Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 58 references

Ground and excited potential energy surfaces for CaF+Ca interactions and isotope exchange reactions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For the ultracold CaF+Ca pair, an excited electronic state of the Ca2F trimer dips more than 1000 cm-1 below the ground-state collision threshold, opening a spin-orbit-driven route to atom-exchange chemistry.

desk verdict Solid first PESs for CaF+Ca; the excited-state dip below the ground asymptote is the one claim I'd want stress-tested before trusting. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.23303 v2 pith:YBXUGEI2 submitted 2025-10-27 physics.atom-ph cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.chem-ph

Dibyendu Sardar , John L. Bohn This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phcond-mat.quant-gasphysics.chem-ph PACS 31.15.Ar34.20.Cf34.50.Lf
keywords potentialenergysurfacesultracoldcollisionsCaFmoleculecalciumatomisotopeexchangereactionsmultireferenceconfigurationinteractionspin-orbitcouplingatom-exchangechemistry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper computes the potential energy surfaces that govern ultracold collisions between laser-cooled CaF molecules and calcium atoms. The ground-state surface is deep, anisotropic, and permits a barrierless isotope-exchange reaction: exchanging a heavier calcium isotope into the molecule releases 1-8 cm-1, while the reverse is endothermic. The central finding is that an excited state, (2)2A', correlated with Ca in its metastable 3P state, dips more than 1000 cm-1 below the ground-state asymptote in the linear Ca-F-Ca geometry. Because this excited state carries spin-orbit coupling from the 3P atom, the authors argue it can mix with ground-state bound and scattering states, opening a non-adiabatic reaction pathway. If correct, these surfaces give experimenters the input needed for scattering calculations and photoassociation searches.

What carries the argument

The central objects are two-dimensional surfaces V(R, theta) of the Ca2F trimer in Jacobi coordinates, with CaF treated as a rigid rotor for the ground state and relaxed for the excited state. The ground X 2A' surface uses CCSD(T); the nine excited surfaces use MRCI with a hand-selected active space (CaF HOMO, four lowest unoccupied orbitals, plus Ca 4s/4p/3d). Surfaces are expanded in Legendre polynomials to quantify anisotropy, and long-range C6,0 and C6,2 coefficients derive from dynamic polarizabilities. The load-bearing feature is the submerged (2)2A' surface: its dip below the ground asymptote, combined with spin-orbit coupling from metastable Ca(3P), is the proposed mechanism coupling

What would settle it

A converged multireference calculation with an enlarged active space (for example, including additional Rydberg or all valence orbitals) that moves the (2)2A' minimum above the ground asymptote, or a spectroscopic search that fails to find a Ca2F bound state below the CaF+Ca(1S) threshold in the linear geometry, would falsify the submerged-surface claim; an ultracold collision measurement that finds no enhanced reaction products when Ca is prepared in the metastable 3P state would also test it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that one of nine ab initio electronic states of Ca2F, the (2)2A' state arising from CaF(2Σ+)+Ca(3P), crosses below the ground-state CaF(2Σ+)+Ca(1S) asymptote by more than 1000 cm-1 at a linear geometry. The authors interpret this as enabling spin-orbit-mediated mixing between excited and ground rovibronic levels and the ground scattering continuum, potentially funneling metastable-channel population into ground-state products. They note that no direct crossings between entrance and exit surfaces were found and the excited-channel reaction was not tested for barrierlessness, so the pathway is a motivated possibility rather than a calculated rate. For the ground state,

