Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 45 references

A wired uniform spanning tree's tripod — three branches meeting at a trifurcation — converges in the scaling limit to three-sided radial SLE_2, with an explicit density for the trifurcation point.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

In the scaling limit, the wired-UST tripod on a hexagonal lattice has an explicit trifurcation density and, conditional on the trifurcation, converges to three-sided radial SLE_2.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-03 challenge →

load-bearing objection First discrete realization of three-sided radial SLE, built on a genuinely new determinant observable; the only real caveat is that the final identification leans on an unreviewed preprint. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2511.11151 v2 pith:5BN7MTNX submitted 2025-11-14 math.PR

Tripod in uniform spanning tree and three-sided radial SLE$_2$

Jiacheng Ding , Mingchang Liu , Hao Wu This is my paper
classification math.PR MSC 60J67
keywords uniform spanning treewired boundary conditionsthree-sided radial SLE_2trifurcationtripod partition functionloop-erased random walkhexagonal latticeconformal field theory correlation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the tripod formed by three boundary branches of a wired uniform spanning tree on a fine hexagonal lattice converges, in the scaling limit, to a three-sided radial SLE_2: a triple of simple random curves joining three boundary points to a common interior point. The meeting point, called the trifurcation, is shown to have a law that is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure, with an explicit density built from Poisson kernels and the conformal radius. Conditional on the trifurcation, the three branches follow the three-sided radial SLE_2 law. The central step is a new discrete observable — a 3-by-3 determinant of Poisson kernels derived through a determinantal formula for loop-erased random walks — whose scaling limit equals the tripod partition function, which in turn coincides with the SLE_2 partition function. If correct, this is the first lattice realization of a multi-sided radial SLE, and it gives a probabilistic interpretation of a CFT correlation function with boundary conformal weights 1 and a bulk field of weights (1,1).

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 1.3: for bounded 3-polygons approximated by δ-scaled hexagonal lattices with wired boundary conditions, conditional on the event that the boundary branches from x1 and x2 both exit through x3, the trifurcation t^δ converges in distribution to a point t with density p(Ω;x1,x2,x3;z) = (4/(3π)) · P(z,x1)^2 P(z,x2)^2 P(z,x3)^2 / [CR(Ω;z)^2 (P(x1,x2)P(x2,x3)P(x3,x1))], and conditional on t, the tripod (γ1,γ2,γ3) follows the three-sided radial SLE_2 law. This density is the normalized tripod partition function Ztri, and the paper shows that the scaling limit of the discrete tripod observable coincides exactly with the partition function of three-sided radial SL

What carries the argument

The tripod partition function Ztri(Ω;x1,x2,x3;z), built from squared Poisson kernels and the conformal radius, is the object that carries the argument. Its discrete counterpart is a 3-by-3 determinant of Poisson kernels evaluated at the three neighbors of a candidate trifurcation vertex; the paper evaluates this determinant through a total-positivity determinantal formula for loop-erased random walks, using hexagonal-lattice geometry essentially. In the continuum, Ztri equals the three-sided radial SLE_2 partition function, and the conditional-marginal description of three-sided radial SLE_2 (γ3 as radial SLE_2(2,2), then γ1 as chordal SLE_2(2), then γ2 as chordal SLE_2) is what converts the

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the limit as three-sided radial SLE_2 rests on the imported claim that three-sided radial SLE_2 exists uniquely and is characterized by the conditional-marginal description in Definition 1.2; if that uniqueness or the change-of-measure formulas from recent multi-sided radial SLE theory were wrong, the tripod limit could satisfy the same discrete constraints without being three-sided radial SLE_2.

