pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.26085 · v2 · pith:B63U74NTnew · submitted 2025-10-30 · 🪐 quant-ph

Modeling of simple bandpass filters: bandwidth broadening of Josephson parametric devices due to non-Markovian coupling to dressed transmission-line modes

Rui Yang , Zheng Shi , Zhirong Lin , Waltraut Wustmann This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 03:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords Josephson parametric devicesbandpass filtersnon-Markovian dynamicsquantum Langevin equationself-energybandwidth broadeningcircuit QED
0
0 comments X

The pith

Non-Markovian coupling through bandpass filters broadens the bandwidth of Josephson parametric devices even off resonance.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Josephson parametric devices face an inherent gain-bandwidth trade-off that constrains their performance in superconducting quantum circuits. The paper performs a non-perturbative analysis of coupling circuits by treating the transmission line in terms of dressed modes and retains the full frequency dependence of the resulting coupling coefficients. This produces a non-Markovian quantum Langevin equation in which a frequency-dependent complex self-energy replaces the usual constant damping parameter, and the input-output relations are generalized accordingly. For elementary series-LC, parallel-LC, and combined bandpass networks, the calculated gain profiles exhibit strong modifications relative to the Markovian case. A reader would care because the approach demonstrates that simple, ideal filter elements can produce useful bandwidth increases in both resonant and off-resonant operating regimes.

Core claim

By retaining the full frequency dependence of the coupling in a circuit analysis of dressed transmission-line modes, the authors obtain a non-Markovian quantum Langevin equation whose damping is replaced by the frequency-dependent complex self-energy of the coupling. Exact self-energies extracted from series-LC, parallel-LC, and combined bandpass filter networks then yield generalized parametric gain factors whose profiles are strongly altered compared with Markovian predictions. Bandwidth broadening appears not only in the resonant regime where the self-energy has unity slope at the device frequency, but also in off-resonant regimes where the real part of the self-energy remains large.

What carries the argument

The frequency-dependent complex-valued self-energy of the coupling to dressed transmission-line modes, which replaces the single damping parameter in the non-Markovian quantum Langevin equation derived from bandpass filter networks.

If this is right

  • Input-output relations and unitarity conditions are generalized consistently for frequency-dependent coupling.
  • Gain profiles are modified such that bandwidth increases occur at maintained gain for the studied filter networks.
  • Broadening is obtained in off-resonant regimes where the real part of the self-energy is large, in addition to the resonant case.
  • Elementary series and parallel LC elements suffice to produce the reported effect.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same non-Markovian treatment could be applied to design more elaborate filter networks that further increase bandwidth.
  • The framework offers a route to model other circuit-QED components whose coupling is strongly frequency dependent.
  • Direct experimental tests would involve comparing measured gain curves against the self-energy predictions for controlled filter parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The exact self-energies derived from ideal series-LC, parallel-LC, and combined bandpass filter networks fully capture the non-Markovian dynamics without additional losses or higher-order effects.

