Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 83 references

This paper claims that constrained analytic continuation of quantum Monte Carlo single-hole Green's functions resolves sharp spectral features in one-dimensional spin chains, revealing a gap between two holon bands where the spin-charge sep

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 20:15 UTC pith:QGWNLJLR

load-bearing objection The method work is real and the dimerized-chain spin-polaron results are convincing, but the holon-band gap claim is read off constraints that presuppose the sharp features being measured, and the paper itself concedes it has not cross-validated them. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2511.20447 v3 pith:QGWNLJLR submitted 2025-11-25 cond-mat.str-el

Single-hole spectral functions in one-dimensional quantum magnets with different ground states

Sibin Yang , Gabe Schumm , Bowen Zhao , Anders W. Sandvik This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 75.10.Pq71.27.+a75.40.Mg
keywords single-hole spectral functionspin-charge separationspin polaront-J modelvalence-bond solidstochastic analytic continuationquantum Monte Carloone-dimensional spin chains
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tests how much sharp structure can be recovered from imaginary-time quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) data on single-hole spectral functions in 1D spin chains, using constrained stochastic analytic continuation (SAC). It reproduces the established spin-charge separation of the t-J chain, then reports two new findings: a gap between two holon bands where the standard mean-field ansatz predicts degeneracy at momenta k=0 and k=π, and evidence that deep in the spontaneously dimerized valence-bond-solid phase the lowest single-hole excitation is a bound spinon-holon object (a spin polaron) rather than a deconfined pair. In a statically dimerized chain it resolves equally spaced spin-polaron bands with even and odd internal modes. The broader claim is methodological: constrained SAC can extract sharp edges and quasiparticle peaks that unconstrained analytic continuation blurs, making QMC competitive with or better than DMRG for such fermionic spectra.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the conventional spin-charge separation ansatz is quantitatively incomplete even where it works qualitatively. When combined with lower-edge and double-edge constrained SAC parametrizations, the QMC-derived spectral function of the t-J chain at the supersymmetric point (t=1, J=2) and of the t-J-Q chain at the dimerization critical point show that the upper and lower holon branches do not merge at k=0 and k=π as the ansatz predicts; instead a finite gap persists, weakly dependent on system size for L≥32. In the spontaneously dimerized t-J-Q phase (t=1, J=0, Q=1), the methods show a sharp low-energy quasiparticle—interpreted as the even-p

What carries the argument

The central machinery is constrained stochastic analytic continuation (SAC) applied to the single-hole imaginary-time Green's function G(k,τ), computed with SSE QMC using Angelucci's canonical transformation so the hole appears only in the measurement, not in the sign-free host sampling. The spectral function A(k,ω) is represented by many δ-functions, and constraints are imposed on their arrangement: an edge is enforced by requiring monotonically increasing spacing of equal-weight δ-functions (giving a power-law divergent edge), a quasiparticle is enforced by a single macroscopic δ-function at the lower bound, and an optional second gap excludes continuum weight below a further edge. These c

Load-bearing premise

The extracted spectral features—the gap between the two holon bands, the isolated spin-polaron peak in the VBS phase, and the even-odd polaron bands—are what the constrained parametrizations impose rather than what the imaginary-time data alone demand, because each constraint (double edge, δ-function edge, second gap) presupposes the very structure being reported and the paper validates the outcome only by visual comparison across parametrizations.

