pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.20742 · v4 · pith:5A3JEMPSnew · submitted 2025-11-25 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph

City-level energy and emission assessment based on 20+ million electric vehicle registrations in China

Yanqiao Deng , Minda Ma , Nan Zhou , Hong Yuan , Zhili Ma , Xin Ma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 18:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph
keywords electric vehiclesenergy efficiencycarbon emissionsChinacity-level assessmenttransport decarbonizationEV registrationsemission projections
0
0 comments X

The pith

Real-world tracking of over 20 million EV registrations in 295 Chinese cities shows EVs use 30.9 to 212.8 megajoules less energy per 100 km than internal combustion vehicles, with provincial carbon intensities ranging from 18.2 to 270.4 gCO

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compiles monthly registration records for 586 EV models across 295 cities to build the first city-level map of actual energy consumption and emissions in China's dominant EV market. It establishes that real-world efficiency gains over gasoline vehicles are large yet carbon outcomes remain highly sensitive to local electricity sources, with gasoline hybrids still supplying 44 percent of the energy mix. Forward projections under continued adoption indicate total EV-related CO2 emissions will crest near 2030 at 21 to 31 megatonnes before falling by 2035. A sympathetic reader cares because the numbers replace modeled averages with observed fleet behavior and supply an empirical base for transport decarbonization planning both inside China and elsewhere.

Core claim

Analysis of more than 20 million EV registrations from 2022 to 2024 reveals that electric vehicles are 30.9-212.8 megajoules per 100 km more energy efficient than internal combustion vehicles, yet their carbon intensities span 18.2 to 270.4 gCO2/km across provinces because of differences in grid carbon intensity. Gasoline continues to provide 44 percent of energy use through limited hybrid electrification. Scenario runs project that EV fleet emissions will reach a peak of 21.1-30.9 megatonnes of CO2 around 2030 and then decline by 2035 as market transition proceeds.

What carries the argument

The monthly registration dataset covering 20+ million vehicles and 586 models in 295 cities, which supplies the observed energy-use and emission-intensity values used for both current assessment and 2035 pathway modeling.

If this is right

  • Emissions accounting for road transport can shift from national averages to city- and province-specific intensities derived from real registrations.
  • Policy attention must address large regional gaps in grid cleanliness and EV uptake to avoid locking in high-carbon outcomes in some provinces.
  • Gasoline hybrids will continue to shape total energy demand until full electrification of the light-duty fleet occurs.
  • Continued market transition under present trends produces an emissions peak near 2030 followed by net reductions by 2035.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Faster decarbonization of regional grids could shift the emissions peak earlier or lower than the modeled range.
  • City-level maps could guide targeted charging infrastructure and renewable procurement to maximize per-vehicle emission reductions.
  • Comparable registration-based studies in other major markets would allow direct comparison of efficiency gains and grid-driven emission spreads worldwide.

Load-bearing premise

The sampled registrations from 2022-2024 accurately represent the entire current and future EV fleet while the chosen scenario assumptions on market growth and grid decarbonization capture the dominant future drivers.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of whether national EV-related CO2 emissions actually peak between 21 and 31 megatonnes around 2030 and begin declining by 2035, or instead keep rising past that date.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.20742 by Hong Yuan, Minda Ma, Nan Zhou, Xin Ma, Yanqiao Deng, Zhili Ma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Distribution of EV registrations in China, Jun 2022–Dec 2024. (A) Provincial EV registrations and proportions of BEVs, PHEVs, and EREVs; (B) monthly registrations and YoY growth trends; and (C) registrations by vehicle class segments for various periods [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Real-world energy intensity (EI) distributions and estimates based on RF regression. (A) Empirically derived energy intensity distributions for samples of BEV, PHEV, and EREV models, (B) model fitting results via RF regression, and (C) overall energy intensity distributions of all BEV, PHEV, and EREV class segments after combining empirical samples and RF model predictions. As shown in Figure 2A, the empir… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Real-world average carbon intensities of EVs in China (2022–2024). (A) Provincial heterogeneity of carbon intensities for BEVs, PHEVs, and EREVs; and (B) carbon intensities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: City-level cumulative energy demand of BEVs, PHEVs, and EREVs, June 2022– December 2024. (A) Geographical distribution of city-level energy demand by powertrain; (B) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cumulative proportions of real-world charging electricity for (A) PHEV and (B) EREV models [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Projected CO2 emissions of China’s EV fleet to 2035 under Roadmap 2.0 (a historical outlook benchmark), BAU, and trend-and-policy scenarios for (A) total EVs, (B) BEVs, and (C) PHEVs and EREVs. As shown in Figure 6A, by 2024 total EV emissions has surged to 14.2 megatonnes of CO2 (MtCO2), already exceeding the 2035 target of Roadmap 2.0 by approximately 4 MtCO2. This sharp rise reflects the explosive expan… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