Load-bearing premise

The hand-selected active space used for the excited-state MRCI calculations—CaF's HOMO plus four unoccupied orbitals plus Ca's 4s, 4p, and 3d—is what places the (2)2A' surface below the ground asymptote; if a larger or differently constructed active space shifts that surface upward, the submerged-state claim becomes a calculation artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ground-state CaF+Ca collisions are predicted to allow a barrierless isotope-exchange reaction, exothermic only when the product CaF contains the heavier calcium isotope, releasing 1-8 cm-1.
  • Because the exothermicity is far below the molecular vibrational spacing (581 cm-1) but above rotational spacings, product molecules should remain vibrationally cold but rotationally hot, allowing final-state-resolved detection.
  • The submerged (2)2A' surface suggests that spin-orbit coupling can mix the excited state with ground-state internal levels and unbound scattering states, offering a non-adiabatic pathway for reactions initiated in the CaF + Ca(3P) channel.
  • The published Legendre components and C6 coefficients provide quantitative input for coupled-channel scattering calculations of ultracold CaF+Ca collisions.
  • The isotope-exchange exothermicity (a few kelvin) is far above the characteristic van der Waals energy E* = 292 microkelvin, so the reaction is not in the quantum-threshold regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the submerged surface is physical, photoassociation spectroscopy near the CaF+Ca(1S) threshold should reveal bound or quasibound levels of Ca2F in the linear geometry; their positions would directly test the predicted dip.
  • A dedicated calculation of the spin-orbit coupling matrix element between (2)2A' and X 2A' would turn the qualitative pathway into a reactivity estimate; the paper does not compute this coupling.
  • The same active-space approach could be applied to AlF+Al, SrF+Sr, and BaF+Ba to see whether even deeper submerged surfaces are expected for heavier laser-coolable fluorides.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports ab initio potential energy surfaces for the CaF+Ca system, computed with CCSD(T) for the ground X2A' state and CASSCF/MRCI for nine excited states arising from the lowest three asymptotes, within the rigid-rotor approximation for CaF. The authors build 2D surfaces for the ground state and the (2)2A' state, extract Legendre moments and long-range C6 coefficients, and analyze isotope-exchange reactions. They find a barrierless ground-state atom-exchange path and claim that the (2)2A' surface, correlated with CaF(2Σ+)+Ca(3P), lies more than 1000 cm^-1 below the ground-state asymptote, which they propose may enable spin-orbit-driven non-adiabatic reactivity with metastable Ca(3P).

