pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.04495 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-04 · 🪐 quant-ph

Universal quantum control over non-Hermitian continuous-variable systems

Zhu-yao Jin , Jun Jing This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 02:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords non-Hermitian quantum mechanicscontinuous-variable systemsquantum controlstate transferbosonic modescavity magnonicsLindblad master equationnonadiabatic passages
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

A general theory allows perfect state transfer in non-Hermitian continuous-variable systems for arbitrary initial states without depending on parity-time symmetry or exceptional points.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a control theory for an arbitrary number of bosonic modes under time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. It works in the Heisenberg picture by defining instantaneous frames through time-dependent ancillary operators and using the gauge potential from transformations to stationary frames. The central step is the upper triangularization condition on the coefficient matrix, which produces nonadiabatic passages that deliver exact solutions to the Schrödinger equation and restore probability conservation automatically. A sympathetic reader would care because the method scales beyond few-excitation limits and discrete-variable cases, as shown by perfect and nonreciprocal transfers in a cavity magnonic system derived from the full Lindblad master equation.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the upper triangularization condition of the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian's coefficient matrix in the stationary ancillary frame yields nonadiabatic passages in both bra and ket spaces and supplies exact solutions of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. At the end of these passages, probability conservation of the wave function is automatically restored without normalization. This enables perfect state transfer for arbitrary initial states, and the transfer holds independently of the parity-time symmetry of the coefficient matrix and the exceptional points of the eigenspectrum. The approach is illustrated with nonreciprocal transfer consistent with coherentperfect

What carries the argument

Upper triangularization condition of the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian's coefficient matrix in the stationary ancillary frame, which generates nonadiabatic passages and exact solutions for the dynamics.

If this is right

  • Perfect state transfer is achieved for arbitrary initial states.
  • The transfer result does not depend on parity-time symmetry of the coefficient matrix.
  • The transfer does not depend on exceptional points of the eigenspectrum.
  • Nonreciprocal transfer is consistent with coherent perfect absorption.
  • The control applies to any number of bosonic modes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could be tested by deriving similar controls for time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonians in photonic or superconducting bosonic systems.
  • Automatic probability restoration might simplify simulations of open-system dynamics when full quantum-jump terms are kept.
  • The independence from exceptional points suggests the method can operate in regimes where spectrum singularities are absent or avoided.

Load-bearing premise

The coefficient matrix of the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian can be upper triangularized in a suitable stationary ancillary frame.

