pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.04263 · v4 · pith:URKRVVGPnew · submitted 2025-11-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall

Spin responses of a disordered helical superconducting edge under Zeeman field

Zeinab Bakhshipour , Mir Vahid Hosseini This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 19:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords helical edge statesdisorderZeeman fieldsuperconductivityLuttinger liquidrenormalization groupspin conductancetopological insulator
0
0 comments X

The pith

Zeeman field amplifies superconducting gap in attractive regime and stabilizes disorder in repulsive regime on helical edges.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how disorder influences charge, spin, and superconducting correlations on the helical edge of a 2D topological insulator when a Zeeman field and superconductivity are also present. Through bosonization and renormalization-group analysis, it demonstrates that the Zeeman field governs the competition between these effects depending on the interaction regime. In attractive interactions the field strengthens the superconducting gap, while in repulsive interactions it prolongs the regime where disorder remains influential. Disorder itself produces logarithmic suppression of transverse density-wave correlations yet supplies positive logarithmic corrections that reinforce superconducting pair correlations, which in turn alters the scaling of spin conductance.

Core claim

The central claim is that the Zeeman field controls the competition between superconductivity and impurity scattering on the helical edge: it amplifies the superconducting gap when interactions are attractive and stabilizes impurity effects by keeping the system longer in the disorder-relevant regime when interactions are repulsive. Disorder induces logarithmic suppression of transverse density-wave correlations while simultaneously introducing positive logarithmic corrections that enhance superconducting pair correlations and their stability. These modifications directly change the scaling of spin conductance and furnish experimentally accessible signatures of the disorder-superconductivity

What carries the argument

Bosonized Luttinger-liquid model of the helical edge whose couplings are evolved by renormalization-group equations that include Zeeman, superconducting, and disorder terms.

If this is right

  • Increasing Zeeman field strength amplifies the superconducting gap in the attractive interaction regime.
  • In the repulsive regime the Zeeman field extends the range where disorder remains relevant.
  • Disorder produces logarithmic suppression of transverse density-wave correlations.
  • Disorder supplies positive logarithmic corrections that enhance superconducting pair correlations.
  • The resulting changes modify the scaling of spin conductance in measurable ways.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • External magnetic fields could serve as a practical knob for tuning edge-state transport in topological devices.
  • Analogous logarithmic corrections may appear in other one-dimensional systems with competing interactions.
  • Temperature-dependent conductance measurements could isolate the predicted logarithmic terms from power-law contributions.

Load-bearing premise

The helical edge states remain accurately described by a one-dimensional bosonized Luttinger-liquid model even after superconductivity, Zeeman field, and disorder are added, so renormalization-group scaling captures the dominant behavior without higher-order corrections becoming essential.

What would settle it

Measure spin conductance versus Zeeman-field strength and disorder amplitude in a real topological-insulator edge device to check whether the conductance follows the predicted regime-dependent amplification or stabilization and the logarithmic corrections to pair correlations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.04263 by Mir Vahid Hosseini, Zeinab Bakhshipour.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (Color online) Schematic of a superconducting PMH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (Color online) Luttinger parameter as function the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (Color online) Flow trajectories and relevant regim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online) Schematic of the superconducting par [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) Temperature dependence of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Color online) The long-range charge density wave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (Color online) The long-range spin density wave in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate analytically and numerically the effects of disorder on the helical edge of the 2D topological insulator in the presence of the Zeeman field and superconductivity. Employing bosonization and a renormalization-group analysis, we study how impurity potentials modify charge- and spin-density wave correlations as well as superconducting pair correlations. Our results reveal that the Zeeman field controls the competition: in the attractive regime, it amplifies the superconducting gap, while in the repulsive regime, it stabilizes impurity effects by keeping the system longer in the relevant regime for disorder. We also find that disorder induces logarithmic suppression of transverse density-wave correlations, while at the same time introducing positive logarithmic corrections that enhance superconducting pair correlations and contribute to their stability. These effects directly modify the scaling of spin conductance, providing experimentally accessible signatures of the interplay between disorder and superconductivity in topological edge channels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the effects of disorder on the helical edge of a 2D topological insulator in the presence of a Zeeman field and superconductivity. Employing bosonization and renormalization-group (RG) analysis supplemented by numerical results, it claims that the Zeeman field controls the competition between superconductivity and disorder: amplifying the superconducting gap in the attractive regime while stabilizing impurity effects in the repulsive regime. Disorder is reported to induce logarithmic suppression of transverse density-wave correlations alongside positive logarithmic corrections that enhance superconducting pair correlations, with direct consequences for the scaling of spin conductance.

