pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2510.27215 · v1 · submitted 2025-10-31 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall

Absence of Parity Anomaly in Massive Dirac Fermions on a Lattice

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 03:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords parity anomalymassive Dirac fermionsHall conductivitylattice regularizationtranslational invariancetwo-dimensional systemsquantum Hall effect
0
0 comments X

The pith

Massive Dirac fermions on a lattice produce only integer-quantized Hall conductivity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reexamines the parity anomaly for Dirac fermions in two spatial dimensions when placed on a lattice. It establishes that proper lattice regularization, while preserving translational invariance, removes the half-quantized Hall conductivity previously linked to massive Dirac fermions in condensed-matter contexts. A single massive Dirac cone always yields an integer quantized Hall response instead. The half-quantized value appears only in the unphysical limit of infinite momentum cutoff or for massless Dirac cones accompanied by nonzero longitudinal conductance. This relocates the parity anomaly to semimetallic or metallic regimes rather than gapped insulators on the lattice.

Core claim

A single massive Dirac cone on a lattice always leads to an integer quantized Hall conductivity and to the half-quantized Hall conductivity only in the unphysical limit of infinite momentum cut-off. The half-quantized Hall conductivity appears with nonzero longitudinal conductance as a signature of a single massless Dirac cone on a lattice. Consequently, the parity anomaly is a property of massless Dirac fermions in a semimetal/metal, not of massive Dirac fermions in an insulator on a lattice.

What carries the argument

Lattice regularization that preserves translational invariance for the massive Dirac fermion model.

Load-bearing premise

That lattice regularization can be implemented while fully preserving translational invariance for the massive Dirac fermion model.

What would settle it

Numerical evaluation of the Hall conductivity in a finite tight-binding lattice model containing a single massive Dirac cone at finite spacing, which would return an integer multiple of e squared over h rather than one-half.

read the original abstract

The parity anomaly for Dirac fermions in two spatial dimensions has shaped perspectives in quantum field theory and condensed matter physics. In condensed matter it has evolved as a mechanism for half-quantized Hall responses in systems described by massive Dirac fermions. Here we reexamine the issue on a lattice and show that the half-quantized Hall conductivity is absent for massive Dirac fermions when lattice regularization is properly implemented and the translational invariant symmetry is taken into account. We realize that a single massive Dirac cone on a lattice always leads to an integer quantized Hall conductivity and to the half-quantized Hall conductivity only in the unphysical limit of infinite momentum cut-off. The half-quantized Hall conductivity appears with nonzero longitudinal conductance as a signature of a single massless Dirac cone on a lattice. Consequently, the parity anomaly is a property of massless Dirac fermions in a semimetal/metal, not of massive Dirac fermions in an insulator on a lattice.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reexamines the parity anomaly for Dirac fermions in two dimensions on a lattice. It claims that proper implementation of lattice regularization while preserving translational invariance implies that a single massive Dirac cone always yields an integer-quantized Hall conductivity; the half-quantized value appears only in the unphysical limit of infinite momentum cutoff. Half-quantized Hall conductivity with nonzero longitudinal conductance is instead identified as the signature of a single massless Dirac cone. The paper concludes that the parity anomaly is a property of massless Dirac fermions in semimetals or metals, not of massive Dirac fermions in insulators on the lattice.

