pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.11325 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-14 · 🪐 quant-ph · nlin.PS

Quantum limit cycles and synchronization from a measurement perspective

Tobias Nadolny , Christoph Bruder This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 22:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph nlin.PS
keywords quantum limit cyclesquantum synchronizationheterodyne measurementquantum trajectoriesvan der Pol oscillatorcontinuous measurementquantum optics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Continuous heterodyne measurement makes quantum limit cycles visible through conditioned state trajectories that match noisy classical oscillators.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines limit-cycle oscillators in quantum systems by applying continuous heterodyne measurement to the quantum van der Pol oscillator and two-level systems. Conditioning the quantum state evolution on the measurement record produces individual trajectories in which the limit-cycle motion stands out clearly. These trajectories behave like classical limit cycles driven by noise, and the same data yield synchronization measures that match quantities obtained directly from heterodyne detection experiments.

Core claim

Under continuous heterodyne measurement the conditioned quantum trajectories of a driven quantum oscillator or two-level system trace out stable limit cycles whose statistics and synchronization properties are directly comparable to those of classical limit cycles subject to noise, while also supplying experimentally accessible signatures of quantum synchronization.

What carries the argument

Conditioned quantum trajectories generated by continuous heterodyne measurement, which evolve the state according to the measurement record and thereby expose the underlying limit-cycle attractor.

If this is right

  • Quantum synchronization can be quantified from the same heterodyne signal that is already recorded in many experiments.
  • Individual quantum trajectories replace ensemble averages as the natural way to visualize and characterize quantum limit cycles.
  • The same measurement approach applies equally to the van der Pol model and to simpler two-level systems.
  • Quantum limit cycles inherit robustness properties familiar from classical oscillators once noise is included through the measurement record.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The measurement-based view could be used to design feedback protocols that stabilize or switch between different quantum limit cycles.
  • Similar conditioned trajectories might reveal synchronization in larger networks of quantum oscillators without requiring full state tomography.
  • The approach supplies a direct route to test whether quantum coherence modifies the locking range or phase diffusion of a limit cycle compared with its classical counterpart.

Load-bearing premise

The measurement record and the resulting conditioned trajectories faithfully display the intrinsic limit-cycle dynamics without measurement back-action creating spurious cycles or destroying the analogy to classical noisy oscillators.

