Topological transition in spectrum of skyrmion crystal with uniaxial anisotropy

D. A. Bedyaev; D. N. Aristov; V. E. Timofeev

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 38 references

Topological transition in spectrum of skyrmion crystal with uniaxial anisotropy

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The topological transition in the skyrmion-crystal magnon spectrum survives in the anisotropy range −0.4 ≲ a ≲ 0.2, with the closing field increasing from easy-axis to easy-plane anisotropy.

desk verdict Useful incremental extension of the authors' own a=0 topological-transition result to nonzero uniaxial anisotropy, with a plausible but not independently auditable b_tt(a) line. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.16359 v1 pith:SCVTBU22 submitted 2025-11-20 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall

V. E. Timofeev , D. A. Bedyaev , D. N. Aristov This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hall

keywords skyrmioncrystalmagnonbandstructuretopologicaltransitionuniaxialanisotropyBerrycurvatureDzyaloshinskii-Moriyainteractionbreathingmodecounter-clockwise

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether a topological transition previously found in the magnon spectrum of a skyrmion crystal at zero anisotropy survives when uniaxial anisotropy is added. Building the skyrmion crystal from a sum of single-skyrmion trial profiles with a 2π domain-wall shape and computing the low-energy magnon bands, the authors identify a curve b_tt(a) in the anisotropy–field plane along which the breathing and counter-clockwise modes cross at the Brillouin-zone center. The transition exists over a moderate range of anisotropy, moves to higher fields with easy-plane anisotropy and lower fields with easy-axis anisotropy, and is marked by a sign change in the Berry curvature of the two bands. This matters because it predicts where the as-yet-unobserved topological transition should appear in real skyrmion materials and why common materials have shown only gap narrowing.

What carries the argument

The central object is the linear spin-wave Hamiltonian built around the static skyrmion crystal in stereographic projection: a Bogoliubov-type operator with a vector potential A and potentials U and V, whose eigenproblem yields the magnon Bloch bands. The decisive diagnostic is the uniform susceptibility tensor: its longitudinal component isolates the breathing mode, while its transverse and antisymmetric components isolate the counter-clockwise mode. Tracing those resonances across the parameter plane locates the crossing line b_tt(a), and the Berry curvature of each Bloch band records whether the band topology changes at the crossing.

What would settle it

Solve the full Landau-Lifshitz equations for a relaxed skyrmion crystal (no shape ansatz) at a representative anisotropy such as a = −0.03 and compute the Br and CCW magnon modes and their Berry curvature: if the gap does not close and reopen with opposite curvature signs near b ≈ 0.61, the transition line is an artifact of the ansatz. Experimentally, microwave absorption in a film with continuously tunable uniaxial anisotropy across the range −0.4 ≲ a ≲ 0.2 would show the two resonances coalescing at the predicted field only if the transition is real.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a thin ferromagnetic film with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, uniaxial anisotropy, and perpendicular magnetic field, the topological transition of the skyrmion-crystal magnon spectrum is not destroyed by moderate anisotropy. Across −0.4 ≲ a ≲ 0.2 there is a curve b_tt(a), monotonically increasing with a, on which the breathing and counter-clockwise modes at the Brillouin-zone center have equal frequency; passing through the curve closes and reopens the gap and flips the sign of the Berry curvature of each band. The transition field is higher in the easy-plane side of the phase diagram and lower in the easy-axis side.

