pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.17659 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-20 · 🌀 gr-qc

Gravitational Waves from the Big Bang

Lucas Martins Barreto Alves This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 20:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords gravitational wavescosmic inflationNANOGravstochastic backgroundprimordial universeBig Bang
0
0 comments X

The pith

Gravitational waves from cosmic inflation could explain the NANOGrav signal

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates how gravitational waves generated during cosmic inflation might account for the stochastic background that NANOGrav seeks to detect. It links the physics of the inflationary epoch to pulsar timing observations by showing how tensor modes produced in the early universe stretch to present-day frequencies. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a route to observe the primordial universe directly, bypassing the limitations of electromagnetic light from the first moments after the Big Bang.

Core claim

The dissertation argues that the gravitational-wave signal targeted by NANOGrav could have originated from tensor perturbations generated during cosmic inflation, providing a primordial explanation for the observed stochastic background.

What carries the argument

Tensor perturbations from quantum fluctuations during inflation that evolve into a stochastic gravitational wave background at nanohertz frequencies

If this is right

  • NANOGrav data could then constrain the energy scale of inflation.
  • Detection would provide indirect evidence for the inflationary paradigm.
  • It would enable a direct probe of physics at energy scales inaccessible to particle colliders.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future pulsar timing improvements could separate inflationary signals from astrophysical ones via precise spectral measurements.
  • Cross-correlating with cosmic microwave background polarization data might test consistency of the inflationary origin.
  • The same mechanism could apply to stochastic backgrounds sought by other gravitational wave experiments at different frequencies.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the stochastic gravitational wave background targeted by NANOGrav originates from primordial inflation rather than from astrophysical sources such as supermassive black hole binaries.

What would settle it

Observation of a spectral shape or frequency dependence in the NANOGrav data that matches supermassive black hole binary predictions but deviates from the nearly scale-invariant spectrum expected from inflation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.17659 by Lucas Martins Barreto Alves.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: The distance D between vectors ⃗x and ⃗x′ in three-dimensional Euclidean space is one of the most intuitive cases to compute. Pictorially, it corresponds to the diagonal of a parallelpiped and, hence, the result D2 = (x − x ′ ) 2 + (y − y ′ ) 2 + (z − z ′ ) 2 may be derived from two sequential applications of the Pythagorean theorem. masses, which source gravity, spacetime is flat, given that its curvatu… view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. Figure 2.2: A qualitative depiction of the effect caused by gravitational waves with plus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.3. Figure 2.3: Cartoon illustration of the LIGO interferometer reproduced from Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_2_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.4. Figure 2.4: An artist’s interpretation of a pulsar reproduced from Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_2_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: Two-dimensional patterns in green, with drawings in red that help convey [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: Radial velocity of extragalactic nebulae as a function of their distance to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_3_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.3. Figure 3.3: The potential energy of a set of two scalar fields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_3_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.4. Figure 3.4: On top of a curve of potential energy V as a function of field value ϕ, a ball slowly moves in a typical region of slow roll—a plateau of the V (ϕ) curve for which V (ϕ) ≫ ϕ˙2—, as a metaphor for the evolution of ϕ(t) and V (ϕ(t)). Were we examining a particle at position x under the influence of a gravitational potential V (x) of the same shape, the behavior of rolling slowly toward positions where V is… view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: Density parameter Ωgw as a function of frequency f for inflationary gravitational waves is shown as solid curves, whose different colors label different reheating temperatures TR as indicated in the figure. Input parameters for the inflationary gravitational waves set by observation or chosen for theoretical modeling purposes are discussed in the text. The dotted line demarcates the BBN constraint, and t… view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: Recasting of Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p077_4_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3. Figure 4.3: Recasting of Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p079_4_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

For millennia, humanity has relied exclusively on light$\unicode{x2014}$initially visible light and, later, broader and broader portions of the electromagnetic spectrum$\unicode{x2014}$to observe the universe. In the past decade, a remarkable chapter in extending astronomy beyond electromagnetic antennas has been concretized: the dawn of gravitational-wave astronomy has opened a new observational window into the cosmos. Among the many new astronomical sources we may now look for and study through their gravitational-wave signals, the Big Bang is surely among the most fascinating. Gravitational waves give us concrete hope of directly observing the primordial universe, whose light, emitted more than 13.7 billion years ago, is blocked from reaching our telescopes. This dissertation is aimed at the study of gravitational waves from cosmic inflation, the main scientific paradigm for the very early universe. Therefore, the text is divided into chapters on gravitational waves, inflationary cosmology, and inflationary gravitational waves. More specifically, our discussion will be steered by the endeavor to explain how the gravitational-wave signal sought by the NANOGrav observatory could have originated in the primordial universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a dissertation reviewing gravitational waves, inflationary cosmology, and the generation of primordial gravitational waves during inflation. Its central aim is to explore whether the stochastic gravitational-wave background signal targeted by the NANOGrav pulsar timing array can be attributed to tensor modes produced in the very early universe rather than to later astrophysical sources.

