Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 66 references

Graphite intercalated with α-RuCl3 forms a new 3D platform whose graphene Fermi surface is heavily reconstructed by charge transfer.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Stage-2 and stage-4 graphite intercalated with α-RuCl3 were synthesized; X-ray diffraction and Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations, backed by DFT, show a strongly hole-doped graphene Fermi surface from charge transfer.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-03 challenge →

load-bearing objection Plausible new GIC with two good experimental handles but unverified intercalant identity; deserves review with an order for compositional checks. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.03147 v4 pith:N65YJW2L submitted 2025-12-02 cond-mat.str-el

$\alpha$-RuCl$_3$ intercalated into graphite: a new three-dimensional platform for exotic quantum phases

Aleksandar Razpopov , Shirin Mozaffari , Takahiro Matsuoka , Matthew Cothrine , Nan Huang , Miaofang Chi , Roser Valent\'i , David Mandrus This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords graphite intercalation compoundsα-RuCl3Kitaev magnetShubnikov–de Haas oscillationscharge transferFermi surface reconstructionvan der Waals heterostructuresfirst-principles calculations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first synthesis of graphite intercalated with α-RuCl3, yielding stage-2 and stage-4 crystals with c-axis expansions to about 25.4 Å and 58.2 Å. Shubnikov–de Haas measurements show the graphene Fermi surface is substantially rebuilt: quantum oscillation frequencies jump from roughly 4–5 T in pristine graphite to about 91 T and 170–176 T. First-principles calculations attribute this to charge transfer from graphene to α-RuCl3, with little hybridization, and show the stacking sequence controls the number and size of hole pockets. The claim is that this is a bulk three-dimensional analogue of graphene/α-RuCl3 heterostructures, opening a route to flat-band, magnetic, and topological phases in a macroscopic crystal.

Core claim

We synthesized graphite intercalated with α-RuCl3 via two-zone vapor transport using AgCl as a chlorine source, obtaining stage-2 and stage-4 crystals with lattice constants c = 25.4(2) Å and 58.2(1) Å. X-ray diffraction suggests stackings A|AB|B for stage 2 and AB|BCAB|BC or AB|BABA|AB for stage 4. Transport shows Shubnikov–de Haas frequencies α ≈ 91 T and β ≈ 170–176 T, far above graphite's ~4–5 T, indicating a reconstructed Fermi surface. DFT calculations using simplified supercells show graphene donates charge to α-RuCl3, the graphene bands remain largely unhybridized, and the resulting hole pockets around the K points reproduce the measured oscillation frequencies once modest Fermi-leve

What carries the argument

The central object is a graphite intercalation compound in which α-RuCl3 layers occupy the van der Waals gaps of graphite, forming stage-2 and stage-4 crystals. The mechanism carrying the argument is charge transfer: graphene layers donate electrons to α-RuCl3, with accumulation at interfacial chlorine atoms, rigidly shifting the graphene bands and creating hole pockets. The extremal areas of these pockets, computed from first-principles Fermi surfaces via the Onsager relation, are compared with measured Shubnikov–de Haas frequencies. The DFT treatment uses reduced (tensile-strained) supercells, justified by the insensitivity of charge transfer to strain and relative orientation.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes the intercalated species is α-RuCl3 based on c-axis expansion and analogy to other metal trichlorides, but it reports no direct elemental or chemical probe confirming ruthenium and chlorine in the gallery.

