Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 98 references

The Mellin transform of an exponential functional of any killed Lévy process is a ratio of Bernstein-gamma functions, with a boundary-extension table that corrects a prior mistake.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 08:43 UTC pith:BWROUFGY

load-bearing objection A careful survey with a few genuinely new boundary/decay results; the new boundary table is mostly solid, but the cΨ=0 'otherwise' row is underproved and needs a real referee. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2510.19114 v2 pith:BWROUFGY submitted 2025-10-21 math.PR

Recent developments in exponential functionals of L\'evy processes

classification math.PR MSC 60G5160E1044A15
keywords exponential functionalsLévy processesBernstein-gamma functionsMellin transformWiener-Hopf factorizationmoment determinacydensity asymptoticskilled Lévy processes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Exponential functionals of Lévy processes – random variables of the form ∫₀^∞ e^{-ξ_s} ds – appear throughout applied probability as absorption times, stationary laws of Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes, and option prices. This survey consolidates two decades of results showing that the Mellin transform of such a functional always takes the closed form φ−(0)Γ(z)/(W_{φ+}(z)W_{φ−}(1−z)), solving the classical moment recurrence in full generality. The paper's new contribution is a precise boundary-extensibility table: it corrects a prior claim about when the Mellin transform extends continuously to the left boundary, and determines exactly when it does and does not extend at the right boundary. It also supplies new uniform decay estimates for the Mellin transform and new asymptotics for the density and tail. If correct, the boundary table resolves which moments exist and how smooth the density is, in a single parameter-driven statement.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the Mellin transform M_{IΨ}(z)=E[IΨ^{z−1}] of the exponential functional of any potentially killed Lévy process with φ−(0)>0 admits the closed form M_{IΨ}(z)=φ−(0)Γ(z)/(W_{φ+}(z)W_{φ−}(1−z)) on the strip C(cΨ,1−āΨ−), where W_{φ±} are Bernstein-gamma functions built from the Wiener–Hopf factors of the process. Its original contribution is a case-by-case determination of whether this analytic function extends continuously to the two vertical boundaries of the strip. Extension at the right boundary holds when āΨ−=aΨ−>uΨ−=−∞, fails when āΨ−=uΨ−<0, and at the left boundary depends on the finiteness of |φ+(cΨ+)|. The paper also corrects a mistake in the literature: in

What carries the argument

Bernstein-gamma functions Wφ, defined as the unique solution to Wφ(z+1)=φ(z)Wφ(z) with Wφ(1)=1 for a Bernstein function φ, generalize Euler's gamma function and satisfy Weierstrass product and Stirling-type asymptotics. The central mechanism is solving the moment recurrence E[IΨ^z]=−z/Ψ(−z) E[IΨ^{z−1}] through the Wiener–Hopf factorization Ψ(z)=−φ+(−z)φ−(z). The boundary analysis then proceeds by examining the limits of Wφ± and Γ at the strip edges, using their zero-free regions and known complex-analytic properties.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the analytic continuation and zero-free property of the Bernstein-gamma functions Wφ± far enough to the left of the imaginary axis; if those fail at the boundaries, the entire extension table and the contour-shift arguments collapse.

