pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.19631 · v3 · submitted 2025-11-24 · 🪐 quant-ph

Shake before use: universal enhancement of quantum thermometry by unitary driving

Emanuele Tumbiolo , Lorenzo Maccone , Chiara Macchiavello , Matteo G.A. Paris , Giacomo Guarnieri This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 05:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum thermometryunitary drivingquantum Fisher informationnon-equilibrium strategiesinformation currentsdriven spin thermometertemperature estimation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Any temperature-dependent unitary drive on a thermal probe increases its quantum Fisher information for temperature estimation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that for any probe starting in a thermal state, a unitary evolution whose Hamiltonian depends on the unknown temperature always raises the quantum Fisher information above the equilibrium value set by static energy fluctuations. This improvement is given by an analytically expressible positive semi-definite kernel built from information currents that track the flow of statistical distinguishability during the drive. A reader might care because equilibrium thermometry loses sensitivity outside narrow temperature windows, while this result supplies a general, model-independent route to better precision that applies to any system where the drive can be made temperature-dependent.

Core claim

The central claim is that any temperature-dependent unitary driving applied to a thermalized probe enhances its quantum Fisher information with respect to its equilibrium value. Such information gain is expressed analytically through a positive semi-definite kernel of information currents that quantify the flow of statistical distinguishability. The results are benchmarked on a driven spin-1/2 thermometer, where resonant modulations restore the quadratic-in-time scaling of the Fisher information and allow shifting the sensitivity peak across arbitrary temperature ranges, together with an analysis of the relation between information gain and control cost.

What carries the argument

The positive semi-definite kernel of information currents, which quantifies the flow of statistical distinguishability under the driven unitary evolution.

If this is right

  • The enhancement is model-independent and holds for arbitrary temperature-dependent unitaries.
  • Resonant modulations of the drive restore quadratic growth of the Fisher information with time.
  • The peak sensitivity can be moved to any desired temperature range by choice of drive.
  • Information gain can be compared against the energetic cost of the control.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If an approximate temperature dependence can be realized without exact prior knowledge, the enhancement might still be useful in laboratory settings.
  • The information-current kernel could be used to design drives that optimize the trade-off between gain and control cost in other metrology tasks.
  • This approach might extend to estimating other parameters by replacing temperature with a different unknown in the drive Hamiltonian.

Load-bearing premise

The driving Hamiltonian must depend on the unknown temperature and the probe must start in a thermal state at that temperature.

What would settle it

Compute the quantum Fisher information for a thermal spin-1/2 state at a chosen temperature, apply a concrete temperature-dependent drive, recompute the information, and check whether the post-drive value exceeds the equilibrium value for every tested temperature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.19631 by Chiara Macchiavello, Emanuele Tumbiolo, Giacomo Guarnieri, Lorenzo Maccone, Matteo G.A. Paris.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the protocol. In the ini [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Time evolution of the QFI for a single-spin probe under a temperature-dependent transverse driving. Time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Behaviour of the maximum QFI at a fixed evolu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum thermometry aims at determining temperature with ultimate precision in the quantum regime. Standard equilibrium approaches, limited by the Quantum Fisher Information given by static energy fluctuations, lose sensitivity outside a fixed temperature window. Non-equilibrium strategies have therefore been recently proposed to overcome these limits, but their advantages are typically model-dependent or tailored for a specific purpose. This Letter establishes a general, model-independent result showing that any temperature-dependent unitary driving applied to a thermalized probe enhances its quantum Fisher information with respect to its equilibrium value. Such information gain is expressed analytically through a positive semi-definite kernel of information currents that quantify the flow of statistical distinguishability. Our results, together with an analysis of the relation between information gain and control cost, are benchmarked on a driven spin-$1/2$ thermometer, furthermore showing that resonant modulations remarkably restore the quadratic-in-time scaling of the Fisher information and allow to shift the sensitivity peak across arbitrary temperature ranges.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that any temperature-dependent unitary driving applied to an initial thermal (Gibbs) state of a probe strictly increases the quantum Fisher information for temperature estimation relative to the undriven equilibrium case. The enhancement is expressed as a positive semi-definite kernel built from information currents that track the flow of statistical distinguishability under the drive. The result is model-independent and is illustrated on a driven spin-1/2 thermometer, where resonant modulations are shown to restore quadratic-in-time scaling of the QFI and to shift the sensitivity peak to arbitrary temperature ranges; an accompanying analysis relates the information gain to control cost.

