Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 53 references

Evidence for atomic-scale vibron-mediated electron bunching

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Vibron-mediated electron bunching appears in atomic-scale shot noise at a single Fe impurity.

desk verdict A careful STM shot-noise study that plausibly observes vibron-mediated bunching at a single Fe impurity, but the central Fano factor is modest and the shot-noise identification rests on a near-linear current dependence over a narrow range. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.11803 v1 pith:BQNTXRW5 submitted 2025-11-14 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall

A. Maiti , M. Amato , V. S. Stolyarov , H. Aubin , J. Estève , F. Pistolesi , M. Aprili , F. Massee This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hall
keywords shotnoiseFanofactorvibronelectronbunchingFranck-CondonblockadeBi2Se3scanningtunnelingmicroscopesingleimpurity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that electrons tunnelling through an iron impurity embedded in Bi2Se3 can arrive in bunches because each tunnelling event leaves the impurity's vibrational mode excited. It supports this with two linked measurements: tunnelling spectra showing 16 meV vibronic sidebands with Franck-Condon coupling λ≈2.6, and simultaneous shot-noise maps showing super-Poissonian noise (Fano factor >1) that grows with bias into the resonance and saturates. A control dimer impurity, where Coulomb charging dominates, shows suppressed noise, ruling out generic artifacts. If correct, this is the first atomic-scale demonstration of a theoretical prediction made decades ago and opens a route to injecting N-paired electrons from a single site.

What carries the argument

The central element is a subsurface Fe impurity acting as a nano-electromechanical resonator: its electronic occupation is coupled through Holstein coupling to a 16 meV A1g phonon mode of Bi2Se3, so that each tunnelling event displaces the oscillator and transiently raises the probability of the next event. Shot noise is quantified by the Fano factor F=S/(2e|I|). The authors connect F to the vibron dynamics through the second-order correlation function g(2)(t), yielding F=1+2(Iτ/e)(g(2)(0+)−1), where τ is the vibron lifetime and g(2)(0+)>1 encodes vibron-enhanced tunnelling. Franck-Condon factors set the weights of multi-vibron sidebands and give the fitted λ, and the rate hierarchy Γ≫γ,1/τ

What would settle it

Widen the shot-noise measurement to currents spanning several orders of magnitude (e.g., up to microamperes) at a fixed bias in the resonance. If the noise power departs from linearity in current—or the Fano factor changes systematically with current—the super-Poissonian value may be an artifact of the narrow current window rather than vibronic bunching. Alternatively, tuning the bias so that the 16 meV vibron mode is no longer excited (below the sideband threshold) should return F to 1; a persistent F>1 there would indicate another mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Tunnelling through a single Fe impurity that replaces a Bi atom beneath the Bi2Se3 surface is accompanied by excitation of a 16 meV surface vibron mode. The differential conductance shows oscillatory sidebands with a spacing of 16.0±0.8 meV matching the A1g surface phonon, fitted with Franck-Condon factors giving an electron-vibron coupling of λ=2.6±0.5. Simultaneous current-noise measurements at the centre of the impurity give a Fano factor F=1.16 that rises with voltage as the resonance and higher vibron sidebands are entered, saturates where the sidebands fade, and returns to 1 at the valence band edge. The authors argue that after a careful elimination of magnetic, interference, and char