What would settle it

A numerical simulation or analytic counterexample in which perfect state transfer fails for some arbitrary initial state even when the upper triangularization condition is met.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.04495 by Jun Jing, Zhu-yao Jin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Sketch of an open cavity magnonic system under con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Fidelity dynamics during the Fock-state trans [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Fidelity dynamics during the Fock-state transfer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Fidelity dynamics about the individual states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Current studies about the continuous-variable systems in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics heavily revolved around the singularities in the eigenspectrum by mimicking their discrete-variable counterparts. Discussions over the nonunitary features in time evolution are growing and yet limited in scalability and controllability. We develop here a general theory to control an arbitrary number of bosonic modes under time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. Far beyond the subspace of few excitations, our control theory operates in the Heisenberg picture and exploits the gauge potential underlying the instantaneous frames rather than the eigenspectrum. In particular, instantaneous frames are defined by time-dependent ancillary operators as linear combinations of the laboratory-frame operators, while the gauge potential arises from the unitary transformation between the time-dependent and stationary ancillary frames. We find that upper triangularization condition of the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian's coefficient matrix in the stationary ancillary frame yields two nonadiabatic passages in both bra and ket spaces and also the exact solutions of the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation. At the end of these passages, probability conservation of wave function is automatically restored without brute-force normalization. Our theory is exemplified by perfect and nonreciprocal state transfers in a cavity magnonic system under non-Hermitian Hamiltonian rigorously derived from the Lindblad master equation with all quantum-jump terms retained. Under certain conditions, perfect state transfer holds for arbitrary initial states and is irrelevant to both parity-time symmetry of coefficient matrix and exceptional points of eigenspectrum. The nonreciprocal transfer is consistent with coherent perfect absorption, providing a first-principles route to coherent control of non-Hermitian continuous-variable systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a general theory for controlling an arbitrary number of bosonic modes under time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Working in the Heisenberg picture, it defines instantaneous frames via time-dependent ancillary operators (linear combinations of laboratory-frame operators) and introduces a gauge potential from the unitary transformation to a stationary ancillary frame. The central result is that an upper triangularization condition on the non-Hermitian coefficient matrix in the stationary frame produces nonadiabatic passages in both bra and ket spaces, yielding exact solutions to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation with automatic restoration of probability conservation at the end of the protocol. This is exemplified by perfect and nonreciprocal state transfers in a cavity magnonic system whose non-Hermitian Hamiltonian is rigorously derived from the Lindblad master equation retaining all quantum-jump terms. The authors claim that, under certain conditions, perfect state transfer holds for arbitrary initial states and is independent of PT symmetry of the coefficient matrix and exceptional points of the eigenspectrum.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work provides a scalable, first-principles route to coherent control of non-Hermitian continuous-variable systems that operates beyond few-excitation subspaces and does not rely on PT symmetry or exceptional-point engineering. The automatic norm restoration and the explicit derivation from the Lindblad equation (rather than an ad-hoc non-Hermitian Hamiltonian) are notable strengths that could enable new protocols for perfect state transfer and coherent perfect absorption in open bosonic systems.

major comments (1)
  1. The upper triangularization condition on the coefficient matrix in the stationary ancillary frame is asserted to produce exact, norm-preserving solutions for arbitrary initial states in infinite-dimensional bosonic Fock space. However, the construction does not visibly demonstrate that the resulting linear map on operators preserves the canonical commutation relations [a_i, a_j†] = δ_ij across all modes when acting on non-Gaussian states, nor that the gauge potential from the frame change cancels all non-unitary contributions without additional assumptions on the spectrum. This step is load-bearing for the claim of perfect state transfer for arbitrary initial states (see the general theory section and the cavity-magnonic example).
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the ancillary operators and the gauge potential could be clarified with an explicit definition of the unitary transformation between frames early in the general-theory section.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a brief discussion of how the method scales computationally when the number of bosonic modes increases, even if only for Gaussian states.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, accurate summary, and for identifying the central technical step whose clarity is essential to the claims. We address the major comment directly below, providing the missing explicit links between the upper-triangularization condition, preservation of the canonical commutation relations, and cancellation of non-unitary contributions. We agree that these links should be made more visible and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The upper triangularization condition on the coefficient matrix in the stationary ancillary frame is asserted to produce exact, norm-preserving solutions for arbitrary initial states in infinite-dimensional bosonic Fock space. However, the construction does not visibly demonstrate that the resulting linear map on operators preserves the canonical commutation relations [a_i, a_j†] = δ_ij across all modes when acting on non-Gaussian states, nor that the gauge potential from the frame change cancels all non-unitary contributions without additional assumptions on the spectrum. This step is load-bearing for the claim of perfect state transfer for arbitrary initial states (see the general theory section and the cavity-magnonic example).