What would settle it

Re-analyze the same QMC Green's functions G(k,τ) with an independent continuation method that does not presuppose edges or quasiparticle peaks—for example, time-dependent DMRG on comparable chain lengths, or unconstrained SAC with statistical cross-validation—and check whether the finite gap between the two holon bands at k=0 and k=π and the isolated low-energy quasiparticle in the VBS phase persist. If either feature disappears or moves outside statistical uncertainty, the central new physics claims are artifacts of the constraints.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • If the holon-band gap at k=0 and k=π is real, the mean-field spin-charge separation ansatz is not exact; the actual low-energy spectrum has interaction-induced avoided crossings, and quantitative theories must go beyond non-interacting spinon-holon pictures.
  • In the spontaneously dimerized VBS phase, the lowest single-hole excitation is a spin polaron (a bound spinon-holon pair), implying spin-charge confinement in that phase, with an even-parity ground state and an odd-parity excited band separated roughly by 2t.
  • The equally spaced even-odd spin-polaron bands in the statically dimerized chain imply a linear string potential between spinon and holon, analogous to quark confinement, and resolvable with the constrained method.
  • Constrained SAC on SSE QMC data can resolve sharp fermionic spectral features in 1D with frequency resolution exceeding unconstrained continuation and DMRG-based approaches, making QMC a competitive tool for single-particle dynamics in sign-problem-free host systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the holon gap persists in the thermodynamic limit, a testable extension is to look for a corresponding suppression of spectral weight near k=0 and k=π in ARPES data on quasi-1D materials such as SrCuO2, where holon branches are commonly fit with cosine dispersions that touch at those momenta.
  • The parity selection rule found for the dimerized chain—even polaron weight vanishing at k=π and odd at k=0—could be used as a diagnostic in other numerical or experimental settings to identify internal symmetry of bound parton states.
  • The same constrained-SAC pipeline transfers directly to the 2D t-J model, where the fate of the spin polaron versus deconfined spinons is central to cuprate physics; the systematic comparison of constraints demonstrated here offers a template for those studies.
  • A statistical cross-validation of the three parametrizations, which the paper notes is possible, would sharpen confidence in each reported feature and could be run on the same data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops and applies constrained stochastic analytic continuation (SAC) to the single-hole spectral function A(k,ω) of 1D S=1/2 t-J and t-J-Q chains. The imaginary-time Green's function G(k,τ) is obtained by SSE QMC using Angelucci's canonical transformation, and A(k,ω) is extracted with several SAC parametrizations that impose edge, quasiparticle, and gap constraints. The authors benchmark G(k,τ) against exact diagonalization for N=8 chains and benchmark constrained SAC output against ED for a bond-alternating dimerized chain. They report spin-charge separation in the uniform critical phase, a finite gap between holon bands at k=0 and k=π (claimed to disagree with the conventional spin-charge separation ansatz), evidence for spinon-holon binding (spin polaron) deep in the spontaneously dimerized VBS phase, and equally spaced spin-polaron bands in a statically dimerized chain. The paper presents the method in detail and explicitly discusses the presence and dangers of constraints in Sec. V.

Significance. If the central findings hold, the paper would show that the mean-field spin-charge separation ansatz is incomplete for the uniform t-J/t-J-Q chain, that a spin polaron is the lowest single-hole excitation in the spontaneously dimerized phase, and that constrained SAC can resolve sharp fermionic spectral features beyond conventional analytic continuation. The methodological core is strong: the SSE implementation of Angelucci's transformation, the N=8 ED validation of G(k,τ) (Fig. 2), and the L=12 ED cross-check of the dimerized band ladder (Fig. 14a vs 14c) are concrete, reproducible anchors. However, the new physics claims are read off constrained SAC outputs that share a sharp-feature prior, and the paper itself states that only visual comparisons were made. The significance is therefore high but conditional on an independent test of the constraint-induced bias.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III A; Figs. 7–8; Sec. V] The central new claim—a finite gap between the two holon bands at k=0 and k=π—is extracted from edge positions produced by constrained SAC. The double-edge parametrization (Fig. 6) and the single-edge/δ-edge variants explicitly assume sharp edges, and the dispersion parameters t_h, J_s, μ in Eqs. (32) are fitted to those same edge positions. Consistency among three parametrizations is therefore not an independent test, because all three share the sharp-edge prior. The paper admits in Sec. V that only visual comparisons were made and that statistical cross-validation is possible but was not performed. No finite-size extrapolation or statistical uncertainty of the gap is given; the statement that the flattening is 'only very weakly dependent on system size for L≥32' does not quantify an extrapolated gap. If the true A(k,ω) has a rounded or weakly divergent onset, the constrained priors wil
  2. [Sec. III B; Figs. 11–13] The VBS spin-polaron evidence also rests on a prior: the δ-edge parametrization (Fig. 11) presupposes an isolated quasiparticle with weight a_0, and the second-gap scan (Fig. 13) presupposes a gap. The optimized a_0(k) can therefore be nonzero even if the true spectrum has no δ-like peak. The text is appropriately hedged, but the abstract states 'evidence for spinon-holon binding at large Q/J' as a result. I ask for at least one independent check not using the δ-edge prior—for example, a small-system ED comparison in the t-J-Q VBS phase, or the statistical cross-validation of Refs. [52,54] to choose between the δ-edge and edge-only parametrizations—or, if no such check is available, for the claim to be explicitly presented as a conjecture rather than as evidence.
  3. [II B; Figs. 2 and 14] The method-validation core validates quantities different from the critical-phase edge/gap claim. Figure 2 benchmarks the imaginary-time Green's function, not the analytic-continuation output A(k,ω). Figure 14 validates constrained SAC for isolated spin-polaron bands in a strongly dimerized chain, where the spectral structure is qualitatively different from the power-law edges of the critical phase. Thus the ability of constrained SAC to locate true edges in a power-law continuum—the load-bearing input for the holon-gap claim—is not independently benchmarked. The paper should either provide such a benchmark (e.g., against the known L=28 ED spectrum of Ref. [25], or against a model with known edge singularities) or clearly mark the gap as a method-dependent observation pending further validation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III A, near Fig. 7] 'In Figs. 7(b) and 7(a), we have fitted G(0,τ) to a single δ-function' appears to contain a typo; the intended references are probably 7(b) and 7(c). Please check all cross-references.
  2. [Sec. V] The caveat 'Here we have only provided visual comparisons' is important and should appear earlier, in Sec. III A, so that readers do not mistake the three-parametrization comparison for a quantitative validation.
  3. [Fig. 13] The inset labels and axes are small; consider enlarging and adding error bars from independent SAC runs to the ⟨χ²⟩/N_τ curves.
  4. [Fig. 14] The color scale in panel (a) is inverted relative to panels (b) and (c), making visual comparison unnecessarily difficult; using the same convention would improve clarity.
  5. [General] A data/code availability statement would strengthen reproducibility, especially given the detailed algorithmic description.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged

Headline holon gap and VBS spin-polaron evidence are read off constrained SAC fits whose priors include the features claimed; ED anchors keep the paper from being fully circular.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. III, text before Eqs. (32)-(33); Fig. 7 caption]
    "The parameterst h andJ s are equal to 2t andJ in the mean-field Hamiltonian according to Ref. [71], but instead of the bare values they can also be taken as phenomenological parameters. In the case of thet-J-Qchain, we have not derived the mean-field expressions for ts and J s but simply take them as fitting parameters. In all cases, we also have to add a constant to the holon dispersion, corresponding to a chemical potential,ϵ h →ϵ h +µ, where we also treatµas a fitting parameter."

    The 'predictions' of the spin-charge-separation ansatz with which the SAC edges are compared are not parameter-free: t_h, J_s, and μ are fitted to the same spectral edges. Fig. 7 states that J_s = 1.35 was 'chosen to match the holon dispersion close to k=π and the putative spinon branch close to k=0.' Thus the claimed agreement with the ansatz is partly reinstalled by the fit, and the residual non-closure at k=0,π is a fit residual of a constrained continuation rather than an independent measurement.

  2. other [Sec. III A, Fig. 6 and text; Sec. V]
    "Here we further extend this approach to also involve an upper edge, combining three different sets of mutually constrained δ-functions, as illustrated in Fig. 6. ... One may argue that the constraints introduce bias and the approach either just confirms previously known facts or produces misleading results. ... Here we have only provided visual comparisons, but in principle statistical cross-validation methods can also be used to single out the most likely spectrum out of a group [54]."

    The double-edge parametrization presupposes compact support between two singular edges at every k. The headline holon gap at k=0,π is the separation of these two imposed edges, and the paper's own Sec. V concedes that only visual comparisons were made and that constraints may 'produce misleading results.' Without a constraint-free estimate, finite-size scaling, or cross-validation, the non-degeneracy of the two holon bands is not established independently of the edge prior.

  3. fitted input called prediction [Sec. III B, Fig. 13 and surrounding text]
    "To explore the possibility of a very small gap separating an isolated sharp quasiparticle from the continuum, we impose a further constraint; a lower bound ω 1 > ω 0 for the contributions above the macroscopic δ-function at ω 0. ... The fact that the gap is small ... gives further support to the existence of a spin polaron—a single isolated bound state followed by a continuum of excitations."

    The VBS spin-polaron evidence is produced by a parametrization that already contains a macroscopic δ-function quasiparticle edge (Fig. 11) and then imposes a second gap ω_1 > ω_0. The existence of the bound state and of a gap are inputs of the constrained model; the optimized small ω_1 is then cited as support for the spin polaron. The conclusion is therefore partly a restatement of the assumed parametrization, not an independent detection.