What would settle it

Simulate the wired uniform spanning tree on a δ-hexagonal approximation of a domain with non-constant conformal radius (e.g., a disk or rectangle with three marked boundary points), record the trifurcation positions conditional on both branches exiting through the third marked point, and compare the empirical density with p(Ω;x1,x2,x3;z) in (1.8) as δ→0; a disagreement beyond discretization error would falsify Theorem 1.1.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The trifurcation point has an explicit, conformally covariant density, so the probability that the three branches meet in any given region of a simply connected domain can be computed in the scaling limit.
  • Conditional on the meeting point, the branches are governed by three-sided radial SLE_2, transferring the known properties of that SLE process to the wired UST tripod.
  • The paper derives a new closed-form expectation for chordal SLE_2: the expected renormalized harmonic measure of the curve seen from a boundary point equals a simple ratio of boundary Poisson kernels (Proposition 1.4).
  • The identity between the discrete observable and the SLE partition function identifies the tripod as a lattice realization of a CFT correlation function with boundary weight 1 and bulk weight (1,1), strengthening the UST–logarithmic CFT connection.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the same determinant-based observable may converge to multi-sided radial SLE partition functions for other values of κ on other lattice models, suggesting a route toward lattice realizations of n-sided radial SLE.
  • Beyond the paper: because the proof uses the hexagonal lattice crucially, the lattice-dependent prefactor (3√3/4, the dual-face area) is expected to change on other lattices; a square-lattice computation recovering the same continuum density with a different prefactor would confirm universality of the limiting law.
  • Beyond the paper: the explicit density p can be used as a direct numerical prediction for simulated UST tripods, including the conditional law of the three branches; a mismatch would localize the failure either in the lattice-observable computation or in the imported multi-sided SLE theory.
  • Beyond the paper: the closed-form expectation in Proposition 1.4 might be derived independently by solving a boundary-value problem, providing a check of the full chain without relying on multi-sided SLE uniqueness.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the trifurcation point and tripod formed by three boundary branches in the wired uniform spanning tree on δ-scaled hexagonal-lattice approximations of a bounded 3-polygon, conditionally on the two branches from x1 and x2 exiting through x3. The main results are: (i) an explicit, conformally covariant density for the scaling limit of the trifurcation point (Theorem 1.1), obtained from a new determinant observable via Fomin's formula and discrete Poisson-kernel asymptotics; and (ii) the convergence of the conditional law of the whole tripod to three-sided radial SLE_2 with κ=2 (Theorem 1.3). The proof combines the discrete determinant computation, Beurling-type estimates for limit interchanges, known LERW/UST convergence results, and the theory of multi-sided radial SLE imported from the authors' recent preprint [HPW25]. A separate consequence for chordal SLE_2 is given in Proposition 1.4.

Significance. If the results hold, this is the first lattice-model realization of multi-sided radial SLE, and it identifies the scaling limit of a discrete UST observable with the three-sided radial SLE_2 partition function. A notable strength is that no parameters are fitted: the discrete determinant computation and Fomin's formula produce the density (1.8) with explicit lattice constants (e.g., 3√3/4), and the coincidence Z_tri = Z_{3-rad} at κ=2 is verified algebraically (Eq. (2.52)). The proof is unusually explicit about the needed scaling-limit estimates (Lemmas 3.6, 3.7, 3.12), and the paper gives pointer-level detail for the limit-interchange arguments. The main caveat is that the final identification with the three-sided radial SLE_2 law relies on imported uniqueness and Radon–Nikodym results from [HPW25].