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the measured current noise at the Fe1 centre is genuine shot noise with a power that scales linearly with the DC current; the authors report only a near-linear dependence over a narrow pA–nA range, so if a current-proportional mechanical or electronic artifact contributes, the elevated Fano factor would not prove electron bunching.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Super-Poissonian shot noise (F>1) at a single impurity is a direct, atomic-scale signature of electron bunching, a regime previously seen only in engineered mesoscopic devices.
  • The Fano factor rises with the number of accessible vibron excitations and saturates when the sidebands disappear, tying the noise enhancement to the vibron spectrum.
  • The absence of noise enhancement on a neighbouring dimer impurity, where Coulomb charging dominates, indicates that vibronic coupling rather than generic disorder drives the bunching.
  • Because the enhanced noise is spatially localized at the impurity centre and insensitive to magnetic fields, it can be used as a local probe of electron-phonon correlations in other doped topological insulators.
  • If electron coherence can be added, the same mechanism could serve as an on-demand injector of N-paired electrons into surrounding quantum matter.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The model's prediction that F increases with vibron lifetime suggests that molecules with longer-lived vibrational modes should show avalanche-like bunching; looking for giant Fano factors in such systems would be a direct test of this paper's picture.
  • The sharp spatial contrast—noise at the impurity centre but not at the lobes—implies that the orbital character of the tunnelling path matters for vibronic feedback; a theory incorporating impurity wavefunctions rather than point coupling would be needed to capture it.
  • If the linear current dependence is confirmed over a wider range, the inferred inverse-current phonon lifetime would indicate that inelastic tunnelling itself damps the vibron; measuring F as a function of temperature could separate this from lifetime-limited mechanisms.
  • The same shot-noise technique applied to other dopants with known phonon modes could map which vibrations mediate bunching and estimate coupling strengths from a single noise map.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a combined scanning tunnelling spectroscopy and shot-noise study of an individual subsurface Fe impurity (Fe1) in Bi2Se3. The authors observe periodic fine structure in the normalized differential conductance with spacing 16.0±0.8 meV, identified as vibron sidebands of the A^2_1g surface phonon, and fit the sideband envelope to extract a Franck–Condon coupling λ=2.6±0.5. Simultaneously recorded current noise yields a Fano factor F=S/(2eI) that increases from ~1 to ~1.16 as the bias enters the impurity resonance, is spatially localized at the impurity centre, and is absent in 2Fe1 dimer controls. The paper interprets F>1 as vibron-mediated electron bunching, supporting this with a minimal model F=1+2(Iτ/e)(g^(2)(0+)-1) with τ=1 ps from literature and g^(2)(0+)~13 chosen to reproduce the observed F. The Discussion carefully lists alternative sources (mechanical instabilities, charging, resistance fluctuations, multichannel tunnelling, spin dynamics) and argues they are excluded.

Significance. If the shot-noise interpretation is correct, this is the first atomic-scale observation of vibron-mediated electron bunching, a phenomenon predicted two decades ago and of potential interest for injecting N-electron bundles. The paper's strengths are the simultaneous atomically resolved STS and MHz shot-noise measurements, the clear spatial localization of the excess noise, the 2Fe1 control showing reduced noise, and the explicit, honest discussion of alternative mechanisms and the model's limitations. However, the central claim currently rests on a modest F~1.16 enhancement with no reported error bars in the main text, on a 'near-linear' S(I) relation over a restricted current range, and on a model whose key parameter g^(2)(0+) is fixed to reproduce the measured F. These gaps are load-bearing because F>1 only implies bunching if the measured noise is genuine shot noise.

