pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.00983 · v2 · submitted 2025-11-30 · ⚛️ physics.space-ph · astro-ph.SR

A robust empirical relationship between speed and turbulence energy in the near-Earth solar wind

Rohit Chhiber , Yanwen Wang , Manuel E. Cuesta , Jiaming Wang , Sohom Roy This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 03:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.space-ph astro-ph.SR
keywords solar windturbulenceempirical lawbulk speedACEMHD fluctuationsspace physics
0
0 comments X

The pith

A robust empirical law connects solar wind speed to turbulence energy in near-Earth plasma.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes twenty-five years of observations from the Advanced Composition Explorer to derive an empirical relationship between the solar wind bulk-flow speed and the energy of magnetohydrodynamic-scale fluctuations. This relationship offers a straightforward way to estimate turbulence energy when only speed data is available at low resolution. A reader might care because it supports applications in space weather forecasting, remote imaging, and energetic particle transport without requiring advanced turbulence models or high-resolution measurements.

Core claim

Based on twenty-five years of near-Earth observations by NASA's Advanced Composition Explorer, the authors establish a robust empirical law relating the bulk-flow speed to the magnetohydrodynamic-scale fluctuation energy in the solar wind plasma. This provides a simple estimation method for turbulence energy from speed data alone.

What carries the argument

Empirical relationship linking bulk-flow speed to magnetohydrodynamic-scale fluctuation energy

If this is right

  • Estimates of turbulence energy can be made using only low-resolution speed measurements.
  • This approach supports space-weather forecasting operations.
  • Remote imaging datasets benefit from added turbulence information.
  • Energetic-particle transport models receive necessary turbulence amplitude values.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The relationship may apply to other parts of the heliosphere beyond near-Earth.
  • It could reduce reliance on complex turbulence simulations in large-scale models.
  • Future observations from other missions could confirm or refine the law.

Load-bearing premise

The relationship observed in near-Earth ACE data remains consistent across varying heliospheric regions, solar conditions, and different measurement datasets.

What would settle it

High-resolution turbulence measurements from spacecraft at varying distances from the Sun or during different solar wind regimes that deviate significantly from the energy predicted by the speed-based formula.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.00983 by Jiaming Wang, Manuel E. Cuesta, Rohit Chhiber, Sohom Roy, Yanwen Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Probability density functions (PDFs) of log of turbulence energy (log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Joint histograms of mean speed V and (a) total turbulence energy Z 2 , (b) magnetic turbulence energy b 2 A ≡ b 2 , and (c) Alfv´en ratio rA. Colorbars show interval abundance. Panels (a) and (b) show three empirical fits each of Z 2 and b 2 A to V , respectively. Fit parameters are stated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Evaluation of model performance over a 25-year period. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Scatterplot of percent error between modeled and observed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The connection between turbulence and solar-wind acceleration, long known in space physics, is further developed in this Letter by establishing a robust empirical law that relates the bulk-flow speed to the magnetohydrodynamic-scale fluctuation energy in the plasma. The model is based on analysis of twenty-five years of near-Earth observations by NASA's Advanced Composition Explorer. It provides a simple way to estimate turbulence energy from low-resolution speed data -- a practical approach that may be of utility when high-resolution measurements or advanced turbulence models are unavailable. Potential heliospheric applications include space-weather forecasting operations, remote imaging datasets, and energetic-particle transport models that require turbulence amplitudes to specify diffusion parameters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript establishes a robust empirical relationship between bulk-flow speed and MHD-scale fluctuation (turbulence) energy in the near-Earth solar wind, derived from twenty-five years of ACE spacecraft observations at 1 AU. It positions this as a practical tool for estimating turbulence amplitudes from low-resolution speed data, with suggested uses in space-weather forecasting, remote imaging, and energetic-particle transport models.