Significance. If the results hold, the work provides concrete predictions for how Zeeman tuning and disorder interplay in topological edge channels, yielding experimentally accessible signatures in spin conductance. The combination of analytical RG flows with numerical cross-checks is a strength that supports falsifiable scaling statements. The findings extend standard Luttinger-liquid treatments of helical edges to the simultaneous presence of pairing, Zeeman, and random potentials.

major comments (2)
  1. [Bosonization and RG analysis section] The central RG analysis rests on the assumption that the helical edge remains a single-mode Luttinger liquid under the simultaneous inclusion of Zeeman, superconducting cosine, and disorder terms. The manuscript does not explicitly demonstrate that no additional relevant operators are generated that would renormalize K or invalidate the lowest-order flow equations before the disorder or pairing scales are reached; this assumption is load-bearing for the claimed sign of the logarithmic corrections and the Zeeman-controlled competition.
  2. [Results on correlations and conductance] The statements on logarithmic suppression of transverse density-wave correlations and positive corrections to pair correlations (abstract and results) require explicit derivation of the scaling dimensions or flow equations to confirm they arise at the same perturbative order and are not artifacts of truncation. Without the full set of beta functions or the explicit form of the disorder-averaged correlators, it is unclear whether the reported scalings are fully justified or depend on post-hoc parameter choices.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model Hamiltonian] Notation for the Luttinger parameter K and the Zeeman coupling strength should be defined consistently in the bosonization Hamiltonian to avoid ambiguity when comparing attractive and repulsive regimes.
  2. [Numerical results] The numerical section would benefit from explicit statements on system size, disorder averaging procedure, and how finite-size effects are controlled when extracting the logarithmic corrections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below with clarifications and indicate the revisions we will implement to strengthen the presentation of the RG analysis and correlation functions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Bosonization and RG analysis section] The central RG analysis rests on the assumption that the helical edge remains a single-mode Luttinger liquid under the simultaneous inclusion of Zeeman, superconducting cosine, and disorder terms. The manuscript does not explicitly demonstrate that no additional relevant operators are generated that would renormalize K or invalidate the lowest-order flow equations before the disorder or pairing scales are reached; this assumption is load-bearing for the claimed sign of the logarithmic corrections and the Zeeman-controlled competition.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of the operator content would improve clarity. In the bosonization of the helical edge, the system is described by a single chiral boson with Luttinger parameter K. The Zeeman term, superconducting cosine, and disorder potential are the leading perturbations whose scaling dimensions are set by K. At the perturbative order used in our RG equations, no additional operators with scaling dimension less than 2 are generated before the flows reach strong coupling; this follows from the structure of the cosine and random-potential terms and is consistent with standard treatments of helical Luttinger liquids. The numerical simulations corroborate the resulting flows and scaling. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the RG section that lists possible higher-order operators and demonstrates their irrelevance in the relevant regime. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on correlations and conductance] The statements on logarithmic suppression of transverse density-wave correlations and positive corrections to pair correlations (abstract and results) require explicit derivation of the scaling dimensions or flow equations to confirm they arise at the same perturbative order and are not artifacts of truncation. Without the full set of beta functions or the explicit form of the disorder-averaged correlators, it is unclear whether the reported scalings are fully justified or depend on post-hoc parameter choices.

