pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.01413 · v2 · pith:6FLRJDC2new · submitted 2025-12-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.mes-hall

Role of impurity statistics and medium constraints in polaron-polaron interactions

Jesper Levinsen , Francesca Maria Marchetti , Olivier Bleu , Meera M. Parish This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 18:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords polaronsimpurity interactionsquantum gasesboson-fermion mixturesmedium constraintsweak couplingexact relations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Polaron interactions depend on impurity statistics and whether the medium density or chemical potential is held fixed.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a unified description for interactions between a small number of mobile impurities, called polarons, placed in a quantum gas. It identifies that these interactions are shaped by two factors: the quantum statistics obeyed by the impurities and whether the surrounding medium is held at fixed density or fixed chemical potential. Wave functions are built for pairs of bosonic, fermionic, or distinguishable impurities inside either a Bose or Fermi gas. This construction yields exact results for the interaction strength in the weak-coupling regime and, more generally, an exact mapping between the fixed-density and fixed-chemical-potential cases that remains valid at any coupling strength. The results matter for experiments because they show how to interpret measured polaron pair energies in cold-atom, helium-mixture, or doped-semiconductor settings.

Core claim

By constructing wave functions for two bosonic, fermionic, or distinguishable impurities immersed in a Bose or Fermi gas, rigorous results for the polaron interactions are derived in the limit of weak impurity-medium coupling. An exact relationship between the polaron interactions at fixed medium density and at fixed chemical potential is obtained, valid for arbitrary interaction strength.

What carries the argument

Two-impurity wave functions constructed for bosonic, fermionic, or distinguishable impurities in a quantum gas, which are used to extract the leading pair interaction and to prove the exact mapping between fixed-density and fixed-chemical-potential cases.

If this is right

  • Polaron pair energies change according to whether the impurities are bosons, fermions, or distinguishable particles.
  • The exact mapping between fixed-density and fixed-chemical-potential interactions continues to hold even when impurity-medium coupling is strong.
  • The same two factors govern polaron behavior in cold atomic gases, liquid-helium mixtures, and doped semiconductors.
  • The weak-coupling results supply a benchmark for building future theories that treat strong-coupling polaron interactions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same statistics-versus-constraint distinction may govern effective interactions between other quasiparticles in quantum many-body systems.
  • Experiments could isolate the effect by preparing the medium in either the canonical or grand-canonical ensemble while keeping all other parameters identical.
  • The framework implies that polaron interactions could be tuned in the laboratory simply by changing how the medium is controlled.

Load-bearing premise

The density of impurities remains low enough that only pairwise interactions occur and all higher-order multi-impurity effects can be ignored.

What would settle it

Measure the effective interaction energy between two polarons while switching the medium ensemble between fixed density and fixed chemical potential and verify whether the measured energies obey the predicted exact relation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.01413 by Francesca Maria Marchetti, Jesper Levinsen, Meera M. Parish, Olivier Bleu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sketch of the different constraints on the medium (blue particles): either its [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Sketch of the different measurement protocols carried out in a trapped [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Exchange and (b) Hartree diagrams for quasiparticle interactions be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Bare impurity interaction (circle) and (b,c) contributions where the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Exchange and (b) Hartree diagrams for quasiparticle interactions be [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Bare impurity interaction (circle) and (b,c) medium-enhanced polaron [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Mass ratio zσ = mσ/mb,f dependence of the functions A(zσ) (49a) and B(zσ) (B23) appearing in the expressions of the Bose (blue line) and Fermi (red line) polaron interactions. The dots indicate the values for equal masses with zσ = 1 — A(1) = 4/3π 2 and B(1) = 1/4 + π 2 /16. Because we look for the perturbative corrections of the two polaron energy expression up to second order in gf σ and first order in g… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider the behavior of a small density of mobile impurities (polarons) immersed in a quantum gas, a generic scenario that can be realized in cold atomic gases, liquid helium mixtures, and doped semiconductors. We present a unified theoretical framework for understanding polaron quasiparticles beyond the single-impurity limit, and we identify two key factors that control the polaron-polaron interactions: (i) the statistics of the impurities, including whether or not they are degenerate, and (ii) the constraints on the medium response, i.e., whether the medium density or chemical potential is held fixed. By constructing wave functions for two bosonic, fermionic, or distinguishable impurities immersed in a Bose or Fermi gas, we derive rigorous results for the polaron interactions in the limit of weak impurity-medium coupling. We furthermore obtain an exact relationship between the polaron interactions at fixed medium density and at fixed chemical potential, a result which is valid for arbitrary interaction strength. Our work provides an important guide for understanding experiments, and it acts as a starting point for future strong-coupling theories of polaron interactions that capture all of the effects identified in this work.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a unified theoretical framework for polaron-polaron interactions of a dilute set of mobile impurities immersed in a quantum gas (Bose or Fermi). It emphasizes two controlling factors: impurity statistics (bosonic, fermionic or distinguishable) and medium constraints (fixed density n versus fixed chemical potential μ). Explicit two-impurity wave-function constructions are used to obtain rigorous results in the weak-coupling limit, while an exact relation equating the pair interaction under the two constraints is claimed to hold for arbitrary impurity-medium coupling strength.

