Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Phonon Thermal Hall Effect: The Roles of Disorder, Annealing, and Metallic Contacts

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that the phonon thermal Hall effect in SrTiO3 is an intrinsic property of an ideal crystal lattice, suppressed by disorder and internal strain, and not caused by metallic contacts.

desk verdict Useful experimental control of the SrTiO3 phonon thermal Hall effect, but the 'decoupled from mean free path' claim outruns the annealing evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.08932 v1 pith:GHL7O5FM submitted 2025-11-12 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Qiaochao Xiang , Xiaokang Li , Xiaodong Guo , Kamran Behnia , Zengwei Zhu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords phononthermalHalleffectstrontiumtitanateconductivitydisorderinternalstrainannealingmetalliccontacts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to settle whether the phonon thermal Hall effect is a genuine bulk property of insulators or an artifact of measurement. Using strontium titanate as a test bed, it shows that high-quality crystals show a thermal Hall angle up to 0.3% at 9 T, while disordered crystals show almost nothing. Air annealing partially restores the transverse signal while leaving the longitudinal thermal conductivity flat, so the effect's size is not controlled by the phonon mean free path. Identical results from metallic and insulating contacts rule out spurious contact signals. A sympathetic reader comes away with an intrinsic, disorder-sensitive phonon response that any correct theory must reproduce.

What carries the argument

The experimental lever is a set of controlled perturbations on the same material: four crystals with different intrinsic disorder, air annealing at 1000 °C to relieve internal strain, and simultaneous metallic/insulating contacts to probe spurious effects. The central observable is the thermal Hall angle ∇Ty/∇Tx, converted to κxy via κxy = (∇Ty/∇Tx)κxx. The load-bearing comparison is the annealing panel: κxx stays flat while κxy recovers, decoupling the transverse response from the phonon mean free path.

What would settle it

Measure strain (e.g., via x-ray diffraction peak widths or birefringence) and carrier density (e.g., via thermopower or optical spectra) on the same disordered SrTiO3 sample before and after the 24-hour air anneal; if the restored κxy appears while strain maps are unchanged, or if carrier density changes track the restoration, the strain-relief interpretation is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that the phonon thermal Hall effect in SrTiO3 is an intrinsic property of an ideal crystal lattice. The evidence is a three-part correlation: thermal-Hall amplitude tracks crystal quality rather than mean free path; annealing disordered crystals restores κxy even though κxx is unchanged; and the transverse signal is identical with metallic and insulating contacts. The authors conclude that disorder and internal strain are potent suppressors, that the amplitude is decoupled from phonon scattering, and that parasitic effects cannot be the origin.

Load-bearing premise

That air annealing relieves internal strain without meaningfully changing oxygen-vacancy or carrier content—the paper never measures strain or carrier density, and if annealing alters carriers, the restored signal could have a different origin.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Future thermal Hall experiments on insulators should characterize crystal quality (κxx peak height) before interpreting absent signals; below a sharp κxx peak the effect may simply be suppressed.
  • Any microscopic theory of the phonon thermal Hall effect must predict a signal that survives in a perfect lattice but is strongly reduced by static disorder or strain, and that is independent of the overall phonon mean free path.
  • The measured κxy in clean SrTiO3 is a bulk lattice response, so contact-based corrections are not needed to explain it in the regime studied.
  • Air annealing is a practical recipe for restoring the intrinsic thermal Hall response in disordered SrTiO3 without adding charge carriers, unlike vacuum annealing.
  • The decoupling between κxy and κxx implies that the transverse response cannot be modeled simply as an extrinsic scattering correction proportional to the phonon scattering rate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The domain-cancellation analogy (random strain domains canceling the signal) implies a size effect: samples whose strain domains are larger than the phonon mean free path might show stronger κxy; this can be tested by comparing crystals with different domain sizes.
  • If the decoupling is general, then the spread of reported phonon thermal Hall magnitudes in other insulators may be dominated by uncharacterized strain and defect distributions, making κxx alone an insufficient sample-quality metric.
  • A controlled bending or epitaxial-strain experiment on SrTiO3 could directly test whether strain suppresses κxy while leaving κxx flat, turning the paper's annealing inference into a mechanistic proof.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a systematic thermal Hall study of insulating SrTiO3 single crystals. Four crystals with different disorder levels are compared: high-κxx samples show a clear phonon thermal Hall signal (Hall angle up to 0.3% at 9 T), while low-κxx samples show essentially no signal. Air annealing of the disordered samples partially restores the thermal Hall signal without notably changing κxx. Measurements with metallic silver-paste contacts and insulating grease contacts on the same sample give indistinguishable transverse signals. The authors conclude that the phonon thermal Hall effect is intrinsic to the ideal lattice, that its amplitude is decoupled from the phonon mean free path, that disorder and internal strain are the dominant suppressors, and that metallic-contact artifacts are ruled out.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, the paper makes an important contribution to the phonon thermal Hall debate: it identifies sample quality and internal strain as controlled experimental variables, which could explain the long-standing sample-to-sample irreproducibility and provide a sharp guide for theory. The experimental strengths are the multi-sample comparison, the annealing protocol, the use of two independent contact types on the same sample, and the raw field-dependent Hall-angle data. However, the paper's strongest conclusions go beyond what the present measurements can establish: the annealing result is interpreted as strain relief without any direct strain or carrier-density probe, and the 'definitive' exclusion of parasitic signals is based on a single sample at two temperatures. The empirical correlations are valuable and likely correct, but the decoupling claim and the intrinsic-lattice claim require additional supporting measurements.