    Authors: The logarithmic corrections originate from the disorder-averaged correlators obtained by integrating the RG flows. The transverse density-wave correlator acquires a logarithmic suppression from the disorder renormalization, while the superconducting pair correlator receives a positive correction whose sign is controlled by the Zeeman-induced shift in the effective scaling dimension. These corrections appear at the same perturbative order in the disorder strength. To address the concern, we will include the complete set of beta functions in a new appendix and derive the explicit disorder-averaged correlators from the integrated flows, showing that the reported signs and scalings follow directly without additional parameter tuning. The numerical data already support these analytical results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Standard bosonization and RG analysis with no reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper applies established bosonization to the helical edge Hamiltonian, augments it with Zeeman, pairing, and disorder terms, and performs a standard renormalization-group analysis of the resulting scaling dimensions and flows. The reported competition between regimes, amplification of the gap, stabilization of impurities, and logarithmic corrections to density-wave and pair correlations are direct consequences of the lowest-order RG equations acting on the bosonized operators; none of these outputs are defined in terms of the inputs, fitted to a subset of the data, or obtained via a self-citation chain that itself lacks independent verification. The derivation remains self-contained within the conventional Luttinger-liquid framework and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatzes imported from the authors' prior work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the applicability of standard 1D bosonization and RG methods to the helical edge with added terms; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The low-energy physics of the helical edge is captured by a bosonized Luttinger liquid description
    Standard modeling choice for 1D topological insulator edges invoked implicitly by the use of bosonization.
  • domain assumption Renormalization-group analysis of disorder and Zeeman perturbations yields the dominant scaling of correlation functions
    Core technique stated in the abstract for determining relevance of interactions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5677 in / 1550 out tokens · 88249 ms · 2026-05-21T19:24:30.566235+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In this case, Eqs. ( 10)-(13) simplify as Himp− c = − ∫ dxVcδ(x) 1√ 4π∂xΦ(x,τ ) − Vc sin(2ϑ kF ) πa 0 cos( √ 4π Φ(0,τ )), (14) Hx imp− s = Vsx cos(2ϑ kF )√ 4π ∂xΘ(0,τ ), (15) Hy imp− s = ∫ dxVsyδ(x) sin(2ϑ kF )√ 4π ∂xΦ(x,τ ) + Vsy πa 0 cos( √ 4π Φ(0,τ )), (16) Hz imp− s = Vsz cos(2ϑ kF ) πa 0 sin( √ 4π Φ(0,τ )). (17) One observes that within the PMH state...

    work page

  2. [2]

    That is, in the absence of Zeeman, electron repulsions are a significant factor in creating the impurity gap

    indicates that the impurity coefficients become relevant at K < 1. That is, in the absence of Zeeman, electron repulsions are a significant factor in creating the impurity gap. When the Zeeman field turns on,K decreases from its Zeeman-free value (see Fig. 2(a), pushing the impurity gap toward the stronger relevant regime. In other words, the Zeeman field enha...

    work page

  3. [3]

    At K < 1/ 2, where superconductivity is in an irrelevant regime, impurity and Zeeman tend to a strong coupling

    Three boundary points K with values of 1 / 2, 1, and 2 are identified for su- perconductivity, impurity, and Zeeman, respectively. At K < 1/ 2, where superconductivity is in an irrelevant regime, impurity and Zeeman tend to a strong coupling. At 1/ 2< K <1, despite the strong Zeeman, the super- conductivity coefficient starts to gap out spin states and compe...

    work page

  4. [4]

    In contrast, the type of correlation introduced by the backward term in Eq

    has an increasing effect on the correction of resistance due to superconductiv- ity with decreasing temperature. In contrast, the type of correlation introduced by the backward term in Eq. (

    work page

  5. [5]

    Therefore, RG-coupled form Rbackward imp− c using Eq

    requires that the renormalized form of the coefficient Vc(l∗ ) be used. Therefore, RG-coupled form Rbackward imp− c using Eq. ( 20) is given by Rbackward imp− c ∝ Y 2Vc(l = 0) 2 sin2(2ϑ kF ) f (K − 1)T 2K+2K − 1− 5 ( 1 + g(K − 1) T 2 ) . (27) In the helical Luttinger liquid framework, the renor- malization of the impurity potential provides a crucial mechan...