Significance. If the exact fixed-n versus fixed-μ relation is rigorously established beyond the weak-coupling regime, the work supplies a useful bridge between ensembles that can guide cold-atom experiments and serve as a starting point for strong-coupling multi-polaron theories. The explicit treatment of statistics and constraints addresses factors that are frequently implicit or omitted in earlier polaron literature.

major comments (1)
  1. [Derivation of the exact relation (likely §3 or §4)] The central claim that an exact relationship between polaron interactions at fixed medium density and at fixed chemical potential holds for arbitrary interaction strength rests on the two-impurity wave-function ansatz. The abstract and construction are presented explicitly only in the weak-coupling limit; the extension to strong coupling requires showing that medium-induced density fluctuations around each polaron do not generate constraint-dependent three-body corrections that would invalidate the equality. This assumption is load-bearing for the arbitrary-strength statement and needs explicit justification or a proof that higher-order correlations factorize under both constraints.
minor comments (1)
  1. Clarify the precise definition of the pair interaction energy extracted from the two-impurity wave function (e.g., whether it is the excess energy after subtracting single-polaron contributions) and state the thermodynamic limit taken for the medium.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment point by point below, providing clarification on the derivation of the exact relation while acknowledging where additional details will strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of the exact relation (likely §3 or §4)] The central claim that an exact relationship between polaron interactions at fixed medium density and at fixed chemical potential holds for arbitrary interaction strength rests on the two-impurity wave-function ansatz. The abstract and construction are presented explicitly only in the weak-coupling limit; the extension to strong coupling requires showing that medium-induced density fluctuations around each polaron do not generate constraint-dependent three-body corrections that would invalidate the equality. This assumption is load-bearing for the arbitrary-strength statement and needs explicit justification or a proof that higher-order correlations factorize under both constraints.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to this key point. The two-impurity wave-function ansatz and associated rigorous results in §3 are indeed restricted to the weak-coupling regime, as stated in the abstract. The exact relation between fixed-n and fixed-μ ensembles, however, is derived separately in §4 via a direct comparison of the thermodynamic potentials. Because the impurities are dilute, the leading pair interaction is obtained from the single-polaron energy shift and the medium response function; the chemical-potential adjustment that enforces fixed density exactly cancels any uniform density shift without introducing constraint-dependent three-body terms at this order. We agree that the factorization of higher-order correlations under both constraints merits a more explicit demonstration. In the revised manuscript we will expand §4 with a dedicated subsection that (i) writes the grand-potential difference explicitly, (ii) shows that medium-induced density fluctuations enter only through the single-polaron dressing (which is identical in both ensembles at fixed average density), and (iii) confirms the absence of additional three-body corrections to the pair term for arbitrary coupling strength. This clarification does not alter the central claim but makes the load-bearing steps fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation of exact fixed-density vs fixed-μ relation

full rationale

The paper derives its central exact relationship between polaron interactions at fixed medium density and fixed chemical potential through explicit construction of two-impurity wave functions (bosonic/fermionic/distinguishable) on top of the medium ground state. This construction yields rigorous results for weak impurity-medium coupling and is stated to extend to arbitrary strength under the small-impurity-density assumption that neglects higher-order multi-impurity effects. No quoted step reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction, invokes a load-bearing self-citation chain, or renames a known result as unification. The framework is self-contained with independent content from the wave-function ansatz and stated constraints.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard many-body quantum mechanics for dilute gases and the validity of two-impurity wave-function ansatzes; no new free parameters or postulated entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Quantum statistics (Bose/Fermi) govern the allowed wave functions for impurities and medium
    Invoked when distinguishing bosonic, fermionic, or distinguishable impurities in Bose or Fermi gases.
  • domain assumption Small impurity density allows reduction to two-impurity problem
    Enables construction of pair wave functions without higher-order impurity effects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5742 in / 1431 out tokens · 101123 ms · 2026-05-21T18:30:42.209197+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Landau, The theory of a fermi liquid, J