Significance. If the reported relationship holds under broader conditions, the work supplies a simple, observationally grounded method to infer turbulence levels where high-resolution plasma data or full turbulence models are unavailable. The multi-decade ACE baseline provides a substantial empirical foundation that could support practical applications in heliospheric modeling.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the characterization of the relationship as 'robust' and directly applicable to the listed heliospheric applications is not supported by any reported tests for dependence on solar-wind regime (fast vs. slow streams), solar-cycle phase, or radial distance; without such stratification or cross-validation the single fit cannot be used generically as claimed.
  2. [Results] The central empirical result rests exclusively on near-Earth ACE measurements; the manuscript provides no explicit validation against independent datasets (e.g., Wind, Ulysses, or Parker Solar Probe) or stationarity checks across the 25-year interval, which is load-bearing for the asserted utility in forecasting and transport models.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would be strengthened by stating the functional form of the fit (power-law or linear), the reported correlation coefficient or scatter, and the precise definition of 'turbulence energy' used in the analysis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below, indicating the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation of our empirical results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the characterization of the relationship as 'robust' and directly applicable to the listed heliospheric applications is not supported by any reported tests for dependence on solar-wind regime (fast vs. slow streams), solar-cycle phase, or radial distance; without such stratification or cross-validation the single fit cannot be used generically as claimed.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from greater qualification regarding the conditions under which the fit was derived. The 25-year ACE record inherently samples a wide range of flow speeds and solar-cycle phases, but we did not explicitly demonstrate invariance of the fit parameters under stratification. In revision we will add a dedicated subsection presenting the relationship separately for fast and slow wind intervals and for different portions of the solar cycle. We will also revise the abstract to state that the relation applies specifically to near-Earth conditions at 1 AU and to note that radial dependence lies outside the scope of the present study. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] The central empirical result rests exclusively on near-Earth ACE measurements; the manuscript provides no explicit validation against independent datasets (e.g., Wind, Ulysses, or Parker Solar Probe) or stationarity checks across the 25-year interval, which is load-bearing for the asserted utility in forecasting and transport models.

    Authors: The manuscript focuses on the long, homogeneous ACE time series at 1 AU. We will add an explicit stationarity test by splitting the 25-year interval into sub-periods aligned with solar minimum and maximum conditions and reporting the stability of the fitted coefficients. We will also include a direct comparison with near-Earth Wind data to provide independent validation at the same radial distance. Validation against Ulysses and Parker Solar Probe data would require radial scaling that is not part of the current analysis; we will therefore discuss the restriction to 1 AU as a limitation and outline how radial-evolution models could be combined with the present relation in future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Empirical fit to external ACE data is self-contained with no circular steps

full rationale

The paper establishes its central result as a direct empirical relationship fitted to twenty-five years of near-Earth ACE spacecraft observations. No load-bearing steps reduce by the paper's own equations or self-citations to the inputs; the relationship is presented as an observational pattern extracted from independent external data rather than derived from internal definitions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim is an empirical relationship derived from spacecraft observations. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are explicitly introduced or described in the abstract. The relationship is presented as data-driven without reference to new theoretical constructs or additional assumptions beyond the dataset itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5418 in / 1183 out tokens · 49937 ms · 2026-05-17T03:02:58.848716+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. N. Arge and V. J. Pizzo . Improvement in the prediction of solar wind conditions using near-real time solar magnetic field updates . , 105 0 (A5): 0 10465--10480, May 2000. doi:10.1029/1999JA000262

    work page doi:10.1029/1999ja000262 2000

  2. [2]

    Tracking the Multiscale Solar Wind Evolution with PUNCH Flow Maps

    Raphael Attie , Valmir Moraes Filho , Barbara Thompson , Vadim Uritsky , Nicholeen Viall , Craig DeForest , Heather Elliott , Maher Dayeh , and Chadi Salem . Tracking the Multiscale Solar Wind Evolution with PUNCH Flow Maps . In 246th Meeting of the American Astronomical Society, volume 246 of American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, page 126.05, ...

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    D. N. Baker , P. J. Erickson , J. F. Fennell , J. C. Foster , A. N. Jaynes , and P. T. Verronen . Space Weather Effects in the Earth's Radiation Belts . , 214 0 (1): 0 17, February 2018. doi:10.1007/s11214-017-0452-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-017-0452-7 2018

  4. [4]

    Riddhi Bandyopadhyay , M. L. Goldstein , B. A. Maruca , W. H. Matthaeus , T. N. Parashar , D. Ruffolo , R. Chhiber , A. Usmanov , A. Chasapis , R. Qudsi , Stuart D. Bale , J. W. Bonnell , Thierry Dudok de Wit , Keith Goetz , Peter R. Harvey , Robert J. MacDowall , David M. Malaspina , Marc Pulupa , J. C. Kasper , K. E. Korreck , A. W. Case , M. Stevens , ...