Significance. If the excited-state crossing is robust, this paper provides a valuable starting point for ultracold collision and photoassociation studies of CaF+Ca. The ground-state PES and Legendre components are directly usable in scattering calculations, and the C6 coefficients are derived from independent polarizability integrals, not fitted to the target result. The monomer benchmark calculations agree well with experiment. However, the central excited-state claim currently rests on an unvalidated MRCI asymptotic gap and a hand-selected active space, so the significance of the paper for the ultracold chemistry community depends on that validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II / Sec. III.D.2 (Fig. 5)] The claim that the (2)2A' surface lies more than 1000 cm^-1 below the CaF(2Σ+)+Ca(1S) asymptote is central to the paper. This placement is set entirely by the MRCI calculation with the active space described in Sec. II. The manuscript does not report the MRCI-computed Ca(3P)-Ca(1S) asymptotic splitting, nor does it state whether the plotted surfaces were shifted to the experimental value of 15315 cm^-1. MRCI is not size-consistent, and the chosen active space may describe Ca(3P) and Ca(1S) with unequal accuracy; a few-percent error in the asymptotic gap would erase the >1000 cm^-1 dip. Please provide the computed atomic excitation energy at the same active-space/basis level, compare it with experiment, and state whether the surfaces were shifted. A sensitivity test with a slightly larger active space would also bound the uncertainty.
  2. [Sec. III.D.1 (Fig. 4)] The barrierless ground-state isotope-exchange conclusion is obtained from a 2D PES in which the Ca-F-Ca angle is fixed at the equilibrium value (~138°) while r1 and r2 are varied. A barrier may appear for other angles. The Conclusions state that 'no barriers have been found along the reaction coordinates,' which overstates the evidence from this fixed-angle cut. Please either scan the bending angle, or explicitly restrict the claim to the fixed-angle geometry and adjust the abstract/conclusions accordingly.
  3. [Sec. III.D.2] The proposal that spin-orbit-driven rovibronic mixing opens a non-adiabatic pathway from CaF(2Σ+)+Ca(3P) to the ground electronic state is not substantiated by any calculation of spin-orbit coupling matrix elements or non-adiabatic coupling terms. As written, it is a plausible hypothesis, not a conclusion from the PES data. The authors themselves note that no direct surface crossings between entrance and exit channels were found. Recommend either softening the language to clearly label this as speculation, or adding an estimate of the spin-orbit coupling between (X)2A' and (2)2A' to support the proposed mechanism.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] Typos: 'chmeical' in Introduction; 'timer' for trimer in Sec. II; 'Winger' for Wigner in Sec. III.D.1; 'crosss' and 'indicateing' in Sec. III.D.2. Please proofread.
  2. [Eq. (3)] The notation 'α Cad2 CaF' is ambiguous. Use α_Ca d_CaF^2 to indicate the product of the calcium polarizability and the square of the CaF dipole moment.
  3. [Sec. II] The description of the optimal active space gives the orbitals included but not the number of active electrons. Specify the active-electron count to make the calculation reproducible.
  4. [Fig. 2] The caption does not identify the line styles or colors used for the various 2Σ, 2Π, 4Σ, and 4Π states. Add a legend or a table of line styles.
  5. [Table I] The ΔE values are presumably experimental asymptotic splittings. Clarify whether the calculations are referenced to these values or use the ab initio computed splittings; this is related to the major comment on asymptotic-gap validation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: ab initio PESs, ZPE-based isotope energetics, and polarizability-based C6 coefficients are derived from independent inputs rather than fitted to the claimed results.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce to its inputs. The ground-state PES is computed by CCSD(T) with counterpoise corrections; the excited-state PESs, including the (2)2A' surface that dips below the ground asymptote, are outputs of CASSCF/MRCI with an explicitly stated active space (CaF HOMO plus four LUMOs plus Ca 4s/4p/3d). No parameter is fitted to the target claim that this surface lies more than 1000 cm^-1 below the CaF(2Sigma+)+Ca(1S) asymptote, and the asymptotic gaps in Table I are independently known atomic/molecular excitation energies (15315, 16490, 20371 cm^-1). The isotope-exchange energetics are literally harmonic zero-point-energy differences built on an ab initio CaF force constant; the exothermic direction is a mathematical consequence of reduced mass, not a fitted result. The C6 coefficients are obtained from static and dynamic polarizabilities of Ca and CaF, benchmarked to literature static values, and are not adjusted to reproduce scattering data. Self-citations ([32], [39], [40], [55]) are contextual or comparative rather than load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem, forced ansatz, or fitted parameter is imported from them. The MRCI active-space sensitivity and possible size-consistency issues are legitimate correctness/validation risks, and the paper itself notes difficulty converging high-lying states and that it does not check whether the excited-state pathway is barrierless, but these are caveats about accuracy, not evidence of circularity. No step in the paper equates a predicted quantity with a fitted input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The calculation rests on standard quantum-chemistry methodology, a hand-selected active space, a rigid-rotor constraint, and the harmonic ZPE approximation. The fixed bond length and fixed reaction angle are chosen constraints that directly shape the reported numbers.

free parameters (2)
  • CaF bond length r_CaF (rigid-rotor constraint) = 3.695 bohr (experimental)
    Used in the Jacobi-coordinate PESs. Full-dimensional optimization elongates the bond to 4.001 bohr and changes the well depth by ~1572 cm^-1, so this hand-chosen constraint affects quantitative results.
  • Fixed Ca-F-Ca angle in reaction 2D PES = 138.38° (ground state) or 180° (excited state)
    The barrierless-isotope-exchange conclusion scans r1/r2 at a single fixed angle; angular motion is not explored, so the fixed angle is a chosen constraint that supports the no-barrier claim.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The fixed MRCI active space (CaF HOMO + four lowest unoccupied MOs + Ca 4s/4p/3d) is sufficient for convergence of all nine computed states.
    Introduced in Sec. II as an 'optimal AS' after initial calculations; the authors note high-lying states are difficult to converge, so the excited-state crossing could depend on this choice.
  • domain assumption CaF can be treated as a rigid rotor at r = 3.695 bohr for the 1D and 2D ground PESs.
    Used throughout Sec. II; Table II shows relaxing this changes the well depth by ~1572 cm^-1, so the fixed-bond approximation limits quantitative accuracy.
  • domain assumption The CaF potential is isotope-independent, so isotope effects enter only through the reduced-mass-dependent harmonic ZPE (Eqs. 7–8).
    Standard Born-Oppenheimer assumption combined with the harmonic approximation for zero-point energy; used to build Table III.
  • domain assumption CCSD(T) and MRCI with the stated basis sets give converged potential energy surfaces.
    No systematic basis-set extrapolation or error estimates are provided; benchmarking is limited to CaF monomer well depths.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ground and excited potential energy surfaces for CaF+Ca interactions and isotope exchange reactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YBXUGEI2