What would settle it

Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy or X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy on the intercalated crystals showing no ruthenium, or a Cl:Ru ratio far from 3:1, would falsify the central claim; alternatively, an XRD control annealed in chlorine alone that reproduces the 25.4 Å or 58.2 Å expansion would indicate chlorine-only intercalation.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, C-RuCl3 provides a bulk 3D analogue of graphene/α-RuCl3 heterostructures, making interfacial charge-transfer and proximity physics accessible in macroscopic crystals without exfoliation.
  • The stacking sequence—the number of graphene layers between α-RuCl3 sheets—tunes the number and size of Fermi-surface hole pockets, serving as a design knob for band structure.
  • The material combines multilayer-graphene flat-band physics with proximity to a Kitaev spin-liquid candidate, potentially hosting coupled electronic and magnetic phases in three dimensions.
  • The large increase in Shubnikov–de Haas frequencies offers a clear experimental signature for detecting intercalation stage and quality in future samples.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the intercalant identity is confirmed as α-RuCl3, the same vapor-transport route could generalize to other metal trichlorides or Kitaev candidates, creating a family of magnetically intercalated graphites.
  • The predicted layer-dependent charge depletion in stage-4 samples implies inner graphene layers are partially screened from doping; this could be tested with layer-resolved photoemission or by measuring stage-dependent oscillation frequencies.
  • The claimed absence of hybridization suggests α-RuCl3's magnetic state may survive intercalation; neutron scattering on large crystals could look for Kitaev spin-liquid signatures in a bulk 3D host.
  • The DFT sensitivity to interlayer spacing means controlled pressure experiments could tune the Fermi surface and possibly switch the observed oscillation pattern, offering a direct way to validate the structural model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the synthesis of graphite intercalated with α-RuCl3 via a two-zone chemical vapor transport method using an AgCl-generated Cl2 atmosphere. Based on XRD c-axis expansions from 6.7 Å to 25.4(2) Å (stage 2) and 58.2(1) Å (stage 4), plus a-axis values near 29.5 Å, the authors assign stacking sequences by analogy to FeCl3/CrCl3/AlCl3 graphite intercalation compounds. Magnetotransport shows Shubnikov–de Haas frequencies α ≈ 91 T and β ≈ 170–176 T, much larger than the 4–5 T frequencies of pristine graphite. DFT calculations on simplified supercells predict graphene→α-RuCl3 charge transfer, hole pockets of stacking-dependent multiplicity, and SdH frequencies that are brought into 'good agreement' after applying modest Fermi-level shifts of about 0.1 eV. The paper concludes that C-RuCl3 is a new three-dimensional platform combining multilayer-graphene physics with the magnetic/correlated properties of α-RuCl3.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, this would be a genuinely new bulk intercalation compound, potentially extending the physics of graphene/α-RuCl3 heterostructures and rhombohedral multilayer graphene into three dimensions. The manuscript has real strengths: it combines two independent experimental handles (large c-axis expansion and strongly shifted SdH frequencies), it is explicit about the structural assumptions underlying the stage/stacking assignment, and the computational section includes useful benchmarks for strain and orientation effects. The DFT methodology is described in detail, and the supplementary material provides additional checks. However, the load-bearing identification of the intercalated species as intact α-RuCl3 is not established by any composition-sensitive probe, and the DFT-to-experiment comparison for SdH frequencies relies on a post hoc Fermi-level shift that is not independently determined. Both issues are addressable, but they are central to the paper's claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, 'Structure analysis'; Table I; Results, 'Synthesis'] The central claim that the intercalant is intact α-RuCl3 is not directly established. The structure analysis explicitly rests on assumptions 1–4 (incommensurate RuCl3, supercell construction, interlayer distances, AB/AA stacking rules), and Table I labels the stackings as 'suggested'. No composition-sensitive probe (EDS, XPS, neutron scattering, TEM) is reported. Because the synthesis deliberately adds excess Cl2 ('without excess Cl2, α-RuCl3 would not intercalate') and the Cl2-only control in Fig. 2b is compared only by resistivity, with no XRD shown, chlorine-only or RuClx-containing intercalants are not excluded. Since all subsequent DFT and physical interpretation assume α-RuCl3 layers, this is a load-bearing gap. Please provide composition-sensitive characterization of the intercalated crystals and an XRD control for the Cl2-only anneal.
  2. [Electronic properties; Fig. 2g,h] The DFT-vs-experiment comparison uses an adjustable Fermi-level shift. Raw computed frequencies are 131/444 T (AB|AB), 70/296 T (ABAB), and 28/311/330 T (ABCA), versus the measured α ≈ 91 T and β ≈ 170–176 T. The text then applies 'modest Fermi-level shifts (≈0.1 eV)' to obtain 27/183 T (ABAB) and 126/214 T (ABCA), claiming good agreement. This shift is a free parameter: it is not computed from charge neutrality nor from the Bader charge-transfer analysis, and no shifted values are given for the stage-2 AB|AB case. The post hoc shift weakens the quantitative confirmation; after tuning, more than one stacking can partially match the measured β line, while the α = 91 T line is attributed to a pocket that is 'pushed below the Fermi energy' in some cases. Please report the Fermi-level shift as a determined quantity, or fit it and compare all predicted frequencies (including both α and β) acr
  3. [Methods, 'Structure analysis'; Table I; 'Structure optimization and charge transfer'] The stage/stacking assignment is underconstrained. The XRD analysis yields lattice constants, but the stacking sequences in Table I are explicitly 'suggested', and the DFT calculations further simplify the experimental stackings (A|AB|B → AB|AB; AB|BCAB|BC or AB|BABA|AB → ABAB|ABAB or ABCA|ABCA) because the experimental unit cells are 'computationally prohibitive'. Since the number and size of the Fermi pockets, and hence the predicted SdH frequencies, depend on the stacking sequence, this ambiguity directly affects the central comparison. A structural refinement, or at least a clear identification of which S4 stacking is present using XRD intensities or additional diffraction data, is needed before the SdH comparison can be considered quantitative.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: 'this intercalated crystals' should be 'these intercalated crystals'.
  2. [Table I caption] Caption says 'α-Cul 3 layer'; should be 'α-RuCl3 layer'.
  3. [Introduction/Electronic properties] Typographical errors: 'heretostructures' should be 'heterostructures'; 'rombohedral' should be 'rhombohedral'.
  4. [Data availability] The sentence 'The datasets generated during the current study are available upon reasonable request. not applicable)) The authors declare no conflict of interest.' appears garbled and duplicates the conflict-of-interest statement; please clean this up.
  5. [Supplementary Figure S1] The hkl notation in Figure S1 should be clarified: the text says 'all the observed peaks are for hkl(l=0)' in the main text, while the SI says 'hkl (l≠0) reflections cannot be observed.' Please reconcile this notation, since the c-axis lattice constants are key to the intercalation claim.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Partial circularity: DFT SdH frequencies are reconciled with experiment by an adjustable 0.1 eV Fermi shift, making the claimed agreement partly by construction.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Results and Discussion, 'Electronic properties' (Onsager comparison, around Fig. 5)]
    "AB|AB (S2-like) yields two pockets (131 T, 444 T), while four-layer ABAB|ABAB and ABCA|ABCA (S4-like) produce two and three pockets (70T, 296 T, and 28T, 311 T, 330 T), respectively. Although the agreement improves, discrepancies with the experiment remain. ... Modest Fermi-level shifts (≈0.1 eV) ... bring the computed frequencies into good agreement with experiment. A Fermi level shift of 0.1 eV yields two frequencies of 27 T and 183 T for the ABAB|ABAB stacking, and 126 T and 214 T for the ABCA|ABCA stacking."