major comments (5)
  1. [§2 'Shot-noise spectroscopy'; SI 2.6] The central definition F=S/(2e|I|) only has the meaning of a Fano factor if the excess noise is shot noise, i.e. S scales linearly with |I| and is white in the measured band. The paper reports only a 'near-linear' current dependence (SI 2.6) and explicitly concedes in the Discussion that the linear behaviour may arise from the restricted pA–nA range. A current-proportional artifact intrinsic to the Fe1 junction (e.g., bias-dependent gain, resistance fluctuations proportional to I, or nonlinear I–V conversion of voltage noise) would produce the same apparent F>1 without electron bunching. The 2Fe1 control and spatial map reduce but do not exclude such an artifact. Please provide a direct S-vs-I measurement over at least a decade at fixed bias and show that the excess noise is white in the measured 20 kHz band.
  2. [Fig. 4c; §2] The main text reports F rising to about 1.16, but no error bars or statistical significance are given for this modest enhancement. A 16% excess could be within systematic or statistical uncertainty. Please provide error bars or confidence intervals on F from repeated spectra or a calibrated noise floor, and a quantitative test that F>1 at the relevant biases. Also show representative raw excess-noise spectra to verify that the 20 kHz band around 1.05 MHz is not contaminated and that the noise is white.
  3. [§3 'Vibron induced noise'; SI 3] The interpretive model is partly circular. λ=2.6 is fit to the same Franck–Condon sidebands used to identify the vibron, and g^(2)(0+) is chosen so that F=1+2(Iτ/e)(g^(2)(0+)-1) reproduces the measured F=1.16 with τ=1 ps from literature. Thus the statement 'we obtain g^(2)(0+)≃13' is a retrodiction, not an independent test of the vibronic-bunching mechanism. Please either derive g^(2)(0+) from a microscopic model using the measured λ, or explicitly present the model as illustrative. The measured F>1 is independent evidence for bunching, but the model should not be cited as independent confirmation.
  4. [§3 'Origin of super Poissonian noise'] The exclusion of resonant tunnelling via interacting levels (ref. 39) is too quick. A single localized interacting level can itself produce super-Poissonian noise; the DFT result that Fe1 has only one d_z2-derived resonance does not by itself rule out this dynamical mechanism. Please provide a quantitative comparison—e.g., the expected F and its bias/current dependence for the Safonov-type mechanism—and explain why it fails to reproduce the observed spatial localization and the contrast with 2Fe1. This is needed because the paper's case rests on 'in the absence of alternative sources'.
  5. [§4 Outlook; Fig. 4e] The paper notes that the noise remains enhanced well beyond the resonance and only returns to Poissonian near the valence band edge, and that no enhancement is observed at the impurity lobes despite sidebands there. These observations are not explained by the minimal vibronic model and are labelled 'puzzling'. For a claim of evidence, the authors should address whether these features are compatible with the vibronic-bunching interpretation or indicate an additional contribution to S. As written, the mismatch between the noise energy dependence and the sideband structure weakens the direct connection between F>1 and the measured vibron.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Author Contributions] The author list has M. Amato, but the contributions section mentions 'A. Amato'; check spelling and initials.
  2. [Methods] 'normalised by (I/V) to remove the setup effect' is unclear; specify what the setup effect is (e.g., the tip–sample distance dependence of the transmission).
  3. [Throughout] The notation 'Fe1' and 'Fe 1' is used inconsistently; choose one convention and apply it uniformly.
  4. [§3 'Vibron induced noise'] The equation F=1+2(Iτ/e)(g^(2)(0+)-1) appears without derivation; give a brief derivation or a more explicit reference to Supplementary Information Section 3.
  5. [Fig. 4 caption] The sentence 'All other noise is linear in current' is confusing because the preceding sentence states that the charging-ring noise is quadratic; clarify which regions are included in 'all other'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Fano factor is an independently measured observable, and the model parameters are either externally fixed or explicitly calibrated post hoc rather than used as predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central evidence is the measured Fano factor F = S/2e|I| at the Fe1 centre; this is an experimental observable, not a derived quantity. The vibronic identification is anchored to the independently reported A2_1g surface phonon energy (16.0 ± 0.8 meV vs Raman/HREELS values) and to an external THz phonon lifetime τ = 1 ps. The only place where a model parameter is matched to the observation is the Discussion, where g^(2)(0+) ≃ 13 is explicitly 'obtained in order to reproduce the observed Fano factor of 1.16'; this is a post hoc consistency check, not a prediction, so it does not create a circular derivation. The multiple self-citations (setup, previous Fe-rotor work, one of several theoretical bunching predictions) are not load-bearing: they concern apparatus, background, or an already independently supported theoretical result. The paper also candidly flags the limited current range behind the 'near-linear' S(I) behaviour and the persistence of noise beyond the resonance, which are evidentiary limitations rather than circular steps. No equation reduces to an input or renames a fit as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main fitted parameters (λ, ħω) come from the spectroscopy that identifies the vibron, not from the noise data, which gives some independence. However, the quantitative noise model's g^(2)(0+) is fitted to reproduce the observed Fano factor, and τ is imported from literature, so the noise 'model' is not a parameter-free prediction. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • λ (dimensionless electron-vibron coupling) = 2.6 ± 0.5
    Fitted to differential-conductance sideband weights using Franck-Condon factors f_n ∝ λ^{2n}/n! e^{-λ^2} (Fig. 3g; SI 2.4). Used to argue strong coupling and a 10× rate enhancement for one-vibron processes.
  • ħω_osc (vibron energy) = 16.0 ± 0.8 meV
    Extracted by fitting the periodic d(gV/I)/dV oscillations with a periodic function (SI 2.3). Compared to Raman/HREELS surface mode near 16 meV.
  • g^(2)(0+) (second-order correlation at zero delay) = ~13
    Chosen to reproduce the observed Fano factor F=1.16 via F = 1 + 2(Iτ/e)(g^(2)(0+)-1) with τ=1 ps from ref 44. The model is back-fitted to the data rather than predicting F.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Holstein coupling model: a single harmonic vibron mode linearly coupled to the impurity charge, with rate hierarchy Γ >> γ, 1/τ.
    Used to write the Fano-factor formula F = 1 + 2(Iτ/e)(g^(2)(0+)-1). Not directly measured; stated in the 'Vibron induced noise' paragraph.
  • domain assumption Vibron lifetime τ = 1 ps as reported in THz spectroscopy experiments (ref 44).
    External literature value used to back out g^(2)(0+). If the actual lifetime differs, the inferred correlation strength changes.
  • domain assumption The Fe impurity is a non-interacting two-level system fluctuating between empty and singly-charged states; spin/coulomb effects are negligible in the noise interpretation.
    Used throughout; supported by magnetic-field insensitivity and the control on 2Fe1, but not directly proven.
  • domain assumption The 16 meV mode is the A_1g surface vibron of Bi2Se3.
    Assignment based on prior Raman and HREELS literature (refs 35,37,38), not independently measured in this work.
  • standard math The Franck-Condon sideband formula f_n ∝ λ^{2n}/n! e^{-λ^2} correctly weights sequential multi-vibron tunnelling in the strong-coupling limit.
    Standard quantum transport result (refs 16,17), used to fit λ from g(V).
  • domain assumption DFT ground-state calculations (PBE+SOC) correctly assign a single d_z2 resonance for Fe1 and mixed orbital character for 2Fe1.
    Used to rule out modulated tunnelling through multiple channels; DFT details in SI Section 1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evidence for atomic-scale vibron-mediated electron bunching." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BQNTXRW5