What would settle it

A calculation or experiment showing that the statistics of the conditioned trajectories deviate markedly from the predicted limit-cycle shape even when the system parameters are set to produce a clear classical limit cycle.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.11325 by Christoph Bruder, Tobias Nadolny.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Four trajectories of a van-der-Pol oscillator, Eq. (1), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Time evolution of the classical vdP oscillator shown by the probability distributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Phase locking of classical vdP oscillators. (a) Arnold tongue. The blue dashed line indicates the synchronization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Frequency entrainment of classical vdP oscillators. (a) Observed frequency difference as a function of detuning. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Time evolution of the quantum vdP oscillator shown by the Husimi-Q distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Quantum vdP oscillator: limit cycle under measurement. (a) The heatmap shows the steady-state Husimi-Q distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Phase locking of quantum vdP oscillators. (a) The grayscale shows the maximum of the phase distribution max [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Frequency entrainment of quantum vdP oscillators. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Time evolution of the spin-1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Spin-1/2 oscillator: Limit cycle under measurement. (a) The heatmap shows the steady-state Husimi-Q distribution [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Phase locking of spin-1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Frequency entrainment of spin-1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Limit-cycle oscillators are the basic building blocks for synchronization; yet, the notion of a quantum limit cycle has remained unclear. Here, we study quantum limit cycles and synchronization in the presence of continuous heterodyne measurement. The resulting quantum trajectories, i.e., time evolutions of the quantum state conditioned on the measurement outcome, make the quantum limit cycles apparent. We focus on the paradigmatic model of the quantum van der Pol oscillator and on two-level systems. Our work provides insights into limit cycles in quantum systems, emphasizing their similarity to classical limit cycles subject to noise. Additionally, we connect theoretical measures of quantum synchronization to quantities experimentally accessible via heterodyne detection.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines quantum limit cycles and synchronization through the lens of continuous heterodyne measurement on paradigmatic systems including the quantum van der Pol oscillator and two-level systems. It argues that the conditioned quantum trajectories obtained from the measurement outcomes render the limit-cycle dynamics visible, demonstrating their similarity to classical limit cycles subject to noise, while also relating theoretical synchronization measures to experimentally accessible heterodyne signals.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated without unraveling-specific artifacts, the work would clarify the notion of quantum limit cycles and offer a practical bridge between theoretical synchronization metrics and laboratory observables in quantum optics platforms. The emphasis on measurement-conditioned trajectories as a diagnostic tool is a constructive contribution to the field.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2, derivation of the stochastic equation for the complex amplitude (around Eq. (12)): The heterodyne unraveling introduces a measurement-rate-dependent drift and multiplicative noise term that damps amplitude fluctuations while inducing phase diffusion. The claimed similarity to classical noisy limit cycles would be strengthened by an explicit check that the orbiting statistics and synchronization measures remain qualitatively unchanged when the measurement rate is varied independently while the unconditional master equation is held fixed; without this, the similarity risks being an artifact of the chosen unraveling rather than an intrinsic feature.
minor comments (2)
  1. The qubit example is introduced in the abstract but receives less detailed trajectory analysis than the van der Pol case; a brief comparison of the extracted synchronization measures between the two systems would improve clarity.
  2. Figure captions should explicitly state the measurement rate used for the displayed trajectories to allow readers to assess robustness.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive suggestion regarding the robustness of our claims. We address the major comment point by point below and will incorporate the recommended analysis into a revised version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2, derivation of the stochastic equation for the complex amplitude (around Eq. (12)): The heterodyne unraveling introduces a measurement-rate-dependent drift and multiplicative noise term that damps amplitude fluctuations while inducing phase diffusion. The claimed similarity to classical noisy limit cycles would be strengthened by an explicit check that the orbiting statistics and synchronization measures remain qualitatively unchanged when the measurement rate is varied independently while the unconditional master equation is held fixed; without this, the similarity risks being an artifact of the chosen unraveling rather than an intrinsic feature.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification would strengthen the manuscript. The heterodyne unraveling does introduce measurement-rate-dependent terms in the stochastic equation for the complex amplitude. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) performing the suggested check: we will vary the heterodyne measurement rate over a range while rescaling the system parameters (e.g., gain and loss rates) so that the unconditional master equation remains fixed. We will then compare the resulting orbiting statistics (radial and phase distributions) and synchronization measures for the quantum van der Pol oscillator and two-level systems. Preliminary analysis indicates that the qualitative features of the noisy limit cycles persist, supporting that the observed behavior is not an artifact of a particular unraveling strength. We will include the corresponding figures and discussion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: quantum trajectories derived from standard heterodyne unraveling without redefinition or self-referential fitting

full rationale

The paper models the quantum van der Pol oscillator and qubit systems under continuous heterodyne measurement using the standard stochastic Schrödinger equation for conditioned trajectories. Limit-cycle behavior is exhibited directly in the resulting stochastic paths and synchronization measures, which are computed from the measurement records rather than fitted to them. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a parameter fit by construction, nor does any central claim rest on a self-citation chain that is itself unverified. The similarity to classical noisy limit cycles is presented as an observation from the trajectories, not as a definitional equivalence. The derivation remains self-contained against the unconditional master equation and standard quantum optics tools.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; assessment is limited by lack of full text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5396 in / 1072 out tokens · 38030 ms · 2026-05-17T22:22:32.432957+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The noise processes have zero mean,E[ξ x(t)] =E[ξ y(t)] = 0, and their variances areE[ξ x(t)ξx(t′)] =E[ξ y(t)ξy(t′)] = δ(t−t ′)

