pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.22180 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-25 · 📡 eess.SP

Experimental Demonstration of Multi-Target Tracking in Integrated Sensing and Communication

Maximilian Bauhofer , Marcus Henninger , Meik Kottkamp , Lucas Giroto , Philip Grill , Alexander Felix , Thorsten Wild , Stephan ten Brink
show 1 more author
Silvio Mandelli
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 04:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords multi-target trackingintegrated sensing and communicationprobability hypothesis density filter5Gfactory environmentradar target emulatorranging errordetection rate
0
0 comments X

The pith

A probability hypothesis density filter tracks multiple targets with under 1.5 meter ranging error in real 5G ISAC factory tests.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates multi-target tracking in an integrated sensing and communication system by applying the probability hypothesis density filter to range and radial speed measurements. It uses a 5G compliant proof-of-concept hardware setup inside a real factory, where targets are created by a radar emulator to mimic pedestrians. The end-to-end pipeline from raw data capture through post-processing and tracking is described in detail. A sympathetic reader would care because this shows that cellular systems can add practical sensing capabilities without ideal hardware or perfect conditions. The results are compared against simulations to confirm performance in challenging scenarios with clutter.

Core claim

The authors establish that multi-target tracking based on the PHD filter in the range and radial speed domain achieves mean absolute ranging error less than 1.5 meters and detection rates above 91 percent when implemented on a 5G compliant ISAC proof-of-concept in a real factory environment with targets generated by a radar target emulator.

What carries the argument

The probability hypothesis density (PHD) filter in the range and radial speed domain, which processes measurements from the ISAC system to estimate and track multiple targets while handling clutter and non-ideal hardware.

If this is right

  • The complete measurement-to-tracking pipeline works on real 5G hardware despite emphasis on communication performance.
  • Tracking maintains high detection and low error in factory environments that include clutter.
  • Simulation comparisons confirm the approach scales to realistic but challenging multi-target scenarios.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could extend to dynamic environments beyond factories if the filter parameters are adjusted for different clutter levels.
  • Combining the tracking output with communication data streams might reduce errors further in future ISAC designs.
  • Similar PHD-based tracking could be tested at other frequencies or with different hardware emphases to broaden ISAC applications.

Load-bearing premise

The pedestrian-like targets generated by the radar target emulator accurately represent the challenges and behavior of actual moving targets in typical ISAC use cases.

What would settle it

Repeating the experiment with actual walking humans instead of the radar emulator in the same factory setup and measuring whether the mean absolute ranging error exceeds 1.5 meters or detection rates fall below 91 percent.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.22180 by Alexander Felix, Lucas Giroto, Marcus Henninger, Maximilian Bauhofer, Meik Kottkamp, Philip Grill, Silvio Mandelli, Stephan ten Brink, Thorsten Wild.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Block diagram of the complete tracker setup. The ’online’ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Image of the measurement setup in the ARENA2036. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of the setup enabling static and dynamic object [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Block diagram of the processing pipeline. It handles OFDM radar signal processing, management of scenario and hardware effects [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Examples of measured periodograms after different steps of the processing pipeline. The ground truth objects are marked with ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Scenario 4 with six objects, used for object emulation and as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Tracking performance of the PHD filter with measurements for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

For a wide range of envisioned integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) use cases, it is necessary to incorporate tracking techniques into cellular communication systems. While numerous multi-target tracking (MTT) algorithms exist, they have not yet been applied to real-world ISAC, with its challenges such as clutter and non-optimal hardware with design emphasis on communication instead of sensing. In this work, we showcase MTT based on the probability hypothesis density (PHD) filter in the range and radial speed domain. The measurements are taken with a 5G compliant ISAC proof-of-concept in a real factory environment, where the pedestrian-like targets are generated by a radar target emulator. We detail the complete pipeline, from measurement acquisition to evaluation, with a focus on the post-processing of the raw captured data and the tracking itself. Our end-to-end evaluation and comparison to simulations show good MTT performance with mean absolute ranging error <1.5m and detection rates >91% for realistic but challenging scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an experimental demonstration of multi-target tracking (MTT) using the probability hypothesis density (PHD) filter in the range-radial speed domain for 5G integrated sensing and communication (ISAC). Measurements are collected with a proof-of-concept ISAC prototype in a real factory environment, where pedestrian-like targets are produced by a radar target emulator. The authors detail the end-to-end pipeline from raw data acquisition through post-processing and tracking, reporting mean absolute ranging error below 1.5 m and detection rates above 91% for challenging scenarios, with comparisons to simulations.