@misc{pith2026251111803,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evidence for atomic-scale vibron-mediated electron bunching},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BQNTXRW5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.11803}
}
abstract

Due to the Coulomb blockade effect, electrons rarely bunch during transport, a phenomenon observed only in a few specially engineered mesoscopic configurations. In this work, we introduce an atomically resolved shot-noise study to demonstrate the possibility of electron bunching through vibrational coupling which takes place in an atomically sized nano-electro-mechanical system. Using tunnelling spectroscopy, we observe signatures of vibron-assisted tunnelling on an Fe impurity in Bi$_2$Se$_3$. Notably, simultaneous shot-noise measurements at the centre of the vibrating impurity reveal super-Poissonian noise. In the absence of alternative sources of super-Poissonian noise, this implies vibronic-coupling-induced bunching of electrons during the tunnelling process through the impurity, as theoretically predicted decades ago. As a future outlook, if coherence between electrons can be implemented, vibron-mediated electron bunching at single atomic sites may be exploited as a local injection source of $N$-paired electrons.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Park, H., Park, J, Lim, A. K. L., Anderson, E. H., Alivisatos, P. A., & McEuen, P. L. Nanome- chanical oscillations in a single-C60 transistor.Nature407, 57 (2000)

    2000

  2. [2]

    H., Keane, Z

    Yu, L. H., Keane, Z. K., Ciszek, J. W., Cheng, L., Stewart, M. P., Tour, J. M., & Natelson, D. Inelastic electron tunnelling via molecular vibrations in single-molecule transistors.Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 266802 (2004)

    2004

  3. [3]

    A., H ¨uttel, A

    Steele, G. A., H ¨uttel, A. K., Witkamp, B., Poot, M., Meerwaldt, H. B., Kouwenhoven, L. P., & van der Zant, H. S. J. Strong coupling between single-electron tunneling and nanomechanical motion.Science325, 1103 (2009)

    2009

  4. [4]

    A., Abraham, & N

    Galperin, M., Ratner, M. A., Abraham, & N. Molecular transport junctions: vibrational effects. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter19, 103201 (2007)

