Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

Large Scale White Noise and Cosmology

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Any non-linear, non-conservative local system with sub-Poissonian initial conditions inevitably generates a large-scale white-noise floor, and its absence in cosmic microwave background data forces the primordial spectrum to end near the co

desk verdict A solid mathematical framework for large-scale white noise, but the headline 1 pc constraint is not derived in this paper and should not be stated unconditionally. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.13866 v3 pith:7MSR3S6O submitted 2025-11-17 astro-ph.CO hep-ph

Gabriela Barenboim , Aurora Ireland , Albert Stebbins This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.COhep-ph
keywords large-scalewhitenoisesub-PoissonianspectrummodecouplingprimordialpowerHarrison-Zel'dovichNo-No-Scaletheoremcosmicconfusionradiation-eracosmology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to prove that large-scale white noise is a generic, non-optional product of non-linear local dynamics, and that cosmology is such a system. It shows that any non-linear, non-conservative PDE with sub-Poissonian initial conditions transfers power from short to long wavelengths through mode coupling, filling the largest scales with a k^0 component that dominates over a Harrison-Zel'dovich k^1 spectrum no matter how small the inhomogeneities are. This happens even when non-linearities are smaller than linear terms by a factor of roughly 10^5. Applying the mechanism to radiation-era acoustic waves, the paper argues that the observed absence of this white noise on Hubble scales forces the primordial spectrum to be cut off above comoving scales of about one parsec, or else to have spectral running α_s ≲ −0.015. A careful reader would care because the largest observable scales become a probe of otherwise inaccessible small-scale physics in the early universe.

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the leading-order Born approximation (LOBA) applied to a general homogeneous, spatially homogeneous non-linear PDE. Around any small-amplitude solution, the quadratic non-linearity acts as a source that mixes pairs of Fourier modes; the first non-linear correction to the long-wavelength field is an integral over short-wavelength products, M[t,0,G,k,−k] ≈ ∫ dt' G[t,t',0] N^{(2)}[t',G,k,−k]. For a radiation-era acoustic fluid this becomes the LSWN kernel W_+, obtained analytically in terms of regularized hypergeometric functions, whose sign and magnitude determine the relic white-noise amplitude. The companion No-No-Scale theorem states that a finite relic LSWN re

What would settle it

Measure the cosmic microwave background and large-scale structure power spectra at wavenumbers k ≲ 10^{-3} Mpc^{-1} with enough sensitivity to detect or exclude a k^0 component; if the low-k spectrum continues to fall as k^{0.965} with no flattening down to Hubble scales, the prediction of an unavoidable LSWN floor at k_LSWN ≳ 0.1 Gpc^{-1} is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working from a general class of spatially homogeneous non-linear PDEs, the paper claims to prove a no-go result: any system whose leading non-linearity is quadratic or higher, and whose zero-wavenumber mode is not conserved, converts short-wavelength power into a k^0 white-noise floor at long wavelengths, provided the initial conditions are sub-Poissonian (zero power at k→0). It then shows that the standard cosmological model is exactly such a system: the Harrison-Zel'dovich spectrum with n_s ≈ 0.965 is sub-Poissonian, so radiation-era acoustic non-linearities generate a relic white-noise component that grows like the linear growing mode. Because no such component is observed at k ≲ 0.1 Gpc^

