Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 173 references

Equipping non-terrestrial platforms with fluid antennas—antennas whose radiating element moves among preset ports—can deliver diversity, multiplexing, security, and energy-efficiency gains that fixed antennas cannot.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 00:29 UTC pith:XUPSFGZI

load-bearing objection A useful map of FA-assisted NTNs, but the central gain claims inherit rich-scattering assumptions that often don't hold in satellite and aerial links, and the paper needs mechanical fixes. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2511.00569 v2 pith:XUPSFGZI submitted 2025-11-01 cs.NI eess.SP

Advancing Fluid Antenna-Assisted Non-Terrestrial Networks in 6G and Beyond: Fundamentals, State of the Art, and Future Directions

classification cs.NI eess.SP
keywords fluid antennanon-terrestrial networks6Gmovable antennafluid antenna multiple accesschannel state information estimationjoint optimizationphysical layer security
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper is a survey, and its load-bearing claim is that pairing fluid antennas with non-terrestrial networks is not just another optimization trick but a coherent 6G direction. Fluid antennas reshape a wireless channel by moving a radiating element among closely spaced ports within a small region, selecting the position with the best gain or SINR; the survey argues this added degree of freedom translates into higher diversity and multiplexing gains, lower power use, and stronger security than fixed-position antennas can offer. It reviews the evidence across hovering and mobile UAV networks, satellite networks, combinations with technologies like cell-free MIMO, full-duplex, NOMA, and reconfigurable intelligent surfaces, and integrated sensing/communication/computation, plus physical-layer security. The reader is meant to come away convinced that FA-assisted NTNs can mitigate the dynamic fading, interference, and energy constraints of 6G non-terrestrial links.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim to be established is that the positional flexibility of fluid antennas converts the spatial variations of an NTN channel into usable diversity, multiplexing, and security gains. The survey presents FA port selection as an additional degree of freedom: with N ports distributed over a wavelength-scale region, the receiver (or transmitter) chooses the port maximizing channel gain or SINR, and the resulting gains—including no outage floor as N grows—are claimed to carry over to UAV, HAP, and satellite links when FA positions, beamforming, power, and platform motion are jointly optimized. It extends this to fluid antenna multiple access (FAMA), where pe

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is port selection under spatial correlation. A fluid antenna samples N ports in a small region; the channels at those ports are modeled as correlated Rayleigh fading using Bessel/Jakes spatial correlation (or eigen-decomposition of a correlation matrix), and the system moves the radiating element to the port with maximum channel gain or SINR. This mechanism underlies the diversity and multiplexing gains, and it is what the survey's reviewed optimization works exploit: alternating optimization, successive convex approximation, particle swarm, and deep reinforcement learning jointly adjust FA positions, beamforming vectors, transmit power, and platform trajectory. Th

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the spatial-correlation channel models borrowed from terrestrial fluid-antenna work—Bessel/Jakes correlations and rich-scattering Rayleigh or eigen-decomposition models—describe real non-terrestrial links, and that the antenna hardware can move and switch ports fast enough with fresh CSI to exploit those correlations.

What would settle it

A measurement campaign on a UAV-to-ground or LEO downlink that compares outage probability and achievable rate of a reconfigurable fluid-antenna prototype against a fixed antenna of the same size would settle the claim: if the measured spatial correlation makes port selection no better than fixed selection, or if movement latency exceeds the channel coherence time, the survey's transferable gains fail. A less expensive falsifier is a simulation that replaces the Bessel correlation model with a measured or ray-traced air-to-ground correlation matrix and checks whether the no-outage-floor divers

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the survey's claims hold, NTN links can compensate for Doppler, path loss, and interference by repositioning antennas instead of adding RF chains or transmit power, which matters for energy-constrained UAVs and satellites.
  • FAMA would let a single base station serve hundreds or thousands of users on the same time-frequency resource without requiring transmitter-side CSI, directly addressing spectrum scarcity in satellite and aerial networks.
  • Jointly optimizing FA positions with platform trajectories and beamforming should improve minimum and sum rates relative to fixed-antenna baselines in hovering UAV, mobile UAV, and LEO satellite scenarios.
  • AI-based CSI reconstruction from a few ports makes real-time port selection plausible in fast-changing air-to-ground channels, though the survey notes practical inference-speed limits.
  • Physical-layer security and covert communication can be enhanced by FA position choices, but the survey leaves open the case where eavesdroppers also use FAs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the claims are shaped by terrestrial rich-scattering channel models; the strongest test of the survey's thesis is a measurement of spatial correlation on real LEO or UAV links, because if satellite channels are too LoS-dominated or too sparse, port-selection gains may shrink.
  • Editorial inference: symbol-level FAMA assumes switching fast enough to track instantaneous fades; practical mechanical or liquid latency might push systems toward slow-FAMA or statistical CSI, changing the tradeoffs the survey summarizes.
  • Editorial inference: the same position-flexibility argument could extend to alignment problems in high-frequency (THz or optical) inter-satellite links, where beam alignment is the bottleneck and moving a small aperture might be cheaper than steering a large array.
  • Editorial inference: a direct testable extension is to replace the Bessel correlation kernel with a measured or ray-traced air-to-ground correlation matrix and check whether the no-outage-floor diversity result survives.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This survey reviews fluid antenna (FA)-assisted non-terrestrial networks (NTNs) for 6G. It covers NTN platform fundamentals, FA hardware and spatial-correlation channel models, AI-based CSI estimation, joint optimization of FA positions/beamforming/trajectories in hovering UAV, mobile UAV, and satellite networks, compatibility with cell-free massive MIMO, full-duplex, NGMA/NOMA/FAMA, and RIS, integrated sensing/communication/computation architectures, physical-layer security and covert communication, and future directions including AI, THz, near-field, and ISCC. The paper's central claim is that FAs can provide higher diversity, multiplexing, energy efficiency, and security gains than fixed-position antennas in NTNs, and that FA-assisted NTNs are a coherent and maturing research direction. The survey contributes a synthesis and taxonomy rather than a new proof.