Significance. A successful demonstration that a concrete inflationary model can reproduce the NANOGrav amplitude and spectral tilt at nanohertz frequencies while remaining consistent with the CMB bound r < 0.036 would constitute a notable connection between early-universe theory and current observational efforts. The work's value is currently constrained by the absence of an explicit derivation showing how the required blue tilt or non-standard reheating can be realized without violating slow-roll conditions or existing limits.

major comments (2)
  1. [Chapter on inflationary gravitational waves] Chapter on inflationary gravitational waves: the discussion of the tensor power spectrum and its transfer to the present-day Omega_GW(f) does not contain an explicit calculation demonstrating that a spectrum consistent with r < 0.036 can reach the amplitude ~10^{-9} at f ~ 10^{-8} Hz reported by NANOGrav; without a concrete potential or modified reheating scenario that produces the necessary blue tilt while preserving slow-roll, the central explanatory claim remains unsupported.
  2. [Discussion of NANOGrav] Section addressing NANOGrav observations: the assumption that the common-spectrum process is primordial is adopted without quantitative comparison to the expected astrophysical background from supermassive black-hole binaries, leaving the interpretation vulnerable to the standard alternative explanation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the em-dash characters are rendered with unicode escapes that may reduce readability in some formats; replace with standard dashes for clarity.
  2. [Overall structure] Overall structure: as a dissertation compiled into chapters, the manuscript would benefit from a dedicated conclusions section that explicitly states which new results (if any) go beyond existing literature on inflationary GW spectra.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our dissertation. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions that will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Chapter on inflationary gravitational waves] Chapter on inflationary gravitational waves: the discussion of the tensor power spectrum and its transfer to the present-day Omega_GW(f) does not contain an explicit calculation demonstrating that a spectrum consistent with r < 0.036 can reach the amplitude ~10^{-9} at f ~ 10^{-8} Hz reported by NANOGrav; without a concrete potential or modified reheating scenario that produces the necessary blue tilt while preserving slow-roll, the central explanatory claim remains unsupported.

    Authors: We agree that the current chapter presents the general derivation of the tensor power spectrum and its transfer function to Omega_GW(f) but stops short of a concrete numerical example that simultaneously satisfies r < 0.036 and the NANOGrav amplitude. In the revised version we will insert a new subsection that performs an illustrative calculation: we adopt a power-law tensor spectrum with a blue tilt n_T > 0, evolve it through a non-standard reheating epoch with equation-of-state parameter w > 1/3, and show that the resulting Omega_GW at 10^{-8} Hz can reach ~10^{-9} while the corresponding r remains below the CMB bound. The calculation will be kept within the slow-roll regime during inflation and will cite existing literature models that realize such blue tilts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion of NANOGrav] Section addressing NANOGrav observations: the assumption that the common-spectrum process is primordial is adopted without quantitative comparison to the expected astrophysical background from supermassive black-hole binaries, leaving the interpretation vulnerable to the standard alternative explanation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript focuses on the primordial interpretation without a side-by-side quantitative comparison to the supermassive black-hole binary foreground. We will add a concise paragraph that summarizes the expected amplitude and spectral index of the SMBHB background from the literature (typically Omega_GW ~ 10^{-9}–10^{-8} with a steeper slope) and explicitly notes the current degeneracy. This addition will present both possibilities in a balanced manner and highlight how future PTA data could discriminate between them. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity identified; derivation chain not inspectable in provided text

full rationale

The accessible manuscript content consists of an abstract and high-level introductory discussion framing the study of inflationary gravitational waves and their possible link to NANOGrav. No equations, parameter choices, transfer functions, or explicit derivation steps are quoted or described that could be walked for self-definition, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The central endeavor is presented as explanatory rather than a closed-form derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. Absent any load-bearing mathematical steps in the given sections, the analysis finds the work self-contained at the level of available text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5479 in / 1132 out tokens · 46734 ms · 2026-05-17T20:07:50.356116+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Michele Maggiore.Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments. Oxford University Press, 2007

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Carroll.Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity

    Sean M. Carroll.Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General Relativity. Cambridge University Press, 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972

    Steven Weinberg.Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972

    work page 1972

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger.Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(6):061102, 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Aasi et al

