Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Collective Magnetic Excitations in a Photo-excited Electron-doped Cuprate Superconductor

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Ultrafast light generates a population of magnetic excitations in an optimally electron-doped cuprate and reshapes their momentum-dependent spectrum while leaving the magnetic exchange energy unchanged.

desk verdict Credible trRIXS result with a direct anti-Stokes signature, but the dispersion-softening claims rest on a fit model that can create the effect. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.22054 v2 pith:2VWKXJ6Y submitted 2025-11-27 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Daniel Jost , Jiarui Li , Jordyn Hales , Jonathan Sobota , Giacomo Merzoni , Leonardo Martinelli , Shuhan Ding , Kejun Xu
show 16 more authors
Justine Schlappa Andreas Scherz Robert Carley Benjamin E. Van Kuiken Teguh C. Asmara Le Phuong Hoang Laurent Mercadier Sergii Parchenko Martin Teichmann Patrick S. Kirchmann Giacomo Ghiringhelli Brian Moritz Zhi-Xun Shen Thomas P. Devereaux Yao Wang Wei-Sheng Lee
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el PACS 78.70.Ck74.25.Gz75.30.Ds
keywords time-resolvedresonantinelasticX-rayscatteringparamagnonacousticplasmonelectron-dopedcuprateNCCOanti-Stokesnon-equilibriummagnetismHubbardmodelexactdiagonalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show what happens to the collective spin and charge modes of an optimally electron-doped cuprate superconductor when a femtosecond 400-nanometer pulse drives it out of equilibrium. Using time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering at the Cu L3 edge, the authors observe an anti-Stokes signal that they attribute to a substantial light-induced paramagnon population. That population broadens the magnetic excitation and shifts its apparent peak near the zone center, while the overall bandwidth remains fixed - evidence, they argue, that the spin-exchange interaction is not renormalized by the pump. They also find that the acoustic plasmon loses energy and spectral weight, and that the spin and charge responses rise and recover together on a sub-picosecond timescale. If correct, the work shows that light can inject and redistribute collective magnetic modes without destroying the magnetic coupling, which could open new ways to manipulate correlated materials and excite mobile magnons.

What carries the argument

The central tool is time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (trRIXS) at the Cu L3 edge, which gives simultaneous access to the paramagnon and the acoustic plasmon in energy and momentum with about 120 meV resolution and about 150 fs time resolution. The analysis relies on a deliberately minimal fitting model: a Gaussian for the paramagnon is allowed to cross zero energy loss, because the fluctuation-dissipation theorem no longer holds in the pumped state and the anti-Stokes weight appears as a broadened, shifted Gaussian rather than a distinct peak. On the theory side, time-dependent exact diagonalization of a 12-site single-band Hubbard model (U=8t, t'=-0.3t) computes the time-res

What would settle it

Fit the same pumped spectra with a lineshape that explicitly separates Stokes and anti-Stokes components (for example, an asymmetric function consistent with the fluctuation-dissipation relation or a two-Gaussian model), and check whether the zone-center peak position at q approx 0.085 r.l.u. still shifts by ~20%. If the peak remains at its equilibrium energy once anti-Stokes weight is modeled separately, the dispersion modification is a fitting artifact; if the shift persists, the dispersion change is real. A second check is fluence dependence: the anti-Stokes population should grow with pump

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At equilibrium, the RIXS spectrum of optimally electron-doped NCCO shows a dispersive paramagnon with a bandwidth of roughly 400 meV and a fast acoustic plasmon near the zone center. After a 400 nm pump, the spectrum develops energy-gain weight down to about -0.3 eV at q=0.33 r.l.u., which the authors read as anti-Stokes scattering from a photo-generated paramagnon population. Fits to the pumped spectra show an apparent ~20% softening of the paramagnon near the zone center, no change at the zone boundary, and a momentum-dependent spectral-weight change that crosses sign near q approx 0.2 r.l.u. The authors stress that the unchanged zone-boundary energy implies the exchange coupling is unchan