Significance. If taken as a state-of-the-art synthesis, the survey is timely and useful: it is, to my knowledge, the first survey devoted specifically to FA-assisted NTNs, and it consolidates a rapidly growing body of work (175 references), including recent optimization papers, security results, and intelligent-function-integration architectures. The structured taxonomy, summary tables, and figures provide a good entry point for researchers. The main weakness is that the survey's headline claim -- that FA gains transfer to NTNs -- is presented without the channel-model and hardware caveats that the survey itself partially acknowledges. Because the work is a survey, this is a framing issue rather than an internal inconsistency, but it affects the central message and should be corrected before publication.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section II-C / III-A, Eq. (14)] The diversity and multiplexing advantages of FAs are derived from rich-scattering Rayleigh/Jakes models (Eqs. (2)-(5), (8)-(9), (14)). In the NTN channels described by the survey itself -- e.g., the LoS probability model in Eq. (18) and the air-to-ground geometry of Section III-A -- links are frequently LoS-dominated or have a very small angular spread. Under such conditions, port correlations approach unity and the diversity order in Eq. (14) collapses to roughly one regardless of N. The abstract and conclusion nevertheless state the gains as established ('higher channel diversity and multiplexing gains'; 'unlock the enormous potential of 6G') without the rich-scattering qualifier. The only finite-scattering results shown (Fig. 12, Rician K=7 with two scattered paths) are still not representative of LoS-dominated satellite links. This is a load-bearing framing issue: the survey should e
  2. [Section IV-A-1 / V-C-2] The survey acknowledges practical limitations at several points -- e.g., 'high mechanical latency' in Section IV-A-1 and the statement that f-FAMA 'currently confines it to the theoretical simulation stage' in Section V-C-2 -- but these admissions are not integrated into the abstract or conclusion, which recommend FA-assisted NTNs as a maturing path. The reviewed performance gains assume port switching and CSI acquisition at speeds and accuracies that may be incompatible with NTN dynamics, Doppler shifts, and the latency constraints described in Section I-B. A survey of this scope should include a dedicated critical assessment of hardware feasibility, movement latency, CSI staleness, and the impact of these constraints on the summarized gains, and should temper the central claims accordingly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section VII-A] The sentence 'The FA-assisted UAV can also serve as a friendly jammer to ensure secure communication between Bob and Alice' is duplicated. Also, 'legitimate the transmitter' should read 'the legitimate transmitter.'
  2. [Eq. (20)] The Doppler phase-shift expression is malformed: 'sin β T' appears to be a typo (likely sin β(t) or a missing variable). In Eq. (15), 'τ_LoS and τ_LoS' should presumably be 'τ_LoS and τ_NLoS.'
  3. [Fig. 13 caption / Section V-C-2] The caption of Fig. 13 attributes s-FAMA results to reference [102], but [102] is the movable-antenna satellite beam-coverage paper; the text correctly cites [115] for s-FAMA. This citation mismatch should be corrected, and other figure captions citing specific references should be checked.
  4. [Fig. 1 caption / Section II-B-1] Minor language issues: 'An potential FA-assisted NTN architecture' should be 'A potential...'; 'we uses a µ' should be 'we use a µ'; 'spacial' should be 'spatial.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: survey reports externally checkable prior results; self-citations are not load-bearing in the derivation sense.