    The raw DFT frequencies (131/444 T, 70/296 T, 28/311/330 T) do not match the measured α≈91 T, β≈170–176 T. The 0.1 eV Fermi shift is not independently determined from a separate measurement or parameter-free calculation; it is chosen as a plausible adjustment and the shifted values are then presented as bringing theory into 'good agreement' with experiment. Thus the comparison is closed by an input tuned after the fact rather than by a genuinely predictive calculation. Moreover, the measured α=91 T is not reproduced even after the shift; it is instead rationalized by pushing the inner pocket below the Fermi energy, which further indicates that the match is selected rather than predicted.

full rationale

The paper is mostly a self-contained experimental and computational study: synthesis, XRD, transport, SdH, and DFT are all reported directly. The structural assignments are explicitly tentative ('suggested stacking', assumptions 1–4 in Methods, only l=0 XRD reflections observed), which is a limitation but not a circular derivation. Self-citations [12,35] supporting charge transfer are not load-bearing because Bader analysis is performed in this work. The one genuinely circular element is the DFT SdH comparison: raw computed frequencies disagree with the measured α≈91 T, β≈170–176 T, and a 0.1 eV Fermi-level shift is then applied to bring them into agreement. Since that shift is an adjustable input rather than a predicted output, the claimed agreement is partly by construction. However, the central claim of a new intercalated platform rests mainly on the large c-axis expansion and the dramatic SdH frequency increase relative to graphite, which do not reduce to the tuned DFT match. The absence of a composition-sensitive probe for the intercalant (no EDS/XPS/TEM; Cl2-only control lacks XRD) is a serious external-validity threat, but it is an assumption issue, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim (successful intercalation of α-RuCl3 into graphite, stage 2/4) rests on XRD c-axis expansion interpreted through four heuristic structural assumptions plus analogy to FeCl3/CrCl3/AlCl3 GICs, with no compositional/chemical probe of the intercalant. The DFT-to-experiment frequency comparison additionally depends on GGA-DFT adequacy, the 4%-strain simplification, fixed interlayer distances, and a hand-applied 0.1 eV Fermi-level shift to close the gap with the measured SdH frequencies. No new entities are invented.