What would settle it

Fabricate a Josephson parametric device coupled through one of the elementary bandpass networks, measure its gain-versus-frequency curve at an off-resonant operating point, and compare the observed bandwidth to the prediction from the frequency-dependent self-energy; absence of the predicted extra broadening would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.26085 by Rui Yang, Waltraut Wustmann, Zheng Shi, Zhirong Lin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A (nonlinear) lumped element resonator (e.g. a JPA) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: This section summarizes the main results of our [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Self-energy Σ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Pump-parameter space ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Pump-parameter space ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Self-energy Σ(∆) (upper panels) and para [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Performance of degenerate parametric amplifier cou [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Self-energy Σ(∆) (upper panels) and para [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. A resonator coupled to the end of a TL (one-port setup) via a series- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. A resonator coupled to the end of a TL (one-port setup) via a parallel- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. A resonator coupled to the end of a TL (one-port setup) via a simple ladder filter, consisting of a series- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Self energy Σ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Josephson parametric devices are widely used in superconducting quantum computing research but suffer from an inherent gain-bandwidth trade-off. This limitation is partly overcome by coupling the device to its input/output transmission line via a bandpass filter, leading to wider bandwidth at undiminished gain. Here we perform a non-perturbative circuit analysis in terms of dressed transmission-line modes for representative resonant coupling circuits, going beyond the weak-coupling treatment. The strong frequency dependence of the resulting coupling coefficients implies that the Markov approximation commonly employed in cQED analysis is inadequate. By retaining the full frequency dependence of the coupling, we arrive at a non-Markovian form of the quantum Langevin equation with the frequency-dependent complex-valued self-energy of the coupling in place of a single damping parameter. We also consistently generalize the input-output relations and unitarity conditions. Using the exact self-energies of elementary filter networks -- a series- and parallel-LC circuit and a simple representative bandpass filter consisting of their combination -- we calculate the generalized parametric gain factors. Compared with their Markovian counterpart, these gain profiles are strongly modified. We find bandwidth broadening not only in the established parameter regime, where the self-energy of the coupling is in resonance with the device and its real part has unity slope, but also within off-resonant parameter regimes where the real part of the self-energy is large. Our results offer insight for the bandwidth engineering of Josephson parametric devices using simple coupling networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a non-perturbative circuit analysis of Josephson parametric devices coupled to transmission lines through elementary bandpass filters (series-LC, parallel-LC, and their combination). It derives frequency-dependent complex self-energies Σ(ω) from dressed transmission-line modes, replaces the constant damping rate in the quantum Langevin equation with this self-energy to obtain a non-Markovian form, generalizes the input-output relations and unitarity conditions, and computes the resulting parametric gain profiles. The central claim is that these profiles exhibit bandwidth broadening relative to the Markovian case both in the resonant regime (where Re[Σ(ω)] has unity slope) and in off-resonant regimes where Re[Σ(ω)] is large.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work supplies an explicit, reproducible route to non-Markovian gain calculations for simple coupling networks that directly addresses the gain-bandwidth trade-off in Josephson parametric amplifiers. The use of exact self-energies from lumped-element circuits rather than perturbative or fitted models is a clear strength; the results could guide hardware design for wider-bandwidth readout in superconducting quantum processors.

major comments (1)
  1. [Off-resonant regimes] Off-resonant regimes section: The claim that bandwidth broadening persists where Re[Σ(ω)] is large is obtained by direct substitution of the ideal, lossless LC-filter self-energies into the generalized gain expressions. No quantitative estimate is given for how this broadening shifts under small resistive losses, stray inductances, or frequency-dependent perturbations to Σ(ω), which directly affects the practical relevance of the off-resonant result.
minor comments (2)
  1. The exact circuit topology and component values for the 'combined bandpass filter' are referenced in the abstract but would benefit from an explicit diagram or table in the main text to allow immediate reproduction of the self-energy expressions.
  2. Notation for the generalized input-output relations should be cross-referenced to the corresponding Markovian limits to make the reduction explicit.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comment. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Off-resonant regimes] Off-resonant regimes section: The claim that bandwidth broadening persists where Re[Σ(ω)] is large is obtained by direct substitution of the ideal, lossless LC-filter self-energies into the generalized gain expressions. No quantitative estimate is given for how this broadening shifts under small resistive losses, stray inductances, or frequency-dependent perturbations to Σ(ω), which directly affects the practical relevance of the off-resonant result.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The analysis in the manuscript employs exact self-energies derived from ideal, lossless lumped-element circuits in order to obtain closed-form results and to isolate the consequences of frequency-dependent coupling without additional modeling assumptions. The reported bandwidth broadening in off-resonant regimes follows directly from the large real part of these ideal self-energies. We agree that a quantitative assessment of the effect under small resistive losses or stray elements would improve the practical relevance of the off-resonant findings. In the revised manuscript we will add a short discussion, including a first-order perturbative estimate, showing that the broadening remains robust when the loss rates are small compared with the relevant frequency scales set by the filter and device resonances. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation computes self-energies from circuits then substitutes into Langevin equation

