Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 84 references

Equivariant symmetry-aware head pose estimation for fetal MRI

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read E(3)-Pose claims that explicitly modeling rotation equivariance and left-right head symmetry by construction yields robust 6-DoF fetal head pose estimates from low-resolution clinical MRI navigator volumes, reporting 9.4 degrees mean rotati

desk verdict Solid equivariant pose estimation paper with a nice symmetry trick; the clinical evaluation rests on semi-automated labels that deserve scrutiny, but the method and ablations hold up. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.04890 v8 pith:ZMP755TE submitted 2025-12-04 cs.CV

Ramya Muthukrishnan , Borjan Gagoski , Aryn Lee , P. Ellen Grant , Elfar Adalsteinsson , Benjamin Billot , Polina Golland This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords fetalMRI6-DoFposeestimationE(3)-equivariantneuralnetworkspseudovectorparametrizationobjectsymmetrynavigatorvolumesadaptivesliceprescriptiondomaingeneralization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

E(3)-Pose is a method for estimating the 6-degree-of-freedom pose of the fetal head from the rapid, low-resolution, artifact-degraded MRI navigator volumes that could be inserted before every diagnostic slice. The paper's central claim is that explicitly building two physical symmetries into the network—rotation equivariance under the Euclidean group and the approximate left-right symmetry of the fetal head—makes pose estimation robust on clinical data, where landmark-, registration-, and CNN-based methods break down. On 1,210 navigator volumes, the method reports a mean rotation error of 9.4 degrees against 22.6 for the best baseline, and it retains accuracy when training data are switched between two research cohorts. A simulated slice-prescription study further shows the estimated poses would reduce coverage gaps and slice obliqueness relative to motion-blind prescription. Why this matters: it is the evaluation closest to the intended clinical use, adaptive prescription of diagnostic slices to compensate for inter-slice fetal motion.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the rotation parametrization h(R) = e_x ⊕ e_y ⊕ e_z, where e_x is the left-to-right anatomical direction encoded as a pseudovector (a vector that flips sign under reflection together with a determinant factor, making the entire output invariant under left-right reflection) and e_y, e_z are ordinary vectors orthogonal to it. Because h(R) is decomposed into irreducible tensor components, an E(3)-equivariant CNN can predict it while commuting with rotations and reflections by construction; at inference, SVD orthonormalizes the three predicted directions and a sign choice on e_x enforces a proper rotation. This single construction replaces both data-augmentation-based equi

What would settle it

Re-annotate the navigator volumes with independently measured poses—for instance, by manually placing anatomical landmarks directly in the 4–6 mm navigator volumes or by recording optically tracked head motion during scanning—and compare E(3)-Pose's rotations against those. If mean rotation error on the independent set substantially exceeds the reported 9.4°, the clinical-accuracy claim is inflated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

E(3)-Pose claims that the hard part of fetal pose estimation is not precision but ambiguity and domain shift. The network is built to be equivariant under rotations and reflections of the input volume, and its rotation output is a 9-dimensional parametrization of the anatomical frame: the left-right axis is represented as a pseudovector, the two orthogonal axes as ordinary vectors, so the whole parametrization is invariant under left-right reflection yet continuous over 3D rotations. Translation comes from the center of mass of a learned brain segmentation. Because the symmetry is in the parametrization rather than in augmentations or heuristics, the network does not have to choose among lef

Load-bearing premise

The most fragile load-bearing premise is the navigator ground truth: the 1,210 clinical poses were not measured independently but computed from MRI slice-prescription parameters via slice-to-volume registration and then manually corrected—if that pipeline shares the low-resolution, artifact, and symmetry-ambiguity failure modes E(3)-Pose is designed to fix, the reported clinical accuracy could be optimistic.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On the clinical navigator set (4–6 mm voxels, real spin-history artifacts), E(3)-Pose reports 9.4° mean rotation error and 3.8 mm translation error, versus 22.6° and 11.5 mm for the strongest baseline—supporting the intended 1-second adaptive-prescription loop.
  • Equivariance is doing the heavy lifting: replacing E(3) convolutions with standard convolutions raises navigator rotation error from 9.4° to 18.0° when trained on one research cohort, and from 13.9° to 80.2° when trained on the other.
  • The symmetry-aware parametrization matters most under ambiguity: dropping the pseudovector or dropping the third basis direction each increases navigator error to 10.9°–26.1°, with the largest gaps on subjects that show the strongest left-right ambiguity.
  • Training with a simulated spin-history artifact is necessary for the domain transfer: without it, navigator error rises to 16.2°–31.9° depending on training data.
  • In simulation, adaptive slice prescription with estimated poses yields significantly lower coverage gap, coverage irregularity, slice obliqueness, and slice offset than motion-blind prescription, suggesting fewer missed brain regions in diagnostic stacks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The pseudovector design should transfer directly to other nearly reflection-symmetric objects with scarce training data, such as adult brain, cardiac, or lung imaging; the paper gestures at this but provides no experiments.
  • Because the navigator ground truth in the paper is itself derived from slice-prescription parameters plus slice-to-volume registration, an independent measurement—optical tracking or manual landmarking on the navigator volumes themselves—would be the cleanest way to confirm that the reported 9.4° is not an artifact of annotation.
  • A production system could pair E(3)-Pose with an uncertainty or asymmetry detector and switch to the non-symmetric three-vector variant for lateralized pathology—an option the paper notes but does not implement.
  • The appendix's Wigner-D generalization suggests the same equivariant parametrization can absorb N-fold rotational symmetries, which would cover objects like bottles, screws, or cylindrical anatomy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes E(3)-Pose, a 6-DoF fetal-head pose estimator built on E(3)-equivariant convolutions and a symmetry-aware rotation parametrization in which the left-right anatomical direction is encoded as a pseudovector and the other two basis directions as vectors. Translation is estimated by center-of-mass of a U-Net brain segmentation, and rotation by a separate E(3)-CNN regressor. The main claims are: (i) the architecture enforces rotation equivariance and left-right reflection invariance 'by construction'; (ii) this inductive bias improves cross-domain generalization to low-resolution, artifact-degraded clinical navigator volumes; and (iii) E(3)-Pose achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on clinical fetal MRI, with mean rotation error 9.4° versus 22.6° for the best baseline RbR on the Navigators dataset. Evidence includes baseline comparisons (Table 1), ablations over equivariance, pseudovector parametrization, loss functions, and artifact augmentation (Table 2), a simulation study of adaptive slice prescription (Section 5.6), and subject-level analyses (Appendix I).