@misc{pith2026251023303,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ground and excited potential energy surfaces for CaF+Ca interactions and isotope exchange reactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YBXUGEI2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.23303}
}
abstract

We investigate the intermolecular interactions between laser-cooled CaF and Ca, in their ground and excited electronic states, aiming to understand atom-exchange reaction pathways. Using state-of-the-art \textit{ab initio} quantum chemistry methods, we compute potential energy surfaces for nine electronic states arising from the lowest three asymptotes of Ca$_2$F trimer, within the rigid rotor approximation applied to CaF. Two-dimensional potential energy surfaces are computed for the ground state and one of the excited states. We use a combination of the coupled cluster method restricted to single, double, and perturbative triple excitations, and the multireference configuration interaction method with single and double excitations. The ground (X)~$^2\mathrm{A}'$ electronic state of the trimer is significantly deep and highly anisotropic. The excited electronic states are also strongly bound. Notably, the potential energy surface of one of the excited states, (2)~$^2\mathrm{A}'$, lies below the ground-state asymptote of the trimer. By analyzing the potential energy surfaces, we discuss atom-exchange reaction pathways involving both the ground-state interaction between CaF and Ca and the excited metastable state of Ca.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.23303 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A schematic diagram of the CaF+Ca system in the Jacobi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. One-dimensional cuts of the potential energy surfaces for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. 2D PES and the corresponding Legendre components for the ground (X) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. 2D PES for atom exchange in the ground (X) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. 2D PES for the (2) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The direct chemical re- action CaF+Ca→Ca 2 + F is highly endothermic and ener- getically forbidden, attributed to the stronger binding energy of CaF compared to Ca2

    Ground 1S state of Ca We study chemical reactions in the CaF+Ca system to un- derstand possible reaction pathways. The direct chemical re- action CaF+Ca→Ca 2 + F is highly endothermic and ener- getically forbidden, attributed to the stronger binding energy of CaF compared to Ca2. Therefore, we focus on the isotope- exchange reactions between CaF and Ca. W...

    2000

  2. [2]

    The excited 3P state of Ca is a metastable state [44] and could be experimentally relevant to study excited state colli- sion dynamics in CaF+Ca

    Metastable 3P state of Ca We further investigate the atom-exchange reaction path- way between the ground state of CaF and the excited state of Ca. The excited 3P state of Ca is a metastable state [44] and could be experimentally relevant to study excited state colli- sion dynamics in CaF+Ca. The chemical reaction in the inci- dent channel, CaF( 2Σ+)+Ca(3P...

  3. [3]

    K. K. V oges, P. Gersema, M. Meyer zum Alten Borgloh, T. A. Schulze, T. Hartmann, A. Zenesini, and S. Ospelkaus, Ultracold gas of bosonic 23Na39K ground-state molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 083401 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    A. Yang, S. Botsi, S. Kumar, S. B. Pal, M. M. Lam, I. ˇCepait˙e, A. Laugharn, and K. Dieckmann, Singlet pathway to the ground state of ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 133203 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    M. Guo, B. Zhu, B. Lu, X. Ye, F. Wang, R. Vexiau, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, G. Qu ´em´ener, O. Dulieu, and D. Wang, Creation of an ultracold gas of ground-state dipolar 23Na87Rb molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 205303 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    J. W. Park, S. A. Will, and M. W. Zwierlein, Ultracold dipolar gas of fermionic 23Na40K molecules in their absolute ground state, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 205302 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    K.-K. Ni, S. Ospelkaus, M. De Miranda, A. P´eer, B. Neyenhuis, J. Zirbel, S. Kotochigova, P. Julienne, D. Jin, and J. Ye, A high phase-space-density gas of polar molecules, Science.322, 231 (2008)

    2008

  8. [8]

    P. K. Molony, P. D. Gregory, Z. Ji, B. Lu, M. P. K ¨oppinger, C. R. Le Sueur, C. L. Blackley, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cornish, Creation of ultracold 87Rb133Cs molecules in the rovibrational ground state, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 255301 (2014)