full rationale

This is a survey paper, not a derivation. Its central claim that FAs provide diversity/multiplexing gains in NTNs is supported by cited peer-reviewed papers (e.g., [9], [16], [51], [102], [116]) rather than by an argument that reduces to its own assumptions. The spatial-correlation models (Eqs. (2)-(9)) are explicitly attributed to prior literature and state their assumptions (Jakes/Bessel, Rayleigh rich scattering); Eq. (14) is presented as a quoted upper bound from [9], not derived anew, so there is no fitted parameter relabeled as prediction and no equation that is equivalent to its input by construction. The text repeatedly flags the main limitations that would bear on external validity: 'the updates of FA positions in every channel coherence time result in rapid instantaneous CSI changes and high mechanical latency' (Sec. IV-A-1), mechanically MAs have 'movement response time and spatial coupling' issues (Sec. II-B-3), and f-FAMA 'relies on instantaneous CSI and symbol-level port switching, which currently confines it to the theoretical simulation stage' (Sec. V-C-2). These caveats are correctness/robustness concerns for the surveyed gains, not evidence of circularity. Although many foundational FA references are by the authors (Wong, New, Zhu, Wu et al.), the survey does not invoke a uniqueness theorem or hidden ansatz from those papers to force its organizational conclusion; the cited results have independent, falsifiable content with stated assumptions. Hence no circular step is identifiable under the requested standard.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its conclusions rest on channel modeling assumptions inherited from the cited FA and UAV literature, plus the general assumption that the survey represents those citations accurately.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption FA port channels follow the Jakes/Clarke correlation model, with correlation coefficient μ_n = J0(2π(n−1)W/(N−1)) (Eqs. (3)-(5)).
    Used throughout Section II-B to quantify FA diversity gains; assumes rich isotropic scattering and small port spacing.
  • domain assumption LoS/NLoS pathloss with LoS probability Pr_LoS(t) = 1/(1 + a exp(−b(θ(t)−a))) (Eq. (18)) describes air-to-ground NTN channels.
    Imported from UAV channel literature and used in Section III-A for channel modeling of FA-assisted NTNs.
  • domain assumption NLoS channel matrix follows the 2-D FA eigen-decomposition H = Q_rx Λ_rx^(1/2) G Λ_tx^(1/2) Q_tx^H (Eq. (9)).
    Assumes the spatial correlation matrix is known and decomposable; basis for summarizing several optimization results.
  • domain assumption The survey faithfully represents the cited results.
    The survey does not re-derive results; its educational value depends on accurate summaries and citations, which is imperfect (e.g., Fig. 13 caption).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 47960 in / 8445 out tokens · 92691 ms · 2026-08-04T00:29:40.383620+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

With the surging demand for ultra-reliable, low-latency, and ubiquitous connectivity in Sixth-Generation (6G) networks, Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTNs) emerge as a key complement to terrestrial networks by offering flexible access and global coverage. Despite the significant potential, NTNs still face critical challenges, including dynamic propagation environments, energy constraints, and dense interference. As a key 6G technology, Fluid Antennas (FAs) can reshape wireless channels by reconfiguring radiating elements within a limited space, such as their positions and rotations, to provide higher channel diversity and multiplexing gains. Compared to fixed-position antennas, FAs can present a promising integration path for NTNs to mitigate dynamic channel fading and optimize resource allocation. This paper provides a comprehensive review of FA-assisted NTNs. We begin with a brief overview of the classical structure and limitations of existing NTNs, the fundamentals and advantages of FAs, and the basic principles of FA-assisted NTNs. We then investigate the joint optimization solutions, detailing the adjustments of FA configurations, NTN platform motion modes, and resource allocations. We also discuss the combination with other emerging technologies and explore FA-assisted NTNs as a novel network architecture for intelligent function integrations. Furthermore, we delve into the physical layer security and covert communication in FA-assisted NTNs. Finally, we highlight the potential future directions to empower broader applications of FA-assisted NTNs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.00569 by Celimuge Wu, Jie Zhu, Kai-Kit Wong, Ming Jiang, Pei Peng, Qingqing Wu, Runke Fan, Tianheng Xu, Xianfu Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An potential FA-assisted NTN architecture. FAs integrated with different NTN platforms can provide global signal coverage and flexible resource [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Organization of this survey. PLS and how to utilize FAs for covert communication are discussed. • We outline future directions and new research opportuni￾ties in FA-assisted NTNs, including AI applications, high￾frequency communication, near-field communication, as well as Integrated Sensing, Communication, and Compu￾tation (ISCC). The organization of this survey is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Liquid-based FA. The antenna feeding mechanism gathers CSI from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Programmable Meta-FA in [50]. (a) A potential architecture of Meta￾FA. A 2-D plane deploys massive controllable basic units that contain a current-carrying slot and four PIN diodes. The FPGA controller can selectively activate the basic unit to adjust the amplitude and phase of the electromagnetic wave radiation. (b) Demo system of Meta-FA. between the (n1, n2)-th and (m1, m2)-th ports, which is given by: … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mechanically MA. (a) A potential architecture of MA. The digital [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The FA-assisted NTN channel model. environments. Then we provide a detailed review of AI-based CSI estimation methods. A. Channel Modeling of FA-Assisted NTNs An FA-assisted NTN structure can be modeled as a lay￾ered, functionally integrated system architecture consisting of three core subsystems. The terrestrial layer includes ter￾restrial base stations and edge nodes integrated with FAs, serving both aer… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The model architecture of (a) LSTM-based, (b) transformer-based, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Minimum achievable rates versus number of users in a multiuser [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Experimental results in [98]: (a) 3D UAV trajectory of the proposed algorithm; (b) The achievable data rate versus transmit power. faster convergence and higher sum rate than the fixed UAV trajectory and FPA scheme. In downlink data transmission, Liu et al. in [98] utilized an FA-assisted UAVs to maximize the sum rate. The FA positions, transmit beamforming, and the UAV trajectory are alternatively optimi… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Achievable network rates of f-FAMA against the number of UEs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Achievable network rates of s-FAMA against the number of UEs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: A potential RIS-FA-NTN system. In satellite networks, RIS-FA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: An FA-assisted NTNs integrated mobile edge computing systems. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: An FA-assisted NTNs integrated over-the-air FL systems. In the FA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: An FA-assisted NTNs integrated ISAC system. FA-assisted NTNs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_17.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

173 extracted references · 20 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A Survey on Space-Air- Ground-Sea Integrated Network Security in 6G,