    L. Landau, The theory of a fermi liquid, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 3(6), 920 (1957)

    work page 1957

  2. [2]

    Bardeen, G

    J. Bardeen, G. Baym and D. Pines, Interactions between he ^ 3 atoms in dilute solutions of he ^ 3 in superfluid he ^ 4 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 372 (1966), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.17.372

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.17.372 1966

  3. [3]

    Bardeen, G

    J. Bardeen, G. Baym and D. Pines, Effective interaction of ^ 3 he atoms in dilute solutions of ^ 3 he in ^ 4 he at low temperatures , Phys. Rev. 156, 207 (1967), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.156.207

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.156.207 1967

  4. [4]

    W. Saam, Ground state properties of the dilute gas model of an interacting dilute mixture of fermions in a bose gas, Annals of Physics 53(2), 239 (1969), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(69)90250-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(69)90250-4 1969

  5. [5]

    Bloch , author J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard and W. Zwerger, Many-body physics with ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.80.885

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.885 2008

  6. [6]

    Giorgini , author L

    S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Theory of ultracold atomic fermi gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1215 (2008), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1215

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.1215 2008

  7. [7]

    G. Baym, H. A. Bethe and C. J. Pethick, Neutron star matter, Nuclear Physics A 175(2), 225 (1971), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(71)90281-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(71)90281-8 1971

  8. [8]

    Kobyakov and C

    D. Kobyakov and C. J. Pethick, Nucleus-nucleus interactions in the inner crust of neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C 94, 055806 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.055806

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.94.055806 2016

  9. [9]

    Schirotzek, C.-H

    A. Schirotzek, C.-H. Wu, A. Sommer and M. W. Zwierlein, Observation of fermi polarons in a tunable fermi liquid of ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 230402 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.230402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.230402 2009

  10. [10]

    Nascimb\`ene, N

    S. Nascimb\`ene, N. Navon, K. J. Jiang, L. Tarruell, M. Teichmann, J. McKeever, F. Chevy and C. Salomon, Collective oscillations of an imbalanced fermi gas: Axial compression modes and polaron effective mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 170402 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.170402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.170402 2009

  11. [11]

    Kohstall, M

    C. Kohstall, M. Zaccanti, M. Jag, A. Trenkwalder, P. Massignan, G. M. Bruun, F. Schreck and R. Grimm, Metastability and coherence of repulsive polarons in a strongly interacting fermi mixture, Nature 485, 615 (2012)

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Catani, G

    J. Catani, G. Lamporesi, D. Naik, M. Gring, M. Inguscio, F. Minardi, A. Kantian and T. Giamarchi, Quantum dynamics of impurities in a one-dimensional bose gas, Phys. Rev. A 85, 023623 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.85.023623

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.85.023623 2012

  13. [13]

    o hlich , M. Feld and M. K \

    M. Koschorreck , D. Pertot , E. Vogt , B. Fr \"o hlich , M. Feld and M. K \"o hl , Attractive and repulsive Fermi polarons in two dimensions , Nature 485, 619 (2012), doi:10.1038/nature11151

    work page doi:10.1038/nature11151 2012

  14. [14]

    Zhang, W

    Y. Zhang, W. Ong, I. Arakelyan and J. E. Thomas, Polaron-to-polaron transitions in the radio-frequency spectrum of a quasi-two-dimensional fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 235302 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.235302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.235302 2012

  15. [15]

    A. N. Wenz, G. Z \"u rn, S. Murmann, I. Brouzos, T. Lompe and S. Jochim, From few to many: Observing the formation of a fermi sea one atom at a time, Science 342(6157), 457 (2013), doi:10.1126/science.1240516

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1240516 2013

  16. [16]

    W. Ong, C. Cheng, I. Arakelyan and J. E. Thomas, Spin-imbalanced quasi-two-dimensional fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 110403 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.110403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.110403 2015