Significance. If the central mathematical statement holds, the work supplies a general, non-equilibrium route to enhancing quantum thermometry that is not tied to a specific Hamiltonian or noise model. The explicit positive-semidefinite kernel and the control-cost relation constitute concrete, falsifiable strengths. The spin-1/2 benchmark further demonstrates that the enhancement can be realized with experimentally accessible resonant drives.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / main theorem] Abstract and the statement of the main theorem: the enhancement is derived under the assumption that the driving Hamiltonian H(t,T) is explicitly temperature-dependent. Because the unknown temperature T is the parameter being estimated, any laboratory implementation of the exact drive requires inserting the numerical value of T into the control parameters (frequencies, amplitudes, or resonance conditions). The manuscript should clarify whether the positivity result continues to hold for a drive constructed with a guessed or estimated T_g, or whether an adaptive protocol is required; without such clarification the practical applicability of the claimed universal enhancement remains open.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for raising an important point about the practical implementation of temperature-dependent driving. We address the comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity on this issue.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / main theorem] Abstract and the statement of the main theorem: the enhancement is derived under the assumption that the driving Hamiltonian H(t,T) is explicitly temperature-dependent. Because the unknown temperature T is the parameter being estimated, any laboratory implementation of the exact drive requires inserting the numerical value of T into the control parameters (frequencies, amplitudes, or resonance conditions). The manuscript should clarify whether the positivity result continues to hold for a drive constructed with a guessed or estimated T_g, or whether an adaptive protocol is required; without such clarification the practical applicability of the claimed universal enhancement remains open.

    Authors: We agree that the central theorem assumes an explicitly temperature-dependent Hamiltonian H(t,T) and that direct laboratory implementation therefore requires knowledge of T. The positivity of the information-current kernel follows mathematically from this exact dependence; for a drive constructed with an inexact guess T_g the kernel is not guaranteed to remain positive semi-definite, because the derivation exploits the precise functional form of the T-derivative. At the same time, the result indicates that any drive whose parameters are even approximately tuned to the true temperature can still yield a net information gain relative to the static case. We will add a concise discussion (new paragraph in the main text and a short remark in the conclusions) that (i) explicitly states the ideal-case assumption, (ii) notes that the enhancement is not guaranteed for a fixed, non-adaptive guess T_g, and (iii) outlines how a simple adaptive protocol—using a coarse initial estimate to set the drive, followed by iterative refinement—can approach the ideal enhancement. This clarification will be added without modifying the statement or proof of the main theorem. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: enhancement follows directly from QFI definition under temperature-dependent unitaries without self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The paper derives the information gain as a positive semi-definite kernel of information currents from the standard expression for quantum Fisher information of a unitarily evolved thermal state. This is a direct mathematical consequence of the QFI formula when the unitary generator depends on the parameter, with no fitted parameters, no self-citation load-bearing the central inequality, and no renaming of known results. The temperature dependence is an explicit external assumption in the setup rather than an output derived from the result itself. The derivation remains self-contained against the definition of QFI and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result rests on standard quantum mechanics and the definition of the quantum Fisher information; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the general claim. The spin benchmark likely introduces a few control parameters but these are not load-bearing for the universal statement.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The probe is initially in a thermal Gibbs state at the unknown temperature.
    Invoked to define the equilibrium reference and the action of the temperature-dependent drive.
  • domain assumption Unitary driving is generated by a Hamiltonian that can be made explicitly temperature-dependent.
    Central to the claim that the drive depends on the temperature being estimated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5472 in / 1352 out tokens · 33295 ms · 2026-05-17T05:45:18.552330+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gemmer, M

    J. Gemmer, M. Michel, and G. Mahler,Quantum Ther- modynamics: Emergence of Thermodynamic Behavior Within Composite Quantum Systems, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 784 (Springer, 2009)

