Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 104 references

Experimentally accessible measurement of irreversibility in stochastic systems by categorizing single-molecule displacements

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sorting single-molecule displacements into spatial classes gives a model-free, experimentally accessible lower bound on entropy production.

desk verdict A practical, model-free irreversibility estimator with a clean proof and a real single-molecule test; the finite-Δt caveat and parameter choices temper the landscape claim but don't sink the paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.09183 v2 pith:SIH4FUA3 submitted 2025-11-12 cond-mat.stat-mech q-bio.BMq-bio.QM

Alvaro Lanza , Inés Martínez-Martín , Rafael Tapia-Rojo , Stefano Bo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechq-bio.BMq-bio.QM MSC 82C3160J60 PACS 05.40.-a05.70.Ln
keywords irreversibilityentropyproductionLangevindynamicsdisplacementdistributionsKullback-Leiblerdivergencefluctuationtheoremsingle-moleculeforcespectroscopymagnetictweezers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

A stochastic system's dissipation is usually hidden behind forces and diffusion coefficients that are hard to measure. This paper argues that the irreversibility of an overdamped Langevin process can be read off directly from displacement statistics: record where a molecule starts and ends over a short interval, sort those displacements into a few classes defined by spatial boundaries, and compare each class's displacement distribution with its time-reversed counterpart. The resulting Kullback-Leibler divergence is shown to be a lower bound on average entropy production for stationary systems and in the short-time limit for time-dependent driving, and the bound tightens monotonically as more classes are added. The same logic, applied only to boundary-crossing counts, recovers the spatial profile of dissipation. The paper then applies the estimator to magnetic-tweezer unfolding and refolding of the protein talin R3, where it resolves that a mechanically stabilized mutant dissipates more when unfolding than when refolding—an asymmetry traced to an asymmetric free-energy landscape. A sympathetic reader would care because, if this works, it gives experimentalists a way to quantify thermodynamic cost from ordinary position traces, with no model of the energy landscape required.

What carries the argument

Equation (10): ΣΔt(Cn) = k_B ∑_{C∈Cn} ∫ dℓ q(ℓ,C) ln[q(ℓ,C)/q(−ℓ, C̃)]. It is the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the forward and time-reversed displacement statistics, where displacements are binned into classes defined by the initial and final positions relative to spatial boundaries (e.g., crossing a boundary left-to-right vs right-to-left, or staying in the bulk). This object does the work of converting raw position-time data into a number that tracks entropy production, and the same machinery yields the local dissipation profile via Eq. (14)-(15), counting only the probability fluxes across a boundary. The mathematical engine behind the bounds is the log-sum inequality: each coarse-

What would settle it

Take the low-barrier double-well system of Fig. 3 with r = ±20 pN/s, compute the exact average entropy production in each ramp, and evaluate ΣΔt(C4) at Δt = 5 ms and at several smaller Δt values. Extrapolate Σ to Δt → 0 and compare the extrapolated total with the true entropy production; if the extrapolated value differs systematically from the true value, or if the 5 ms measurement exceeds the true value (as the inset shows it can), then the finite-resolution protocol does not measure entropy production directly and any ranking of conditions would need a Δt-dependent correction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the mixed discrete-continuous Kullback-Leibler divergence ΣΔt(Cn) — defined by summing over displacement classes C the integral over displacement length ℓ of q(ℓ,C) ln[q(ℓ,C)/q(−ℓ, C̃)] — captures the irreversibility of an overdamped Langevin system at finite temporal resolution. Because q(ℓ,C) is the joint probability of observing a displacement ℓ that belongs to a specified spatial class, it can be estimated directly from experimental trajectories. The authors prove, via the log-sum inequality applied to the two coarse-graining steps (projecting paths onto their endpoints, then projecting endpoints onto ℓ and class), that for stationary systems ΣΔt(Cn) ≤ ⟨ΔS_tot⟩,