What would settle it

Find a (potentially killed) Lévy process with Wiener–Hopf factors for which the Bernstein-gamma function Wφ has a zero or an analytic obstruction at the boundary point āφ, at which Theorem 3.1 claims either extension or non-extension; then compute the Mellin transform directly and compare with the table. Concretely, test the case aΨ+=0, uΨ+<0, and φ′+(0+)<∞ to see whether the previously claimed A[0,1−āΨ−) extension actually fails as the paper now asserts.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • The Mellin representation (3.13) yields the existence or non-existence of all moments of IΨ directly from the parameters aΨ+, uΨ+, aΨ−, uΨ−.
  • The corrected boundary condition implies that when uΨ+=0 and φ′+(0+)<∞, the negative first moment E[IΨ^{−1}] is finite exactly when the process is unkilled with finite mean; otherwise it is infinite.
  • New uniform decay estimates (Prop. 3.16) permit Mellin inversion on the boundary of the analyticity strip, giving sharp asymptotics for the density and tail.
  • New density and tail asymptotics (Thm. 3.52, Thm. 3.58) refine the behavior as x→∞ and x→0, including previously missing small-x derivative limits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The boundary-extension table could be used as a decision procedure: given a Lévy process's Wiener–Hopf factors, one can read off which moments exist without computing the functional.
  • The corrected condition suggests that applications relying on the previous criterion (with āΨ+=0 rather than uΨ+=0) may need re-examination in the boundary case where aΨ+=0 but uΨ+<0.
  • The uniform decay estimates may enable fully rigorous saddle-point derivations for the small-x density of the exponential functional, potentially resolving the Bertoin–Yor moment-determinacy conjecture.
  • The boundary table gives a natural test bed for verifying the sharpness of the Wiener–Hopf factorisation's uniqueness under weak non-lattice assumptions, since the extension failures are tied to pole–zero cancellations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper is a survey of exponential functionals of (potentially killed) Lévy processes, organized around the Mellin-transform representation M_{I_Ψ}(z)=φ_-(0)Γ(z)/(W_{φ_+}(z)W_{φ_-}(1-z)). It reviews two decades of developments, including Bernstein-gamma functions, moment formulas, smoothness, factorizations, tail and small-x asymptotics, and integral equations. The paper also claims several original complements: a corrected and extended boundary-extension table in Theorem 3.1, new uniform decay estimates in Proposition 3.16, a new tail refinement in Theorem 3.52, and small-x boundary results in Theorem 3.58. The survey part is largely a synthesis of published results by Patie–Savov, Minchev–Savov, and others, while the new results are concentrated in the boundary and contour-shift arguments.

Significance. If the new boundary-extension results and uniform estimates are correct, the paper would be a valuable reference: it consolidates a large literature and fixes a subtle condition in [PS18, Thm 2.1] concerning c_Ψ. The use of published Wiener–Hopf factorizations and Bernstein-gamma machinery is appropriate, and the survey component alone is likely useful. However, the original contributions are not all backed by complete proofs, and at least one of them (Proposition 3.16) appears to be false as stated. Since these complements are used in later claims (Theorem 3.58), the paper needs substantive revision before it can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Proposition 3.16, §3.1 (after Theorem 3.11)] The first claim of Proposition 3.16 is not correct as stated. For a killed Brownian motion with q>0, μ=0 and σ²>0 (Section 3.1.1, Eq. (3.23)), N_Ψ=∞. Applying Stirling's formula to the gamma factors in (3.23) gives |M(a+ib)/M(a'+ib)| ~ C |b|^{a-a'} for a≠a'. For any interval (c,d) of positive length, the supremum in (3.20) therefore grows like a positive power of |b|, not like O(log|b|). The proof's line 'when N_Ψ=∞ the claim is established' relies on |φ(z)|=d|z|(1+o(1)) uniformly, but this is valid only when the relevant Bernstein function has drift d>0; for d=0 the logarithmic estimate of the integrand is still O(log|b|), which exponentiates to a polynomial factor. This invalidates the stated bound and its use in Theorem 3.58(3).
  2. [Theorem 3.1, c_Ψ=0 boundary row; Remark 3.3] The 'otherwise' row in the c_Ψ=0 block is not proved. The proof delegates the case c_Ψ=0 to Remark 3.3, but that remark only corrects the indicator condition from ¯a_Ψ^+=0 to u_Ψ^+=0; it does not analyze Γ(z)/W_{φ_+}(z) as z→0 when φ_+'(0+)=∞. The text suggests that unboundedness of φ_+(x) near 0 forces the quotient to diverge, but W_{φ_+}(x) may itself blow up in a coordinated way (via the recurrence W_{φ_+}(x+1)=φ_+(x)W_{φ_+}(x)), so cancellation is possible. A complete proof must control the joint asymptotics of Γ and W_{φ_+} at the boundary. The same gap appears in the c_Ψ<0 row: when φ_+(c_Ψ+)=∞, the displayed factor diverges, but the remaining limit Γ(1+c_Ψ)/W_{φ_+}(1+c_Ψ) may vanish, leaving the product indeterminate.
  3. [Theorem 3.58(3) and its proof] The proof of Theorem 3.58(3) uses Proposition 3.16 to justify shifting the Mellin inversion contour to C_{-a_Ψ^+}. Since Proposition 3.16's first assertion is false, the proof as written is incomplete. The statement of Theorem 3.58(3) may still be true, but a correct proof should rely directly on the boundary-line decay from Corollary 3.14, with an explicit verification that the integrand is integrable on C_{-a_Ψ^+} and that the Riemann–Lebesgue argument does not require the invalid uniform ratio bound over an interval of real parts.
  4. [Theorem 3.52] This is presented as a new result, but its proof is only a four-line sketch referring to [PS18, Prop. 7.2] and the proof of [PS18, Thm. 2.11]. The contour shift picks up a pole at 1-u_Ψ^- and yields an error term o(x^{y-u_Ψ^-}) for arbitrary y in (u_Ψ^-(2), u_Ψ^-); the reader cannot verify the required integrability and zero/pole conditions from the text. Please either expand the proof to a complete argument or explicitly present the theorem as a corollary of [PS18] with a detailed derivation.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3.1.1, after Eq. (3.23)] The sentence 'It follows that I_Ψ<∞ almost surely if and only if q>0 or μ>0; see (3.20)' should refer to (3.2), not (3.20).
  2. [Theorem 3.21 proof] In the Hölder-continuity argument, the perturbation parameter d is used in y=(1+d)x and also appears as the drift coefficient elsewhere. Rename the perturbation (e.g., ε or h) to avoid confusion.
  3. [Remark 3.17] The remark asserts that (3.20) gives uniform decay over compact subsets of the real part. In view of the counterexample to Proposition 3.16, this remark needs to be revised or qualified, even if a weaker polynomial-in-|b| bound is retained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central Mellin representation and boundary extensions are derived from published theorems rather than fitted to the target results.