full rationale

The paper performs direct circuit analysis on ideal series-LC, parallel-LC, and combined bandpass networks to obtain exact frequency-dependent self-energies Σ(ω). These are substituted into the non-Markovian quantum Langevin equation (retaining full frequency dependence of the coupling) and generalized input-output relations to compute parametric gain factors. Bandwidth broadening in both resonant and off-resonant regimes follows from this substitution rather than from any fit, self-definition, or self-citation chain. No parameters are tuned to the target result, no uniqueness theorem is imported from prior author work, and no ansatz is smuggled via citation. The analysis remains self-contained within the stated ideal lumped-element model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard circuit quantization and the validity of the dressed-mode expansion; no new particles or forces are introduced, but several modeling choices are required.

free parameters (1)
  • filter component values (L, C)
    Specific inductance and capacitance values in the series-LC, parallel-LC, and bandpass networks are chosen to illustrate resonant and off-resonant regimes.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Markov approximation is inadequate because of strong frequency dependence of the coupling coefficients.
    Invoked to justify the non-Markovian Langevin equation.
  • domain assumption The transmission line can be treated via dressed modes whose self-energies are exactly those of the elementary filter networks.
    Basis for the non-perturbative circuit analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5807 in / 1371 out tokens · 46650 ms · 2026-05-18T03:45:16.652483+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (17) for the system coupled via a series-LCcircuit to a TL, as shown in Fig

    Diagonalization of dressed TL Hamiltonian Here we derive the Hamiltonian Eq. (17) for the system coupled via a series-LCcircuit to a TL, as shown in Fig. 1(a). In this analyis, we diagonalize the TL part of the coupled system, and as a result we obtain the dressed TL modes Eqs. (14)–(16) which satisfy the orthogonality conditions Eqs. (11)–(12). This anal...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (23) and its weak-coupling limit

    Coupling constants We briefly comment on the coupling coefficient Eq. (23) and its weak-coupling limit. Focusing on the system frequencyω k =ω s, we can expressf ωs/v in terms of the wave functionu ωs/v(0) at the end of the TL: fωs/v =− r vΓeff E 2 uωs/v(0) =− r vΓeff E π 1 + 2Γeff E Z0 ωsZs −1/2 .(B36) where we have defined an effective coupling strength...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Diagonalization of dressed TL Hamiltonian Here we derive the Hamiltonian for the system coupled via a parallel-LCcircuit to a TL, as shown in Fig. 1(b). In this analyis, we diagonalize the TL part of the coupled system, and as a result we obtain the dressed TL modes Eqs. (32)–(34) which satisfy the orthogonality conditions Eqs. (30)–(31). This analysis is...

    work page

  4. [4]

    (18), where here the system frequency and impedance are ωs = r Ls +L c CsLsLc (C32) Zs = s LsLc Cs(Ls +L c) ,(C33) as determined byH sys, Eq

    Coupling constants We introduce the system amplitudea s as in Eq. (18), where here the system frequency and impedance are ωs = r Ls +L c CsLsLc (C32) Zs = s LsLc Cs(Ls +L c) ,(C33) as determined byH sys, Eq. (C26). Using also the TL mode amplitudesa k from Eq. (21), the Hamiltonian, Eq. (C25) then reads H=H sys + Z ∞ 0 dkℏωka† kak +ℏ Z ∞ 0 dk h (f(Cc) k +...

    work page

  5. [5]

    β α −2 kv ωs 2 − ωs ω0 kv ωs 4 + 3ω0 ωs # + ω0 ωs

    ParallelC c −L c coupling In App. C we had derived the coupling coefficients for the case of parallel-LCcoupling, cf. Eqs. (C40) and (C30), f2 k = v 2π q 2Γ(Cc) E q kv ωs − q 2Γ(Lc) E p ωs kv 2 1 + [αk−1/(βk)] 2 (E5) whereα= CcCs (Cs+Cc)C0 ,β= Lc L0 , and whereω s,Z s and Γ(Cc) E , Γ(Lc) E are defined in Eqs. (C32)–(C33) and Eqs. (C37)– (C38). The couplin...