major comments (3)
  1. [Annealing Dependence (Figs. 2a–d; Eq. S2)] The central claim that annealing restores κxy without changing the phonon mean free path rests on the assumption that 1000 °C air annealing relieves internal strain without altering oxygen-vacancy/charge-carrier content. This is not measured. The flat κxx does not constrain carrier or dilute-defect content, because κxx is phonon-dominated. A carrier-mediated phonon-drag contribution (ref. 44) or a change in resonant scatterers (ref. 30) could also produce a restored κxy with little κxx change. Without direct strain and carrier-density data (e.g., dielectric loss, Hall carrier density, or an O2-annealing control), the 'decoupling from mean free path' and 'internal strain' conclusions are underdetermined. The stress-test concern therefore lands on a load-bearing point.
  2. [Figs. 1b, 2b–d, and Fig. S1; Eq. (S2)] No error bars or uncertainty estimates are shown for the thermal Hall angles or for κxy. The distinction between 'virtually absent' (≤0.02% at 9 T in Sample #2) and 'recovered' (~0.1%) depends on the noise floor and on systematic uncertainties in the thermocouple geometry and calibration. Propagating these uncertainties through Eq. (S2) is essential to assess whether the annealing recovery and the contact comparison are statistically significant. As written, the reported differences could be affected by contact-position or baseline-offset effects, particularly at the 0.02% level.
  3. [Contact Geometry (Figs. 3c–d)] The phrase 'definitively rules out parasitic signals' is stronger than the evidence supports. The contact comparison is performed on one sample at two temperature points (28.4 K and 64.0 K) with one contact geometry. The authors themselves acknowledge that metallic-contact effects may become non-negligible for very small Hall angles or high sample resistance. A single demonstration on a high-quality sample with a relatively large signal does not exclude contact artifacts in all regimes where the phonon THE is measured. Either soften the conclusion or provide additional tests, such as varying the contact size/geometry, measuring a poor-thermal-contact configuration, or comparing with the 'bypass-suppressed' setup proposed in ref. 40.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Fig. S1] The abstract states the effect is 'virtually absent' in disordered samples; the quantitative limit (≤0.02% at 9 T) should appear in the main text, not only in the supplementary figure caption, so readers can gauge the detection threshold.
  2. [Results: Sample Dependence] The term 'internal-strain mosaic domains' is introduced as a speculation. It should be explicitly labeled as a hypothesis, not a conclusion, and the supportive analogy to NiPS3 should be presented as a suggestion rather than evidence.
  3. [Methods] Typo: 'alimented' should be 'powered' or 'supplied'. Also, the information on thermocouple attachment, contact size, and thermal radiation shielding would help reproducibility.
  4. [References] Reference 21 gives a DOI '10.1103/r572-5dfm' that appears to be a placeholder or malformed; it should be corrected.
  5. [Figs. 1–3] The figures lack error bars and, in some panels, clear axis labels for the Hall angle (e.g., the units are given as ratios but the scaling is not defined). Adding a scale bar or explicit numeric ticks would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: anneal/contact/channel comparisons are controlled interventions, not definitions.