    Authors: The ancillary operators are introduced as time-dependent linear combinations of the laboratory-frame operators that are required, by definition, to obey the CCR at every instant. The unitary map to the stationary ancillary frame therefore generates a gauge potential whose explicit form is substituted into the Heisenberg equations. Under the upper-triangularization condition the resulting system of ODEs for the operator coefficients becomes strictly triangular; its exact solution is a linear (Bogoliubov-type) transformation whose matrix satisfies the symplectic condition that automatically preserves [A_i, A_j†] = δ_ij for the entire set of modes. Because the map is linear and acts on the operators themselves, the same evolution holds for any initial state in the Fock space, Gaussian or non-Gaussian; no additional spectral assumptions (e.g., absence of exceptional points) enter the derivation. The non-unitary pieces are isolated by the triangular structure and cancel exactly at the protocol endpoint, restoring the norm without external normalization. This cancellation is shown algebraically in the general theory section and is verified numerically for arbitrary Fock states in the cavity-magnonic example. We will add an explicit appendix that recomputes the CCR after the triangular evolution and states the domain assumptions required for unbounded operators, thereby making the argument fully visible. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain is self-contained and externally grounded

full rationale

The paper derives the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian directly from the Lindblad master equation while retaining all quantum-jump terms, supplying independent external grounding rather than internal fitting. Instantaneous frames are defined via ancillary operators as linear combinations of laboratory-frame operators, with the gauge potential arising from the unitary frame transformation; the upper-triangularization condition is then shown to produce solvable nonadiabatic passages and exact solutions to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. This constitutes a constructive derivation, not a definitional equivalence or self-referential loop. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results appear in the derivation. The claim of perfect state transfer for arbitrary initial states follows as a consequence of the constructed passages rather than being presupposed by the inputs. The overall theory therefore remains non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The theory rests on defining time-dependent ancillary operators as linear combinations of laboratory-frame operators and assuming the upper triangularization condition produces exact solutions; no explicit free parameters or new entities are stated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The non-Hermitian Hamiltonian can be expressed in a form where its coefficient matrix admits upper triangularization in the stationary ancillary frame.
    Invoked to yield the nonadiabatic passages and exact solutions of the time-dependent Schrödinger equation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5585 in / 1279 out tokens · 35842 ms · 2026-05-17T02:12:55.134255+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (see appendix A for details). Generally, in the rotating frame with respect to V(t), we have Hrot(t) = V †(t)H(t)V(t) − iV †(t)dV(t) dt =⃗ µ† 0 [H µ (t) − A (t)]⃗ µT 0, (6) where the dynamical coefficient matrix H µ (t) is non- Hermitian, i.e., H µ (t) ̸= [H µ (t)]†. The Hermitian and purely geometric matrix A represents the gauge poten- tial [ 56] that is ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    are transformed as id dt |ψ (t)⟩rot =Hrot(t)|ψ (t)⟩rot, (7a) id dt |φ(t)⟩rot =H † rot(t)|φ(t)⟩rot, (7b) with the rotated pure states |ψ (t)⟩rot = V †(t)|ψ (t)⟩, |φ(t)⟩rot = V †(t)|φ(t)⟩. (8) The evolution operators for |ψ (t)⟩rot and |φ(t)⟩rot are Urot(t) = ˆTe − i ∫ t 0 Hrot(s)ds, V rot(t) = ˆTe − i ∫ t 0 H† rot(s)ds, (9) respectively, where ˆT is the ti...

    work page

  3. [3]

    yields the upper triangularized Hamiltonian: Hrot(t) = N∑ k=1 N∑ m≥ k [H µ km(t) − A km(t)]µ † k(0)µ m(0). (11) The dynamics of an arbitrary operator ˜OS can be ob- tained by OH (t) = V † rot(t) ˜OSUrot(t) according to the non- Hermitian Heisenberg equation [ 58] with the evolution operators given by Eq. ( 9). Under the Hamiltonian ( 11), the dynamics of ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The Hermitian conjugate of Eq

    can activate µ 1(t) and µ † N (t) as nonadiabatic passages in the Heisenberg picture. The Hermitian conjugate of Eq. (

    work page

  5. [5]

    # $%e"& $'($' )!

    takes the lower triangularization form of H † rot(t) = N∑ k=1 N∑ m≥ k [(H µ km(t))∗ − A km(t)]µ † m(0)µ k(0). (18) Similar to the ket-space case, the dynamics of the ancil- lary operators µ 1(0) and µ † N (0) can be obtained as µ 1(0) → e− if ∗ 1 (t)µ 1(t), µ † N (0) → eif ∗ N (t)µ † N (t) (19) by using the non-Hermitian Heisenberg equation and the Hamilt...