full rationale

The paper's central identity (3.13) is quoted as [PS18, Thm. 2.1], and the new boundary-extension table in Theorem 3.1 is proved from the recurrence (2.1), the Wiener-Hopf factorization (3.3), and the zero-free/continuation properties of Wphi assembled in Theorem 4.3 (itself [PS18, Thm. 4.1] and [PS21, Thm. 6.0.1]). These are published, peer-reviewed inputs with proofs independent of this survey's conclusions; no parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then reported as a prediction. The genuinely new claims (boundary extension/non-extension rows, Theorems 3.52 and 3.58) follow by limiting arguments and Mellin-inversion contour shifts that use the prior theorems, not by re-defining the output as the input. There is heavy self-citation, especially to [PS18] and [PS21], and some new proofs are sketches (e.g., the cPsi=0 'otherwise' row), but the load-bearing analytic facts are stated as borrowed theorems rather than as assumptions equaling the desired conclusions. Theorem 3.58's proof invokes [PS18, Prop. 7.2] and 'the Mellin inversion argument in the proof of [PS18, Thm. 2.11]' as the mechanism; this is self-citation, but it is citation of a proven external result, not a circular reduction. The moment and corollary statements are direct transcriptions of the Mellin representation, but that is a theorem application, not self-definition. No step was found where Eq. X equals Eq. Y by construction or where a fitted input is renamed a prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; the paper is a mathematical survey. The listed axioms are prior theorems in Lévy fluctuation theory and Bernstein functions that the new proofs import. No new entities are invented.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Every potentially killed Lévy process admits the Wiener-Hopf factorisation Ψ(z)=−ϕ+(−z)ϕ−(z) with ϕ± Bernstein functions (Eq. 3.3).
    The entire Mellin transform representation (3.13) is built on this factorisation; it is asserted from [Ber96, Don07] and not reproved.
  • domain assumption For a Bernstein function ϕ there exists a unique Bernstein-gamma function Wϕ solving Wϕ(z+1)=ϕ(z)Wϕ(z), Wϕ(1)=1, with product representation and analytic continuation Wϕ∈A(¯aϕ,∞)∩M(aϕ,∞) zero-free on C(aϕ,∞).
    Taken from [PS21, Thm 6.0.1], [PS18, Thm 4.1], [BS21]; all boundary arguments rely on this continuation.
  • domain assumption IΨ is finite a.s. iff φ−(0)>0 (Eq. 3.2).
    This domain condition defines the setting of all theorems in Section 3.
  • domain assumption The Mellin transform satisfies the recurrence E[I^z] = -z/Ψ(-z) E[I^{z-1}] on suitable strips, and its solution is identified with the quotient in (3.13).
    Recurrence history from CPY97/MZ06; solution identification from PS18; used to derive moment formulas and boundary behavior.
  • domain assumption Mellin inversion can be shifted to boundary lines using polynomial/exponential decay estimates for M_IΨ, e.g. [PS18, Prop 3.1, Prop 7.1-7.2] and Proposition 3.16.
    Used in proofs of Theorems 3.52 and 3.58 without a fully formal verification of all boundary integrability conditions.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 41168 in / 14140 out tokens · 114677 ms · 2026-08-04T08:43:28.919494+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Recent developments in exponential functionals of L\'evy processes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BWROUFGY