    Influence of fluctuations In the presence of fluctuations, the time evolution of the vdP oscillator can be modeled by the Langevin equa- tion ˙α=−iωα+κ 1α/2−κ 2|α|2α+σξ x(t) +iσξ y(t).(3) The termsξ x(t) andξ y(t) are stationary Gaussian white- noise processes that induce independent fluctuations in the real and imaginary parts of the amplitudeα. The nois...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The position of the peak corresponds to the frequency of the limit cycle, while the spectral linewidth is determined by the fluctuations. B. Two coupled oscillators In this section, we show that two limit-cycle oscilla- tors that are coupled strongly enough can entrain their frequencies and lock their phases despite the presence of frequency detuning or noise

    work page

  3. [3]

    Frequency detuning We start the analysis assuming zero fluctuations. The evolution of two detuned and dissipatively coupled van- der-Pol oscillators is [1, Section 8.2] ˙α=−iδα/2 +κ 1α/2−κ 2|α|2α+V(β−α)/2 (7a) ˙β= +iδβ/2 +κ 1β/2−κ 2|β|2β+V(α−β)/2 (7b) with frequency detuningδand coupling strengthV≥0. In writing Eqs. (7), we have implicitly moved to a fram...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The equations for the phases derived from Eqs

    Influence of fluctuations In the presence of noise, phase locking and frequency entrainment are approximate rather than exact, as we now show. The equations for the phases derived from Eqs. (7) with added noise at strengthσ 2/2 (setting again rA,B =r 0) are ˙ϕA = + δ 2 + V 2 sin(ϕB −ϕ A) + σ√ 2 ξA ,(11a) ˙ϕB =− δ 2 + V 2 sin(ϕA −ϕ B) + σ√ 2 ξB .(11b) The ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    6 resembles the classical limit cycle in its circular shape, it is static and appears not to feature the dynam- ical oscillations of a classical limit cycle

    Quantum limit cycles under heterodyne detection While the steady state shown in the top-right panel of Fig. 6 resembles the classical limit cycle in its circular shape, it is static and appears not to feature the dynam- ical oscillations of a classical limit cycle. The reason is that the density operatorρdescribes the probability dis- tribution of an ense...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Here, we use the Husimi-Q distribution, extending the definition of Eq

    Phase locking Various measures for phase locking of quantum oscilla- tors have been suggested [22, 57, 63, 64, 67–69]. Here, we use the Husimi-Q distribution, extending the definition of Eq. (16) to two oscillators Q(α, β) = 1 π ⟨α| ⊗ ⟨β|ρ|α⟩ ⊗ |β⟩.(19) It is obtained by projecting the density operator on the coherent states|α⟩and|β⟩. We chose the Husimi-...

    work page

  7. [7]

    The spectra of classical oscillators were introduced in Section II B; see Eq

    Frequency entrainment Frequency entrainment of the two oscillators can be analyzed via their spectra [70]. The spectra of classical oscillators were introduced in Section II B; see Eq. (13). For quantum oscillators, the steady-state spectra are de- fined as [62] SA(ω) = lim t→∞ Z ∞ −∞ dτ⟨a †(t+τ)a(t)⟩e −iωτ , (21) (and analogously for oscillatorB), i.e., ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    Consider the evolution of the two quantum vdP oscilla- tors in Eq

    Quantum synchronization under heterodyne detection We now show that both phase locking and frequency entrainment can be observed via heterodyne detection. Consider the evolution of the two quantum vdP oscilla- tors in Eq. (18) with an additional independent measure- ment for each oscillator, d dt ρm =−i δ 2[a†a−b †b, ρm] +κ 1(D[a†] +D[b †])ρm +κ 2(D[a2] +...

    work page

  9. [9]

    subjectively real

    Quantum limit cycles under heterodyne detection As for the quantum vdP oscillator, the spin’s limit- cycle structure becomes apparent through heterodyne de- tection. In the presence of a measurement ofσ −, the master equation is ˙ρm =−i[ ω 2 σz, ρm] +γ +D[σ+]ρm +γ −D[σ−]ρm+ (33) + dW dt √γ− eiωmt(σ− −Tr σ−ρm )ρm + H.c. , with the usual statistics of the n...