    work page

  6. [6]

    through the Lindblad master equation can be found in appendix B with ϕ a = 0, despite both ϕ a and Γ can have many choices [ 13, 40, 46]. In the rotating frame with respect to H0(t) = ω 0(t)(a†a +b†b), the full Hamiltonian ( 20) is transformed as H(t) = [ ∆( t) 2 − iγaeiϕ a ] a†a − [ ∆( t) 2 +iγb ] b†b + [ J(t)eiϕ +iΓ ] a†b + [ J(t)e− iϕ +iΓ ] b†a, (21) w...

    work page

  7. [7]

    and Eqs. ( 23–26) into the upper triangularization condition ( 10), we obtain the constraints for the coupling strength J(t) and the detuning ∆( t) as J(t) = [ ˙θ(t) + Γ cosα (t) cos 2θ(t) − (γa cosϕ a − γb) × sinθ(t) cosθ(t) ] / sin[ϕ +α (t)], ∆( t) = ˙α (t) − 2 [ J(t) cos(ϕ +α (t)) cot 2θ(t) + Γ sinα (t) sin 2θ(t) + γa sinϕ a 2 ] . (27) Under Eq. ( 27),...

    work page

  8. [8]

    captures the fact that the non-Hermitian component in the Hamiltonian ( 21) renders the probability nonconservation of the two-mode system during the time evolution. However, in our proto- col, the state-norm can be guaranteed to be unit at both beginning and end of the evolution, as long as we have a vanishing integral ∫ τ 0 ˙fi(t)dt =fi(τ) − fi(0) = 0. ...

    work page

  9. [9]

    In particular, the time evolution takes the form of Eq

    can activate the ancillary operator µ † 2(t) as the nonadiabatic passage. In particular, the time evolution takes the form of Eq. ( 19), where the global phase ˙f ∗ 2 (t) = i[γa exp(−iϕ a) +γb] − ˙f ∗ 1 (t) with ˙f ∗ 1 (t) the complex conjugate of ˙f1(t) given by Eqs. ( 29) and ( 30). Similar to µ † 1(t), a flexible and perfect state transfer can be implem...

    work page

  10. [10]

    These transfers are found to be irrelevant to the PT -symmetry of Hamiltonian and the presence or ab- sence of EPs

    to realize the perfect transfer of arbitrary initial states from the cavity mode to the magnon mode, includ- ing the Fock state, the binomial code state (a state of a logical qubit encoding for enhancing noise resilience) [ 67], the coherent state, the cat state, and even the thermal state. These transfers are found to be irrelevant to the PT -symmetry of...

    work page

  11. [11]

    (34) To ensure the vanishing of the time integral over ˙fi(t) in Eq

    is re- duced to be ˙fi(t) = iγa cos 2θ(t). (34) To ensure the vanishing of the time integral over ˙fi(t) in Eq. ( 34), one can choose the gain or loss rate and dissipative coupling strength as γa = λ π ˙θ(t), Γ = − λ 2 ˙θ(t), (35) givenθ(t) a linear function of time in Eq. ( 31). Here the positive factor λ scales the magnitudes of these rates or strength....

    work page

  12. [12]

    With θ(t) in Eq

    is plotted in (c) and (d) for avoid- ing and crossing EPs, respectively. With θ(t) in Eq. ( 31), the coherent coupling strength J(t) and the detuning ∆( t) are constrained by Eq. ( 27). ϕ a = π , ϕ = π/ 2, Γ = 0, and γa =γb, where γa satisfies Eq. ( 35) with λ =π in (a) and (c), and λ = 4π in (b) and (d). Then fi(τ) − fi(0) = 0 for both avoiding and crossi...