Load-bearing premise

The real-universe conclusion depends on the unproven premise that the locally measurable curvature density evolves by a non-conservative, quadratic local PDE with an order-unity white-noise kernel W_+—and the paper's own radiation-era d-variable example shows that an exactly conservative variable with W_+=0 produces no LSWN.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sub-Poissonian initial conditions are not stable: any non-linear, non-conservative local evolution immediately populates k=0 with a white-noise floor, even if the system is deep in the linear regime.
  • In the standard model, the ratio of LSWN to linear power at scale k scales as (k_LSWN/k)^{n_s}; with n_s ≈ 0.965, the absence of LSWN at k ≲ 0.1 Gpc^{-1} forces k_cut ≲ 1 pc^{-1} or α_s ≲ −0.015.
  • The No-No-Scale theorem implies that a scale-free, pure power-law initial spectrum cannot yield finite relic LSWN; a small-scale cutoff is mandatory, and its wavenumber determines the observable crossover scale k_LSWN.
  • On the largest scales the non-linearly generated white noise and a primordial spectrum of similar shape are observationally degenerate (cosmic confusion); separating them requires a wide dynamic range of measurements or higher-order correlation functions.
  • Any source of shear in the cosmic fluid—acoustic oscillations, phase transitions, gravitational waves, vorticity—contributes to the curvature density and hence to LSWN, so non-detection constrains the integrated shear history, not just acoustic waves.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same formalism provides a route to inversion: a measured upper limit on k^0 power at k ≲ 10^{-3} Mpc^{-1} can be converted into an upper limit on the integral of the shear history. The paper states the constraint but does not write the combined-sources inversion; that is an extension.
  • Because the quadratic kernels that produce P_LSWN also generate a large-scale bispectrum, measuring the cosmic microwave background bispectrum at very low l could distinguish relic LSWN from a primordial n_s ≈ 1 spectrum even where the two-point function is degenerate—a testable consequence the paper leaves implicit.
  • The claim that LSWN dominates for arbitrarily small amplitudes relies on an enormous dynamic range between the non-linear scale and the largest scale; in a finite simulation or laboratory analog the effect will be invisible unless that range is extremely large, which sharpens the practical conditions for testing the mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper argues that large-scale white noise (LSWN) is a generic and inevitable consequence of nonlinear mode coupling in local PDE systems with sub-Poissonian initial conditions. It develops a perturbative framework—the leading-order Born approximation (LOBA)—for computing the LSWN amplitude, specializing to self-similar systems with sound, hyper-local systems, and planar Newtonian cosmology. The authors validate the framework with exact planar solutions and simulations. They then apply the framework to cosmology, claiming that the non-observation of LSWN on the Hubble scale precludes extrapolating the primordial power law below a comoving ~1 pc scale, or equivalently requires spectral running α_s ≲ −0.015. The paper also discusses 'cosmic confusion,' a No-No-Scale Theorem, and related phenomena in other fields.