Load-bearing premise

The findings assume the static skyrmion crystal's spin texture is captured accurately by a simple trial profile with only three free parameters; if that trial shape distorts the true texture, the predicted transition line could shift or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In the parameter window −0.4 ≲ a ≲ 0.2 the Br–CCW gap closes and reopens at a magnetic field b_tt(a) that increases monotonically with a.
The gap closing is accompanied by a sign change of the Berry curvature of the Br and CCW bands, so the transition changes the topological character of these magnon branches.
In the easy-plane anisotropy domain the transition sits at higher fields, which the paper argues explains why dipole-dominated bulk skyrmion materials show only a tendency of the Br and CCW modes to converge without the gap reopening.
In the easy-axis domain the transition sits at lower fields, consistent with systems where the observed ordering of Br and CCW resonances is inverted.
The transition can be located through resonances in the uniform susceptibility, giving a concrete experimental observable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

An implication the paper leaves implicit: if the 2π-domain-wall trial profile is the main source of error, a fully relaxed micromagnetic texture will likely shift the endpoints of the b_tt(a) line but should preserve its existence, because the crossing is tied to the lowest-energy symmetry classes rather than to fine details of the profile.
The paper itself notes that single-band Berry curvature becomes ill-defined where trivial flat bands intersect dispersive bands and that a multiband Berry connection would be needed there; the claimed sign change is therefore established only in regions where the Br and CCW bands are isolated from other branches.
The abrupt Br–CCW resonance-order change reported in the low-temperature skyrmion phase of one chiral insulator, attributed in earlier work to cubic-anisotropy-induced hybridization with an octupole mode, may be a close relative of this transition; a direct comparison could separate an intrinsic topological crossing from a hybridization shift.
The endpoint near a ≈ 0.2, where skyrmion shape changes most with anisotropy, is the least robust part of the phase diagram; a targeted calculation there would test whether the monotonic rise of b_tt(a) continues.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The genuinely new thing here is the numerical sweep over uniaxial anisotropy: the claim that the Br/CCW gap-closing transition survives in the window −0.4 ≲ a ≲ 0.2, with the transition field b_tt(a) rising monotonically as a goes from easy-axis to easy-plane. That line is not in the cited literature, and if correct it gives experimenters a concrete target window and explains why B20 compounds (effective easy-plane anisotropy) sit above the transition field. The experimental discussion is sensible and not overblown.

What the paper does well: it is internally consistent, the static ansatz is benchmarked against independent phase-diagram calculations [20–22], and the susceptibility-based branch identification is a reasonable way to track the modes even when bands get dense. The paper is honest about the limitation that Berry curvature per band becomes problematic where bands intersect, though it does not say whether that affects the transition region itself.

Soft spots, in order of seriousness. First, the central quantitative claim cannot be checked from the text: the magnon Hamiltonian's U, V, A are only cited to [11], so the spectrum and the b_tt(a) line rest on previous work the reader would have to reproduce. Second, the static texture is a constrained three-parameter ansatz (d, R, δ) with a fixed 2π domain-wall profile; the agreement with [20–22] validates energies and phase boundaries, not the local spin configuration that feeds the magnon gauge potentials. A systematic profile error, especially as the skyrmion shape changes with a, could tilt the b_tt(a) line or shift its endpoints. The paper gives no convergence test against a more flexible trial function or a fully relaxed texture. Third, no code or data is shipped, so the numerical curve is not independently auditable. These are real but not disqualifying; the monotonic shift is plausible and the internal logic is sound.