full rationale

This is an experimental parameter study. The quantities used—κxx(T), κxy(T), ∇Ty/∇Tx, annealing duration/atmosphere, and contact material—are independently defined and measured; κxy is computed from measured gradients and independently measured κxx via Eq. (S2), so the transverse response is not constructed from the longitudinal signal or fitted to any model. The central decoupling claim rests on a controlled intervention: after air annealing, κxy recovers while κxx stays flat (Figs. 2a–b,d), an observed empirical pattern rather than an identity. The contact comparison is a direct A/B measurement. Self-citations (refs. 9, 20, 44) are used as background/context or to justify avoiding vacuum annealing; the NiPS3 twinning analogy is illustrative, not load-bearing. The main weakness—that internal strain is inferred from annealing response rather than measured—is an underdetermination/interpretation issue, not a circular reduction; the paper itself acknowledges the regime where metallic contact parasitics could revive (small angles <0.02%), but this caveat does not make the present equal-signal observation circular. No fitted parameter, definitional identity, or self-citation chain reproduces the target conclusion, so there is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's central claims rely on domain assumptions about κxx as a disorder proxy, unverified strain relief by air annealing, and the absence of contact/thermoelectric artifacts. There are no theoretical free parameters in the usual sense, but the 25 W/(K·m) threshold is an ad hoc descriptive boundary. No new microscopic entities with independent evidence are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • κxx peak threshold for strain-mosaic cancellation = ≈25 W/(K·m)
    Introduced in the Discussion as 'evident in our data' to separate disordered samples where strain mosaics are proposed to cancel the THE. It is a hand-picked descriptive boundary, not fitted to a prediction, but it is chosen from the same dataset.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The peak value of longitudinal thermal conductivity κxx is a valid direct measure of disorder and phonon mean free path.
    Used to classify samples #1–#4; κxx can also be affected by strain, surface scattering, and impurity type, so this is a simplification.
  • domain assumption Air annealing at 1000 °C relieves internal strain while leaving oxygen-vacancy and charge-carrier content essentially unchanged.
    Load-bearing for the decoupling conclusion; vacuum annealing is avoided for this reason, but strain and carrier density are not directly measured.
  • domain assumption The measured transverse temperature gradient is a bulk thermal gradient with no thermoelectric or contact contribution.
    Used for all κxy values; the contact-parity test supports this on one sample but does not prove it universally.
  • domain assumption In-plane thermal conductivity is isotropic (κxx = κyy).
    Explicitly stated in SI S1 for the κxy calculation; anisotropy would require a modified analysis.
invented entities (1)
  • Randomly oriented internal-strain mosaic domains
    purpose: Proposed mechanism to explain why air annealing recovers the THE without restoring κxx: strain-induced domains cancel the transverse phonon response, analogous to magnetic domains in a ferromagnet.
    No direct imaging or independent measurement of such domains is provided; the analogy to NiPS3 twinning is from prior work, not demonstrated here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phonon Thermal Hall Effect: The Roles of Disorder, Annealing, and Metallic Contacts." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GHL7O5FM

@misc{pith2026251108932,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phonon Thermal Hall Effect: The Roles of Disorder, Annealing, and Metallic Contacts},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GHL7O5FM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.08932}
}
abstract