    2007

  5. [5]

    J., & Pascual, J

    Franke, K. J., & Pascual, J. I. Effects of electron–vibration coupling in transport through single molecules.J. Phys.: Condens. Matter24, 394002 (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    N., Intrinsic noise of the single-electron transistor.Phys

    Korotkov, A. N., Intrinsic noise of the single-electron transistor.Phys. Rev. B49, 10381 (1994)

    1994

  7. [7]

    Birk, H., de Jong, M. J. M., & Sch ¨onenberger, C., Shot-noise suppression in the single-electron tunneling regime.Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1610 (1995)

    1995

  8. [8]

    Emary, C, P ¨oltl, C, Carmele, A., Kabuss, J., Knorr, A., & Brandes, T., Bunching and antibunch- ing in electronic transport.Phys. Rev. B85, 165417 (2012)

    2012

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    & von Oppen, F

    Koch, J. & von Oppen, F. Franck-Condon blockade and giant Fano factors in transport through single molecules.Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 206804 (2005)

    2005

  2. [10]

    & von Oppen, F

    Koch, J. & von Oppen, F. Pair tunneling through single molecules.Phys. Rev. B96, 056803 (2006)

    2006

  3. [11]

    J., Phonon effects in molecular transistors: Quantal and classical treatment.Phys

    Mitra, A., Aleiner, I., and Millis, A. J., Phonon effects in molecular transistors: Quantal and classical treatment.Phys. Rev. B69, 245302 (2004)

    2004

  4. [12]

    M., and Martin, I., Self-consistent theory of molecular switching

    Pistolesi, F., Blanter, Ya. M., and Martin, I., Self-consistent theory of molecular switching. Phys. Rev. B78, 085127 (2008)

    2008

  5. [13]

    Two-electron bunching in transport through a quantum dot induced by Kondo correlations.Phys

    Zarchin, O., Zaffalon, M., Heiblum, M., Mahalu, D., & Umansky, V . Two-electron bunching in transport through a quantum dot induced by Kondo correlations.Phys. Rev. B77, 241303 (2008) 12

    2008

  6. [14]

    K., Sivan, I., Rosenblatt, A., Heiblum, M., Umansky, V ., & Mahalu, D

    Choi, H. K., Sivan, I., Rosenblatt, A., Heiblum, M., Umansky, V ., & Mahalu, D. Robust electron pairing in the integer quantum hall effect regime.Nat. Commun.6, 7435 (2015)

    2015

  7. [15]

    S., Sadeghi, H., Rogers, G., Sangtarash, S., Dallas, P., Porfyrakis, K., Warner, J., Lambert, C

    Lau, C. S., Sadeghi, H., Rogers, G., Sangtarash, S., Dallas, P., Porfyrakis, K., Warner, J., Lambert, C. J., Briggs, G. A. D. & Mol, J. A. Redox-dependent Franck–Condon blockade and avalanche transport in a graphene–fullerene single-molecule transistor.Nano Lett.16, 170–176 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    & Dymond, E

    Franck, J. & Dymond, E. G., Elementary processes of photochemical reactions.J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans.21, 536 (1926)

    1926

  9. [17]

    Condon, E., A theory of intensity distribution in band systems.Phys. Rev.28. 1182 (1926)

    1926

  10. [18]

    G., von Oppen, F., & Ensslin, K

    Leturcq, R., Stampfer, c, Inderbitzin, K., Durrer, L., Hierold, C., Mariani, E., and Schultz, M. G., von Oppen, F., & Ensslin, K. Franck–Condon blockade in suspended carbon nanotube quantum dots.Nat. Phys.5, 327 (2009)

    2009

  11. [19]

    H., Nazin, G

    Qiu, X. H., Nazin, G. V ., & Ho, W. Vibronic states in single molecule electron transport.Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 206102 (2004)

    2004

  12. [20]

    & Liljeroth, P., Orbital and charge- resolved polaron states in CdSe dots and rods probed by scanning tunneling spectroscopy.Phys

    Sun, Z., and Swart, I., Delerue, C., and Vanmaekelbergh, D. & Liljeroth, P., Orbital and charge- resolved polaron states in CdSe dots and rods probed by scanning tunneling spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 196401 (2009)