    work page

  6. [6]

    resulting FIG. 4. (Color online) Schematic of the superconducting par - tial mixed helical edge in the presence of many impurities. in the corrections, Rbackward imp− y ∝ Y 2Vsy(l = 0) 2 f (K − 1)T 2K+2K − 1− 5 ( 1 + g(K − 1) T 2 ) , (28) Rbackward imp− z ∝ Y 2Vsz(l = 0) 2 cos2(2ϑ kF ) f (K − 1)T 2K+2K − 1− 5 ( 1 + g(K − 1) T 2 ) . (29) The power-law damp...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Remarkably, while a single impurity mainly provides insight into scaling laws and boundary effects, a finite impurity density is more representative of realistic experimental conditions, where the interplay of disorder, Zeeman field, and supercon- ductivity may give rise to rich localization–delocalization 7 crossovers and even phase transitions between topo...

    work page

  8. [8]

    (34) For 0

    the correction of disorder to re- sistance is found as, RL dis = −Y 2D(l = 0)( 2πa 0T v )2K+2K − 1− 6. (34) For 0. 38 < K <3/ 2, decreasing the temperature in- creases the correction term of the disorder. By separating this range into repulsive (0 . 38 < K <1) and attractive interactions (1 < K <3/ 2), a richer interpretation can be achieved. As mentioned...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Kane and E.J

    C.L. Kane and E.J. Mele, Quantum Spin Hall Effect in Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005)

    work page 2005

  10. [10]

    Konig, S

    M. Konig, S. Wiedmann, C. Brune, A. Roth, H. Buh- mann, L. Molenkamp, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Quan- tum Spin Hall Insulator State in HgTe Quantum Wells, Science 318, 766 (2007)

    work page 2007

  11. [11]

    C. Wu, B.A. Bernevig, and S.-C. Zhang, Helical Liquid and the Edge of Quantum Spin Hall Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 106401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  12. [12]

    Bernevig, and S.-C

    B.A. Bernevig, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum Spin Hall Ef- fect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 106802 (2006)

    work page 2006

  13. [13]

    Hasan and C.L

    M.Z. Hasan and C.L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological in- sulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C.H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Spin Hall effects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213 (2015)

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    Fleckenstein,, N

    C. Fleckenstein,, N. Traverso Ziani, A. Calzona, M. Sas- setti, and B. Trauzettel, Formation and detection of Ma- jorana modes in quantum spin Hall trenches, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125303 (2021). 16

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Heedt, N

    S. Heedt, N. Traverso. Ziani, F. Cr´ epin, et al., Signatures of interaction-induced helical gaps in nanowire quantum point contacts, Nat. Phys 13, 563–567 (2017)

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Fleckenstein, N

    C. Fleckenstein, N. Traverso Ziani, and B. Trauzettel, Conductance signatures of odd-frequency superconduc- tivity in quantum spin Hall systems using a quantum point contact, Phys. Rev. B 97, 134523 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Strunz, J

    J. Strunz, J. Wiedenmann, C. Fleckenstein, et al., Inter- acting topological edge channels, Nat. Phys. 16, 83–88 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Copenhaver, and J

    J. Copenhaver, and J. I. V¨ ayrynen, Edge spin transport in the disordered two-dimensional topological insulator W T e2, Phys. Rev. B 105, 115402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Giamarchi and H.J

    T. Giamarchi and H.J. Schulz, Correlation functions of one-dimensional quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 39, 4620 (1989)

    work page 1989

  21. [21]

    Bahari and M

    M. Bahari and M. V. Hosseini, Zeeman-field-induced nontrivial topological phases in a one-dimensional spin- orbit-coupled dimerized lattice, Phys. Rev. B 94, 125119 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Bahari and M.V