Load-bearing premise

Under time-dependent driving, the estimator treats displacements measured in two consecutive time windows as forward and reversed copies of the same process, an identification that is valid only in the limit of vanishing time step, so finite experimental resolution can make the measured irreversibility exceed the true entropy production.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any stationary overdamped Langevin system, the estimator requires no knowledge of forces, potentials, or diffusion coefficient, and its measured value never exceeds the true average entropy production.
  • Adding more displacement classes always tightens the lower bound, so experimentalists can trade off data volume against tightness of the inferred dissipation.
  • In time-dependent single-molecule experiments, the estimator's peaks in time coincide with the moments of unfolding and refolding transitions, and its cumulative value ranks pulling rates and protein variants by irreversibility.
  • The method provides a spatial map of dissipation: by scanning the boundary position, one obtains the local entropy production rate at each point of the reaction coordinate.
  • Because the estimate relies only on displacement statistics, it can be cross-checked against dissipated work measured from forward and reverse protocols without exponential reweighting.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bound is approximately tight for a given partition, the gap between Σ and true entropy could be used as a quantitative measure of how much information about dissipation lives in the path interior rather than the endpoints; in one-dimensional stationary systems the gap vanishes, so the estimator may also serve as a Markovianity probe in more complex settings.
  • The unfolding/refolding asymmetry of the mutant implies that the barrier lies closer to the folded basin; this suggests a practical route to infer transition-state positions from non-equilibrium cyclic experiments, applicable to other mechanosensitive proteins without free-energy reconstruction.
  • Scanning over the observation window Δt may reveal hidden fast timescales: if two different Δt values give different rankings among conditions, the system possesses relaxation processes between the two timescales, and the method could be used as a multi-scale probe.
  • One stress-test is to apply the estimator to systems with non-Markovian or active noise; the identification of time-reversed classes should break down, but the raw asymmetry of displacement distributions may still be a useful dimensionless index for comparing far-from-equilibrium activity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a coarse-grained irreversibility measure Σ_Δt(C_n) (Eq. (10)) based on the Kullback-Leibler divergence between displacement distributions categorized by initial/final side of spatial boundaries and their time reverses. It proves that for stationary overdamped Langevin systems Σ_Δt is a lower bound on average entropy production (Eq. (12)), that a hierarchy of refined partitions tightens the bound (Eq. (13)), and that in the short-time limit a conditional fluctuation theorem holds (Eq. (11)). For time-dependent protocols, the same estimator is shown to bound entropy production only as Δt→0 (Appendix A1b). The method is applied to magnetic-tweezer unfolding/refolding of talin R3 under force ramps, reporting that the mechanically stabilized mutant R3 IVVI is more irreversible upon unfolding than refolding, an asymmetry reproduced by simulations with an asymmetric double-well potential.

Significance. The stationary lower-bound theorem is clean and self-contained, and the hierarchy via the data-processing inequality is elegant. The estimator is genuinely model-free in that it does not require forces, the diffusion coefficient, or full trajectories; the paper demonstrates on an analytically solvable NESS that it outperforms a direct TUR bound. The inclusion of a nearest-neighbor DKL estimator with a public code repository and the cross-validation of the experimental trends with Crooks' fluctuation theorem (Fig. S13) are notable strengths. If the finite-Δt limitation for time-dependent protocols is properly controlled, the method could be a widely applicable tool for single-molecule and tracking experiments.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A1b, Eq. (A13); Section IV C] The generalized estimator for time-dependent protocols is proven to bound entropy production only in the Δt→0 limit. Section IV C uses Δt=5 ms, and Fig. 3(c) (low-barrier, r=±20 pN/s) shows the estimator exceeding ⟨ΔS_tot⟩. The comparison in Eq. (A13) contains a protocol-shift term O(r Δt^{3/2}) that is not controlled. This affects the central experimental inference of an unfolding/refolding asymmetry (Fig. 4d), because the artifact can be unevenly distributed between ramps. Since the simulations in Fig. 4(f,g) use the same estimator, their agreement with experiment does not by itself validate the asymmetry. The authors should provide a quantitative finite-Δt correction or error bound, or demonstrate that the reported asymmetry is insensitive to Δt and to the protocol-shift term estimated from the measured ramp rates.
  2. [SM-X, Section IV C] The boundary k is chosen separately for each ramp and condition by maximizing ΔΣ_tf (or ΔΣ^trans_tf). For a stationary system this is harmless because every k gives a lower bound; for time-dependent finite Δt, however, no such bound exists, and optimizing k can systematically inflate the estimate. Since different k values are used for unfolding and refolding (e.g., 24 nm vs 19 nm for R3 IVVI at ±10 pN/s), the selection procedure can bias the asymmetry the paper reports. A robustness check using a common, physically motivated k (e.g., the transition-state location) or a pre-registered selection rule independent of the measured asymmetry should be provided.
  3. [Section IV C, Figs. 4(d) and S13] The comparison between R3 WT and R3 IVVI total irreversibility uses different force windows (3–13 pN vs 4–20 pN) and different numbers of trajectories. The total entropy production over a ramp depends on the protocol range, so the estimator magnitude is not directly comparable across constructs without normalization. Although the Crooks cross-validation in Fig. S13 supports the overall trend, the paper should explicitly discuss whether the reported difference in ΔΣ_tf between WT and IVVI is partly a protocol-range effect rather than a purely molecular one.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section IV B / Fig. 3(c)] The text correctly states that for time-dependent driving the bound holds only as Δt→0, but the simulation curves in Fig. 3(c) are presented as dissipation rates without always repeating this caveat. Adding an explicit caveat in the figure caption and in the corresponding results text would help readers avoid over-interpreting the finite-Δt values.
  2. [SM-I, near Eq. (S9)] The sentence 'with P(x|x′) = P(x|x′) and P(˜x|xN)=P(x′|x)' contains an apparent typo; the first equality should presumably involve the time-marginalized propagator or a different symbol. Please correct.
  3. [Fig. S8 / Section IV C] The choice Δt=5 ms is motivated by simulations, but Fig. S8 shows that at Δt=5 ms the r=±5 pN/s points for R3 IVVI are quite close. The paper should explicitly address the uncertainty of the ranking at this timescale, especially since the main-text asymmetry claim rests on comparisons across rates.
  4. [Section III B] The time-reversal class mapping C→C̃ is used in Eq. (10) but is not formally defined in the main text until the footnote after Eq. (10). Please define it explicitly before the definition of Σ_Δt.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the entropy bound is proven from data-processing inequalities, and the experimental claims are externally cross-validated.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Equation (10) defines the displacement-class KL divergence, and Eq. (12) is proven in Appendix A by two coarse-graining steps, each justified by the log-sum inequality (Eqs. A7-A11). This does not assume the inequality it derives. Equation (11), the conditional fluctuation theorem, follows from the path-wise definition of entropy production in Eq. (B1), and its validity is restricted to the stated Δt→0 limit (Appendix A1b, 'For larger time intervals, the bound is not valid'), which is an explicit approximation caveat, not a circular import. The experimental analysis does choose the boundary k to maximize ΔΣ_tf (SM-X: 'we choose k such that ΔΣ_tf is maximized') and Δt=5 ms from Fig. S8, but these are data-dependent hyperparameter choices that could introduce bias, not reductions of the estimator to the measured asymmetry by construction. The asymmetric-potential simulation is presented as a consistency test ('recapitulates the experimental observation') whose parameters are fixed by independent equilibrium Bell-Evans measurements (SM-VI: barrier heights from Refs. [73,74] and asymmetry '3 times the distance to the barrier from the unfolded state'), so it is not a fitted reproduction of the same observable. The method is additionally cross-validated against Crooks' fluctuation theorem (Fig. S13), providing external support. Self-citations appear for experimental setup, equilibrium landscape parameters, and displacement-distribution precedents, but none of these is load-bearing for the proof of the entropy bound. No circular step exhibiting Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central estimator is a coarse-grained KL divergence, so the main mathematical axiom is the data-processing inequality; the physical content is carried by the overdamped Langevin/1D-reaction-coordinate assumptions and by the ad hoc choices of boundary placement and simulation landscape asymmetry.