    work page

  6. [6]

    In this limit,ω s andZ s from Eqs

    Capacitive coupling The purely capacitive coupling is a special case of the parallel-LCcoupling, obtained in the limitL c, β→ ∞. In this limit,ω s andZ s from Eqs. (C32), (C33) reduce toω s := 1/ √LsCs andZ s = p Ls/Cs, while Γ (Lc) E →0 and Γeff E →Γ (Cc) E , cf. Eqs. (C37)–(C39). The coupling coefficients of Eq. (E5) then become f2 k = 2Γeff E v2k 2πωs ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    In this limit,ω s andZ s from Eqs

    Inductive coupling The purely inductive coupling is a special case of the parallel-LCcoupling, obtained in the limitC c, α→0. In this limit,ω s andZ s from Eqs. (C32), (C33) remain unchanged, while Γ (Cc) E →0 and Γ eff E →Γ (Lc) E , cf. Eqs. (C37)–(C39). The coupling coefficients of Eq. (E5) then read f2 k = 2Γeff E ωs 2πk 1 1 + 1/(β2k2) (E39) They are b...

    work page

  8. [8]

    II A 2 we had derived the coupling coefficients for the case of series-LCcoupling, f2 k = 1 CsZ0 ωs 2πk 1 1 + (βk−1/(αk)) 2 ,(E44) cf

    SeriesC c −L c coupling In Sec. II A 2 we had derived the coupling coefficients for the case of series-LCcoupling, f2 k = 1 CsZ0 ωs 2πk 1 1 + (βk−1/(αk)) 2 ,(E44) cf. Eqs. (23) and (15). Here,α= CcCs (Cs+Cc)C0 ,β= Lc L0 , and andω s,Z s are given in Eqs. (19)–(20). The coupling constantsf k are bounded and thus divergence free, as seen in Im ˆΣ(ω)∝ |f k=ω...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Simple ladder filter: series-C g −L g plus parallel-C c −L c circuit In App. D we had derived the coupling coefficientsf k for the case of the simple ladder filter, consisting of a series circuit (with parametersC g, Lg), followed by a parallel circuit (with parametersC c, Lc), as seen from the system side, f2 k = vZ0 2πZa vk 1 + [αk−1/(βk)] 2 (E62) cf. E...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Aumentado, Superconducting parametric amplifiers: The state of the art in josephson parametric amplifiers, IEEE Microw

    J. Aumentado, Superconducting parametric amplifiers: The state of the art in josephson parametric amplifiers, IEEE Microw. Mag.21, 45 (2020). 42

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    A. A. Clerk, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, F. Marquardt, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1155 (2010)

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gus- tavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits, Appl. Phys. Rev.6, 021318 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    M. A. Castellanos-Beltran and K. W. Lehnert, Widely tunable parametric amplifier based on a superconducting quantum interference device array resonator, Appl. Phys. Lett.91, 083509 (2007)

    work page 2007

  14. [14]

    M. A. Castellanos-Beltran, K. Irwin, G. Hilton, L. Vale, and K. Lehnert, Amplification and squeezing of quantum noise with a tunable josephson metamaterial, Nat. Phys. 4, 929 (2008)

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    Yamamoto, K

    T. Yamamoto, K. Inomata, M. Watanabe, K. Matsuba, T. Miyazaki, W. D. Oliver, Y. Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, Flux-driven josephson parametric amplifier, Appl. Phys. Lett.93, 042510 (2008)

    work page 2008

  16. [16]

