Weimann, A. Szameit, and M. I. Molina, Observation of localized states in Lieb pho- tonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 245503 (2015)

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Nguyen, F

    H. Nguyen, F. Dubois, T. Deschamps, S. Cueff, A. Par- don, J.-L. Leclercq, C. Seassal, X. Letartre, and P. Vik- torovitch, Symmetry breaking in photonic crystals: On- demand dispersion from flatband to dirac cones, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 066102 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Ma, J.-W

    J. Ma, J.-W. Rhim, L. Tang, S. Xia, H. Wang, X. Zheng, S. Xia, D. Song, Y. Hu, Y. Li, B.-J. Yang, D. Leykam, 6 and Z. Chen, Direct observation of flatband loop states arising from nontrivial real-space topology, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 183901 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    S. Taie, H. Ozawa, T. Ichinose, T. Nishio, S. Naka- jima, and Y. Takahashi, Coherent driving and freezing of bosonic matter wave in an optical lieb lattice, Science Advances1, e1500854 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Ozawa, S

    H. Ozawa, S. Taie, T. Ichinose, and Y. Takahashi, Interaction-driven shift and distortion of a flat band in an optical Lieb lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 175301 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Baboux, L

    F. Baboux, L. Ge, T. Jacqmin, M. Biondi, E. Ga- lopin, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, L. Le Gratiet, I. Sagnes, S. Schmidt, H. T¨ ureci, A. Amo, and J. Bloch, Bosonic condensation and disorder-induced localization in a flat band, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 066402 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Masumoto, N

    N. Masumoto, N. Y. Kim, T. Byrnes, K. Kusudo, A. L¨ offler, S. H¨ ofling, A. Forchel, and Y. Yamamoto, Exciton–polariton condensates with flat bands in a two- dimensional kagome lattice, New J. Phys.14, 065002 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    H. Wang, W. Zhang, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Observa- tion of inverse anderson transitions in aharonov-bohm topolectrical circuits, Phys. Rev. B106, 104203 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    H. Wang, B. Yang, W. Xu, Y. Fan, Q. Guo, Z. Zhu, and C. T. Chan, Highly degenerate photonic flat bands arising from complete graph configurations, Phys. Rev. A100, 043841 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    X. Zhou, W. Zhang, H. Sun, and X. Zhang, Obser- vation of flat-band localization and topological edge states induced by effective strong interactions in electri- cal circuit networks, Phys. Rev. B107, 035152 (2023), arXiv:2302.01494 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    M. Kang, S. Fang, L. Ye, H. C. Po, J. Denlinger, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, E. Kaxiras, J. G. Checkelsky, and R. Comin, Topological flat bands in frus- trated kagome lattice cosn, Nature Communications11, 4004 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Tacchi, J

    S. Tacchi, J. Flores-Far´ ıas, D. Petti, F. Brevis, A. Cat- toni, G. Scaramuzzi, D. Girardi, D. Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no, R. A. Gallardo, E. Albisetti, G. Carlotti, and P. Landeros, Ex- perimental observation of flat bands in one-dimensional chiral magnonic crystals, Nano Letters23, 6776 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Chase-Mayoral, L

    C. Chase-Mayoral, L. Q. English, N. Lape, Y. Kim, S. Lee, A. Andreanov, S. Flach, and P. G. Kevrekidis, Compact localized states in electric circuit flat-band lat- tices, Phys. Rev. B109, 075430 (2024), arXiv:2307.15319 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    N. Lape, S. Diubenkov, L. English, P. Kevrekidis, A. An- dreanov, Y. Kim, and S. Flach, Realization and char- acterization of an all-bands-flat electronic lattice, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13571 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Maimaiti, A

    W. Maimaiti, A. Andreanov, H. C. Park, O. Gendelman, and S. Flach, Compact localized states and flat-band gen- erators in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B95, 115135 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Maimaiti, S

    W. Maimaiti, S. Flach, and A. Andreanov, Universal d= 1 flat band generator from compact localized states, Phys. Rev. B99, 125129 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Maimaiti, A

    W. Maimaiti, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Flat-band generator in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B103, 165116 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Graf and F

    A. Graf and F. Pi´ echon, Designing flat-band tight- binding models with tunable multifold band touching points, Phys. Rev. B104, 195128 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Hwang, J.-W

    Y. Hwang, J.-W. Rhim, and B.-J. Yang, General con- struction of flat bands with and without band crossings based on wave function singularity, Phys. Rev. B104, 085144 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Flach, D

    S. Flach, D. Leykam, J. D. Bodyfelt, P. Matthies, and A. S. Desyatnikov, Detangling flat bands into Fano lat- tices, Europhys. Lett.105, 30001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  50. [50]