free parameters (6)
  • Displacement boundary positions k = k=24/19 nm (R3 IVVI), 30/28 nm (R3 WT); k1=-0.1, k2=±5 µm (NESS)
    Chosen per condition to maximize Σ in experiments (SM-X) and for the NESS case study; this post-hoc optimization can inflate the reported irreversibility and affects cross-condition comparisons.
  • Displacement time window Δt = 5 ms (main); 2-20 ms explored
    Chosen to balance transition counts and short-time validity; the estimator's finite-Δt behavior depends on this choice and can exceed entropy production for fast time-dependent ramps.
  • Nearest-neighbor order z_C = min(N_C^{1/3}, N_\tilde{C}^{1/3}, 10)
    Empirical choice for KL estimation variance/bias tradeoff (SM-IV).
  • Asymmetric potential factor a = a=1/3 (unfolded side)
    Chosen by hand (SM-VI: 'we choose 3 times the distance') to make the unfolded well broader; this is not determined by the equilibrium fits and is the ingredient that reproduces the observed unfolding/refolding asymmetry.
  • Barrier heights ΔU_WT, ΔU_IVVI = 1.56 k_BT and 3.65 k_BT
    Set from prior equilibrium rates and Kramers scaling (SM-VI); not fitted to the irreversibility data but they control the magnitude of the simulation comparison.
  • Diffusion coefficient D (simulations) = 3000 nm^2/s
    Taken from Ref. [74] for both proteins; required for simulation dynamics, not for the estimator, but enters the comparison.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Overdamped Langevin dynamics with Gaussian white noise and FDT (Eq. 1)
    The entire theoretical framework and the definition of entropy production assume this dynamics; proteins are modeled as a 1D reaction coordinate.
  • domain assumption Displacement partition is such that time-reversed classes belong to the same partition (footnote 2)
    Eq. (10) needs q(-ℓ,\tilde C) to be a well-defined class in the same partition; not every partition satisfies this.
  • standard math For 1D stationary systems the path-entropy log-ratio depends only on endpoints (SM-I)
    This is derived in the SM from the 1D path integral; it justifies equality in Eq. (A1) and the finite-Δt fluctuation theorem for 1D stationary processes.
  • standard math The midpoint (Stratonovich) discretization of the Langevin path integral [88] is used to evaluate infinitesimal propagators (Eq. A20)
    Underlies the short-time entropy expressions Eqs. (A21)-(A22) and the conditional fluctuation theorem.
  • domain assumption Bell-Evans and Kramers kinetics relate equilibrium force-dependent rates to barrier positions/heights (SM-VI)
    Used to set simulation barrier heights and to interpret the protein landscape asymmetry; these are approximations for the protein folding landscape.
  • domain assumption Instrumental noise is Gaussian with σ=3 nm, estimated from two fixed beads (SM-XII)
    Used in simulations to mimic experiments; if the true noise is non-Gaussian or position-dependent, the estimator bias estimates change.
  • standard math KL divergence data-processing inequality (log-sum inequality) [66]
    Core of the lower-bound proof in Appendix A; standard information-theoretic result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Experimentally accessible measurement of irreversibility in stochastic systems by categorizing single-molecule displacements." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SIH4FUA3