    Walter, P

    T. Walter, P. Kurpiers, S. Gasparinetti, P. Mag- nard, A. Potoˇ cnik, Y. Salath´ e, M. Pechal, M. Mondal, M. Oppliger, C. Eichler, and A. Wallraff, Rapid high- fidelity single-shot dispersive readout of superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl.7, 054020 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    K. M. Sliwa, M. Hatridge, A. Narla, S. Shankar, L. Frun- zio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Reconfigurable josephson circulator/directional amplifier, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041020 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    B. J. Chapman, E. I. Rosenthal, J. Kerckhoff, B. A. Moores, L. R. Vale, J. A. B. Mates, G. C. Hilton, K. La- lumi` ere, A. Blais, and K. W. Lehnert, Widely tunable on-chip microwave circulator for superconducting quan- tum circuits, Phys. Rev. X7, 041043 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Lecocq, L

    F. Lecocq, L. Ranzani, G. A. Peterson, K. Cicak, R. W. Simmonds, J. D. Teufel, and J. Aumentado, Nonreciprocal microwave signal processing with a field- programmable josephson amplifier, Phys. Rev. Appl.7, 024028 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Lecocq, L

    F. Lecocq, L. Ranzani, G. A. Peterson, K. Cicak, X. Y. Jin, R. W. Simmonds, J. D. Teufel, and J. Aumentado, Efficient qubit measurement with a nonreciprocal mi- crowave amplifier, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 020502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    B. Abdo, O. Jinka, N. T. Bronn, S. Olivadese, and M. Brink, High-fidelity qubit readout using interfero- metric directional josephson devices, PRX Quantum2, 040360 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Yurke, P

    B. Yurke, P. G. Kaminsky, R. E. Miller, E. A. Whittaker, A. D. Smith, A. H. Silver, and R. W. Simon, Observa- tion of 4.2-k equilibrium-noise squeezing via a josephson- parametric amplifier, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 764 (1988)

    work page 1988

  23. [23]

    Eichler, D

    C. Eichler, D. Bozyigit, C. Lang, M. Baur, L. Steffen, J. M. Fink, S. Filipp, and A. Wallraff, Observation of two-mode squeezing in the microwave frequency domain, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 113601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    J. Y. Qiu, A. Grimsmo, K. Peng, B. Kannan, B. Lien- hard, Y. Sung, P. Krantz, V. Bolkhovsky, G. Calusine, D. Kim, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, J. Yoder, M. E. Schwartz, T. P. Orlando, I. Siddiqi, S. Gustavsson, K. P. O’Brien, and W. D. Oliver, Broadband squeezed mi- crowaves and amplification with a josephson travelling- wave parametric amplifier, Nat....

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Bergeal, F

    N. Bergeal, F. Schackert, M. Metcalfe, R. Vijay, V. Manucharyan, L. Frunzio, D. Prober, R. Schoelkopf, S. Girvin, and M. Devoret, Phase-preserving amplifica- tion near the quantum limit with a josephson ring mod- ulator, Nature465, 64 (2010)

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    Naaman and J

    O. Naaman and J. Aumentado, Synthesis of parametri- cally coupled networks, PRX Quantum3, 020201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    S. L. Braunstein and P. van Loock, Quantum informa- tion with continuous variables, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 513 (2005)

    work page 2005

  28. [28]

    Flurin, N

    E. Flurin, N. Roch, F. Mallet, M. H. Devoret, and B. Huard, Generating entangled microwave radiation over two transmission lines, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 183901 (2012)

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    K. V. Petrovnin, M. R. Perelshtein, T. Korkalainen, V. Vesterinen, I. Lilja, G. S. Paraoanu, and P. J. Hako- nen, Generation and structuring of multipartite entangle- ment in a josephson parametric system, Adv. Quantum Technol.6, 2200031 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Wustmann and V

    W. Wustmann and V. Shumeiko, Parametric resonance in tunable superconducting cavities, Phys. Rev. B87, 184501 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Wustmann and V

    W. Wustmann and V. Shumeiko, Nondegenerate para- metric resonance in a tunable superconducting cavity, Phys. Rev. Appl.8, 024018 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Svensson, A

