pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.03513 · v1 · pith:SJYDERULnew · submitted 2025-11-05 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

Group 13 Metals as L-Type Ligands for Transition Metals

Hellen Videa , M. Angeles Fuentes , Antonio J. Martinez-Martinez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 20:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords Group 13 ligandsL-type ligandsmetalloligandsaluminylenegallyleneindyleneheterometallic complexessigma donation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Low-valent Group 13 fragments serve as neutral two-electron L-type ligands to transition metals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review establishes that low-valent aluminum, gallium, and indium fragments can act as neutral two-electron donors when bound to transition metal centers. These metalloligands create heterometallic complexes whose bonding and reactivity differ from those supported by carbon monoxide, phosphines, or carbenes. The authors map out synthetic routes to these donors and analyze their electron donation and acceptance properties to derive periodic trends in donor ability. They also address cases where the ligand classification becomes ambiguous. Such a framework supports the design of new systems for activating small molecules through cooperation between the two metals.

Core claim

Low-valent Group 13 fragments can serve as neutral two-electron L-type metalloligands to transition-metal centers, enabling heterometallic M-TM platforms with bonding and reactivity patterns distinct from classical CO, phosphine, and carbene ligation. This work develops a unifying, descriptor-based view of aluminylene Al(I), gallylene Ga(I), and indylene In(I) donors, and contrasts them with the limited L-type behavior of Tl(I). Synthetic gateways are mapped, sigma-donation and pi-acceptance profiles are analyzed, and periodic design rules are extracted in which sigma-donor strength decreases Al > Ga > In.

What carries the argument

Descriptor-based view of sigma-donation and pi-acceptance profiles for aluminylenes, gallylenes, and indylenes that yields periodic design rules.

If this is right

  • Heterometallic M-TM platforms become accessible for small-molecule activation and cooperative catalysis.
  • Sigma-donor strength order Al > Ga > In guides selection of the Group 13 fragment for targeted electronics.
  • Ambiphilicity at the M(I) center enables distinct bonding modes compared with classical ligands.
  • Borderline L/X/Z classifications are clarified to ensure consistent descriptor use across the series.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The periodic rules may extend to other low-valent main-group metalloligands if comparable data series are assembled.
  • Applications in catalysis could exploit the ambiphilic character for substrate activation steps not available with organic donors.
  • Direct experimental benchmarks in a single TM fragment series would test the robustness of the donor-strength trend.

Load-bearing premise

Literature data on synthetic gateways and sigma/pi profiles from different transition-metal fragments can be compared directly without major confounding effects from sterics or specific metal choices.

What would settle it

A controlled series of isostructural complexes showing donor strength increasing from Al to In, or an isolable neutral L-type Tl(I) to TM coordination complex.

read the original abstract

Low-valent Group 13 fragments can serve as neutral two-electron L-type metalloligands to transition-metal (TM) centers, enabling heterometallic M-TM platforms with bonding and reactivity patterns distinct from classical CO, phosphine, and carbene ligation. This chapter develops a unifying, descriptor-based view of aluminylene Al(I), gallylene Ga(I), and indylene In(I) donors, and contrasts them with the limited L-type behavior of Tl(I). We map synthetic gateways to isolable M(I) donors, analyze their sigma-donation/pi-acceptance profiles, and extract periodic design rules in which the sigma-donor strength decreases Al > Ga > In, whereas Tl(I) has not yet been convincingly shown to engage in neutral L-type Tl->TM coordination. Borderline cases that blur L-, X-, and Z-type classifications are also examined to clarify descriptors and guide consistent usage across the series. This contribution links ligand sterics/electronics, ambiphilicity at M(I), and the chosen TM fragment to guide the rational design of M-TM platforms that harness Group-13 M(I) donors for small-molecule activation and cooperative catalysis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews low-valent Group 13 fragments (Al(I), Ga(I), In(I)) as neutral two-electron L-type metalloligands to transition-metal centers. It develops a unifying descriptor-based view of their synthetic access, sigma-donation/pi-acceptance profiles, and periodic trends, extracts design rules with sigma-donor strength decreasing Al > Ga > In, contrasts limited L-type behavior for Tl(I), and examines borderline L/X/Z classifications to guide heterometallic M-TM platforms for small-molecule activation and cooperative catalysis.