Significance. If the results hold, the paper makes a solid contribution to medical-image pose estimation: it cleanly combines an equivariant architecture with an object-symmetry-aware output parametrization, and it addresses a clinically relevant problem where data are scarce and test distributions differ strongly from training distributions. The theoretical argument in Eqs. (4)-(6) is sound, the ablations are informative, the simulation study is a reasonable proof-of-concept, and the authors provide code and publicly released dHCP annotations. The main significance risk is that the headline clinical SOTA claim rests on a small, single-site Navigators dataset whose ground-truth annotations are semi-automatically constructed, and whose independence from the failure modes the method targets is not established. The equivariance claim is also stated more strongly than the actual inference pipeline implements.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix E; Tables 1, 4-5] The Navigators ground-truth chain is the load-bearing premise for the headline result (9.4° vs 22.6°). Appendix E states that GT poses were computed as T_k = ~P_k P_k^{-1}, where P_k comes from optimization-based slice-to-volume registration and ~P_k from scanner prescription parameters, followed by manual correction. This is not an independent gold standard for the artifact-laden, low-resolution volumes that E(3)-Pose is designed to handle. The manuscript does not report inter-rater reliability, the number of volumes requiring correction, the nature of the corrections, or criteria for resolving ambiguity. Moreover, since T_k is derived from the slice following the navigator, label noise from motion in the ~1 s interval (Appendix A) is baked into the GT. Please quantify label uncertainty (e.g., by independent manual annotation of a subset, or by estimating motion noise from the time-seri
  2. [Section 4.3 / Appendix B] The abstract and Section 1 claim rotation equivariance 'by construction,' but the actual E(3)-Pose inference pipeline is not E(3)-equivariant as a whole. The input volume is cropped to 64^3 around the predicted mask, resampled, and scaled so the brain occupies 60% of the volume (Appendix B); these operations are computed from the data and are not group-equivariant. Thus the exact equivariance guarantee holds for the E(3)-CNN core, not for the full E(3)-Pose pipeline. Please state this limitation explicitly and, if the 'by construction' claim is to be retained, verify the full-pipeline equivariance error (e.g., by measuring rotation-error consistency under a controlled set of input rotations after cropping/resampling, beyond the sensitivity analysis in Fig. 15).
  3. [Section 5.1 / Appendix M] The claim of 'state-of-the-art accuracy on clinical MRI volumes' is supported by only 9 Navigators subjects, all recruited at the same institution and imaged on the same scanner, with GA 26-36 weeks. Appendix M acknowledges this. The subject-level tables show consistent improvements, but a 9-subject, single-site cohort is not sufficient to support broad clinical-translation claims. Please either add independent multi-site navigator data or, failing that, substantially temper the clinical SOTA and translation claims in the abstract and conclusion.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table 2 caption] Duplicate phrase: '* indicates statistical significance compared to E(3)-Pose at p <0.05 compared to E(3)-Pose (hierarchical permutation test ...)'. Remove the repeated wording.
  2. [Appendix E] The sentence 'Lastly, we manually corrected the poses in each navigator volume' is vague given that the previous sentence says algorithmic poses were used 'to assist with annotation.' Specify how many volumes were manually corrected and whether the correction was done once or by multiple raters.
  3. [Appendix B] The radial basis definition '8.433573sus(x+m-1)sus(1-m-x)' is cryptic; define the soft unit step and the origin of the constant. Also state kernel-size conventions for the equivariant convolutions.
  4. [Section 5.3 / Appendix H] The hierarchical permutation test for Navigators is mentioned twice but never described. Provide the test procedure (clustering unit, resampling scheme) in the appendix.
  5. [Section 5.6 / Appendix L] The simulation study is an indirect evaluation because navigator volumes are synthesized from Research-Fetal test volumes rather than acquired. Briefly restate in the main text that the simulation cannot capture real navigator-specific artifacts beyond the modeled spin-history and resolution effects.
  6. [Figure 5] The right panel is visually dense; the text says 'for three example subjects' but the figure caption does not identify which columns correspond to which subject or orientation. Add a clear legend.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation; equivariance and symmetry properties follow from representation theory and are tested by ablations, not fitted. Remaining concerns are evaluation validity (semi-automated Navigators labels) rather than circularity.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Equations (4) through (6) define the rotation estimator as an E(3)-equivariant map and construct a pseudovector/vector parametrization that is invariant under left-right reflection, while Eq. (7) is a training loss rather than a fitted prediction. The method is not trained on navigator labels; the Navigators results are an evaluation on semi-automatically annotated data. Appendix E states that the GT poses were obtained using optimization-based slice-to-volume registration [76], then 'manually corrected', so the evaluation labels are not independent measurements of the kind that would fully close the loop with the method's inputs. This is a measurement-validity limitation, not a reduction of the claimed predictions to the method's inputs. The paper also flags the limited scope of the Navigators dataset in Appendix M: 'our analysis is limited to 9 pregnant participants who were recruited at the same institution and imaged on the same scanner.' Self-citations to EquiTrack [4], NeSVoR [76], Fetal-Align [32], and related work are used as baselines or annotation tools, not as load-bearing justification for the equivariant construction. The ablations (standard CNN, no pseudovector, two-vector parametrization, loss variants, and no artifact augmentation) provide independent evidence that the design choices matter empirically, so the central claim is not forced by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical or latent entities are introduced; the pseudovector/vector output channels are standard irreducible representations. Free parameters are limited to unreported or hand-chosen hyperparameters and augmentation ranges.