    I.-M. Svensson, A. Bengtsson, P. Krantz, J. Bylander, V. Shumeiko, and P. Delsing, Period-tripling subhar- monic oscillations in a driven superconducting resonator, Phys. Rev. B96, 174503 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Svensson, A

    I.-M. Svensson, A. Bengtsson, J. Bylander, V. Shumeiko, and P. Delsing, Period multiplication in a parametrically driven superconducting resonator, Appl. Phys. Lett.113, 022602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Z. Lin, K. Inomata, K. Koshino, W. Oliver, Y. Naka- mura, J.-S. Tsai, and T. Yamamoto, Josephson paramet- ric phase-locked oscillator and its application to disper- sive readout of superconducting qubits, Nat. Commun. 5, 4480 (2014)

    work page 2014

  35. [35]

    E. I. Rosenthal, C. M. F. Schneider, M. Malnou, Z. Zhao, F. Leditzky, B. J. Chapman, W. Wustmann, X. Ma, D. A. Palken, M. F. Zanner, L. R. Vale, G. C. Hilton, J. Gao, G. Smith, G. Kirchmair, and K. W. Lehnert, Ef- ficient and low-backaction quantum measurement using a chip-scale detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 090503 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Siddiqi, R

    I. Siddiqi, R. Vijay, F. Pierre, C. M. Wilson, M. Met- calfe, C. Rigetti, L. Frunzio, and M. H. Devoret, Rf- driven josephson bifurcation amplifier for quantum mea- surement, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 207002 (2004)

    work page 2004

  37. [37]

    Mallet, F

    F. Mallet, F. R. Ong, A. Palacios-Laloy, F. Nguyen, P. Bertet, D. Vion, and D. Esteve, Single-shot qubit read- out in circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nat. Phys.5, 791 (2009)

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    Krantz, A

    P. Krantz, A. Bengtsson, M. Simoen, S. Gustavsson, V. Shumeiko, W. Oliver, C. Wilson, P. Delsing, and J. Bylander, Single-shot read-out of a superconducting qubit using a josephson parametric oscillator, Nat. Com- mun.7, 11417 (2016)

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a kerr-cat qubit, Nature584, 205 (2020)

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    X. He, Y. Lu, D. Bao, H. Xue, W. Jiang, Z. Wang, A. Roudsari, P. Delsing, J. Tsai, and Z. Lin, Fast genera- tion of schr¨ odinger cat states using a kerr-tunable super- conducting resonator, Nat. Commun.14, 6358 (2023). 43

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    S. Puri, C. K. Andersen, A. L. Grimsmo, and A. Blais, Quantum annealing with all-to-all connected nonlinear oscillators, Nat. Commun.8, 15785 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Macklin, K

    C. Macklin, K. O’brien, D. Hover, M. Schwartz, V. Bolkhovsky, X. Zhang, W. Oliver, and I. Siddiqi, A near–quantum-limited josephson traveling-wave para- metric amplifier, Science350, 307 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    T. C. White, J. Y. Mutus, I.-C. Hoi, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, C. Neill, P. J. J. O’Malley, P. Roushan, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, S. Chaudhuri, J. Gao, and J. M. Marti- nis, Traveling wave parametric amplifier with josephson junctions using minimal resonator phase matchi...

    work page 2015

  44. [44]

    Y. Chen, D. Sank, P. O’Malley, T. White, R. Barends, B. Chiaro, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, M. Mariantoni, A. Megrant, C. Neill, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, Y. Yin, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Multiplexed dispersive readout of superconducting phase qubits, Appl. Phys. Lett.101, 182601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  45. [45]

    Jerger, S

    M. Jerger, S. Poletto, P. Macha, U. H¨ ubner, E. Il’ichev, and A. V. Ustinov, Frequency division multiplexing read- out and simultaneous manipulation of an array of flux qubits, Appl. Phys. Lett.101, 042604 (2012)

    work page 2012

  46. [46]

