pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.01279 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-03 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Super-resolved reconstruction of single-photon emitter locations from g⁽²⁾(0) maps

Sonali Gupta , Amit Kumar , Vikas S Bhat , Sushil Mujumdar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 01:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords single-photon sourcesNV centersg(2)(0)photon antibunchingsuper-resolutionconfocal microscopyquantum photonics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Raster-scanned g(2)(0) mapping inverts local antibunching to recover single-photon emitter counts and positions on a sub-focal-spot grid.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that scanning the second-order correlation function g(2)(0) at each point in a confocal image and then inverting those values yields the effective number of emitters inside every focal spot. This inversion produces an occupancy map whose spatial resolution is finer than the diffraction-limited spot size. The approach replaces slow, high-resolution intensity scans with a faster correlation-based measurement while still distinguishing isolated NV centers from clusters. A sympathetic reader would care because reliable identification of single emitters is a bottleneck for building room-temperature quantum photonic devices. The method therefore offers a practical route to higher-throughput characterization of nanophotonic structures that host these emitters.

Core claim

By measuring local photon antibunching across the field of view, the technique extracts the effective emitter number within each focal spot and reconstructs occupancy maps on a sub-focal-spot grid. This enables recovery of the number and spatial distribution of emitters within regions smaller than the confocal focal spot.

What carries the argument

Inversion of raster-scanned g(2)(0) values using a known point-spread function and an additive model of emitter contributions to the correlation function.

If this is right

  • Emitter distributions can be mapped inside a single diffraction-limited spot without exhaustive intensity scanning.
  • The method supplies faster feedback during fabrication of nanophotonic devices that integrate NV centers.
  • It distinguishes isolated single-photon sources from small clusters on a practical time scale.
  • Simulations show robust recovery of NV-center distributions under the stated model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same inversion principle might be applied to other single-photon sources whose antibunching is measurable in a confocal setup.
  • Combining the g(2)(0) map with polarization or spectral data could further constrain the reconstruction.
  • The approach could be extended to time-resolved correlation measurements to extract additional emitter properties.

Load-bearing premise

The measured g(2)(0) values can be uniquely inverted to recover emitter occupancy, assuming a stable point-spread function and that multiple emitters add to the correlation function without significant cross-talk or background.

What would settle it

Place two NV centers a known distance apart that is smaller than the focal spot and check whether the reconstructed occupancy map shows two distinct peaks at the correct locations and separation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.01279 by Amit Kumar, Sonali Gupta, Sushil Mujumdar, Vikas S Bhat.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Simulated results. (a) g (2)(τ ) for a single NV center in diamond, showing antibunching with g (2)(0) = 0.07. Inset: g (2)(0) versus the corre￾lation bin width ∆t; the vertical green dashed line marks the ∆t used in simulations. (b) g (2)(0) as a function of the number of emitters N: theory g (2)(0) = 1 − 1 N (blue) and simulations (orange). Having established with Fig 1a that the simulator reproduces the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) shows Spatial distribution of NV centers over a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) shows reconstructed NV-center distribution obtained by using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Original NV-center distribution over a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of conventional intensity mapping and reconstruction. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Single-photon sources are vital for emerging quantum technologies. In particular, Nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond are promising due to their room-temperature stability, long spin coherence, and compatibility with nanophotonic structures. A key challenge, however, is the reliable identification of isolated NV centers, since conventional confocal microscopy is diffraction-limited and cannot resolve emitter distributions within a focal spot. Besides, the associated intensity scanning is a time-expensive procedure. Here, we introduce a raster-scanned $g^{(2)}(0)$ mapping technique combined with an inversion-based reconstruction algorithm. By directly measuring local photon antibunching across the field of view, we extract the effective emitter number within each focal spot and reconstruct occupancy maps on a sub-focal-spot grid. This enables recovery of the number and spatial distribution of emitters within regions smaller than the confocal focal spot, thereby offering possibilities of going beyond the diffraction limit. Our simulations confirm robust reconstruction of NV-center distributions. The method provides a practical diagnostic tool for locating single-photon sources in an efficient and accurate manner, at much lesser time and effort compared to conventional intensity scanning. It offers valuable feedback for nanophotonic device fabrication, supporting more precise and scalable integration of NV-based quantum photonic technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a raster-scanned g^{(2)}(0) mapping technique combined with an inversion algorithm to reconstruct the number and spatial distribution of single-photon emitters (e.g., NV centers) on a sub-focal-spot grid. By measuring local antibunching, the method extracts effective emitter counts within each confocal spot and claims super-resolved recovery of emitter locations and occupancies, supported by simulations showing robust reconstruction under ideal conditions. This is positioned as a faster alternative to conventional intensity scanning for quantum photonic applications.