free parameters (4)
  • beta (loss weight in Eq. 7)
    Weight on the vector loss terms in Eq. 7; value is not stated in the main text or appendices, so the training objective cannot be exactly reproduced.
  • Spin-history augmentation sigma range = 2.3-4.6 mm (E(3)-CNN); 1.5-2.3 mm (segmentation)
    Hand-chosen ranges for the Gaussian artifact model in Section 4.3/Appendix F; ablations show artifact augmentation is critical for Navigators.
  • Low-resolution augmentation range = 3-7.5 mm (E(3)-CNN); 3-8 mm (segmentation)
    Hand-chosen to mimic navigator voxel sizes; central to cross-domain generalization.
  • Crop margin / brain occupancy = 40% margin; brain ~60% of 64^3 crop
    Design choice in Section 4.3/Appendix B; interacts with the equivariance approximation.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math O(3) representation theory: irreducible tensor fields, parity, and equivariant kernel parametrization (Eq. 3)
    Invoked in Section 3 to construct the E(3)-CNN; accepted from prior literature [20,70].
  • domain assumption Fetal brain is approximately left-right symmetric at navigator resolution, so Gsymm={reflection} suffices
    Justifies the pseudovector parametrization in Eq. 5; authors flag the limitation in Discussion and Appendix M.
  • domain assumption Spin-history artifact is well modeled as multiplicative Gaussian shading along the previous slice plane (tilde f = f(1 - N((x-c)^T n; 0, sigma^2)))
    Core augmentation in Section 4.3; ablation shows removing it degrades Navigators performance.
  • domain assumption Navigators ground-truth poses can be derived from scanner slice parameters via slice-to-volume registration plus manual correction
    Appendix E; if biased, the reported clinical accuracy numbers are optimistic.
  • standard math SVD orthonormalization plus determinant sign choice recovers a valid rotation without distorting the learned basis
    Used in Section 4.2 following prior SVD-based rotation regression [44].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Equivariant symmetry-aware head pose estimation for fetal MRI." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZMP755TE

@misc{pith2026251204890,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Equivariant symmetry-aware head pose estimation for fetal MRI},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZMP755TE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.04890}
}
read the original abstract