The citation pattern is heavily self-referential, but the inherited pieces are parameter-free derivations and the new line is a fresh computation, so I do not see disqualifying circularity. I would not call this a breakthrough; it is a routine-extension result with a useful experimental map. The paper deserves a serious referee: the model is standard, the question is well posed, and the claim is falsifiable. A referee should ask for the Hamiltonian matrix elements or a reproducible code, and for a check on the ansatz's sensitivity, but the desk-reject case is weak.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the magnon band structure of a triangular skyrmion crystal (SkX) in a thin ferromagnetic film with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, uniaxial anisotropy, and an external perpendicular magnetic field. Using a stereographic-projection representation and a 2π-domain-wall trial ansatz for the static Skyrme texture, the authors minimize the energy over three parameters (d, R, δ) and then construct a linear spin-wave Hamiltonian from prior work [11]. They identify the crossing of the breathing (Br) and counter-clockwise (CCW) modes at the Brillouin-zone center and associate it with a topological transition. Their central result is the red dashed line b_tt(a) in Fig. 1: the transition field increases monotonically with anisotropy a in the range −0.4 ≲ a ≲ 0.2, lying higher for easy-plane and lower for easy-axis anisotropy. They also claim that the gap closing is accompanied by a Berry-curvature sign change. The paper concludes with a discussion of existing experiments in B20 compounds, thin-film multilayers, and GaV4S8.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a concrete prediction for how uniaxial anisotropy tunes the field at which the topological transition occurs in the SkX magnon spectrum, thereby connecting a theoretically predicted phenomenon to a wider class of materials. The b_tt(a) line is a falsifiable prediction that can in principle be tested by microwave absorption experiments. The main strength of the paper is that it extends the previous a=0 result [15] to finite anisotropy using a method that has been benchmarked in prior work. However, the quantitative central claim depends on approximations whose accuracy is not demonstrated in the manuscript, and the numerical curve is not independently verifiable from the text. The paper is therefore of significant interest but needs additional verification before the result can be considered established.

major comments (3)

[Stereographic projection approach, Eqs. (3)–(5)] The central quantitative result, b_tt(a) in Fig. 1, is derived from a magnon spectrum built on a static SkX texture that is constrained to the 2π-domain-wall trial ansatz (4)–(5), minimized over only three parameters d, R, δ. The claimed agreement with the independent phase diagrams of Refs. [20–22] is not displayed: Fig. 1 shows only the authors' own boundaries, and the statement 'agrees qualitatively and quantitatively' is unsupported. Since ground-state energies and phase boundaries are relatively insensitive to fine details of the spin texture, this validation does not guarantee that the local profile f0(r) — and hence the gauge potentials A and potentials U,V in Eq. (9) — are accurate enough to determine the Br/CCW crossing. The transition line may shift or its slope may change under a more flexible ansatz or a fully relaxed texture. Please provide (i) a direct comparison of phase b
[Semiclassical dynamics, Eq. (9)] The magnon Hamiltonian (9) is fully determined by the functions U, V, and A, which are not given in the text; the paper merely says they are 'rather cumbersome functions' listed in Ref. [11]. A reader cannot audit the numerical spectrum, the crossing condition, or the Berry curvature without these expressions or a reproducible implementation. For a new quantitative phase diagram, the authors should provide the explicit formulas (or a supplementary appendix/code) and describe the numerical solution of Eq. (11) — basis size, number of reciprocal-lattice vectors, and convergence criteria. This is a verifiability issue rather than a correctness claim, but it is load-bearing for the central result.
[Results and Topology, Eqs. (18)–(19)] The paper calls the Br/CCW crossing a topological transition and states that it is 'accompanied by a change in the sign of the Berry curvature' of the two bands. The evidence shown in Fig. 2 is a color plot of the sign of the Berry curvature along a path near the Γ point. A local sign change at a band crossing does not by itself prove a change of the Chern number, which is the topological invariant of interest. The authors should either report the Chern numbers of the Br and CCW bands on both sides of the crossing over the entire Brillouin zone, or explicitly limit the claim to a local Berry-curvature change consistent with the known a=0 transition [15]. Without this, the use of the term 'topological transition' for finite a is not fully supported by the presented evidence.

minor comments (4)