    2014

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Stevenson, A

    I. Stevenson, A. Z. Lam, N. Bigagli, C. Warner, W. Yuan, S. Zhang, and S. Will, Ultracold gas of dipolar NaCs ground state molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 113002 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    E. S. Shuman, J. F. Barry, and D. DeMille, Laser cooling of a diatomic molecule, Nature.467, 820 (2010)

    2010

  3. [11]

    Anderegg, B

    L. Anderegg, B. L. Augenbraun, Y . Bao, S. Burchesky, L. W. Cheuk, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Laser cooling of optically trapped molecules, Nat. Phys.14, 890 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    L. W. Cheuk, L. Anderegg, B. L. Augenbraun, Y . Bao, S. Burchesky, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle,Λ-enhanced imag- ing of molecules in an optical trap, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 083201 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Caldwell, J

    L. Caldwell, J. Devlin, H. Williams, N. Fitch, E. Hinds, B. Sauer, and M. Tarbutt, Deep laser cooling and efficient mag- netic compression of molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 033202 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    S. Ding, Y . Wu, I. A. Finneran, J. J. Burau, and J. Ye, Sub- doppler cooling and compressed trapping of YO molecules at µK temperatures, Phys. Rev. X.10, 021049 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Demille, Quantum Computation with Trapped Polar Molecules, Phys

    D. Demille, Quantum Computation with Trapped Polar Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 067901 (2002)

    2002

  8. [16]

    Yelin, K

    S. Yelin, K. Kirby, and R. C ˆot´e, Schemes for robust quantum computation with polar molecules, Phys. Rev. A.74, 050301 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, and K. R. Hazzard, Quantum com- putation and quantum simulation with ultracold molecules, Nat. Phys.20, 730 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Micheli, G

    A. Micheli, G. K. Brennen, and P. Zoller, A toolbox for lattice- spin models with polar molecules, Nat. Phys.2, 341 (2006)

    2006

  11. [19]

    M. A. Baranov, M. Dalmonte, G. Pupillo, and P. Zoller, Con- densed matter theory of dipolar quantum gases, Chem. Rev. 112, 5012 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    L. D. Carr and J. Ye, Focus on cold and ultracold molecules, New J. Phys.11, 055009 (2009)

    2009

  13. [21]

    DeMille, J

    D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, and A. O. Sushkov, Probing the fron- tiers of particle physics with tabletop-scale experiments, Sci- ence.357, 990 (2017)

    2017

  14. [23]

    Karman, M

    T. Karman, M. Tomza, and J. P ´erez-R´ıos, Ultracold chemistry 9 as a testbed for few-body physics, Nat. Phys.20, 722 (2024)

    2024

  15. [24]

    Ospelkaus, K.-K

    S. Ospelkaus, K.-K. Ni, D. Wang, M. De Miranda, B. Neyen- huis, G. Qu ´em´ener, P. Julienne, J. Bohn, D. Jin, and J. Ye, Quantum-state controlled chemical reactions of ultracold potassium-rubidium molecules, Science.327, 853 (2010)

    2010

  16. [25]

    M.-G. Hu, Y . Liu, D. D. Grimes, Y .-W. Lin, A. H. Gheorghe, R. Vexiau, N. Bouloufa-Maafa, O. Dulieu, T. Rosenband, and K.-K. Ni, Direct observation of bimolecular reactions of ultra- cold KRb molecules, Science.366, 1111 (2019)

    2019

  17. [26]

    Liu, M.-G

    Y . Liu, M.-G. Hu, M. A. Nichols, D. Yang, D. Xie, H. Guo, and K.-K. Ni, Precision test of statistical dynamics with state- to-state ultracold chemistry, Nature.593, 379 (2021)

    2021

  18. [27]

    Anderegg, S

    L. Anderegg, S. Burchesky, Y . Bao, S. S. Yu, T. Karman, E. Chae, K.-K. Ni, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Observation of microwave shielding of ultracold molecules, Science.373, 779 (2021)

    2021

  19. [28]

    Karman and J

    T. Karman and J. M. Hutson, Microwave shielding of ultracold polar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 163401 (2018)

    2018

  20. [29]