We present E(3)-Pose, a novel fast pose estimation method that jointly and explicitly models rotation equivariance and object symmetry. Our work is motivated by the challenging problem of accounting for fetal head motion during a diagnostic MRI scan. We aim to enable automatic adaptive prescription of diagnostic 2D MRI slices with 6-DoF head pose estimation, supported by rapid low-resolution 3D MRI volumes acquired before each 2D slice. Existing pose estimation methods struggle to generalize to clinical volumes due to pose ambiguities induced by inherent anatomical symmetries, as well as low resolution, noise, and artifacts. In contrast, E(3)-Pose captures anatomical symmetries and rigid pose equivariance by construction, and yields robust estimates of the fetal head pose. Our experiments on publicly available and representative clinical fetal MRI datasets demonstrate the superior robustness and generalization of our method across domains. Crucially, E(3)-Pose achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on clinical MRI volumes, supporting future clinical translation. Our implementation is publicly available at github.com/MedicalVisionGroup/E3-Pose.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.04890 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. E(3)-Pose is a rotation-equivariant and symmetry-aware framework for 6-DoF pose estimation. Left: a rapid navigator volume is inserted between every two 2D diagnostic MRI slices. Our aim is to estimate the fetal head pose to adjust imaging plane prescription in real time. Right: To enable robust performance, the network architecture employs E(3)-equivariant convolutional filters to capture pose equivariance and pseu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of E(3)-Pose. We first train a CNN ψ to segment the object. We estimate translation based on the center-of-mass of the predicted mask and then crop the 3D volumes around this mask using a 40% margin. The cropped volumes are fed to an E(3)-CNN ϕ trained independently to regress the orthonormal basis of the object frame, parametrized as one pseudovector (red) and two vectors (blue and green). The output is la… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Example results for methods trained on Research-Fetal. Volumes are displayed before (row 1) and after (rows 2-6) alignment to the canonical object frame. The brain mask is also aligned to the GT (green outline) and predicted (red outline) frames. Navigator volumes include spin history artifacts (blue arrows) and low resolution/SNR, posing challenges for pose estimation. While baseline methods struggle (red Xs, rotat… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Clinical-Young results. Performance statistics are shown as a function of gestational age for all well-performing methods trained on Research-Fetal (top) and dHCP (bottom). between input and template intensity distributions, and Fetal￾Align remains highly sensitive to …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Simulation results. Left: Quantitative comparison of diagnostic slice stacks obtained using motion-blind prescription and E(3)-Pose. Mean ± standard deviation statistics are displayed. * indicates statistical significance (p <0.05, pairwise Wilcoxon). Right: Brain cove…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Example diagnostic 2D slices. Accurate radiological as￾sessment of developmental abnormalities necessitates slices aligned to the sagittal (left→right), coronal (posterior→anterior), and axial (inferior→superior) anatomical directions (rows 1-3). Inter-slice fetal moti…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Interleaved acquisition framework. To correct for fetal head motion, we aim to automatically adjust the imaging plane Pk of every 2D slice, using the current head pose Tk. We rapidly acquire a navigator volume fk before every slice in order to accurately estimate Tk fr…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Feedback loop system. Our implementation runs on a 3T Siemens scanner, connected to a server hosted on a GPU-enabled laptop. On the server (right), E(3)-Pose separately estimates the rotation Rk and translation tk of the fetal head pose Tk, based on the navigator volum…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Segmentation study. Our segmentation network (trained on Research-Fetal) predicts accurate brain masks on all datasets, including challenging, out-of-distribution navigator volumes (left). Rotation estimation with the E(3)-CNN remains robust to larger segmentation erro…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Example results comparing E(3)-Pose to EquiTrack, 3DPose-Net, and 6DRep, trained on Research-Fetal. See [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Example results for methods trained on dHCP. We omit FireANTs and Fetal-Align since these methods are not trained on dHCP. See [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Additional example results for methods trained on Research-Fetal. See [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Example results for ablations trained on Research-Fetal. See [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Sensitivity to intensity perturbations. We evaluate all well-performing methods trained on Research-Fetal on augmented test volumes in Research-Fetal. E(3)-Pose remains robust to pro￾gressively larger voxel sizes (left), even when simulating additional spin history ar…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Sensitivity to spatial perturbations. We evaluate all well-performing methods trained on Research-Fetal on rotated test volumes in Research-Fetal. E(3)-Pose demonstrates stable pose estimates across a wide range of input poses. algorithms, which become increasingly er…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Additional simulation results. Left: Coverage irregularity and slice offset (mm) of diagnostic slice stacks obtained using motion-blind prescription and E(3)-Pose. Mean ± standard deviation statistics are displayed. * indicates statistical significance (p<0.05, pairwi…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Made to move: A review of measure- ment strategies to characterize heterogeneity in normal fetal movement.Infant Behavior and Development, 75:101949,

    Kathy Ayala, Christina Huynh, Kristin V oegtline, and He- lena JV Rutherford. Made to move: A review of measure- ment strategies to characterize heterogeneity in normal fetal movement.Infant Behavior and Development, 75:101949,

  2. [2]

    Trends and challenges in robot manipulation.Science, 364(6446):eaat8414, 2019

    Aude Billard and Danica Kragic. Trends and challenges in robot manipulation.Science, 364(6446):eaat8414, 2019. 1

    2019

  3. [3]

    Greve, Oula Puonti, Axel Thielscher, Koen Van Leemput, Bruce Fischl, Adrian V

    Benjamin Billot, Douglas N. Greve, Oula Puonti, Axel Thielscher, Koen Van Leemput, Bruce Fischl, Adrian V . Dalca, and Juan Eugenio Iglesias. SynthSeg: segmentation of brain MRI scans of any contrast and resolution without retraining.Medical Image Analysis, 86:102789, 2023. 5

    2023

  4. [4]