Significance. If the inversion proves unique and stable, the approach could provide a practical, time-efficient diagnostic for locating isolated single-photon sources beyond the diffraction limit, aiding nanophotonic device fabrication and scalable integration of NV-based quantum technologies. The direct use of measured antibunching rather than fitted parameters is a conceptual strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that simulations confirm robust reconstruction of NV-center distributions, yet provides no details on the inversion algorithm, noise model, or quantitative validation metrics (e.g., reconstruction error, success rate under varying conditions). This omission leaves the central super-resolution claim without verifiable support in the manuscript.
  2. [Reconstruction method (inversion formula)] The reconstruction inverts local g^{(2)}(0) values using the relation g^{(2)}(0) = 1 - Σ r_i² / (Σ r_i)² with r_i = brightness × PSF(scan_pos - emitter_pos) to recover finer-grid occupancy. This requires exact PSF knowledge, zero background, identical emitter brightnesses, and no cross-talk or blinking; the manuscript does not demonstrate uniqueness or robustness when these assumptions are relaxed, which is load-bearing for the claimed sub-focal-spot recovery.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the point-spread function and brightness terms could be defined more explicitly at first use to improve readability for readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and limitations of our proposed method. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract states that simulations confirm robust reconstruction of NV-center distributions, yet provides no details on the inversion algorithm, noise model, or quantitative validation metrics (e.g., reconstruction error, success rate under varying conditions). This omission leaves the central super-resolution claim without verifiable support in the manuscript.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract is concise and does not detail the inversion algorithm or validation metrics. To better support the claims, we have revised the abstract to include a brief reference to the g^{(2)}(0)-based inversion and to note that quantitative reconstruction errors and success rates under the simulated conditions are provided in the main text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Reconstruction method (inversion formula)] The reconstruction inverts local g^{(2)}(0) values using the relation g^{(2)}(0) = 1 - Σ r_i² / (Σ r_i)² with r_i = brightness × PSF(scan_pos - emitter_pos) to recover finer-grid occupancy. This requires exact PSF knowledge, zero background, identical emitter brightnesses, and no cross-talk or blinking; the manuscript does not demonstrate uniqueness or robustness when these assumptions are relaxed, which is load-bearing for the claimed sub-focal-spot recovery.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies the idealizing assumptions (known PSF, uniform brightness, zero background, no blinking) under which the inversion formula is derived and under which our simulations show successful reconstruction. The manuscript presents this as a proof-of-principle demonstration rather than a fully general solution. We have added a dedicated paragraph in the discussion section that explicitly states these assumptions, notes that mathematical uniqueness is guaranteed only under the stated conditions, and outlines how the approach may be extended to cases with noise or emitter variability. Full robustness tests under all relaxed conditions remain outside the present scope but are identified as important future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: reconstruction is an independent inversion of measured data under stated physical model

full rationale

The paper's central derivation introduces raster-scanned g^{(2)}(0) mapping followed by an inversion algorithm that recovers sub-focal-spot occupancy from the measured correlation values. The forward model expresses g^{(2)}(0) in terms of emitter brightnesses and the confocal PSF at known scan positions; the reconstruction solves the resulting inverse problem for emitter positions and numbers on a finer grid. This step does not reduce to a self-definition, a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation. The method is presented as a direct physical measurement plus computational inversion, with simulations performed under the model's ideal assumptions serving as validation rather than tautological re-derivation. No uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from prior author work in a circular manner. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against the external physical inputs of photon statistics and the point-spread function.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The reconstruction depends on standard assumptions from confocal microscopy and quantum optics about the point-spread function and the relationship between emitter number and measured antibunching; no new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The confocal point-spread function is known and stable enough to be used in the inversion model.
    Implicit requirement for any sub-diffraction reconstruction from scanned correlation data.
  • domain assumption Multiple emitters within one focal spot contribute to g(2)(0) in a manner that permits unique inversion to occupancy.
    Central modeling choice that allows the mapping from correlation values to emitter counts.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5759 in / 1456 out tokens · 54283 ms · 2026-05-18T01:31:50.205621+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fault- tolerant quantum communication based on solid-state photon emitters,