free parameters (3)
  • Fermi-level shift ΔE = ≈0.1 eV
    Applied to the computed graphene band structures so that unfolded Fermi-surface areas yield frequencies near the measured α≈91 T and β≈170–176 T (27/183 T for ABAB, 126/214 T for ABCA). Raw computed frequencies (70/296 T, 28/311/330 T, 131/444 T) do not match experiment; the shift is justified as plausible interlayer-spacing variation, but it is the parameter that closes the theory–experiment gap.
  • Interlayer distances d_Gr-RuCl3 and d_Gr-Gr = 3.60 Å / 3.54 Å
    Fixed by hand from 'the average experimental value' and prior reports; the paper states the Fermi-surface areas are highly sensitive to these distances, and the 0.1 eV shift is explicitly attributed to plausible variations in them.
  • Tensile strain on α-RuCl3 layer = ≈4%
    Simplified 2×2 RuCl3 / 5×5 graphene supercells replace the experimental ~29.6 Å incommensurate cells. The simplification is benchmarked against an unstrained cell for charge transfer only, not for Fermi-surface areas or oscillation frequencies.
axioms (7)
  • standard math Onsager relation F = (ℏ/2πe)·S maps Fermi-surface cross-sectional areas to SdH frequencies.
    Used in 'Electronic properties' to convert computed hole-pocket areas into the reported oscillation frequencies.
  • domain assumption Non-spin-polarized GGA-DFT (PBE) adequately describes the graphene-derived bands, Fermi surfaces, and charge transfer in C-RuCl3.
    No benchmark against experiment for the intercalated system beyond the SdH comparison, which itself requires the 0.1 eV shift to agree.
  • domain assumption α-RuCl3 remains insulating upon intercalation, so only graphene layers contribute to the observed quantum oscillations.
    Invoked in 'Electronic properties' citing ref [38]; if the RuCl3 layers became metallic or hybridized, the pocket assignment would change.
  • ad hoc to paper Heuristic structural assumptions 1–4: RuCl3 incommensurate with graphite; supercell combines n×m RuCl3 with N×M graphene; graphene–graphene spacing 3.5–4 Å; graphene–RuCl3–graphene sandwich 9–10 Å; stacking rules AB/AC/BC with AA/BB/CC equivalent.
    These assumptions convert the measured c-axis values (25.4, 58.2 Å) and (00l)/(hk0) peaks into the stage-2/stage-4 assignments; Table I labels the stackings only as 'suggested.'
  • domain assumption The 4%-strained reduced supercell reproduces the physics of the experimental incommensurate supercell, including insensitivity to relative layer orientation and stacking-sequence simplification (e.g., A|AB|B → AB|AB).
    Benchmarked for charge-transfer magnitude only; the stacking simplification is justified by charge-transfer insensitivity, not by direct Fermi-surface comparison.
  • standard math Bader charge analysis provides a meaningful decomposition of charge transfer between graphene and α-RuCl3.
    Used for all charge-transfer numbers (Fig. 3b); Bader decomposition at van der Waals interfaces is scheme-dependent, and no alternative decomposition is reported.
  • domain assumption Pristine multilayer-graphene band structures (including rhombohedral flat bands) carry over to the graphene sections of the intercalate.
    The flat-band narrative in Fig. 4 compares intercalated structures to pristine multilayer graphene references; the comparison is qualitative.

reviewed 2026-08-03 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $\alpha$-RuCl$_3$ intercalated into graphite: a new three-dimensional platform for exotic quantum phases." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N65YJW2L

@misc{pith2026251203147,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $\alpha$-RuCl$_3$ intercalated into graphite: a new three-dimensional platform for exotic quantum phases},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N65YJW2L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.03147}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