    Ellen Grant, and Polina Golland

    Benjamin Billot, Neel Dey, Daniel Moyer, Malte Hoffmann, Esra Abaci Turk, Borjan Gagoski, P. Ellen Grant, and Polina Golland. SE(3)-equivariant and noise-invariant 3D rigid mo- tion tracking in brain MRI.IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 43(11):4029–4040, 2024. 1, 2, 5, 6, 4

    2024

  5. [5]

    M¨uller, and Daniel Schuh

    Srinath Bulusu, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. M¨uller, and Daniel Schuh. Equivariance and generalization in neural networks.EPJ Web of Conferences, 258:09001, 2022. 2, 7

    2022

  6. [6]

    Norma- tive linear and volumetric biometric measurements of fetal brain development in magnetic resonance imaging.Child’s Nervous System, 36:2997–3005, 2020

    Shulei Cai, Guofu Zhang, He Wang, and Jing Wang. Norma- tive linear and volumetric biometric measurements of fetal brain development in magnetic resonance imaging.Child’s Nervous System, 36:2997–3005, 2020. 1

    2020

  7. [7]

    Equivariant point network for 3D point cloud analysis

    Haiwei Chen, Shichen Liu, Weikai Chen, Hao Li, and Randall Hill. Equivariant point network for 3D point cloud analysis. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 14514–14523,

  8. [8]

    Probabilistic 3D multi-modal, multi-object tracking for au- tonomous driving

    Hsu-Kuang Chiu, Jie Li, Rares ¸Ambrus ¸, and Jeannette Bohg. Probabilistic 3D multi-modal, multi-object tracking for au- tonomous driving. In2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 14227–14233, 2021. 1

    2021

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (ELUs).arXiv: Learning, 2015

    Djork-Arn´e Clevert, Thomas Unterthiner, and Sepp Hochre- iter. Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (ELUs).arXiv: Learning, 2015. 3

    2015

  2. [10]

    Cohen and Max Welling

    Taco S. Cohen and Max Welling. Group equivariant con- volutional networks.Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., pages 2990–2999, 2016. 2

    2016

  3. [11]

    Cohen and Max Welling

    Taco S. Cohen and Max Welling. Steerable CNNs. InInt. Conf. Learn. Rep., 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Cohen, Mario Geiger, Jonas K¨ohler, and Max Welling

    Taco S. Cohen, Mario Geiger, Jonas K¨ohler, and Max Welling. Spherical CNNs. InInt. Conf. Learn. Rep., 2018. 2

    2018

  5. [13]

    Lever- aging SO(3)-steerable convolutions for pose-robust semantic segmentation in 3D medical data.Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging, 2:834–855, 2024

    Ivan Diaz, Mario Geiger, and Richard Iain McKinley. Lever- aging SO(3)-steerable convolutions for pose-robust semantic segmentation in 3D medical data.Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging, 2:834–855, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  6. [14]

    Ellen Grant, Polina Golland, and Elfar Adalsteinsson

    Sebastian Diaz, Benjamin Billot, Neel Dey, Molin Zhang, Esra Abaci Turk, P. Ellen Grant, Polina Golland, and Elfar Adalsteinsson. Robust fetal pose estimation across gestational ages via cross-population augmentation. InMedical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Interventio...

    2025

  7. [15]

    Automatic brain pose estimation in fetal MRI

    Razieh Faghihpirayesh, Davood Karimi, Deniz Erdogmus, and Ali Gholipour. Automatic brain pose estimation in fetal MRI. InMedical Imaging 2023: Image Processing, page 124640T. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 2023. 2, 5, 6, 7

    2023

  8. [16]

    Fischler and Robert C

    Martin A. Fischler and Robert C. Bolles. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography.Communications of the ACM, 24(6):381–395, 1981. 6

    1981

  9. [17]

    Borjan Gagoski, Patrick McDaniel, Andr ´e J. W. van der Kouwe, Himanshu Bhat, Lawrence L. Wald, Elfar Adalsteins- son, P. Ellen Grant, and M. Dylan Tisdall. HASTE imaging with EPI volumetric navigators for real-time fetal head mo- tion detection.Proc. Intl. Soc. Magn. Reson. M...

    2016

  10. [18]

    A feature transfer enabled multi-task deep learning model on medical imaging.Expert Systems with Applications, 143: 112957, 2020

    Fei Gao, Hyunsoo Yoon, Teresa Wu, and Xianghua Chu. A feature transfer enabled multi-task deep learning model on medical imaging.Expert Systems with Applications, 143: 112957, 2020. 3

    2020

  11. [19]

    6D object pose regression via supervised learning on point clouds

    Ge Gao, Mikko Lauri, Yulong Wang, Xiaolin Hu, Jianwei Zhang, and Simone Frintrop. 6D object pose regression via supervised learning on point clouds. In2020 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 3643–3649, 2020. 1

    2020

  12. [20]

    e3nn: Euclidean neural net- works, 2022

    Mario Geiger and Tess Smidt. e3nn: Euclidean neural net- works, 2022. 2, 3, 4, 11

    2022

  13. [21]