    work page

  10. [10]

    It is obtained in analogy to Eq

    Phase locking We use a distribution for the phase difference similar to the analyses of the classical and quantum vdP oscillators. It is obtained in analogy to Eq. (20) by first projecting the density matrix on spin-coherent states Q(θA, ϕA, θB, ϕB) = 1 4π2 ⟨θA, ϕA| ⊗ ⟨θB, ϕB|ρ|θ A, ϕA⟩ ⊗ |θB, ϕB⟩. (39) 12 Then, we integrate over the polar anglesθ A,B and...

    work page

  11. [11]

    (21), SA,B(ω) = lim t→∞ Z ∞ −∞ dτ⟨σ + A,B(t+τ)σ − A,B(t)⟩e −iωτ (41) i.e., the Fourier transforms of the two-time correlations ⟨σ+ A,B(t+τ)σ − A,B(t)⟩

    Frequency entrainment To analyze frequency entrainment of two detuned spins, we calculate the spectra in analogy to Eq. (21), SA,B(ω) = lim t→∞ Z ∞ −∞ dτ⟨σ + A,B(t+τ)σ − A,B(t)⟩e −iωτ (41) i.e., the Fourier transforms of the two-time correlations ⟨σ+ A,B(t+τ)σ − A,B(t)⟩. The spectra are shown in Fig. 13 and display frequency entrainment in the same way as...

    work page

  12. [12]

    The conditional master equation is ˙ρ=−i δ 4[σz A −σ z B, ρ] +VD[σ − A +σ − B]ρ +γ + D[σ+ A] +D[σ + B] ρ+γ − D[σ− A] +D[σ − B] ρ + dWA dt √γ− eiωmt(σ− A −Tr σ− A ρm )ρm + H.c

    Quantum synchronization under heterodyne detection The analysis of synchronization of two spins under het- erodyne detection is carried out in the same way as for the two quantum vdP oscillators. The conditional master equation is ˙ρ=−i δ 4[σz A −σ z B, ρ] +VD[σ − A +σ − B]ρ +γ + D[σ+ A] +D[σ + B] ρ+γ − D[σ− A] +D[σ − B] ρ + dWA dt √γ− eiωmt(σ− A −Tr σ− A...

    work page

  13. [13]

    Pikovsky, M

    A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths,Synchroniza- tion: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences, Cam- bridge Nonlinear Science Series (Cambridge University Press, New York, United States, 2001)

    work page 2001

  14. [14]

    Bennett, M

    M. Bennett, M. F. Schatz, H. Rockwood, and K. Wiesen- feld, Huygens’s clocks, Proceedings of the Royal Society A458, 563 (2002)

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    G. H. Goldsztein, A. N. Nadeau, and S. H. Strogatz, Synchronization of clocks and metronomes: A pertur- bation analysis based on multiple timescales, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science31, 023109 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    J. A. Acebr´ on, L. L. Bonilla, C. J. P´ erez Vicente, F. Ri- tort, and R. Spigler, The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena, Reviews of Modern Physics77, 137 (2005)

    work page 2005

  17. [17]

    S. H. Strogatz,Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engi- neering(Taylor & Francis, Andover, England, 2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    K. C. Cox, J. M. Weiner, and J. K. Thompson, Phase di- agram for injection locking a superradiant laser, Physical Review A90, 053845 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    J. M. Weiner, K. C. Cox, J. G. Bohnet, and J. K. Thomp- son, Phase synchronization inside a superradiant laser, Physical Review A95, 033808 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    A. W. Laskar, P. Adhikary, S. Mondal, P. Katiyar, S. Vinjanampathy, and S. Ghosh, Observation of quan- tum phase synchronization in spin-1 atoms, Physical Re- view Letters125, 013601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Natale, A