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Puglisi, A

    A. Puglisi, A. Sarracino, and A. Vulpiani, Temperature in and out of equilibrium: A review of concepts, tools and attempts, Physics Reports709-710, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Mehboudi, A

    M. Mehboudi, A. Sanpera, and L. A. Correa, Thermom- etry in the quantum regime: recent theoretical progress, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical52, 303001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Jørgensen,Ultimate precision bounds on quan- tum thermometry, Ph.D

    M. Jørgensen,Ultimate precision bounds on quan- tum thermometry, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Physics,Technical University of Denmark (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    C. W. Helstrom,Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory, Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Vol. 123 (Academic Press, New York, 1976)

    work page 1976

  6. [6]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum- enhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum limit, Science306, 1330 (2004)

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrology, Physical Review Letters96, 010401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    M. G. A. Paris, Quantum estimation for quantum tech- nology, International Journal of Quantum Information 07, 125 (2009)

    work page 2009

  9. [9]

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states, Physical Review Letters72, 3439 (1994)

    work page 1994

  10. [10]

    L. A. Correa, M. Mehboudi, G. Adesso, and A. San- pera, Individual quantum probes for optimal thermome- try, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 220405 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    P. P. Potts, J. B. Brask, and N. Brunner, Fundamental limits on low-temperature quantum thermometry with finite resolution, Quantum3, 161 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    M. R. Jørgensen, P. P. Potts, M. G. A. Paris, and J. B. Brask, Tight bound on finite-resolution quantum ther- mometry at low temperatures, Physical Review Research 2, 033394 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    De Pasquale and T

    A. De Pasquale and T. M. Stace, Quantum thermome- try, inThermodynamics in the Quantum Regime: Funda- mental Aspects and New Directions, edited by F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Adesso (Springer International Publishing, 2018) pp. 503–527

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Jarzyna and M

    M. Jarzyna and M. Zwierz, Quantum interferometric measurements of temperature, Phys. Rev. A92, 032112 6 (2015)

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    H. Yang, Q. Zheng, P. Yue, and Q. Zhi, Quantum ther- mometry based on interferometric power, Europhysics Letters146, 38002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    D. Y. Akamatsu, L. F. R. de Moura, G. G. Damas, G. D. de Moraes Neto, V. Montenegro, and N. G. de Almeida, Probing the limits of dispersive quantum thermometry with a nonlinear mach-zehnder-based quantum simulator (2025), arXiv:2507.04246

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Mehboudi, M

    M. Mehboudi, M. R. Jørgensen, S. Seah, J. B. Brask, J. Kołodyński, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Fundamental limits in bayesian thermometry and attainability via adaptive strategies, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 130502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    A. H. Kiilerich, A. De Pasquale, and V. Giovannetti, Dy- namical approach to ancilla-assisted quantum thermom- etry, Phys. Rev. A98, 042124 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Sekatski and M

    P. Sekatski and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Optimal nonequilib- riumthermometryinMarkovianenvironments,Quantum 6, 869 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Mukherjee, A

    V. Mukherjee, A. Zwick, A. G. Kofman, and G. Kur- izki, Enhanced low-temperature thermometry by exter- nal control, Communications Physics2, 162 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Glatthard and L

    J. Glatthard and L. A. Correa, Bending the rules of low- temperature thermometry with periodic driving, Quan- tum6, 705 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Razavian, C

    S. Razavian, C. Benedetti, M. Bina, Y. Akbari- Kourbolagh, and M. G. Paris, Quantum thermometry by single-qubit dephasing, The European Physical Journal Plus134, 284 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Gebbia, C

    F. Gebbia, C. Benedetti, F. Benatti, R. Floreanini, M. Bina, and M. G. A. Paris, Two-qubit quantum probes for the temperature of an ohmic environment, Phys. Rev. A101, 032112 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Zhang, C

    N. Zhang, C. Chen, and P. Wang, Enhancing low- temperature quantum thermometry via sequential mea- surements, Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 044008 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Y. Yang, V. Montenegro, and A. Bayat, Sequential- measurement thermometry with quantum many-body probes, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 024069 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Planck,Treatise on Thermodynamics(Dover Publi- cations, New York, 1990) originally published in German in 1897