    Ren´e Geist, Jonas Frey, Mikel Zhobro, Anna Levina, and Georg Martius

    A. Ren´e Geist, Jonas Frey, Mikel Zhobro, Anna Levina, and Georg Martius. Learning with 3D rotations: a hitchhiker’s guide to SO(3). InProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning. JMLR.org, 2024. 2

    2024

  14. [22]

    Estroff, Carol E

    Ali Gholipour, Judith A. Estroff, Carol E. Barnewolt, Richard L. Robertson, P. Ellen Grant, Borjan Gagoski, Si- mon K. Warfield, Onur Afacan, Susan A. Connolly, Jeffrey J. Neil, Adam Wolfberg, and Robert V . Mulkern. Fetal MRI: a technical update with educational aspirations, 2014. 1

    2014

  15. [23]

    Orit A. Glenn. MR imaging of the fetal brain.Pediatr Radiol, 40:68–81, 2009. 1

    2009

  16. [24]

    Registration by regression (RbR): a framework for interpretable and flexible atlas regis- tration.Biomed

    Karthik Gopinath, Xiaoling Hu, Malte Hoffmann, Oula Puonti, and Juan Eugenio Iglesias. Registration by regression (RbR): a framework for interpretable and flexible atlas regis- tration.Biomed. Image Regist. Proc., 90:205–215, 2025. 2, 6, 5, 7

    2025

  17. [25]

    Sebastin Grassia

    F. Sebastin Grassia. Practical parameterization of rotations using the exponential map.J. Graph. Tools, 3(3):29–48, 1998. 2

    1998

  18. [26]

    Greve and Bruce Fischl

    Douglas N. Greve and Bruce Fischl. Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration.NeuroIm- age, 48(1):63–72, 2009. 5

    2009

  19. [27]

    K. M. G´orski, E. Hivon, A. J. Banday, B. D. Wandelt, F. K. Hansen, M. Reinecke, and M. Bartelmann. HEALPix: a framework for high-resolution discretization and fast analysis of data distributed on the sphere.The Astrophysical Journal, 622(2):759, 2005. 11

    2005

  20. [28]

    Vector products and pseudovectors.Am

    Walter Hauser. Vector products and pseudovectors.Am. J. Phys., 54:168–172, 1986. 2, 3

    1986

  21. [29]

    Aaron T. Hess, M. Dylan Tisdall, Ovidiu C. Andronesi, Ernesta M. Meintjes, and Andr´e J. W. van der Kouwe. Real- time motion and B0 corrected single voxel spectroscopy using 9 volumetric navigators.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 66 (2):314–323, 2011. 1

    2011

  22. [30]

    Derek L. G. Hill, Philipp G. Batchelor, Mark Holden, and David J. Hawkes. Medical image registration.Phys. Med. Biol., 46(3), 2001. 2

    2001

  23. [31]

    EPOS: Estimat- ing 6D pose of objects with symmetries.IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020

    Tom´aˇs Hodaˇn, D´aniel Bar´ath, and Jiˇr´ı Matas. EPOS: Estimat- ing 6D pose of objects with symmetries.IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020. 3, 5

    2020

  24. [32]

    Dylan Tisdall, Martin Reuter, Elfar Adalsteinsson, P

    Malte Hoffmann, Esra Abaci Turk, Borjan Gagoski, Leah Morgan, Paul Wighton, M. Dylan Tisdall, Martin Reuter, Elfar Adalsteinsson, P. Ellen Grant, Lawrence L. Wald, and Andr´e J W van der Kouwe. Rapid head-pose detection for automated slice prescription of fetal-brain MRI.Int. ...

    2021

  25. [33]

    Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions.Journal of the Optical Society, 4: 629–642, 1987

    Berthold Horn. Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions.Journal of the Optical Society, 4: 629–642, 1987. 6

    1987

  26. [34]

    Equivariant single view pose prediction via induced and restriction representations

    Owen Howell, David Klee, Ondrej Biza, Linfeng Zhao, and Robin Walters. Equivariant single view pose prediction via induced and restriction representations. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 47251–47263. Curran Associates, Inc., 2023. 2

    2023

  27. [35]

    FireANTs: Adaptive riemannian optimization for multi-scale diffeomor- phic registration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01249, 2024

    Rohit Jena, Pratik Chaudhari, and James C Gee. FireANTs: Adaptive riemannian optimization for multi-scale diffeomor- phic registration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01249, 2024. 5, 6, 4

    2024

  28. [36]

    Karolis, Lucilio Cordero-Grande, Anthony N

    Vyacheslav R. Karolis, Lucilio Cordero-Grande, Anthony N. Price, Emer Hughes, Sean P. Fitzgibbon, Vanessa Kyri- akopoulou, Alena Uus, Nicholas Harper, Denis Prokopenko, Devi Bridglal, Jucha Willers Moore, Sian Wilson, Max- imilian Pietsch, Daan Christiaens, Maria Deprez, Lo- g...