Load-bearing premise

The reported zone-center softening rests on fitting the pumped paramagnon with a single Gaussian that crosses zero energy loss; because adding anti-Stokes weight near zero energy naturally broadens and shifts such a Gaussian, the ~20% softening may be created by the fit model rather than being an intrinsic change in the dispersion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 400 nm pump with roughly 0.6 absorbed photons per unit cell creates a measurable paramagnon population, seen as anti-Stokes weight up to about -0.3 eV.
  • The paramagnon bandwidth stays fixed after pumping, so the superexchange coupling along the measured direction is not significantly altered by the pump.
  • Paramagnon spectral weight is redistributed in momentum: enhanced at low momentum and depleted beyond about q=0.2 r.l.u., which could be used to selectively populate certain spin-fluctuation wavevectors.
  • The acoustic plasmon's energy and spectral weight decrease, opposite to the expected effect of simple electron doping, indicating a nonthermal redistribution of charge carriers.
  • The spin and charge collective responses are time-locked, showing that spin-charge intertwining persists out of equilibrium.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the anti-Stokes paramagnon signal is genuine, it should grow monotonically with pump fluence while the apparent zone-center softening tracks the anti-Stokes fraction; scanning fluence would separate a population effect from a true dispersion change.
  • The unchanged bandwidth implies light control of magnetism in cuprates works through population and momentum redistribution rather than exchange renormalization - an expectation that could be tested in other doped Mott insulators.
  • The time-locked spin-charge response suggests a single energy-redistribution channel, possibly light-induced charge transfer; measuring at the oxygen K-edge or in three-dimensional momentum would test whether the same exciton underlies both the paramagnon gain and the plasmon loss.
  • The claim that light can excite mobile magnons is an extrapolation beyond NCCO; materials with longer magnetic correlation lengths and lower damping would be the natural place to look for persistent light-induced magnon transport.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (trRIXS) measurements on optimally electron-doped NCCO (x=0.15) after a 400 nm pump. The central experimental claims are: (i) a pump-induced anti-Stokes signal at q∥=0.33 r.l.u., interpreted as a large transient paramagnon population; (ii) an apparent ~20% softening of the paramagnon peak near the zone center (q∥=-0.085 r.l.u.) with the zone-boundary peak and overall bandwidth unchanged; (iii) a momentum-dependent change in paramagnon spectral weight across the Brillouin zone; and (iv) a simultaneous softening and spectral-weight reduction of the acoustic plasmon, with time traces locked to the paramagnon response. The authors support these observations with exact-diagonalization simulations of the single-band Hubbard model (with parameters from prior literature) and trRIXS calculations. They argue that the data show robust spin and charge collective excitations under strong photoexcitation, with no significant change to the magnetic exchange coupling.

Significance. If the central findings are correct, this would be a notable advance: it would constitute one of the first direct, momentum-resolved observations of light-induced paramagnon generation in a cuprate, plus a simultaneous view of charge collective modes in the same non-equilibrium state. The raw anti-Stokes tail at q∥=0.33 r.l.u. and the unchanged zone-boundary peak position are direct observations that do not rely on the fitting model. The theoretical modeling uses literature Hubbard parameters (U=8th, t'h=-0.3th, th=400 meV) rather than fitting to the target data, and the authors provide both dynamical spin-structure-factor and full trRIXS simulations, which strengthens the interpretation. However, the quantitative claims of a ~20% near-zone-center softening and a momentum-dependent spectral-weight redistribution depend on an ad-hoc lineshape model whose assumptions are not independently validated; these claims are central to the paper's message and the abstract's wording. The paper would be fully convincing for the raw-spectral-weight observations but currently overreaches in its dispersion-modification statement.