Significance. If the central claims are correct, this is a significant conceptual contribution: it identifies a universal mechanism by which small-scale nonlinearities contaminate the largest observable scales, and it turns the absence of large-scale white noise into a quantitative probe of very small-scale early-universe physics. The mathematical development in §II–IV is explicit and is backed by exact planar solutions (Eq. 155) and numerical simulations (Fig. 1). The paper also makes a falsifiable prediction (cutoff scale or spectral running). However, the quantitative cosmological conclusion depends critically on an unknown kernel W_+ for the relativistic variable Δρ, which is not computed in this manuscript but deferred to unpublished companions. Thus the significance is real but currently conditional; the central astrophysical bound is not yet established by the paper itself.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §V.E.1, Eqs. (181)–(184)] The headline quantitative result—the 1 pc cutoff or α_s ≲ −0.015—is not derived in this manuscript. The LSWN amplitude is proportional to W_+^2, and §V.F explicitly reduces the GR nonlinear dynamics to 'one unknown number W+' and defers its computation to the unpublished companion [6]. The mapping from W_+ to k_cut is then made through heuristic estimates such as Eq. (181) with no concrete numerical coefficient derived from a relativistic EoM. The paper itself calls the numerology 'rough' and states the extrapolation 'may or may not be valid' (§I.C). The abstract's unconditional 'precludes' is therefore not supported by the derived content. The authors should either include the W_+ computation for Δρ or materially qualify the abstract and §V.E claims as conditional on the companion paper.
  2. [§V.C, Eq. (172); Table III; §III.B] The application to cosmology hinges on the assertion that the 'kurvature density' Δρ is a guiding variable whose radiation-era EoM has a quadratic, non-conservative nonlinearity with W_+ of order unity. This is not established. LSWN is representation-dependent (§II.A.4, §III.B), and the only fully worked radiation-era analogue—planar Newtonian cosmology—has a conservative variable d with W_+(d)=0 (Table III). The paper argues in §V.F that 'it is likely' nonlinearities become relic, but no EoM or W_+ value for Δρ is given. Without a derivation or at least a well-posed calculation of W_+ for Δρ, the central claim that the observed curvature power spectrum inevitably acquires LSWN is an assumption rather than a result. This is load-bearing and needs to be addressed, either by including the computation or by clearly marking the cosmological section as speculative/conditional.
  3. [§II.B.5, §VII, and §V] The summary statement that 'any non-linear, non-conservative system with sub-Poissonian initial conditions will generate a universal white-noise contribution' is too broad and conflicts with the paper's own caveats. §II.A.4 and §III.B show that non-linear changes of variable (deformations) can suppress W_+ to zero (e.g., Eq. 148), and §II.A.2 identifies the conservative exception. The 'inevitability' is therefore representation-dependent and applies only to a chosen guiding variable with a non-conservative leading-order nonlinearity. The manuscript should state the theorem with these qualifications; otherwise the abstract and synopsis overreach.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and §I.C] Typos: 'early early universe' should be 'early universe'; 'komoving' should be 'comoving'.
  2. [§IV.A] '2 en order' should be '2nd order'.
  3. [§II.B.3] Duplicate 'in in' in the sentence about the secular term.
  4. [References] Reference [8] is listed as 'arXiv:2511.xxxx'—a placeholder. The dependence of the main quantitative claim on unpublished references [5], [6], and [8] should be clearly flagged in the text, and ideally the key results should be included or made available.
  5. [Table II] The table formatting for the Gaussian cutoff polynomials is hard to read; consider separating the columns more clearly or using equation numbers for the polynomials.
  6. [Eq. (146)] There is a stray comma in the integrand: 'dk1, k1^{2(µ+ν−1)+d−1}' should be 'dk1 k1^{2(µ+ν−1)+d−1}'.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Cosmological 1 pc constraint rests on unpublished same-author citations [6]/[8] for W_+ and Δρ; the generic LSWN theorem is self-contained.

  1. self citation load bearing [§V.C, Eq. (172)]
    "As shown in [6], Δρ may be generalized to fully non-linear GR by defining Δρ≡ρ− 1/(24πG)θ^2 (172)... In GR, energy-momentum is locally but not globally conserved, so as expected Δρ does not give rise to any conserved current [6]."

    The cosmological LSWN constraint requires that the observable Δρ obey a local, non-conservative, quadratic PDE with an order-unity LSWN kernel W_+. None of this is derived in the paper; it is imported from [6], an unpublished Fermilab Technical Publication by the same author. Table III shows the analogous variable d has W_+=0 and a conservative EoM, so the existence of LSWN is representation-dependent. Thus the key premise supporting the 1 pc bound is an unverified self-citation, not a first-principles result of this paper.

  2. ansatz smuggled in via citation [§V.F; §V.E.3; §V.E.1]
    "A generic result from [6] is that the kurvature density (gravitational binding/collapse) is seeded by shear... Thus GR non-linear evolution of curvature inhomogeneities in the radiation era reduce to one unknown number W+... This is only a rough estimate; a more precise analysis will be given in a companion work[8]."

    The numerical headline (k_cut ≲ O(1) pc^-1, α_s ≲ -0.015) is presented as a prediction, but the quantitative LSWN amplitude W_+ is taken from [6] and the precise constraint is deferred to [8], both same-author unpublished references. The paper itself labels the extrapolation 'may or may not be valid' (§I.C). If W_+=0, as it is for the d variable in the worked Table III example, the constraint disappears. The headline bound is therefore an assumed input deferred to self-citations, not an output of the derivation chain in this paper.