@misc{pith2026251109183,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Experimentally accessible measurement of irreversibility in stochastic systems by categorizing single-molecule displacements},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SIH4FUA3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.09183}
}
read the original abstract

Quantifying the irreversibility and dissipation of non-equilibrium processes is crucial to understanding their behavior, assessing their possible capabilities, and characterizing their efficiency. We introduce a physical quantity that quantifies the irreversibility of stochastic Langevin systems from the observation of individual molecules' displacements. Categorizing these displacements into a few groups based on their initial and final position allows us to measure irreversibility precisely without the need to know the forces and magnitude of the fluctuations acting on the system. For short times, our model-free estimate of irreversibility is related to entropy production by a conditional fluctuation theorem. For short times and in general for stationary protocols, our estimate provides a lower bound to the average entropy production. We validate the method on single-molecule force spectroscopy experiments of proteins subject to force ramps. We show that irreversibility is sensitive to detailed features of the energy landscape underlying the protein folding dynamics and suggest how our methods can be employed to unveil key properties of protein folding processes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.09183 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Illustration of displacements [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (d)] and on where we place the boundary k1 [see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Symmetric double-well potential with a high (∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Schematic of experimental magnetic tweezer setup. (b) Thin traces: example trajectories of the Talin R3 extension [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    For stationary systems, it is possible to directly com- pare our method to estimates made by the TUR using the same type of displacement statistics

    Relation to the thermodynamic uncertainty relation (TUR) for stationary systems. For stationary systems, it is possible to directly com- pare our method to estimates made by the TUR using the same type of displacement statistics. The TUR provides a lower bound to entropy production by considering the mean and fluctuations of a time-integrated current. The...

  2. [2]

    Peliti and S

    L. Peliti and S. Pigolotti,Stochastic thermodynamics: an introduction(Princeton University Press, 2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Seifert,Stochastic Thermodynamics(Cambridge University Press, 2025)

    U. Seifert,Stochastic Thermodynamics(Cambridge University Press, 2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    G. Lan, P. Sartori, S. Neumann, V. Sourjik, and Y. Tu, The energy–speed–accuracy trade-off in sensory adap- tation, Nature physics8, 422 (2012)

    2012

  5. [5]

    Skoge, S

    M. Skoge, S. Naqvi, Y. Meir, and N. S. Wingreen, Chem- ical sensing by nonequilibrium cooperative receptors, Physical Review Letters110, 248102 (2013)

    2013

  6. [6]

    Sartori, L

    P. Sartori, L. Granger, C. F. Lee, and J. M. Horowitz, Thermodynamic costs of information processing in sensory adaptation, PLoS computational biology10, e1003974 (2014)

    2014

  7. [7]

    C. C. Govern and P. R. ten Wolde, Energy dissipation and noise correlations in biochemical sensing, Physical review letters113, 258102 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    S. Bo, M. Del Giudice, and A. Celani, Thermodynamic limits to information harvesting by sensory systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experi- ment2015, P01014 (2015)

    2015

Show all 104 references
  1. [9]

    Mehta and D

    P. Mehta and D. J. Schwab, Energetic costs of cellular computation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109, 17978 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing er- rors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences71, 4135 (1974)

    1974

  3. [11]

    Murugan, D

    A. Murugan, D. A. Huse, and S. Leibler, Speed, dissipa- tion, and error in kinetic proofreading, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109, 12034 (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    Sartori and S

    P. Sartori and S. Pigolotti, Kinetic versus energetic dis- crimination in biological copying, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 188101 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    T. E. Ouldridge, C. C. Govern, and P. R. ten Wolde, Thermodynamics of computational copying in biochem- ical systems, Physical Review X7, 021004 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Sartori and S

    P. Sartori and S. Pigolotti, Thermodynamics of error correction, Physical Review X5, 041039 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    X. Yang, M. Heinemann, J. Howard, G. Huber, S. Iyer- Biswas, G. Le Treut, M. Lynch, K. L. Montooth, D. J. Needleman, S. Pigolotti,et al., Physical bioenerget- ics: Energy fluxes, budgets, and constraints in cells, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2026786118 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    A. I. Brown and D. A. Sivak, Theory of nonequilibrium free energy transduction by molecular machines, Chem- ical Reviews120, 434–459 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Pietzonka, A

    P. Pietzonka, A. C. Barato, and U. Seifert, Universal bound on the efficiency of molecular motors, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2016, 124004 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Gnesotto, F

    F. Gnesotto, F. Mura, J. Gladrow, and C. Broedersz, Broken detailed balance and non-equilibrium dynam- ics in living systems: A review, Reports on Progress in Physics81(2018)

    2018

  11. [19]