Significance. If the cross-literature comparisons and extracted trends hold after addressing potential confounders, the work would provide a useful framework for rational design of ambiphilic Group 13 metalloligands in heterometallic complexes. The synthesis of electronic profiles and synthetic gateways offers a consolidated perspective that could accelerate exploration of reactivity distinct from classical ligands such as CO or phosphines.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and periodic design rules] Abstract, paragraph on periodic design rules: The claim that sigma-donor strength decreases Al > Ga > In rests on direct comparison of literature data from non-identical TM fragments (e.g., Ni, Fe, Rh complexes with varying coordination numbers and steric profiles). Without a uniform computational re-analysis on a common TM fragment or explicit discussion of confounding effects from metal-specific back-donation or sterics, the intrinsic ordering cannot be isolated from experimental variables, weakening support for the central design rule.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The summary is concise but would benefit from indicating the approximate number of key complexes or literature sources synthesized to convey the breadth of the review.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive overall assessment of our manuscript. We address the major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and periodic design rules] Abstract, paragraph on periodic design rules: The claim that sigma-donor strength decreases Al > Ga > In rests on direct comparison of literature data from non-identical TM fragments (e.g., Ni, Fe, Rh complexes with varying coordination numbers and steric profiles). Without a uniform computational re-analysis on a common TM fragment or explicit discussion of confounding effects from metal-specific back-donation or sterics, the intrinsic ordering cannot be isolated from experimental variables, weakening support for the central design rule.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's concern regarding the basis for the proposed periodic trend in sigma-donor strength. The ordering Al > Ga > In is derived from a comprehensive survey of reported M(I)-TM complexes in the literature, where we have prioritized examples with similar TM fragments and coordination environments to minimize variables. Nevertheless, we agree that confounding factors such as differences in steric profiles and back-donation capabilities of the TM centers could influence the observed trends. In the revised version, we will add a dedicated paragraph in the main text discussing these potential confounders and will qualify the design rule in the abstract to reflect that it is based on available experimental and computational data from diverse systems rather than a single uniform benchmark. We believe this will strengthen the presentation without requiring new computations, which are beyond the scope of this review. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: review synthesizes independent external literature sources

full rationale

This is a review paper that maps synthetic gateways to isolable M(I) donors, analyzes sigma-donation/pi-acceptance profiles, and extracts periodic design rules by cross-referencing multiple independent literature sources on Al(I), Ga(I), In(I), and Tl(I) complexes with various transition-metal fragments. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-defined quantity, fitted parameter, or self-citation chain; the unifying descriptor-based view and design rules (e.g., sigma-donor strength Al > Ga > In) are presented as summaries of published data rather than novel derivations or predictions internal to the paper. The work remains self-contained against external benchmarks because its claims rest on verifiable synthetic methods and spectroscopic/computational profiles from prior independent studies.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review paper that draws on established organometallic ligand-classification frameworks and literature data without introducing new free parameters, axioms beyond domain standards, or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard organometallic descriptors for L-type, X-type, and Z-type ligand behavior remain consistent when applied to low-valent Group 13 metalloligands
    Invoked when mapping sigma-donation/pi-acceptance profiles and borderline cases in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5740 in / 1342 out tokens · 46467 ms · 2026-05-21T20:13:42.659221+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 135 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Such collisions are critical for industrial applications that can demand reliability levels as high as 10 -9 S1 S2 S3 S4 SNF

    The highly detailed studies on Ga(I) and Al(I) analogs set the stage, but In(I)’s unique properties (softer Lewis base, larger radius, accessible vacant orbitals) give rise to distinctly indium -centric outcomes, including higher cluster nuclearities and insertion processes, all while still functioning as an L -type ligand in the formal sense. These inves...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033

  2. [2]

    a) M. L. H. Green, G. Parkin, J. Chem. Educ. 2014, 91, 807-816; b) J. C. Green, M. L. H. Green, G. Parkin, Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 11481-11503; c) G. Parkin, in Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry III (Eds.: D. M. P. Mingos, R. H. Crabtree), Elsevier, Oxford, 2007, pp. 1-57; d) M. L. H. Green, in Studies in Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 19 (Eds.: E. R. Bra...