Multilayer graphene with different stacking sequences has emerged as a powerful setting for correlated and topological phases. In parallel, progress in graphene heterostructures with magnetic or correlated materials-most notably the Kitaev candidate $\alpha$-RuCl$_3$-has demonstrated charge transfer, magnetic proximity effects, and interfacial reconstruction, creating new opportunities for engineered quantum systems. Motivated by these developments, we explore a three-dimensional analogue in which $\alpha$-RuCl$_3$ layers are inserted directly into the van der Waals gaps of graphite, forming an intercalated system. Here, we report the successful synthesis and comprehensive characterization of graphite intercalated with $\alpha$-RuCl$_3$. Using a combination of X-ray diffraction, quantum oscillation measurements, and first-principles electronic structure calculations, we study the structural and electronic properties of these intercalated crystals. Our results demonstrate that graphite intercalated with $\alpha$-RuCl$_3$ offers a robust route to develop three-dimensional materials with access to novel correlated and topological states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.03147 by Aleksandar Razpopov, David Mandrus, Matthew Cothrine, Miaofang Chi, Nan Huang, Roser Valent\'i, Shirin Mozaffari, Takahiro Matsuoka.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Different intercalation stackings: a A|A, b AB|AB (stage 2: S2), c ABAB|ABAB (stage 4: S4), and d ABCA|ABCA (stage 4: S4). e Stacking top view. The α-RuCl3 layer is denoted by a blue layer, while the labels A,B, and C denote the different graphene stackings. f The upper panel illustrates charge transfer effects due to proximity of α-RuCl3 to graphene. The lower panel depicts the evolution of the band struc… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a Schematic of two-zone vapor transport using AgCl as a chlorine source to grow C-RuCl3 samples. b Temperature dependence of the longitudinal resistivity of Kish graphite as received and after annealing in Cl2 gas, and C-RuCl3 stage 2 sample. c, d, and e Magnetic field dependence of the longitudinal resistivity ρxx of Kish graphite, C-RuCl3 stage 2, and C-RuCl3 stage 4 samples, respectively. f, g, and h Fa… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: a Representative ABCA|ABCA crystal structure of C-RuCl3 used in the DFT calculations. The blue and yellow iso-surfaces show the charge depletion and accumulation, respectively. dGr−Gr denotes the graphene-graphene layer distance, and dGr−RuCl3 the distance α-RuCl3-graphene layer distance. b The planar-averaged charge density redistribution along the c-axis for each geometry as a function of the Ru layer di… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Unfolded electronic band structure of the C-RuCl [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Unfolded Fermi surface of the graphene layers C-RuCl [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    RuCl 3 crystallizes in a solid composed of Cl 3Ru2Cl3 and is incommensurate with the graphite host

  2. [2]

    Here,n,m,N, andMare inte- gers

    The graphene and RuCl 3 layers form a supercell con- structed by combiningn×munit cells of RuCl 3 and N×Mof graphene. Here,n,m,N, andMare inte- gers

  3. [3]

    The inter-layer distance between adjacent graphenes is about 3.5∼4 ˚A, and the distance between two graphene layers that sandwich a RuCl 3 layer is about 9∼10 ˚A

  4. [4]

    Two graphene layers that sandwich RuCl 3 in between stack AA, BB, or CC (all three are equiv- alent)

    Two adjacent graphene layers are stacked as AB, AC, or BC (Natural graphite has ABAB or ABCABC stacking). Two graphene layers that sandwich RuCl 3 in between stack AA, BB, or CC (all three are equiv- alent). Figures S1aandbin the supplemental material show the hklindexing for the single crystal samples. Note that all the observed peaks are forhkl(l=0) due...

  5. [5]

    S. C. de la Barrera, S. Aronson, Z. Zheng, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Q. Ma, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and R. Ashoori, Cascade of isospin phase transitions in bernal-stacked bi- layer graphene at zero magnetic field, Nature Physics18, 771 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Z. Li, X. Kuang, A. Jimeno-Pozo, H. Sainz-Cruz, Z. Zhan, S. Yuan, and F. Guinea, Charge fluctuations, phonons, and superconductivity in multilayer graphene, Physical Review B108, 045404 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    Wagner, Y

    G. Wagner, Y. H. Kwan, N. Bultinck, S. H. Simon, and S. Parameswaran, Superconductivity from repulsive interac- tions in bernal-stacked bilayer graphene, Physical Review B 110, 214517 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    Henck, J

    H. Henck, J. Avila, Z. Ben Aziza, D. Pierucci, J. Baima, B. Pamuk, J. Chaste, D. Utt, M. Bartos, K. Nogajew- ski,et al., Flat electronic bands in long sequences of rhombohedral-stacked graphene, Physical Review B97, 245421 (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    J. Dong, T. Wang, T. Wang, T. Soejima, M. P. Zaletel, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Anomalous hall crystals in rhombohedral multilayer graphene. i. interaction-driven chern bands and fractional quantum hall states at zero mag- netic field, Physical Review Letters133, 206503 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    B. A. Bernevig and Y. H. Kwan, ” berry trashcan” model of interacting electrons in rhombohedral graphene, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09692 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    W. Zhou, J. Ding, J. Hua, L. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, W. Zhu, and S. Xu, Layer-polarized ferromag- netism in rhombohedral multilayer graphene, Nature Com- munications15, 2597 (2024)

    2024

  12. [12]