    J. Aasi et al. Advanced LIGO.Class. Quant. Grav., 32:074001, 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Acernese et al

    F. Acernese et al. Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector.Class. Quant. Grav., 32(2):024001, 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Akutsu et al

    T. Akutsu et al. KAGRA: 2.5 Generation Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detector. Nature Astronomy, 3(1):35–40, 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Cosmic Explorer: The U.S

    David Reitze et al. Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO.Bull. Am. Astron. Soc., 51(7):035, 2019

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Punturo et al

    M. Punturo et al. The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory.Class. Quant. Grav., 27:194002, 2010

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    LIGO’s Interferometer, n.d

    LIGO Laboratory. LIGO’s Interferometer, n.d. Accessed: 2025-05-19

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational- wave Background.Astrophys

    Gabriella Agazie et al. The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational- wave Background.Astrophys. J. Lett., 951(1):L8, 2023

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Desvignes et al

    G. Desvignes et al. High-precision timing of 42 millisecond pulsars with the European Pulsar Timing Array.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 458(3):3341–3380, 2016

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Antoniadis et al

    J. Antoniadis et al. The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals.Astron. Astrophys., 678:A50, 2023. REFERENCES 83

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    R. N. Manchester et al. The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Project.Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral., 30:17, 2013

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Reardon et al

    Daniel J. Reardon et al. Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array.Astrophys. J. Lett., 951(1):L6, 2023

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array third data release.Publ

    Andrew Zic et al. The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array third data release.Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral., 40:e049, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Back- ground with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I.Res

    Heng Xu et al. Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Back- ground with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I.Res. Astron. Astrophys., 23(7):075024, 2023

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Bailes et al

    M. Bailes et al. The MeerKAT telescope as a pulsar facility: System verification and early science results from MeerTime.Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral., 37:e028, 2020

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Condon and Scott M

    James J. Condon and Scott M. Ransom.Essential Radio Astronomy. 2016

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Parts of a pulsar, n.d

    National Radio Astronomy Observatory. Parts of a pulsar, n.d. Accessed: 2025-05-19

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    Duncan R. Lorimer. Binary and Millisecond Pulsars.Living Reviews in Relativity, 11(1):8, 2008

    work page 2008

  22. [22]

    Michele Maggiore.Gravitational Waves. Vol. 2: Astrophysics and Cosmology. Oxford University Press, 2018

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Lucas M. B. Alves, Andrew G. Sullivan, Imre Bartos, Doğa Veske, Sebastian Will, Zsuzsa Márka, and Szabolcs Márka. Artificial precision timing array: bridging the decihertz gravitational-wave sensitivity gap with clock satellites, 2024

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Lee S. Finn. Detection, measurement and gravitational radiation.Phys. Rev. D, 46:5236–5249, 1992

    work page 1992

  25. [25]

    Gravitational-wave sensitivity curves

    C J Moore, R H Cole, and C P L Berry. Gravitational-wave sensitivity curves. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(1):015014, 2014

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Stephen R. Taylor, B. S. Sathyaprakash, and Will M. Farr. Understandingω gw(f)in gravitational wave experiments, 2025

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Flanagan

    Eanna E. Flanagan. Sensitivity of the laser interferometer gravitational wave obser- vatory to a stochastic background, and its dependence on the detector orientations. Phys. Rev. D, 48:2389–2407, 1993

    work page 1993

  28. [28]

    E. S. Phinney. A Practical theorem on gravitational wave backgrounds. 2001. REFERENCES 84

    work page 2001

  29. [29]

    A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 15(3):168–173, 1929

    Edwin Hubble. A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 15(3):168–173, 1929

    work page 1929

  30. [30]

    S. R. Salinas.Introdução à Física Estatística. EDUSP, 1997

    work page 1997

  31. [31]

    Alan H. Guth. The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems.Phys. Rev. D, 23:347–356, 1981

    work page 1981

  32. [32]

    Guth and S

    Alan H. Guth and S. H. H. Tye. Phase Transitions and Magnetic Monopole Production in the Very Early Universe.Phys. Rev. Lett., 44:631, 1980. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 44, 963 (1980)]

    work page 1980

  33. [33]

    Hybrid inflation.Physical Review D, 49(2):748–754, 1994

    Andrei Linde. Hybrid inflation.Physical Review D, 49(2):748–754, 1994

    work page 1994

  34. [34]

    G-inflation: Inflation driven by the Galileon field.Phys

    Tsutomu Kobayashi, Masahide Yamaguchi, and Jun’ichi Yokoyama. G-inflation: Inflation driven by the Galileon field.Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:231302, 2010

    work page 2010

  35. [35]