    Qu ´em´ener and J

    G. Qu ´em´ener and J. L. Bohn, Dynamics of ultracold molecules in confined geometry and electric field, Phys. Rev. A.83, 012705 (2011)

    2011

  21. [30]

    P. S. ˙Zuchowski and J. M. Hutson, Reactions of ultracold alkali- metal dimers, Phys. Rev. A.81, 060703 (2010)

    2010

  22. [31]

    Tomza, K

    M. Tomza, K. W. Madison, R. Moszynski, and R. V . Krems, Chemical reactions of ultracold alkali-metal dimers in the lowest-energy 3Σstate, Phys. Rev. A.88, 050701 (2013)

    2013

  23. [32]

    Ladjimi and M

    H. Ladjimi and M. Tomza, Chemical reactions of ultracold alkaline-earth-metal diatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. A.108, L021302 (2023)

    2023

  24. [33]

    M. P. Man, T. Karman, and G. C. Groenenboom, Ab initio study of the reactivity of ultracold RbSr+RbSr collisions, New J. Phys.24, 055001 (2022)

    2022

  25. [34]

    Sardar, A

    D. Sardar, A. Christianen, H. Li, and J. L. Bohn, Four-body sin- glet potential-energy surface for reactions of calcium monoflu- oride, Phys. Rev. A.107, 032822 (2023)

    2023

  26. [35]

    E. R. Meyer and J. L. Bohn, Chemical pathways in ultracold reactions of SrF molecules, Phys. Rev. A.83, 032714 (2011)

    2011

  27. [36]

    Tomza, Energetics and control of ultracold isotope- exchange reactions between heteronuclear dimers in external fields, Phys

    M. Tomza, Energetics and control of ultracold isotope- exchange reactions between heteronuclear dimers in external fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 063201 (2015)

    2015

  28. [37]

    M. B. Kosicki, D. Kedziera, and P. S. Zuchowski, Ab initio study of chemical reactions of cold SrF and CaF molecules with alkali-metal and alkaline-earth-metal atoms: The implications for sympathetic cooling, J. Phys. Chem. A.121, 4152 (2017)

    2017

  29. [38]

    D. Yang, J. Zuo, J. Huang, X. Hu, R. Dawes, D. Xie, and H. Guo, A global full-dimensional potential energy surface for the K 2Rb2 complex and its lifetime, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11, 2605 (2020)

    2020

  30. [39]

    Y . Liu, J. Huang, D. Yang, D. Xie, and H. Guo, Global full- dimensional potential energy surface for the reaction23Na87Rb + 23Na87Rb→23Na2 + 87Rb2 and the formation rate and life- time of the 23Na87 2 Rb2 collision complex, J. Phys. Chem. A. 126, 9008 (2022)

    2022

  31. [40]

    Christianen, T

    A. Christianen, T. Karman, R. A. Vargas-Hern ´andez, G. C. Groenenboom, and R. V . Krems, Six-dimensional potential en- ergy surface for NaK–NaK collisions: Gaussian process rep- resentation with correct asymptotic form, J. Chem. Phys.150, 064106 (2019)

    2019

  32. [41]

    Sardar and J

    D. Sardar and J. L. Bohn, Sticking lifetime of ultracold CaF molecules in triplet interactions, J. Phys. Chem. A.127, 4815 (2023)

    2023

  33. [42]

    Sardar, M

    D. Sardar, M. Gronowski, M. Tomza, and J. L. Bohn, CaF+ CaF interactions in the ground and excited electronic states: impli- cations for collisional losses, arXiv: 2506.16897 (2025)

    2025

  34. [43]

    Y .-X. Liu, L. Zhu, J. Luke, M. C. Babin, M. Gronowski, H. Ladjimi, M. Tomza, J. L. Bohn, T. V . Tscherbul, and K.-K. Ni, Hyperfine-to-rotational energy transfer in ultracold atom– molecule collisions of Rb and KRb, Nat. Chem.17, 688 (2025)

    2025

  35. [44]

    Karman, M

    T. Karman, M. Gronowski, M. Tomza, J. J. Park, H. Son, Y .-K. Lu, A. O. Jamison, and W. Ketterle, Ab initio calculation of the spectrum of feshbach resonances in NaLi + Na collisions, Phys. Rev. A.108, 023309 (2023)