    Y. Choi, Y. Choi, M. Valentini, C. L. Patterson, L. F. Holleis, O. I. Sheekey, H. Stoyanov, X. Cheng, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe,et al., Superconductivity and quantized anomalous hall effect in rhombohedral graphene, Nature , 1 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, Z. Hadjri, L. Shi, Z. Wu, W. Xu, Y. Yao, A. A. Cotten, O. Sharifi Sedeh, H. Weldeyesus,et al., Signa- tures of chiral superconductivity in rhombohedral graphene, Nature643, 654 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    Mashhadi, Y

    S. Mashhadi, Y. Kim, J. Kim, D. Weber, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, N. Park, B. Lotsch, J. H. Smet, M. Burghard, et al., Spin-split band hybridization in graphene proximitized withα-rucl 3 nanosheets, Nano letters19, 4659 (2019)

    2019

  15. [15]

    B. Zhou, J. Balgley, P. Lampen-Kelley, J.-Q. Yan, D. G. Mandrus, and E. A. Henriksen, Evidence for charge transfer and proximate magnetism in graphene–α-rucl 3 heterostruc- tures, Physical Review B100, 165426 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    Biswas, Y

    S. Biswas, Y. Li, S. M. Winter, J. Knolle, and R. Valent ´ı, Electronic properties ofα−rucl 3 in proximity to graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 237201 (2019)

    2019

  17. [17]

    V. Leeb, K. Polyudov, S. Mashhadi, S. Biswas, R. Va- lent´ı, M. Burghard, and J. Knolle, Anomalous quantum os- cillations in a heterostructure of graphene on a proximate quantum spin liquid, Physical Review Letters126, 097201 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    D. J. Rizzo, B. S. Jessen, Z. Sun, F. L. Ruta, J. Zhang, J.-Q. Yan, L. Xian, A. S. McLeod, M. E. Berkowitz, K. Watanabe, et al., Charge-transfer plasmon polaritons at graphene/α- rucl3 interfaces, Nano letters20, 8438 (2020)

    2020

  19. [19]

    Banerjee, C

    A. Banerjee, C. Bridges, J.-Q. Yan, A. Aczel, L. Li, M. Stone, G. Granroth, M. Lumsden, Y. Yiu, J. Knolle, et al., Proximate kitaev quantum spin liquid behaviour in a honeycomb magnet, Nature materials15, 733 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    S. M. Winter, K. Riedl, P. A. Maksimov, A. L. Chernyshev, A. Honecker, and R. Valent ´ı, Breakdown of magnons in a strongly spin-orbital coupled magnet, Nature communica- tions8, 1152 (2017)

    2017

  21. [21]

    S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and R. Valent ´ı, Models and mate- rials for generalized kitaev magnetism, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter29, 493002 (2017)

    2017

  22. [22]

    Trebst and C

    S. Trebst and C. Hickey, Kitaev materials, Physics Reports 950, 1 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    Balgley, J

    J. Balgley, J. Butler, S. Biswas, Z. Ge, S. Lagasse, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. Cothrine, D. G. Mandrus, J. Velasco Jr,et al., Ultrasharp lateral p–n junctions in modulation-doped graphene, Nano Letters22, 4124 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    Ojeda-Aristizabal, X

    C. Ojeda-Aristizabal, X. Zheng, C. Xu, Z. Nussinov, Y. Mo- tome, A. Banerjee, A. W. Tsen, M. Knap, R.-R. Du, G. Joshi,et al., Lessons fromα-rucl 3 for pursuing quan- 9 tum spin liquid physics in atomically thin materials, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.13838 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    M. S. Dresselhaus and G. Dresselhaus, Intercalation com- pounds of graphite, Advances in Physics30, 139 (1981)

    1981

  26. [26]

    Chernyshev and O

    A. Chernyshev and O. Starykh, Roller coaster in a flatland: Magnetoresistivity in eu-intercalated graphite, Physical Re- view X12, 021010 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    Hui, F.-Y

    R. Hui, F.-Y. Kang, Q.-J. Jiao, and W.-C. Shen, Synthe- sis criterion for a metal chloride-graphite intercalation com- pound by a molten salt method, New carbon materials24, 18 (2009)

    2009

  28. [28]

    Matsumoto and Y

    R. Matsumoto and Y. Okabe, Electrical conductivity and air stability of fecl3, cucl2, mocl5, and sbcl5 graphite inter- calation compounds prepared from flexible graphite sheets, Synthetic Metals212, 62 (2016)

    2016

  29. [29]