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab5dae 2020

  5. [5]

    J. W. Belcher and L. Davis , Jr. Large-amplitude Alfv \'e n waves in the interplanetary medium, 2 . , 76: 0 3534, 1971. doi:10.1029/JA076i016p03534

    work page doi:10.1029/ja076i016p03534 1971

  6. [6]

    Borovsky and Herbert O

    Joseph E. Borovsky and Herbert O. Funsten . Role of solar wind turbulence in the coupling of the solar wind to the Earth's magnetosphere . Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 108 0 (A6): 0 1246, June 2003. doi:10.1029/2002JA009601

    work page doi:10.1029/2002ja009601 2003

  7. [7]

    Space weather: physics and effects

    Volker Bothmer and Ioannis A Daglis. Space weather: physics and effects. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Bruno and V

    R. Bruno and V. Carbone . The Solar Wind as a Turbulence Laboratory . Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 10: 0 2, December 2013. doi:10.12942/lrsp-2013-2

    work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2013-2 2013

  9. [9]

    L. F. Burlaga and A. J. Lazarus . Lognormal distributions and spectra of solar wind plasma fluctuations: Wind 1995-1998 . , 105 0 (A2): 0 2357--2364, February 2000. doi:10.1029/1999JA900442

    work page doi:10.1029/1999ja900442 1995

  10. [10]

    Chhiber , P

    R. Chhiber , P. Subedi , A. V. Usmanov , W. H. Matthaeus , D. Ruffolo , M. L. Goldstein , and T. N. Parashar . Cosmic-Ray Diffusion Coefficients throughout the Inner Heliosphere from a Global Solar Wind Simulation . , 230: 0 21, June 2017. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa74d2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa74d2 2017

  11. [11]

    Matthaeus , Arcadi V

    Rohit Chhiber , David Ruffolo , William H. Matthaeus , Arcadi V. Usmanov , Paisan Tooprakai , Piyanate Chuychai , and Melvyn L. Goldstein . Random Walk and Trapping of Interplanetary Magnetic Field Lines: Global Simulation, Magnetic Connectivity, and Implications for Solar Energetic Particles . , 908 0 (2): 0 174, February 2021 a . doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd7f0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abd7f0 2021

  12. [12]

    Usmanov , William H

    Rohit Chhiber , Arcadi V. Usmanov , William H. Matthaeus , and Melvyn L. Goldstein . Large-scale Structure and Turbulence Transport in the Inner Solar Wind: Comparison of Parker Solar Probe's First Five Orbits with a Global 3D Reynolds-averaged MHD Model . , 923 0 (1): 0 89, December 2021 b . doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1ac7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1ac7 2021

  13. [13]

    Matthaeus , Sohom Roy , and Barbara J

    Rohit Chhiber , Raphael Attie , William H. Matthaeus , Sohom Roy , and Barbara J. Thompson . von K \'a rm \'a n-Howarth Similarity of Spatial Correlations and the Distribution of Correlation Lengths in Solar Photospheric Turbulence . , October 2025. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1863

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1863 2025

  14. [14]

    Clette and L

    F. Clette and L. Lefèvre . Silso sunspot number v2.0. https://doi.org/10.24414/qnza-ac80, 07 2015. Published by WDC SILSO - Royal Observatory of Belgium (ROB)

    work page doi:10.24414/qnza-ac80 2015

  15. [15]

    Steven R. Cranmer . Coronal Holes . Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 6 0 (1): 0 3, December 2009. doi:10.12942/lrsp-2009-3

    work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2009-3 2009

  16. [16]

    Cranmer and Amy R

    Steven R. Cranmer and Amy R. Winebarger . The Properties of the Solar Corona and Its Connection to the Solar Wind . , 57: 0 157--187, August 2019. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104416

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104416 2019

  17. [17]

    D'Amicis , R

    R. D'Amicis , R. Bruno , and B. Bavassano . Is geomagnetic activity driven by solar wind turbulence? , 34 0 (5): 0 L05108, March 2007. doi:10.1029/2006GL028896

    work page doi:10.1029/2006gl028896 2007

  18. [18]

    De Pontieu , S

    B. De Pontieu , S. W. McIntosh , M. Carlsson , V. H. Hansteen , T. D. Tarbell , C. J. Schrijver , A. M. Title , R. A. Shine , S. Tsuneta , Y. Katsukawa , K. Ichimoto , Y. Suematsu , T. Shimizu , and S. Nagata . Chromospheric Alfv \'e nic Waves Strong Enough to Power the Solar Wind . Science, 318 0 (5856): 0 1574, December 2007. doi:10.1126/science.1151747