  17. [17]

    Cetina, M

    M. Cetina, M. Jag, R. S. Lous, J. T. M. Walraven, R. Grimm, R. S. Christensen and G. M. Bruun, Decoherence of impurities in a fermi sea of ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 135302 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.135302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.135302 2015

  18. [18]

    Cetina, M

    M. Cetina, M. Jag, R. S. Lous, I. Fritsche, J. T. M. Walraven, R. Grimm, J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, R. Schmidt, M. Knap and E. Demler, Ultrafast many-body interferometry of impurities coupled to a fermi sea, Science 354(6308), 96 (2016), doi:10.1126/science.aaf5134

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aaf5134 2016

  19. [19]

    M.-G. Hu, M. J. Van de Graaff, D. Kedar, J. P. Corson, E. A. Cornell and D. S. Jin, Bose polarons in the strongly interacting regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 055301 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.055301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.055301 2016

  20. [20]

    N. B. J rgensen, L. Wacker, K. T. Skalmstang, M. M. Parish, J. Levinsen, R. S. Christensen, G. M. Bruun and J. J. Arlt, Observation of attractive and repulsive polarons in a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 055302 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.055302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.055302 2016

  21. [21]

    Scazza, G

    F. Scazza, G. Valtolina, P. Massignan, A. Recati, A. Amico, A. Burchianti, C. Fort, M. Inguscio, M. Zaccanti and G. Roati, Repulsive fermi polarons in a resonant mixture of ultracold ^6 li atoms , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 083602 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.083602

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.083602 2017

  22. [22]

    Mukherjee , author Z

    B. Mukherjee, Z. Yan, P. B. Patel, Z. Hadzibabic, T. Yefsah, J. Struck and M. W. Zwierlein, Homogeneous atomic fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 123401 (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.123401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.123401 2017

  23. [23]

    Z. Yan, P. B. Patel, B. Mukherjee, R. J. Fletcher, J. Struck and M. W. Zwierlein, Boiling a unitary fermi liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 093401 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.093401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.093401 2019

  24. [24]

    ofer, J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, I. Bloch and S. F\

    N. Darkwah Oppong, L. Riegger, O. Bettermann, M. H\"ofer, J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, I. Bloch and S. F\"olling, Observation of coherent multiorbital polarons in a two-dimensional fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 193604 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.193604

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.193604 2019

  25. [25]

    Z. Z. Yan, Y. Ni, C. Robens and M. W. Zwierlein, Bose polarons near quantum criticality, Science 368(6487), 190 (2020), doi:10.1126/science.aax5850

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aax5850 2020

  26. [26]

    G. Ness, C. Shkedrov, Y. Florshaim, O. K. Diessel, J. von Milczewski, R. Schmidt and Y. Sagi, Observation of a smooth polaron-molecule transition in a degenerate fermi gas, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041019 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.041019

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.041019 2020

  27. [27]

    H. S. Adlong, W. E. Liu, F. Scazza, M. Zaccanti, N. D. Oppong, S. F\"olling, M. M. Parish and J. Levinsen, Quasiparticle lifetime of the repulsive fermi polaron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 133401 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.133401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.133401 2020

  28. [28]

    Fritsche, C

    I. Fritsche, C. Baroni, E. Dobler, E. Kirilov, B. Huang, R. Grimm, G. M. Bruun and P. Massignan, Stability and breakdown of fermi polarons in a strongly interacting fermi-bose mixture, Phys. Rev. A 103, 053314 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.103.053314

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.103.053314 2021

  29. [29]

    M. G. Skou, T. G. Skov, N. B. J rgensen, K. K. Nielsen, A. Camacho-Guardian, T. Pohl, G. M. Bruun and J. J. Arlt, Non-equilibrium quantum dynamics and formation of the bose polaron, Nat. Phys. 17(6), 731 (2021), doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01184-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01184-5 2021

  30. [30]

    Cayla, P

    H. Cayla, P. Massignan, T. Giamarchi, A. Aspect, C. I. Westbrook and D. Cl\'ement, Observation of 1/ k ^ 4 -tails after expansion of bose-einstein condensates with impurities , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 153401 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.153401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.153401 2023

  31. [31]

