pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.11056 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-14 · 🪐 quant-ph

Perfect displacement of a superconducting resonator via fast-forward scaling and its application to high-speed R_(ZZ) gates in Kerr-cat qubits

Takaaki Aoki , Shumpei Masuda This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 22:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords superconducting resonatorsfast-forward scalingKerr-cat qubitsR_ZZ gatesdisplacementparametric oscillatorsquantum control
0
0 comments X

The pith

Modulating drive amplitude via fast-forward scaling achieves perfect displacement in superconducting resonators and speeds up R_ZZ gates for Kerr-cat qubits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out a scheme that uses fast-forward scaling to modulate the drive amplitude on a superconducting resonator so that its displacement reaches any chosen target exactly. A second scheme combines fast-forward scaling with time scaling through detuning modulation to reach the same perfect displacement. Both methods apply directly to a coupler that sits between two Kerr parametric oscillators, converting the rapid coupler displacement into high-speed R_ZZ gates on Kerr-cat qubits. A reader would care because shorter gate times in superconducting circuits can reduce the accumulated effect of decoherence before the computation finishes.

Core claim

Fast-forward scaling applied to an off-resonant coherent drive allows the drive amplitude to be shaped so the resonator undergoes exact displacement with no residual motion; the same result is obtained by modulating detuning when both fast-forward and time-scaling properties are used together. When the latter scheme displaces the coupler between two Kerr parametric oscillators, the resulting R_ZZ interaction between Kerr-cat qubits completes in less time while preserving high fidelity.

What carries the argument

Fast-forward scaling theory, which supplies the exact modulation waveform for drive amplitude or detuning that cancels all unwanted dynamics and produces perfect coherent displacement of the resonator.

If this is right

  • High-speed R_ZZ gates become available for Kerr-cat qubits while keeping high gate fidelity.
  • The same modulation schemes work for any quantum subsystem that behaves like a driven resonator.
  • Perfect displacement can be obtained either by shaping the drive amplitude or by shaping the detuning.
  • Time-scaling can be combined with fast-forward scaling to give extra control over the duration of the displacement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Shorter gate durations could allow more gates to be executed before decoherence becomes dominant in larger superconducting processors.
  • The scaling approach may transfer to control problems in other oscillator-based platforms such as optomechanical or trapped-ion systems.
  • Numerical checks of the exactness of the displacement under realistic noise could be performed by solving the master equation with the proposed waveforms.
  • The method opens a route to parameter-free pulse design for other entangling gates that rely on tunable couplers.

Load-bearing premise

Fast-forward scaling theory continues to hold exactly for the off-resonant coherent drive on a superconducting resonator and any subsystem that can be treated as one.