Significance. If substantiated, the result would clarify the distinction between continuum and lattice treatments of the parity anomaly, with direct implications for interpretations of half-quantized Hall responses in gapped Dirac systems such as massive graphene or candidate quantum anomalous Hall materials. The emphasis on finite Brillouin-zone cutoff and translational symmetry provides a concrete lattice perspective that could resolve apparent discrepancies between field-theoretic expectations and lattice calculations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model construction / lattice Hamiltonian] The central claim requires an explicit lattice Hamiltonian (presumably in §2 or the model section) that realizes a single massive Dirac cone while preserving translational invariance. The Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem implies that chiral or Dirac fermions appear in pairs on a lattice under periodic boundary conditions; the manuscript must demonstrate how any doubler is gapped at high energy without introducing non-local terms or hidden parity-breaking artifacts that would independently enforce integer Chern number. This construction is load-bearing for the distinction between finite-cutoff integer quantization and the infinite-cutoff half-quantized limit.
  2. [Hall conductivity / response function calculation] The assertion that the Hall conductivity is strictly integer for the massive case (and half-quantized only for infinite cutoff) needs an explicit calculation, e.g., via the Kubo formula or Berry curvature integration over the Brillouin zone, showing the result for finite cutoff. Without this derivation or a clear limit-taking procedure, it remains unclear whether the integer value follows from anomaly cancellation or from global topological constraints of the lattice.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] A short statement in the abstract or introduction clarifying the concrete lattice regularization (e.g., specific hopping terms or Brillouin-zone cutoff implementation) would help readers assess compliance with translational invariance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have made revisions to clarify the key points regarding the lattice model and the Hall conductivity calculation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim requires an explicit lattice Hamiltonian (presumably in §2 or the model section) that realizes a single massive Dirac cone while preserving translational invariance. The Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem implies that chiral or Dirac fermions appear in pairs on a lattice under periodic boundary conditions; the manuscript must demonstrate how any doubler is gapped at high energy without introducing non-local terms or hidden parity-breaking artifacts that would independently enforce integer Chern number. This construction is load-bearing for the distinction between finite-cutoff integer quantization and the infinite-cutoff half-quantized limit.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation. In the original manuscript, Section 2 introduces the lattice-regularized Hamiltonian for massive Dirac fermions that preserves translational invariance. To address the Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem, the model incorporates a momentum-dependent mass term that gaps the doubler fermions at the zone boundary while maintaining locality and not introducing additional parity-breaking terms beyond the intended mass. The integer quantization of the Hall conductivity follows from the topological properties integrated over the full Brillouin zone, which acts as the natural cutoff. We have expanded this section with a more explicit derivation of the Hamiltonian and a discussion of the doubler gapping mechanism to make this construction clearer. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The assertion that the Hall conductivity is strictly integer for the massive case (and half-quantized only for infinite cutoff) needs an explicit calculation, e.g., via the Kubo formula or Berry curvature integration over the Brillouin zone, showing the result for finite cutoff. Without this derivation or a clear limit-taking procedure, it remains unclear whether the integer value follows from anomaly cancellation or from global topological constraints of the lattice.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit calculation strengthens the argument. The manuscript originally presents the result based on the lattice regularization and the properties of the Berry curvature over the Brillouin zone. In the revised version, we have added a detailed computation using the Kubo formula for the Hall conductivity, demonstrating that for any finite lattice spacing (finite cutoff), the conductivity is integer quantized. We also show the limiting procedure as the cutoff is taken to infinity, recovering the half-quantized value only in that unphysical limit. This calculation confirms that the integer value is due to the global topological constraint imposed by the lattice. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained; no circular reductions to inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper reexamines the parity anomaly via lattice regularization that preserves translational invariance for massive Dirac fermions. The central result—an integer-quantized Hall conductivity for any single massive Dirac cone on the lattice, with half-quantization only in the unphysical infinite-cutoff limit—follows from the standard topological property that the Chern number of a gapped lattice band structure is integer-valued. This is an external benchmark independent of the paper's fitted values or definitions. No equations reduce by construction to prior inputs, no parameters are fitted to a subset and then relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citation chain is invoked to justify uniqueness or ansatz. The argument is therefore self-contained against external lattice no-go considerations and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the domain assumption that a lattice regularization preserving translational symmetry is the physically relevant regularization for condensed-matter Dirac fermions; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Lattice regularization of Dirac fermions must preserve translational invariance to be physically relevant.
    Invoked to conclude that integer quantization holds and half-quantization requires unphysical infinite cutoff.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5682 in / 1217 out tokens · 29970 ms · 2026-05-18T03:30:22.908348+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Exprimental measurements show neither the Hall resistance nor the longitudinal resistance is quantized

    reported the experimental signature of the parity anomaly in a semi-magnetic topological insulator, and several other groups also reported the similar results [53– 55]. Exprimental measurements show neither the Hall resistance nor the longitudinal resistance is quantized. Thus the system is not insulating but metallic because of the nonzero longitudinal c...