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.4, Definition 1.2, Lemmas 2.9–2.10 (Eq. 2.51)] The identification of the tripod limit with three-sided radial SLE_2 is load-bearing and depends on unproved external results: the uniqueness of the law characterized by the conditional-marginal description in Definition 1.2 and the Radon–Nikodym formula (2.51) from [HPW25, Lemma 2.11]. If those results were incorrect, Theorem 1.3 would fail even though Theorem 1.1 and the tightness/marginal-convergence parts would remain valid. The authors are transparent about the dependence, but for a journal article the relevant statements should be quoted in full and either proved in an appendix or explicitly declared as hypotheses. As written, the main theorem is conditional on a preprint (co-authored by one of the present authors) that the referee cannot verify from this manuscript alone.
  2. [§4.4, Eq. (4.40)–(4.41)] The final step of the proof of Theorem 1.3 passes from the conditional law given {t∈B(z,ε)} to the conditional law given the exact value t, and then lets r→0. The bound R(ε,r)≲1 is proved, and it is clear that R(ε,r)→1 for fixed r, but the limiting argument for conditional measures on the zero-probability event {t} is only asserted ('This gives the conclusion'). Please spell out the exchange of limits (ε→0 then r→0, or a regular-conditional-probability argument) so that the identification of the conditional law of (γ1,γ2) given (γ3,t) is fully rigorous.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1.1] Typo: 'trifucartion' should be 'trifurcation' in the paragraph after Figure 1.1.
  2. [§3.4, Lemma 3.11] The notation 'C( Ω\ {x1, x3})' is unclear; presumably it means the space of bounded continuous functions on Ω minus the two marked points. Please clarify.
  3. [§3.3, Proof of Proposition 3.5] The constant 4/(3√3) is introduced without explicitly stating that it arises from the area 3√3/4 δ² of the dual triangle. A short parenthetical would help.
  4. [§2.4, Lemma 2.10] The proof of Lemma 2.10 sketches the Brownian-loop-measure computation but relies on [HPW25, Section 2.5]; since (2.51) is central, it would be helpful to state precisely which formulas from [HPW25] are being used.
  5. [§4.3, Lemma 4.8] Minor grammar: 'We denote by η^{δn}_{1,T_r} = (u0,...,uL) is the boundary branch' should read 'We denote by ... the boundary branch'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the discrete determinant computation is independent and the match with the three-sided SLE partition function is verified by direct algebra; reliance on [HPW25] is external theory, not a reduction to this paper's own inputs.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained on the discrete side. Lemma 3.1 expresses the trifurcation probability as a 3×3 determinant of discrete Poisson kernels using Fomin's formula and the hexagonal-lattice geometry; Proposition 3.2 and Lemma 3.4 identify the scaling limit as a constant multiple of Ztri; Proposition 3.5 supplies the normalizing integral. The density in Theorem 1.1 is thus a computed limit, not a fitted parameter or a renamed input. The tripod convergence in Theorem 1.3 combines Propositions 4.1, 4.5 and 4.9 to show that any subsequential limit has the defining conditional-marginal structure of Definition 1.2, and then imports the uniqueness and Radon–Nikodym formulas from [HPW25] to identify the limit as three-sided radial SLE2. This is a genuine external-theory reliance, and the paper is transparent about it ("The proof of the convergence to three-sided radial SLE2 relies on tools developped recently from [HPW25]"). Although [HPW25] shares an author with the present paper, its statements concern the SLE side, do not assume the UST tripod convergence, and are not derived from the discrete observable; hence they are independent support rather than a circular premise. The coincidence Ztri = Z3-rad at κ=2 is verified directly in (2.52) and is not assumed. The only caveat is that [HPW25] is a recent preprint whose proofs are not reproduced here; that is a completeness or correctness risk, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard discrete-complex-analysis tools ([CS11], [CW21]), established LERW/UST-to-SLE convergence ([Zha08], [LSW04]), and the recently developed multi-sided radial SLE theory ([HL21], [HPW25]). The paper's own contribution is the Fomin-formula observable and the limit identification; it introduces no free parameters or new entities. The load-bearing external input is HPW25's Radon-Nikodym derivative formulas and uniqueness of the SLE characterization.