full rationale

The QMC Green's function computation itself is validated against exact diagonalization in Fig. 2, and the bond-alternating chain results are cross-checked against ED for L=12 in Fig. 14; those anchors are independent and keep the paper from being globally circular. The repeated citations to the authors' own SAC developments are not treated as load-bearing circularity because the method has external benchmarks elsewhere and the QMC-to-Green's-function pipeline is tested against ED here. However, the paper's genuinely new physics claims are read off constrained SAC outputs whose priors overlap with the claimed findings. The ansatz parameters t_h, J_s, μ are fitted to the same edges they are used to explain; the double-edge parametrization forces two singular edges into every spectrum; and the δ-edge plus second-gap parametrization forces a quasiparticle and a gap before measuring them. The paper itself flags this in Sec. V ('constraints introduce bias... misleading results') and admits only visual comparisons were made. Therefore the holon gap and the VBS spin-polaron identification are partially circular: the inputs of the constrained models carry part of the output. This is not a full reduction—edge locations and weights are sampled and compared across parametrizations, and some independent ED checks exist—so a moderate score of 4 is appropriate.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The ledger counts what the central claims pull from outside: five fitted parameters (t_h, J_s, μ, a_0(k), ω_1) control every quantitative match to the ansatz and every quasiparticle/gap claim; six axioms anchor the interpretation. No invented entities — spinon, holon, spin polaron, and phase-string are existing concepts, and the even/odd polaron parity is a relabeling of established bound-state quantum numbers. The heaviest items are the fitted ansatz parameters and the assumption that constrained SAC outputs correspond to true spectral features.

free parameters (5)
  • t_h (holon hopping amplitude) = 2t (bare) for t-J; 1.8 for t-J-Q at Q_c
    Holon dispersion Eq. (32b); "taken as phenomenological" and "chosen to optimize the agreement with the lower edge close to k=π/2" (Fig. 8 caption).
  • J_s (spinon exchange amplitude) = J (bare, J/t=0.4); 1.35 (supersymmetric point); 1.05 (t-J-Q at Q_c)
    Spinon dispersion Eq. (32a), adjusted to match the lower edge near k=0; the paper itself doubts this fit may be spurious ("The use of the ansatz to fit a lower spinon branch... may then not be correct").
  • μ (holon chemical-potential shift) = not quoted (adjusted per case)
    "we also have to add a constant to the holon dispersion... where we also treat μ as a fitting parameter" (Sec. III).
  • a_0(k) (quasiparticle weight at δ-edge) = 0 to ~1 across k (Figs. 12a, 17)
    Optimized per k by χ² scan for the δ-edge parametrization; the existence of a quasiparticle is assumed by the parametrization, its weight is fitted to the data.
  • ω_1 (second-gap position) = 1.82 at k=π/4 (VBS case, Fig. 13)
    Result of a 2D (a_0, ω_1) χ² optimization; no uncertainty estimate is given for the optimum.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Spin-charge separation ansatz dispersions ε_s = -J_s cos q_s, ε_h = -t_h cos q_h, F_k = (J_s² + t_h² - 2 t_h J_s cos k)^½ (Eqs. 32-33)
    Imported from the mean-field slave-boson treatment (Refs. [10, 71]) and used as the interpretive template for all uniform-chain spectra; parameters J_s, t_h, μ are then fitted.
  • domain assumption Constrained SAC parametrizations (monotone-spacing edge, double-edge, macroscopic δ-edge, second-gap bound) represent true spectral features
    Load-bearing for every new claim; Sec. V concedes constraints "introduce bias" and may "produce misleading results"; only visual comparisons across parametrizations were performed.
  • standard math Lehmann representation G(k,τ) = (1/π)∫dω A(k,ω) e^{-τω} (Eq. 26) with A from Eq. (24)
    Standard T=0 spectral decomposition; not in dispute.
  • domain assumption The host t-J-Q dimerization transition at (Q/J)_c ≈ 0.1645 is in the J1-J2 universality class driven by a marginal operator
    Taken from Refs. [59-67]; used to treat the Q_c spectra as representative of the critical phase.
  • domain assumption The SSE matrix-element-ratio estimator (Eqs. 20-23) gives unbiased G(i,j,τ) at L=64, β=2N
    Validated against ED only for N=8 (Fig. 2); extrapolation to L=64 and trust in the hole-path branching sums is assumed.
  • domain assumption L=64 is effectively thermodynamic; the holon-gap size does not shrink with L for L≥32
    Stated in Sec. III A ("only very weakly dependent on the system size for L≥32") without a shown scaling analysis.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 25610 in / 20609 out tokens · 196041 ms · 2026-08-03T20:15:35.539677+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Single-hole spectral functions in one-dimensional quantum magnets with different ground states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QGWNLJLR