@misc{pith2026251019114,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Recent developments in exponential functionals of L\'evy processes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BWROUFGY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.19114}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This survey aims to review two decades of progress on exponential functionals of (possibly killed) real-valued L\'evy processes. Since the publication of the seminal survey by Bertoin and Yor, substantial advances have been made in understanding the structure and properties of these random variables. At the same time, numerous applications of these quantities have emerged across various different contexts of modern applied probability. Motivated by all this, in this manuscript, we provide a detailed overview of these developments, beginning with a discussion of the class of special functions that have played a central role in recent progress, and then organising the main results on exponential functionals into thematic groups. Moreover, we complement several of these results and set them within a unified framework. Throughout, we strive to offer a coherent historical account of each contribution, highlighting both the probabilistic and analytical techniques that have driven the advances in the field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alili, W

    L. Alili, W. Jedidi, and V. Rivero. On exponential functionals, harmonic potential measures and undershoots of subordinators. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. , 11(2) page 711–735, 2014

  2. [2]

    Arista and V

    J. Arista and V. Rivero. Implicit renewal theory for exponential functionals of L \' e vy processes. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , v.163 pages 262--287, September 2023. DOI 10.1016/j.spa.2023.06.004

  3. [3]

    A. Barker. Path Properties of Lévy Processes . PhD thesis, University of Reading, UK, 2019

  4. [4]

    Bertoin, Ph

    J. Bertoin, Ph. Biane, and M. Yor. Poissonian exponential functionals, q -series, q -integrals, and the moment problem for log-normal distributions. In Seminar on S tochastic A nalysis, R andom F ields and A pplications IV , volume 58 of Progr. Probab. , pages 45--56. Birkh\"auser, Basel, 2004

  5. [5]

    Bertoin and M

    J. Bertoin and M. E. Caballero. Entrance from 0+ for increasing semi-stable M arkov processes. Bernoulli , 8(2) pages 195--205, 2002

  6. [6]

    Bertoin, N

    J. Bertoin, N. Curien, and I. Kortchemski. Random planar maps and growth-fragmentations. Ann. Probab. , 46(1) pages 207--260, 2018. DOI 10.1214/17-AOP1183

  7. [7]

    Bertoin, N

    J. Bertoin, N. Curien, and A. Riera. Self-similar M arkov trees and scaling limits, 2025. to appear in IMS Monographs., DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2407.07888

  8. [8]

    Bernyk, R

    V. Bernyk, R. C. Dalang, and G. Peskir. The law of the supremum of a stable L \'evy process with no negative jumps. Ann. Probab. , 36(5) pages 1777--1789, 2008. DOI 10.1214/07-AOP376

  9. [9]

    A. Behme. Exponential functionals of L \'e vy processes with jumps. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. , 12(1) pages 375--397, 2015

  10. [10]

    J. Bertoin. L \'e vy Processes , volume 121 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, 1996. DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511624093

  11. [11]

    J. Bertoin. Self-similar fragmentations. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincar \'e Probabilit \'e s et Statistiques , 38(3) pages 319--340, 2002. DOI 10.1016/S0246-0203(00)01073-6

  12. [12]

    J. Bertoin. Random fragmentation and coagulation processes , volume 102 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006. DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511617768

  13. [13]