The phonon thermal Hall effect (THE) is a ubiquitous yet poorly understood phenomenon in insulators. Its microscopic origin remains debated, partly due to significant sample-dependent variations that hint at uncontrolled experimental parameters. Using SrTiO$_3$ as a model system, we identify disorder and uncontrolled strain as suppressors of a thermal Hall signal. Crystals with high thermal conductivity exhibit a substantial thermal Hall angle $\nabla T_y / \nabla T_x$ (up to 0.3\% at 9 T), whereas the effect is virtually absent in disordered samples. Crucially, annealing (in air atmosphere) these disordered samples partially restores the THE (approximately 0.1\% at 9 T) with little effect on the longitudinal thermal conductivity. This decoupling reveals that the amplitude of THE is not simply set by the phonon mean free path. Furthermore, measurements performed with metallic and insulating contacts yield identical results on the same sample. This definitively rules out parasitic signals as the effect's origin. Our work, by establishing the phonon THE as an intrinsic property of the crystal lattice and extremely sensitive to disorder, sharply constrains theoretical scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.08932 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sample dependence of thermal transport in SrTiO3. (a) Temperature-dependent longitudinal thermal conductivity (κxx) for samples #1–#4. While the curves converge at 300 K, they diverge at lower temperatures, indicating varying levels of disorder. (b) Field dependence of the thermal Hall angle (∇Ty/∇Tx) at T ≈ 29 K. A strong contrast is observed between the substantial signals in high-quality samples (#1, #4) and the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Recovery of the thermal Hall effect by annealing in disordered SrTiO3. (a) Temperature dependent longitudinal thermal conductivity (κxx(T)) of sample #2 before and after annealing, showing no significant recovery. (b) In stark contrast, the field-dependent thermal Hall angle (∇Ty/∇Tx), negligible in the unannealed state, emerges clearly after annealing. (c) Schematic of the four-thermocouple measurement geometry. (d… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Validation of contact-independent thermal Hall measurements. (a) Temperature dependent longitudinal thermal conductivity (κxx(T)) measured using metallic (silver paste) and insulating (grease) contacts; the overlapping curves confirm identical longitudinal responses. Inset: contact configuration schematic. (b) Schematic of two pairs of transverse contacts of thermal Hall measurements. (c, d) The field dependent ther… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Strohm, C., Rikken, G. L. J. A. & Wyder, P. Phenomenological evidence for the phonon Hall effect.Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 155901, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.155901 (2005). 2.Onose, Y .et al.Observation of the magnon Hall effect.Science329, 297–299, DOI: 10.1126/science.1188260 (2010)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.155901 2005

  2. [3]

    W., Cava, R

    Hirschberger, M., Krizan, J. W., Cava, R. J. & Ong, N. P. Large thermal Hall conductivity of neutral spin excitations in a frustrated quantum magnet.Science348, 106–109, DOI: 10.1126/science.1257340 (2015)

    doi:10.1126/science.1257340 2015

  3. [4]

    Watanabe, D.et al.Emergence of nontrivial magnetic excitations in a spin-liquid state of kagomé volborthite.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.113, 8653–8657, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524076113 (2016)

    doi:10.1073/pnas.1524076113 2016

  4. [5]

    Sugii, K.et al.Thermal Hall effect in a phonon-glass Ba3CuSb2O9.Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 145902, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.118.145902 (2017)

    2017

  5. [6]

    Kasahara, Y .et al.Majorana quantization and half-integer thermal quantum Hall effect in a Kitaev spin liquid.Nature559, 227–231, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0274-0 (2018)

    doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0274-0 2018

  6. [7]

    Grissonnanche, G.et al.Giant thermal Hall conductivity in the pseudogap phase of cuprate superconductors.Nature571, 376–380, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1375-0 (2019). 3/9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1375-0 2019

  7. [8]

    & Tanaka, H

    Yamashita, M., Gouchi, J., Uwatoko, Y ., Kurita, N. & Tanaka, H. Sample dependence of half-integer quantized thermal Hall effect in the Kitaev spin-liquid candidate α−RuCl3.Phys. Rev. B102, 220404, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.220404 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.220404 2020

  8. [9]

    & Behnia, K

    Li, X., Fauqué, B., Zhu, Z. & Behnia, K. Phonon thermal Hall effect in strontium titanate.Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 105901, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.105901 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.105901 2020

Show all 47 references
  1. [10]

    Phys.16, 1108–1111, DOI: 10.1038/ s41567-020-0965-y (2020)

    Grissonnanche, G.et al.Chiral phonons in the pseudogap phase of cuprates.Nat. Phys.16, 1108–1111, DOI: 10.1038/ s41567-020-0965-y (2020)

    2020

  2. [11]

    Boulanger, M.-E.et al.Thermal Hall conductivity in the cuprate Mott insulators Nd 2CuO4 and Sr2CuO2Cl2.Nat. Commun. 11, 1–9, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18881-z (2020)

    2020 doi

  3. [12]

    Sim, S.et al.Sizable suppression of thermal Hall effect upon isotopic substitution in SrTiO 3.Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 015901, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.015901 (2021)

    2021 doi

  4. [13]

    & Taillefer, L

    Chen, L., Boulanger, M.-E., Wang, Z.-C., Tafti, F. & Taillefer, L. Large phonon thermal Hall conductivity in the antiferromagnetic insulator Cu3TeO6.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.119, e2208016119, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2208016119 (2022)

    2022 doi

  5. [14]