    B. J. Chapman, E. I. Rosenthal, J. Kerckhoff, L. R. Vale, G. C. Hilton, and K. W. Lehnert, Single-sideband modu- lator for frequency domain multiplexing of superconduct- ing qubit readout, Appl. Phys. Lett.110, 162601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    T. Roy, S. Kundu, M. Chand, A. M. Vadiraj, A. Ranadive, N. Nehra, M. P. Patankar, J. Aumen- tado, A. A. Clerk, and R. Vijay, Broadband parametric amplification with impedance engineering: Beyond the gain-bandwidth product, Appl. Phys. Lett.107, 262601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  48. [48]

    J. Y. Mutus, T. C. White, R. Barends, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, E. Jeffrey, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, C. Neill, P. J. J. O’Malley, P. Roushan, D. Sank, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, K. M. Sundqvist, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Strong environmental coupling in a josephson parametric amplifier, Appl. Phys. Lett.104, 263513 (2014)

    work page 2014

  49. [49]

    Grebel, A

    J. Grebel, A. Bienfait, E. Dumur, H.-S. Chang, M.-H. Chou, C. R. Conner, G. A. Peairs, R. G. Povey, Y. P. Zhong, and A. N. Cleland, Flux-pumped impedance- engineered broadband josephson parametric amplifier, Appl. Phys. Lett.118, 142601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    P. Duan, Z. Jia, C. Zhang, L. Du, H. Tao, X. Yang, L. Guo, Y. Chen, H. Zhang, Z. Peng, W. Kong, H.- O. Li, G. Cao, and G.-P. Guo, Broadband flux-pumped josephson parametric amplifier with an on-chip coplanar waveguide impedance transformer, Appl. Phys.Express 14, 042011 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    White, A

    T. White, A. Opremcak, G. Sterling, A. Korotkov, D. Sank, R. Acharya, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, J. C. Bardin, A. Bengtsson, A. Bourassa, J. Bo- vaird, L. Brill, B. B. Buckley, D. A. Buell, T. Burger, B. Burkett, N. Bushnell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, J. Co- gan, R. Collins, A. L. Crook, B. Curtin, S. Demura, A. Dunsworth, C. Erickson, R. Fatemi, L. F. Bur-...

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Gardiner and P

    C. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum Noise: A Handbook of Markovian and Non-Markovian Quantum Stochastic Methods with Applications to Quantum Optics, Springer Series in Synergetics (Springer Berlin, 2004)

    work page 2004

  53. [53]

    Bruus and K

    H. Bruus and K. Flensberg,Many-body quantum theory in condensed matter physics: an introduction(Oxford university press, 2004)

    work page 2004

  54. [54]

    Parra-Rodriguez, E

    A. Parra-Rodriguez, E. Rico, E. Solano, and I. L. Egusquiza, Quantum networks in divergence-free circuit qed, Quantum Sci. Technol.3, 024012 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    K. A. Matveev, D. Yue, and L. I. Glazman, Tunneling in one-dimensional non-luttinger electron liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 3351 (1993)

    work page 1993

  56. [56]

    D. Yue, L. I. Glazman, and K. A. Matveev, Conduc- tion of a weakly interacting one-dimensional electron gas through a single barrier, Phys. Rev. B49, 1966 (1994)

    work page 1966

  57. [57]

    S. Lal, S. Rao, and D. Sen, Junction of several weakly in- teracting quantum wires: A renormalization group study, Phys. Rev. B66, 165327 (2002)

    work page 2002

  58. [58]

    S. Das, S. Rao, and D. Sen, Renormalization group study of the conductances of interacting quantum wire sys- tems with different geometries, Phys. Rev. B70, 085318 (2004)

    work page 2004

  59. [59]

    Y. V. Nazarov and L. I. Glazman, Resonant tunneling of interacting electrons in a one-dimensional wire, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 126804 (2003)

    work page 2003

  60. [60]