axioms (6)
  • standard math Fomin's formula (determinantal identity for non-intersecting walks) [Fom01, Thm 6.1]
    Used in Lemma 3.1 to evaluate the third-order determinantal probability (3.6); the paper relies on the external theorem without proof.
  • standard math Convergence of discrete Green's functions and Poisson kernels on isoradial (hexagonal) graphs [CS11, Cor 3.11, Thm 3.13] and [CW21, Cor 3.8]
    Used throughout Section 2.3 and Section 3 to take scaling limits of the determinants; the hexagonal lattice is isoradial.
  • standard math Weak Beurling-type estimate [CS11, Prop 2.11] with a universal exponent α
    Used in Lemmas 3.6, 3.7, 4.3, 4.8 to bound hitting probabilities near the boundary; the exponent is imported without proof.
  • standard math Convergence of chordal SLE_2 from UST branches [Zha08] and radial SLE_2 from LERW [LSW04]
    Used as black boxes in Lemma 4.2 and Lemma 4.6 to get the base curve convergences feeding Theorem 1.3.
  • domain assumption Theory of multi-sided radial SLE [HL21, HPW25]: uniqueness of the definition (Def 1.2), Radon-Nikodym derivatives (Lemmas 2.9, 2.10), coordinate change (Lemma 2.8), resampling
    These results are taken as given; the paper does not prove them. If they fail, the identification of the limit law with three-sided radial SLE_2 is unsupported.
  • domain assumption Domain approximation: (Ω^δ;x_j^δ) → (Ω;x_j) in Carathéodory sense plus Hausdorff convergence (1.1) and C^{1+ε} boundary near marked points
    Stated in Theorems 1.1/1.3; needed for the Beurling estimates and uniform convergence of discrete Poisson kernels.

reviewed 2026-08-03 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tripod in uniform spanning tree and three-sided radial SLE$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5BN7MTNX

@misc{pith2026251111151,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tripod in uniform spanning tree and three-sided radial SLE$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5BN7MTNX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.11151}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Fix a bounded $3$-polygon $(\Omega; x_1, x_2, x_3)$ with three marked boundary points $x_1, x_2, x_3\in\partial\Omega$ and suppose $(\Omega^{\delta}; x_1^{\delta}, x_2^{\delta}, x_3^{\delta})$ is an approximation of $(\Omega; x_1, x_2, x_3)$ on $\delta$-scaled hexagonal lattice. We consider uniform spanning tree (UST) in $\Omega^{\delta}$ with wired boundary conditions. Conditional on the event that both branches from $x_1^{\delta}$ and $x_2^{\delta}$ hit the boundary through $x_3^{\delta}$, the two branches meet at a point $\trifurcation^{\delta}$ which we call trifurcation, and the union of the three branches from $x_j^{\delta}$ to $\trifurcation^{\delta}$ form a tripod in the UST. We compute the scaling limit of the tripod: the distribution of trifurcation is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure with explicit density; given the trifurcation, the conditional law of the tripod is three-sided radial SLE$_2$. The proof relies on construction of a new observable for trifurcation in our key lemma--Lemma~3.1--where we use Fomin's formula and the geometry of the hexagonal lattice in an essential way. Interestingly, the scaling limit of the observable for trifurcation coincides with the partition function for three-sided radial $\SLE_2$. Our result gives a probabilistic interpretation of the correlation function in CFT which has conformal weights $1$ at the three boundary points and has a spinless field of weights $(1,1)$ at the bulk point.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.11151 by Hao Wu, Jiacheng Ding, Mingchang Liu.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1: Illustration for tripod and trifurcation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: The directions of three adjacent edges of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: In tripod, suppose {u1 ⇝ e δ 1 , u2 ⇝ e δ 2 , u3 ⇝ e δ 3} as in (a). We delete two edges ⟨u, u1⟩ and ⟨u, u2⟩ and add two edges ⟨x δ 1 , x δ,◦ 1 ⟩ and ⟨x δ 2 , x δ,◦ 2 ⟩ (the two edges in red) as in (b). Such operation induces a bijection from configurations in Aδ 1 ∩ Aδ 2 ∩ {t δ = u} ∩ Bδ 1 to configurations in C δ 1 . We will evaluate P[C δ ℓ ] using Fomin’s formula. Denote by W(u, e) the set of all fin… view at source ↗
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: The fat black curve indicates the boundary branch [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_3_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.3. Figure 3.3: Suppose u, u1, u3 ∈ η δ 1 and u2 ̸∈ η δ 1 . In (a), we have u2 ⇝ e for some e ∈ E∂ 13(Ωδ ). We delete the edge ⟨u, u3⟩ and add the edge e δ 1 . Such operation induces a bijection from configurations in Aδ 1∩{u, u1, u3 ∈ η δ 1}∩{u2 ⇝ e} to configurations in {u3 ⇝ e δ 3} ∩ {u1 ⇝ e δ 1} ∩ {u2 ⇝ e} ∩ {⟨u, u1⟩ ∈ T δ}. In (b), we have u2 ⇝ e for some e ∈ E∂ 31(Ωδ ). We delete the edge ⟨u, u3⟩ and add the edge … view at source ↗
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: In (a), the fat blue curve indicates the boundary branch [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_3_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: The fat black curve indicates the boundary branch [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_4_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: The conformal map ϕr is from Ω3(Tr) = Ω \ γ3[0, Tr] onto Ω such that ϕr(x1) = x1, ϕr(x2) = x2 and ϕr(γ3(Tr)) = x3. The conformal map gU is from Ω\(ϕr(γ1[0, τ U 1 ]∪γ2[0, τ U 2 ])) onto Ω such that gU (ϕr(γ1(τ U 1 ))) = x1, gU (ϕr(γ2(τ U 2 ))) = x2 and gU (x3) = x3. Proof. We denote φ1(·) = ϕr(·), z1 = ϕr(z), ϵ1 = 1 4 ϵ|ϕ ′ r (z)|; φ2(·) = gU (ϕr(·)), z2 = gU (ϕr(z)), ϵ2 = 1 4 ϵ|g ′ U (ϕr(z))ϕ ′ r (z)|. K… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    H\" o lder regularity and dimension bounds for random curves