full rationale

The mathematical core of the paper is self-contained: §II derives, from the mode-mixing of non-linear PDEs, that sub-Poissonian initial conditions generically acquire a white-noise (k^0) large-scale component (e.g. Eqs. 13 and 45). This is a genuine derivation, not a fit, and the generic theorem does not depend on the self-citations. The cosmological application, however, is a different matter. The 1 pc / α_s bounds require that the particular GR observable Δρ be a guiding variable with a local, non-conservative EoM and W_+ of order unity. The paper assigns the definition and properties of Δρ to [6] (unpublished, same author), the shear-seeding formula to [6], and the precise constraints to [8] (placeholder arXiv number by the same authors). The paper explicitly says the GR non-linear dynamics 'reduce to one unknown number W+' and leaves 'the construction of a quantitative model for LSWN to Paper 2.' No parameter is adjusted to make the bound come out—Planck A_s and n_s are external inputs—so this is not a fitted-input circularity. But the central cosmological claim is load-bearing on self-citations that are not independently verifiable in the manuscript, and the paper itself flags the estimate as rough and the extrapolation as 'may or may not be valid.' Hence a moderate circularity score of 4: some self-citation is load-bearing for the cosmological conclusion, while the core LSWN mechanism has independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework introduces no new fitted parameters, but the translation to real GR cosmology effectively leaves the LSWN normalization W_+ as an undetermined O(1) number; the 1 pc constraint is proportional to powers of W_+. The sharp-cutoff vs. running-α_s choices are modeling assumptions that change the numerical bound. The axioms are standard perturbation theory plus domain assumptions about locality of Δρ dynamics, sub-Poissonian pure growing-mode initial conditions, and a quadratic non-conservative leading nonlinearity — the last two are argued but not derived, and the locality of Δρ relies on unpublished [6]. No invented physical entities (particles/forces) are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • W_+ (LSWN kernel normalization for real GR radiation-era hydrodynamics) = not computed; assumed O(1) for the real universe
    The paper reduces GR non-linear evolution in the radiation era to one unknown number W_+ (§V.F), but does not derive it. The 1 pc constraint scales as powers of W_+; if W_+ is small, the constraint shifts or disappears.
  • Small-scale cutoff shape C[k] = model choice (sharp cutoff vs. Gaussian vs. running α_s)
    The numerical bound k_cut ≲ O(1) pc^-1 assumes a sharp cutoff in the minimal model; a running spectral index α_s ≲ -0.015 is an alternative. The exact bound depends on this shape, which is not fixed by the formalism.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Standard background: Fourier analysis, Gaussian random fields, Wick's theorem, Green's function perturbation theory.
    Used throughout §II to derive the LOBA power-spectrum formulas.
  • domain assumption The non-linear evolution of cosmological inhomogeneities can be described by local PDEs in a locally measurable variable Δρ (kurvature density), whose EoM is non-conservative.
    §V.C-D; relies on unpublished companion [6]. The planar example d (Table III) has a conservative EoM with W_+=0 and zero LSWN, so this assumption is load-bearing.
  • domain assumption Initial conditions are sub-Poissonian pure growing modes for the guiding variable at the initial singularity.
    §II.C/III.C; the paper argues this is physically motivated, but it is a choice not determined by the EoMs. 'Protection from LSWN hinges on initial conditions too' (§III.C).
  • ad hoc to paper The leading-order nonlinearity in the cosmological fluid is quadratic and non-conservative for Δρ, with W_+ of order unity.
    Inferred from classical fluid-dynamics analogy (§V.D); the magnitude of W_+ for GR is not computed, and the paper notes a 'suppressed LSWN variable' degeneracy (§III.B).
  • domain assumption No large-scale white noise is observed on scales 10 Mpc–10 Gpc (k_LSWN ≲ 0.1/Gpc).
    §V.E uses this as an empirical input; the precise likelihood analysis is deferred to [8].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large Scale White Noise and Cosmology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7MSR3S6O

@misc{pith2026251113866,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large Scale White Noise and Cosmology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7MSR3S6O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.13866}
}
abstract