    2009

  13. [21]

    L., & Franke, K

    Reecht, G., Krane, N., Lotze, C., Zhang, L., and Briseno, A. L., & Franke, K. J., Vibrational excitation mechanism in tunneling spectroscopy beyond the Franck-Condon model.Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 116804 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Li, C., Kaspar, C., Zhou, P., Liu, J.-C., Chahib, O., Glatzel, T., H ¨aner, R., Aschauer, U., Decurtins, S., Liu, S.-X., Thoss, M., Meyer, E., & Pawlak, R., Strong signature of electron- vibration coupling in molecules on Ag(111) triggered by tip-gated discharging.Nat. Commun....

    2023

  15. [23]

    Novotn ´y, T., Donarini, A., Flindt, C., & Jauho, A.-P., Shot noise of a quantum shuttle.Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 248302 (2004)

    2004

  16. [24]

    Haupt, F., Novotn ´y, T., & Belzig, W., Current noise in molecular junctions: Effects of the electron-phonon interaction.Phys. Rev. B82, 165441 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    L., & van Ruitenbeek, J

    Kumar, M., Avriller, R., Yeyati, A. L., & van Ruitenbeek, J. M., Detection of vibration-mode scattering in electronic shot noise.Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 146602 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    & Aprili, M

    Massee, F., Dong, Q., Cavanna, A., Jin, Y . & Aprili, M. Atomic scale shot-noise using cryo- genic MHz circuitry.Rev. Sci. Instrum.89, 093708 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    M., & B ¨uttiker, M., Shot noise in mesoscopic conductors.Phys

    Blanter, Y . M., & B ¨uttiker, M., Shot noise in mesoscopic conductors.Phys. Rep.336, 1-166 (2000). 13

    2000

  20. [28]

    S., Aprili, M., & Massee, F., Tunable high speed atomic rotor in Bi2Se3 revealed by current noise.ACS Nano15, 1421-1425 (2021)

    Desvignes, L., Stolyarov, V . S., Aprili, M., & Massee, F., Tunable high speed atomic rotor in Bi2Se3 revealed by current noise.ACS Nano15, 1421-1425 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Song, C. -L. et al. Gating the charge state of single Fe dopants in the topological insulator Bi2Se3 with a scanning tunneling microscope.Phys. Rev. B86, 045441 (2012)

    2012

  22. [30]

    Stolyarov, V . S. et al. Double Fe-impurity charge state in the topological insulator Bi 2Se3. Appl. Phys. Lett.111, 251601 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Abdalla, L. B. et al. Topological insulator Bi 2Se3(111) surface doped with transition metals: An ab initio investigation.Phys. Rev. B88, 045312 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    Kondo, T. et al. Anomalous dressing of Dirac fermions in the topological surface state of Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3, and Cu-doped Bi2Se3.Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 217601 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    Cheng, W., & Ren, S.-F., Phonons of single quintuple Bi2Te3 and Bi2Se3 films and bulk mate- rials.Phys. Rev. B83, 094301 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Boulares, I., Shi, G., Kioupakis, E., Lo ˇsˇt´ak, P., Uher, C., & Merlin, R., Surface phonons in the topological insulators Bi2Se3 and Bi2Te3.Solid State Commun.271, 1 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Kung, H.-H., Salehi, M., Boulares, I., Kemper, A. F., Koirala, N., Brahlek, M., Lo ˇsˇt´ak, P., Uher, C., Merlin, R., Wang, X., Cheong, S.-W., Oh, S., & Blumberg, G., Surface vibrational modes of the topological insulator Bi 2Se3 observed by Raman spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. B95, ...