    Michael Aizenman and Almut Burchard. H\" o lder regularity and dimension bounds for random curves. Duke Math. J. , 99(3):419--453, 1999

    1999

  2. [2]

    Conformal welding of quantum disks and multiple SLE : the non-simple case

    Morris Ang, Nina Holden, Xin Sun, and Pu Yu. Conformal welding of quantum disks and multiple SLE : the non-simple case. Preprint in arXiv:2310.20583, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Multiple S chramm- L oewner evolutions and statistical mechanics martingales

    Michel Bauer, Denis Bernard, and Kalle Kyt \"o l \"a . Multiple S chramm- L oewner evolutions and statistical mechanics martingales. J. Stat. Phys. , 120(5-6):1125--1163, 2005

    2005

  4. [4]

    Piecewise Temperleyan dimers and a multiple SLE _8

    Nathanaël Berestycki and Mingchang Liu. Piecewise Temperleyan dimers and a multiple SLE _8 . arXiv:2301.08513

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    On the uniqueness of global multiple SLE s

    Vincent Beffara, Eveliina Peltola, and Hao Wu. On the uniqueness of global multiple SLE s. Ann. Probab. , 49(1):400--434, 2021

    2021

  6. [6]

    Convergence of I sing interfaces to S chramm's SLE curves

    Dmitry Chelkak, Hugo Duminil-Copin, Cl\' e ment Hongler, Antti Kemppainen, and Stanislav Smirnov. Convergence of I sing interfaces to S chramm's SLE curves. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris , 352(2):157--161, 2014

    2014

  7. [7]

    Federico Camia and Charles M. Newman. Critical percolation exploration path and SLE 6 : a proof of convergence. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 139(3-4):473--519, 2007

    2007

  8. [8]

    Discrete complex analysis on isoradial graphs

    Dmitry Chelkak and Stanislav Smirnov. Discrete complex analysis on isoradial graphs. Adv. Math. , 228(3):1590--1630, 2011

    2011

  9. [9]

    Universality in the 2 D I sing model and conformal invariance of fermionic observables

    Dmitry Chelkak and Stanislav Smirnov. Universality in the 2 D I sing model and conformal invariance of fermionic observables. Invent. Math. , 189(3):515--580, 2012

    2012

  10. [10]

    On the convergence of massive loop-erased random walks to massive SLE(2) curves

    Dmitry Chelkak and Yijun Wan. On the convergence of massive loop-erased random walks to massive SLE(2) curves . Electron. J. Probab. , 26:Paper No. 54, 2021

    2021

  11. [11]

    Euler integrals for commuting SLE s

    Julien Dub\'edat. Euler integrals for commuting SLE s. J. Stat. Phys. , 123(6):1183--1218, 2006