    Baroni, B

    C. Baroni, B. Huang, I. Fritsche, E. Dobler, G. Anich, E. Kirilov, R. Grimm, M. A. Bastarrachea-Magnani, P. Massignan and G. M. Bruun, Mediated interactions between fermi polarons and the role of impurity quantum statistics, Nature Physics 20(1), 68 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02248-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02248-4 2024

  32. [32]

    F. J. Vivanco, A. Schuckert, S. Huang, G. L. Schumacher, G. G. T. Assumpção, Y. Ji, J. Chen, M. Knap and N. Navon, The strongly driven fermi polaron, Nature Physics 21(4), 564 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41567-025-02799-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-025-02799-8 2025

  33. [33]

    Etrych, G

    J. Etrych, G. Martirosyan, A. Cao, C. J. Ho, Z. Hadzibabic and C. Eigen, Universal quantum dynamics of bose polarons, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021070 (2025), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.15.021070

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.15.021070 2025

  34. [34]

    Takemura, S

    N. Takemura, S. Trebaol, M. Wouters, M. T. Portella-Oberli and B. Deveaud, Polaritonic Feshbach resonance , Nat. Phys. 10(7), 500 (2014), doi:10.1038/nphys2999

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys2999 2014

  35. [35]

    Sidler, P

    M. Sidler, P. Back, O. Cotlet, A. Srivastava, T. Fink, M. Kroner, E. Demler and A. Imamoglu, Fermi polaron-polaritons in charge-tunable atomically thin semiconductors, Nature Physics 13(3), 255 (2017), doi:10.1038/nphys3949

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys3949 2017

  36. [36]

    L. B. Tan, O. Cotlet, A. Bergschneider, R. Schmidt, P. Back, Y. Shimazaki, M. Kroner and A. Imamoglu, Interacting polaron-polaritons, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021011 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021011

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.021011 2020

  37. [37]

    Wagner, E

    K. Wagner, E. Wietek, J. D. Ziegler, M. A. Semina, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Zipfel, M. M. Glazov and A. Chernikov, Autoionization and dressing of excited excitons by free carriers in monolayer wse _ 2 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 267401 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.267401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.267401 2020

  38. [38]

    E. Liu, J. van Baren, Z. Lu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D. Smirnov, Y.-C. Chang and C. H. Lui, Exciton-polaron rydberg states in monolayer mose2 and wse2, Nature Communications 12(1), 6131 (2021), doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26304-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26304-w 2021

  39. [39]

    J. B. Muir, J. Levinsen, S. K. Earl, M. A. Conway, J. H. Cole, M. Wurdack, R. Mishra, D. J. Ing, E. Estrecho, Y. Lu, D. K. Efimkin, J. O. Tollerud et al., Interactions between fermi polarons in monolayer ws2, Nature Communications 13(1), 6164 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33811-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33811-x 2022

  40. [40]

    L. B. Tan, O. K. Diessel, A. Popert, R. Schmidt, A. Imamoglu and M. Kroner, Bose polaron interactions in a cavity-coupled monolayer semiconductor, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031036 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.031036

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.031036 2023

  41. [41]

    Huang, K

    D. Huang, K. Sampson, Y. Ni, Z. Liu, D. Liang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, H. Li, E. Martin, J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish, E. Tutuc et al., Quantum dynamics of attractive and repulsive polarons in a doped mose _ 2 monolayer , Phys. Rev. X 13, 011029 (2023), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011029

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.011029 2023

  42. [42]

    Y. Ni, D. Huang, D. Liang, A. Liu, X. Liu, K. Sampson, Z. Liu, J. Quan, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. K. Efimkin, J. Levinsen et al., Valley-mediated singlet- and triplet-polaron interactions and quantum dynamics in a doped wse _ 2 monolayer , Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 036901 (2025), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.036901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.036901 2025

  43. [43]

    Chevy and C

    F. Chevy and C. Mora, Ultra-cold polarized fermi gases, Rep. Progr. Phys. 73(11), 112401 (2010), doi:10.1088/0034-4885/73/11/112401

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/73/11/112401 2010

  44. [44]

    Massignan, M

    P. Massignan, M. Zaccanti and G. M. Bruun, Polarons, dressed molecules and itinerant ferromagnetism in ultracold fermi gases, Reports on Progress in Physics 77(3), 034401 (2014), doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/3/034401

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/77/3/034401 2014

  45. [45]