    M. Bahari and M.V. Hosseini, One-dimensional topolog- ical metal. Phys. Rev. B 99, 155128 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Jangjan, and M

    M. Jangjan, and M. V. Hosseini, Topological phase tran- sition between a normal insulator and a topological metal state in a quasi-one-dimensional system, Scientific Re- ports 11, 12966 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Jangjan, L

    M. Jangjan, L. E. F. F. Torres, and M. V. Hosseini, Floquet topological phase transitions in a periodically quenched dimer, Phys. Rev. B 106, 224306 (2022)

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    X. L. Qi, and Sh. Ch. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    J. Sun, S. Gangadharaiah, and O.A. Starykh, Spin-Orbit- Induced Spin-DensityWave in a Quantum Wire, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 126408 (2007)

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    Manchon, H

    A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, et al. New perspec- tives for Rashba spin–orbit coupling, Nature Mater 14, 871–882 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Fleckenstein, F

    C. Fleckenstein, F. Keidel, B. Trauzettel, et al., The in- visible Majorana bound state at the helical edge, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 227, 1377–1386 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Braunecker, P

    B. Braunecker, P. Simon, and D. Loss, Nuclear mag- netism and electron order in interacting one-dimensional conductors Phys. Rev. B 80, 165119 (2009)

    work page 2009

  30. [30]

    Braunecker, P

    B. Braunecker, P. Simon, and D. Loss, Nuclear Mag- netism and Electronic Order in 13 C Nanotubes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 116403 (2009)

    work page 2009

  31. [31]

    Braunecker, G

    B. Braunecker, G. I. Japaridze, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Spin-selective Peierls transition in interacting on e- dimensional conductors with spin-orbit interaction, Phys . Rev. B 82, 045127 (2010)

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    Braunecker and P

    B. Braunecker and P. Simon, Self-stabilizing temperature-driven crossover between topological and nontopological ordered phases in one-dimensional conductors, Phys. Rev. B 92, 241410 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Ch.-H. Hsu, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Nuclear-spin-induced localization of edge states in two- dimensional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 96, 081405(R) (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Ch.-H. Hsu, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Effects of nuclear spins on the transport properties of the edge of two-dimensional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 97, 125432 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires, Phys.-Usp. 44, 131 (2001)

    work page 2001

  36. [36]

    Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep

    J. Alicea, New directions in the pursuit of Majorana fermions in solid state systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076501 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Search for Majorana Fermions in Superconductors, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 113-136 (2013)

    work page 2013

  38. [38]

    Sato and Y

    M. Sato and Y. Ando, Topological superconductors: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    R. M. Lutchyn, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Majo- rana Fermions and a Topological Phase Transition in Semiconductor-Superconductor Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 077001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  40. [40]

    C. P. Orth, R. P. Tiwari, T. Meng, and T. L. Schmidt, Non-Abelian parafermions in time-reversal-invariant in- teracting helical systems, Phys. Rev. B 91, 081406(R) (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    C. J. Pedder, T. Meng, R. P. Tiwari, and T. L. Schmidt, Missing Shapiro steps and the 8 π -periodic Josephson effect in interacting helical electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 96, 165429 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    E. M. Stoudenmire, J. Alicea, O. A. Starykh, and M. P. A. Fisher, Interaction effects in topological supercon- ducting wires supporting Majorana fermions, Phys. Rev. B 84, 014503 (2011)

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    Gangadharaiah, B

    S. Gangadharaiah, B. Braunecker, P. Simon, and D. Loss, Majorana Edge States in Interacting One-Dimensional Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 036801 (2011)

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    E. Sela, A. Altland, and A. Rosch, Majorana fermions in strongly interacting helical liquids, Phys. Rev. B 84, 085114 (2011)

    work page 2011

  45. [45]

    Mourik, K

    V. Mourik, K. Zuo, S. M. Frolov, S. R. Plissard, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Signatures of Majo- rana Fermions in Hybrid Superconductor-Semiconductor Nanowire Devices, Science, 336, 1003-1007 (2012)

    work page 2012

  46. [46]