@misc{pith2026251120447,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Single-hole spectral functions in one-dimensional quantum magnets with different ground states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QGWNLJLR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.20447}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Recent advances in numerical analytic continuation with physics-motivated constraints allow sharp spectral features to be extracted from imaginary-time quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) data. We apply these methods to one-dimensional $S=1/2$ spin systems with a single ejected fermion, computing the momentum- and energy-dependent single-hole spectral function $A(k,\omega)$. The real-space Green's function $G(r,\tau)$ is evaluated using Angelucci's canonical transformation [Phys. Rev. B 51, 11580 (1995)] implemented within stochastic series expansion QMC, and $A(k,\omega)$ is obtained by constrained stochastic analytic continuation. We contrast systems exhibiting spin-charge separation with those forming a spin polaron through effective spin-charge attraction. For the conventional $t$-$J$ chain, we recover the established signatures of spin-charge separation. Adding a multispin interaction $Q$ drives the system into a spontaneously dimerized valence-bond-solid (VBS) state; spin-charge-separation features persist up to the transition. Although the spectra generally agree with the conventional analytical ansatz, we find a gap between two holon bands that the ansatz predicts to be degenerate at $k=0$ and $k=\pi$. Deep in the VBS phase, the spectra provide evidence for spinon-holon binding at large $Q/J$. In a statically dimerized $t$-$J$ chain, we observe equally spaced spin-polaron bands associated with increasingly large bound states and two internal modes, even and odd under parton permutation. These results demonstrate the power of constrained analytic continuation combined with large-scale QMC for resolving sharp spectral features and distinguishing fractionalized from bound excitations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.20447 by Anders W. Sandvik, Bowen Zhao, Gabe Schumm, Sibin Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustration of an SSE configuration of a system with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparisons of the exact [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Two parameterizations of the spectral function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spectral function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Spectral profiles for fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Constraints on the sampled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Spectral function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Illustration of a single hole injected into the VBS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Parametrization of a spectral function with a sharp [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Spectral function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Example of an optimized second gap with the same [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Single-hole spectral function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Two representative vertical cuts of Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Quasi-particle weight [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_17.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Hasegawa and D

    Y. Hasegawa and D. Poilblanc, Hole dynamics in the t-J model: An exact diagonalization study, Phys. Rev. B40, 9035 (1989)

    1989

  2. [2]

    Dagotto, R

    E. Dagotto, R. Joynt, A. Moreo, S. Bacci, and E. Gagliano, Strongly correlated electronic systems with one hole: Dynamical properties, Phys. Rev. B41, 9049 (1990)

    1990

  3. [3]

    Dagotto, A

    E. Dagotto, A. Moreo, F. Ortolani, D. Poilblanc, and J. Riera, Static and dynamical properties of doped Hub- bard clusters, Phys. Rev. B45, 10741 (1992)

    1992

  4. [4]

    Poilblanc, T

    D. Poilblanc, T. Ziman, H. J. Schulz, and E. Dagotto, Dynamical properties of a single hole in an antiferromag- net, Phys. Rev. B47, 14267 (1993)

    1993

  5. [5]

    Poilblanc, H

    D. Poilblanc, H. J. Schulz, and T. Ziman, Single-hole spectral density in an antiferromagnetic background, Phys. Rev. B47, 3268 (1993)

    1993

  6. [6]

    Preuss, A

    R. Preuss, A. Muramatsu, W. von der Linden, P. Di- eterich, F. F. Assaad, and W. Hanke, Spectral Proper- ties of the One-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 732 (1994)

    1994

  7. [7]

    B´ eran, D

    P. B´ eran, D. Poilblanc, and R. Laughlin, Evidence for composite nature of quasiparticles in the 2D t-J model, 18 Nuclear Physics B473, 707 (1996)

    1996

  8. [8]

    Sorella, Sharp photoemission spectra in the quantum antiferromagnet, Phys

    S. Sorella, Sharp photoemission spectra in the quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B53, 15119 (1996)

    1996

  9. [9]

    Sorella and A

    S. Sorella and A. Parola, Spectral Properties of One Di- mensional Insulators and Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4604 (1996)

    1996

  10. [10]

    Suzuura and N

    H. Suzuura and N. Nagaosa, Spin-charge separation in angle-resolved photoemission spectra, Phys. Rev. B56, 3548 (1997)

    1997

  11. [11]

    K. Penc, K. Hallberg, F. Mila, and H. Shiba, Spectral functions of the one-dimensional Hubbard model in the U→+∞limit:How to use the factorized wave function, Phys. Rev. B55, 15475 (1997)

    1997

  12. [12]

    Sorella and A

    S. Sorella and A. Parola, Theory of hole propagation in one-dimensional insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B57, 6444 (1998)

    1998

  13. [13]

    G. B. Martins, C. Gazza, J. C. Xavier, A. Feiguin, and E. Dagotto, Doped Stripes in Models for the Cuprates Emerging from the One-Hole Properties of the Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 5844 (2000)

    2000

  14. [14]