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1151747 2007

  19. [19]

    Polarimeter to Unify the Corona and Heliosphere (PUNCH)

    Craig DeForest , Sarah Gibson , Ronnie Killough , Nick Waltham , Matt Beasley , Robin Colaninno , Glenn Laurent , Daniel Seaton , Marcus Hughes , Madhulika Guhathakurta , Nicholeen Viall , Raphael Attie , Dipankar Banerjee , Luke Barnar , Doug Biesecker , Mario Bisi , Volker Bothmer , Antonina Brody , Joan Burkepile , Iver Cairns , Jennifer Campbell , dav...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.15131 2025

  20. [20]

    H. A. Elliott , C. J. Henney , D. J. McComas , C. W. Smith , and B. J. Vasquez . Temporal and radial variation of the solar wind temperature-speed relationship . Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 117 0 (A9): 0 A09102, September 2012. doi:10.1029/2011JA017125

    work page doi:10.1029/2011ja017125 2012

  21. [21]

    H. A. Elliott , D. J. McComas , P. Valek , G. Nicolaou , S. Weidner , and G. Livadiotis . The New Horizons Solar Wind Around Pluto (SWAP) Observations of the Solar Wind from 11-33 au . , 223 0 (2): 0 19, April 2016. doi:10.3847/0067-0049/223/2/19

    work page doi:10.3847/0067-0049/223/2/19 2016

  22. [22]

    Eugene Engelbrecht , F

    N. Eugene Engelbrecht , F. Effenberger , V. Florinski , M. S. Potgieter , D. Ruffolo , R. Chhiber , A. V. Usmanov , J. S. Rankin , and P. L. Els . Theory of Cosmic Ray Transport in the Heliosphere . , 218 0 (4): 0 33, June 2022. doi:10.1007/s11214-022-00896-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-022-00896-1 2022

  23. [23]

    In situ observations of magnetic field fluctuations

    G \'e za Erd o s and Andr \'e Balogh . In situ observations of magnetic field fluctuations . Advances in Space Research, 35 0 (4): 0 625--635, January 2005. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.048

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.048 2005

  24. [24]

    R. J. Forsyth , T. S. Horbury , A. Balogh , and E. J. Smith . Hourly variances of fluctuations in the heliospheric magnetic field out of the ecliptic plane . , 23 0 (5): 0 595--598, March 1996. doi:10.1029/96GL00416

    work page doi:10.1029/96gl00416 1996

  25. [25]

    T. I. Gombosi , B. van der Holst , W. B. Manchester , and I. V. Sokolov . Extended MHD modeling of the steady solar corona and the solar wind . Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 15: 0 4, July 2018. doi:10.1007/s41116-018-0014-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s41116-018-0014-4 2018

  26. [26]

    a , C. H. K. Chen , C. M \

    S. W. Good , O. K. Rantala , A.-S. M. Jylh \"a , C. H. K. Chen , C. M \"o stl , and E. K. J. Kilpua . Turbulence Properties of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections in the Inner Heliosphere: Dependence on Proton Beta and Flux Rope Structure . , 956 0 (1): 0 L30, October 2023. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acfd1c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acfd1c 2023

  27. [27]

    Guo and V

    X. Guo and V. Florinski . Galactic Cosmic-Ray Intensity Modulation by Corotating Interaction Region Stream Interfaces at 1 au . , 826: 0 65, July 2016. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/65

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/1/65 2016

  28. [28]

    Introduction to plasma physics: With space, laboratory and astrophysical applications

    Donald A Gurnett and Amitava Bhattacharjee. Introduction to plasma physics: With space, laboratory and astrophysical applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    T. S. Horbury and A. Balogh . Evolution of magnetic field fluctuations in high-speed solar wind streams: Ulysses and Helios observations . , 106 0 (A8): 0 15929--15940, August 2001. doi:10.1029/2000JA000108

    work page doi:10.1029/2000ja000108 2001

  30. [30]

    Airapetian , Gang Li , Gary Zank , and Meng Jin

    Junxiang Hu , Vladimir S. Airapetian , Gang Li , Gary Zank , and Meng Jin . Extreme energetic particle events by superflare-asssociated CMEs from solar-like stars . Science Advances, 8 0 (12): 0 eabi9743, March 2022. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abi9743