major comments (4)
  1. [Methods E; Fig. 3c-e] The reported ~20% paramagnon softening and the momentum-dependent spectral-weight changes in Fig. 3e are obtained by fitting the pumped-state spectra with a single Gaussian that crosses zero energy loss. Because the fluctuation-dissipation theorem is not valid in the pumped state, this Gaussian is an ad-hoc model, and the authors explicitly acknowledge that the softening 'is mostly due to the substantial anti-Stokes fraction' (main text near Fig. 3d). Adding anti-Stokes weight to a single Gaussian will automatically pull the centroid toward zero and broaden the peak, exactly mimicking an intrinsic dispersion change. The abstract's statement that the pump 'modifies the paramagnon dispersion near the zone center' is therefore not supported by the current analysis. The authors should either (a) fit with an explicit two-component model with separate Stokes and anti-Stokes peaks and linked pa
  2. [Extended Data Fig. 3] The fitting model is not a single universal functional form: at q∥≥0.23 r.l.u., an additional Gaussian is needed to describe the paramagnon line shape. This means the momentum-dependence of the fitted spectral weight in Fig. 3e integrates areas from a model whose number of components changes with momentum. The momentum-dependent spectral-weight transfer (positive at small q, negative at large q) could be an artifact of the fitting procedure rather than a real redistribution. The authors should demonstrate robustness by also presenting raw-intensity integrals over fixed energy windows, or by adopting a consistent non-equilibrium lineshape with the same number of components across all momenta.
  3. [Fig. 5 and Methods E (Extended Data Figs. 4-5)] For the plasmon analysis, the width was fixed to the pre-time-zero value for all post-pump spectra because a free fit produced a decreasing width that the authors judged unphysical. This constraint is load-bearing for the reported plasmon spectral-weight reduction: if the width is allowed to vary, the area and peak position could change significantly. The authors should show the results of the unconstrained fit, or provide a quantitative physical argument for why the width cannot decrease, before the plasmon softening and spectral-weight-reduction claims can be considered robust.
  4. [Abstract and Discussion] The abstract and title emphasize a 'modified dispersion' and 'spectral-weight transfer' as the main results. Given the acknowledged fit dependence of both quantities, the central message overstates the evidence. The raw anti-Stokes signal and the robustness of the high-q peak are the strongest experimental findings; the paper should be restructured so that these direct observations are the headline, with the softening and spectral-weight changes presented as model-dependent interpretations.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title/header] The first line of the full text contains a typo: 'Photo-excited E lectron-doped' should be 'Photo-excited Electron-doped'.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] Panel d is described as 'Integrated I' but the text refers to it as the time trace of quasi-elastic peak intensity; clarifying the integration window (already given in the text as ±60 meV) in the caption would help.
  3. [Methods E] The phrase 'the anti-Stoke scattering effect' should be 'anti-Stokes' for consistency with the rest of the manuscript.
  4. [References] Reference [37] is listed as 'J. S. et al.' with incomplete author names; please provide the full author list for the h-RIXS instrument paper.
  5. [Abstract] The abstract says 'modifies the paramagnon dispersion near the zone center, although the bandwidth remained unchanged.' This is internally consistent with the apparent softening, but the word 'modifies' implies an intrinsic change; rephrasing as 'appears to modify' would align with the caveats in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Central anti-Stokes observation is raw data and the theory is not fitted to target spectra; the acknowledged single-Gaussian fit creates an apparent near-zone-center softening, but the paper explicitly does not present that as an intrinsic exchange change.

full rationale

No circular step can be exhibited from the paper's own equations or citations. The primary experimental result—anti-Stokes spectral weight in EL<0 extending to about -0.3 eV at q=0.33 r.l.u.—is direct raw data (Fig. 3a), not an output of a fitted parameter. The dispersion comparison is extracted by fitting, but the paper explicitly states the near-zone-center softening is apparent: 'the paramagnon peak position softens mostly due to the substantial anti-Stokes fraction in the overall paramagnon spectral weight.' This is an acknowledged model dependence (Methods E: 'we adopted the simplest model to fit the paramagnon and plasmon with a Gaussian by allowing the peak to cross the zero energy'), not a hidden reduction; the Gaussian is a fitting convention, not a prediction derived from itself. The theoretical support (time-dependent exact diagonalization and trRIXS calculations) uses Hubbard parameters 'U = 8 th, t'h = -0.3th, and th = 400 meV, following Ref. 38' and is used qualitatively; it is not fitted to the measured spectra, so no fitted input is renamed as a prediction. Self-citations (Refs. 29, 34, 38) supply previously published formulas, parameter choices, and prior calculations rather than a uniqueness theorem that forbids alternatives; therefore they are not load-bearing circularity. The unchanged-bandwidth claim rests on the zone-boundary peak position, which is insensitive to anti-Stokes weight and directly observed. Overall the derivation chain is self-contained for the central claims; the single-Gaussian caveat is a correctness/robustness concern, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or entities. Its quantitative claims rest on two free modeling choices (Hubbard parameters and the ED doping level) plus an explicitly acknowledged non-equilibrium fitting assumption. The absorbed-photon-density estimate is a derived quantity from a reflectivity fit rather than a free parameter of the central physics.