    2006

  12. [12]

    Flores and Peter Kleban

    Steven M. Flores and Peter Kleban. A solution space for a system of null-state partial differential equations: P art 3. Comm. Math. Phys. , 333(2):597--667, 2015

    2015

  13. [13]

    Loop-erased walks and total positivity

    Sergey Fomin. Loop-erased walks and total positivity. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 353(9):3563--3583, 2001

    2001

  14. [14]

    Connection probabilities of multiple FK-Ising interfaces

    Yu Feng, Eveliina Peltola, and Hao Wu. Connection probabilities of multiple FK-Ising interfaces. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 189(1-2):281--367, March 2024

    2024

  15. [15]

    Multiple Ising interfaces in annulus and 2N-sided radial SLE

    Yu Feng, Hao Wu, and Lu Yang. Multiple Ising interfaces in annulus and 2N-sided radial SLE . Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , 2024(6):5326--5372, 2024

    2024

  16. [16]

    Vivian Olsiewski Healey and Gregory F. Lawler. N-sided radial S chramm- L oewner evolution. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 181(1-3):451--488, 2021

    2021

  17. [17]

    Hypergeometric SLE with =8 : convergence of UST and LERW in topological rectangles

    Yong Han, Mingchang Liu, and Hao Wu. Hypergeometric SLE with =8 : convergence of UST and LERW in topological rectangles. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar\'e Probab. Stat. , 61(2):1163--1211, 2025

    2025

  18. [18]

    Multiradial SLE with spiral: resampling property and boundary perturbation, 2025

    Chongzhi Huang, Eveliina Peltola, and Hao Wu. Multiradial SLE with spiral: resampling property and boundary perturbation, 2025. arXiv:2509.22045

    arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Multiple SLE type scaling limits: from local to global, 2019

    Alex Karrila. Multiple SLE type scaling limits: from local to global, 2019. arXiv:1903.10354

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    U ST branches, martingales, and multiple SLE(2)

    Alex Karrila. U ST branches, martingales, and multiple SLE(2) . Electron. J. Probab. , 25:83, 2020

    2020

  21. [21]

    Long-range properties of spanning trees

    Richard Kenyon. Long-range properties of spanning trees. J. Math. Phys. , 41(3):1338--1363, 2000

    2000

  22. [22]

    R. Kenyon. The L aplacian and D irac operators on critical planar graphs. Invent. Math. , 150(2):409--439, 2002

    2002

  23. [23]

    Boundary correlations in planar LERW and UST

    Alex Karrila, Kalle Kyt\" o l\" a , and Eveliina Peltola. Boundary correlations in planar LERW and UST . Comm. Math. Phys. , 376(3):2065--2145, 2020

    2065

  24. [24]

    Kozdron and Gregory F

    Michael J. Kozdron and Gregory F. Lawler. The configurational measure on mutually avoiding SLE paths. In Universality and renormalization , volume 50 of Fields Inst. Commun. , pages 199--224. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2007

    2007

  25. [25]

    Pure partition functions of multiple SLE s

    Kalle Kyt\"ol\"a and Eveliina Peltola. Pure partition functions of multiple SLE s. Comm. Math. Phys. , 346(1):237--292, 2016

    2016

  26. [26]

    Random curves, scaling limits and loewner evolutions

    Antti Kemppainen and Stanislav Smirnov. Random curves, scaling limits and loewner evolutions. Ann. Probab. , 45(2):698--779, 03 2017

    2017

  27. [27]

    Kenyon and David B

    Richard W. Kenyon and David B. Wilson. Boundary partitions in trees and dimers. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 363(3):1325--1364, 2011

    2011

  28. [28]

    Commutation relations for two-sided radial SLE , 2024

    Ellen Krusell, Yilin Wang, and Hao Wu. Commutation relations for two-sided radial SLE , 2024. arXiv:2405.07082

    arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Gregory F. Lawler. Partition functions, loop measure, and versions of SLE . J. Stat. Phys. , 134(5-6):813--837, 2009

    2009

  30. [30]