    A. C. Barato and U. Seifert, Thermodynamic uncer- tainty relation for biomolecular processes, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 158101 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    T. R. Gingrich, J. M. Horowitz, N. Perunov, and J. L. 13 England, Dissipation bounds all steady-state current fluctuations, Physical review letters116, 120601 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    N. Ohga, S. Ito, and A. Kolchinsky, Thermodynamic bound on the asymmetry of cross-correlations, Physical Review Letters131, 077101 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Santolin and G

    D. Santolin and G. Falasco, Dissipation bounds the co- herence of stochastic limit cycles, Physical Review Let- ters135, 057101 (2025)

    2025

  15. [23]

    Ptaszy´ nski and M

    K. Ptaszy´ nski and M. Esposito, Dissipation enables ro- bust extensive scaling of multipartite correlations, Phys- ical Review Letters135, 057401 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    W. J. Greenleaf, M. T. Woodside, and S. M. Block, High-resolution, single-molecule measurements of biomolecular motion, Annual Review of Biophysics 36, 171 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    M. C. Leake, The physics of life: one molecule at a time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences368, 20120248 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    A. S. Hansen, M. Woringer, J. B. Grimm, L. D. Lavis, R. Tjian, and X. Darzacq, Robust model-based analy- sis of single-particle tracking experiments with spot-on, eLife7, e33125 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Bustamante, Y

    C. Bustamante, Y. Chemla, S. Liu, and M. Wang, Op- tical tweezers in single-molecule biophysics, Nature Re- views Methods Primers1(2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    T. M. Muenker, G. Knotz, M. Kr¨ uger, and T. Betz, Ac- cessing activity and viscoelastic properties of artificial and living systems from passive measurement, Nature Materials23, 1283 (2024), publisher: Nature Publish- ing Group

    2024

  21. [29]

    Tapia-Rojo, M

    R. Tapia-Rojo, M. Mora, and S. Garcia-Manyes, Single- molecule magnetic tweezers to probe the equilibrium dy- namics of individual proteins at physiologically relevant forces and timescales, Nature Protocols19, 1779 (2024), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2024

  22. [30]

    Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Reports on Progress in Physics75, 126001 (2012)

    U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation the- orems and molecular machines, Reports on Progress in Physics75, 126001 (2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences, Physical Review Letters78, 2690 (1997)

    C. Jarzynski, Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences, Physical Review Letters78, 2690 (1997)

    1997

  24. [32]

    G. E. Crooks, Entropy production fluctuation theorem and the nonequilibrium work relation for free energy differences, Physical Review E60, 2721 (1999)

    1999

  25. [33]

    Seifert, Entropy production along a stochastic tra- jectory and an integral fluctuation theorem, Phys

    U. Seifert, Entropy production along a stochastic tra- jectory and an integral fluctuation theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 040602 (2005)

    2005

  26. [34]

    Battle, C

    C. Battle, C. P. Broedersz, N. Fakhri, V. F. Geyer, J. Howard, C. F. Schmidt, and F. C. MacKin- tosh, Broken detailed balance at mesoscopic scales in active biological systems, Science352, 604 (2016), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aac8167

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    I. A. Mart ´ ınez, G. Bisker, J. M. Horowitz, and J. M. Par- rondo, Inferring broken detailed balance in the absence of observable currents, Nature communications10, 3542 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Dechant and S.-i

    A. Dechant and S.-i. Sasa, Entropic bounds on currents in langevin systems, Phys. Rev. E97, 062101 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Koyuk and U

    T. Koyuk and U. Seifert, Thermodynamic uncertainty relation for time-dependent driving, Physical Review Letters125, 10.1103/physrevlett.125.260604 (2020)

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    S. K. Manikandan, D. Gupta, and S. Krishna- murthy, Inferring entropy production from short ex- periments, Physical Review Letters124, 10.1103/phys- revlett.124.120603 (2020)

    2020 doi

  31. [39]

    Van Vu, V

    T. Van Vu, V. T. Vo, and Y. Hasegawa, Entropy pro- duction estimation with optimal current, Phys. Rev. E 101, 042138 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Barral, P

    ´Edgar Rold´ an, J. Barral, P. Martin, J. M. R. Par- rondo, and F. J¨ ulicher, Quantifying entropy produc- tion in active fluctuations of the hair-cell bundle from time irreversibility and uncertainty relations (2021), arXiv:1803.04743 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Otsubo, S

    S. Otsubo, S. K. Manikandan, T. Sagawa, and S. Krish- namurthy, Estimating time-dependent entropy produc- tion from non-equilibrium trajectories, Communications Physics5, 10.1038/s42005-021-00787-x (2022)

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    Lee, D.-K

    S. Lee, D.-K. Kim, J.-M. Park, W. K. Kim, H. Park, and J. S. Lee, Multidimensional entropic bound: Estimator of entropy production for langevin dynamics with an arbitrary time-dependent protocol, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013194 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Di Terlizzi, M