    G. Natale, A. Baumg¨ artner, J. Stefaniak, D. Baur, S. Hertlein, D. Rivero, T. Esslinger, and T. Don- ner, Synchronization of Quasi-Particle Excitations in a Quantum Gas with Cavity-Mediated Interactions (2025), arXiv:2504.17731

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    V. R. Krithika, P. Solanki, S. Vinjanampathy, and T. S. Mahesh, Observation of quantum phase synchronization in a nuclear-spin system, Physical Review A105, 062206 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Zhang, Z

    L. Zhang, Z. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Zhang, Z. Wu, J. Jie, and Y. Lu, Quantum synchronization of a single trapped-ion qubit, Physical Review Research5, 033209 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Behrle, T

    T. Behrle, T. L. Nguyen, F. Reiter, D. Baur, B. de Neeve, M. Stadler, M. Marinelli, F. Lancellotti, S. F. Yelin, and J. P. Home, Phonon Laser in the Quantum Regime, Phys- ical Review Letters131, 043605 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Y. Li, Z. Xie, X. Yang, Y. Li, X. Zhao, X. Cheng, X. Peng, J. Li, E. Lutz, Y. Lin, and J. Du, Experimental realization and synchronization of a quantum van der Pol oscillator (2025), arXiv:2504.00751

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    J. Liu, Q. Wu, J. E. Moore, H. Haeffner, and C. W. W¨ achtler, Observation of synchronization between two quantum van der Pol oscillators in trapped ions (2025), arXiv:2509.18423

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Koppenh¨ ofer, C

    M. Koppenh¨ ofer, C. Bruder, and A. Roulet, Quantum synchronization on the IBM Q system, Physical Review Research2, 023026 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Z. Tao, F. Schmolke, C.-K. Hu, W. Huang, Y. Zhou, J. Zhang, J. Chu, L. Zhang, X. Sun, Z. Guo, J. Niu, W. Weng, S. Liu, Y. Zhong, D. Tan, D. Yu, and E. Lutz, Noise-induced quantum synchronization with entangled oscillations, Nature Communications16, 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    T. E. Lee, C.-K. Chan, and S. Wang, Entanglement tongue and quantum synchronization of disordered os- cillators, Physical Review E89, 022913 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Roulet and C

    A. Roulet and C. Bruder, Quantum synchronization and entanglement generation, Physical Review Letters121, 063601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    B. Zhu, J. Schachenmayer, M. Xu, F. Herrera, J. G. Re- strepo, M. J. Holland, and A. M. Rey, Synchronization of interacting quantum dipoles, New Journal of Physics 17, 083063 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Witthaut, S

    D. Witthaut, S. Wimberger, R. Burioni, and M. Timme, Classical synchronization indicates persistent entangle- ment in isolated quantum systems, Nature Communica- 14 tions8, 14829 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Lorenzo, B

    S. Lorenzo, B. Militello, A. Napoli, R. Zambrini, and G. M. Palma, Quantum synchronisation and clustering in chiral networks, New Journal of Physics24, 023030 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    A. Mari, A. Farace, N. Didier, V. Giovannetti, and R. Fazio, Measures of Quantum Synchronization in Con- tinuous Variable Systems, Physical Review Letters111, 103605 (2013)

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    Bandyopadhyay and T

    B. Bandyopadhyay and T. Banerjee, Aging transition in coupled quantum oscillators, Physical Review E107, 024204 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    L¨ orch, E

    N. L¨ orch, E. Amitai, A. Nunnenkamp, and C. Bruder, Genuine quantum signatures in synchronization of an- harmonic self-oscillators, Physical Review Letters117, 073601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    L¨ orch, S

    N. L¨ orch, S. E. Nigg, A. Nunnenkamp, R. P. Tiwari, and C. Bruder, Quantum synchronization blockade: Energy quantization hinders synchronization of identical oscilla- tors, Physical Review Letters118, 243602 (2017)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Amitai, M

    E. Amitai, M. Koppenh¨ ofer, N. L¨ orch, and C. Bruder, Quantum effects in amplitude death of coupled anhar- monic self-oscillators, Physical Review E97, 052203 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Dutta and N