[Introduction] Typo: 'co-called' should be 'so-called'.
[After Eq. (12)] The second reciprocal lattice vector is denoted 'b1' again; it should be 'b2'. Also, the expression should read b2 = (4π/(√3 d)) e_y.
[Fig. 2 caption] The caption contains repeated stray 'k' characters; also specify what path in the Brillouin zone is plotted.
[Fig. 1 / Results] The b_tt(a) curve is only shown graphically. To support the claims of monotonic increase and the range −0.4 ≲ a ≲ 0.2, provide numerical values in a table or in the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: b_tt(a) is computed from the model spectrum, not fitted or defined into existence.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative output—the transition field b_tt(a)—is obtained by numerically solving the Bogoliubov equation (11) for the magnon Hamiltonian (9) at each (a,b), with the static SkX configuration fixed by energy minimization of the ansatz (3)-(5) over only d, R, δ. Nothing in the transition-line construction fits the crossing condition: the ansatz parameters are fixed by ground-state energy, the Hamiltonian functions U,V,A are parameter-free functions of the static texture quoted from the authors' prior work [11] but not containing b_tt, and the Br/CCW labels are read from the susceptibility components (16)-(17) rather than imposed to match the desired curve. The a=0 topological transition of [15] is used as the baseline case of the same computed spectrum, not as an input that determines the anisotropy dependence. The static ansatz is independently checked against the external phase diagrams [20-22], and the experimental discussion is retrospective interpretation rather than a fitted prediction. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The self-citations supply methods and prior baselines, but the central b_tt(a) curve remains an independent model computation; any concern about the 2π domain-wall ansatz is an approximation-accuracy issue, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The report's central claim rests on five assumptions, four of which are sourced from the authors' own prior papers ([11], [15], [23], [24]); none involves fitting constants to data. The only hand-chosen element is the functional form of the static trial state (three variational parameters), which constrains the texture around which the entire magnon calculation is built. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

SkX trial-state parameters (d, R, δ) = variational; values energy-minimized per (a, b), not tabulated
The static spin texture — and hence the magnon spectrum — is restricted to a three-parameter 2π-domain-wall ansatz (Eqs. 4-5). The parameters are fixed by energy minimization, so they are not fitted to experimental data; the hand-chosen part is the functional form of the trial state, which limits shape relaxation under anisotropy.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The SkX magnetization is well approximated by the superposition of single-skyrmion stereographic functions, f_multi(r) = Σ_j f1(r − r_j), with the 2π domain-wall profile (Eq. 4).
Invoked in Model section ('stereographic function of multi-skyrmion configuration can be well approximated by a sum... [23, 24]'). Load-bearing: the entire static texture and hence the magnon spectrum are built on it. Supported by the authors' own prior papers and the phase-boundary comparison, but no texture-level validation against an unconstrained relaxation is cited.
domain assumption Linear spin-wave theory — expansion in the small parameter 1/√(2S) around the static saddle point — captures the low-energy modes and their topology.
'We further assume that 1/√(2S) is a small parameter, that allows us to consider a formal expansion.' Standard linear spin-wave assumption; restricts the claim to low energies and to the saturated-magnet regime.
domain assumption The magnon Hamiltonian (9) with its potentials U, V, A is taken as correct from the authors' prior derivation [11].
The potentials are not shown in this paper ('rather cumbersome functions... listed in [11]'). The underlying derivation in [11] is a parameter-free spin-wave expansion, so the inheritance is legitimate, but it makes the present paper's central spectrum unverifiable from the text alone.
domain assumption The Γ-point crossing of the Br and CCW branches is the correct and complete diagnostic of the topological transition, as established for a = 0 in [15].
'We are primarily interested in the topological transition... observed earlier in the absence of anisotropy, a = 0, see [15].' The new claim inherits this diagnostic rather than re-deriving it; the susceptibility analysis (Eqs. 16-17) labels branches but does not independently define the transition.
domain assumption Single-band Berry curvature (18)-(19) remains meaningful across the transition region — the Br/CCW bands do not overlap other bands where they touch.
The paper asserts this positively ('Similar behavior of the Berry curvature is observed throughout the entire range') while conceding that 'if topologically trivial and non-trivial bands intersect, then the calculation of the characteristics of individual bands becomes difficult', deferring multiband curvature, and never stating whether such intersections occur on the transition line.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological transition in spectrum of skyrmion crystal with uniaxial anisotropy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SCVTBU22