    I. Di Terlizzi, M. Gironella, D. Herraez-Aguilar, T. Betz, F. Monroy, M. Baiesi, and F. Ritort, Variance sum rule for entropy production, Science383, 971–976 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Deg¨ unther, J

    J. Deg¨ unther, J. van der Meer, and U. Seifert, Gen- eral theory for localizing the where and when of en- tropy production meets single-molecule experiments, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, 10.1073/pnas.2405371121 (2024)

    2024 doi

  37. [45]

    Singh and K

    P. Singh and K. Proesmans, Inferring entropy produc- tion from time-dependent moments, Communications Physics7, 10.1038/s42005-024-01725-3 (2024)

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    P. E. Harunari, A. Dutta, M. Polettini, and E. Rold´ an, What to learn from a few visible transitions’ statistics?, Phys. Rev. X12, 041026 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Van der Meer, B

    J. Van der Meer, B. Ertel, and U. Seifert, Thermo- dynamic inference in partially accessible markov net- works: A unifying perspective from transition-based waiting time distributions, Physical Review X12, 031025 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Hyeon and W

    C. Hyeon and W. Hwang, Physical insight into the ther- modynamic uncertainty relation using Brownian mo- tion in tilted periodic potentials, Physical Review E96, 012156 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    Van Vu and Y

    T. Van Vu and Y. Hasegawa, Thermodynamic uncer- tainty relations under arbitrary control protocols, Phys- ical Review Research2, 013060 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Dieball and A

    C. Dieball and A. Godec, Direct Route to Ther- modynamic Uncertainty Relations and Their Satu- ration, Physical Review Letters130, 087101 (2023), arXiv:2208.06402 [cond-mat]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Chatzittofi, R

    M. Chatzittofi, R. Golestanian, and J. Agudo-Canalejo, Thermodynamic inference of correlations in nonequilib- rium collective dynamics, Physical Review Research6, L042012 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Di Terlizzi, Force-free kinetic inference of entropy pro- duction, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.07540 (2025)

    I. Di Terlizzi, Force-free kinetic inference of entropy pro- duction, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.07540 (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    Pietzonka, F

    P. Pietzonka, F. Ritort, and U. Seifert, Finite-time gen- eralization of the thermodynamic uncertainty relation, Phys. Rev. E96, 012101 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    Rold´ an and J

    E. Rold´ an and J. M. R. Parrondo, Estimating dissipa- tion from single stationary trajectories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 150607 (2010)

    2010

  47. [55]

    J. Li, J. M. Horowitz, T. R. Gingrich, and N. Fakhri, Quantifying dissipation using fluctuating currents, Na- ture Communications10, 10.1038/s41467-019-09631-x (2019). 14

    2019 doi

  48. [56]

    R. Bao, N. Ohga, and S. Ito, Measuring irreversibility by counting: a random coarse-graining framework (2025), arXiv:2508.11586 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2025

  49. [57]

    Gomez-Marin, J

    A. Gomez-Marin, J. M. R. Parrondo, and C. Van den Broeck, Lower bounds on dissipation upon coarse grain- ing, Phys. Rev. E78, 011107 (2008)

    2008

  50. [58]

    Gladrow, U

    J. Gladrow, U. F. Keyser, R. Adhikari, and J. Kap- pler, Experimental measurement of relative path prob- abilities and stochastic actions, Physical Review X11, 031022 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    Kappler and R

    J. Kappler and R. Adhikari, Stochastic action for tubes: Connecting path probabilities to measurement, Physical Review Research2, 023407 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    A. A. Hyman, C. A. Weber, and F. J¨ ulicher, Liquid- Liquid Phase Separation in Biology, Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology30, 39 (2014)

    2014

  53. [61]

    M. T. Woodside and S. M. Block, Reconstructing Fold- ing Energy Landscapes by Single-Molecule Force Spec- troscopy, Annual review of biophysics43, 19 (2014)

    2014

  54. [62]

    A. L. Thorneywork, J. Gladrow, Y. Qing, M. Rico- Pasto, F. Ritort, H. Bayley, A. B. Kolomeisky, and U. F. Keyser, Direct detection of molecular interme- diates from first-passage times, Science Advances6, eaaz4642 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    Sakamoto, T

    K. Sakamoto, T. Akimoto, M. Muramatsu, M. S. P. Sansom, R. Metzler, and E. Yamamoto, Heteroge- neous biological membranes regulate protein partition- ing via fluctuating diffusivity, PNAS Nexus2, pgad258 (2023), https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article- pdf/2/8/pgad258/51841...