    Capponi and F

    S. Capponi and F. F. Assaad, Spin and charge dy- namics of the ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic two- dimensional half-filled Kondo lattice model, Phys. Rev. B63, 155114 (2001)

    2001

  15. [15]

    K. A. Al-Hassanieh, F. A. Reboredo, A. E. Feiguin, I. Gonz´ alez, and E. Dagotto, Excitons in the One- Dimensional Hubbard Model: A Real-Time Study, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 166403 (2008)

    2008

  16. [16]

    T. A. Maier, D. Poilblanc, and D. J. Scalapino, Dynamics of the Pairing Interaction in the Hubbard andt−JMod- els of High-Temperature Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 237001 (2008)

    2008

  17. [17]

    E. H. Lieb and F. Y. Wu, Absence of Mott Transition in an Exact Solution of the Short-Range, One-Band Model in One Dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.20, 1445 (1968)

    1968

  18. [18]

    Voit, One-dimensional Fermi liquids, Reports on Progress in Physics58, 977 (1995)

    J. Voit, One-dimensional Fermi liquids, Reports on Progress in Physics58, 977 (1995)

    1995

  19. [19]

    Arikawa, Y

    M. Arikawa, Y. Saiga, and Y. Kuramoto, Electron Addi- tion Spectrum in the Supersymmetrict−JModel with Inverse-Square Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 3096 (2001)

    2001

  20. [20]

    Arikawa, T

    M. Arikawa, T. Yamamoto, Y. Saiga, and Y. Kuramoto, Exact electron addition spectrum in 1D supersymmetric t–J model with 1/r 2 interaction, Nuclear Physics B702, 380 (2004)

    2004

  21. [21]

    Kollath, U

    C. Kollath, U. Schollw¨ ock, and W. Zwerger, Spin-Charge Separation in Cold Fermi Gases: A Real Time Analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 176401 (2005)

    2005

  22. [22]

    Kollath and U

    C. Kollath and U. Schollw¨ ock, Cold Fermi gases: a new perspective on spin-charge separation, New Journal of Physics8, 220 (2006)

    2006

  23. [23]

    Poilblanc, A

    D. Poilblanc, A. L¨ auchli, M. Mambrini, and F. Mila, Spinon deconfinement in doped frustrated quantum an- tiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B73, 100403 (2006)

    2006

  24. [24]

    ˇSmakov, A

    J. ˇSmakov, A. L. Chernyshev, and S. R. White, Spinon- holon interactions in an anisotropict−Jchain: A com- prehensive study, Phys. Rev. B76, 115106 (2007)

    2007

  25. [25]

    Wrzosek, A

    P. Wrzosek, A. K losi´ nski, Y. Wang, M. Berciu, C. E. Agrapidis, and K. Wohlfeld, The fate of the spin polaron in the 1D antiferromagnets, SciPost Phys.17, 018 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    C. Kim, A. Y. Matsuura, Z.-X. Shen, N. Motoyama, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, T. Tohyama, and S. Maekawa, Ob- servation of Spin-Charge Separation in One-Dimensional SrCuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4054 (1996)

    1996

  27. [27]

    Kim, Z.-X

    C. Kim, Z.-X. Shen, N. Motoyama, H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, T. Tohyama, and S. Maekawa, Separation of spin and charge excitations in one-dimensional SrCuO 2, Phys. Rev. B56, 15589 (1997)

    1997

  28. [28]

    Fujisawa, T

    H. Fujisawa, T. Yokoya, T. Takahashi, S. Miyasaka, M. Kibune, and H. Takagi, Angle-resolved photoemission study of Sr 2CuO3, Phys. Rev. B59, 7358 (1999)

    1999

  29. [29]

    Recati, P

    A. Recati, P. O. Fedichev, W. Zwerger, and P. Zoller, Spin-Charge Separation in Ultracold Quantum Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 020401 (2003)

    2003

  30. [30]

    Koitzsch, S

    A. Koitzsch, S. V. Borisenko, J. Geck, V. B. Zabolot- nyy, M. Knupfer, J. Fink, P. Ribeiro, B. B¨ uchner, and R. Follath, Current spinon-holon description of the one- dimensional charge-transfer insulator SrCuO 2: Angle- resolved photoemission measurements, Phys. Rev. B73, 201101 (2006)

    2006

  31. [31]

    B. J. Kim, H. Koh, E. Rotenberg, S. J. Oh, H. Eisaki, N. Motoyama, S. Uchida, T. Tohyama, S. Maekawa, Z. X. Shen, and C. Kim, Distinct spinon and holon dispersions in photoemission spectral functions from one-dimensional SrCuO2, Nature Physics2, 397 (2006)

    2006

  32. [32]