@misc{pith2026251116359,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological transition in spectrum of skyrmion crystal with uniaxial anisotropy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SCVTBU22}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.16359}
}

read the original abstract

The band structure of elementary excitations of skyrmion crystal in thin ferromagnetic film with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and uniaxial magnetic anisotropy under external magnetic field is studied. In the absence of anisotropy there is a topological transition in the spectrum of skyrmion crystal: the gap between breathing and counter-clock-wise modes closes, which is accompanied by changes of Berry curvature sign of these bands. In this work we demonstrate that such topological transition exists in some range of the uniaxial anisotropy values. We present a phase diagram showing that the value of the field of topological transition is higher in the easy-plane domain and lower in the easy-axis domain of anisotropy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.16359 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Panels (a)-(e) demonstrate the evolution of Br and CCW bands for small easy-axis anisotropy, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

[11]

V. E. Timofeev and D. N. Aristov, Magnon band struc- ture of skyrmion crystals and stereographic projection approach, Phys. Rev. B105, 024422 (2022)

2022
[15]

V. E. Timofeev, Y. V. Baramygina, and D. N. Aristov, Magnon topological transition in skyrmion crystal, JETP Letters118, 911 (2023)

2023
[1]

Nagaosa and Y

N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nature Nanotechnol- ogy8, 899 (2013)

2013
[2]

A. A. Belavin and A. M. Polyakov, Metastable states of two-dimensional isotropic ferromagnets, JETP Lett.22, 245 (1975)

1975
[3]

A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications, Nature Reviews Materials2, 1 (2017)

2017
[4]

G¨ obel, A

B. G¨ obel, A. Mook, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, The family of topological hall effects for electrons in skyrmion crystals, The European Physical Journal B91, 10.1140/epjb/e2018-90090-0 (2018)

work page doi:10.1140/epjb/e2018-90090-0 2018
[5]

Akazawa, H.-Y

M. Akazawa, H.-Y. Lee, H. Takeda, Y. Fujima, Y. Toku- naga, T.-h. Arima, J. H. Han, and M. Yamashita, Topological thermal hall effect of magnons in magnetic skyrmion lattice, Phys. Rev. Research4, 043085 (2022)

2022
[6]

vortices

A. N. Bogdanov and D. Yablonskii, Thermodynamically stable “vortices” in magnetically ordered crystals. the mixed state of magnets, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz95, 178 (1989)

1989

Show all 38 references

[7]

Bogdanov and A

A. Bogdanov and A. Hubert, Thermodynamically stable magnetic vortex states in magnetic crystals, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials138, 255 (1994)

1994
[8]

Sch¨ utte and M

C. Sch¨ utte and M. Garst, Magnon-skyrmion scattering in chiral magnets, Physical Review B90, 094423 (2014)

2014
[9]

Rold´ an-Molina, A

A. Rold´ an-Molina, A. S. Nunez, and J. Fern´ andez- Rossier, Topological spin waves in the atomic-scale mag- netic skyrmion crystal, New Journal of Physics18, 045015 (2016)

2016
[10]

Garst, J

M. Garst, J. Waizner, and D. Grundler, Collective spin excitations of helices and magnetic skyrmions: review and perspectives of magnonics in non-centrosymmetric magnets, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics50, 293002 (2017)

2017
[12]

Weber, D

T. Weber, D. M. Fobes, J. Waizner, P. Steffens, G. S. Tucker, M. B¨ ohm, L. Beddrich, C. Franz, H. Gabold, R. Bewley, D. Voneshen, M. Skoulatos, R. Georgii, G. Ehlers, A. Bauer, C. Pfleiderer, P. B¨ oni, M. Janoschek, and M. Garst, Topological magnon band structure of emergent...