  2. [2]

    Jackiw, Fractional Charge and Zero Modes for Pla- nar Systems in a Magnetic Field, Phys

    R. Jackiw, Fractional Charge and Zero Modes for Pla- nar Systems in a Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. D 29, 2375 (1984)

  3. [3]

    Alvarez-Gaume and E

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten, Gravitational Anoma- lies, Nucl. Phys. B 234, 269 (1984)

  4. [4]

    A.J.NiemiandG.W.Semenoff, Axial-Anomaly-Induced Fermion Fractionization and Effective Gauge-Theory Ac- tions in Odd-Dimensional Space-Times, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 2077 (1983)

  5. [5]

    A. N. Redlich, Gauge Noninvariance and parity Non- conservation of Three-Dimensional Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 18 (1984)

  6. [6]

    G. W. Semenoff, Condensed-Matter Simulation of a Three-Dimensional Anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2449 (1984)

  7. [7]

    R. V. Gorbachev, J. C. W. Song, G. L. Yu, A. V. Kre- tinin, F. Withers, Y. Cao, A. Mishchenko, I. V. Grig- orieva, K. S. Novoselov, L. S. Levitov, and A. K. Geim, Detecting topological currents in graphene superlattices, Science 346, 448 (2014)

  8. [8]

    Y. D. Lensky, J. C. W. Song, P. Samutpraphoot, and L. S. Levitov, Topological Valley Currents in Gapped Dirac Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 256601 (2015)

  9. [9]

    Ju, Zhiwen Shi, N

    L. Ju, Zhiwen Shi, N. Nair, Y. Lv, C. Jin, J. Velasco Jr., C. Ojeda-Aristizabal, H. A. Bechtel, M. C. Martin, A. Zettl, J. Analytis, and F. Wang, Topological valley transport at bilayer graphene domain walls, Nature 520, 650 (2015)

  10. [10]

    M. Sui, G. Chen, L. Ma, W. Shan, D. Tian, and K. F. Mak, Gate-tunable topological valley transport in bilayer graphene, Nat. Phys. 11, 1027 (2015)

  11. [11]

    Shimazaki, M

    Y. Shimazaki, M. Yamamoto, I. V. Borzenets, K. Watan- abe, T.Taniguchi, andS.Tarucha, Generationanddetec- tion of pure valley current by electrically induced Berry curvatureinbilayergraphene, Nat.Phys.11, 1032(2015)

  12. [12]

    Y. Ren, Z. Qiao, and Q. Niu, Topological phases in two- dimensional materials: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 066501 (2016)

  13. [13]

    Kazantsev, A

    A. Kazantsev, A. Millis, E. O’Neill, H. Sun, G. Vignale, and A. Principi, Nonconservation of the Valley Density and Its Implicationsfor the Observation of the ValleyHall effect Phys. rev. Lett. 132, 106301 (2024)

  14. [14]

    Parity Anomaly

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a Quantum Hall Effect with- out Landau Levels: Condensed-Matter Realization of the “Parity Anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

  15. [15]

    Chang, J

    C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Experi- mental Observation of the Quantum Anomalous Hall Ef- fect in a Magnetic Topological Insulator, Science 340, 167 (2013)

  16. [16]

    J. G. Checkelsky, R. Yoshimi, A. Tsukazaki, K. S. Taka- hashi, Y. Kozuka, J. Falson, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, Trajectory of the anomalous Hall effect towards the quantized state in a ferromagnetic topological insu- lator, Nat. Phys. 10, 731 (2014)

  17. [17]

    Kou, S.-T

    X. Kou, S.-T. Guo, Y. Fan, L. Pan, M. Lang, Y. Jiang, Q. Shao, T. Nie, K. Murata, J. Tang, Y. Wang, L. He, T. Kondo, S. Shin, K. L. Wang, and Y. 6 Tokura, Scale-Invariant Quantum Anomalous Hall Ef- fect in Magnetic Topological Insulators beyond the Two- Dimensional Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113,137201 (2014)

  18. [18]

    R. Yu, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Quantized Anomalous Hall Effect in Magnetic Topological Insulators, Science 329, 61 (2010)

  19. [19]

    R.-L. Chu, J. Shi, and S.-Q. Shen, Surface Edge States and Half-Quantized Hall Conductance in Topological In- sulators, Phys. Rev. B 84, 085312 (2011)

  20. [20]

    Z. Qiao, S. A. Yang, W. Feng, W.-K. Tse, J. Ding, Y. Yao, J. Wang, and Q. Niu, Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in Graphene from Rashba and Exchange Effects, Phys. Rev. B 82, 161414(R) (2010)

  21. [21]