    Ch. Berg. On powers of S tieltjes moment sequences, I I . Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics , 199(1) pages 23--38, Feb 2007. DOI 10.1016/j.cam.2005.04.072

  14. [14]

    B \"o inghoff and M

    Ch. B \"o inghoff and M. Hutzenthaler. Branching diffusions in random environment. Markov Process. Related Fields , 18(2) pages 269--310, 2012

  15. [15]

    Bertoin and I

    J. Bertoin and I. Kortchemski. Self-similar scaling limits of M arkov chains on the positive integers. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 26(4) pages 2556--2595, 2016. DOI 10.1214/15-AAP1157

  16. [16]

    Behme and A

    A. Behme and A. Lindner. On exponential functionals of L \'e vy processes. J. Theoret. Probab. , 28(2) pages 681--720, 2015. DOI 10.1007/s10959-013-0507-y

  17. [17]

    Bertoin, A

    J. Bertoin, A. Lindner, and R. Maller. On continuity properties of the law of integrals of L \'evy processes. In S\'eminaire de probabilit\'es XLI , volume 1934 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 137--159. Springer, Berlin, 2008. DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-77913-1\_6

  18. [18]

    Behme, A

    A. Behme, A. Lindner, and R. Maller. Stationary solutions of the stochastic differential equation dv_t=v_ t- du_t+dl_t with L \' e vy noise. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , 121(1) pages 91--108, January 2011. DOI 10.1016/j.spa.2010.09.003

  19. [19]

    Behme, A

    A. Behme, A. Lindner, and J. Reker. On the law of killed exponential functionals. Electronic Journal of Probability , 26(none), January 2021. DOI 10.1214/21-ejp616

  20. [20]

    Behme, A

    A. Behme, A. Lindner, J. Reker, and V. Rivero. Continuity properties and the support of killed exponential functionals. Stochastic Process. Appl. , v.140 pages 115--146, 2021. DOI 10.1016/j.spa.2021.06.002

  21. [21]

    Bartholmé and P

    C. Bartholmé and P. Patie. Turán inequalities and complete monotonicity for a class of entire functions. Analysis Mathematica , 47(3) pages 507--527, Sep 2021. DOI 10.1007/s10476-021-0088-4

  22. [22]

    Bertoin and M

    J. Bertoin and M. Savov. Some applications of duality for L évy processes in a half-line. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society , 43(1) pages 97--110, Feb 2011. DOI 10.1112/blms/bdq084

  23. [23]

    Barker and M

    A. Barker and M. Savov. Bivariate B ernstein–gamma functions and moments of exponential functionals of subordinators. Stochastic Process. Appl. , v.131 pages 454--497, January 2021. DOI 10.1016/j.spa.2020.09.017

  24. [24]

    T. Budd. The peeling process on random planar maps coupled to an O (n) loop model (with an appendix by L inxiao C hen). arxiv:1809.02012 , 2018

  25. [25]

    Bertoin and M

    J. Bertoin and M. Yor. On subordinators, self-similar M arkov processes and some factorizations of the exponential variable. Electron. Comm. Probab. , v.6 pages 95--106, 2001. DOI 10.1214/ECP.v6-1039

  26. [26]

    Bertoin and M

    J. Bertoin and M. Yor. The entrance laws of self-similar M arkov processes and exponential functionals of L \' e vy processes. Potential Anal. , 17(4) pages 389--400, 2002. DOI 10.1023/A:1016377720516

  27. [27]

    Bertoin and M

    J. Bertoin and M. Yor. On the entire moments of self-similar M arkov processes and exponential functionals of L évy processes. Annales de la faculté des sciences de Toulouse Mathématiques , 11(1) pages 33--45, 2002. DOI 10.5802/afst.1016

  28. [28]

    Bertoin and M

    J. Bertoin and M. Yor. Exponential functionals of L \' e vy processes. Probab. Surv. , v.2 pages 191--212, 2005. DOI 10.1214/154957805100000122

  29. [29]

    M. E. Caballero and L. Chaumont. Conditioned stable L évy processes and the L amperti representation. Journal of Applied Probability , 43(04) pages 967--983, Dec 2006. DOI 10.1017/s0021900200002369

  30. [30]