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    R. Y. Kong, M. R. Crimmin, Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 7810-7817

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    a) T. N. Hooper, M. Garçon, A. J. P. White, M. R. Crimmin, Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 5435- 5440; b) T. N. Hooper, R. K. Brown, F. Rekhroukh, M. Garçon, A. J. P. White, P. J. Costa, M. R. Crimmin, Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 7850-7857; c) F. Rekhroukh, W. Chen, R. K. Brown, A. J. P. White, M. R. Crimmin, Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 7842-7849

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Fujii, K

    a) I. Fujii, K. Semba, Q. -Z. Li, S. Sakaki, Y. Nakao, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 11647-11652; b) S. Morisako, S. Watanabe, S. Ikemoto, S. Muratsugu, M. Tada, M. Yamashita, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 15031-15035

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Weiss, D

    a) J. Weiss, D. Stetzkamp, B. Nuber, R. A. Fischer, C. Boehme, G. Frenking, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 70-72; b) T. Steinke, M. Cokoja, C. Gemel, A. Kempter, A. Krapp, G. Frenking, U. Zenneck, R. A. Fischer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2943-2946; c) Q. Yu, A. Purath, A. Donchev, H. Schnöckel, J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 584, 94-97; d) T. Steinke, C...

    work page 1997

  7. [7]

    Nagata, T

    a) K. Nagata, T. Agou, N. Tokitoh, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 3881-3884; b) D. J. Liptrot, P. P. Power, Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017, 1, 0004

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Nimmermark, L

    A. Nimmermark, L. Öhrström, J. Reedijk, Z. Kristallogr. Cryst. Mater. 2013, 228, 311- 317

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Tokitoh, R

    a) N. Tokitoh, R. Okazaki, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 210, 251-277; b) T. Cadenbach, C. Gemel, R. Schmid, R. A. Fischer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17068-17078

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    Campos, Nat

    a) J. Campos, Nat. Rev. Chem. 2020, 4, 696-702; b) M. H. Pérez -Temprano, J. A. Casares, A. R. de Lera, R. Alvarez, P. Espinet, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 97 4917-4920; c) R. J. Oeschger, P. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1069-1072; d) C. Chen, C. Hou, Y. Wang, T. S. A. Hor, Z. Weng, Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 524-527; e) O. Kysliak, H. Görls, R. Krets...

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Gemel, T

    a) C. Gemel, T. Steinke, M. Cokoja, A. Kempter, R. A. Fischer, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 2004, 4161 -4176; b) P. W. Roesky, Dalton Trans. 2009, 1887 -1893; c) S. González-Gallardo, T. Bollermann, R. A. Fischer, R. Murugavel, Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 3136-3170; d) M. Asay, C. Jones, M. Driess, Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 354-396; e) D. Vidovic, S. Aldridge, Chem. ...

    work page 2004

  12. [12]

    Klemm, E

    W. Klemm, E. Voss, K. Geiersberger, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1948, 256, 15-24

    work page 1948

  13. [13]

    Dohmeier, C

    C. Dohmeier, C. Robl, M. Tacke, H. Schnöckel, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 564-565

    work page 1991

  14. [14]

    a) R. A. Fischer, J. Weiß, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2830 -2850; b) A. Hofmann, T. Tröster, T. Kupfer, H. Braunschweig, Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 3421-3428; c) H. Sitzmann, M. F. Lappert, C. Dohmeier, C. Üffing, H. Schnöckel, J. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 561, 203 -208; d) C. Dohmeier, E. Baum, A. Ecker, R. Köppe, H. Schnöckel, Organometallics 1996, 15, 4702-4706

    work page 1999

  15. [15]

    Schulz, H

    S. Schulz, H. W. Roesky, H. J. Koch, G. M. Sheldrick, D. Stalke, A. Kuhn, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1729-1731

    work page 1993

  16. [16]