The generation of white noise on large scales is a generic property of the dynamics of physical systems described by local non-linear partial differential equations. Non-linearities prevent the small scale dynamics from being erased by smoothing. Unresolved small scale dynamics act as an uncorrelated (white or Poissonian) noise (seemingly stochastic but actually deterministic) contribution to large scale dynamics. This white noise exists even when the dynamics is very nearly linear. In cases where the power spectrum is sub-Poissonian on large scales, this noise will dominate on the largest scale power no matter the amplitude of the inhomogeneities. Such is the case in the standard model of cosmology, where the primordial density power spectrum is expected to have an almost Harrison-Zel'dovich, $P[k]\sim k$, spectrum on a much broader range of scales than can be observed. Even though linear gravitational evolution dominates non-linear corrections by a factor $\sim10^5$, the non-observation of white noise on the Hubble scale precludes the extrapolation of this power law below the comoving $1\,$pc scale. More generally, observation or non-observation of large scale white noise provides a powerful probe of the universe on very small scales in the early early universe. Gravitational radiation, phase transitions, vorticity, and running of the spectral index are all phenomena that can be probed with large scale white noise. Large scale white noise is a non-optional feature of all cosmological models but one which has not heretofore been appreciated.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.13866 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Evolution of dust inhomogeneities in Lagrangian coordinates using the analytic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: For a range of times parameterized by the sound horizon, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p063_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Not R Kurvature: Beating Large-Scale White Noise

    astro-ph.CO 2026-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Kurvature's large-scale white noise is confined to extrinsic shear and expansion; the curvature mode R receives no infrared-divergent contribution from hard-hard modes, invalidating the BIS-II CMB prediction.

  2. Gravitational Waves as a Source of Large-Scale White Noise: New Constraints

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A gravitational-wave background produced before z≈10^8 at pulsar-timing-array amplitudes would create observable white noise in the CMB, so such early backgrounds are ruled out.

  3. The Noisy Universe

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An upper limit on large-scale white noise (k_BH ≤ 1.8×10^-13 Mpc^-1 at 99% CL) is converted, via the authors' LOBA formula, into a required small-scale cutoff (≲3 pc^-1) or negative running (α_s ≲ −0.015) of the primo...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [6]

    white noise on large scales

    Definitions In this paper, we consider partial differential equations (PDEs) for a quantityq(t, ⃗ x), i.e. one real dependent variableqwhich is a function of a temporal coordinatetand addimensional Euclidean spatial coordinates⃗ x={x 1,· · ·, xd} ∈Rd. Allowing for arbitrarydadds little complexity. Spatial integral are Z dd⃗ x f(⃗ x)≡ Z ∞ −∞ dx1 · · · Z ∞ ...

  2. [1]

    We feel this is conservative and justified for predictions of the CMBR since most of the curvature fluctuations during this epoch are produced well before matter-radiation equality

    Modeling Extensions So far, we have only considered LSWN generated in the radiation era. We feel this is conservative and justified for predictions of the CMBR since most of the curvature fluctuations during this epoch are produced well before matter-radiation equality. During the matter era, as suggested by the planar dust models of §IVB, the non-lineari...

  3. [2]

    Since the observed power spectrum does not have a white noise spectral slopens ̸= 0, we can only conclude that the measuredAs andn s given in Eq

    Cutoff Model A minimal model for the primordial power spectrum is that it is a power law with a cutoff k∼k cut. Since the observed power spectrum does not have a white noise spectral slopens ̸= 0, we can only conclude that the measuredAs andn s given in Eq. (175) are the amplitude and slope of the primordial spectrum. If the cutoff is sharp, then one can ...

  4. [3]

    Furthermore, in the context of inhomogeneities produced 72 during inflation, one expects a near but not exactly constant spectral index

    Running Model A power law power spectrum is assumed by theΛCDM model but, as noted above, is not expected to extend to all scales. Furthermore, in the context of inhomogeneities produced 72 during inflation, one expects a near but not exactly constant spectral index. This is usually expressed as an expanded model for the power spectrum ∆2 R[k] =A s k k0 n...