    M. E. Caballero and L. Chaumont. Weak convergence of positive self-similar M arkov processes and overshoots of L \' e vy processes. Ann. Probab. , 34(3) pages 1012--1034, 2006. DOI 10.1214/009117905000000611

  31. [31]

    R. Chhaibi. A note on a P oissonian functional and a q -deformed D ufresne identity. Electron. Commun. Probab. , v.21 pages Paper No. 35, 13, 2016. DOI 10.1214/16-ECP4055

  32. [32]

    Cai and S

    N. Cai and S. Kou. Pricing A sian options under a hyper-exponential jump diffusion model. Operations Research , 60(1) pages 64--77, Feb 2012. DOI 10.1287/opre.1110.1006

  33. [33]

    Chazal, A

    M. Chazal, A. Kyprianou, and P. Patie. A transformation for spectrally negative Lévy processes and applications. In A Lifetime of Excursions Through Random Walks and Lévy Processes , volume 78 of Progress in Probability , pages 157--180. Birkhäuser, Cham, Switzerland, 2021. DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-83309-1\_9

  34. [34]

    Carmona, F

    Ph. Carmona, F. Petit, and M. Yor. Sur les fonctionnelles exponentielles de certains processus de L \'evy. Stochastics Stochastics Rep. , 47(1-2) pages 71--101, 1994

  35. [35]

    Carmona, Fr

    Ph. Carmona, Fr. Petit, and M. Yor. On the distribution and asymptotic resultsfor exponential functionals of L \' e vy processes. In Exponential functionals andprincipal values related to Brownian motion , page 73–130. Bibl. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana, 1997

  36. [36]

    Carmona, Fr

    Ph. Carmona, Fr. Petit, and M. Yor. Exponential functionals of L \' e vy processes. In L \' e vy Processes , pages 41--55. Birkh\" a user Boston, 2001. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-0197-7\_2

  37. [37]

    B. Dadoun. Asymptotics of self-similar growth-fragmentation processes. Electronic Journal of Probability , v.22 pages Paper No. 27, 30, 2017. DOI 10.1214/17-EJP41

  38. [38]

    R. A. Doney. Fluctuation theory for L \' e vy processes , volume 1897 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, Berlin, 2007

  39. [39]

    Doney and M

    R. Doney and M. Savov. The asymptotic behavior of densities related to the supremum of a stable process. The Annals of Probability , 38(1), Jan 2010. DOI 10.1214/09-aop479

  40. [40]

    D\" o ring, M

    L. D\" o ring, M. Savov, L. Trottner, and A. Watson. The uniqueness of the W iener- H opf factorisation of L \' e vy processes and random walks. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. , 56(9) pages 2951--2968, 2024. DOI 10.1112/blms.13112

  41. [41]

    Dufresne

    D. Dufresne. The D istribution of a perpetuity, with applications to risk theory and pension funding. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal , 1990(1) pages 39--79, Jan 1990. DOI 10.1080/03461238.1990.10413872

  42. [42]

    L. Euler. De progressionibus transcendentibus seu quarum termini generales algebraice dari nequeunt. Commentarii Academiae scientiarum imperialis Petropolitanae , v.5 pages 36--57, 1738

  43. [43]

    Goldie and R

    Ch. Goldie and R. Grübel. Perpetuities with thin tails. Advances in Applied Probability , 28(2) pages 463--480, Jun 1996. DOI 10.2307/1428067

  44. [44]

    Gouri\'eroux and Y

    Ch. Gouri\'eroux and Y. Lu. Susceptible-infected-recovered model with stochastic transmission. Canad. J. Statist. , 53(2) pages Paper No. e11835, 30, 2025. DOI 10.1002/cjs.11835

  45. [45]

    Guillemin, Ph

    F. Guillemin, Ph. Robert, and B. Zwart. AIMD algorithms and exponential functionals. The Annals of Applied Probability , 14(1), Feb 2004. DOI 10.1214/aoap/1075828048

  46. [46]

    B. Haas. Tail asymptotics for extinction times of self-similar fragmentations. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincar \'e Probabilit \'e s et Statistiques , 59(3) pages 1722--1743, 2023. DOI 10.1214/22-AIHP1311