    S. Dutta and N. R. Cooper, Critical response of a quan- tum van der Pol oscillator, Physical Review Letters123, 250401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Mok, L.-C

    W.-K. Mok, L.-C. Kwek, and H. Heimonen, Synchro- nization boost with single-photon dissipation in the deep quantum regime, Physical Review Research2, 033422 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    Delmonte, A

    A. Delmonte, A. Romito, G. E. Santoro, and R. Fazio, Quantum effects on the synchronization dynamics of the Kuramoto model, Physical Review A108, 032219 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Shen, W.-K

    Y. Shen, W.-K. Mok, C. Noh, A. Q. Liu, L.-C. Kwek, W. Fan, and A. Chia, Quantum synchronization effects induced by strong nonlinearities, Physical Review A107, 053713 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Nadolny and C

    T. Nadolny and C. Bruder, Macroscopic Quantum Synchronization Effects, Physical Review Letters131, 190402 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    B. Paul, B. Bandyopadhyay, and T. Banerjee, Attractive- repulsive interaction in coupled quantum oscillators, Physical Review E110, 034210 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Kehrer, T

    T. Kehrer, T. Nadolny, and C. Bruder, Quantum syn- chronization through the interference blockade, Physical Review A110, 042203 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Weiss, S

    T. Weiss, S. Walter, and F. Marquardt, Quantum- coherent phase oscillations in synchronization, Physical Review A95, 041802 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Navarrete-Benlloch, T

    C. Navarrete-Benlloch, T. Weiss, S. Walter, and G. J. de Valc´ arcel, General Linearized Theory of Quantum Fluctuations around Arbitrary Limit Cycles, Physical Review Letters119, 133601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    Roulet and C

    A. Roulet and C. Bruder, Synchronizing the smallest possible system, Physical Review Letters121, 053601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    Chia, L.-C

    A. Chia, L.-C. Kwek, and C. Noh, Relaxation oscilla- tions and frequency entrainment in quantum mechanics, Physical Review E102, 042213 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Ben Arosh, M

    L. Ben Arosh, M. C. Cross, and R. Lifshitz, Quantum limit cycles and the Rayleigh and van der Pol oscillators, Physical Review Research3, 013130 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Parra-L´ opez and J

    ´A. Parra-L´ opez and J. Bergli, Synchronization in two- level quantum systems, Physical Review A101, 062104 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    R. Tan, C. Bruder, and M. Koppenh¨ ofer, Half-integer vs. integer effects in quantum synchronization of spin sys- tems, Quantum6, 885 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Buˇ ca, C

    B. Buˇ ca, C. Booker, and D. Jaksch, Algebraic theory of quantum synchronization and limit cycles under dissipa- tion, Scipost Physics12, 097 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Setoyama and Y

    W. Setoyama and Y. Hasegawa, Lie Algebraic Quantum Phase Reduction, Physical Review Letters132, 093602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Setoyama and Y

    W. Setoyama and Y. Hasegawa, Lie-algebraic quantum phase reduction based on heterodyne detection, Physical Review A111, 012202 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Dutta, S

    S. Dutta, S. Zhang, and M. Haque, Quantum Origin of Limit Cycles, Fixed Points, and Critical Slowing Down, Physical Review Letters134, 050407 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Y. J. Zhao, J. E. Moore, J. Thingna, and C. W. W¨ achtler, Quantum Synchronization of Perturbed Oscillating Co- herences (2025), arXiv:2510.11601

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Chia, W.-K

    A. Chia, W.-K. Mok, L.-C. Kwek, and C. Noh, Quan- tization of nonlinear non-Hamiltonian systems (2025), arXiv:2503.06939

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Jacobs and D

    K. Jacobs and D. A. Steck, A straightforward introduc- tion to continuous quantum measurement, Contempo- rary Physics47, 279 (2006)

    work page 2006

  60. [60]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Measure- ment and Control(Cambridge University Press, New York, United States, 2010)