2022
[13]

Ghader and B

D. Ghader and B. Jabakhanji, Momentum-space theory for topological magnons in two-dimensional ferromag- netic skyrmion lattices, Physical Review B110, 184409 (2024)

2024
[14]

S. A. D ´ ıaz, T. Hirosawa, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Chiral magnonic edge states in ferromagnetic skyrmion crystals controlled by magnetic fields, Physical Review Research 2, 013231 (2020)

2020
[16]

Onose, Y

Y. Onose, Y. Okamura, S. Seki, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Observation of magnetic excitations of skyrmion crystal in a helimagnetic InsulatorCu2oseo3, Physical Review Letters109, 037603 (2012)

2012
[17]

Schwarze, J

T. Schwarze, J. Waizner, M. Garst, A. Bauer, I. Stasinopoulos, H. Berger, C. Pfleiderer, and D. Grundler, Universal helimagnon and skyrmion exci- tations in metallic, semiconducting and insulating chi- ral magnets, Nature Materials14, 478 (2015)

2015
[18]

Okamura, F

Y. Okamura, F. Kagawa, M. Mochizuki, M. Kub- 6 ota, S. Seki, S. Ishiwata, M. Kawasaki, Y. Onose, and Y. Tokura, Microwave magnetoelectric effect via skyrmion resonance modes in a helimagnetic multiferroic, Nature Communications4, 1 (2013)

2013
[19]

Takagi, M

R. Takagi, M. Garst, J. Sahliger, C. H. Back, Y. Tokura, and S. Seki, Hybridized magnon modes in the quenched skyrmion crystal, Phys. Rev. B104, 144410 (2021)

2021
[20]

Banerjee, J

S. Banerjee, J. Rowland, O. Erten, and M. Randeria, En- hanced stability of skyrmions in two-dimensional chiral magnets with rashba spin-orbit coupling, Physical Re- view X4, 031045 (2014)

2014
[21]

S.-Z. Lin, A. Saxena, and C. D. Batista, Skyrmion frac- tionalization and merons in chiral magnets with easy- plane anisotropy, Physical Review B91, 224407 (2015)

2015
[22]

G¨ ung¨ ord¨ u, R

U. G¨ ung¨ ord¨ u, R. Nepal, O. A. Tretiakov, K. Be- lashchenko, and A. A. Kovalev, Stability of skyrmion lattices and symmetries of quasi-two-dimensional chiral magnets, Physical Review B93, 064428 (2016)

2016
[23]

V. E. Timofeev, A. O. Sorokin, and D. N. Aristov, To- wards an effective theory of skyrmion crystals, JETP Let- ters109, 207 (2019)

2019
[24]

V. E. Timofeev, A. O. Sorokin, and D. N. Aristov, Triple helix versus skyrmion lattice in two-dimensional noncen- trosymmetric magnets, Physical Review B103, 094402 (2021)

2021
[25]

Romming, A

N. Romming, A. Kubetzka, C. Hanneken, K. von Bergmann, and R. Wiesendanger, Field-dependent size and shape of single magnetic skyrmions, Physical Review Letters114, 177203 (2015)

2015
[26]

B¨ uttner, I

F. B¨ uttner, I. Lemesh, and G. S. D. Beach, Theory of isolated magnetic skyrmions: From fundamentals to room temperature applications, Scientific Reports8, 10.1038/s41598-018-22242-8 (2018)

2018 doi
[27]

K. L. Metlov, Vortex mechanics in planar nanomagnets, Physical Review B88, 014427 (2013)

2013
[28]

Rajaraman,Solitons and instantons(North Holland,Amsterdam-New York-Oxford, 1982)

R. Rajaraman,Solitons and instantons(North Holland,Amsterdam-New York-Oxford, 1982)

1982
[29]

V. A. Rubakov,Classical Theory of Gauge Fields (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2002)

2002
[30]

V. E. Timofeev and D. N. Aristov, Dynamic susceptibil- ity of skyrmion crystal, JETP Letters117, 676 (2023)

2023
[31]

Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

D. Vanderbilt,Berry Phases in Electronic Structure Theory: Electric Polarization, Orbital Magnetization and Topological Insulators(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

2018
[32]

S. Seki, M. Garst, J. Waizner, R. Takagi, N. D. Khanh, Y. Okamura, K. Kondou, F. Kagawa, Y. Otani, and Y. Tokura, Propagation dynamics of spin excitations along skyrmion strings, Nature Communications11, 1 (2020)

2020
[33]

P. Che, R. Ciola, M. Garst, V. Kravchuk, P. R. Baral, A. Magrez, H. Berger, T. Sch¨ onenberger, H. M. Rønnow, and D. Grundler, Short-wave magnons with multipole spin precession detected in the topological bands of a skyrmion lattice, Communications Materials 6, 10.1038/s43246-...