    Flandrois, J.-M

    S. Flandrois, J.-M. Masson, J.-C. Rouillon, J. Gaultier, and C. Hauw, Intercalation compounds of graphite with nickel chloride: synthesis, structure, and mechanism of intercala- tion, Synthetic Metals3, 1 (1981)

    1981

  30. [30]

    Tzeng, P.-L

    S.-S. Tzeng, P.-L. Wang, and T.-H. Ko, Effects of process- ing parameters on the structure and amount of intercalation of copper chloride-graphite intercalation compounds, Jour- nal of materials science36, 497 (2001)

    2001

  31. [31]

    Postnikov, A

    V. Postnikov, A. Zvarykina, Y. V. Salyn’, Y. T. Struchkov, Y. N. Novikov, and M. Vol’pin, Synthesis and structure of layer-type graphite compounds with ruthenium, palladium, and osmium chlorides, Journal of Structural Chemistry18, 819 (1977)

    1977

  32. [32]

    M. S. Dresselhaus and G. Dresselhaus, Intercalation com- pounds of graphite, Advances in Physics51, 1 (2002)

    2002

  33. [33]

    J. M. Cowley and J. A. Ibers, The structures of some fer- ric chloride–graphite compounds, Acta Crystallographica9, 421 (1956)

    1956

  34. [34]

    Stumpp, The intercalation of metal chlorides and bro- mides into graphite, Materials Science and Engineering31, 53 (1977)

    E. Stumpp, The intercalation of metal chlorides and bro- mides into graphite, Materials Science and Engineering31, 53 (1977)

    1977

  35. [35]

    Camargo, Y

    B. Camargo, Y. Kopelevich, A. Usher, and S. Hubbard, Effect of structural disorder on quantum oscillations in graphite, Applied Physics Letters108(2016)

    2016

  36. [36]

    de Jesus, B

    R. de Jesus, B. Camargo, R. da Silva, Y. Kopelevich, M. Be- har, M. Gusm˜ao, and P. Pureur, Magneto-transport proper- ties of as-implanted highly oriented pyrolytic graphite, Phys- ica B: Condensed Matter500, 118 (2016)

    2016

  37. [37]

    Momma and F

    K. Momma and F. Izumi,VESTA3for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, Journal of Applied Crystallography44, 1272 (2011)

    2011

  38. [38]

    Rossi, C

    A. Rossi, C. Johnson, J. Balgley, J. C. Thomas, L. Francav- iglia, R. Dettori, A. K. Schmid, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Cothrine,et al., Direct visualization of the charge trans- fer in a graphene/α-rucl3 heterostructure via angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Nano Letters23, 8000 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    Razpopov and R

    A. Razpopov and R. Valent ´ı, Ab initio study of highly tun- able charge transfer inβ-rucl 3/graphene heterostructures, Physical Review Research6, 043026 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Falorsi, S

    F. Falorsi, S. Zhao, K. Liu, C. Eckel, J. F. P ¨ohls, W. Ben- necke, M. Reutzel, S. Mathias, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, et al., Interlayer charge transfer in graphene–2d polyimide heterostructures, 2D Materials12, 025011 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    Onsager, Interpretation of the de haas-van alphen effect, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Maga- zine and Journal of Science43, 1006 (1952)

    L. Onsager, Interpretation of the de haas-van alphen effect, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Maga- zine and Journal of Science43, 1006 (1952)

    1952

  42. [42]

    Zheng, Z.-X

    X. Zheng, Z.-X. Liu, C. Zhang, H. Zhou, C. Yang, Y. Shi, K. Tanigaki, and R.-R. Du, Incommensurate charge super- modulation and hidden dipole order in layered kitaev mate- rialα-rucl3, Nature Communications15, 7658 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Aoki and H

    M. Aoki and H. Amawashi, Dependence of band structures on stacking and field in layered graphene, Solid State Com- munications142, 123 (2007)

    2007

  44. [44]

    L. I. Johansson, R. Armiento, J. Avila, C. Xia, S. Lorcy, I. A. Abrikosov, M. C. Asensio, and C. Virojanadara, Multi- pleπ-bands and bernal stacking of multilayer graphene on c-face sic, revealed by nano-angle resolved photoemission, Scientific Reports4, 4157 (2014)

    2014

  45. [45]

    R. Yagi, T. Hirahara, R. Ebisuoka, T. Nakasuga, S. Tajima, K. Watanabe, and T. Taniguchi, Low-energy band structure and even-odd layer number effect in ab-stacked multilayer graphene, Scientific Reports8, 13018 (2018)

    2018

  46. [46]