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    A. J. Daley, Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems, Advances in Physics (2014)

    work page 2014

  62. [62]

    Gambetta, A

    J. Gambetta, A. Blais, M. Boissonneault, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, and S. M. Girvin, Quantum trajectory approach to circuit QED: Quantum jumps and the Zeno effect, Physical Review A77, 012112 (2008)

    work page 2008

  63. [63]

    K. W. Murch, S. J. Weber, C. Macklin, and I. Siddiqi, Observing single quantum trajectories of a superconduct- ing quantum bit, Nature502, 211 (2013)

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    H. Yu, Y. Zhang, Q. Wu, C.-X. Shan, and K. Mølmer, Conditional Dynamics in Heterodyne Detection of Super- radiant Lasing with Incoherently Pumped Atoms, Phys- ical Review Letters133, 073601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    Bushev, D

    P. Bushev, D. Rotter, A. Wilson, F. Dubin, C. Becher, J. Eschner, R. Blatt, V. Steixner, P. Rabl, and P. Zoller, Feedback Cooling of a Single Trapped Ion, Physical Re- view Letters96, 043003 (2006)

    work page 2006

  66. [66]

    Kato and H

    Y. Kato and H. Nakao, Enhancement of quantum syn- chronization via continuous measurement and feedback control, New Journal of Physics23, 013007 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Y. Shen, H. Y. Soh, W. Fan, and L.-C. Kwek, Enhanc- ing quantum synchronization through homodyne mea- surement, noise, and squeezing, Physical Review E108, 024204 (2023)

    work page 2023

  68. [68]

    O. V. Zhirov and D. L. Shepelyansky, Synchronization and Bistability of a Qubit Coupled to a Driven Dissi- pative Oscillator, Physical Review Letters100, 014101 (2008)

    work page 2008

  69. [69]

    Weiss, A

    T. Weiss, A. Kronwald, and F. Marquardt, Noise- induced transitions in optomechanical synchronization, New Journal of Physics18, 013043 (2016)

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    Es’haqi-Sani, G

    N. Es’haqi-Sani, G. Manzano, R. Zambrini, and R. Fazio, Synchronization along quantum trajectories, Physical Review Research2, 023101 (2020). 15

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    Risken,The Fokker-Planck Equation(Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1989)

    H. Risken,The Fokker-Planck Equation(Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1989)

    work page 1989

  72. [72]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy,Quantum Optics(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1997)

    work page 1997

  73. [73]

    Adler, A study of locking phenomena in oscillators, Proceedings of the IRE34, 351 (1946)

    R. Adler, A study of locking phenomena in oscillators, Proceedings of the IRE34, 351 (1946)

    work page 1946

  74. [74]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, New York, United States, 2002)

    work page 2002

  75. [75]

    T. E. Lee and H. R. Sadeghpour, Quantum synchroniza- tion of quantum van der Pol oscillators with trapped ions, Physical Review Letters111, 234101 (2013)

    work page 2013

  76. [76]

    Walter, A

    S. Walter, A. Nunnenkamp, and C. Bruder, Quan- tum synchronization of a driven self-sustained oscillator, Physical Review Letters112, 094102 (2014)

    work page 2014

  77. [77]

    H. J. Carmichael,Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1(Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1999)

    work page 1999

  78. [78]

    L¨ orch, J

    N. L¨ orch, J. Qian, A. Clerk, F. Marquardt, and K. Ham- merer, Laser Theory for Optomechanics: Limit Cycles in the Quantum Regime, Physical Review X4, 011015 (2014)

    work page 2014

  79. [79]

    Ludwig and F

    M. Ludwig and F. Marquardt, Quantum many-body dy- namics in optomechanical arrays, Physical Review Let- ters111, 073603 (2013)

    work page 2013

  80. [80]

    M. R. Hush, W. Li, S. Genway, I. Lesanovsky, and A. D. Armour, Spin correlations as a probe of quantum syn- chronization in trapped-ion phonon lasers, Physical Re- view A91, 061401 (2015)

    work page 2015

Showing first 80 references.