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abi9743 2022

  31. [31]

    K. H. Kiyani , K. T. Osman , and S. C. Chapman . Dissipation and heating in solar wind turbulence: from the macro to the micro and back again . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 373 0 (2041): 0 20140155--20140155, April 2015. doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0155

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0155 2041

  32. [32]

    J. A. Klimchuk . On Solving the Coronal Heating Problem . , 234: 0 41--77, March 2006. doi:10.1007/s11207-006-0055-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-006-0055-z 2006

  33. [33]

    Laitinen , A

    T. Laitinen , A. Kopp , F. Effenberger , S. Dalla , and M. S. Marsh . Solar energetic particle access to distant longitudes through turbulent field-line meandering . , 591: 0 A18, June 2016. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527801

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527801 2016

  34. [34]

    Leer , T

    E. Leer , T. E. Holzer , and T. Fla . Acceleration of the solar wind . , 33: 0 161--200, March 1982. doi:10.1007/BF00213253

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00213253 1982

  35. [35]

    Stahel, and Markus Abbt

    Eckhard Limpert, Werner A. Stahel, and Markus Abbt. Log-normal distributions across the sciences: Keys and clues: On the charms of statistics, and how mechanical models resembling gambling machines offer a link to a handy way to characterize log-normal distributions, which can provide deeper insight into variability and probability—normal or log-normal: T...

    work page doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051 2001

  36. [36]

    MacNeice , L

    P. MacNeice , L. K. Jian , S. K. Antiochos , C. N. Arge , C. D. Bussy-Virat , M. L. DeRosa , B. V. Jackson , J. A. Linker , Z. Mikic , M. J. Owens , A. J. Ridley , P. Riley , N. Savani , and I. Sokolov . Assessing the Quality of Models of the Ambient Solar Wind . Space Weather, 16 0 (11): 0 1644--1667, November 2018. doi:10.1029/2018SW002040

    work page doi:10.1029/2018sw002040 2018

  37. [37]

    W. H. Matthaeus and M. L. Goldstein . Measurement of the rugged invariants of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in the solar wind . , 87: 0 6011--6028, August 1982. doi:10.1029/JA087iA08p06011

    work page doi:10.1029/ja087ia08p06011 1982

  38. [38]

    W. H. Matthaeus and M. Velli . Who Needs Turbulence?. A Review of Turbulence Effects in the Heliosphere and on the Fundamental Process of Reconnection . , 160: 0 145--168, October 2011. doi:10.1007/s11214-011-9793-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-011-9793-9 2011

  39. [39]

    W. H. Matthaeus , M. L. Goldstein , and D. A. Roberts . Evidence for the presence of quasi-two-dimensional nearly incompressible fluctuations in the solar wind . , 95: 0 20673--20683, December 1990. doi:10.1029/JA095iA12p20673

    work page doi:10.1029/ja095ia12p20673 1990

  40. [40]

    W. H. Matthaeus , G. P. Zank , S. Oughton , D. J. Mullan , and P. Dmitruk . Coronal Heating by Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence Driven by Reflected Low-Frequency Waves . , 523: 0 L93--L96, September 1999. doi:10.1086/312259

    work page doi:10.1086/312259 1999

  41. [41]

    W. H. Matthaeus , H. A. Elliott , and D. J. McComas . Correlation of speed and temperature in the solar wind . Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), 111 0 (A10): 0 A10103, October 2006. doi:10.1029/2006JA011636

    work page doi:10.1029/2006ja011636 2006

  42. [42]

    Matthaeus , Yan Yang , Minping Wan , Tulasi N

    William H. Matthaeus , Yan Yang , Minping Wan , Tulasi N. Parashar , Riddhi Bandyopadhyay , Alexand ros Chasapis , Oreste Pezzi , and Francesco Valentini . Pathways to Dissipation in Weakly Collisional Plasmas . Astrophys. J., 891 0 (1): 0 101, March 2020. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6d6a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6d6a 2020

  43. [43]

    D. J. McComas , H. A. Elliott , N. A. Schwadron , J. T. Gosling , R. M. Skoug , and B. E. Goldstein . The three-dimensional solar wind around solar maximum . , 30: 0 1517, May 2003. doi:10.1029/2003GL017136

    work page doi:10.1029/2003gl017136 2003

  44. [44]

    Solar wind electron proton alpha monitor (swepam) for the advanced composition explorer