    Prada, P

    E. Prada, P. San-Jose, M. W. A. de Moor. et al. From An- dreev to Majorana bound states in hybrid superconduc- tor–semiconductor nanowires, Nat Rev Phys 2, 575–594 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Aghaee, A

    M. Aghaee, A. Akkala, Z. Alam, R. Ali, A. A. Ramirez, M. Andrzejczuk, A. E. Antipov, P. Aseev, M. Astafev et al. (Microsoft Quantum), InAs-Al hybrid devices passing the topological gap protocol, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245423 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Sato, Non-Abelian statistics of axion strings, Phys

    M. Sato, Non-Abelian statistics of axion strings, Phys. Lett. B 575, 126 (2003)

    work page 2003

  49. [49]

    Alicea, and P

    J. Alicea, and P. Fendley, Topological Phases with Parafermions: Theory and Blueprints, Annu. Rev. Con- dens. Matter Phys. 7, 119 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    S. D. Sarma, M. Freedman and Ch. Nayak, Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation, npj Quantum Inf 1, 15001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  51. [51]

    Aasen, M

    D. Aasen, M. Hell, R. V. Mishmash, Milestones Toward Majorana-Based Quantum Computing, Phys. Rev. X 6, 031016 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Yazdani, F

    A. Yazdani, F. V. Oppen, B. I. Halperin, and A. Yacoby, Hunting for Majoranas, Science, 380, (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    D. J. Scalapino, A common thread: The pairing inter- action for unconventional superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1383 (2012)

    work page 2012

  54. [54]

    Xu, and J

    C. Xu, and J. E. Moore, Stability of the quantum spin Hall effect: Effects of interactions, disorder, and Z2 topol- ogy, Phys. Rev. B 73, 045322 (2006)

    work page 2006

  55. [55]

    Datta and B

    S. Datta and B. Das, Electronic analog of the electro optic modulator, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 665 (1990). 17

    work page 1990

  56. [56]

    ˇZuti´ c, J

    I. ˇZuti´ c, J. Fabian, and S. D. Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004)

    work page 2004

  57. [57]

    Fabian, A

    J. Fabian, A. Matos-Abiague, C. Ertler, P. Stano, and I. ˇZuti´ c, Semiconductor Spintronics, Acta Phys. Slovaca. Rev. Tutorials 57, 565 (2007)

    work page 2007

  58. [58]

    Giamarchi and H

    T. Giamarchi and H. J. Schulz, Anderson localization and interactions in one-dimensional metals, Phys. Rev. B 37, 325 (1988)

    work page 1988

  59. [59]

    Pooyan, M.V

    S. Pooyan, M.V. Hosseini, Enhanced and stable spin Hall conductivity in a disordered time-reversal and in- version symmetry broken topological insulator thin film, Sci. Rep. 12, 15379 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    Heydari, H

    M. Heydari, H. Moghaddasi, M. V. Hosseini, M. Askari, Promoted current-induced spin polarization in inver- sion symmetry broken topological insulator thin films, arXiv:2505.17294v1, (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Gangadharaiah, J

    S. Gangadharaiah, J. Sun, and O.A. Starykh, Phys. Rev. B 78, 054436 (2008)

    work page 2008

  62. [62]

    D. E. Liu, and A. Levchenko, Tunneling spectroscopy of a spiral Luttinger liquid in contact with superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 88, 155315 (2013)

    work page 2013

  63. [63]

    Virtanek, and P

    P. Virtanek, and P. Recher, Signatures of Rashba spin- orbit interaction in the superconducting proximity effect in helical Luttinger liquids, Phys. Rev. B 85, 035310 (2012)

    work page 2012

  64. [64]

    Fidkowski, J

    L. Fidkowski, J. Alicea, N. H. Lindner, R. M. Lutchyn, and M. P. A. Fisher, Universal transport signatures of Majorana fermions in superconductor-Luttinger liquid junctions, Phys. Rev. B 85, 245121 (2012)

    work page 2012

  65. [65]