    L. Childress, J. M. Taylor, A. S. Sørensen, and M. D. Lukin, “Fault- tolerant quantum communication based on solid-state photon emitters,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 96, p. 070504, Feb 2006

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    Processing quantum information in di- amond,

    J. Wrachtrup and F. Jelezko, “Processing quantum information in di- amond,”Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 18, p. S807, may 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Sub-rayleigh quantum imaging using single-photon sources,

    C. Thiel, T. Bastin, J. von Zanthier, and G. S. Agarwal, “Sub-rayleigh quantum imaging using single-photon sources,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 80, p. 013820, Jul 2009

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    A versatile source of single photons for quantum information processing,

    M. Förtsch, J. U. Fürst, C. Wittmann, D. Strekalov, A. Aiello, M. V. Chekhova, C. Silberhorn, G. Leuchs, and C. Marquardt, “A versatile source of single photons for quantum information processing,”Nature Communications, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1818, 2013

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Nanoscale imaging magnetometry with diamond spins under ambient conditions,

    G. Balasubramanian, I. Y. Chan, R. Kolesov, M. Al-Hmoud, J. Tisler, C. Shin, C. Kim, A. Wojcik, P. R. Hemmer, A. Krueger, T. Hanke, A. Leitenstorfer, R. Bratschitsch, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, “Nanoscale imaging magnetometry with diamond spins under ambient conditions,”Nature, vol. 455, no. 7213, pp. 648–651, 2008

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Nonclassical radiation of a single stored ion,

    F. Diedrich and H. Walther, “Nonclassical radiation of a single stored ion,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 58, pp. 203–206, Jan 1987

    work page 1987

  7. [7]

    Controlled single- photon emission from a single trapped two-level atom,

    B. Darquié, M. P. A. Jones, J. Dingjan, J. Beugnon, S. Bergamini, Y. Sortais, G. Messin, A. Browaeys, and P. Grangier, “Controlled single- photon emission from a single trapped two-level atom,”Science, vol. 309, no. 5733, pp. 454–456, 2005

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    Photon antibunch- ing in the fluorescence of a single dye molecule trapped in a solid,

    T. Basché, W. E. Moerner, M. Orrit, and H. Talon, “Photon antibunch- ing in the fluorescence of a single dye molecule trapped in a solid,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 69, pp. 1516–1519, Sep 1992

    work page 1992

  9. [9]

    A quantum dot single-photon turn- stile device,

    P. Michler, A. Kiraz, C. Becher, W. V. Schoenfeld, P. M. Petroff, L. Zhang, E. Hu, and A. Imamoglu, “A quantum dot single-photon turn- stile device,”Science, vol. 290, no. 5500, pp. 2282–2285, 2000. 13

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    Scal- able integrated single-photon source,

    R. Uppu, F. T. Pedersen, Y. Wang, C. T. Olesen, C. Papon, X. Zhou, L. Midolo, S. Scholz, A. D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, and P. Lodahl, “Scal- able integrated single-photon source,”Science Advances, vol. 6, no. 50, p. eabc8268, 2020

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers,

    T.T.Tran, K.Bray, M.J.Ford, M.Toth, andI.Aharonovich, “Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers,”Nature Nanotech- nology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 37–41, 2016

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Single- photon emission from silicon-vacancy color centers in polycrystalline di- amond membranes,

    A. M. Flatae, F. Sledz, H. Kambalathmana, S. Lagomarsino, H. Wang, N.Gelli, S.Sciortino, E.Wörner, C.Wild, B.Butz, andM.Agio, “Single- photon emission from silicon-vacancy color centers in polycrystalline di- amond membranes,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 124, no. 9, p. 094001, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Photon-emission statistics for single nitrogen-vacancy centers,