    D. G. Polyakov and I. V. Gornyi, Transport of interact- ing electrons through a double barrier in quantum wires, Phys. Rev. B68, 035421 (2003)

    work page 2003

  61. [61]

    Shi and I

    Z. Shi and I. Affleck, Fermionic approach to junctions of multiple quantum wires attached to tomonaga-luttinger liquid leads, Phys. Rev. B94, 035106 (2016)

    work page 2016

  62. [62]

    Shi and Y

    Z. Shi and Y. Komijani, Conductance of closed and open long aharonov-bohm-kondo rings, Phys. Rev. B95, 075147 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    Ranzani and J

    L. Ranzani and J. Aumentado, Graph-based analysis of nonreciprocity in coupled-mode systems, New J. Phys. 17, 023024 (2015)

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    H. Yan, X. Wu, A. Lingenfelter, Y. J. Joshi, G. Anders- son, C. R. Conner, M.-H. Chou, J. Grebel, J. M. Miller, R. G. Povey, H. Qiao, A. A. Clerk, and A. N. Cleland, Broadband bandpass purcell filter for circuit quantum electrodynamics, Appl. Phys. Lett.123, 134001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    Z. R. Lin, K. Inomata, W. D. Oliver, K. Koshino, Y. Nakamura, J. S. Tsai, and T. Yamamoto, Single- shot readout of a superconducting flux qubit with a flux- driven josephson parametric amplifier, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 132602 (2013)

    work page 2013

  66. [66]

    Vijay, D

    R. Vijay, D. H. Slichter, and I. Siddiqi, Observation of quantum jumps in a superconducting artificial atom, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 110502 (2011). 44

    work page 2011

  67. [67]

    Simoen, C

    M. Simoen, C. W. S. Chang, P. Krantz, J. Bylander, W. Wustmann, V. Shumeiko, P. Delsing, and C. M. Wil- son, Characterization of a multimode coplanar waveguide parametric amplifier, Journal of Applied Physics118, 154501 (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    Bengtsson, P

    A. Bengtsson, P. Krantz, M. Simoen, I.-M. Svensson, B. Schneider, V. Shumeiko, P. Delsing, and J. Bylan- der, Nondegenerate parametric oscillations in a tunable superconducting resonator, Phys. Rev. B97, 144502 (2018)

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    Yurke, Input-output theory, inQuantum Squeezing, edited by P

    B. Yurke, Input-output theory, inQuantum Squeezing, edited by P. Drummond and Z. Fizek (Springer, 2004) pp. 53–96

    work page 2004

  70. [70]

    Although one can calculate the integralR ∞ −∞ using the non-diverging semicircle, this is in general of little help to determine R ∞ 0

    Because of the oscillating factor, the contour integral along either the upper or lower semicircle with radius → ∞diverges. Although one can calculate the integralR ∞ −∞ using the non-diverging semicircle, this is in general of little help to determine R ∞ 0 . While a branch cut trick would in principle allow to calculate R ∞ 0 , it also leads to divergen...

    work page

  71. [71]

    Nayfeh and D

    A. Nayfeh and D. Mook,Nonlinear Oscillations, Wiley Classics Library (Wiley, 2008)

    work page 2008

  72. [72]

    with Ceff =C s +C c for the purely capacitive coupling

    If the combined Hamiltonians are instead approximated in the usual weak-coupling approximation and with coupling-independent TL modes, then the coupling in- duced frequency shifts may take other forms, e.g. with Ceff =C s +C c for the purely capacitive coupling

    work page

  73. [73]

    Terminating the TL with a capacitor of sizeC 0awill apparently remove the singularity. However, the resulting Hamiltonian becomes pathological in the continuum limit a→0, unless Φ a is integrated into the TL part of the Hamiltonian which is equivalent to our treatment in this appendix

    work page

  74. [74]

    Jeffreys and B

    H. Jeffreys and B. Jeffreys,Methods of Mathematical Physics, Cambridge Mathematical Library (Cambridge University Press, 1999)

    work page 1999