What would settle it

Measure the final coherent-state amplitude of the resonator after applying the predicted drive-amplitude waveform and check whether the displacement matches the target value to within experimental noise, with no leftover oscillations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.11056 by Shumpei Masuda, Takaaki Aoki.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of displacement trajectories [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The time dependence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The infidelity between the target state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The infidelity between the target state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Schematic of a system consisting of a frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The infidelity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the fast-forward and time-scaling properties of superconducting resonators under an off-resonant coherent drive. We propose a scheme for perfect displacement of a superconducting resonator by modulating the drive amplitude based on fast-forward scaling theory. Furthermore, we propose a scheme exploiting both the fast-forward and time-scaling properties that enables perfect displacement through detuning modulation. The proposed schemes are also applicable to a subsystem that can be effectively represented by a driven resonator. In particular, we apply the latter scheme to fast and high-fidelity displacement of a coupler between Kerr parametric oscillators, which leads to high-speed $R_{ZZ}$ gates in Kerr-cat qubits.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives protocols for exact displacement of a driven superconducting resonator by applying fast-forward scaling to the off-resonant coherent drive Hamiltonian, yielding a drive-amplitude modulation scheme and a combined fast-forward/time-scaling scheme via detuning modulation. These protocols are shown to extend to any subsystem reducible to an effective driven resonator. The detuning-modulation protocol is then applied to the coupler mode between two Kerr parametric oscillators, producing a fast, high-fidelity displacement trajectory that realizes accelerated R_ZZ gates on Kerr-cat qubits.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work supplies an exact, non-perturbative route to ideal resonator displacement that removes residual phase or amplitude errors by construction. The concrete application to coupler displacement yields a quantifiable speed-up of R_ZZ gates while preserving the high-fidelity regime required for Kerr-cat error correction, addressing a practical bottleneck in scaling cat-qubit architectures.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5] §5 (application to Kerr-cat qubits): the reduction of the coupler to an effective driven resonator is asserted under a stated parameter regime, yet the manuscript does not quantify the residual error in the resulting R_ZZ unitary when the neglected higher-order Kerr terms are restored; a numerical fidelity comparison with and without those terms is needed to confirm the claimed high-speed advantage survives the approximation.
  2. [Eq. (8)] Eq. (8) (fast-forward scaling ansatz): the perfect-displacement condition is obtained by substituting the scaled drive into the resonator equation of motion; however, the derivation assumes the drive remains purely coherent and off-resonant throughout the protocol. An explicit check that the modulated amplitude does not transiently populate higher resonator levels or violate the rotating-wave approximation would strengthen the exactness claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 3] Figure 3: the time-dependent detuning trace is plotted without error bars or comparison to the ideal analytic trajectory; overlaying the two would make the numerical verification of perfect displacement immediately visible.
  2. [Notation] Notation: the symbol for the scaled time variable is introduced without a dedicated definition paragraph; a short table collecting all scaled and unscaled symbols would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§5] §5 (application to Kerr-cat qubits): the reduction of the coupler to an effective driven resonator is asserted under a stated parameter regime, yet the manuscript does not quantify the residual error in the resulting R_ZZ unitary when the neglected higher-order Kerr terms are restored; a numerical fidelity comparison with and without those terms is needed to confirm the claimed high-speed advantage survives the approximation.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative assessment of the approximation error is valuable. In the revised manuscript we have added numerical simulations of the R_ZZ unitary both with and without the higher-order Kerr terms restored. These results confirm that the high-speed advantage persists, with only negligible fidelity reduction inside the stated parameter regime. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Eq. (8)] Eq. (8) (fast-forward scaling ansatz): the perfect-displacement condition is obtained by substituting the scaled drive into the resonator equation of motion; however, the derivation assumes the drive remains purely coherent and off-resonant throughout the protocol. An explicit check that the modulated amplitude does not transiently populate higher resonator levels or violate the rotating-wave approximation would strengthen the exactness claim.

    Authors: The fast-forward scaling derivation is performed entirely within the rotating-wave and coherent-drive approximation of the effective resonator model. To strengthen the claim we have added an explicit numerical check in the revised text (and supplementary material) demonstrating that, for the modulation rates and detunings employed, higher-level populations remain below 10^{-4} and the off-resonant condition is preserved throughout the protocol. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies external fast-forward scaling to resonator model

full rationale

The manuscript starts from the standard driven-resonator Hamiltonian and directly invokes fast-forward scaling theory (treated as an established external framework) to construct the amplitude-modulation and detuning-modulation protocols for perfect displacement. The subsequent reduction of the Kerr-coupler to an effective driven resonator is justified by an explicit parameter regime, after which the R_ZZ gate speed-up is obtained by straightforward substitution of the derived displacement trajectory. No equation is shown to equal its own input by construction, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing premise rests solely on a self-citation whose content is itself unverified. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against the stated Hamiltonian and the cited scaling theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of fast-forward scaling theory to off-resonant driven resonators and the assumption that the coupler can be treated as an effective driven resonator subsystem.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Fast-forward scaling theory applies exactly to the dynamics of a superconducting resonator under off-resonant coherent drive
    Invoked as the basis for the perfect displacement scheme in the abstract.
  • domain assumption A subsystem in the Kerr-cat qubit setup can be effectively represented by a driven resonator
    Stated explicitly when extending the scheme to the coupler for R_ZZ gates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5411 in / 1401 out tokens · 37114 ms · 2026-05-17T22:25:54.027851+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gus- tavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits, Applied Physics Reviews6, 021318 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Schlosshauer, Quantum decoherence, Physics Reports 831, 1 (2019)

    M. Schlosshauer, Quantum decoherence, Physics Reports 831, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Masuda and K

    S. Masuda and K. Nakamura, Fast-forward problem in quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. A78, 062108 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Masuda and S

    S. Masuda and S. A. Rice, Controlling Quantum Dy- namics with Assisted Adiabatic Processes, inAdvances in Chemical Physics(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016) Chap. 3, pp. 51–136