China, the world's largest electric vehicle (EV) market, plays a pivotal role in global decarbonization of the transport sector. We present the first high-resolution assessment of EV adoption in 295 cities, utilizing more than 20 million registrations of 586 EV models tracked monthly from 2022 to 2024 and projecting transition pathways to 2035. Real-world data reveal that EVs are 30.9-212.8 megajoules per 100 km more energy efficient than internal combustion vehicles, yet their carbon intensities range from 18.2 to 270.4 gCO2/km among provinces. The limited electrification of hybrids means that gasoline still accounts for 44% of EV energy use. Scenario projections suggest that emissions will peak about 2030 at 21.1-30.9 megatonnes of CO2 and decline by 2035 under continued market transition. The findings establish an empirical foundation for accurate emissions accounting, emphasize the need to reduce regional disparities in adoptability, and offer globally relevant insights for road-transport decarbonization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes over 20 million EV registrations across 295 Chinese cities from 2022-2024 for 586 models to assess real-world energy efficiency and emissions relative to internal combustion vehicles. It reports EVs are 30.9-212.8 MJ/100 km more efficient, with provincial carbon intensities ranging 18.2-270.4 gCO2/km, notes gasoline still accounts for 44% of EV energy use due to limited hybrid electrification, and projects emissions peaking around 2030 at 21.1-30.9 Mt CO2 before declining by 2035 under continued market transition scenarios.

Significance. If the empirical results hold, the large-scale registration dataset provides a valuable real-world foundation for city-level EV energy and emission accounting in China's dominant market, highlighting regional disparities and the ongoing role of gasoline in EV fleets. This strengthens policy-relevant insights for road transport decarbonization beyond modeled estimates.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and scenario projections] Abstract (final paragraph) and scenario projections section: The headline claim that emissions peak about 2030 at 21.1-30.9 Mt CO2 and decline by 2035 rests on extrapolating 2022-2024 registration patterns and provincial grid mixes under a single 'continued market transition' scenario. No back-testing against pre-2022 data or sensitivity analysis to alternatives (e.g., policy reversal or slower grid decarbonization) is described, which undermines confidence in the timing and magnitude given the high-growth window of the data.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The reported efficiency (30.9-212.8 MJ/100 km) and intensity (18.2-270.4 gCO2/km) ranges would benefit from explicit description of whether they represent min/max across models, cities, or provinces, and how the 44% gasoline share for EV energy use is calculated from the registration data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their valuable comments on our manuscript. We provide a point-by-point response to the major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and scenario projections] Abstract (final paragraph) and scenario projections section: The headline claim that emissions peak about 2030 at 21.1-30.9 Mt CO2 and decline by 2035 rests on extrapolating 2022-2024 registration patterns and provincial grid mixes under a single 'continued market transition' scenario. No back-testing against pre-2022 data or sensitivity analysis to alternatives (e.g., policy reversal or slower grid decarbonization) is described, which undermines confidence in the timing and magnitude given the high-growth window of the data.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the need for greater robustness in our scenario projections. The projections in the manuscript are derived from extrapolating the observed 2022-2024 registration patterns and current provincial grid carbon intensities under a baseline 'continued market transition' scenario, which assumes ongoing EV adoption trends and gradual grid improvements consistent with recent policies. Regarding back-testing, our dataset begins in 2022 as this marks the period of accelerated EV adoption in China following major policy incentives; pre-2022 data would reflect an earlier phase with substantially lower registration volumes and different vehicle models, limiting its utility for validating future projections. Nevertheless, we agree that sensitivity analysis to alternative scenarios would enhance the reliability of the results. In the revised version of the manuscript, we will add sensitivity analyses exploring variations such as slower grid decarbonization and potential policy shifts to better bound the uncertainty in the projected emissions peak timing and magnitude. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are direct empirical calculations from registration data