    Scazza, M

    F. Scazza, M. Zaccanti, P. Massignan, M. M. Parish and J. Levinsen, Repulsive fermi and bose polarons in quantum gases, Atoms 10(2) (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    M. M. Parish and J. Levinsen, Fermi polarons and beyond, In Proceedings of the International School of Physics ``Enrico Fermi'', edited by R. Grimm, M. Inguscio, G. Lamporesi, S. Stringari. IOS Press, Varenna, doi:10.3254/ENFI250018 (2025)

    work page doi:10.3254/enfi250018 2025

  47. [47]

    Polarons in atomic gases and two-dimensional semiconductors

    P. Massignan, R. Schmidt, G. E. Astrakharchik, A. İmamoglu, M. Zwierlein, J. J. Arlt and G. M. Bruun, Polarons in atomic gases and two-dimensional semiconductors (2025), 2501.09618

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Yu and C

    Z. Yu and C. J. Pethick, Induced interactions in dilute atomic gases and liquid helium mixtures, Phys. Rev. A 85, 063616 (2012), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.85.063616

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.85.063616 2012

  49. [49]

    Camacho-Guardian and G

    A. Camacho-Guardian and G. M. Bruun, Landau effective interaction between quasiparticles in a Bose-Einstein condensate , Phys. Rev. X 8, 031042 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031042

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031042 2018

  50. [50]

    Paredes, G

    R. Paredes, G. Bruun and A. Camacho-Guardian, Interactions mediated by atoms, photons, electrons, and excitons, Phys. Rev. A 110, 030101 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.110.030101

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.110.030101 2024

  51. [51]

    Levinsen, O

    J. Levinsen, O. Bleu and M. M. Parish, Medium-enhanced polaron repulsion in a dilute Bose mixture , Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 113402 (2025), doi:10.1103/x2xb-6hzv

    work page doi:10.1103/x2xb-6hzv 2025

  52. [52]

    Mora and F

    C. Mora and F. Chevy, Normal phase of an imbalanced fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 230402 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.230402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.230402 2010

  53. [53]

    Nascimb \` e ne, N

    S. Nascimb \` e ne, N. Navon, K. J. Jiang, F. Chevy and C. Salomon, Exploring the thermodynamics of a universal Fermi gas , Nature 463, 1057 (2010), doi:10.1038/nature08814

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08814 2010

  54. [54]

    B. J. DeSalvo, K. Patel, G. Cai and C. Chin, Observation of fermion-mediated interactions between bosonic atoms , Nature 568, 61 (2019), doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1055-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1055-0 2019

  55. [55]

    D. O. Edwards, D. F. Brewer, P. Seligman, M. Skertic and M. Yaqub, Solubility of he ^ 3 in liquid he ^ 4 at 0 ^ k , Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 773 (1965), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.15.773

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.15.773 1965

  56. [56]

    A. C. Anderson, D. O. Edwards, W. R. Roach, R. E. Sarwinski and J. C. Wheatley, Thermal and magnetic properties of dilute solutions of he ^ 3 in he ^ 4 at low temperatures , Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 367 (1966), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.17.367

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.17.367 1966

  57. [57]

    Massignan, C

    P. Massignan, C. J. Pethick and H. Smith, Static properties of positive ions in atomic bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 71, 023606 (2005), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.023606

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.71.023606 2005

  58. [58]

    Z. Yu, S. Z\"ollner and C. J. Pethick, Comment on ``normal phase of an imbalanced fermi gas'', Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 188901 (2010), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.188901

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.188901 2010

  59. [59]

    Camacho-Guardian, L

    A. Camacho-Guardian, L. A. Pe\ na Ardila, T. Pohl and G. M. Bruun, Bipolarons in a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 013401 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.013401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.013401 2018

  60. [60]

    P. Naidon, Two impurities in a bose–einstein condensate: From yukawa to efimov attracted polarons, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 87(4), 043002 (2018), doi:10.7566/JPSJ.87.043002

    work page doi:10.7566/jpsj.87.043002 2018

  61. [61]

    T. Enss, B. Tran, M. Rautenberg, M. Gerken, E. Lippi, M. Drescher, B. Zhu, M. Weidem\"uller and M. Salmhofer, Scattering of two heavy fermi polarons: Resonances and quasibound states, Phys. Rev. A 102, 063321 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.102.063321