    Bischoff, S

    I.-A. Bischoff, S. Danés, P. Thoni, B. Morgenstern, D. M. Andrada, C. Müller, J. Lambert, E. C. J. Gießelmann, M. Zimmer, A. Schäfer, Nat. Chem. 2024, 16, 1093- 1100

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    C. Cui, H. W. Roesky, H.-G. Schmidt, M. Noltemeyer, H. Hao, F. Cimpoesu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4274-4276

    work page 2000

  18. [18]

    Tsai, Coord

    Y.-C. Tsai, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2012, 256, 722-758. 98

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    X. Li, X. Cheng, H. Song, C. Cui, Organometallics 2007, 26, 1039-1043

    work page 2007

  20. [20]

    Grams, J

    S. Grams, J. Mai, J. Langer, S. Harder, Organometallics 2022, 41, 2862-2867

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    J. D. Queen, A. Lehmann, J. C. Fettinger, H. M. Tuononen, P. P. Power, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 20554-20559

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    a) A. Hinz, M. P. Müller, Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 12532-12535; b) X. Zhang, L. L. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 27062-27069

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    S. K. Mellerup, Y. Cui, F. Fantuzzi, P. Schmid, J. T. Goettel, G. Bélanger-Chabot, M. Arrowsmith, I. Krummenacher, Q. Ye, V. Engel, B. Engels, H. Braunschweig, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 16954-16960

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Dohmeier, H

    C. Dohmeier, H. Krautscheid, H. Schnöckel, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1995, 33, 2482- 2483

    work page 1995

  25. [25]

    Üffing, A

    C. Üffing, A. Ecker, R. Köppe, H. Schnöckel, Organometallics 1998, 17, 2373-2375

    work page 1998

  26. [26]

    Weiss, T

    D. Weiss, T. Steinke, M. Winter, R. A. Fischer, N. Fröhlich, J. Uddin, G. Frenking, Organometallics 2000, 19, 4583-4588

    work page 2000

  27. [27]

    Buchin, T

    B. Buchin, T. Steinke, C. Gemel, T. Cadenbach, R. A. Fischer, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2005, 631, 2756-2762

    work page 2005

  28. [28]

    A. Puls, P. Jerabek, W. Kurashige, M. Förster, M. Molon, T. Bollermann, M. Winter, C. Gemel, Y. Negishi, G. Frenking, R. A. Fischer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 4327-4331

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Hornung, M

    J. Hornung, M. Muhr, M. Schütz, P. Heiß, J. Stephan, C. Jandl, C. Gemel, S. Kahlal, J.-Y. Saillard, R. A. Fischer, Inorg. Chem. 2023, 62, 11381-11389

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Hornung, J

    J. Hornung, J. Weßing, P. Jerabek, C. Gemel, A. Pöthig, G. Frenking, R. A. Fischer, Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 12657-12664

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Steinke, C

    T. Steinke, C. Gemel, M. Cokoja, M. Winter, R. A. Fischer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2299-2302

    work page 2004

  32. [32]

    P. Heiß, J. Hornung, C. Gemel, R. A. Fischer, Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 4332-4335. 99

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Molon, C

    M. Molon, C. Gemel, R. A. Fischer, J. Organomet. Chem. 2014, 751, 573-578

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    Cadenbach, C

    T. Cadenbach, C. Gemel, T. Bollermann, R. A. Fischer, Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 5021- 5026

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    Steinke, C

    T. Steinke, C. Gemel, M. Winter, R. A. Fischer, Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 1636-1646

    work page 2005

  36. [36]

    Ganesamoorthy, J

    C. Ganesamoorthy, J. Weßing, C. Kroll, R. W. Seidel, C. Gemel, R. A. Fischer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7943-7947

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    Schütz, C

    M. Schütz, C. Gemel, M. Muhr, C. Jandl, S. Kahlal, J. -Y. Saillard, R. A. Fischer, Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 6588-6599