    work page

  13. [13]

    40τ) = 0

    073, F3, 2(0. 40τ) = 0 . 031, F2, 3(0. 62τ) = 0 . 032, and F1, 4(0. 82τ) = 0 . 074. The total fidelity ∑ n Fn ≡∑ n1,n 2 Fn1,n 2, being equivalent to the trace of the two- mode system Tr[ |ψ (t)⟩⟨ψ (t)|], can represent the prob- ability conservation or non-conservation under a non- Hermitian Hamiltonian. In both Figs. 2(a) and (b), it is found that ∑ n Fn(0...

    work page

  14. [14]

    is shown in (c) and (d) for avoid- ing and crossing EPs, respectively. ϕ a = 0. Both Γ and γa are given by Eq. ( 35) with λ = 0. 5 in (a) and (c), and λ = 1. 2 in (b) and (d). The other parameters are the same as Fig. 2. And fi(τ) − fi(0) = 0 for both avoiding and crossing EPs. the global phase in Eq. ( 30) becomes ˙fi(t) = −i(γa − Γ sin 2θ). (36) One can...

    work page

  15. [15]

    are still applicable to neu- tralize the imaginary phase under the parametric setting in Eq. (

    work page

  16. [16]

    In both Figs

    for θ(t). In both Figs. 3(a) and (b), it is found that the ini- tial population on |5⟩a|0⟩0 can be completely transferred to |0⟩a|5⟩b, even when the other five-excitation states could be temporally yet significantly populated during the passage. The Fock states with more excitations of the target (magnon) mode are sequently populated un- til F0, 5(τ) = 1 at...

    work page

  17. [17]

    61τ) = 0

    40, F1, 4(0. 61τ) = 0 . 55, and F0, 5(0. 90τ) = 1 . 07. And in Fig. 3(b) with EPs, we have F4, 1(0. 35τ) = 0 . 24, F3, 2(0. 50τ) = 0 . 32, F2, 3(0. 61τ) = 0 . 46, F1, 4(0. 72τ) =

    work page

  18. [18]

    89τ) = 1

    74, and F0, 5(0. 89τ) = 1 . 40. Under the conditions in Eq. ( 35), the state norm becomes unit at the end of the passage. Again the associated evolutions of the real and imaginary parts of the eigenenergies are presented in Figs. 3(c) and (d), respectively. As shown in Fig. 3(c), the eigenenergies do not coalesce during the whole pas- sage, confirming the ...

    work page

  19. [19]

    γ =γa or γb in our system

    can be divided as γ = γ0 +γ1, where γ0 and γ1 represent the intrinsic and external loss rates of the modes, respectively. γ =γa or γb in our system. Following the coupled-mode theory [ 68], the system dynamics can be described by the scattering matrix [ 40, 68–73]. It is defined as S(ω,t ) = I − iK † 1 ω − H a(t)K, (38) where K = √ 2γ1I and I is the two-di...

    work page

  20. [20]

    Here the second equiva- lence holds whenγ1 =γa/ 2

    becomes S(t =τ) ≈ ( 1 − 2γ 1 γ a 0 S21(τ) 1 − 2γ 1 γ a ) = ( 0 0 S21(τ) 0 ) , (41) whereS21(τ) ≈ 4γ1J(τ)/γ 2 a ̸= 0. Here the second equiva- lence holds whenγ1 =γa/ 2. Equation ( 41) indicates that for a nonvacuum initial state in the magnon mode b, the total system population can become almost zero at a de- sired moment, i.e., [ a(τ),b (τ)]T = S(t = τ)[0...

    work page

  21. [21]

    The initial state of system is |ψ (0)⟩ = |0⟩a|5⟩b. In Fig. 5, we demonstrate the fidelity dynamics of the relevant states |5⟩a|0⟩b and |0⟩a|5⟩b for various λ. It is found that although the state |5⟩a|0⟩ is slightly pop- ulated, the population on the state |0⟩a|5⟩b decreases monotonically with time, with a decay rate roughly pro- portional to λ fort ≤ 0. 3τ...