    2025

  29. [37]

    Kingma and Jimmy Ba

    Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. InInt. Conf. Learn. Rep., 2015. 3

    2015

  30. [38]

    Image to sphere: learning equivariant features for efficient pose prediction

    David M Klee, Ondrej Biza, Robert Platt, and Robin Walters. Image to sphere: learning equivariant features for efficient pose prediction. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. 8

    2023

  31. [39]

    Rutherford, Joseph V

    Maria Kuklisova-Murgasova, Gerardine Quaghebeur, Mary A. Rutherford, Joseph V . Hajnal, and Julia A. Schnabel. Re- construction of fetal brain MRI with intensity matching and complete outlier removal.Medical Image Analysis, 16(8): 1550–1564, 2012. 5, 10

    2012

  32. [40]

    Implicit bias of linear equivariant networks

    Hannah Lawrence, Kristian Georgiev, Andrew Dienes, and Bobak T Kiani. Implicit bias of linear equivariant networks. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn, 2022. 2, 7

    2022

  33. [41]

    Dis- tributed orientation estimation in SO(d) and applications to formation control and network localization.IEEE Transac- tions on Control of Network Systems, 6(4):1302–1312, 2019

    Byung-Hun Lee, Sung-Mo Kang, and Hyo-Sung Ahn. Dis- tributed orientation estimation in SO(d) and applications to formation control and network localization.IEEE Transac- tions on Control of Network Systems, 6(4):1302–1312, 2019. 3

    2019

  34. [42]

    3D equivariant pose regression via direct wigner-D harmonics prediction

    Jongmin Lee and Minsu Cho. 3D equivariant pose regression via direct wigner-D harmonics prediction. InAdvances in Neu- ral Information Processing Systems, pages 127765–127798. Curran Associates, Inc., 2024. 2, 11

    2024

  35. [43]

    Self-supervised equivariant learning for oriented keypoint detection

    Jongmin Lee, Byungjin Kim, and Minsu Cho. Self-supervised equivariant learning for oriented keypoint detection. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 4847–4857, 2022. 2

    2022

  36. [44]

    An analysis of SVD for deep rotation estimation

    Jake Levinson, Carlos Esteves, Kefan Chen, Noah Snavely, Afshin Rostamizadeh Angjoo Kanazawa, and Ameesh Maka- dia. An analysis of SVD for deep rotation estimation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34, 2020. To appear in. 4, 5

    2020

  37. [45]

    Abbott, Shuran Song, and He Wang

    Xiaolong Li, Yijia Weng, Li Yi, Leonidas J Guibas, A. Abbott, Shuran Song, and He Wang. Leveraging SE(3) equivariance for self-supervised category-level object pose estimation from point clouds. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 15370–15381. Curran Ass...

    2021

  38. [46]

    Fetal onset of general movements.Pediatric Research, 63(2):191–195, 2008

    Annemarie B L ¨uchinger, Mijna Hadders-Algra, Colette M van Kan, and Johanna I P de Vries. Fetal onset of general movements.Pediatric Research, 63(2):191–195, 2008. 4

    2008

  39. [47]

    Malamateniou, S.J

    C. Malamateniou, S.J. Malik, S.J. Counsell, J.M. Allsop, A.K. McGuinness, T. Hayat, K. Broadhouse, R.G. Nunes, A.M. Ederies, J.V . Hajnal, and M.A. Rutherford. Motion- compensation techniques in neonatal and fetal MR imaging. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 34(6):1124–1136...

    2013

  40. [48]

    Robust wide- baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions.Im- age and Vision Computing, 22(10):761–767, 2004

    J Matas, O Chum, M Urban, and T Pajdla. Robust wide- baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions.Im- age and Vision Computing, 22(10):761–767, 2004. British Machine Vision Computing 2002. 6

    2004

  41. [49]

    Miller, Andreas J

    Karla L. Miller, Andreas J. Bartsch, and Stephen M. Smith. Si- multaneous multi-slice imaging for resting-state fMRI.Mag- netom Flash, 63(3):389–399, 2015. 5

    2015

  42. [50]

    V-Net: fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation

    Fausto Milletari, Nassir Navab, and Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi. V-Net: fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. InFourth Int. Conf. 3D Vision, pages 565–571, 2016. 3

    2016

  43. [51]

    Ellen Grant, William M

    Daniel Moyer, Esra Abaci Turk, P. Ellen Grant, William M. Wells, and Polina Golland. Equivariant filters for efficient tracking in 3D imaging. InMedical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2021, pages 193– 202, Cham, 2021. Springer International Publish...