    2023

  56. [64]

    A. G. Cherstvy, A. V. Chechkin, and R. Metzler, Parti- cle invasion, survival, and non-ergodicity in 2d diffusion processes with space-dependent diffusivity, Soft Matter 10, 1591 (2014)

    2014

  57. [65]

    D. T. McSwiggen, A. S. Hansen, S. S. Teves, H. Marie- Nelly, Y. Hao, A. B. Heckert, K. K. Umemoto, C. Dugast-Darzacq, R. Tjian, and X. Darzacq, Evidence for dna-mediated nuclear compartmentalization distinct from phase separation, eLife8, e47098 (2019)

    2019

  58. [66]

    S. Bo, L. Hubatsch, J. Bauermann, C. A. Weber, and F. J¨ ulicher, Stochastic dynamics of single molecules across phase boundaries, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 043150 (2021)

    2021

  59. [67]

    T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas,Elements of information theory(John Wiley & Sons, 2012)

    2012

  60. [68]

    M. Uhl, V. Weissmann, and U. Seifert, Propagator for a driven brownian particle in step potentials, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical54, 065002 (2021)

    2021

  61. [69]

    Neupane, A

    K. Neupane, A. P. Manuel, and M. T. Woodside, Protein folding trajectories can be described quantita- tively by one-dimensional diffusion over measured en- ergy landscapes, Nature Physics12, 700 (2016), pub- lisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2016

  62. [70]

    Kramers, Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions, Physica7, 284 (1940)

    H. Kramers, Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions, Physica7, 284 (1940)

    1940

  63. [71]

    J. A. Bonachela, H. Hinrichsen, and M. A. Mu˜ noz, En- tropy estimates of small data sets, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical41, 202001 (2008)

    2008

  64. [72]

    Q. Wang, S. R. Kulkarni, and S. Verdu, Divergence es- timation for multidimensional densities viak-nearest- neighbor distances, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory55, 2392 (2009)

    2009

  65. [73]

    B. T. Goult, T. Zacharchenko, N. Bate, R. Tsang, F. Hey, A. R. Gingras, P. R. Elliott, G. C. Roberts, C. Ballestrem, D. R. Critchley,et al., Riam and vin- culin binding to talin are mutually exclusive and regu- late adhesion assembly and turnover, Journal of Biolog- ical Chemi...

    2013

  66. [74]

    Tapia-Rojo, ´Alvaro Alonso-Caballero, and J

    R. Tapia-Rojo, ´Alvaro Alonso-Caballero, and J. M. Fern´ andez, Talin folding as the tuning fork of cellular mechanotransduction, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences117, 21346 (2020), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2004091117

    2020 doi

  67. [75]

    Tapia-Rojo, A

    R. Tapia-Rojo, A. Alonso-Caballero, C. L. Badilla, and J. M. Fernandez, Identical sequences, different behav- iors: Protein diversity captured at the single-molecule level, Biophysical Journal123, 814 (2024)

    2024

  68. [76]

    Manosas, A

    M. Manosas, A. Mossa, N. Forns, J. M. Huguet, and F. Ritort, Dynamic force spectroscopy of DNA hairpins: II. Irreversibility and dissipation, Journal of Statisti- cal Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2009, P02061 (2009)

    2009

  69. [77]

    Ragwitz and H

    M. Ragwitz and H. Kantz, Indispensable finite time corrections for fokker-planck equations from time series data, Physical Review Letters87, 254501 (2001)

    2001

  70. [78]

    D. S. Martin, M. B. Forstner, and J. A. K¨ as, Appar- ent subdiffusion inherent to single particle tracking, Bio- physical journal83, 2109 (2002)

    2002

  71. [79]

    Collin, F

    D. Collin, F. Ritort, C. Jarzynski, S. B. Smith, I. Tinoco, and C. Bustamante, Verification of the Crooks fluctuation theorem and recovery of RNA fold- ing free energies, Nature437, 231–234 (2005)

    2005

  72. [80]

    Rico-Pasto, A

    M. Rico-Pasto, A. Zaltron, S. J. Davis, S. Frutos, and F. Ritort, Molten globule–like transition state of protein barnase measured with calorimetric force spectroscopy, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2112382119 (2022)

    2022

  73. [81]

    Alemany and F

    A. Alemany and F. Ritort, Force-dependent folding and unfolding kinetics in DNA hairpins reveals transition- state displacements along a single pathway, The journal of physical chemistry letters8, 895 (2017)

    2017

  74. [82]

    J. Gore, F. Ritort, and C. Bustamante, Bias and error in estimates of equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences100, 12564 (2003)

    2003

  75. [83]

    Palassini and F

    M. Palassini and F. Ritort, Improving free-energy esti- mates from unidirectional work measurements: Theory and experiment, Physical Review Letters107, 060601 (2011)

    2011

  76. [84]

    Elosegui-Artola, R

    A. Elosegui-Artola, R. Oria, Y. Chen, A. Kosmalska, C. P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, N. Castro, C. Zhu, X. Trepat, and P. Roca-Cusachs, Mechanical regulation of a molecu- lar clutch defines force transmission and transduction in response to matrix rigidity, Nature cell biology18, 540 (2016)

    2016

  77. [85]

    S. Le, M. Yu, L. Hovan, Z. Zhao, J. Ervasti, and J. Yan, Dystrophin as a molecular shock absorber, ACS Nano 12, 12140 (2018), pMID: 30457830

    2018

  78. [86]