full rationale

The paper computes EV energy efficiency gains (30.9-212.8 MJ/100 km) and provincial carbon intensities (18.2-270.4 gCO2/km) directly from the 20+ million registration records, 586 models, and grid data for 2022-2024. Scenario projections to 2035 under continued market transition apply these observed baselines forward without any indication that target outputs (peak timing or magnitude) were used to fit or define the input parameters. No self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or smuggled ansatzes appear in the derivation chain described. The central claims remain independent of the authors' own prior results and rest on external registration and grid datasets.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The assessment rests on representativeness of the registration sample and on scenario assumptions for future adoption and grid carbon intensity; no new physical entities or ad-hoc constants are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The sampled 20+ million registrations accurately represent the full population of EVs in the 295 cities.
    Invoked to generalize measured efficiency and carbon intensity values to city-level totals.
  • domain assumption Future EV adoption and electricity grid decarbonization will follow the continued market transition scenario.
    Required for the 2030 peak and 2035 decline projection.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5731 in / 1457 out tokens · 39415 ms · 2026-05-21T18:19:19.809441+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ma, C., Peñ asco, C., and Anadó n, L.D. (2025). Technology innovation and environmental outcomes of road transportation policy instruments. Nature Communications 16, 4467. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59111-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59111-8 2025

  2. [2]

    Global EV Outlook 2025

    International Energy Agency (IEA) (2025). Global EV Outlook 2025. IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2025

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S

    Climate Working Group (2025). A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate. Washington DC: Climate Worki ng Group, U.S. Department of Energy. July 23, 2025. https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2025- 07/DOE_Critical_Review_of_Impacts_of_GHG_Emissions_on_the_US_Climate_July _2025.pdf

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    -P., and van der Ploeg, R

    Arezki, R., Landau, J. -P., and van der Ploeg, R. (2024). Why the EU must reset its Green Deal—or be left behind. Nature 636, 42-44. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024- 03918-w

    work page doi:10.1038/d41586-024- 2024

  5. [5]

    Liu, M., Hao, H., Sun, X., Geng, Y., Reiner, D., Hubacek, K., Qu, X., Lu, J., You, F., and Zhao, F. (2025). The potential for differentiated vehicle segment tariffs. Nature Energy 10, 1042-1044. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-025-01798-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41560-025-01798-6 2025

  6. [6]

    Dan, Z., Song, A., Zheng, Y., Zhang, X., and Zhou, Y. (2025). City information models for optimal EV charging and energy -resilient renaissance. Nexus 2(1), 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynexs.2025.100056

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ynexs.2025.100056 2025

  7. [7]

    Shen, Y.-S., Huang, G.-T., Chang-Chien, C.-L., Huang, L.H., Kuo, C.-H., and Hu, A.H. (2023). The impact of passenger electric vehicles on carbon reduction and environmental impact under the 2050 net zero policy in Taiwan. Energy Policy 183, 113838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113838

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113838 2023

  8. [8]

    Plö tz, P., Moll, C., Bieker, G., and Mock, P. (2021). From lab -to-road: Real-world fuel consumption and CO 2 emissions of plug -in hybrid electric vehicles. Environmental Research Letters 16(5), 054078. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abef8c

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abef8c 2021

  9. [9]

    Xia, Y., Liao, C., Chen, X., Zhu, Z., Chen, X., Wang, L., Jiang, R., Stettler, M.E.J., Angeloudis, P., and Gao, Z. (2023). Future reductions of China’s transport emissions 31 impacted by changing driving behaviour. Nature Sustainability 6, 1228 -1236. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01173-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41893-023-01173-x 2023

  10. [10]

    Wang, A., Xu, J., Zhang, M., Zhai, Z., Song, G., and Hatzopoulou, M. (2022). Emissions and fuel consumption of a hybrid electric vehicle in rea l-world metropolitan traffic conditions. Applied Energy 306, 118077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118077

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118077 2022

  11. [11]

    Yang, S., Wen, W., and Zhou, P. (2024). Heterogeneous electric vehicle m arket resilience and underlying contributors: Evidence from China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 129, 104111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104111

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trd.2024.104111 2024

  12. [12]

    Zhang, D., Gao, J., Tang, D., Wu, X., Shi, J., Chen, J., Peng, Y., Zhang, S., and Wu, Y. (2021). Switching on auxiliary devices in vehicular fuel efficiency tests can help cut CO2 emissions by millions of tons. One Earth 4(1), 135 -145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.12.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.12.010 2021

  13. [13]

    Peng, L., Liu, F., Zhou, M., Li, M., Zhang, Q., and Mauzerall, D.L. (2021). Alternative - energy-vehicles deployment delivers climate, air quality, and health co -benefits when coupled with decarbonizing power generation in China. One Earth 4, 1127 -1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.07.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.07.007 2021