free parameters (2)
  • Hubbard parameters U, t'h, th = U = 8 th, t'h = -0.3 th, th = 400 meV
    Taken from Ref. 38 (prior literature), not fitted to this dataset. These control the calculated paramagnon energy scale in Fig. 4; the qualitative agreement would change if they do not describe NCCO.
  • Electron doping in ED cluster = 16.7%
    Methods F state this is the minimal doping achievable on the 12-site cluster with SU(2) symmetry. It differs from the experimental x = 0.15, so the simulation is only qualitative.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Single-band Hubbard model with Peierls substitution describes NCCO and the 400 nm pump (Eqs. 1-2).
    Invoked in Methods F/G; the doublon-scrambling mechanism and the simulated S(q,ω,t) depend on this model being an adequate description of optimally doped NCCO.
  • ad hoc to paper Non-equilibrium S(q,ω) can be qualitatively approximated by a Gaussian-over-zero-energy fit for paramagnon and plasmon.
    Methods E and Extended Data Fig. 2: the authors state the fluctuation-dissipation theorem is not valid in the photo-excited state and adopt the 'simplest model'. The near-zone-center softening and spectral-weight changes are extracted under this assumption.
  • domain assumption The absorbed photon density (~0.6 photons per unit cell) is estimated from angle-dependent Fresnel reflectivity with n = 1.76(3), k = 0.59(2).
    Methods C/D use this estimate to argue the pump is intense yet the bandwidth is unchanged; it assumes no transient optical property changes during the pump pulse.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Collective Magnetic Excitations in a Photo-excited Electron-doped Cuprate Superconductor." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2VWKXJ6Y

@misc{pith2026251122054,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Collective Magnetic Excitations in a Photo-excited Electron-doped Cuprate Superconductor},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2VWKXJ6Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.22054}
}
abstract

Elucidating the microscopic behavior of cuprates under ultrafast photoexcitation offers critical insights into their highly correlated out-of-equilibrium states. Although quasiparticle dynamics have been investigated extensively, the behavior of collective magnetic excitations remains comparatively unexplored. Here, we use time-resolved resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (trRIXS) at the Cu $L_3$-edge to track the collective magnetic excitations (paramagnons) in an optimally electron-doped cuprate driven out-of-equilibrium by a femtosecond pump laser pulse. Upon pumping, we observed an anti-Stokes signal associated with paramagnon generation, which modifies the paramagnon dispersion near the zone center, although the bandwidth remained unchanged. Moreover, the spectral weight exhibits a momentum-dependent variation across the Brillouin zone. The light-driven boost of the paramagnon population and the resulting spectral-weight transfer could provide new leverage to manipulate the properties of cuprates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.22054 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    For a direct transition, the dipole operator reads as Dqε = ∑ iασ e−iq·ri(Mαεc† iσpiασ + h.c.)

    ˆDqiεi (t1)⟩ (5) where q = qi − qs (ω = ωi − ωs) is the momentum (energy) transfer between incident and scattered pho- tons, and l(t) = e−t/τcoreθ(τ ) the core-hole decay life- time. For a direct transition, the dipole operator reads as Dqε = ∑ iασ e−iq·ri(Mαεc† iσpiασ + h.c.). We further select combination of π − σ polarizations for incident and scatteri...

  2. [2]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, and D. Hsieh, To- wards properties on demand in quantum materials, Nature Materials 16, 1077 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    Keimer, S

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, From quantum matter to high- temperature superconductivity in copper oxides, Nature 518, 179 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    with λ = 13 eV [42, 43]. The trRIXS cross-section reads as [ 29] I(q, ωs, ωi, t) = 1 2πN ∫ ∫ ∫ ∫ dt1dt2dt′ 1dt′ 2eiωi(t2−t1)−iωs(t′ 2−t′ 1) ×g(t1; t)g(t2; t)l(t′ 1 − t1)l(t′ 2 − t2) ×⟨ ˆD† qiεi (t2) ˆDqsεs (t′

  5. [5]

    Y. H. Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N. Gedik, Observation of floquet-bloch states on the sur- face of a topological insulator, Science 342, 453 (2013) , https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1239834

    doi:10.1126/science.1239834 2013

  6. [6]

    Y. Wang, M. Claassen, C. D. Pemmaraju, C. Jia, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Theoretical understanding of photon spectroscopies in cor- related materials in and out of equilibrium, Nature Reviews Materials 3, 312 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Giannetti, M