    work page

  22. [22]

    Pioneer” and “Leading Goose

    with λ = 0, the non- Hermitian Hamiltonian in Eq. ( 37) becomes a Hermitian 9 one [ 26], i.e., H(t) = iJ (t)a†b − iJ (t)b†a. Our results then encompass the bidirectional perfect state transfer in the Hermitian bosonic system as a special case. V. CONCLUSION In summary, we propose a systematic and versatile method for manipulating the general bosonic syste...

    work page

  23. [23]

    We emphasize that the quantum jump terms have been fully retained throughout the deriva- tion [ 4, 13] leading to Eq

    from the Lindblad mas- ter equation. We emphasize that the quantum jump terms have been fully retained throughout the deriva- tion [ 4, 13] leading to Eq. ( 20), in contrast to those ap- proaches only regarding the nonunitary evolution part after post-selection [ 47]. In general, the dynamics of an open cavity magnonic system that is coupled to the trav- ...

    work page

  24. [24]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non-hermitian hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998)

    work page 1998

  25. [25]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Adv. Phys. 69, 249 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    C. M. Bender and D. W. Hook, PT -symmetric quantum mechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 045002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Metelmann and A

    A. Metelmann and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Ramezani, H.-K

    H. Ramezani, H.-K. Li, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Unidirectional spectral singularities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 263905 (2014)

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Longhi, Non-reciprocal transmission in photonic lat- tices based on unidirectional coherent perfect absorption , Opt

    S. Longhi, Non-reciprocal transmission in photonic lat- tices based on unidirectional coherent perfect absorption , Opt. Lett. 40, 1278 (2015)

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    L. Jin, P. Wang, and Z. Song, Incident direction in- dependent wave propagation and unidirectional lasing, Sci. Rep. 6, 32919 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Ramezani, Y

    H. Ramezani, Y. Wang, E. Yablonovitch, and X. Zhang, Unidirectional perfect absorber, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 22, 115 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    Huang, Y

    Y. Huang, Y. Shen, C. Min, S. Fan, and G. Veronis, Uni- directional reflectionless light propagation at exception al points, Nanophotonics 6, 977 (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Jin and Z

    L. Jin and Z. Song, Incident direction indepen- dent wave propagation and unidirectional lasing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 073901 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Harder, Y

    M. Harder, Y. Yang, B. M. Yao, C. H. Yu, J. W. Rao, Y. S. Gui, R. L. Stamps, and C.-M. Hu, Level attraction due to dissipative magnon-photon coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 137203 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    V. L. Grigoryan, K. Shen, and K. Xia, Synchro- nized spin-photon coupling in a microwave cavity, Phys. Rev. B 98, 024406 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Y.-P. Wang, J. W. Rao, Y. Yang, P.-C. Xu, Y. S. Gui, B. M. Yao, J. Q. You, and C.-M. Hu, Nonreciproc- ity and unidirectional invisibility in cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 127202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    H. S. Xu and L. Jin, Robust incoherent perfect absorption, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, L022006 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A: Math. and Theor. 45, 444016 (2012)

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    D. C. Brody, Biorthogonal quantum mechanics, J. Phys. A:Math. Theor. 47, 035305 (2013)

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    Ib´ a˜ nez, S

    S. Ib´ a˜ nez, S. Mart ´ ınez-Garaot, X. Chen, E. Torrontegui, and J. G. Muga, Shortcuts to adiabaticity for non- hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. A 84, 023415 (2011)

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    B. T. Torosov, G. Della Valle, and S. Longhi, Non-hermitian shortcut to adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. A 87, 052502 (2013)

    work page 2013

  42. [42]

    B. T. Torosov, G. Della Valle, and S. Longhi, Non- hermitian shortcut to stimulated raman adiabatic pas- sage, Phys. Rev. A 89, 063412 (2014)