    Alvarez and B

    J. Alvarez and B. Hajek, Equivalence of trans paths in ion channels, Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics73, 046126 (2006)

    2006

  79. [87]

    A. M. Berezhkovskii, G. Hummer, and S. M. Bezrukov, Identity of distributions of direct uphill and downhill translocation times for particles traversing membrane channels, Physical Review Letters97, 020601 (2006). 15

    2006

  80. [88]

    Gladrow, M

    J. Gladrow, M. Ribezzi-Crivellari, F. Ritort, and U. F. Keyser, Experimental evidence of symmetry breaking of transition-path times, Nature Communications10, 10.1038/s41467-018-07873-9 (2019)

    2019 doi

  81. [89]

    A. W. C. Lau and T. C. Lubensky, State-dependent diffusion: Thermodynamic consistency and its path in- tegral formulation, Phys. Rev. E76, 011123 (2007)

    2007

  82. [90]

    Risken and T

    H. Risken and T. Frank,The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications, Springer Series in Synergetics (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1996)

    1996

  83. [91]

    GrandPre, G

    T. GrandPre, G. Teza, and W. Bialek, Direct es- timates of irreversibility from time series (2024), arXiv:2412.19772 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2024 arXiv

  84. [92]

    P´ erez-Cruz, Kullback-leibler divergence estimation of continuous distributions, 2008 IEEE International Sym- posium on Information Theory , 1666 (2008)

    F. P´ erez-Cruz, Kullback-leibler divergence estimation of continuous distributions, 2008 IEEE International Sym- posium on Information Theory , 1666 (2008)

    2008

  85. [93]

    Lanza and S

    A. Lanza and S. Bo, Nearest neighbours irreversibility estimator from displacement distributions,https:// github.com/bo-lab-kcl/IrreversibilityEstimator (2025)

    2025

  86. [94]

    Evans and K

    E. Evans and K. Ritchie, Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds, Biophysical journal72, 1541 (1997)

    1997

  87. [95]

    Hummer, From transition paths to transition states and rate coefficients, The Journal of Chemical Physics 120, 516 (2004)

    G. Hummer, From transition paths to transition states and rate coefficients, The Journal of Chemical Physics 120, 516 (2004)

    2004

  88. [96]

    Neupane, A

    K. Neupane, A. P. Manuel, J. Lambert, and M. T. Woodside, Transition-Path Probability as a Test of Reaction-Coordinate Quality Reveals DNA Hairpin Folding Is a One-Dimensional Diffusive Process, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters6, 1005 (2015)

    2015

  89. [97]

    D. A. Foster, R. Petrosyan, A. G. Pyo, A. Hoff- mann, F. Wang, and M. T. Woodside, Probing position- dependent diffusion in folding reactions using single- molecule force spectroscopy, Biophysical Journal114, 1657 (2018)

    2018

  90. [98]

    Blaber and D

    S. Blaber and D. A. Sivak, Optimal control in stochastic thermodynamics, Journal of Physics Communications 7, 033001 (2023)

    2023

  91. [99]

    C. H. Bennett, Efficient estimation of free energy differ- ences from monte carlo data, Journal of Computational Physics22, 245 (1976)

    1976

  92. [100]

    Alemany, M

    A. Alemany, M. Ribezzi, and F. Ritort, Recent progress in fluctuation theorems and free energy recovery, inAIP Conference Proceedings(AIP, 2011) p. 96–110

    2011

  93. [101]

    R. Tapia-Rojo, Chapter three - construction and opera- tion of high-resolution magnetic tape head tweezers for measuring single-protein dynamics under force, inMag- netic Tweezers for the Study of Protein Structure and Function, Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 694, edited by M. Ju...

    2024

  94. [102]

    N−1X i=0 − 1 4Ddt (∆xi −v i(¯xi)dt)2 − 1 2 ∇v(¯xi)dt # (S5) P( ex|x) = N−1Y i=0 P(˜xi+1|˜xi)∝exp

    Time-dependent systems We present here the generalization of our measure of irreversibility to time dependent systems, and discuss its relation to entropy production. We consider two types of time-dependent systems: systems subject to a time-constant force profile, relaxing to...

  95. [103]

    [44] As a point of comparison to our irreversibility estimator we take the method from Singh and Proesmans’ work [44], which is applicable as a bound to⟨∆S tot⟩(t)

    Method of Ref. [44] As a point of comparison to our irreversibility estimator we take the method from Singh and Proesmans’ work [44], which is applicable as a bound to⟨∆S tot⟩(t). The method has the advantage of not requiring extensive amount of data, since one only needs the ...

  96. [104]

    It is given by [31] p(W) p(−W R) = exp W−∆F kBT ,(S34) wherep(W) is the distribution of work done during the forward protocol andW R during the reverse

    Dissipated work via Crooks’ Fluctuation Theorem For a non-equilibrium process starting at equilibrium, Crooks’ Fluctuation Theorem is a reliable method for measur- ing equilibrium free energy differences ∆F, provided one has access to the reverse protocol, also starting at equ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.