    Vijayan, P

    J. Vijayan, P. Sompet, G. Salomon, J. Koepsell, S. Hirthe, A. Bohrdt, F. Grusdt, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Time-resolved observation of spin-charge deconfinement in fermionic Hubbard chains, Science367, 186 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    J. G. Bednorz and K. A. M¨ uller, Possible highT c su- perconductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O system, Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter64, 189 (1986)

    1986

  34. [34]

    S. A. Trugman, Interaction of holes in a Hubbard antifer- romagnet and high-temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B37, 1597 (1988)

    1988

  35. [35]

    C. L. Kane, P. A. Lee, and N. Read, Motion of a single hole in a quantum antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B39, 6880 (1989)

    1989

  36. [36]

    Martinez and P

    G. Martinez and P. Horsch, Spin polarons in the t-J model, Phys. Rev. B44, 317 (1991)

    1991

  37. [37]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2863 (1992)

    1992

  38. [38]

    S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. B48, 10345 (1993)

    1993

  39. [39]

    ¨Ostlund and S

    S. ¨Ostlund and S. Rommer, Thermodynamic Limit of Density Matrix Renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 3537 (1995)

    1995

  40. [40]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group, Rev

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group, Rev. Mod. Phys.77, 259 (2005)

    2005

  41. [41]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011), january 2011 Special Issue

    2011

  42. [42]

    Yang and A

    L. Yang and A. E. Feiguin, From deconfined spinons to coherent magnons in an antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chain with long range interactions, SciPost Phys.10, 110 (2021)

    2021

  43. [43]

    L. Yang, I. Hamad, L. O. Manuel, and A. E. Feiguin, Fate of pairing and spin-charge separation in the presence of long-range antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. B105, 195104 (2022)

    2022

  44. [44]

    S.-H. Lin, M. P. Zaletel, and F. Pollmann, Efficient simu- lation of dynamics in two-dimensional quantum spin sys- tems with isometric tensor networks, Phys. Rev. B106, 245102 (2022)

    2022

  45. [45]

    Drescher, L

    M. Drescher, L. Vanderstraeten, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Dynamical signatures of symmetry-broken and liquid phases in anS= 1 2 Heisenberg antiferromag- 19 net on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B108, L220401 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    Jarrell and J

    M. Jarrell and J. Gubernatis, Bayesian inference and the analytic continuation of imaginary-time quantum Monte Carlo data, Physics Reports269, 133 (1996)

    1996

  47. [47]

    A. W. Sandvik, Stochastic method for analytic continu- ation of quantum Monte Carlo data, Phys. Rev. B57, 10287 (1998)

    1998

  48. [48]

    K. S. D. Beach, Identifying the maximum entropy method as a special limit of stochastic analytic continu- ation (2004), arXiv:cond-mat/0403055

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  49. [49]

    A. W. Sandvik, Constrained sampling method for ana- lytic continuation, Phys. Rev. E94, 063308 (2016)

    2016

  50. [50]

    H. Shao, Y. Q. Qin, S. Capponi, S. Chesi, Z. Y. Meng, and A. W. Sandvik, Nearly Deconfined Spinon Excita- tions in the Square-Lattice Spin-1/2 Heisenberg Antifer- romagnet, Phys. Rev. X7, 041072 (2017)

    2017

  51. [51]

    Shao and A

    H. Shao and A. W. Sandvik, Progress on stochastic ana- lytic continuation of quantum Monte Carlo data, Physics Reports1003, 1 (2023)

    2023

  52. [52]

    Schumm, S

    G. Schumm, S. Yang, and A. W. Sandvik, Cross vali- dation in stochastic analytic continuation, Phys. Rev. E 110, 055307 (2024)

    2024

  53. [53]

    S. Yang, G. Schumm, and A. W. Sandvik, Dynamic struc- ture factor of a spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. B111, 224404 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    Schumm, S

    G. Schumm, S. Zhang, and A. W. Sandvik, Single- particle dispersion and density of states of the half-filled two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B112, 085109 (2025)

    2025

  55. [55]

    S. R. White and A. E. Feiguin, Real-Time Evolution Us- ing the Density Matrix Renormalization Group, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 076401 (2004)

    2004

  56. [56]

    Jeckelmann, Dynamical density-matrix renormalization-group method, Phys

    E. Jeckelmann, Dynamical density-matrix renormalization-group method, Phys. Rev. B66, 045114 (2002)

    2002

  57. [57]

    Yang and A

    S. Yang and A. W. Sandvik (2025), in preparation

    2025

  58. [58]