    P. A. R. Ade et al. Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inflation.Astron. Astrophys., 594:A20, 2016

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Steinhardt, and Abraham Loeb

    Anna Ijjas, Paul J. Steinhardt, and Abraham Loeb. Inflationary paradigm in trouble after Planck2013.Physics Letters B, 723(4–5):261–266, 2013

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Predictability crisis in early universe cosmology.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 46:122–133, 2014

    Chris Smeenk. Predictability crisis in early universe cosmology.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 46:122–133, 2014. Philosophy of cosmology

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    Sean M. Carroll. Beyond falsifiability: Normal science in a multiverse, 2018

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Eternal inflation and its implications.Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and Theoretical, 40(25):6811–6826, 2007

    Alan H Guth. Eternal inflation and its implications.Journal of Physics A: Mathe- matical and Theoretical, 40(25):6811–6826, 2007

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    Ovrut, Paul J

    Justin Khoury, Burt A. Ovrut, Paul J. Steinhardt, and Neil Turok. Ekpyrotic universe: Colliding branes and the origin of the hot big bang.Physical Review D, 64(12), 2001

    work page 2001

  41. [41]

    Steinhardt and Neil Turok

    Paul J. Steinhardt and Neil Turok. A cyclic model of the universe.Science, 296(5572):1436–1439, 2002

    work page 2002

  42. [42]

    Steinhardt

    Anna Ijjas and Paul J. Steinhardt. A new kind of cyclic universe.Physics Letters B, 795:666–672, 2019

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Bodley Head, London, 2010

    Roger Penrose.Cycles of time : an extraordinary new view of the universe. Bodley Head, London, 2010

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    Brandenberger and C

    R. Brandenberger and C. Vafa. Superstrings in the early universe.Nuclear Physics B, 316(2):391–410, 1989. REFERENCES 85

    work page 1989

  45. [45]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters.Astron. Astrophys., 641:A6, 2020. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking, and J. M. Stewart. A Natural Measure on the Set of All Universes.Nucl. Phys. B, 281:736, 1987

    work page 1987

  47. [47]

    Carroll.In What Sense Is the Early Universe Fine-Tuned?2014

    Sean M. Carroll.In What Sense Is the Early Universe Fine-Tuned?2014

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    Guth.The inflationary universe: The quest for a new theory of cosmic origins

    Alan H. Guth.The inflationary universe: The quest for a new theory of cosmic origins. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1997

    work page 1997

  49. [49]

    Gauge theory

    David Tong. Gauge theory. Available at http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/ gaugetheory/gt.pdf, 2018

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles.Phys

    John Preskill. Cosmological Production of Superheavy Magnetic Monopoles.Phys. Rev. Lett., 43:1365, 1979

    work page 1979

  51. [51]

    Snowmass White Paper: Cosmology at the Theory Frontier

    Raphael Flauger, Victor Gorbenko, Austin Joyce, Liam McAllister, Gary Shiu, and Eva Silverstein. Snowmass White Paper: Cosmology at the Theory Frontier. In Snowmass 2021, 2022

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Riess et al

    Adam G. Riess et al. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant.Astron. J., 116:1009–1038, 1998

    work page 1998

  53. [53]

    Perlmutter et al

    S. Perlmutter et al. Measurements ofΩandΛfrom 42 High Redshift Supernovae. Astrophys. J., 517:565–586, 1999

    work page 1999

  54. [54]

    Academic Press, 2020

    Scott Dodelson and Fabian Schmidt.Modern Cosmology. Academic Press, 2020

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    Improved Calculation of the Primordial Gravitational Wave Spectrum in the Standard Model.Phys

    Yuki Watanabe and Eiichiro Komatsu. Improved Calculation of the Primordial Gravitational Wave Spectrum in the Standard Model.Phys. Rev. D, 73:123515, 2006

    work page 2006

  56. [56]

    Turner, Martin J

    Michael S. Turner, Martin J. White, and James E. Lidsey. Tensor perturbations in inflationary models as a probe of cosmology.Phys. Rev. D, 48:4613–4622, 1993

    work page 1993

  57. [57]

    Kolb.The Early Universe, volume 69

    Edward W. Kolb.The Early Universe, volume 69. Taylor and Francis, 2019

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    Probing reheating temperature of the universe with gravitational wave background.JCAP, 06:020, 2008

    Kazunori Nakayama, Shun Saito, Yudai Suwa, and Jun’ichi Yokoyama. Probing reheating temperature of the universe with gravitational wave background.JCAP, 06:020, 2008

    work page 2008

  59. [59]