    I. Panadero, H. Espinós, L. Tsunaki, K. Volkova, A. Tobalina, J. Casanova, P. Acedo, B. Naydenov, R. Puebla, and E. Torrontegui, “Photon-emission statistics for single nitrogen-vacancy centers,”Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 22, p. 014035, Jul 2024

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Room temperature stable single-photon source,

    A. Beveratos, S. Kühn, R. Brouri, T. Gacoin, J.-P. Poizat, and P. Grang- ier, “Room temperature stable single-photon source,”The European Physical Journal D - Atomic, Molecular, Optical and Plasma Physics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 191–196, 2002

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    All-optical control of a solid-state spin using coherent dark states,

    C. G. Yale, B. B. Buckley, D. J. Christle, G. Burkard, F. J. Heremans, L. C. Bassett, and D. D. Awschalom, “All-optical control of a solid-state spin using coherent dark states,”Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, no. 19, pp. 7595–7600, 2013

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Robust all-optical single-shot readout of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond,

    D. M. Irber, F. Poggiali, F. Kong, M. Kieschnick, T. Lühmann, D. Kwiatkowski, J. Meijer, J. Du, F. Shi, and F. Reinhard, “Robust all-optical single-shot readout of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 532, 2021

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond,

    G. Balasubramanian, P. Neumann, D. Twitchen, M. Markham, R. Kolesov, N. Mizuochi, J. Isoya, J. Achard, J. Beck, J. Tissler, V. Jacques, P. R. Hemmer, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, “Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond,”Nature Mate- rials, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 383–387, 2009. 14

    work page 2009

  18. [18]

    Solid-state electronic spin coherence time approaching one second,

    N. Bar-Gill, L. M. Pham, A. Jarmola, D. Budker, and R. L. Walsworth, “Solid-state electronic spin coherence time approaching one second,”Na- ture Communications, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1743, 2013

    work page 2013

  19. [19]

    Magnetic sensing at zero field with a single nitrogen-vacancy cen- ter,

    T. Lenz, A. Wickenbrock, F. Jelezko, G. Balasubramanian, and D. Bud- ker, “Magnetic sensing at zero field with a single nitrogen-vacancy cen- ter,”Quantum Science and Technology, vol. 6, p. 034006, jun 2021

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Magnetic-field-assisted spectral decomposition and imaging of charge states ofN-vcenters in diamond,

    T. Chakraborty, R. Bhattacharya, V. Anjusha, M. Nesladek, D. Suter, and T. Mahesh, “Magnetic-field-assisted spectral decomposition and imaging of charge states ofN-vcenters in diamond,”Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 17, p. 024046, Feb 2022

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Coupling of nitrogen-vacancy centers to photonic crystal cavities in monocrystalline diamond,

    A. Faraon, C. Santori, Z. Huang, V. M. Acosta, and R. G. Beausoleil, “Coupling of nitrogen-vacancy centers to photonic crystal cavities in monocrystalline diamond,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 109, p. 033604, Jul 2012

    work page 2012

  22. [23]

    Coupling of nitrogen- vacancy centers in diamond to a gap waveguide,

    K.-M. C. Fu, C. Santori, P. E. Barclay, I. Aharonovich, S. Prawer, N. Meyer, A. M. Holm, and R. G. Beausoleil, “Coupling of nitrogen- vacancy centers in diamond to a gap waveguide,”Applied Physics Let- ters, vol. 93, p. 234107, 12 2008

    work page 2008

  23. [24]

    Controlled cou- pling of a single nitrogen-vacancy center to a silver nanowire,

    A. Huck, S. Kumar, A. Shakoor, and U. L. Andersen, “Controlled cou- pling of a single nitrogen-vacancy center to a silver nanowire,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 106, p. 096801, Feb 2011

    work page 2011

  24. [25]

    Scanning confocal optical microscopy and mag- netic resonance on single defect centers,

    A. Gruber, A. Dräbenstedt, C. Tietz, L. Fleury, J. Wrachtrup, and C. von Borczyskowski, “Scanning confocal optical microscopy and mag- netic resonance on single defect centers,”Science, vol. 276, no. 5321, pp. 2012–2014, 1997

    work page 2012

  25. [26]