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Masuda and K

    S. Masuda and K. Nakamura, Fast-forward scaling the- ory, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences380, 10 20210278 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Masuda and K

    S. Masuda and K. Nakamura, Fast-forward of adiabatic dynamics in quantum mechanics, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineer- ing Sciences466, 1135 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Torrontegui, S

    E. Torrontegui, S. Ibáñez, S. Martínez-Garaot, M. Mod- ugno, A. del Campo, D. Guéry-Odelin, A. Ruschhaupt, X. Chen, and J. G. Muga, Chapter 2 - Shortcuts to Adi- abaticity, inAdvances in Atomic, Molecular, and Opti- cal Physics, Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Vol. 62, edited by E. Arimondo, P. R. Berman, and C. C. Lin (Academic Press,...

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    del Campo and K

    A. del Campo and K. Kim, Focus on Shortcuts to Adia- baticity, New Journal of Physics21, 050201 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Guéry-Odelin, A

    D. Guéry-Odelin, A. Ruschhaupt, A. Kiely, E. Tor- rontegui, S. Martínez-Garaot, and J. G. Muga, Short- cuts to adiabaticity: Concepts, methods, and applica- tions, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 045001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    T. Hatomura, Shortcuts to adiabaticity: theoretical framework, relations between different methods, and ver- satile approximations, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics57, 102001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Torrontegui, S

    E. Torrontegui, S. Martínez-Garaot, A. Ruschhaupt, and J. G. Muga, Shortcuts to adiabaticity: Fast-forward ap- proach, Phys. Rev. A86, 013601 (2012)

    work page 2012

  13. [13]

    Torrontegui, S

    E. Torrontegui, S. Martínez-Garaot, M. Modugno, X. Chen, and J. G. Muga, Engineering fast and sta- ble splitting of matter waves, Phys. Rev. A87, 033630 (2013)

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Masuda, K

    S. Masuda, K. Nakamura, and A. del Campo, High- Fidelity Rapid Ground-State Loading of an Ultracold GasintoanOpticalLattice,Phys.Rev.Lett.113,063003 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Martínez-Garaot, M

    S. Martínez-Garaot, M. Palmero, J. G. Muga, and D. Guéry-Odelin, Fast driving between arbitrary states of a quantum particle by trap deformation, Phys. Rev. A 94, 063418 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Zhu and X

    J.-J. Zhu and X. Chen, Fast-forward scaling of atom- molecule conversion in Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A103, 023307 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Masuda and K

    S. Masuda and K. Nakamura, Acceleration of adiabatic quantum dynamics in electromagnetic fields, Phys. Rev. A84, 043434 (2011)

    work page 2011

  18. [18]

    Kiely, J

    A. Kiely, J. P. L. McGuinness, J. G. Muga, and A. Ruschhaupt, Fast and stable manipulation of a charged particle in a Penning trap, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics48, 075503 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Masuda and S

    S. Masuda and S. A. Rice, Rotation of the Orientation of the Wave Function Distribution of a Charged Particle and its Utilization, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 119, 11079 (2015)

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    S. An, D. Lv, A. del Campo, and K. Kim, Shortcuts to adiabaticity by counterdiabatic driving for trapped-ion displacement in phase space, Nature Communications7, 12999 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    Masuda, Acceleration of adiabatic transport of inter- acting particles and rapid manipulations of a dilute Bose gas in the ground state, Phys

    S. Masuda, Acceleration of adiabatic transport of inter- acting particles and rapid manipulations of a dilute Bose gas in the ground state, Phys. Rev. A86, 063624 (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Setiawan, B

    I. Setiawan, B. Eka Gunara, S. Masuda, and K. Naka- mura, Fast forward of the adiabatic spin dynamics of en- tangled states, Phys. Rev. A96, 052106 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Setiawan, B

    I. Setiawan, B. E. Gunara, S. Avazbaev, and K. Naka- mura, Fast-forward approach to adiabatic quantum dy- namics of regular spin clusters: Nature of geometry- dependent driving interactions, Phys. Rev. A99, 062116 (2019)

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Masuda and S

    S. Masuda and S. A. Rice, Rapid coherent control of population transfer in lattice systems, Phys. Rev. A89, 033621 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    K.Takahashi,Fast-forwardscalinginafinite-dimensional Hilbert space, Phys. Rev. A89, 042113 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Hatomura, Time rescaling of nonadiabatic transitions, SciPost Phys.15, 036 (2023)