Significance. If the reported performance holds under closer scrutiny, the work would be significant as one of the first end-to-end experimental validations of MTT algorithms in a realistic ISAC setting. It directly addresses practical issues such as clutter and communication-optimized hardware, providing concrete metrics and a reproducible pipeline that can guide future ISAC system design.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (Experimental Results): the central claims of mean absolute ranging error <1.5 m and detection rates >91% are presented without error bars, data exclusion criteria, or the exact PHD filter parameters (birth intensity, clutter rate, gating thresholds). These omissions prevent verification of the quantitative performance and undermine the strength of the end-to-end evaluation.
  2. [§3] §3 (Measurement Setup): the claim that the radar target emulator produces 'realistic but challenging scenarios' is load-bearing for generalization to typical ISAC use cases. The manuscript does not characterize how the emulator reproduces non-rigid micro-Doppler signatures, aspect-dependent RCS fluctuations, or spatially correlated factory clutter; an emulator that injects deterministic point-target echoes may yield easier tracking conditions than live pedestrians.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§4] The post-processing steps applied to the raw captured data are mentioned but not described with sufficient algorithmic detail or pseudocode to allow reproduction.
  2. [Throughout] Notation for radial speed versus Doppler frequency should be unified across text, equations, and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive comments, which help strengthen the clarity and verifiability of our experimental demonstration. We address each major comment in detail below and indicate the revisions we will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (Experimental Results): the central claims of mean absolute ranging error <1.5 m and detection rates >91% are presented without error bars, data exclusion criteria, or the exact PHD filter parameters (birth intensity, clutter rate, gating thresholds). These omissions prevent verification of the quantitative performance and undermine the strength of the end-to-end evaluation.

    Authors: We agree that additional details are needed to support the quantitative claims. In the revised version we will include error bars computed across repeated experimental runs for both the ranging error and detection rate metrics. We will also explicitly state the data exclusion criteria (standard SNR-based outlier removal with no other post-hoc exclusions) and report the precise PHD filter parameters used, including birth intensity, clutter rate, and gating thresholds. These additions will be placed in §4 and referenced in the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (Measurement Setup): the claim that the radar target emulator produces 'realistic but challenging scenarios' is load-bearing for generalization to typical ISAC use cases. The manuscript does not characterize how the emulator reproduces non-rigid micro-Doppler signatures, aspect-dependent RCS fluctuations, or spatially correlated factory clutter; an emulator that injects deterministic point-target echoes may yield easier tracking conditions than live pedestrians.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the radar target emulator does not fully reproduce non-rigid micro-Doppler signatures or aspect-dependent RCS fluctuations of live pedestrians. Because our MTT operates in the range-radial speed domain, the emulator still enables controlled evaluation of multi-target resolution, factory clutter, and communication-optimized hardware effects that are central to the ISAC setting. We will revise §3 to add an explicit discussion of these emulator limitations while retaining the claim that the scenarios remain challenging for the targeted domain. This clarification will help readers assess the scope of generalization. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental results grounded in direct measurements

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental demonstration of MTT using a 5G ISAC prototype in a real factory environment, with pedestrian-like targets generated by a radar target emulator. Key claims (mean absolute ranging error <1.5 m and detection rates >91%) derive from end-to-end evaluation of captured data and post-processing, not from any mathematical derivation, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or self-referential equations. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked in the provided text to support the central results. The comparison to simulations is supplementary and does not reduce the primary experimental metrics to inputs by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against physical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the work relies on standard assumptions of the PHD filter and experimental validity of the radar emulator; no explicit free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities are described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5724 in / 1081 out tokens · 50653 ms · 2026-05-18T04:44:52.900522+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Survey on Integrated Sensing and Communication Performance Modeling and Use Cases Feasibility,

    S. Mandelli, M. Henninger, M. Bauhofer, and T. Wild, “Survey on Integrated Sensing and Communication Performance Modeling and Use Cases Feasibility,” in2nd Int. Conf. 6G Netw., Oct. 2023, pp. 1–8

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual- Functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyond,

    F. Liuet al., “Integrated Sensing and Communications: Toward Dual- Functional Wireless Networks for 6G and Beyond,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, Mar. 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    OFDM Radar Algorithms in Mobile Communication Networks,

    K. M. Braun, “OFDM Radar Algorithms in Mobile Communication Networks,” Ph.D. dissertation, Karlsruher Institut f¨ur Technologie, 2014

    work page 2014

  4. [4]

    M. A. Richards, J. A. Scheer, and W. A. Holm,Principles of Modern Radar: Basic Principles. Raleigh, NC, USA: SciTech Pub., 2010

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    V oet al.,Multitarget Tracking

    B.-N. V oet al.,Multitarget Tracking. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    An Overview of Machine Learning Methods for Multiple Target Tracking,

    C.-Y . Chong, “An Overview of Machine Learning Methods for Multiple Target Tracking,” in24th Int. Conf. Inf. Fusion, Dec. 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    UA V-Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication: Tracking Design and Optimization,

    Y . Jiang, Q. Wu, W. Chen, and K. Meng, “UA V-Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication: Tracking Design and Optimization,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1024–1028, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Target Tracking with Integrated Sensing and Communications in IEEE 802.11bf,