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    Jin and J

    Z.-y. Jin and J. Jing, Universal quan- tum control by non-hermitian hamiltonian, 11 Phys. Rev. A 112, 032605 (2025)

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Jin and J

    Z.-y. Jin and J. Jing, Universal per- spective on nonadiabatic quantum control, Phys. Rev. A 111, 012406 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Jin and J

    Z.-y. Jin and J. Jing, Entangling distant systems via universal nonadiabatic passage, Phys. Rev. A 111, 022628 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    Jin and J

    Z.-y. Jin and J. Jing, Universal quantum control with dy- namical correction, Phys. Rev. A 112, 022427 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Jin and J

    Z.-y. Jin and J. Jing, Preparing greenberger-horne- zeilinger states on ground levels of neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. A 112, 022602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Jin and J

    Z.-y. Jin and J. Jing, Universal quantum control over ma- jorana zero modes, Phys. Rev. A 112, 052614 (2025)

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Jin and J

    Z.-y. Jin and J. Jing, Universal quantum control over bosonic network, arXiv:2509.06560 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    A. Guo, G. J. Salamo, D. Duchesne, R. Moran- dotti, M. Volatier-Ravat, V. Aimez, G. A. Siviloglou, and D. N. Christodoulides, Observation of PT - symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 093902 (2009)

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    Regensburger, C

    A. Regensburger, C. Bersch, M.-A. Miri, G. Onishchukov, D. N. Christodoulides, and U. Peschel, Parity–time synthetic photonic lattices, Nature 488, 167 (2012)

    work page 2012

  52. [52]

    Ge and H

    L. Ge and H. E. T¨ ureci, Antisymmetric PT -photonic structures with balanced positive- and negative-index ma- terials, Phys. Rev. A 88, 053810 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    B. Peng, S. K. ¨Ozdemir, F. Lei, F. Monifi, M. Gianfreda, G. L. Long, S. Fan, F. Nori, C. M. Bender, and L. Yang, Parity–time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavitie s, Nat. Phys. 10, 394 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Hodaei, A

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Kha- javikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points, Nature 548, 187 (2017)

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    Zhang, Y

    F. Zhang, Y. Feng, X. Chen, L. Ge, and W. Wan, Synthetic anti-pt symmetry in a single microcavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 053901 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Bergman, R

    A. Bergman, R. Duggan, K. Sharma, M. Tur, A. Zadok, and A. Al` u, Observation of anti-parity-time-symmetry, phase transitions and exceptional points in an optical fi- bre, Nat. Commun. 12, 486 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    X. Zhu, H. Ramezani, C. Shi, J. Zhu, and X. Zhang, PT - symmetric acoustics, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031042 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    Fleury, D

    R. Fleury, D. Sounas, and A. Al` u, An invisi- ble acoustic sensor based on parity-time symmetry, Nat. Commun. 6, 5905 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [59]

    Christensen, M

    J. Christensen, M. Willatzen, V. R. Velasco, and M.-H. Lu, Parity-time synthetic phononic media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 207601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    T. Liu, X. Zhu, F. Chen, S. Liang, and J. Zhu, Unidirec- tional wave vector manipulation in two-dimensional space with an all passive acoustic parity-time-symmetric meta- materials crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 124502 (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    X. Wang, X. Fang, D. Mao, Y. Jing, and Y. Li, Ex- tremely asymmetrical acoustic metasurface mirror at the exceptional point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 214302 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    W. Tang, X. Jiang, K. Ding, Y.-X. Xiao, Z.-Q. Zhang, C. T. Chan, and G. Ma, Exceptional nexus with a hybrid topological invariant, Science 370, 1077 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    Zhang, X.-Q

    D. Zhang, X.-Q. Luo, Y.-P. Wang, T.-F. Li, and J. Q. You, Observation of the exceptional point in cav- ity magnon-polaritons, Nat. Commun. 8, 1368 (2017)

    work page 2017

  64. [64]