    H. Guo, J. Li, J. Liu, N. Tian, and N. Kato, “A Survey on Space-Air- Ground-Sea Integrated Network Security in 6G,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 53–87, Firstquarter 2022

  2. [2]

    A Review on 6G for Space-Air-Ground Integrated Network: Key Enablers, Open Challenges, and Future Direction,

    P. P. Ray, “A Review on 6G for Space-Air-Ground Integrated Network: Key Enablers, Open Challenges, and Future Direction,”Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 6949–6976, Oct. 2022

  3. [3]

    Evolution of Non-Terrestrial Networks from 5G to 6G: A survey,

    M. M. Azari, S. Solanki, S. Chatzinotas, O. Kodheli, H. Sallouha, A. Colpaert, J. F. Mendoza Montoya, S. Pollin, A. Haqiqatnejad, A. Mostaani, E. Lagunas, and B. Ottersten, “Evolution of Non-Terrestrial Networks from 5G to 6G: A survey,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2633–2672, Fourthquarter 2022

  4. [4]

    Cellular, Aide-Area, and Nonterrestrial IoT: A Survey on 5G Advances and the Road Toward 6G,

    M. Vaezi, A. Azari, S. R. Khosravirad, M. Shirvanimoghaddam, M. M. Azari, D. Chasaki, and P. Popovski, “Cellular, Aide-Area, and Nonterrestrial IoT: A Survey on 5G Advances and the Road Toward 6G,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1117–1174, Secondquarter 2022

  5. [5]

    Inte- grating Terrestrial and Non-Terrestrial Networks: 3D Opportunities and Challenges,

    G. Geraci, D. L ´opez-P´erez, M. Benzaghta, and S. Chatzinotas, “Inte- grating Terrestrial and Non-Terrestrial Networks: 3D Opportunities and Challenges,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 42–48, Apr. 2023

  6. [6]

    Review of 5G NTN Standards Development and Technical Challenges for Satellite Integration With the 5G Network,

    M. Hosseinian, J. P. Choi, S. H. Chang, and J. Lee, “Review of 5G NTN Standards Development and Technical Challenges for Satellite Integration With the 5G Network,”IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 22–31, Aug. 2021

  7. [7]

    Toward 6G Non-Terrestrial Networks,

    G. Araniti, A. Iera, S. Pizzi, and F. Rinaldi, “Toward 6G Non-Terrestrial Networks,”IEEE Network, vol. 36, no. 1, pp.113–120, Nov. 2021

  8. [8]

    Large Language Models for UA Vs: Current State and Pathways to the Future,

    S. Javaid, H. Fahim, B. He, and N. Saeed, “Large Language Models for UA Vs: Current State and Pathways to the Future,”IEEE Open Journal of V ehicular Technology, vol. 5, pp. 1166–1192, Aug. 2024

  9. [9]

    Fluid Antenna Systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K. F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Fluid Antenna Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Mar. 2021

  10. [10]

    Historical Review of Fluid Antenna and Movable Antenna,

    L. Zhu and K. K. Wong, “Historical Review of Fluid Antenna and Movable Antenna,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02362v2, 2024

  11. [11]

    Fluid Antenna System: New Insights on Outage Probability and Diversity Gain,

    W. K. New, K. K. Wong, X. Hao, K. F. Tong, and C. B. Chae, “Fluid Antenna System: New Insights on Outage Probability and Diversity Gain,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 128–140, Jan. 2024

  12. [12]

    Fluid Antenna System for 6G: When Bruce Lee Inspires Wireless Communications,

    K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, Y . Zhang, and Z. Zheng, “Fluid Antenna System for 6G: When Bruce Lee Inspires Wireless Communications,” Electronics Letters, vol. 56, no. 24, pp. 1288–1290, Nov. 2020

  13. [13]

    Flexible-Position MIMO for Wireless Communications: Fundamentals, Challenges, and Future Directions,

    J. Zheng, J. Zhang, H. Du, D. Niyato, S. Sun, B. Ai, and K. B. Letaief, “Flexible-Position MIMO for Wireless Communications: Fundamentals, Challenges, and Future Directions,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 18–26, Oct. 2024

  14. [14]

    Fluid Antenna Systems Enabling 6G: Principles, Applications, and Research Directions,

    T. Wu, K. Zhi, J. Yao, X. Lai, J. Zheng, H. Niu, M. Elkashlan, K. K. Wong, C. B. Chae, Z. Ding, et al., “Fluid Antenna Systems Enabling 6G: Principles, Applications, and Research Directions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03839, 2024

  15. [15]

    MIMO Evolution Beyond 5G Through Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces and Fluid Antenna Systems,

    A. Shojaeifard, K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, Z. Chu, A. Mourad, A. Haghighat, I. Hemadeh, N. T. Nguyen, V . Tapio, and M. Juntti, “MIMO Evolution Beyond 5G Through Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces and Fluid Antenna Systems,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1244–1265, Sept. 2022

  16. [16]

    Fluid Antenna Multiple Access,

    K. K. Wong and K. F. Tong, “Fluid Antenna Multiple Access,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 4801– 4815, Jul. 2022

  17. [18]

    6-D Movable Antenna Enhanced Interference Mitigation for Cellular-Connected UA V Communications,

    T. Ren, X. Zhang, L. Zhu, W. Ma, X. Gao, and R. Zhang, “6-D Movable Antenna Enhanced Interference Mitigation for Cellular-Connected UA V Communications,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1618–1622, Jun. 2025