  47. [47]

    Precise asymptotics for the density and the upper tail of exponential functionals of subordinators

    B\' e n\' e dicte Haas. Precise asymptotics for the density and the upper tail of exponential functionals of subordinators. In S\' e minaire de P robabilit\' e s LII , volume 2363 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 389--426. Springer, Cham, 2025. DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-86422-3\_10

  48. [48]

    Hubalek and A

    F. Hubalek and A. Kuznetsov. A convergent series representation for the density of the supremum of a stable process. Electronic Communications in Probability , 16(none), Jan 2011. DOI 10.1214/ecp.v16-1601

  49. [49]

    Hackmann and A

    D. Hackmann and A. Kuznetsov. Asian options and meromorphic L \' e vy processes. Finance Stoch. , 18(4) pages 825--844, 2014. DOI 10.1007/s00780-014-0237-8

  50. [50]

    Haas and V

    B. Haas and V. Rivero. Quasi-stationary distributions and Y aglom limits of self-similar M arkov processes. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , 122(12) pages 4054--4095, Dec 2012. DOI 10.1016/j.spa.2012.08.006

  51. [51]

    Hirsch and M

    F. Hirsch and M. Yor. On the M ellin transforms of the perpetuity and the remainder variables associated to a subordinator. Bernoulli , 19(4), Sep 2013. DOI 10.3150/12-bejsp01

  52. [52]

    P. Kevei. Ergodic properties of generalized O rnstein-- U hlenbeck processes. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , 128(1) pages 156--181, 2018. DOI 10.1016/j.spa.2017.04.010

  53. [53]

    Karp and A

    D. Karp and A. Kuznetsov. Extending the M eijer G-function. Constructive Approximation , 2024. Published online 2 Dec 2024, DOI 10.1007/s00365-024-09701-4

  54. [54]

    Kuznetsov, A

    A. Kuznetsov, A. Kyprianou, and J. C. Pardo. Meromorphic L évy processes and their fluctuation identities. The Annals of Applied Probability , 22(3), Jun 2012. DOI 10.1214/11-aap787

  55. [55]

    Kl\"uppelberg, A

    C. Kl\"uppelberg, A. Lindner, and R. Maller. Continuous time volatility modelling: COGARCH versus O rnstein- U hlenbeck models. In From stochastic calculus to mathematical finance , pages 393--419. Springer, Berlin, 2006. DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-30788-4\_21

  56. [56]

    Kuznetsov and J

    A. Kuznetsov and J. C. Pardo. Fluctuations of S table P rocesses and E xponential F unctionals of H ypergeometric L évy P rocesses. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae , 123(1) pages 113--139, Feb 2013. DOI 10.1007/s10440-012-9718-y

  57. [57]

    Kuznetsov, J.C

    A. Kuznetsov, J.C. Pardo, and M. Savov. Distributional properties of exponential functionals of L \' e vy processes. Electron. J. Probab. , 17(none), January 1, 2012. DOI 10.1214/ejp.v17-1755

  58. [58]

    Kuznetsov

    A. Kuznetsov. On extrema of stable processes. Ann. Probab. , 39(3) pages 1027--1060, 2011. DOI 10.1214/10-AOP577

  59. [59]

    Kuznetsov

    A. Kuznetsov. On the distribution of exponential functionals for L évy processes with jumps of rational transform. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , 122(2) pages 654--663, Feb 2012. DOI 10.1016/j.spa.2011.09.007

  60. [60]

    Kuznetsov

    A. Kuznetsov. On the density of the supremum of a stable process. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , 123(3) pages 986--1003, Mar 2013. DOI 10.1016/j.spa.2012.11.001

  61. [61]

    Lamperti

    J. Lamperti. Semi-stable M arkov processes. I . Zeitschrift fur Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete , 22(3) pages 205--225, 1972. DOI 10.1007/bf00536091

  62. [62]

    G. D. Lin. Recent D evelopments on the M oment P roblem. Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications , 4(1) pages 1--17, 2017. DOI 10.1186/s40488-017-0059-2

  63. [63]