    DJ McComas, SJ Bame, P Barker, WC Feldman, JL Phillips, P Riley, and JW Griffee. Solar wind electron proton alpha monitor (swepam) for the advanced composition explorer. Space Science Reviews, 86 0 (1): 0 563--612, 1998

    work page 1998

  45. [45]

    Miesch , W

    M. Miesch , W. Matthaeus , A. Brandenburg , A. Petrosyan , A. Pouquet , C. Cambon , F. Jenko , D. Uzdensky , J. Stone , S. Tobias , J. Toomre , and M. Velli . Large-Eddy Simulations of Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence in Heliophysics and Astrophysics . , 194: 0 97--137, November 2015. doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0190-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0190-7 2015

  46. [46]

    V. N. Obridko and O. L. Vaisberg . On the history of the solar wind discovery . Solar System Research, 51: 0 165--169, March 2017. doi:10.1134/S0038094617020058

    work page doi:10.1134/s0038094617020058 2017

  47. [47]

    N. S. Padhye , C. W. Smith , and W. H. Matthaeus . Distribution of magnetic field components in the solar wind plasma . , 106 0 (A9): 0 18635--18650, September 2001. doi:10.1029/2000JA000293

    work page doi:10.1029/2000ja000293 2001

  48. [48]

    E. N. Parker . Dynamics of the Interplanetary Gas and Magnetic Fields. , 128: 0 664, November 1958. doi:10.1086/146579

    work page doi:10.1086/146579 1958

  49. [49]

    Wang-Sheeley-Arge-Enlil Cone Model Transitions to Operations

    Vic Pizzo , George Millward , Annette Parsons , Douglas Biesecker , Steve Hill , and Dusan Odstrcil . Wang-Sheeley-Arge-Enlil Cone Model Transitions to Operations . Space Weather, 9 0 (3): 0 03004, March 2011. doi:10.1029/2011SW000663

    work page doi:10.1029/2011sw000663 2011

  50. [50]

    S. B. Pope . Turbulent Flows . Cambridge University Press, August 2000

    work page 2000

  51. [51]

    Pradata , Sohom Roy , William H

    Rayta A. Pradata , Sohom Roy , William H. Matthaeus , Jiaming Wang , Rohit Chhiber , Francesco Pecora , and Yan Yang . Observations of 1/f Noise at Mercury's Solar Wind Using MESSENGER Data . , 984 0 (1): 0 L23, May 2025. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc9b2

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc9b2 2025

  52. [52]

    G., Vourlidas, A., et al

    Elena Provornikova , Viacheslav G. Merkin , Angelos Vourlidas , Anna Malanushenko , Sarah E. Gibson , Eric Winter , and Charles N. Arge . MHD Modeling of a Geoeffective Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection with the Magnetic Topology Informed by In Situ Observations . , 977 0 (1): 0 106, December 2024. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad83b1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad83b1 2024

  53. [53]

    Space Weather: Terrestrial Perspective

    Tuija Pulkkinen . Space Weather: Terrestrial Perspective . Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 4 0 (1): 0 1, December 2007. doi:10.12942/lrsp-2007-1

    work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2007-1 2007

  54. [54]

    I. G. Richardson and H. V. Cane . Near-Earth Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections During Solar Cycle 23 (1996 - 2009): Catalog and Summary of Properties . , 264 0 (1): 0 189--237, June 2010. doi:10.1007/s11207-010-9568-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-010-9568-6 1996

  55. [55]

    Near-Earth Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Since January 1996 , 2024

    Ian Richardson and Hilary Cane. Near-Earth Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Since January 1996 , 2024. URL https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/C2MHTH

    work page doi:10.7910/dvn/c2mhth 1996

  56. [56]

    Rivera , Samuel T

    Yeimy J. Rivera , Samuel T. Badman , Michael L. Stevens , Jaye L. Verniero , Julia E. Stawarz , Chen Shi , Jim M. Raines , Kristoff W. Paulson , Christopher J. Owen , Tatiana Niembro , Philippe Louarn , Stefano A. Livi , Susan T. Lepri , Justin C. Kasper , Timothy S. Horbury , Jasper S. Halekas , Ryan M. Dewey , Rossana De Marco , and Stuart D. Bale . In ...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adk6953 2024

  57. [57]