    M. Planck,Treatise on Thermodynamics(Dover Publi- cations, New York, 1990) originally published in German in 1897

    work page 1990

  27. [27]

    H. B. Callen,Thermodynamics and an Introduction to Thermostatistics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1985)

    work page 1985

  28. [28]

    Scandi, H

    M. Scandi, H. J. D. Miller, J. Anders, and M. Perarnau- Llobet, Quantum work statistics close to equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023377 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Abiuso, P

    P. Abiuso, P. Sekatski, J. Calsamiglia, and M. Perarnau- Llobet, Fundamental limits of metrology at thermal equi- librium, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 010801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    F. M. Ciaglia, J. Jost, and L. J. Schwachhöfer, Differ- ential geometric aspects of parametric estimation theory for states on finite-dimensional c∗-algebras, Entropy22, 1332 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Petz,Quantum Information Theory and Quan- tum Statistics, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008)

    D. Petz,Quantum Information Theory and Quan- tum Statistics, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008)

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    ichi Amari and H

    S. ichi Amari and H. Nagaoka,Methods of Information Geometry, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 191 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000)

    work page 2000

  33. [33]

    M. G. A. Paris, Achieving the landau bound to precision of quantum thermometry in systems with vanishing gap, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical49, 03LT02 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    A. Das, W. Górecki, and R. Demkowicz-Dobrzański, Uni- versal time scalings of sensitivity in markovian quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. A111, L020403 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Planella, M

    G. Planella, M. F. B. Cenni, A. Acín, and M. Mehboudi, Bath-induced correlations enhance thermometry preci- sion at low temperatures, Physical Review Letters128, 040502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    Abiuso, P

    P. Abiuso, P. Andrea Erdman, M. Ronen, F. Noé, G. Haack, and M. Perarnau-Llobet, Optimal thermome- ters with spin networks, Quantum Science and Technol- ogy9, 035008 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Aiache, C

    Y. Aiache, C. Seida, K. El Anouz, and A. El Allati, Non-markovianenhancementofnonequilibriumquantum thermometry, Phys. Rev. E110, 024132 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    J. Liu, H. Yuan, X.-M. Lu, and X. Wang, Quantum fisher information matrix and multiparameter estima- tion,JournalofPhysicsA:MathematicalandTheoretical 53, 023001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    A.CollaandH.-P.Breuer,Thermodynamicrolesofquan- tum environments: from heat baths to work reservoirs, Quantum Science and Technology10, 015047 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Strasberg,Quantum Stochastic Thermodynamics: Foundations and Selected Applications, Oxford Graduate Texts (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2022)

    P. Strasberg,Quantum Stochastic Thermodynamics: Foundations and Selected Applications, Oxford Graduate Texts (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2022)

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Campisi, P

    M. Campisi, P. Talkner, and P. Hänggi, Fluctuation the- orem for arbitrary open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 210401 (2009)

    work page 2009

  42. [42]

    A. S. Trushechkin, M. Merkli, J. D. Cresser, and J. An- ders,Openquantumsystemdynamicsandthemeanforce gibbs state, AVS Quantum Science4(2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Advances in quantum metrology, Nature Photonics5, 222 (2011)

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    Feldmann and R

    T. Feldmann and R. Kosloff, Quantum four-stroke heat engine: Thermodynamic observables in a model with in- trinsic friction, Phys. Rev. E68, 016101 (2003)

    work page 2003

  45. [45]

    Plastina, A

    F. Plastina, A. Alecce, T. J. G. Apollaro, G. Falcone, G. Francica, F. Galve, N. Lo Gullo, and R. Zambrini, Irreversible work and inner friction in quantum thermo- dynamic processes, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 260601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    H. J. D. Miller, M. H. Mohammady, M. Perarnau-Llobet, and G. Guarnieri, Thermodynamic uncertainty relation in slowly driven quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 210603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    Onishchenko, G

    O. Onishchenko, G. Guarnieri, P. Rosillo-Rodes, D. Pijn, J. Hilder, U. G. Poschinger, M. Perarnau-Llobet, J. Eis- ert, and F. Schmidt-Kaler, Probing coherent quantum thermodynamics using a trapped ion, Nature Communi- cations15, 6974 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Francica, J