2025 doi
[34]

V. L. Zhang, C. G. Hou, K. Di, H. S. Lim, S. C. Ng, S. D. Pollard, H. Yang, and M. H. Kuok, Eigenmodes of n´ eel skyrmions in ultrathin magnetic films, AIP Advances7, 055212 (2017)

2017
[35]

Satywali, V

B. Satywali, V. P. Kravchuk, L. Pan, M. Raju, S. He, F. Ma, A. P. Petrovi´ c, M. Garst, and C. Panagopou- los, Microwave resonances of magnetic skyrmions in thin film multilayers, Nature Communications12, 10.1038/s41467-021-22220-1 (2021)

2021 doi
[36]

Srivastava, Y

T. Srivastava, Y. Sassi, F. Ajejas, A. Vecchiola, I. Ngouagnia Yemeli, H. Hurdequint, K. Bouzehouane, N. Reyren, V. Cros, T. Devolder, J.-V. Kim, and G. de Loubens, Resonant dynamics of three-dimensional skyrmionic textures in thin film multilayers, APL Mate- rials11, 10.1063/...

2023 doi
[37]

Ehlers, I

D. Ehlers, I. Stasinopoulos, V. Tsurkan, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, T. Feh´ er, A. Leonov, I. K´ ezsm´ arki, D. Grundler, and A. Loidl, Skyrmion dynamics under uniaxial anisotropy, Physical Review B94, 014406 (2016)

2016
[38]

Aqeel, J

A. Aqeel, J. Sahliger, T. Taniguchi, S. M¨ andl, D. Mettus, H. Berger, A. Bauer, M. Garst, C. Pfleiderer, and C. H. Back, Microwave spectroscopy of the low-temperature skyrmion state in cu2oseo3, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 017202 (2021)

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [11]

V. E. Timofeev and D. N. Aristov, Magnon band struc- ture of skyrmion crystals and stereographic projection approach, Phys. Rev. B105, 024422 (2022)

2022

[2] [15]

V. E. Timofeev, Y. V. Baramygina, and D. N. Aristov, Magnon topological transition in skyrmion crystal, JETP Letters118, 911 (2023)

2023

[3] [1]

Nagaosa and Y

N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nature Nanotechnol- ogy8, 899 (2013)

2013

[4] [2]

A. A. Belavin and A. M. Polyakov, Metastable states of two-dimensional isotropic ferromagnets, JETP Lett.22, 245 (1975)

1975

[5] [3]

A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications, Nature Reviews Materials2, 1 (2017)

2017

[6] [4]

G¨ obel, A

B. G¨ obel, A. Mook, J. Henk, and I. Mertig, The family of topological hall effects for electrons in skyrmion crystals, The European Physical Journal B91, 10.1140/epjb/e2018-90090-0 (2018)

work page doi:10.1140/epjb/e2018-90090-0 2018

[7] [5]

Akazawa, H.-Y

M. Akazawa, H.-Y. Lee, H. Takeda, Y. Fujima, Y. Toku- naga, T.-h. Arima, J. H. Han, and M. Yamashita, Topological thermal hall effect of magnons in magnetic skyrmion lattice, Phys. Rev. Research4, 043085 (2022)

2022

[8] [6]

vortices

A. N. Bogdanov and D. Yablonskii, Thermodynamically stable “vortices” in magnetically ordered crystals. the mixed state of magnets, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz95, 178 (1989)

1989