  14. [14]

    Lu, Q., Duan, H., Shi, H., Peng, B., Liu, Y., Wu, T., Du, H., and Wan g, S. (2022). Decarbonization scenarios and carbon reduction potential for China’s road transportation by 2060. npj Urban Sustainability 2, 34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949- 022-00079-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s42949- 2022

  15. [15]

    Zhong, H., Chen, K., Liu, C., Zhu, M., and Ke, R. (2024). Models for predicting vehicle emissions: A comprehensive review. Science of The Total Environment 923, 171324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171324

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171324 2024

  16. [16]

    Sui, Y., Zhang, H., Song, X., Shao, F., Yu, X., Shibasaki, R., Sun, R., Yuan, M., Wang, C., Li, S., and Li, Y. (2019). GPS data in urban online ride -hailing: A comparative analysis on fuel consumption and emissions. Journal of Clea ner Production 227, 495-

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.159. 32

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.159 2019

  18. [18]

    Jiang, P., Zhong, X., and Li, L. (2020). On -road vehicle emission inventory and its spatio-temporal variations in North China Plain. Environmental Pollution 267, 115639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115639

    work page doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115639 2020

  19. [19]

    Liu, R., He, H.-d., Zhang, Z., Wu, C.-l., Yang, J.-m., Zhu, X.-h., and Peng, Z.-r. (2023). Integrated MOVES model and machine learning method for prediction of CO2 and NO from light -duty gasoline vehicle. Journal of Cleaner Production 422, 138612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138612

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138612 2023

  20. [20]

    Cheng, A.L., Fuchs, E.R.H., and Michalek, J.J. (2024). US industrial policy may reduce electric vehicle battery supply chain vulnerabilities and influence technology choice. Nature Energy 9, 1561-1570. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-024-01649-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41560-024-01649-w 2024

  21. [21]

    Wang, M., Cai, H., Ou, L., Elgowainy, A., Alam, Md R., Benavides, P.T., Benvenutti, L., Burnham, A., Do, T.N., Farhad, M., et al. (2024). Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies (GREET) Model ® (2024 Excel). Argonne National Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.11578/GREET-Excel-2024/dc.20241203.1

    work page doi:10.11578/greet-excel-2024/dc.20241203.1 2024

  22. [22]

    Ben Dror, M., Qin, L., and An, F. (2019). T he gap between certified and real -world passenger vehicle fuel consumption in China measured using a mobile phone application data. Energy Policy 128, 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.039

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.039 2019

  23. [23]

    Gó mez Vilchez, J.J., and Jochem, P. (2020). Powertrain technologies and their impact on greenhouse gas emissions in key car markets. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 80, 102214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.102214

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trd.2019.102214 2020

  24. [24]

    Al-Wreikat, Y., Serrano, C., and Sodré , J.R. (2022). Effects of ambient temperature and trip characteristics on the energy consumption of an electric vehic le. Energy 238, 122028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122028

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.122028 2022

  25. [25]

    Yuan, X., He, J., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Ma, Y., Bao, B., Gu, L., Li, L., Zhang, H., Jin, Y., and Sun, L. (2024). Data -driven e valuation of electric vehicle energy consumption for generalizing standard testing to real -world driving. Patterns 5, 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2024.100950

    work page doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.100950 2024

  26. [26]

    Yuan, H., Ma, M., Z hou, N., Deng, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, S., and Ma, Z. (2026). Planning future charging infrastructure for private EVs: A city -scale assessment of demand and 33 capacity. Advances in Applied Energy 21, 100258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2025.100258

    work page doi:10.1016/j.adapen.2025.100258 2026

  27. [27]

    Hu, D., Zhou, K., Hu, R., and Yang, J. (2024). Provincial inequalities in life cycle carbon dioxide emissions and air pollutants from electric vehicles in China. Communications Earth & Environment 5, 726. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01906-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01906-6 2024

  28. [28]

    Mai, L., Liu, M., Hao, H., Sun, X., Meng, F., Geng, Y., Wadud, Z., Tate, J.E., Dong, Z., Li, H., et al. (2025). A high -resolution dataset on el ectric passenger vehicle characteristics in China and the European Union. Scientific Data 12, 1449. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05770-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05770-7 2025

  29. [29]

    Hu, X., Zhang, X., Liu, B., and Jiang, M. (2025). Subsidies, charging infrastructure, and the promotion of electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 147, 104960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.104960