  18. [19]

    Bruce Lee Inspired Fluid Antenna System: Six Research Topics and the Potentials for 6G,

    K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, Y . Shen, Y . Chen, and Y . Zhang, “Bruce Lee Inspired Fluid Antenna System: Six Research Topics and the Potentials for 6G,”Frontiers in Communications and Networks, vol. 3, no. 853416, Mar. 2022

  19. [20]

    A Survey on Fluid Antenna Multiple Access for 6G: A New Multiple Access Technology That Provides Great Diversity in a Small Space,

    A. F. M. S. Shah, M. Ali Karabulut, E. Cinar, and K. M. Rabie, “A Survey on Fluid Antenna Multiple Access for 6G: A New Multiple Access Technology That Provides Great Diversity in a Small Space,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 88410–88425, Jun. 2024

  20. [21]

    AI-Empowered Fluid Antenna Systems: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions,

    C. Wang, Z. Li, K. K. Wong, R. Murch, C. B. Chae, and S. Jin, “AI-Empowered Fluid Antenna Systems: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 34–41, Oct. 2024

  21. [22]

    Integrated Sensing and Communication Meets Smart Propagation En- gineering: Opportunities and Challenges,

    K. Meng, C. Masouros, K. K. Wong, A. P. Petropulu, and L. Hanzo, “Integrated Sensing and Communication Meets Smart Propagation En- gineering: Opportunities and Challenges,”IEEE Network, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 278–285, Mar. 2025

  22. [23]

    A Tutorial on Fluid Antenna System for 6G Networks: Encom- passing Communication Theory, Optimization Methods and Hardware Designs,

    W. K. New, K. K. Wong, H. Xu, C. Wang, F. R. Ghadi, J. Zhang, J. Rao, R. Murch, P. Ramirez-Espinosa, D. Morales-Jimenez, C. B. Chae, and K. F. Tong, “A Tutorial on Fluid Antenna System for 6G Networks: Encom- passing Communication Theory, Optimization Methods and Hardware Designs,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2325–2377, Aug. 2025

  23. [24]

    A Tutorial on Movable Antennas for Wireless Networks,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, W. Mei, Y . Zeng, Q. Wu, B. Ning, Z. Xiao, X. Shao, J. Zhang, and R. Zhang, “A Tutorial on Movable Antennas for Wireless Networks,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, early access, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2025.3546373

  24. [25]

    A Tutorial on Six-Dimensional Movable Antenna for 6G Networks: Synergizing Positionable and Rotatable Antennas,

    X. Shao, W. Mei, C. You, Q. Wu, B. Zheng, C. X. Wang, J. Li, R. Zhang, R. Schober, L. Zhu, W. Zhuang, and X. Shen, “A Tutorial on Six-Dimensional Movable Antenna for 6G Networks: Synergizing Positionable and Rotatable Antennas,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, early access, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2025.3602939

  25. [26]

    Non-Terrestrial Networks in 5G & Beyond: A Survey,

    F. Rinaldi, H.-L. Maattanen, J. Torsner, S. Pizzi, S. Andreev, A. Iera, Y . Koucheryavy, and G. Araniti, “Non-Terrestrial Networks in 5G & Beyond: A Survey,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 165178–165200, Sept. 2020

  26. [27]

    Study on New Radio to Support Non- Terrestrial Networks,

    3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP); Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network, “Study on New Radio to Support Non- Terrestrial Networks,”Release 15, 3GPP TR 38.811 V15.4.0, Oct. 2020

  27. [28]

    Enhanced LTE support for aerial ve- hicles,

    3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP); Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network, “Enhanced LTE support for aerial ve- hicles,”Release 15, 3GPP TR 36.777 V15.0.0, Jan. 2018

  28. [29]

    Solutions for NR to support non- terrestrial networks,

    3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP); Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network, “Solutions for NR to support non- terrestrial networks,”Release 16, 3GPP TR 38.821 V16.2.0, Apr. 2023

  29. [30]

    A Survey of Air-to-Ground Propagation Channel Modeling for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles,

    W. Khawaja, I. Guvenc, D. W. Matolak, U. C. Fiebig, and N. Schnecken- burger, “A Survey of Air-to-Ground Propagation Channel Modeling for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 2361–2391, Thirdquarter 2019

  30. [31]

    A Survey of Channel Modeling for UA V Communications,

    A. A. Khuwaja, Y . Chen, N. Zhao, M. S. Alouini, and P. Dobbins, “A Survey of Channel Modeling for UA V Communications,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2804–2821, Fourthquarter 2018

  31. [32]

    UA V-Assisted Data Collection for Internet of Things: A Survey,

    Z. Wei, M. Zhu, N. Zhang, L. Wang, Y . Zou, Z. Meng, H. Wu, and Z. Feng, “UA V-Assisted Data Collection for Internet of Things: A Survey,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 17, pp. 15460–15483, Sept. 2022

  32. [33]

    UA V-Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication: Opportunities and Challenges,

    K. Meng, Q. Wu, J. Xu, W. Chen, Z. Feng, R. Schober, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “UA V-Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communication: Opportunities and Challenges,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 97–104, Apr. 2024

  33. [34]

    A Survey on the Convergence of Edge Computing and AI for UA Vs: Opportunities and Challenges,