    Loeffen, R

    R. Loeffen, R. Patie, and M. Savov. Extinction time of non- M arkovian self-similar processes, persistence, annihilation of jumps and the F r \' e chet distribution. Journal of Statistical Physics , 175(5) pages 1022--1041, March 2019. DOI 10.1007/s10955-019-02279-3

  64. [64]

    Letemplier and Th

    J. Letemplier and Th. Simon. On the law of homogeneous stable functionals. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics , v.23 pages 82--111, 2019. DOI 10.1051/ps/2018028

  65. [65]

    Li and W

    Z. Li and W. Xu. Asymptotic results for exponential functionals of l \' e vy processes. Stochastic Processes and their Applications , 128(1) pages 108--131, January 2018. DOI 10.1016/j.spa.2017.04.005

  66. [66]

    M. Minchev. Functionals of L évy processes and their applications . PhD thesis, Sofia University, 2024

  67. [67]

    Madan and E

    D. Madan and E. Seneta. The variance gamma (v.g.) model for share market returns. The Journal of Business , 63(4) pages 511--524, Oct 1990. DOI 10.2307/2353303

  68. [68]

    Minchev and M

    M. Minchev and M. Savov. Asymptotics for densities of exponential functionals of subordinators. Bernoulli , 29(4), Nov 2023. DOI 10.3150/23-bej1584

  69. [69]

    Minchev and M

    M. Minchev and M. Savov. Bivariate B ernstein-gamma functions, potential measures, and asymptotics of exponential functionals of L \'evy processes. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 2025. DOI 10.1090/tran/9519

  70. [70]

    Maulik and B

    Kr. Maulik and B. Zwart. Tail asymptotics for exponential functionals of L \' e vy processes. Stochastic Process. Appl. , 116(2) pages 156--177, 2006. DOI 10.1016/j.spa.2005.09.002

  71. [71]

    A. Pakes. Convolution equivalence and infinite divisibility. Journal of Applied Probability , 41(02) pages 407--424, Jun 2004. DOI 10.1017/s002190020001439x

  72. [72]

    P. Patie. Exponential functional of a new family of L \' e vy processes and self-similar continuous state branching processes with immigration. Bull. Sci. Math. , 133(4) pages 355--382, 2009. DOI 10.1016/j.bulsci.2008.10.001

  73. [73]

    P. Patie. Infinite divisibility of solutions to some self-similar integro-differential equations and exponential functionals of L \' e vy processes. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar\' e Probab. Stat. , 45(3) pages 667--684, 2009. DOI 10.1214/08-AIHP182

  74. [74]

    P. Patie. Law of the absorption time of some positive self-similar M arkov processes. The Annals of Probability , 40(2), Mar 2012. DOI 10.1214/10-aop638

  75. [75]

    P. Patie. Asian options under one-sided L \' e vy models. J. Appl. Probab. , 50(2) pages 359--373, 2013. DOI 10.1239/jap/1371648946

  76. [76]

    J. C. Pardo, P. Patie, and M. Savov. A W iener- H opf type factorization for the exponential functional of L \' e vy processes. J. Lond. Math. Soc. , 86(3) pages 930--956, September 24, 2012. DOI 10.1112/jlms/jds028

  77. [77]

    Palau, J

    S. Palau, J. C. Pardo, and Ch. Smadi. Asymptotic behaviour of exponential functionals of L \'evy processes with applications to random processes in random environment. ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. , 13(2) pages 1235--1258, 2016. DOI 10.30757/alea.v13-42

  78. [78]

    J. C. Pardo, V. Rivero, and K. van Schaik. On the density of exponential functionals of L \'evy processes. Bernoulli , 19(5A) pages 1938--1964, 2013. DOI 10.3150/12-BEJ436

  79. [79]

    Patie and M

    P. Patie and M. Savov. Extended factorizations of exponential functionals of L \' e vy processes. Electron. J. Probab. , 17(none), January 1, 2012. DOI 10.1214/ejp.v17-2057

  80. [80]

    Patie and M

    P. Patie and M. Savov. Exponential functional of L \' e vy processes: G eneralized W eierstrass products and W iener– H opf factorization. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris , 351(9-10) pages 393--396, May 2013. DOI 10.1016/j.crma.2013.04.023

Showing first 80 references.