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Weßing, C

    J. Weßing, C. Ganesamoorthy, S. Kahlal, R. Marchal, C. Gemel, O. Cador, A. C. H. Da Silva, J. L. F. Da Silva, J.-Y. Saillard, R. A. Fischer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 14630-14634

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Antsiburov, M

    I. Antsiburov, M. Schütz, R. Bühler, M. Muhr, J. Stephan, C. Gemel, W. Klein, S. Kahlal, J.-Y. Saillard, R. A. Fischer, Inorg. Chem. 2024, 63, 3749-3756

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Weßing, C

    J. Weßing, C. Göbel, B. Weber, C. Gemel, R. A. Fischer, Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 3517-3525

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    Dankert, E

    F. Dankert, E. Hevia, Chem. Eur. J. 2024, 30, e202304336

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Kempter, C

    A. Kempter, C. Gemel, R. A. Fischer, Chem. Commun. 2006, 1551-1553

    work page 2006

  43. [43]

    Kempter, C

    A. Kempter, C. Gemel, R. A. Fischer, Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 2990-3000

    work page 2007

  44. [44]

    K. L. Mears, C. R. Stennett, E. K. Taskinen, C. E. Knapp, C. J. Carmalt, H. M. Tuononen, P. P. Power, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 19874-19878

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Bakewell, B

    C. Bakewell, B. J. Ward, A. J. P. White, M. R. Crimmin, Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 2348- 2356

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Brand, H

    S. Brand, H. Elsen, J. Langer, S. Grams, S. Harder, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 15496-15503

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    Paparo, C

    A. Paparo, C. D. Smith, C. Jones, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 11459-11463. 100

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Gorgas, A

    N. Gorgas, A. J. P. White, M. R. Crimmin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 8770-8777

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    M. L. H. Green, P. Mountford, G. J. Smout, S. R. Speel, Polyhedron 1990, 9, 2763- 2765

    work page 1990

  50. [50]

    D. Loos, H. Schnöckel, J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 463, 37-40

    work page 1993

  51. [51]

    Jutzi, L

    P. Jutzi, L. O. Schebaum, J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 654, 176-179

    work page 2002

  52. [52]

    D. Loos, E. Baum, A. Ecker, H. Schnöckel, A. J. Downs, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997, 36, 860-862

    work page 1997

  53. [53]

    W. Uhl, W. Hiller, M. Layh, W. Schwarz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1992, 31, 1364-1366

    work page 1992

  54. [54]

    Hiller, M

    W. Hiller, M. Layh, W. Uhl, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1991, 30, 324-326

    work page 1991

  55. [55]

    W. Uhl, M. Benter, Chem. Commun. 1999, 771-772

    work page 1999

  56. [56]

    a) N. J. Hardman, B. E. Eichler, P. P. Power, Chem. Commun. 2000, 1991-1992; b) S. L. Choong, W. D. Woodul, A. Stasch, C. Schenk, C. Jones, Aust. J. Chem. 2011, 64, 1173-1176; c) T. Richter, S. Thum, O. P. E. Townrow, M. Wiesinger, J. Langer, S. Harder, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2024, 650, e202400044

    work page 2000

  57. [57]

    Zhong, S

    M. Zhong, S. Sinhababu, H. W. Roesky, Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 1351-1364

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    a) M. C. Kuchta, J. B. Bonanno, G. Parkin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10914- 10915; b) H. V. R. Dias, W. Jin, Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 815-819

    work page 1996

  59. [59]

    Jones, P

    a) C. Jones, P. C. Junk, J. A. Platts, A. Stasch, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2206- 2207; b) G. Jin, C. Jones, P. C. Junk, A. Stasch, W. D. Woodul, New. J. Chem. 2008, 32, 835-842; c) J. Overgaard, C. Jones, D. Dange, J. A. Platts, Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 8418-8426

    work page 2006

  60. [60]

    Zheng, A

    X. Zheng, A. Heilmann, C. McManus, S. Aldridge, Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 3159- 3165

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    a) N. J. Hardman, R. J. Wright, A. D. Phillips, P. P. Power, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2667-2679; b) N. J. Hardman, R. J. Wright, A. D. Phillips, P. P. Power, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2842-2844. 101

    work page 2003

  62. [62]