    Uniform spanning tree in topological polygons, partition functions for SLE (8), and correlations in c=--2 logarithmic CFT

    Mingchang Liu, Eveliina Peltola, and Hao Wu. Uniform spanning tree in topological polygons, partition functions for SLE (8), and correlations in c=--2 logarithmic CFT . Ann. Probab. , 53(1):23--78, 2025

    2025

  31. [31]

    Lawler, Oded Schramm, and Wendelin Werner

    Gregory F. Lawler, Oded Schramm, and Wendelin Werner. Conformal invariance of planar loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning trees. Ann. Probab. , 32(1B):939--995, 2004

    2004

  32. [32]

    Lawler and Wendelin Werner

    Gregory F. Lawler and Wendelin Werner. The B rownian loop soup. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 128(4):565--588, 2004

    2004

  33. [33]

    Loop-erased random walk branch of uniform spanning tree in topological polygons

    Mingchang Liu and Hao Wu. Loop-erased random walk branch of uniform spanning tree in topological polygons. Bernoulli , 29(2):1555--1577, 2023

    2023

  34. [34]

    Global and local multiple SLE s for 4 and connection probabilities for level lines of GFF

    Eveliina Peltola and Hao Wu. Global and local multiple SLE s for 4 and connection probabilities for level lines of GFF . Comm. Math. Phys. , 366(2):469--536, 2019

    2019

  35. [35]

    Crossing probabilities of multiple I sing interfaces

    Eveliina Peltola and Hao Wu. Crossing probabilities of multiple I sing interfaces. Ann. Appl. Probab. , 33(4):3169--3206, 2023

    2023

  36. [36]

    Scaling limits of loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning trees

    Oded Schramm. Scaling limits of loop-erased random walks and uniform spanning trees. Israel J. Math. , 118:221--288, 2000

    2000

  37. [37]

    Critical percolation in the plane: conformal invariance, C ardy's formula, scaling limits

    Stanislav Smirnov. Critical percolation in the plane: conformal invariance, C ardy's formula, scaling limits. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S\'er. I Math. , 333(3):239--244, 2001

    2001

  38. [38]

    Contour lines of the two-dimensional discrete G aussian free field

    Oded Schramm and Scott Sheffield. Contour lines of the two-dimensional discrete G aussian free field. Acta Math. , 202(1):21--137, 2009

    2009

  39. [39]

    Oded Schramm and David B. Wilson. S LE coordinate changes. New York J. Math. , 11:659--669 (electronic), 2005

    2005

  40. [40]

    Random planar curves and S chramm- L oewner evolutions

    Wendelin Werner. Random planar curves and S chramm- L oewner evolutions. In Lectures on probability theory and statistics , volume 1840 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 107--195. Springer, Berlin, 2004

    2004

  41. [41]

    Generating random spanning trees more quickly than the cover time

    David Bruce Wilson. Generating random spanning trees more quickly than the cover time. In Proceedings of the T wenty-eighth A nnual ACM S ymposium on the T heory of C omputing ( P hiladelphia, PA , 1996) , pages 296--303. ACM, New York, 1996

    1996

  42. [42]

    Hypergeometric SLE : conformal M arkov characterization and applications

    Hao Wu. Hypergeometric SLE : conformal M arkov characterization and applications. Comm. Math. Phys. , 374(2):433--484, 2020

    2020

  43. [43]

    Loop-erased random walk and P oisson kernel on planar graphs

    Ariel Yadin and Amir Yehudayoff. Loop-erased random walk and P oisson kernel on planar graphs. Ann. Probab. , 39(4):1243--1285, 2011

    2011

  44. [44]

    The scaling limits of planar LERW in finitely connected domains

    Dapeng Zhan. The scaling limits of planar LERW in finitely connected domains. Ann. Probab. , 36(2):467--529, 2008

    2008

  45. [45]

    Existence and uniqueness of nonsimple multiple SLE

    Dapeng Zhan. Existence and uniqueness of nonsimple multiple SLE . J. Stat. Phys. , 191(8):Paper No. 101, 15, 2024

    2024

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 3, 2026.