    Braunecker, and P

    B. Braunecker, and P. Simon, Interplay between Classical Magnetic Moments and Superconductivity in Quantum One-Dimensional Conductors: Toward a Self-Sustained Topological Majorana Phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 147202 (2013)

    work page 2013

  66. [66]

    Y. Wang, V. Ponomarenko, Zh. Wan, K. W. West, K. W. Baldwin, L. N. Pfeiffer, Y. Lyanda-Geller, and L. P. Rokhinson, Transport in helical Luttinger liquids in the fractional quantum Hall regime, Nature Communications 12, 5312 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Rice, A.R

    M.J. Rice, A.R. Bishop, J.A. Krumhansl, and S.E. Trullinger, Weakly Pinned Fr¨ ohlich Charge-Density- Wave Condensates: A New, Nonlinear, Current-Carrying Elementary Excitation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 432 (1976)

    work page 1976

  68. [68]

    Bouchoule, R

    I. Bouchoule, R. Citro, T. Duty, T. Giamarchi, R. G. Hulet, M. Klanjsek, E. Orignac, B. Weber, Platforms for the realization and characterization of Tomonaga Lut- tinger liquids, arXiv:2501.12097

    work page arXiv

  69. [69]

    Mahdavifar, Z

    S. Mahdavifar, Z. Bakhshipour, J. Vahedi, M. R. Soltani, Thermal Classical and Quantum Correlations in Spin-1/2 XX Chains with the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 28, 1807–1813 (2015)

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    C. L. Kane, and M. P. A. Fisher, Transmission through barriers and resonant tunneling in an interacting one- dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. B 46, 15233 (1992)

    work page 1992

  71. [71]

    Privitera, N

    L. Privitera, N. Traverso Ziani, I. Safi, and B. Trauzettel, Backscattering off a driven Rashba impurity at the helical edge, Phys. Rev. B 102, 195413 (2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    Tanaka, A

    Y. Tanaka, A. Furusaki, and K. A. Matveev, Conduc- tance of a Helical Edge Liquid Coupled to a Magnetic Impurity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236402 (2011)

    work page 2011

  73. [73]

    Fu, and C.L

    L. Fu, and C.L. Kane, Superconducting Proximity Effect and Majorana Fermions at the Surface of a Topological Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008)

    work page 2008

  74. [74]

    Schmidt, S

    T.L. Schmidt, S. Rachel, F. v. Oppen, and L.I. Glaz- man, Inelastic Electron Backscattering in a Generic He- lical Edge Channel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 156402 (2012)

    work page 2012

  75. [75]

    Braunecker, A

    B. Braunecker, A. Str¨ om, and G.I. Japaridze, Magnetic- field switchable metal-insulator transitions in a quasihe- lical conductor, Phys. Rev. B 87, 075151 (2013)

    work page 2013

  76. [76]

    T.-C. Wei, D. Pekker, A. Rogachev, A. Bezryadin and P. M. Goldbart, Enhancing superconductivity: Magnetic impurities and their quenching by magnetic fields, E. P. L. 75 943 (2006)

    work page 2006

  77. [77]

    Eriksson, A

    E. Eriksson, A. Zazunov, P. Sodano, and R. Egger, Two- impurity helical Majorana problem, Phys. Rev. B 91, 064501 (2015)

    work page 2015

  78. [78]

    Soori, S

    A. Soori, S. Das, and S. Rao, Magnetic-field-induced Fabry-P´ erot resonances in helical edge states, Phys. Rev. B 86, 125312 (2012)

    work page 2012

  79. [79]

    Wozny, K

    S. Wozny, K. Vyborny, W. Belzig, and S.I. Erlingsson, Gap formation in helical edge states with magnetic im- purities, Phys. Rev. B 98, 165423 (2018)

    work page 2018

  80. [80]

    Hosseini, Z

    M.V. Hosseini, Z. Karimi, J. Davoodi, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 33 , 085801 (2020)

    work page 2020

Showing first 80 references.