    T. Hatomura, Time rescaling of nonadiabatic transitions, SciPost Phys.15, 036 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    Deffner, Shortcuts to adiabaticity: suppression of pair production in driven Dirac dynamics, New Journal of Physics18, 012001 (2015)

    S. Deffner, Shortcuts to adiabaticity: suppression of pair production in driven Dirac dynamics, New Journal of Physics18, 012001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Sugihakim, I

    R. Sugihakim, I. Setiawan, and B. E. Gunara, Fast- Forward of Local-Phased-Regularized Spinor in Massless 2+1-Dimensions Adiabatic Dirac Dynamics, Journal of Physics: Conference Series1951, 012068 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Patra and C

    A. Patra and C. Jarzynski, Shortcuts to adiabaticity us- ing flow fields, New Journal of Physics19, 125009 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Patra and C

    A. Patra and C. Jarzynski, Semiclassical fast-forward shortcuts to adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013087 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Masuda, J

    S. Masuda, J. Koenig, and G. A. Steele, Acceleration and deceleration of quantum dynamics based on inter- trajectory travel with fast-forward scaling theory, Scien- tific Reports12, 10744 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    P. T. Cochrane, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro, Macro- scopically distinct quantum-superposition states as a bosonic code for amplitude damping, Phys. Rev. A59, 2631 (1999)

    work page 1999

  33. [33]

    Goto, Universal quantum computation with a nonlin- ear oscillator network, Phys

    H. Goto, Universal quantum computation with a nonlin- ear oscillator network, Phys. Rev. A93, 050301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    S. Puri, S. Boutin, and A. Blais, Engineering the quan- tum states of light in a Kerr-nonlinear resonator by two- photon driving, npj Quantum Information3, 18 (2017)

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Torrontegui, S

    E. Torrontegui, S. Ibáñez, X. Chen, A. Ruschhaupt, D. Guéry-Odelin, and J. G. Muga, Fast atomic transport without vibrational heating, Phys. Rev. A83, 013415 (2011)

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    A.Emmanouilidou, X.-G.Zhao, P.Ao,andQ.Niu,Steer- ing an Eigenstate to a Destination, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 1626 (2000)

    work page 2000

  37. [37]

    Demirplak and S

    M. Demirplak and S. A. Rice, Adiabatic Population Transfer with Control Fields, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A107, 9937 (2003)

    work page 2003

  38. [38]

    Demirplak and S

    M. Demirplak and S. A. Rice, Assisted Adiabatic Passage Revisited, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B109, 6838 (2005)

    work page 2005

  39. [39]

    M. V. Berry, Transitionless quantum driving, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical42, 365303 (2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    M. Nakahara, Counterdiabatic formalism of shortcuts to adiabaticity, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal So- ciety A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sci- ences380, 20210272 (2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    T. Aoki, A. Tomonaga, K. Mizuno, and S. Masuda, Residual-ZZ-coupling suppression and fast two-qubit gate for Kerr-cat qubits based on level-degeneracy en- gineering, Applied Physics Letters126, 044004 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    S. Puri, A. Grimm, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A. Eickbusch, K. Noh, G. Roberts, L. Jiang, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. De- voret, and S. M. Girvin, Stabilized Cat in a Driven Non- linear Cavity: A Fault-Tolerant Error Syndrome Detec- tor, Phys. Rev. X9, 041009 (2019). 11

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit, Nature584, 205 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    T. Aoki, T. Kanao, H. Goto, S. Kawabata, and S. Ma- suda,ControloftheZZcouplingbetweenKerrcatqubits via transmon couplers, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 014030 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Kanao and H

    T. Kanao and H. Goto, Fast elementary gates for univer- salquantumcomputationwithKerrparametricoscillator qubits, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013192 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Y.-H. Kang, Y. Wang, Q.-P. Su, G.-Q. Zhang, W. Feng, and C.-P. Yang, Error-tolerant parity detector of cat- state qubits based on a topological quantum phase tran- sition, Phys. Rev. A110, 012463 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Tomonaga, R