    Chhiber , S

    Sohom Roy , R. Chhiber , S. Dasso , M. E. Ruiz , and W. H. Matthaeus . von Karman Correlation Similarity of the Turbulent Interplanetary Magnetic Field . , 919 0 (2): 0 L27, October 2021. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac21d2

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac21d2 2021

  58. [58]

    Chhiber , S

    Sohom Roy , R. Chhiber , S. Dasso , M. E. Ruiz , and W. H. Matthaeus . von Karman correlation similarity in solar wind magnetohydrodynamic turbulence . , 105 0 (4): 0 045204, April 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.105.045204

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.105.045204 2022

  59. [59]

    M. E. Ruiz , S. Dasso , W. H. Matthaeus , and J. M. Weygand . Characterization of the Turbulent Magnetic Integral Length in the Solar Wind: From 0.3 to 5 Astronomical Units . Solar Physics, 289: 0 3917--3933, October 2014. doi:10.1007/s11207-014-0531-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s11207-014-0531-9 2014

  60. [60]

    Samara , C

    E. Samara , C. N. Arge , R. F. Pinto , J. Magdaleni \'c , N. Wijsen , M. L. Stevens , L. Rodriguez , and S. Poedts . Calibrating the WSA Model in EUHFORIA Based on Parker Solar Probe Observations . , 971 0 (1): 0 83, August 2024. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad53c6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad53c6 2024

  61. [61]

    Halekas , Anna Tenerani , Victor R \'e ville , Jean-Baptiste Dakeyo , Milan Maksimovi \'c , and Stuart D

    Chen Shi , Marco Velli , Roberto Lionello , Nikos Sioulas , Zesen Huang , Jasper S. Halekas , Anna Tenerani , Victor R \'e ville , Jean-Baptiste Dakeyo , Milan Maksimovi \'c , and Stuart D. Bale . Proton and Electron Temperatures in the Solar Wind and Their Correlations with the Solar Wind Speed . , 944 0 (1): 0 82, February 2023. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb341

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb341 2023

  62. [62]

    Shiota , G

    D. Shiota , G. P. Zank , L. Adhikari , P. Hunana , D. Telloni , and R. Bruno . Turbulent Transport in a Three-dimensional Solar Wind . , 837: 0 75, March 2017. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa60bc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa60bc 2017

  63. [63]

    McComas, and Heather A

    Ruth Skoug, Dave J. McComas, and Heather A. Elliott. Effect of ace spacecraft repointing on swepam calculated moments. Technical report, ACE Science Center, California Institute of Technology, 2014. URL https://izw1.caltech.edu/ACE/ASC/ACE_repointing.pdf. Technical analysis memo; discusses CEM aging (post-2010) and Oct 23, 2012 repointing improving valid moments

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    Extremely high speed solar wind: 29--30 october 2003

    Ruth M Skoug, JT Gosling, John T Steinberg, DJ McComas, CW Smith, NF Ness, Q Hu, and LF Burlaga. Extremely high speed solar wind: 29--30 october 2003. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 109 0 (A9), 2004

    work page 2003

  65. [65]

    The ace magnetic fields experiment

    Charles W Smith, Jacques L'Heureux, Norman F Ness, Mario H Acuna, Leonard F Burlaga, and John Scheifele. The ace magnetic fields experiment. Space Science Reviews, 86 0 (1): 0 613--632, 1998

    work page 1998

  66. [66]

    Sokolov , Bart van der Holst , Rona Oran , Cooper Downs , Ilia I

    Igor V. Sokolov , Bart van der Holst , Rona Oran , Cooper Downs , Ilia I. Roussev , Meng Jin , Ward B. Manchester , IV, Rebekah M. Evans , and Tamas I. Gombosi . Magnetohydrodynamic Waves and Coronal Heating: Unifying Empirical and MHD Turbulence Models . , 764 0 (1): 0 23, February 2013. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/23

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/764/1/23 2013

  67. [67]

    Vishal Upendran , Mark C. M. Cheung , Shravan Hanasoge , and Ganapathy Krishnamurthi . Solar Wind Prediction Using Deep Learning . Space Weather, 18 0 (9): 0 e02478, September 2020. doi:10.1029/2020SW002478

    work page doi:10.1029/2020sw002478 2020

  68. [68]

    A. V. Usmanov , M. L. Goldstein , B. P. Besser , and J. M. Fritzer . A global MHD solar wind model with WKB Alfv \'e n waves: Comparison with Ulysses data . , 105: 0 12675--12696, June 2000. doi:10.1029/1999JA000233

    work page doi:10.1029/1999ja000233 2000

  69. [69]