    Z. Zhu, R. C. Fischer, B. D. Ellis, E. Rivard, W. A. Merrill, M. M. Olmstead, P. P. Power, J. D. Guo, S. Nagase, L. Pu, Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 5263-5272

    work page 2009

  63. [63]

    S. H. F. Schreiner, T. Rüffer, R. Kretschmer, Nat. Synth. 2025, 4, 67-74

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    Takaya, Chem

    J. Takaya, Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 1964-1981

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Jutzi, B

    P. Jutzi, B. Neumann, G. Reumann, H. -G. Stammler, Organometallics 1998, 17, 1305-1314

    work page 1998

  66. [66]

    Cokoja, T

    M. Cokoja, T. Steinke, C. Gemel, T. Welzel, M. Winter, K. Merz, R. A. Fischer, J. Organomet. Chem. 2003, 684, 277-286

    work page 2003

  67. [67]

    Jutzi, G

    P. Jutzi, G. Reumann, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2000, 2237-2244

    work page 2000

  68. [68]

    Jutzi, B

    P. Jutzi, B. Neumann, L. O. Schebaum, A. Stammler, H. -G. Stammler, Organometallics 1999, 18, 4462-4464

    work page 1999

  69. [69]

    W. Uhl, M. Benter, S. Melle, W. Saak, G. Frenking, J. Uddin, Organometallics 1999, 18, 3778-3780

    work page 1999

  70. [70]

    Naglav, B

    D. Naglav, B. Tobey, A. Schnepf, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 2013, 4146-4149

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    Kempter, C

    A. Kempter, C. Gemel, T. Cadenbach, R. A. Fischer, Organometallics 2007, 26, 4257-4264

    work page 2007

  72. [72]

    Bollermann, A

    T. Bollermann, A. Puls, C. Gemel, T. Cadenbach, R. A. Fischer, Dalton Trans. 2009, 1372-1377

    work page 2009

  73. [73]

    Jutzi, B

    P. Jutzi, B. Neumann, L. O. Schebaum, A. Stammler, H. -G. Stammler, Organometallics 2000, 19, 1445-1447

    work page 2000

  74. [74]

    M. Muhr, R. Bühler, H. Liang, J. Gilch, C. Jandl, S. Kahlal, J. -Y. Saillard, C. Gemel, R. A. Fischer, Chem. Eur. J. 2022, 28, e202200887

    work page 2022

  75. [75]

    Bühler, M

    R. Bühler, M. Muhr, J. Stephan, R. A. Wolf, M. Schütz, C. Gemel, R. A. Fischer, Dalton Trans. 2023, 52, 10905-10910. 102

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    Cadenbach, T

    T. Cadenbach, T. Bollermann, C. Gemel, R. A. Fischer, Dalton Trans. 2009, 322- 329

    work page 2009

  77. [77]

    Cadenbach, C

    T. Cadenbach, C. Gemel, R. Schmid, S. Block, R. A. Fischer, Dalton Trans. 2004, 3171-3172

    work page 2004

  78. [78]

    Patmore, W

    a) D.-J. Patmore, W. A. G. Graham, Inorg. Chem. 1966, 5, 1586-1590; b) D. Patmore, W. A. Graham, Inorg. Chem. 1967, 6, 981-988; c) A. T. T. Hsieh, M. J. Mays, Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 1971, 7, 223-225; d) A. T. T. Hsieh, Inorg. Chim. Acta 1975, 14, 87-104; e) M. Cokoja, C. Gemel, T. Steinke, F. Schröder, R. A. Fischer, Dalton Trans. 2005, 44-54

    work page 1966

  79. [79]

    Cadenbach, C

    T. Cadenbach, C. Gemel, R. Schmid, M. Halbherr, K. Yusenko, M. Cokoja, R. A. Fischer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3872-3876

    work page 2009

  80. [80]

    Uddin, G

    a) J. Uddin, G. Frenking, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1683-1693; b) J. Uddin, C. Boehme, G. Frenking, Organometallics 2000, 19, 571-582

    work page 2001

Showing first 80 references.