    Zhang, Y.-Y

    Y. Zhang, Y.-Y. Zhou, S. Zhang, H. Cai, L.-H. Tong, W.-Y. Liao, R.-J. Zou, S.-M. Xue, Y. Tian, T. Chen,et al., Layer- dependent evolution of electronic structures and correlations in rhombohedral multilayer graphene, Nature Nanotechnol- ogy20, 222 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  48. [48]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gra- dient approximation made simple [phys. rev. lett. 77, 3865 (1996)], Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1396 (1997)

    1996

  49. [49]

    P. E. Bl ¨ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Physical Review B50, 17953 (1994), publisher: American Physical Society

    1994

  50. [50]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Physical Review B59, 1758 (1999), publisher: American Physical Society

    1999

  51. [51]

    D.-M. Chen, P. M. Shenai, and Y. Zhao, Tight binding description on the band gap opening of pyrene-dispersed graphene, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.13, 1515 (2011)

    2011

  52. [52]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 elements h-pu, The Journal of chemical physics132(2010)

    2010

  53. [53]

    Grimme, S

    S. Grimme, S. Ehrlich, and L. Goerigk, Effect of the damp- ing function in dispersion corrected density functional the- ory, Journal of computational chemistry32, 1456 (2011)

    2011

  54. [54]

    J. Chen, M. Weinert, and M. Chen, Kproj: A program for unfolding electronic and phononic bands, Computer Physics Communications312, 109614 (2025)

    2025

  55. [55]

    Henkelman, A

    G. Henkelman, A. Arnaldsson, and H. J ´onsson, A fast and robust algorithm for bader decomposition of charge density, Computational Materials Science36, 354 (2006)

    2006

  56. [56]

    V. Wang, N. Xu, J.-C. Liu, G. Tang, and W.-T. Geng, Vasp- kit: A user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using vasp code, Computer Physics Communications267, 108033 (2021)

    2021

  57. [57]

    Backes, D

    S. Backes, D. Guterding, H. O. Jeschke, and R. Valent ´ı, Electronic structure and de haas–van alphen frequencies in kfe2as2 within lda+ dmft, New Journal of Physics16, 083025 (2014)

    2014

  58. [58]

    Guterding, dhva: a code for calculating de haas-van 10 alphen frequencies and electronic band masses (2014), ac- cessed: 2025-03-01

    D. Guterding, dhva: a code for calculating de haas-van 10 alphen frequencies and electronic band masses (2014), ac- cessed: 2025-03-01

    2014

  59. [59]

    Julian, Numerical extraction of de haas–van alphen fre- quencies from calculated band energies, Computer Physics Communications183, 324 (2012)

    S. Julian, Numerical extraction of de haas–van alphen fre- quencies from calculated band energies, Computer Physics Communications183, 324 (2012)

    2012

  60. [60]

    Lekien and J

    F. Lekien and J. Marsden, Tricubic interpolation in three dimensions, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering63, 455 (2005). α-RuCl3 intercalated into graphite: a new three-dimensional platform for exotic quantum phases - Supplementary Information - Aleksandar Razpopov, 1,∗ Shirin Mozaffari, 2, 3,† Takahiro Matsuoka, 2, 4,‡ Matthew Coth...

    2005

  61. [61]

    B. Wolf, D. Kaib, A. Razpopov, S. Biswas, K. Riedl, S. Winter, R. Valent ´ı, Y. Saito, S. Hartmann, E. Vinokurova, et al., Combined experimental and theoretical study of hydrostatic he-gas pressure effects in α-rucl 3, Physical Review B 106, 134432 (2022)

    2022

  62. [62]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  63. [63]

    Zhou, H.-L

    Y.-C. Zhou, H.-L. Zhang, and W.-Q. Deng, A 3n rule for the electronic properties of doped graphene, Nanotechnology 24, 225705 (2013)

    2013

  64. [64]

    Biswas, Y

    S. Biswas, Y. Li, S. M. Winter, J. Knolle, and R. Valent ´ı, Electronic properties of α−rucl3 in proximity to graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 237201 (2019)

    2019

  65. [65]

    Razpopov and R

    A. Razpopov and R. Valent ´ı, Ab initio study of highly tunable charge transfer in β-rucl 3/graphene heterostructures, Physical Review Research 6, 043026 (2024)

    2024

  66. [66]

    Henkelman, A

    G. Henkelman, A. Arnaldsson, and H. J ´onsson, A fast and robust algorithm for bader decomposition of charge density, Compu- tational Materials Science 36, 354 (2006)

    2006

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 3, 2026.