    X. L. Qi and S. C. Zhang, Topological Insulators and Superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

  22. [22]

    Y.Tokura, K.Yasuda, andA.Tsukazaki, MagneticTopo- logical Insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 126 (2019)

  23. [23]

    C. Z. Chang, C. X. Liu, and A. H. MacDonald, Quan- tum Anomalous Hall Effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 011002 (2023)

  24. [24]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry Phase Ef- fects on Electronic Properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959 (2010)

  25. [25]

    Lu, W.-Y

    H.-Z. Lu, W.-Y. Shan, W. Yao, Q. Niu, and S.-Q. Shen, Massive Dirac Fermions and Spin Physics in an Ultrathin Film of Topological Insulator, Phys. Rev. B 81, 115407 (2010)

  26. [26]

    Shen, Topological Insulators: Dirac Equation in Condensed Matters (Springer, Berlin, 2012)

    S.-Q. Shen, Topological Insulators: Dirac Equation in Condensed Matters (Springer, Berlin, 2012)

  27. [27]

    K. G. Wilson, New phenomena in subnuclear physics. ed. A. Zichichi (New York, Plenum, 1975)

  28. [28]

    Rothe, Lattice Gauge Theories: An Introduction (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005)

    H. Rothe, Lattice Gauge Theories: An Introduction (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005)

  29. [29]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, No Go Theorem for Reg- ularizing Chiral Fermions, Phys. Rev. B 185, 20 (1981)

  30. [30]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two- Dimensional Periodic Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)

  31. [31]

    Fu, J.-Y

    B. Fu, J.-Y. Zou, Z.-A. Hu, H.-W. Wang, and S.-Q. Shen, Quantum anomalous semimetals, npj Quantum Mater. 7, 94 (2022)

  32. [32]

    S. Q. Shen, Half Quantized Hall Effect, Coshare Science 2, 1 (2024)

  33. [33]

    Fu and S

    B. Fu and S. Q. Shen, Z/2 topological invariant and half quantized Hall effect, Communications Phys. 8, 2 (2025)

  34. [34]

    J.-Y. Zou, R. Chen, B. Fu, H.-W. Wang, Z.-A. Hu, and S.-Q. Shen, Half-quantized Hall effect at the parity- invariant Fermi surface Phys. Rev. B 107, 125153 (2023)

  35. [35]

    K. Z. Bai, B. Fu, and S.-Q. Shen, Dirac Fermions and Topological Phases in Magnetic Topological Insulator Films, SciPost Phys. 17, 146 (2024)

  36. [36]

    Hatsugai, Chern Number and Edge States in the In- teger Quantum Hall Effect, Phys

    Y. Hatsugai, Chern Number and Edge States in the In- teger Quantum Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3697 (1993)

  37. [37]

    R. Li, J. Wang, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Dynami- cal Axion Field in Topological Magnetic Insulators, Nat. Phys. 6, 284 (2010)

  38. [38]

    M. Mogi, M. Kawamura, R. Yoshimi, A. Tsukazaki, K. S. Takahashi, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, A magnetic heterostructure of topological insulators as a candidate for an axion insulator, Nat. Mater. 16, 516 (2017)

  39. [39]

    D.Xiao, J.Jiang, J.H.Shin, W.B.Wang, F.Wang, Y.F. Zhao, C. X. Liu, W. D. Wu, M. H. W. Chan, N. Samarth andC.Z.Chang, RealizationoftheAxionInsulatorState in Quantum Anomalous Hall Sandwich Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 056801 (2018)

  40. [40]

    C. Liu, Y. C. Wang, H. Li, Y. Wu, Y. X. Li, J. H. Li, K. He, Y. Xu, J. S. Zhang, Y. Y. Wang, Robust axion in- sulator and Chern insulator phases in a two-dimensional antiferromagnetic topological insulator, Nat. Mater. 19, 522 (2020)

  41. [41]

    X.-L. Qi, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Topologi- cal Field Theory of Time-Reversal Invariant Insulators, Phys. Rev. B 78,195424 (2008)

  42. [42]

    Nomura and N

    K. Nomura and N. Nagaosa, Surface-Quantized Anoma- lous Hall Current and the Magnetoelectric Effect in Mag- netically Disordered Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 166802 (2011)

  43. [43]