    P. McEnroe, S. Wang, and M. Liyanage, “A Survey on the Convergence of Edge Computing and AI for UA Vs: Opportunities and Challenges,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 17, pp. 15435–15459, Sept. 2022. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, SEPTEMBER 2025 27

  34. [35]

    UA V-Enabled Wireless Power Transfer: A Tutorial Overview,

    L. Xie, X. Cao, J. Xu, and R. Zhang, “UA V-Enabled Wireless Power Transfer: A Tutorial Overview,”IEEE Transactions on Green Commu- nications and Networking, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 2042–2064, Dec. 2021

  35. [36]

    A Vision and Framework for the High Altitude Platform Station (HAPS) Networks of the Future,

    G. Karabulut Kurt, M. G. Khoshkholgh, S. Alfattani, A. Ibrahim, T. S. J. Darwish, M. S. Alam, H. Yanikomeroglu, and A. Yongacoglu, “A Vision and Framework for the High Altitude Platform Station (HAPS) Networks of the Future,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 729–779, Secondquarter 2021

  36. [37]

    Satellite Communica- tions in the New Space Era: A Survey and Future Challenges,

    O. Kodheli, E. Lagunas, N. Maturo, S. K. Sharma, B. Shankar, J. F. M. Montoya, J. C. M. Duncan, D. Spano, S. Chatzinotas, S. Kisseleff, J. Querol, L. Lei, T. X. Vu, and G. Goussetis, “Satellite Communica- tions in the New Space Era: A Survey and Future Challenges,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 23, pp. 70–109, Firstquarter 2021

  37. [38]

    Integrated Communications and Localization for Massive MIMO LEO Satellite Systems,

    L. You, X. Qiang, Y . Zhu, F. Jiang, C. G. Tsinos, W. Wang, H. Wymeersch, X. Gao, and B. Ottersten, “Integrated Communications and Localization for Massive MIMO LEO Satellite Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11061– 11075, Sept. 2024

  38. [39]

    Multiple-User Transmission in Space Information Networks: Architecture and Key Techniques,

    X. Zhang, L. Zhu, T. Li, Y . Xia, and W. Zhuang, “Multiple-User Transmission in Space Information Networks: Architecture and Key Techniques,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 17– 23, Apr. 2019

  39. [40]

    Nonterrestrial Commu- nications Assisted by Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces,

    J. Ye, J. Qiao, A. Kammoun, and M. S. Alouini, “Nonterrestrial Commu- nications Assisted by Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 110, no. 9, pp. 1423–1465, May 2022

  40. [41]

    Service Coordination in the Space-Air-Ground Integrated Network,

    Y . Guo, Q. Li, Y . Li, N. Zhang, and S. Wang, “Service Coordination in the Space-Air-Ground Integrated Network,”IEEE Network, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 168–173, Nov. 2021

  41. [42]

    HAP- Assisted Multi-Aerial Base Station Deployment for Capacity Enhance- ment via Federated Deep Reinforcement Learning,

    L. Liu H. He, F. Qi, Y . Zhao, W. Xie, F. Zhou, and L. Feng, “HAP- Assisted Multi-Aerial Base Station Deployment for Capacity Enhance- ment via Federated Deep Reinforcement Learning,”Journal of Cloud Computing, vol. 12, no. 1, Sept. 2023

  42. [43]

    HAPS in the Non- Terrestrial Network Nexus: Prospective Architectures and Performance Insights,

    Z. Lou, B. E. Y . Belmekki, and M. S. Alouini, “HAPS in the Non- Terrestrial Network Nexus: Prospective Architectures and Performance Insights,”IEEE Wireless Communications, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 52–58, Dec. 2023

  43. [44]

    Toward Liquid Reconfigurable Antenna Arrays for Wireless Communications,

    J. O. Mart ´ınez, J. R. Rodr ´ıguez, Y . Shen, K. F. Tong, K. K. Wong, and A. G. Armada, “Toward Liquid Reconfigurable Antenna Arrays for Wireless Communications,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 145–151, Dec. 2022

  44. [45]

    Closed-Form Expressions for Spatial Correlation Parameters for Performance Analysis of Fluid Antenna Systems,

    K. Wong, K. Tong, Y . Chen, and Y . Zhang, “Closed-Form Expressions for Spatial Correlation Parameters for Performance Analysis of Fluid Antenna Systems,”Electronics Letters, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 454–457, Apr. 2022

  45. [46]

    A New Spatial Block-Correlation Model for Fluid Antenna Systems,

    P. Ram ´ırez-Espinosa, D. Morales-Jimenez, and K. K. Wong, “A New Spatial Block-Correlation Model for Fluid Antenna Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 15829– 15843, Nov. 2024

  46. [47]

    A New Analytical Approximation of the Fluid Antenna System Channel,

    M. Khammassi, A. Kammoun, and M.-S. Alouini, “A New Analytical Approximation of the Fluid Antenna System Channel,”IEEE Transac- tions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 8843–8858, Dec. 2023

  47. [48]

    Design and Optimization of Multiport Pixel Antennas,

    S. Soltani, P. Lotfi, and R. D. Murch, “Design and Optimization of Multiport Pixel Antennas,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 2049–2054, Apr. 2018

  48. [49]