    C. Giannetti, M. Capone, D. Fausti, M. Fabrizio, F. Parmigiani, and D. Mihailovic, Ultrafast optical spectroscopy of strongly correlated materials and high- temperature superconductors: a non-equilibrium approach, Advances in Physics 65, 58 (2016) , https://doi.org/10.1080/00018732.2016.1194044

    arXiv 2016

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Zonno, F

    M. Zonno, F. Boschini, and A. Damascelli, Time- resolved arpes on cuprates: Tracking the low- energy electrodynamics in the time domain, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 251, 147091 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Mankowsky, A

    R. Mankowsky, A. Subedi, M. F¨ orst, S. O. Mariager, M. Chollet, H. T. Lemke, J. S. Robinson, J. M. Glow- nia, M. P. Minitti, A. Frano, M. Fechner, N. A. Spaldin, T. Loew, B. Keimer, A. Georges, and A. Cavalleri, Non- linear lattice dynamics as a basis for enhanced supercon- d...

    2014

  3. [11]

    F¨ orst, R

    M. F¨ orst, R. I. Tobey, H. Bromberger, S. B. Wilkins, V. Khanna, A. D. Caviglia, Y.-D. Chuang, W. S. Lee, W. F. Schlotter, J. J. Turner, M. P. Minitti, O. Krupin, Z. J. Xu, J. S. Wen, G. D. Gu, S. S. Dhesi, A. Cavalleri, and J. P. Hill, Melting of charge stripes in vibrationa...

    2014

  4. [12]

    Mitrano, S

    M. Mitrano, S. Lee, A. A. Husain, L. Delacretaz, M. Zhu, G. de la Pe˜ na Munoz, S. X.-L. Sun, Y. I. Joe, A. H. Reid, S. F. Wandel, G. Coslovich, W. Schlotter, T. van Driel, J. Schneeloch, G. D. Gu, S. Hartnoll, N. Golden- feld, and P. Abbamonte, Ultrafast time-resolved x-ray s...

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    H. Jang, S. Song, T. Kihara, Y. Liu, S.-J. Lee, S.-Y. Park, M. Kim, H.-D. Kim, G. Coslovich, S. Nakata, Y. Kubota, I. Inoue, K. Tamasaku, M. Yabashi, H. Lee, C. Song, H. Nojiri, B. Keimer, C.-C. Kao, and J.-S. Lee, Characterization of photoinduced normal state through charge d...

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    Wandel, F

    S. Wandel, F. Boschini, E. H. da Silva Neto, L. Shen, M. X. Na, S. Zohar, Y. Wang, S. B. Welch, M. H. Seaberg, J. D. Koralek, G. L. Dakovski, W. Hettel, M.-F. Lin, S. P. Moeller, W. F. Schlotter, A. H. Reid, M. P. Minitti, T. Boyle, F. He, R. Sutarto, R. Liang, D. Bonn, W. Har...

    2022

  7. [15]

    L. J. P. Ament, M. van Veenendaal, T. P. Devereaux, J. P. Hill, and J. van den Brink, Resonant inelas- tic x-ray scattering studies of elementary excitations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 705 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Mitrano, S

    M. Mitrano, S. Johnston, Y.-J. Kim, and M. P. M. Dean, Exploring quantum materials with resonant inelastic x- ray scattering, Phys. Rev. X 14, 040501 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    D. Jost, E. G. Lomeli, T. Tang, J. J. Kas, J. J. Rehr, W.-S. Lee, H.-C. Jiang, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Time-Resolved X-Ray Spectroscopy from the Atomic Or- bital Ground State Up, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011012 (2025) . 10

    2025

  10. [18]

    Mitrano and Y

    M. Mitrano and Y. Wang, Probing light-driven quantum materials with ultrafast resonant inelastic x-ray scatter - ing, Communications Physics 3, 184 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    M. P. M. Dean, Y. Cao, X. Liu, S. Wall, D. Zhu, R. Mankowsky, V. Thampy, X. M. Chen, J. G. Vale, D. Casa, J. Kim, A. H. Said, P. Juhas, R. Alonso-Mori, J. M. Glownia, A. Robert, J. Robinson, M. Sikorski, S. Song, M. Kozina, H. Lemke, L. Patthey, S. Owada, T. Katayama, M. Yabas...

    2016

  12. [20]

    D. G. Mazzone, D. Meyers, Y. Cao, J. G. Vale, C. D. Dashwood, Y. Shi, A. J. A. James, N. J. Robin- son, J. Lin, V. Thampy, Y. Tanaka, A. S. Johnson, H. Miao, R. Wang, T. A. Assefa, J. Kim, D. Casa, R. Mankowsky, D. Zhu, R. Alonso-Mori, S. Song, H. Yavas, T. Katayama, M. Yabash...