  5. [4]

    The large amplitude of cosmological LSWN is largely to do with the fact that the cosmological fluid is unstable to gravitational collapse on scales above the sound horizon

    Non-Minimal Models It could be that the LSWN receives contributions from processes other than acoustic os- cillations. The large amplitude of cosmological LSWN is largely to do with the fact that the cosmological fluid is unstable to gravitational collapse on scales above the sound horizon. Any process that gives rise to inhomogeneities with large wavelen...

  6. [5]

    down conversion

    Heretical Models Implicit in our study of acoustic waves was that the spectrum of inhomogeneities on observed scales,∼10 Mpcto10 Gpc, is primordial rather than purely the result of non-linearities. One usually presumes it to be the remnant of inflationary quantum fluctuations. The argument that it is not caused by non-linearities is that the measured spec...

    2021

  7. [7]

    knee" in M[φ]). In no case is the exponent smaller forφ≪1than forφ≪1(producing an

    Notational Simplification For 2-point statistics of leading ordermnon-linearities ne will need to manipulate two sets ofmwavenumbers. We compactly denote these manipulations by making the substitutions ⃗k1,· · ·,⃗km →K, ⃗k′ 1,· · ·,⃗k′ m →K ′ , mX i=1 ⃗ki → ⃗K , mX i=1 ⃗k′ i → ⃗K ′ , Z ddk1 (2π)d/2 · · · Z ddkm (2π)d/2 f(⃗k1,· · ·,⃗km)→ Z dmKf(K) Z ddk′ 1...

  8. [8]

    P. J. E. Peebles,Physical Cosmology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1971)

    1971

Show all 27 references
  1. [9]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society160, 1P (1972)

    1972

  2. [10]

    P. J. E. Peebles,The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe (Princeton University Press, Prince- ton, NJ, 1980)

    1980

  3. [11]

    Weinberg,Cosmology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2008)

    S. Weinberg,Cosmology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2008)

    2008

  4. [12]

    Barenboim, A

    G. Barenboim, A. Ireland, and A. Stebbins (2026), in preperation

    2026

  5. [13]

    Stebbins (2025), fermilab Technical Publication

    A. Stebbins (2025), fermilab Technical Publication

    2025

  6. [14]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Barenboim, A

    G. Barenboim, A. Ireland, and A. Stebbins, arXiv preprint (2025), arXiv:2511.xxxx

    2025

  8. [16]

    G. L. Eyink and K. R. Sreenivasan, Reviews of Modern Physics78, 87 (2006)

    2006

  9. [17]

    G. L. Eyink, Physica D99, 226 (1996)

    1996

  10. [18]

    G. K. Batchelor,An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, 1967)

    1967

  11. [19]

    Fjørtoft, Tellus5, 225 (1953)

    R. Fjørtoft, Tellus5, 225 (1953)

    1953

  12. [20]

    Lindborg and A

    E. Lindborg and A. Nordmark, Journal of Fluid Mechanics933, A60 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Nazarenko,Wave Turbulence (Springer, Berlin, 2011)

    S. Nazarenko,Wave Turbulence (Springer, Berlin, 2011)

    2011

  14. [22]

    Galtier, S

    S. Galtier, S. Nazarenko, A. C. Newell, and A. Pouquet, Journal of Plasma Physics63, 447 (2000)

    2000

  15. [23]

    A. C. Newell and B. Rumpf, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics43, 59 (2011)

    2011

  16. [24]

    Falkovich and K

    G. Falkovich and K. R. Sreenivasan, Physics Today59, 24 (2006)

    2006

  17. [25]

    Frisch,Turbulence: The Legacy of A.N

    U. Frisch,Turbulence: The Legacy of A.N. Kolmogorov (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995)

    1995

  18. [26]

    G. P. Agrawal,Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Academic Press, San Diego, 2001)

    2001

  19. [27]

    Cohen,Time-Frequency Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1989)

    L. Cohen,Time-Frequency Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1989). 90

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.