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trd.2025.104960 2025

  30. [30]

    Zhao, X., Li, X., Jiao, D., Mao, Y., Sun, J., and Liu, G. (2024). Policy incentives and electric vehicle adoption in China: From a perspective of policy mixes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 190, 104235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104235

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tra.2024.104235 2024

  31. [31]

    Gan, Y., Lu, Z., He, X., Hao, C., Wang, Y., Cai, H., Wang, M., Elgowainy, A., Przesmitzki, S., and Bouchard, J. (2021). Provincial greenhouse gas emissions of gasoline and plug -in elect ric vehicles in China: Comparison from the consumption - based electricity perspective. Environmental Science & Technology 55, 6944 -6956. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08217

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c08217 2021

  32. [32]

    Jiang, Z., and Xu, C. (2023). Policy incentives, government subsidies, and technological innovation in new energy vehicle enterprises: Evidence from China. Energy Policy 177, 113527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113527

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113527 2023

  33. [33]

    Falter, C., Wolff, S., and Jaensch, M. (2025). Combining electrification and alternative fuels: an effective strategy to decarbonize the car sector. npj Sustainable Mobility and Transport 2, 38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44333-025-00051-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s44333-025-00051-7 2025

  34. [34]

    Zhang, B., Chalise, D., Zeng, Y., Shen, F., Tucker, M., Kaur, S., Dames, C., and Prasher, R. (2025). Solid -state batteries enabled by ultra-high-frequency self-heating. Joule 9, 101973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2025.101973. 34

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joule.2025.101973 2025

  35. [35]

    Gong, C.C., Ueckerdt, F., Bertram, C., Yin, Y., Bantje, D., Pietzcker, R., Hoppe, J., Hasse, R., Pehl, M., Moreno -Leiva, S., et al. (2025). Multilevel emission impacts of electrification and coal pathways in China’s net -zero transition. Joule 9, 101945 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2025.101945

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joule.2025.101945 2025

  36. [36]

    Global EV Outlook 2024

    International Energy Agency (IEA) (2024). Global EV Outlook 2024. IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2024

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Zhang, Q., Gu, B., Zhang, H., and Ji, Q. (2 023). Emission reduction mode of China's provincial transportation sector: Based on “Energy+” carbon efficiency evaluation. Energy Policy 177, 113556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113556

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113556 2023

  38. [38]

    Wu, Z., Wang, C., Wolfram, P., Zhang, Y., Sun, X., and Hertwich, E. (2019). Assessing electric vehicle policy with region -specific carbon footprints. Applied Energy 256, 113923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113923

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113923 2019

  39. [39]

    Deng, Y., Ma, M., Zhou, N., Zou, C., Ma, Z., Yan, R., and Ma, X. (2025). Provincial allocation of China's commercial building operational carbon toward carbon neutrality. Applied Energy 384, 125450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125450

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125450 2025

  40. [40]

    Bai, J., Chang, I.S., Zhang, C., and Wu, J. (2024). Allocation of CO 2 emission target in China under the “1 + N” policy: Considering natural carbon sinks and wind-solar- hydropower endowments. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 106, 107472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107472

    work page doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107472 2024

  41. [41]

    Knobloch, F., Hanssen, S.V., Lam, A., Pollitt, H., Salas, P., Chewpreecha, U., Huijbregts, M.A.J., and Mercure, J. -F. (2020). Net emission reductions from electric cars and heat pumps in 59 world regions over time. Nature Sustainability 3, 437-447. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0488-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0488-7 2020

  42. [42]

    Cao, P., Liu, Z., Zhang, H., and Wei, L. (2024). The impact of agglomeration on CO 2 emissions in China's transport sector: A spatial econometric analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society 117, 105966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105966

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scs.2024.105966 2024

  43. [43]

    Xu, M., Zhang, S., Li, P., Weng, Z., Xie, Y., and Lan, Y. (2024). Energy-related carbon emission reduction pathways in Northwest China towards carbon neutrality goal. Applied Energy 358, 122547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122547. 35

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122547 2024

  44. [44]

    Alexander, S., and Abraham, J. (2024). Making sense of life cycle assessment results of electrified vehicle s. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 199, 114470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114470

    work page doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114470 2024

  45. [45]

    Yuan, H., Ma, M., Zhou, N., Xie, H., Ma, Z., Xiang, X., and Ma, X. (2024). Battery electric vehicle charging in China: Energy demand and emissions trends in the 2020s. Applied Energy 365, 123153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123153