    Single nitrogen vacancy centers in chemical vapor deposited diamond nanocrystals,

    J. R. Rabeau, A. Stacey, A. Rabeau, S. Prawer, F. Jelezko, I. Mirza, and J. Wrachtrup, “Single nitrogen vacancy centers in chemical vapor deposited diamond nanocrystals,”Nano Letters, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 3433– 3437, 2007. PMID: 17902725. 15

    work page 2007

  26. [27]

    Stable solid-state source of single photons,

    C. Kurtsiefer, S. Mayer, P. Zarda, and H. Weinfurter, “Stable solid-state source of single photons,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 85, pp. 290–293, Jul 2000

    work page 2000

  27. [28]

    Coupling of individual quan- tum emitters to channel plasmons,

    E. Bermúdez-Ureña, C. Gonzalez-Ballestero, M. Geiselmann, R. Marty, I. P. Radko, T. Holmgaard, Y. Alaverdyan, E. Moreno, F. J. García- Vidal, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, and R. Quidant, “Coupling of individual quan- tum emitters to channel plasmons,”Nature Communications, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 7883, 2015

    work page 2015

  28. [29]

    Integrated waveguides and deterministically positioned nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond created by femtosecond laser writing,

    J. P. Hadden, V. Bharadwaj, B. Sotillo, S. Rampini, R. Osellame, J. D. Witmer, H. Jayakumar, T. T. Fernandez, A. Chiappini, C. Armellini, M. Ferrari, R. Ramponi, P. E. Barclay, and S. M. Eaton, “Integrated waveguides and deterministically positioned nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond created by femtosecond laser writing,”Opt. Lett., vol. 43, pp. 3586–358...

    work page 2018

  29. [30]

    Hybrid nanocavity resonant enhancement of color center emission in diamond,

    P. E. Barclay, K.-M. C. Fu, C. Santori, A. Faraon, and R. G. Beausoleil, “Hybrid nanocavity resonant enhancement of color center emission in diamond,”Phys. Rev. X, vol. 1, p. 011007, Sep 2011

    work page 2011

  30. [31]

    Deterministic coupling of a single nitrogen vacancy center to a photonic crystal cavity,

    D. Englund, B. Shields, K. Rivoire, F. Hatami, J. Vučković, H. Park, and M. D. Lukin, “Deterministic coupling of a single nitrogen vacancy center to a photonic crystal cavity,”Nano Letters, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 3922– 3926, 2010

    work page 2010

  31. [32]

    Highly tunable formation of nitrogen-vacancy centers via ion implantation,

    S. Sangtawesin, T. O. Brundage, Z. J. Atkins, and J. R. Petta, “Highly tunable formation of nitrogen-vacancy centers via ion implantation,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 105, p. 063107, 08 2014

    work page 2014

  32. [33]

    Coherence measures for heralded single-photon sources,

    E. Bocquillon, C. Couteau, M. Razavi, R. Laflamme, and G. Weihs, “Coherence measures for heralded single-photon sources,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 79, p. 035801, Mar 2009

    work page 2009

  33. [34]

    Non- classical radiation from diamond nanocrystals,

    A. Beveratos, R. Brouri, T. Gacoin, J.-P. Poizat, and P. Grangier, “Non- classical radiation from diamond nanocrystals,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 64, p. 061802, Nov 2001

    work page 2001

  34. [35]

    Resonantenhancementofthezero-phononemissionfromacolourcentre in a diamond cavity,

    A. Faraon, P. E. Barclay, C. Santori, K.-M. C. Fu, and R. G. Beausoleil, “Resonantenhancementofthezero-phononemissionfromacolourcentre in a diamond cavity,”Nature Photonics, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 301–305, 2011. 16

    work page 2011

  35. [36]

    Purcell-enhanced single-photon emission from nitrogen-vacancy centers coupled to a tunable microcavity,

    H. Kaupp, T. Hümmer, M. Mader, B. Schlederer, J. Benedikter, P. Haeusser, H.-C. Chang, H. Fedder, T. W. Hänsch, and D. Hunger, “Purcell-enhanced single-photon emission from nitrogen-vacancy centers coupled to a tunable microcavity,”Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 6, p. 054010, Nov 2016. 17

    work page 2016