    2021

  13. [21]

    H. Lu, A. Gauthier, M. Hepting, A. S. Tremsin, A. H. Reid, P. S. Kirchmann, Z. X. Shen, T. P. De- vereaux, Y. C. Shao, X. Feng, G. Coslovich, Z. Hus- sain, G. L. Dakovski, Y. D. Chuang, and W. S. Lee, Time-resolved rixs experiment with pulse-by-pulse paral- lel readout data co...

    2020

  14. [22]

    Paris, C

    E. Paris, C. W. Nicholson, S. Johnston, Y. Tseng, M. Rumo, G. Coslovich, S. Zohar, M. F. Lin, V. N. Strocov, R. Saint-Martin, A. Revcolevschi, A. Kemper, W. Schlotter, G. L. Dakovski, C. Mon- ney, and T. Schmitt, Probing the interplay be- tween lattice dynamics and short-range...

    2021

  15. [23]

    E. M. Motoyama, G. Yu, I. M. Vishik, O. P. Vajk, P. K. Mang, and M. Greven, Spin correlations in the electron-doped high-transition-temperature super- conductor Nd 2−xCexCuO4+δ, Nature 445, 186 (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    N. P. Armitage, P. Fournier, and R. L. Greene, Progress and perspectives on electron-doped cuprates, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2421 (2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    K.-J. Xu, J. He, S.-D. Chen, Y. He, S. N. Abadi, C. R. Rotundu, Y. S. Lee, D.-H. Lu, Q. Guo, O. Tjern- berg, T. P. Devereaux, D.-H. Lee, M. Hashimoto, and Z.-X. Shen, Anomalous normal-state gap in an electron-doped cuprate, Science 385, 796 (2024) , https://www.science.org/doi...

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    W. S. Lee, J. J. Lee, E. A. Nowadnick, S. Ger- ber, W. Tabis, S. W. Huang, V. N. Strocov, E. M. Motoyama, G. Yu, B. Moritz, H. Y. Huang, R. P. Wang, Y. B. Huang, W. B. Wu, C. T. Chen, D. J. Huang, M. Greven, T. Schmitt, Z. X. Shen, and T. P. Devereaux, Asymmetry of collective ...

    2014

  19. [27]

    Ishii, M

    K. Ishii, M. Fujita, T. Sasaki, M. Minola, G. Dellea, C. Mazzoli, K. Kummer, G. Ghiringhelli, L. Braicovich, T. Tohyama, K. Tsutsumi, K. Sato, R. Kajimoto, K. Ikeuchi, K. Yamada, M. Yoshida, M. Kurooka, and J. Mizuki, High-energy spin and charge excita- tions in electron-doped...

    2014

  20. [28]

    Hepting, L

    M. Hepting, L. Chaix, E. W. Huang, R. Fumagalli, Y. Y. Peng, B. Moritz, K. Kummer, N. B. Brookes, W. C. Lee, M. Hashimoto, T. Sarkar, J.-F. He, C. R. Rotundu, Y. S. Lee, R. L. Greene, L. Braicovich, G. Ghiringhelli, Z. X. Shen, T. P. Devereaux, and W. S. Lee, Three-dimensional...

    2018

  21. [29]

    A. S. Moskvin, True charge-transfer gap in parent insu- lating cuprates, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075116 (2011)

    2011

  22. [30]

    J. H. Mentink, K. Balzer, and M. Eckstein, Ultrafast and reversible control of the exchange interaction in mott in- sulators, Nature Communications 6 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Y. Wang, Y. Chen, T. P. Devereaux, B. Moritz, and M. Mitrano, X-ray scattering from light-driven spin fluc- tuations in a doped mott insulator, Communications Physics 4 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Tsutsui, K

    K. Tsutsui, K. Shinjo, and T. Tohyama, An- tiphase oscillations in the time-resolved spin structure factor of a photoexcited mott insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127404 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Boschini, M

    F. Boschini, M. Zonno, E. Razzoli, R. P. Day, M. Michiardi, B. Zwartsenberg, P. Nigge, M. Schnei- der, E. H. da Silva Neto, A. Erb, S. Zhdanovich, A. K. Mills, G. Levy, C. Giannetti, D. J. Jones, and A. Damascelli, Emergence of pseudogap from short-range spin-correlations in e...