    & Machida, Y

    Uehara, T., Ohtsuki, T., Udagawa, M., Nakatsuji, S. & Machida, Y . Phonon thermal Hall effect in a metallic spin ice.Nat. Commun.13, 1–8, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32375-0 (2022)

    2022 doi

  6. [15]

    Commun.14, 1027, DOI: 10.1038/ s41467-023-36750-3 (2023)

    Li, X.et al.The phonon thermal Hall angle in black phosphorus.Nat. Commun.14, 1027, DOI: 10.1038/ s41467-023-36750-3 (2023)

    2023

  7. [16]

    Chen, L.et al.Planar thermal Hall effect from phonons in cuprates.Phys. Rev. X14, 041011, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.14. 041011 (2024)

    2024 doi

  8. [17]

    Commun.15, 3513, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47858-5 (2024)

    Chen, L.et al.Planar thermal Hall effect from phonons in a Kitaev candidate material.Nat. Commun.15, 3513, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47858-5 (2024)

    2024 doi

  9. [18]

    Phys.20, 585–588, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-024-02384-5 (2024)

    Ataei, A.et al.Phonon chirality from impurity scattering in the antiferromagnetic phase of Sr 2IrO4.Nat. Phys.20, 585–588, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-024-02384-5 (2024)

    2024 doi

  10. [19]

    & Lorenz, T

    Sharma, R., Bagchi, M., Wang, Y ., Ando, Y . & Lorenz, T. Phonon thermal Hall effect in charge-compensated topological insulators.Phys. Rev. B109, 104304, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.104304 (2024)

    2024 doi

  11. [20]

    Meng, Q.et al.Thermodynamic origin of the phonon Hall effect in a honeycomb antiferromagnet.arXiv e-printsDOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.13306 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  12. [21]

    B.et al.Discovery of universal phonon thermal Hall effect in crystals.Phys

    Jin, X. B.et al.Discovery of universal phonon thermal Hall effect in crystals.Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 196302, DOI: 10.1103/r572-5dfm (2025)

    2025 doi

  13. [22]

    & Behnia, K

    Li, X., Guo, X., Zhu, Z. & Behnia, K. Angle-dependent planar thermal Hall effect by quasi-ballistic phonons in black phosphorus.Sci. Bull.70, 1962–1967, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2025.03.052 (2025)

    1962 doi

  14. [23]

    Sheng, L., Sheng, D. N. & Ting, C. S. Theory of the phonon Hall effect in paramagnetic dielectrics.Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 155901, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.155901 (2006)

    2006 doi

  15. [24]

    & Maksimov, L

    Kagan, Y . & Maksimov, L. A. Anomalous Hall effect for the phonon heat conductivity in paramagnetic dielectrics.Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 145902, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.145902 (2008)

    2008 doi

  16. [25]

    Zhang, L., Ren, J., Wang, J.-S. & Li, B. Topological nature of the phonon Hall effect.Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 225901, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.225901 (2010)

    2010 doi

  17. [26]

    & Shi, J

    Qin, T., Zhou, J. & Shi, J. Berry curvature and the phonon Hall effect.Phys. Rev. B86, 104305, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB. 86.104305 (2012)

    2012 doi

  18. [27]

    K., Zhang, L., Wang, J.-S

    Agarwalla, B. K., Zhang, L., Wang, J.-S. & Li, B. Phonon Hall effect in ionic crystals in the presence of static magnetic field.The Eur. Phys. J. B81, 197–202, DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2011-11002-x (2011)

    2011 doi

  19. [28]

    Chen, J.-Y ., Kivelson, S. A. & Sun, X.-Q. Enhanced thermal Hall effect in nearly ferroelectric insulators.Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 167601, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.167601 (2020)

    2020 doi

  20. [29]

    & Zhang, F.-C

    Yang, Y .-F., Zhang, G.-M. & Zhang, F.-C. Universal behavior of the thermal Hall conductivity.Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 186602, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.186602 (2020)

    2020 doi

  21. [30]

    & Kivelson, S

    Sun, X.-Q., Chen, J.-Y . & Kivelson, S. A. Large extrinsic phonon thermal Hall effect from resonant scattering.Phys. Rev. B106, 144111, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.144111 (2022). 4/9

    2022 doi

  22. [31]