    C.-L. Tai, J. Zhang, D. M. Blough, and R. Sivakumar, “Target Tracking with Integrated Sensing and Communications in IEEE 802.11bf,” in IEEE 99th Veh. Technol. Conf., 2024, pp. 1–5

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    An ISAC-ISAR Imaging and Tracking Method for Moving Target Sensing,

    S. Gui, H. Peng, Y . Xu, Z. Zhao, L. Fan, and Z. Tian, “An ISAC-ISAR Imaging and Tracking Method for Moving Target Sensing,” inIEEE Int. Conf. Signal, Inf. Data Process., 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Kalman Filtering based Target Tracking for Multistatic Sensing in ISAC Systems,

    Q. Yuan, S. Zhuge, Z. Lin, Y . Ma, and Y . Zeng, “Kalman Filtering based Target Tracking for Multistatic Sensing in ISAC Systems,” inIEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst.IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Deep Learning-Based Extended Target Tracking in ISAC Systems,

    Y . Wang, M. Tao, and S. Sun, “Deep Learning-Based Extended Target Tracking in ISAC Systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.00576, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Scalable Integrated Sensing and Communications for Multi-Target Detection and Tracking in Cell-Free Massive MIMO: A Unified Framework,

    S. Liesegang, S. Buzzi, and C. D’Andrea, “Scalable Integrated Sensing and Communications for Multi-Target Detection and Tracking in Cell-Free Massive MIMO: A Unified Framework,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.06703

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Integrated sensing and communication based outdoor multi-target detection, tracking, and localization in practical 5g networks,

    R. Liu, M. Jian, D. Chen, X. Lin, Y . Cheng, W. Cheng, and S. Chen, “Integrated sensing and communication based outdoor multi-target detection, tracking, and localization in practical 5g networks,”Intell. Converg. Netw., vol. 4, no. 3, p. 261–272, Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.23919/ICN.2023.0021

    work page doi:10.23919/icn.2023.0021 2023

  14. [14]

    6G Integrated Sensing and Communication: From Vision to Realization,

    T. Wild, A. Grudnitsky, S. Mandelli, M. Henninger, J. Guan, and F. Schaich, “6G Integrated Sensing and Communication: From Vision to Realization,” in20th Eur. Radar Conf., Sep. 2023, pp. 355–358

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Multipath Clutter Rejection for Digital Radio Mondiale-Based HF Passive Bistatic Radar with OFDM Waveform,

    Z. Zhao, X. Wan, Q. Shao, Z. Gong, and F. Cheng, “Multipath Clutter Rejection for Digital Radio Mondiale-Based HF Passive Bistatic Radar with OFDM Waveform,”IET Radar Sonar Navig., vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 867–872, 2012

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    CRAP: Clutter Removal with Acquisitions Under Phase Noise,

    M. Henninger, S. Mandelli, A. Grudnitsky, T. Wild, and S. ten Brink, “CRAP: Clutter Removal with Acquisitions Under Phase Noise,” in2nd Int. Conf. 6G Netw., Oct. 2023, pp. 1–8

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Target Detection for ISAC with TDD Transmission,

    M. Henninger, L. Giroto, S. Saur, A. Grudnitsky, T. Wild, and S. Man- delli, “Target Detection for ISAC with TDD Transmission,” in28th Int. ITG Workshop Smart Antennas, Sep. 2025, pp. 1–6

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    The Gaussian Mixture Probability Hypothesis Density Filter,

    B.-N. V o and W.-K. Ma, “The Gaussian Mixture Probability Hypothesis Density Filter,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 4091– 4104, 2006

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    Multitarget bayes filtering via first-order multitarget mo- ments,

    R. Mahler, “Multitarget bayes filtering via first-order multitarget mo- ments,”IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1152– 1178, 2003

    work page 2003

  20. [20]

    OSPA(2): Using the OSPA Metric to Evaluate Multi-Target Tracking Performance,

    M. Beard, B.-T. V o, and B.-N. V o, “OSPA(2): Using the OSPA Metric to Evaluate Multi-Target Tracking Performance,” inInt. Conf. Control Autom. Inf. Sci., 2017, pp. 86–91

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Multi-Target Localization in Multi-Static Integrated Sensing and Com- munication Deployments,

    M. Bauhofer, S. Mandelli, M. Henninger, T. Wild, and S. ten Brink, “Multi-Target Localization in Multi-Static Integrated Sensing and Com- munication Deployments,” in2nd Int. Conf. 6G Netw., 2023, pp. 1–4

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    The Cardinalized Probability Hypothesis Density Filter for Linear Gaussian Multi-Target Models,

    B.-T. V o, B.-N. V o, and A. Cantoni, “The Cardinalized Probability Hypothesis Density Filter for Linear Gaussian Multi-Target Models,” in40th Annu. Conf. Inf. Sci. Syst., 2006, pp. 681–686

    work page 2006