    2020

  26. [34]

    Padma, F

    H. Padma, F. Glerean, S. F. R. TenHuisen, Z. Shen, H. Wang, L. Xu, J. D. Elliott, C. C. Homes, E. Skoropata, H. Ueda, B. Liu, E. Paris, A. Romaguera, B. Lee, W. He, Y. Wang, S. H. Lee, H. Choi, S.-Y. Park, Z. Mao, M. Ca- landra, H. Jang, E. Razzoli, M. P. M. Dean, Y. Wang, and...

    2025 doi

  27. [35]

    Merzoni, L

    G. Merzoni, L. Martinelli, S. Parchenko, S. F. R. Ten- Huisen, V. Lebedev, L. Adriano, R. Carley, N. Gerasi- mova, L. Mercadier, M. Teichmann, B. E. van Kuiken, Z. Yin, A. Alic, D. R. Baykusheva, S. G. Chiuzbaian, S. D. Conte, O. Dogadov, A. F¨ ohlisch, M. W. Haverkort, M. Kus...

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    D. Jost, E. G. Lomeli, T. Tang, J. J. Kas, J. J. Rehr, W.-S. Lee, H.-C. Jiang, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Time-resolved x-ray spectroscopy from the atomic orbital g round state (2024), arXiv:2405.16025 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    D. R. Baykusheva, H. Jang, A. A. Husain, S. Lee, S. F. TenHuisen, P. Zhou, S. Park, H. Kim, J.-K. Kim, H.- D. Kim, et al. , Ultrafast renormalization of the on-site coulomb repulsion in a cuprate superconductor, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011013 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nature Physics 11, 453 (2015)

    2015

  31. [39]

    J. S. et al. , The heisenberg-rixs instrument at the euro- 11 pean xfel, J. Syn. Rad 32, 29 (2011)

    2011

  32. [40]

    C. Jia, K. Wohlfeld, Y. Wang, B. Moritz, and T. P. Dev- ereaux, Using rixs to uncover elementary charge and spin excitations, Phy. Rev. X 6, 021020 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    R. B. Lehoucq, D. C. Sorensen, and C. Yang, ARPACK Users’ Guide: Solution of Large-scale Eigenvalue Prob- lems with Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Methods (SIAM, 1998)

    1998

  34. [42]

    C. Jia, Y. Wang, C. Mendl, B. Moritz, and T. Devereaux, Paradeisos: a perfect hashing algorithm for many-body eigenvalue problems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 81 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    S. R. Manmana, S. Wessel, R. M. Noack, and A. Mu- ramatsu, Strongly correlated fermions after a quantum quench, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 210405 (2007)

    2007

  36. [44]

    Tsutsui, H

    K. Tsutsui, H. Kondo, T. Tohyama, and S. Maekawa, Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering Spectrum in High-Tc Cuprates, Physica B: Condensed Matter 284, 457 (2000)

    2000

  37. [45]

    Kourtis, J

    S. Kourtis, J. van den Brink, and M. Daghofer, Exact diagonalization results for resonant inelastic x-ray scat - tering spectra of one-dimensional mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B 85, 064423 (2012)

    2012

  38. [46]

    L. J. Ament, G. Ghiringhelli, M. M. Sala, L. Braicovich, and J. van den Brink, Theoretical demonstration of how the dispersion of magnetic excitations in cuprate com- pounds can be determined using resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 117003 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Braicovich, J

    L. Braicovich, J. van den Brink, V. Bisogni, M. M. Sala, L. J. P. Ament, N. B. Brookes, G. M. De Luca, M. Sal- luzzo, T. Schmitt, V. N. Strocov, and G. Ghiringhelli, Magnetic Excitations and Phase Separation in the Un- derdoped La 2−xSrxCuO4 Superconductor Measured by Resonant...

    2010

  40. [48]

    M. W. Haverkort, Theory of resonant inelastic x-ray scattering by collective magnetic excitations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 167404 (2010)

    2010

  41. [49]

    H. C. Robarts, M. Garc ´ ıa-Fern´ andez, J. Li, A. Nag, A. C. Walters, N. E. Headings, S. M. Hayden, and K.-J. Zhou, Dynamical Spin Susceptibility in La 2CuO4 Studied by Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering, Phys. Rev. B 103, 224427 (2021). 1 a c b 125o kin kout q +q // π− pol....

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.