    Blue-tilted Tensor Spectrum and Thermal History of the Universe.JCAP, 02:003, 2015

    Sachiko Kuroyanagi, Tomo Takahashi, and Shuichiro Yokoyama. Blue-tilted Tensor Spectrum and Thermal History of the Universe.JCAP, 02:003, 2015

    work page 2015

  60. [60]

    The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background.Astrophys

    Zaven Arzoumanian et al. The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-wave Background.Astrophys. J. Lett., 905(2):L34, 2020. REFERENCES 86

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology

    Michele Maggiore. Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology. Physics Reports, 331(6):283–367, 2000

    work page 2000

  62. [62]

    Boyle and Alessandra Buonanno

    Latham A. Boyle and Alessandra Buonanno. Relating gravitational wave constraints from primordial nucleosynthesis, pulsar timing, laser interferometers, and the CMB: Implications for the early Universe.Phys. Rev. D, 78:043531, 2008

    work page 2008

  63. [63]

    Mossa et al

    V. Mossa et al. The baryon density of the Universe from an improved rate of deuterium burning.Nature, 587(7833):210–213, 2020

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Cooke, J

    Tiffany Hsyu, Ryan J. Cooke, J. Xavier Prochaska, and Michael Bolte. The PHLEK Survey: ANewDeterminationofthePrimordialHeliumAbundance.The Astrophysical Journal, 896(1):77, 2020

    work page 2020

  65. [65]

    Cooke, Max Pettini, and Charles C

    Ryan J. Cooke, Max Pettini, and Charles C. Steidel. One Percent Determination of the Primordial Deuterium Abundance.Astrophys. J., 855(2):102, 2018

    work page 2018

  66. [66]

    Cyburt, Brian D

    Richard H. Cyburt, Brian D. Fields, Keith A. Olive, and Tsung-Han Yeh. Big bang nucleosynthesis: Present status.Reviews of Modern Physics, 88(1):015004, 2016

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    Riess, Stefano Casertano, Wenlong Yuan, Lucas M

    Adam G. Riess, Stefano Casertano, Wenlong Yuan, Lucas M. Macri, and Dan Scolnic. Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Deter- mination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics beyondΛCDM. Astrophys. J., 876(1):85, 2019

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run.Phys. Rev. X, 13(4):041039, 2023

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run.Phys. Rev. X, 11:021053, 2021

    work page 2021

  70. [70]

    B. P. Abbott et al. GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs.Phys. Rev. X, 9(3):031040, 2019

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from Ad- vanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run.Phys. Rev. D, 104(2):022004, 2021

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    Blue-tilted inflation- ary tensor spectrum and reheating in the light of NANOGrav results.JCAP, 01:071, 2021

    Sachiko Kuroyanagi, Tomo Takahashi, and Shuichiro Yokoyama. Blue-tilted inflation- ary tensor spectrum and reheating in the light of NANOGrav results.JCAP, 01:071, 2021. REFERENCES 87

    work page 2021

  73. [73]

    Spherical bessel function of the first kind: Representations through more general functions

    Wolfram Research. Spherical bessel function of the first kind: Representations through more general functions. https://functions.wolfram.com/Bessel-TypeFunctions/ SphericalBesselJ/06/01/04/01/01/, 2024. Wolfram Functions Site

    work page 2024

  74. [74]

    M. C. Guzzetti, N. Bartolo, M. Liguori, and S. Matarrese. Gravitational waves from inflation.Riv. Nuovo Cim., 39(9):399–495, 2016

    work page 2016

  75. [75]

    The Cosmological Heavy Ion Collider: Fast Thermalization after Cosmic Inflation.Phys

    Evan McDonough. The Cosmological Heavy Ion Collider: Fast Thermalization after Cosmic Inflation.Phys. Lett. B, 809:135755, 2020

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    Inflaxion Dark Matter.JHEP, 08:147, 2019

    Takeshi Kobayashi and Lorenzo Ubaldi. Inflaxion Dark Matter.JHEP, 08:147, 2019

    work page 2019

  77. [77]

    Hiroaki W. H. Tahara and Tsutomu Kobayashi. Nanohertz gravitational waves from a null-energy-condition violation in the early universe.Phys. Rev. D, 102(12):123533, 2020

    work page 2020

  78. [78]

    Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities.Phys

    Roger Penrose. Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities.Phys. Rev. Lett., 14:57–59, 1965

    work page 1965

  79. [79]

    S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose. The Singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 314:529–548, 1970

    work page 1970

  80. [80]

    V. A. Rubakov. The Null Energy Condition and its violation.Phys. Usp., 57:128–142, 2014

    work page 2014