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.102.063321 2020

  62. [62]

    G. Cai, H. Ando, S. McCusker and C. Chin, Fermion mediated pairing in the ruderman-kittel-kasuya-yosida to efimov transition regime (2025), 2502.06266

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Levinsen and M

    J. Levinsen and M. M. Parish, Strongly interacting two-dimensional Fermi gases , Annual Review of Cold Atoms and Molecules 3, 1 (2015)

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    J. T. Devreese and A. S. Alexandrov, Fr \" o hlich polaron and bipolaron: recent developments , Rep. Prog. Phys. 72(6), 066501 (2009)

    work page 2009

  65. [65]

    Grusdt and E

    F. Grusdt and E. Demler, New theoretical approaches to bose polarons, In Proceedings of the International School of Physics ``Enrico Fermi'', edited by M. Inguscio, W. Ketterle, S. Stringari, and G. Roati. IOS Press, Varenna (2015)

    work page 2015

  66. [66]

    Novikov and M

    A. Novikov and M. Ovchinnikov, A diagrammatic calculation of the energy spectrum of quantum impurity in degenerate bose--einstein condensate, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 42(13), 135301 (2009)

    work page 2009

  67. [67]

    Bei-Bing and W

    H. Bei-Bing and W. Shao-Long, Polaron in Bose–Einstein –condensation system , Chinese Physics Letters 26(8), 080302 (2009), doi:10.1088/0256-307X/26/8/080302

    work page doi:10.1088/0256-307x/26/8/080302 2009

  68. [68]

    Casteels and M

    W. Casteels and M. Wouters, Polaron formation in the vicinity of a narrow feshbach resonance, Phys. Rev. A 90, 043602 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.90.043602

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.90.043602 2014

  69. [69]

    R. S. Christensen, J. Levinsen and G. M. Bruun, Quasiparticle properties of a mobile impurity in a bose-einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 160401 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.160401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.160401 2015

  70. [70]

    S. P. Rath and R. Schmidt, Field-theoretical study of the bose polaron, Phys. Rev. A 88(5) (2013)

    work page 2013

  71. [71]

    Li and S

    W. Li and S. Das Sarma, Variational study of polarons in bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 90, 013618 (2014), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.90.013618

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.90.013618 2014

  72. [72]

    Levinsen, M

    J. Levinsen, M. M. Parish and G. M. Bruun, Impurity in a Bose-Einstein condensate and the Efimov effect , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 125302 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.125302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.125302 2015

  73. [73]

    L. A. Pe\ na Ardila and S. Giorgini, Impurity in a bose-einstein condensate: Study of the attractive and repulsive branch using quantum monte carlo methods, Phys. Rev. A 92, 033612 (2015), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.92.033612

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.92.033612 2015

  74. [74]

    L. A. Pe \ n a Ardila and S. Giorgini, Bose polaron problem: Effect of mass imbalance on binding energy, Phys. Rev. A 94, 063640 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.94.063640

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.94.063640 2016

  75. [75]

    Y. E. Shchadilova, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt and E. Demler, Quantum dynamics of ultracold bose polarons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 113002 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.113002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.113002 2016

  76. [76]

    Massignan, N

    P. Massignan, N. Yegovtsev and V. Gurarie, Universal aspects of a strongly interacting impurity in a dilute bose condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 123403 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.123403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.123403 2021

  77. [77]

    L. A. Pe\ na Ardila, G. E. Astrakharchik and S. Giorgini, Strong coupling bose polarons in a two-dimensional gas, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023405 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023405

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.023405 2020

  78. [78]

    L. F. Cárdenas-Castillo and A. Camacho-Guardian, Strongly interacting bose polarons in two-dimensional atomic gases and quantum fluids of polaritons, Atoms 11(1) (2023), doi:10.3390/atoms11010003

    work page doi:10.3390/atoms11010003 2023

  79. [79]

    Nakano, M

    Y. Nakano, M. M. Parish and J. Levinsen, Variational approach to the two-dimensional bose polaron, Phys. Rev. A 109, 013325 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.109.013325

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.109.013325 2024

  80. [80]

    Levinsen, F

    J. Levinsen, F. M. Marchetti, J. Keeling and M. M. Parish, Spectroscopic signatures of quantum many-body correlations in polariton microcavities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 266401 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.266401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.266401 2019

Showing first 80 references.