    Perkins, N. B. Resolving the Achilles’ Heel of thermal Hall Conductivity Measurements.Physics15, 198, DOI: 10.1103/Physics.15.198 (2022)

    2022 doi

  23. [32]

    & MacDonald, A

    Flebus, B. & MacDonald, A. H. Charged defects and phonon Hall effects in ionic crystals.Phys. Rev. B105, L220301, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L220301 (2022)

    2022 doi

  24. [33]

    & Savary, L

    Mangeolle, L., Balents, L. & Savary, L. Phonon thermal Hall conductivity from scattering with collective fluctuations. Phys. Rev. X12, 041031, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.12.041031 (2022)

    2022 doi

  25. [34]

    Guo, H., Joshi, D. G. & Sachdev, S. Resonant thermal Hall effect of phonons coupled to dynamical defects.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.119, e2215141119, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2215141119 (2022)

    2022 doi

  26. [35]

    Phonon thermal Hall as a lattice Aharonov-Bohm effect.SciPost Phys

    Behnia, K. Phonon thermal Hall as a lattice Aharonov-Bohm effect.SciPost Phys. Core8, 061, DOI: 10.21468/ SciPostPhysCore.8.3.061 (2025)

    2025

  27. [36]

    & Niu, Q

    Zhang, L. & Niu, Q. Chiral phonons at high-symmetry points in monolayer hexagonal lattices.Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 115502, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.115502 (2015)

    2015 doi

  28. [37]

    & Ramshaw, B

    Shragai, A., Horsley, E., Kim, S., Kim, Y .-J. & Ramshaw, B. J. Phonon Hall viscosity and the intrinsic thermal Hall effect ofα-RuCl 3 (2025). arXiv:2510.06443

    2025 arXiv

  29. [38]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21403(2025)

    Hu, J.et al.High-resolution measurements of thermal conductivity matrix and search for thermal Hall effect in La 2CuO4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21403(2025)

    2025 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Jiang, S.et al.Comment on ‘High-resolution measurements of thermal conductivity matrix and search for thermal Hall effect in La2CuO4’.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.14105(2025)

    2025

  31. [40]

    & Shi, J

    Ma, H., Hu, X. & Shi, J. Metallic contact contributions in thermal Hall conductivity measurements.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.11240(2025)

    2025

  32. [41]

    & Stamenov, P

    Coey, J., Venkatesan, M. & Stamenov, P. Surface magnetism of strontium titanate.J. Physics: Condens. Matter28, 485001, DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/28/48/485001 (2016)

    2016 doi

  33. [42]

    L., Continentino, M., Baggio-Saitovitch, E

    Martelli, V ., Jiménez, J. L., Continentino, M., Baggio-Saitovitch, E. & Behnia, K. Thermal transport and phonon hydrodynamics in strontium titanate.Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 125901, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.125901 (2018)

    2018 doi

  34. [43]

    & Dogan, F

    Trinh, H., Devoe, A. & Dogan, F. Effects of yttrium and barium trace impurities on the dielectric properties of SrTiO3 (111) single crystals at cryogenic temperatures.J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.36, 1992, DOI: 10.1007/s10854-025-15957-8 (2025)

    1992 doi

  35. [44]

    & Behnia, K

    Jiang, S., Li, X., Fauqué, B. & Behnia, K. Phonon drag thermal Hall effect in metallic strontium titanate.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.119, e2201975119, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2201975119 (2022)

    2022 doi

  36. [45]

    Commun.15, 6921, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51268-y (2024)

    Meng, Q.et al.Magnetostriction, piezomagnetism and domain nucleation in a kagome antiferromagnet.Nat. Commun.15, 6921, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51268-y (2024)

    2024 doi

  37. [46]

    Haeni, J.et al.Room-temperature ferroelectricity in strained SrTiO 3.Nature430, 758–761, DOI: 10.1038/nature02773 (2004)

    2004 doi

  38. [47]

    & Balbashov, A

    Nabokin, P., Souptel, D. & Balbashov, A. Floating zone growth of high-quality SrTiO3 single crystals.J. crystal growth 250, 397–404, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(02)02391-6 (2003)

    2003 doi

  39. [48]

    Hanzig, J.et al.Single crystal strontium titanate surface and bulk modifications due to vacuum annealing.J. Appl. Phys. 110, DOI: 10.1063/1.3638692 (2011). Acknowledgements This work was supported by The National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2023YFA...

    2011 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.