    Pixel Antenna Optimization Using N-Port Characteristic Mode Analysis,

    F. Jiang, C. Y . Chiu, S. Shen, Q. S. Cheng, and R. Murch, “Pixel Antenna Optimization Using N-Port Characteristic Mode Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 3336–3347, May 2020

  49. [50]

    Pro- grammable meta-fluid antenna for spatial multiplexing in fast fluctuating radio channels,

    B. Liu, K. F. Tong, K. K. Wong, C. B. Chae, and H. Wong, “Pro- grammable meta-fluid antenna for spatial multiplexing in fast fluctuating radio channels,”Optics Express, vol. 33, no. 13, pp. 28898–28915, 2025

  50. [52]

    Movable Antennas for Wireless Communication: Opportunities and Challenges,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable Antennas for Wireless Communication: Opportunities and Challenges,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 114–120, Jun. 2024

  51. [53]

    6D Movable Antenna Based on User Distribution: Modeling and Optimization,

    X. Shao, Q. Jiang, and R. Zhang, “6D Movable Antenna Based on User Distribution: Modeling and Optimization,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 355–370, Jan. 2025

  52. [54]

    Performance Limits of Fluid Antenna Systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K. F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Performance Limits of Fluid Antenna Systems,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2469–2472, Nov. 2020

  53. [55]

    Energy Efficiency Maximization Under Delay-Outage Probability Constraints Using Fluid Antenna Systems,

    Y . Xu, Y . Chen, Y . Hou, K. K. Wong, Q. Cui, and X. Tao, “Energy Efficiency Maximization Under Delay-Outage Probability Constraints Using Fluid Antenna Systems,” inProceeding of the 2023 IEEE Statis- tical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP), pp. 105–109, Hanoi, Vietnam, Jul. 2023

  54. [56]

    Fluid Antenna System Enhancing Orthogonal and Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access,

    W. K. New, K. K. Wong, H. Xu, K. F. Tong, C. B. Chae, and Y . Zhang, “Fluid Antenna System Enhancing Orthogonal and Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 218–222, Jan. 2024

  55. [57]

    MIMO Capacity Characterization for Movable Antenna Systems,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “MIMO Capacity Characterization for Movable Antenna Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communi- cations, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 3392–3407, Apr. 2024

  56. [58]

    Transmit and Receive Antenna Port Selection for Channel Capacity Maximization in Fluid-MIMO Systems,

    C. N. Efrem and I. Krikidis, “Transmit and Receive Antenna Port Selection for Channel Capacity Maximization in Fluid-MIMO Systems,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 3202-3206, Nov. 2024

  57. [59]

    6DMA Enhanced Wireless Network with Flexible Antenna Position and Rotation: Opportunities and Challenges,

    Shao X and Zhang R., “6DMA Enhanced Wireless Network with Flexible Antenna Position and Rotation: Opportunities and Challenges,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 121–128, Apr. 2025

  58. [60]

    Movable-Antenna Array Enhanced Beamforming: Achieving Full Array Gain with Null Steering,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma, and R. Zhang, “Movable-Antenna Array Enhanced Beamforming: Achieving Full Array Gain with Null Steering,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 3340–3344, Dec. 2023

  59. [61]

    Joint Beamforming and Antenna Movement Design for Moveable Antenna Systems Based on Statistical CSI,

    X. Chen, B. Feng, Y . Wu, D. W. Kwan Ng, and R. Schober, “Joint Beamforming and Antenna Movement Design for Moveable Antenna Systems Based on Statistical CSI,” inProceeding of the 2023 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM 2023), pp. 4387– 4392, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Dec. 2023

  60. [62]

    Dynamic Channel Modeling of Fluid Antenna Systems in UA V Com- munications,

    H. Jiang, W. Shi, Z. Chen, Z. Zhang, K. K. Wong, and H. Shin, “Dynamic Channel Modeling of Fluid Antenna Systems in UA V Com- munications,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 3169–3173, Oct. 2025

  61. [63]

    Fast Fluid Antenna Multiple Access Enabling Massive Connectivity,

    K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, Y . Chen, and Y . Zhang, “Fast Fluid Antenna Multiple Access Enabling Massive Connectivity,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 711–715, Feb. 2023

  62. [64]

    Port Selection for Fluid Antenna Systems,

    Z. Chai, K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, Y . Chen, and Y . Zhang, “Port Selection for Fluid Antenna Systems,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1180–1184, May 2022

  63. [65]

    Fast Port Selection Using Temporal and Spatial Correlation for Fluid Antenna Systems,

    S. Zhang, J. Mao, Y . Hou, Y . Chen, K. K. Wong, Q. Cui, and X. Tao, “Fast Port Selection Using Temporal and Spatial Correlation for Fluid Antenna Systems,” inProceeding of the 2023 IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP), pp. 95–99, Hanoi, Vietnam, Jul. 2023

  64. [66]

    Deep Learning Enabled Slow Fluid Antenna Multiple Access,

    N. Waqar, K. K. Wong, K. F. Tong, A. Sharples, and Y . Zhang, “Deep Learning Enabled Slow Fluid Antenna Multiple Access,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 861–865, Mar. 2023

  65. [67]

    Deep Learning-Based Channel Estimation for Beamspace mmWave Massive MIMO Systems,

    H. He, C. K. Wen, S. Jin, and G. Y . Li, “Deep Learning-Based Channel Estimation for Beamspace mmWave Massive MIMO Systems,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 852–855, Oct. 2018