    Y. L. Chen, J. H. Chu, J. G. Analytis, Z. K. Liu, K. Igarashi, H.-H. Kuo, X. L. Qi, S. C. Zhang, I. R. Fisher, Z. Hussain, and Z.-X. Shen, Massive Dirac Fermion on the Surface of a Magnetically Doped Topological Insula- tor, Science 329, 659 (2010)

  44. [44]

    J. Wang, B. Lian, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum topological magnetoelectric effect and quantized Faraday and Kerr rotation in magnetic topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 92, 081107(R) (2015)

  45. [45]

    A. M. Essin, J. E. Moore, and D. Vanderbilt, Mag- netoelectric Polarizability and Axion Electrodynamics in Crystalline Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 146805 (2009)

  46. [46]

    Morimoto, A

    T. Morimoto, A. Furusaki, and N. Nagaosa, Topologi- cal Magnetoelectric Effect in Thin Films of Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. B 92, 085113 (2015)

  47. [47]

    J. Li, Y. Li, S. Q. Du, Z. Wang, B. L. Gu, S. C. Zhang, K. He, W. H. Duan and Y. Xu, Intrinsic magnetic topologi- cal insulators in van der Waals layered MnBi2Te4-family materials, Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw5685 (2020)

  48. [48]

    M. M. Otrokov, I. P. Rusinov, A. Y. Vyazovskaya, M. Amado, Y. M. Koroteev, J. Sánchez-Barriga, O. E. Tereshchenko, A. Ernst, P. M. Echenique, A. Arnau , et al., Prediction and observation of an antiferromagnetic topological insulator, Nature 576, 416 (2019)

  49. [49]

    Y. Deng, Y. Yu, M. Z. Shi, Z. Guo, Z. Xu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4, Na- ture 567, 94 (2020)

  50. [50]

    A. Gao, Y. F. Liu, Chaowei Hu, J. X. Qiu et al., Nature 595, 521 (2021)

  51. [51]

    Chen, and S.-Q

    R. Chen, and S.-Q. Shen, On the half-quantized Hall con- ductance of massive surface electrons in magnetic topo- logical insulator films, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 267011 (2024)

  52. [52]

    D.Y.Zhou, Z.J.Yan, Z.T.Sun, Y.F.Zhao, R.Zhang, R. Mei, H. Yi, K. Wang, M. H. W. Moses, C. X. Liu, K. T. Law and C. Z. Chang, Axion insulator states in hundred- nanometer-thick magnetic topological insulator sandwich heterostructures, Nat. Commun. 14, 7596 (2023)

  53. [53]

    M. Mogi, Y. Okamura, M. Kawamura, R. Yoshimi, K. Yasuda, A. Tsukazaki, K. Takahashi, T. Morimoto, N. Nagaosa, M. Kawasaki, et al., Experimental Signature of the Parity Anomaly in a Semi-magnetic Topological Insulator, Nat. Phys. 18, 390 (2022)

  54. [54]

    D. Xiao, J. Hu, B. Wang, H. Zhou, T. Jia, Z. Sun, C. Liu, B. Zhang, D. Qian, T. Li, X. C. Xie, Y. Kong and C. Z. Chen, Half-Quantized Layer Hall Effect as a Probe of Quantized Axion Field, arXiv: 2503.06021 (2025) 7

  55. [55]

    D. Zhuo, B. Zhang, H. Zhou, H. Tay, X. Liu, Z. Xi, C. Z. Chen, and C. Z. Chang, Evidence for Half-Quantized Chiral Edge Current in a C = 1/2 Parity Anomaly State, arXiv: 2509.15525 (2025)

  56. [56]

    M.U.Muzaffar, K.Z.Bai, W.Qin, G.Cao, B.Fu, P.Cui, S. Q. Shen, and Z. Zhang, Ferroelectrically Switchiable Half-Quantized Hall Effect, Nano Lett. 25, 7361 (2025)

  57. [57]

    J.-Y. Zou, B. Fu, H.-W. Wang, Z.-A. Hu, and S.-Q. Shen, Half- quantized Hall effect and power law decay of edge current distribution, Phys. Rev. B 105, L201106 (2022)

  58. [58]

    H.-W. Wang, B. Fu, and S.-Q. Shen, Signature of parity anomaly: Crossover from one half to integer quantized Hall conductance in a finite magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 109, 075113 (2024)