    Di Benedetto, A

    E. Di Benedetto, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and F. Ciccarello, Dipole-dipole interactions mediated by a photonic flat band, Quantum9, 1671 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    D. L. Bergman, C. Wu, and L. Balents, Band touching from real-space topology in frustrated hopping models, Phys. Rev. B78, 125104 (2008)

    work page 2008

  52. [53]

    J. S. Hofmann, E. Berg, and D. Chowdhury, Supercon- ductivity, charge density wave, and supersolidity in flat bands with a tunable quantum metric, Physical review letters130, 226001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [54]

    See supplemental material at url to be defined.,

    work page

  54. [55]

    Bochner and K

    S. Bochner and K. Chandrasekharan,Fourier transforms, 19 (Princeton University Press, 1949)

    work page 1949

  55. [56]

    Sathe, F

    P. Sathe, F. Harper, and R. Roy, Compactly supported wannier functions and strictly local projectors, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical54, 335302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [57]

    Kohn, Analytic properties of bloch waves and wannier functions, Physical review115, 809 (1959)

    W. Kohn, Analytic properties of bloch waves and wannier functions, Physical review115, 809 (1959)

    work page 1959

  57. [58]

    J. D. Cloizeaux, Energy bands and projection operators in a crystal: Analytic and asymptotic properties, Phys. Rev.135, A685 (1964)

    work page 1964

  58. [60]

    A. M. Marques, D. Viedma, V. Ahufinger, and R. G. Dias, Impurity flat band states in the diamond chain, Communications Physics7, 387 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [61]

    H. Yan, O. Benton, R. Moessner, and A. H. Nevidom- skyy, Classification of classical spin liquids: Typology and resulting landscape, Phys. Rev. B110, L020402 (2024), arXiv:2305.00155 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [62]

    H. Yan, O. Benton, A. H. Nevidomskyy, and R. Moess- ner, Classification of classical spin liquids: Detailed for- malism and suite of examples, Phys. Rev. B109, 174421 (2024), arXiv:2305.19189 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [63]

    G. B. Arfken, H. J. Weber, and F. E. Harris, Ch. 1, in Mathematical Methods for Physicists: A Comprehensive Guide(Academic Press, 2011) pp. 1–66

    work page 2011

  62. [64]

    Real space decay of flat band projectors from compact localized states

    A. Ramachandran, A. Andreanov, and S. Flach, Chiral flat bands: Existence, engineering, and stability, Phys. Rev. B96, 161104(R) (2017). Supplementary material for “Real space decay of flat band projectors from compact localized states” Yeongjun Kim ,1, 2,∗Sergej Flach ,1, 2, 3,†and Alexei Andreanov 1, 2,‡ 1Center for Theoretical Physics of Complex System...

    work page 2017

  63. [65]

    mass gap

    Example: generalized checkerboard lattice 5 B. Examples of nongeneric case 6 C. Anisotropic Lieb lattice 9 References 9 I. CLS CLASSIFICA TION A. Compact localized states (CLS) and the Bloch-CLS Let us consider a flat band (FB) tight-binding HamiltonianHdefined on a lattice Λ, withusublattices (u-orbitals), and itsu×umomentum-space blockH(k) discussed in ...

    work page

  64. [66]

    Example: generalized checkerboard lattice Starting from Eq. (5) of the main text, we write the BCLS as ϕBCLS(k) = [ A+e ikx −(A+e−iky) ] ,(28) and the dual (dispersive-band) vector as ϕDB(k) = [A+e −iky A+e ikx ] .(29) One readily checks orthogonality and equal norms ϕ† BCLS(k)ϕDB(k) = 0,(30) ∥ϕBCLS(k)∥2 =∥ϕDB(k)∥2≡α2(k),(31) with α2(k) =|A+eikx|2 +|A+e−i...

    work page

  65. [67]

    L. S. Ornstein, Accidental deviations of density and opalescence at the critical point of a single substance, Proc. Akad. Sci. 17, 793 (1914)

    work page 1914

  66. [68]

    Michta and G

    E. Michta and G. Slade, Asymptotic behaviour of the lattice green function, arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.04717 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  67. [69]

    Rhim and B.-J

    J.-W. Rhim and B.-J. Yang, Singular flat bands, Advances in Physics: X6, 1901606 (2021). 10

    work page 2021

  68. [70]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics(Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Fort Worth, TX, 1976) Chap. E, appendix E: Many-Body Perturbation Theory and Green’s Functions

    work page 1976

  69. [71]

    N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics(Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Fort Worth, TX, 1976) Chap. 17, chapter 17: Many-Body Theory of Metals

    work page 1976

  70. [72]

    Goldenfeld,Lectures on phase transitions and the renormalization group(CRC Press, 2018)

    N. Goldenfeld,Lectures on phase transitions and the renormalization group(CRC Press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  71. [73]

    Rhim and B.-J

    J.-W. Rhim and B.-J. Yang, Classification of flat bands according to the band-crossing singularity of bloch wave functions, Phys. Rev. B99, 045107 (2019)

    work page 2019