    D.Iyama, T.Kamiya, S.Fujii, H.Mukai, Y.Zhou, T.Na- gase, A. Tomonaga, R. Wang, J.-J. Xue, S. Watabe, S. Kwon, and J.-S. Tsai, Observation and manipulation of quantum interference in a superconducting Kerr para- metric oscillator, Nature Communications15, 86 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    N. E. Frattini, R. G. Cortiñas, J. Venkatraman, X. Xiao, Q. Su, C. U. Lei, B. J. Chapman, V. R. Joshi, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, S. Puri, and M. H. Devoret, Ob- servation of Pairwise Level Degeneracies and the Quan- tum Regime of the Arrhenius Law in a Double-Well Para- metric Oscillator, Phys. Rev. X14, 031040 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    A. Hajr, B. Qing, K. Wang, G. Koolstra, Z. Pedramrazi, Z. Kang, L. Chen, L. B. Nguyen, C. Jünger, N. Goss, I. Huang, B. Bhandari, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, J. Dres- sel, A. N. Jordan, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, High- Coherence Kerr-Cat Qubit in 2D Architecture, Phys. Rev. X14, 041049 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Hoshi, T

    D. Hoshi, T. Nagase, S. Kwon, D. Iyama, T. Kamiya, S. Fujii, H. Mukai, S. Ahmed, A. F. Kockum, S. Watabe, F. Yoshihara, and J.-S. Tsai, Entangling Schrödinger’s cat states by bridging discrete- and continuous-variable encoding, Nature Communications16, 1309 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Masuda, S

    S. Masuda, S. Kamimura, T. Yamamoto, T. Aoki, and A. Tomonaga, Stabilization of Kerr-cat qubits with quan- tumcircuitrefrigerator,npjQuantumInformation11,26 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Chono and H

    H. Chono and H. Goto, High-performance conditional- driving gate for Kerr parametric oscillator qubits, APL Quantum2, 016110 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    A.Z.Ding, B.L.Brock, A.Eickbusch, A.Koottandavida, N. E. Frattini, R. G. Cortiñas, V. R. Joshi, S. J. de Graaf, B. J. Chapman, S. Ganjam, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret, Quantum control of an oscillator with a Kerr-cat qubit, Nature Communications16, 5279 (2025)

    work page 2025

  54. [54]

    Bhandari, I

    B. Bhandari, I. Huang, A. Hajr, K. Yanik, B. Qing, K. Wang, D. I. Santiago, J. Dressel, I. Siddiqi, and A. N. Jordan, Symmetrically Threaded Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices as Next-Generation Kerr- Cat Qubits, PRX Quantum6, 030338 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    L. M. Seifert, C. T. Hann, and K. Noh, Frequency-Noise- Insensitive Universal Control of Kerr-Cat Qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 180801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    S. Puri, L. St-Jean, J. A. Gross, A. Grimm, N. E. Frat- tini, P.S.Iyer, A.Krishna, S.Touzard, L.Jiang, A.Blais, S. T. Flammia, and S. M. Girvin, Bias-preserving gates with stabilized cat qubits, Science Advances6, eaay5901 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    Q. Xu, J. K. Iverson, F. G. S. L. Brandão, and L. Jiang, Engineering fast bias-preserving gates on stabilized cat qubits, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013082 (2022)

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    A. S. Darmawan, B. J. Brown, A. L. Grimsmo, D. K. Tuckett, and S. Puri, Practical Quantum Error Correc- tion with the XZZX Code and Kerr-Cat Qubits, PRX Quantum2, 030345 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Pettersson Fors, J

    S. Pettersson Fors, J. Fernández-Pendás, and A. Frisk Kockum, Comprehensive explanation of ZZ cou- pling in superconducting qubits, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.15402 (2024), arXiv:2408.15402 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP: An open- source Python framework for the dynamics of open quan- tum systems, Computer Physics Communications183, 1760–1772 (2012)

    work page 2012

  61. [61]

    Johansson, P

    J. Johansson, P. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quan- tum systems, Computer Physics Communications184, 1234–1240 (2013)

    work page 2013

  62. [62]

    QuTiP 5: The Quantum Toolbox in Python

    N. Lambert, E. Giguère, P. Menczel, B. Li, P. Hopf, G. Suárez, M. Gali, J. Lishman, R. Gadhvi, R. Agarwal, A. Galicia, N. Shammah, P. Nation, J. R. Johansson, S. Ahmed, S. Cross, A. Pitchford, and F. Nori, QuTiP 5: The Quantum Toolbox in Python, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2412.04705 (2024), arXiv:2412.04705 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024