    G. Francica, J. Goold, and F. Plastina, Role of coher- ence in the nonequilibrium thermodynamics of quantum systems, Phys. Rev. E99, 042105 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Petz, Monotone metrics on matrix spaces, Linear Al- gebra and its Applications244, 81 (1996)

    D. Petz, Monotone metrics on matrix spaces, Linear Al- gebra and its Applications244, 81 (1996)

    work page 1996

  50. [50]

    See supplemental material

    work page

  51. [51]

    Seveso, M

    L. Seveso, M. A. C. Rossi, and M. G. A. Paris, Quan- tum metrology beyond the quantum cramér-rao theorem, Phys. Rev. A95, 012111 (2017)

    work page 2017

  52. [52]

    X.-Q. Li, Y. Tao, T. Chen, W. Wu, Y. Xie, C.-W. Wu, and P.-X. Chen, Thermometry of trapped ions based on bichromatic driving, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 064022 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Gambetta, A

    J. Gambetta, A. Blais, D. I. Schuster, A. Wallraff, L. Frunzio, J. Majer, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Qubit-photon interactions in a cavity: 1 Measurement-induced dephasing and number splitting, Phys. Rev. A74, 042318 (2006)

    work page 2006

  54. [54]

    A. P. Sears, A. Petrenko, G. Catelani, L. Sun, H. Paik, G. Kirchmair, L. Frunzio, L. I. Glazman, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Photon shot noise dephasing in the strong- dispersive limit of circuit qed, Phys. Rev. B86, 180504 (2012)

    work page 2012

  55. [55]

    Korotkov, Measurement of small photon numbers in cir- cuit qed resonators, Phys

    J.Atalaya, A.Opremcak, A.Nersisyan, K.Lee,andA.N. Korotkov, Measurement of small photon numbers in cir- cuit qed resonators, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 203601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Petz and C

    D. Petz and C. Sudár, Geometries of quantum states, Journal of Mathematical Physics37, 2662 (1996)

    work page 1996

  57. [57]

    E. A. Morozova and N. N. Čencov, Markov invariant ge- ometry on state manifolds, inCurrent Problems in Math- ematics. Newest Results, Vol. 36 (VINITI, Moscow, 1989) pp. 69–102, in Russian

    work page 1989

  58. [58]

    Supplemental Material S1: DERIVING THE EXPRESSION FOR THE DYNAMICAL INCREMENT OF THE QFI In this section we derive the two central identities of this work, namely Eqs

    M.Scandi,Information and Thermodynamics,Ph.D.the- sis, Institut de Ciències Fotòniques (ICFO), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (2023). Supplemental Material S1: DERIVING THE EXPRESSION FOR THE DYNAMICAL INCREMENT OF THE QFI In this section we derive the two central identities of this work, namely Eqs. (1) and (13) of the main text. The former express...

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Thus, the initial manifold is that of Gibbs states{π0(β)}, equipped with QFIF β π0 = Varπ0(H0)

    At timet= 0, the state of the thermometer is thermal (at inverse temperatureβ) with respect to its bare Hamiltonian, as a result of thermalization with a sample (whose temperature we want to estimate) that has then been subsequently disconnected from the probe. Thus, the initial manifold is that of Gibbs states{π0(β)}, equipped with QFIF β π0 = Varπ0(H0)

    work page

  60. [60]

    The ensuing dynamics isρ(t, β) =U t,βπ0(β)U † t,β, withU t,β =Texp h − i ℏ R t 0 H(s, β)ds i

    Attimest >0, the probeHamiltonian iscoupledtoanexternalperturbationV, yieldingH(t, β) =H 0+λ(t, β)V, withλ(t, β)the driving profile, assumed to be temperature-dependent in the most general setting. The ensuing dynamics isρ(t, β) =U t,βπ0(β)U † t,β, withU t,β =Texp h − i ℏ R t 0 H(s, β)ds i . First, notice that, exploiting the unitary covariance ofJρ(t) an...

    work page