    Zhang, K

    X. Zhang, K. Ding, X. Zhou, J. Xu, and D. Jin, Experimental observation of an exceptional sur- face in synthetic dimensions with magnon polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 237202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    J. Zhao, Y. Liu, L. Wu, C.-K. Duan, Y.-x. Liu, and J. Du, Observation of anti- PT -symmetry phase tran- sition in the magnon-cavity-magnon coupled system, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 014053 (2020)

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    Y. Wang, W. Xiong, Z. Xu, G.-Q. Zhang, and J.-Q. You, Dissipation-induced nonreciprocal magnon blockade in a magnon-based hybrid system, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 260314 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    J. Qian, J. Li, S.-Y. Zhu, J. Q. You, and Y.-P. Wang, Probing pt-symmetry breaking of non-hermitian topolog- ical photonic states via strong photon-magnon coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 156901 (2024)

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Y. Yang, J. Yao, Y. Xiao, P.-T. Fong, H.-K. Lau, and C.-M. Hu, Anomalous long-distance coherence in critically driven cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 206902 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    Zhang, M

    C. Zhang, M. Kim, Y.-H. Zhang, Y.-P. Wang, D. Trivedi, A. Krasnok, J. Wang, D. Isleifson, R. Roshko, and C.-M. Hu, Gain–loss coupled systems, APL Quantum 2, 011501 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    P.-R. Han, W. Ning, X.-J. Huang, R.-H. Zheng, S.-B. Yang, F. Wu, Z.-B. Yang, Q.-P. Su, C.-P. Yang, and S.-B. Zheng, Measuring topological invariants for higher- order exceptional points in quantum three-mode systems, Nat. Commun. 15, 10293 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Y.-H. Chen, Y. Xia, Q.-C. Wu, B.-H. Huang, and J. Song, Method for constructing shortcuts to adia- baticity by a substitute of counterdiabatic driving terms, Phys. Rev. A 93, 052109 (2016)

    work page 2016

  72. [72]

    T. Z. Luan, H. Z. Shen, and X. X. Yi, Shortcuts to adi- abaticity with general two-level non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. A 105, 013714 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    Zhang, Q.-C

    F.-Y. Zhang, Q.-C. Wu, and C.-P. Yang, Non-hermitian shortcut to adiabaticity in floquet cavity electromagnon- ics, Phys. Rev. A 106, 012609 (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    A. J. Daley, J. M. Taylor, S. Diehl, M. Baranov, and P. Zoller, Atomic three-body loss as a dynamical three- body interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 040402 (2009)

    work page 2009

  75. [75]

    Uzdin, U

    R. Uzdin, U. G¨ unther, S. Rahav, and N. Moiseyev, Time-dependent hamiltonians with 100speed efficiency, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 415304 (2012)

    work page 2012

  76. [76]

    Ib´ a˜ nez and J

    S. Ib´ a˜ nez and J. G. Muga, Adiabaticity condition for non-hermitian hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. A 89, 033403 (2014)

    work page 2014

  77. [77]

    Ashida and M

    Y. Ashida and M. Ueda, Full-counting many-particle dy- namics: Nonlocal and chiral propagation of correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 185301 (2018)

    work page 2018

  78. [78]

    D´ ora and C

    B. D´ ora and C. P. Moca, Quantum quench in PT -symmetric luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 136802 (2020)

    work page 2020

  79. [79]

    Kolodrubetz, D

    M. Kolodrubetz, D. Sels, P. Mehta, and A. Polkovnikov, Geometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems, Phys. Rep. 697, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  80. [80]

    C.-Y. Ju, A. Miranowicz, Y.-N. Chen, G.-Y. Chen, and F. Nori, Emergent parallel transport and curva- ture in hermitian and non-hermitian quantum mechan- ics, Quantum 8, 1277 (2024)

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.