    2017

  28. [36]

    Rev.116, 11181 (2016)

    Swart, I., Liljeroth, P., & Vanmaekelbergh, D., Scanning probe microscopy and spectroscopy of colloidal semiconductor nanocrystals and assembled structures.Chem. Rev.116, 11181 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    S., & Xiong, Q., Raman Spectroscopy of Few-Quintuple Layer Topological Insulator Bi 2Se3 Nanoplatelets.Nano Lett.11, 2407 (2011)

    Zhang, J., Peng, Z., Soni, A., Zhao, Y ., Xiong, Y ., Peng, B., Wang, J., Dresselhaus, M. S., & Xiong, Q., Raman Spectroscopy of Few-Quintuple Layer Topological Insulator Bi 2Se3 Nanoplatelets.Nano Lett.11, 2407 (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    W., Zhang, J., Zhu, X., & Guo, J., Anomalous acoustic plasmon mode from topologically protected states

    Jia, X., Zhang, S., Sankar, R., Chou, F.-C., Wang, W., Kempa, K., Plummer, E. W., Zhang, J., Zhu, X., & Guo, J., Anomalous acoustic plasmon mode from topologically protected states. Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 136805 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    S., Savchenko, A

    Safonov, S. S., Savchenko, A. K., Bagrets, D. A., Jouravlev, O. N., Nazarov, Y . V ., Linfield, E. H. & Ritchie, D. A. Enhanced shot noise in resonant tunneling via interacting localized states. Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 136801 (2003)

    2003

  32. [40]

    & Morr, D

    Cocklin, S. & Morr, D. K. Scanning tunneling shot-noise spectroscopy in Kondo systems. Phys. Rev. B100, 125146 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    and Berndt, R

    Burtzlaff, A., Weismann, A., Brandbyge, M. and Berndt, R. Shot noise as a probe of spin- polarized transport through single atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 016602 (2015). 14

    2015

  34. [42]

    & Fransson, J

    Pradhan, S. & Fransson, J. Shot noise as a probe of spin-correlated transport through single atoms.Phys. Rev. B97, 115409 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Phys.8, 5 (2006)

    Flensberg, K., Electron–vibron coupling in suspended nanotubes.New J. Phys.8, 5 (2006)

    2006

  36. [44]

    A., Boldyrev, K

    Melnikov, A. A., Boldyrev, K. N., Selivanov, Yu. G., Martovitskii, V . P., Chekalin, S. V . & Ryabov, E. A. Coherent phonons in aBi 2Se3 film generated by an intense single-cycle THz pulse.Phys. Rev. B97, 214304 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    & Pellegrini, B

    Iannaccone, G., Lombardi, G., Macucci, M. & Pellegrini, B. Enhanced shot noise in resonant tunneling: Theory and experiment.Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1054–1057 (1998)

    1998

  38. [46]

    Thupakula, U., Perrin, V ., Palacio-Morales, A., Cario, L., Aprili, M., Simon, P., & Massee, F., Coherent and Incoherent Tunneling into Yu-Shiba-Rusinov States Revealed by Atomic Scale Shot-Noise Spectroscopy.Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 247001 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Variationally optimized atomic orbitals for large-scale electronic structures.Phys

    Ozaki, T. Variationally optimized atomic orbitals for large-scale electronic structures.Phys. Rev. B.67, 155108 (2003)

    2003

  40. [48]

    & Kino, H

    Ozaki, T. & Kino, H. Numerical atomic basis orbitals from H to Kr.Phys. Rev. B.69, 195113 (2004)

    2004

  41. [49]

    & Ernzerhof, M

    Perdew, J., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Letters.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  42. [50]

    & Jhi, S

    Kim, J. & Jhi, S. Magnetic phase transition in Fe-doped topological insulator Bi 2Se3.Phys. Rev. B.92, 104405 (2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    & Ciechan, A

    Ptok, A., Kapcia, K. & Ciechan, A. Electronic properties of Bi 2Se3 dopped by 3d transition metal (Mn, Fe, Co, or Ni) ions.J. Phys. Condens. Matter.33, 065501 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    The crystal structure of Bi 2Te3−xSex.J

    Nakajima, S. The crystal structure of Bi 2Te3−xSex.J. Phys. Chem. Solids.24, 479-485 (1963)

    1963

  45. [53]

    Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dis- persion correction.J

    Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dis- persion correction.J. Comput. Chem..27, 1787-1799 (2006) AcknowledgementsWe thank W. Belzig, J. C. Cuevas, J. Fransson and S. Pradhan for insightful discus- sions. A.M. acknowledges funding...

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.