    Usmanov , Rohit Chhiber , William H

    Arcadi V. Usmanov , Rohit Chhiber , William H. Matthaeus , Sohom Roy , and Melvyn L. Goldstein . A Unified Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Model of the Solar Corona, Solar Wind, and Global Heliosphere with Turbulence Transport . , 993 0 (1): 0 87, November 2025. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae019c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae019c 2025

  70. [70]

    Ilya G. Usoskin . A history of solar activity over millennia . Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 20 0 (1): 0 2, December 2023. doi:10.1007/s41116-023-00036-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s41116-023-00036-z 2023

  71. [71]

    van der Holst , I

    B. van der Holst , I. V. Sokolov , X. Meng , M. Jin , W. B. Manchester , IV, G. T \'o th , and T. I. Gombosi . Alfv \'e n Wave Solar Model (AWSoM): Coronal Heating . , 782: 0 81, February 2014. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/81

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/782/2/81 2014

  72. [72]

    Klein , and Bennett A

    Daniel Verscharen , Kristopher G. Klein , and Bennett A. Maruca . The multi-scale nature of the solar wind . Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 16 0 (1): 0 5, December 2019. doi:10.1007/s41116-019-0021-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s41116-019-0021-0 2019

  73. [73]

    Cuesta , Francesco Pecora , Yan Yang , Xiangrong Fu , Hui Li , and William H

    Jiaming Wang , Rohit Chhiber , Sohom Roy , Manuel E. Cuesta , Francesco Pecora , Yan Yang , Xiangrong Fu , Hui Li , and William H. Matthaeus . Anisotropy of Density Fluctuations in the Solar Wind at 1 au . , 967 0 (2): 0 150, June 2024. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e7a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e7a 2024

  74. [74]

    Matthaeus

    Jiaming Wang , Francesco Pecora , Rohit Chhiber , Sohom Roy , and William H. Matthaeus . Interplanetary magnetic correlation and low-frequency spectrum over many solar rotations . arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2507.16053, July 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Wang and N

    Y.-M. Wang and N. R. Sheeley , Jr. Solar Wind Speed and Coronal Flux-Tube Expansion . , 355: 0 726, June 1990. doi:10.1086/168805

    work page doi:10.1086/168805 1990

  76. [76]

    Wang and N

    Y.-M. Wang and N. R. Sheeley , Jr. Why Fast Solar Wind Originates from Slowly Expanding Coronal Flux Tubes . , 372: 0 L45, May 1991. doi:10.1086/186020

    work page doi:10.1086/186020 1991

  77. [77]

    Webb and Timothy A

    David F. Webb and Timothy A. Howard . Coronal Mass Ejections: Observations . Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 9 0 (1): 0 3, December 2012. doi:10.12942/lrsp-2012-3

    work page doi:10.12942/lrsp-2012-3 2012

  78. [78]

    Richardson , Clayton Allison , Philip Quinn , Janet Barzilla , Irina Kitiashvili , Viacheslav Sadykov , Hazel M

    Kathryn Whitman , Ricky Egeland , Ian G. Richardson , Clayton Allison , Philip Quinn , Janet Barzilla , Irina Kitiashvili , Viacheslav Sadykov , Hazel M. Bain , Mark Dierckxsens , M. Leila Mays , Tilaye Tadesse , Kerry T. Lee , Edward Semones , Janet G. Luhmann , Marlon N \'u \ n ez , Stephen M. White , Stephen W. Kahler , Alan G. Ling , Don F. Smart , Ma...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2022.08.006 2023

  79. [79]

    Parashar

    Daniel Wrench and Tulasi N. Parashar . Debiasing Structure Function Estimates from Sparse Time Series of the Solar Wind: A Data-driven Approach . , 987 0 (1): 0 28, July 2025. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/addc6a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/addc6a 2025

  80. [80]

    Consistency of von Karman Decay Rate with the Energy Supply Rate and Heating Rate Observed by Parker Solar Probe

    Honghong Wu , Chuanyi Tu , Jiansen He , Xin Wang , and Liping Yang . Consistency of von Karman Decay Rate with the Energy Supply Rate and Heating Rate Observed by Parker Solar Probe . , 926 0 (2): 0 116, February 2022. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4413

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4413 2022

Showing first 80 references.