    Yang and A

    S. Yang and A. W. Sandvik, Spinons and Spin-Charge Separation at the Deconfined Quantum Critical Point (2025), arXiv:2512.02962 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Tang and A

    Y. Tang and A. W. Sandvik, Method to Characterize Spinons as Emergent Elementary Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 157201 (2011)

    2011

  60. [60]

    Tang and A

    Y. Tang and A. W. Sandvik, Confinement and Decon- finement of Spinons in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 217213 (2013)

    2013

  61. [61]

    C. K. Majumdar and D. K. Ghosh, On Next-Nearest- Neighbor Interaction in Linear Chain. II, Journal of Mathematical Physics10, 1399 (1969)

    1969

  62. [62]

    C. K. Majumdar, Antiferromagnetic model with known ground state, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 3, 911 (1970)

    1970

  63. [63]

    Okamoto and K

    K. Okamoto and K. Nomura, Fluid-dimer critical point in S = 1/2 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chain with next nearest neighbor interactions, Physics Letters A169, 433 (1992)

    1992

  64. [64]

    Nomura and K

    K. Nomura and K. Okamoto, Critical properties of S= 1/2 antiferromagnetic XXZ chain with next-nearest- neighbour interactions, Journal of Physics A: Mathemat- ical and General27, 5773 (1994)

    1994

  65. [65]

    Wess and B

    J. Wess and B. Zumino, Consequences of anomalous ward identities, Physics Letters B37, 95 (1971)

    1971

  66. [66]

    Witten, Global aspects of current algebra, Nuclear Physics B223, 422 (1983)

    E. Witten, Global aspects of current algebra, Nuclear Physics B223, 422 (1983)

    1983

  67. [67]

    Witten, Non-abelian bosonization in two dimen- sions, Communications in Mathematical Physics92, 455 (1984)

    E. Witten, Non-abelian bosonization in two dimen- sions, Communications in Mathematical Physics92, 455 (1984)

    1984

  68. [68]

    A. W. Sandvik, Stochastic series expansion method with operator-loop update, Phys. Rev. B59, R14157 (1999)

    1999

  69. [69]

    A. W. Sandvik, Computational Studies of Quantum Spin Systems, AIP Conference Proceedings1297, 135 (2010)

    2010

  70. [70]

    Angelucci, Effective lattice actions for correlated elec- trons, Phys

    A. Angelucci, Effective lattice actions for correlated elec- trons, Phys. Rev. B51, 11580 (1995)

    1995

  71. [71]

    Brunner, F

    M. Brunner, F. F. Assaad, and A. Muramatsu, Single hole dynamics in the one-dimensional t-J model, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems16, 209 (2000)

    2000

  72. [72]

    Brunner, F

    M. Brunner, F. F. Assaad, and A. Muramatsu, Single- hole dynamics in thet−Jmodel on a square lattice, Phys. Rev. B62, 15480 (2000)

    2000

  73. [73]

    E. Y. Loh, J. E. Gubernatis, R. T. Scalettar, S. R. White, D. J. Scalapino, and R. L. Sugar, Sign problem in the nu- merical simulation of many-electron systems, Phys. Rev. B41, 9301 (1990)

    1990

  74. [74]

    slave bosons

    and the other where the amplitudes are also sampled along with the frequenciesω i [48]. The configurational entropies of these parametrizations are different [51, 75], leading to slightly different outcomes for the mean spec- tral density accumulated in a histogram. It is also possi- ble to define the frequenciesω i on a fixed grid and only sample the amp...

  75. [75]

    Y. Q. Qin, B. Normand, A. W. Sandvik, and Z. Y. Meng, Amplitude Mode in Three-Dimensional Dimerized Anti- ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 147207 (2017)

    2017

  76. [76]

    Ghanem and E

    K. Ghanem and E. Koch, Generalized maximum entropy methods as limits of the average spectrum method, Phys. Rev. B108, L201107 (2023)

    2023

  77. [77]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Rig- orous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 799 (1987)

    1987

  78. [78]

    Affleck, T

    I. Affleck, T. Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, and H. Tasaki, Valence bond ground states in isotropic quantum antiferromag- nets, Communications in Mathematical Physics115, 477 (1988)

    1988

  79. [79]

    Yang, D.-X

    S. Yang, D.-X. Yao, and A. W. Sandvik, Deconfined quantum criticality in spin-1/2 chains with long-range interactions (2020), arXiv:2001.02821 [physics.comp-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    R. O. Kuzian, R. Hayn, and J. Richter, Recursion method and one-hole spectral function of the Majumdar-Ghosh model, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems35, 21 (2003)

    2003

Showing first 80 references.