  66. [68]

    cGAN-Based Slow Fluid Antenna Multiple Access,

    M. Eskandari, A. G. Burr, K. Cumanan, and K. K. Wong, “cGAN-Based Slow Fluid Antenna Multiple Access,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2907–2911, Oct. 2024

  67. [69]

    Virtual FAS by Learning-Based Imaginary Antennas,

    K. K. Wong, C. Wang, H. Zhang, G. Li, C. Wang, C. B. Chae, and R. Murch, “Virtual FAS by Learning-Based Imaginary Antennas,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1581–1585, Jun. 2024

  68. [70]

    Learning-Induced Channel Extrapolation for Fluid Antenna Systems Using Asymmetric Graph Masked Autoencoder,

    H. Zhang, J. Wang, C. Wang, C. Wang, K. K. Wong, B. Wang, and C. B. Chae, “Learning-Induced Channel Extrapolation for Fluid Antenna Systems Using Asymmetric Graph Masked Autoencoder,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1665–1669, Jun. 2024

  69. [71]

    Accurate and Fast Channel Estimation for Fluid Antenna Systems with Diffusion Models,

    E. Tang, W. Guo, H. He, S. Song, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “Accurate and Fast Channel Estimation for Fluid Antenna Systems with Diffusion Models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04930, 2025

  70. [72]

    Graph Neural Network Enabled Fluid Antenna Systems: A Two-Stage Ap- proach,

    C. He, Y . Lu, W. Chen, B. Ai, K. K. Wong, and D. Niyato, “Graph Neural Network Enabled Fluid Antenna Systems: A Two-Stage Ap- proach,”IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology, early access, doi: 10.1109/TVT.2025.3570319

  71. [73]

    Fluid Antenna with Linear MMSE Channel Estimation for Large-scale cellular networks,

    C. Skouroumounis and I. Krikidis, “Fluid Antenna with Linear MMSE Channel Estimation for Large-scale cellular networks,”IEEE Transac- tions on Communications, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 1112–1125, Feb. 2023

  72. [74]

    Channel Estimation for FAS-Assisted Multiuser mmWave Systems,

    H. Xu, G. Zhou, K. K. Wong, W. K. New, C. Wang, C. B. Chae, R. Murch, S. Jin, and Y . Zhang, “Channel Estimation for FAS-Assisted Multiuser mmWave Systems,”IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 632-636, Mar. 2024

  73. [75]

    Estimation of Channel Parameters for Port Selection in Millimeter-Wave Fluid Antenna Systems,

    R. Wang, Y . Chen, Y . Hou, K. K. Wong, and X. Tao, “Estimation of Channel Parameters for Port Selection in Millimeter-Wave Fluid Antenna Systems,” inProceeding of the 2023 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC Workshops), pp. 1–6, Dalian, China, 2023. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, SEPTEMBER 2025 28

  74. [76]

    Compressed Sensing Based Channel Estimation for Movable Antenna Communications,

    W. Ma, L. Zhu, and R. Zhang, “Compressed Sensing Based Channel Estimation for Movable Antenna Communications,”IEEE Communica- tions Letters, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2747–2751, Oct. 2023

  75. [77]

    Channel Estimation for Movable Antenna Communication Systems: A Framework Based on Compressed Sensing,

    Z. Xiao, S. Cao, L. Zhu, Y . Liu, B. Ning, X. Xia, and R. Zhang, “Channel Estimation for Movable Antenna Communication Systems: A Framework Based on Compressed Sensing,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 11814–11830, Sept. 2024

  76. [78]

    Successive Bayesian Reconstructor for Channel Estimation in Fluid Antenna Systems,

    Z. Zhang, J. Zhu, L. Dai, and R. W. Heath, “Successive Bayesian Reconstructor for Channel Estimation in Fluid Antenna Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1992– 2006, Mar. 2025

  77. [79]

    Transforming Time- Varying to Static Channels: The Power of Fluid Antenna Mobility,

    W. Li, H. Yin, F. Fu, Y . Cao, and M. Debbah, “Transforming Time- Varying to Static Channels: The Power of Fluid Antenna Mobility,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 4767– 4780, Jun. 2025

  78. [80]

    Channel Estimation and Reconstruction in Fluid Antenna System: Oversampling is Essential,

    W. K. New, K. K. Wong, H. Xu, F. Rostami Ghadi, R. Murch, and C. B. Chae, “Channel Estimation and Reconstruction in Fluid Antenna System: Oversampling is Essential,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 309–322, Jan. 2025

  79. [81]

    Transformer based Collaborative Reinforcement Learning for Fluid Antenna System (FAS)-enabled 3D UA V Positioning,

    X. Xu, H. Xu, D. Wei, W. Saad, M. Bennis, and M. Chen, “Transformer based Collaborative Reinforcement Learning for Fluid Antenna System (FAS)-enabled 3D UA V Positioning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.09094, 2025

  80. [82]

    Capacity Maximization of Uplink with Fluid Antenna System at Both Ends,

    B. Tang, H. Xu, K. K. Wong, L. You, W. K. New, and C. B. Chae, “Capacity Maximization of Uplink with Fluid Antenna System at Both Ends,”IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, early access, doi: 10.1109/TWC.2025.3580506

Showing first 80 references.