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123153 2024

  46. [46]

    , Meng, K., and Dong, Z.Y

    Wu, Y.A., Ng, A.W., Yu, Z., Huang, J. , Meng, K., and Dong, Z.Y. (2021). A review of evolutionary policy incentives for sustainable development of electric vehicles in China: Strategic implications. Energy Policy 148, 111983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111983

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111983 2021

  47. [47]

    Mersha, M., Lam, K., Wood, J., AlShami, A.K., and Kalita, J. (2024). Explainable artificial intelligence: A survey of needs, techniques, applications, and future direction. Neurocomputing 599, 128111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128111

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128111 2024

  48. [48]

    Global EV Data Explorer

    International Energy Agency (IEA) (2025). Global EV Data Explorer. IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/global-ev-data-explorer

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Dauphin, R., Prevost, V., Degeilh, P., Melgar, J., Fittavolini, C., Smith, A., Callu, C., Chrysafi, S., Uitz-Choi, R., and Kar, K. (2023). Evaluation of plug -in hybrid vehicles in real-world conditions by simulation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 119, 103721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103721

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trd.2023.103721 2023

  50. [50]

    Pozzato, G., Allam, A., Pulvirenti, L., Negoita, G.A., Paxton, W.A., and Onori, S. (2023). Analysis and key findings from real-world electric vehicle field data. Joule 7, 2035-2053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2023.07.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joule.2023.07.018 2023

  51. [51]

    Wang, Y., Wen, Y., Zhu, Q., Luo, J., Yang, Z., Su, S., Wang, X., Hao, L., Tan, J., Yin, H., and Ge, Y. (2022). Real driving energy consumption and CO 2 & pollutant emission characteristics of a parallel plug -in hybrid electric vehicle under different propulsion modes. Energy 244, 123076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.123076

    work page doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.123076 2022

  52. [52]

    Utility factor curves under different test cycles

    International Energy Agency (IEA) (2021). Utility factor curves under different test cycles. IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/utility-factor-curves- under-different-test-cycles. 36

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Borlaug, B., Salisbury, S., Gerdes, M., and Muratori, M. (2020). Levelized cost of charging electric vehicles in the United States. Joule 4, 1470 -1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.013 2020

  54. [54]

    Wu, J., Powell, S., Xu, Y., Rajagopal, R., and Gonzalez, M.C. (2024). Planning charging stations for 2050 to support flexible electric vehicle demand considering individual mobility patterns. Ce ll Reports Sustainability 1, 100006 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2023.100006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.crsus.2023.100006 2024

  55. [55]

    National Standard of the People's Republic of China. (2021). Test methods for energy consumption of light -duty hybrid electric vehicles. Standard GB/T 19753 -2021. State Administration for Market Regulation. Beijing: China Standard Press. https://www.ndls.org.cn/standard/detail/73223a3eccac113a5fc9f5354756b88d

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    Chen, W., Sun, X., Liu, L., Liu, X., Zhang, R., Zhang, S., Xue, J., Sun, Q., Wang, M., Li, X., et al. (2022). Carbon neutrality of China’s passenger car sector requires coordinated short-term behavioral changes and long-term technological solutions. One Earth 5, 875-891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.07.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2022.07.005 2022

  57. [57]

    Sheldon, T.L., and Dua, R. (2025). A perspective on the evolving plug-in electric vehicle landscape amid trade tariffs and strategic responses. Energy Research & Social Science 127, 104327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104327

    work page doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104327 2025

  58. [58]

    Xu, X., Han, X., Lu, L., Wang, F., Yang, M., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Tang, S., Hou, Y., Hou, J., et al. (2024). Challenges and opportunities toward long -life lithium -ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources 603, 234445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234445

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234445 2024

  59. [59]

    China Society of Automotive Engineers. (2020). Energy -saving and New Energy Vehicle Technology Roadmap, 2.0 Edition. China Machine Press. https://en.sae- china.org/a3967.html

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    Global Energy and Climate Model

    International Energy Agency (IEA) (2024). Global Energy and Climate Model. IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-and-climate-model

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Wu, Y., Zhang, W., Rui, X., Ren, D., Xu, C., Liu, X., Feng, X., Ma, Z., Lu, L., and Ouyang, M. (2025). Thermal runaway mechanism of composite cathodes for all -solid-state 37 batteries. Advanced Energy Materials 15, 2405183. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202405183

    work page doi:10.1002/aenm.202405183 2025