    2023

  36. [45]

    da Silva, Q

    H. da Silva, Q. Yao, M. Morita, B. K. Kendrick, H. Guo, and N. Balakrishnan, The Li + CaF→Ca + LiF chemical reac- tion under cold conditions, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.25, 14193 (2023)

    2023

  37. [46]

    Furcinitti, L

    P. Furcinitti, L. Balling, and J. Wright, A measurement of the 3P1 metastable state in Ca, Phys. Lett. A.53, 75 (1975)

    1975

  38. [47]

    L. W. Cheuk, L. Anderegg, Y . Bao, S. Burchesky, S. Y . Scarlett, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Observation of colli- sions between two ultracold ground-state CaF molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 043401 (2020)

    2020

  39. [48]

    Werner, P

    H.-J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, F. R. Manby, J. A. Black, K. Doll, A. Heßelmann, D. Kats, A. K ¨ohn, T. Korona, D. A. Kreplin, Q. Ma, I. Miller, Thomas F., A. Mitrushchenkov, K. A. Peter- son, I. Polyak, G. Rauhut, and M. Sibaev, The Molpro quantum chemistry package, J. Chem. Phy...

    2020

  40. [49]

    L. A. Kaledin, J. C. Bloch, M. C. McCarthy, and R. W. Field, Analysis and deperturbation of the A 2Πand B 2Σ+ states of CaF, J. Mol. Spectrosc.197, 289 (1999)

    1999

  41. [50]

    J. G. Hill and K. A. Peterson, Gaussian basis sets for use in cor- related molecular calculations. XI. pseudopotential-based and all-electron relativistic basis sets for alkali metal (K–Fr) and alkaline earth (Ca–Ra) elements, J. Chem. Phys.147, 244106 (2017)

    2017

  42. [51]

    I. S. Lim, H. Stoll, and P. Schwerdtfeger, Relativistic small- core energy-consistent pseudopotentials for the alkaline-earth elements from Ca to Ra, J. Chem. Phys.124, 034107 (2006)

    2006

  43. [52]

    Aidas, C

    K. Aidas, C. Angeli, K. L. Bak, V . Bakken, R. Bast, L. Bo- man, O. Christiansen, R. Cimiraglia, S. Coriani, P. Dahle, E. K. Dalskov, U. Ekstr¨om, T. Enevoldsen, J. J. Eriksen, P. Ettenhu- ber, B. Fern´andez, L. Ferrighi, H. Fliegl, L. Frediani, K. Hald, A. Halkier, C. H ¨atti...

    2014

  44. [53]

    Derevianko, S

    A. Derevianko, S. G. Porsev, and J. F. Babb, Electric dipole polarizabilities at imaginary frequencies for hydrogen, the al- kali–metal, alkaline–earth, and noble gas atoms, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables96, 323 (2010)

    2010

  45. [54]

    Schwerdtfeger and J

    P. Schwerdtfeger and J. K. Nagle, 2018 table of static dipole polarizabilities of the neutral elements in the periodic table*, Mol. Phys.117, 1200 (2019)

    2018

  46. [55]

    Hou and P

    S. Hou and P. F. Bernath, Line list for the ground state of CaF, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf.210, 44 (2018)

    2018

  47. [56]

    Charron, B

    F. Charron, B. Guo, K. Zhang, Z. Morbi, and P. Bernath, High- 10 resolution infrared emission spectrum of CaF, J. Mol. Spec- trosc.171, 160 (1995)

    1995

  48. [57]

    Sardar, M

    D. Sardar, M. Gronowski, M. Tarbutt, J. M. Hutson, and M. Tomza, Interactions between CaF and Rb in ground and ex- cited electronic states: prospects for ultracold molecule-atom photoassociation, (Unpublish)

  49. [58]

    M. B. Kosicki, M. Borkowski, M. Umi ´nski, and P. S. ˙Zuchowski, Production of ultracold asymmetric tops from sr atoms and sroh molecules, arXiv:2508.14543 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  50. [59]

    Kramida, Y

    A. Kramida, Y . Ralchenko, and J. Reader, Team 2015 nist atomic spectra database (ver. 5.3), National Institute of Stan- dards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD (2018)

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.