    2021

  44. [52]

    Leveraging equivariant features for absolute pose regression

    Mohamed Adel Musallam, Vincent Gaudilli`ere, Miguel Or- tiz del Castillo, Kassem Al Ismaeil, and Djamila Aouada. Leveraging equivariant features for absolute pose regression. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 6876–6886,

  45. [53]

    Ramya Muthukrishnan, Paul Wighton, Robert Frost, Andr´e J. W. van der Kouwe, Aryn P. Lee, Elfar Adalsteinsson, P. Ellen Grant, Polina Golland, and Borjan Gagoski. Towards real-time navigation in diagnostic fetal brain MRI.Proc. Intl. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med., 2026. 1

    2026

  46. [54]

    On object symmetries and 6D pose estima- tion from images.CoRR, abs/1908.07640, 2019

    Giorgia Pitteri, Micha¨el Ramamonjisoa, Slobodan Ilic, and Vincent Lepetit. On object symmetries and 6D pose estima- tion from images.CoRR, abs/1908.07640, 2019. 3, 5 10

    1908 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Fernando P ´erez-Garc´ıa, Rachel Sparks, and S ´ebastien Ourselin. TorchIO: a python library for efficient loading, preprocessing, augmentation and patch-based sampling of medical images in deep learning.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 208:106236, 2021. 5, 3

    2021

  48. [56]

    Estimating SE(3) elements using a dual quaternion based linear kalman filter

    Arun Srivatsan Rangaprasad, Gillian Rosen, Drqaid Hadi, and Howie Choset. Estimating SE(3) elements using a dual quaternion based linear kalman filter. InRobotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2016. 8

    2016

  49. [57]

    Handling object symme- tries in CNN-based pose estimation

    Jesse Richter-Klug and Udo Frese. Handling object symme- tries in CNN-based pose estimation. In2021 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 13850–13856, 2021. 3

    2021

  50. [58]

    Glenn, Bistra Iordanova, Clau- dia Rodriguez-Carranza, Daniel B

    Francois Rousseau, Orit A. Glenn, Bistra Iordanova, Clau- dia Rodriguez-Carranza, Daniel B. Vigneron, James A. Barkovich, and Colin Studholme. Registration-based ap- proach for reconstruction of high-resolution in utero fetal MR brain images.Academic Radiology, 13(9):1072–1081...

    2006

  51. [59]

    Salehi, Shadab Khan, Deniz Erdogmus, and Ali Gholipour

    Seyed S.M. Salehi, Shadab Khan, Deniz Erdogmus, and Ali Gholipour. Real-time deep pose estimation with geodesic loss for image-to-template rigid registration.IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 38(2):470–481, 2019. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7

    2019

  52. [60]

    Improved generalization bounds of group invariant / equivari- ant deep networks via quotient feature spaces

    Akiyoshi Sannai, Masaaki Imaizumi, and Makoto Kawano. Improved generalization bounds of group invariant / equivari- ant deep networks via quotient feature spaces. InConference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2019. 2, 7

    2019

  53. [61]

    Ashutosh Saxena, Justin Driemeyer, and Andrew Y . Ng. Learning 3-D object orientation from images. InProceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, page 4266–4272. IEEE Press, 2009. 3, 4

    2009

  54. [62]

    Animating rotation with quaternion curves

    Ken Shoemake. Animating rotation with quaternion curves. InProceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, page 245–254, New York, NY , USA, 1985. Association for Computing Machinery. 10

    1985

  55. [63]

    Rutherford, Joseph V

    Sara Neves Silva, Sarah McElroy, Jordina Aviles Verdera, Kathleen Colford, Kamilah St Clair, Raphael Tomi-Tricot, Alena Uus, Val´ery Ozenne, Megan Hall, Lisa Story, Kuberan Pushparajah, Mary A. Rutherford, Joseph V . Hajnal, and Jana Hutter. Fully automated planning for anatom...

    2024

  56. [64]

    Smidt, Steven Kearnes, Lusann Yang, Li Li, Kai Kohlhoff, and Patrick Riley

    Nathaniel Thomas, Tess E. Smidt, Steven Kearnes, Lusann Yang, Li Li, Kai Kohlhoff, and Patrick Riley. Tensor field net- works: Rotation- and translation-equivariant neural networks for 3D point clouds.CoRR, abs/1802.08219, 2018. 2

    2018 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Dylan Tisdall, Aaron T

    M. Dylan Tisdall, Aaron T. Hess, Martin Reuter, Ernesta M. Meintjes, Bruce Fischl, and Andr ´e J. W. van der Kouwe. V olumetric navigators for prospective motion correction and selective reacquisition in neuroanatomical MRI.Magn. Reson. Med., 68(2):389–399, 2012. 1

    2012

  58. [66]

    Wang, Evan M

    Alan Q. Wang, Evan M. Yu, Adrian V . Dalca, and Mert R. Sabuncu. A robust and interpretable deep learning framework for multi-modal registration via keypoints.Medical Image Analysis, 90:102962, 2023. 2

    2023

  59. [67]

    SpaER: learning spatio-temporal equivariant rep- resentations for fetal brain motion tracking

    Jian Wang, Razieh Faghihpirayesh, Polina Golland, and Ali Gholipour. SpaER: learning spatio-temporal equivariant rep- resentations for fetal brain motion tracking. InPerinatal, Preterm and Paediatric Image Analysis, pages 3–13, Cham,

  60. [68]

    Approximately equivariant networks for imperfectly symmetric dynamics

    Rui Wang, Rose Yu, and Robin Walters. Approximately equivariant networks for imperfectly symmetric dynamics. In Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2022. 2, 11

    2022

  61. [69]

    General E(2)-Equivariant Steerable CNNs

    Maurice Weiler and Gabriele Cesa. General E(2)-Equivariant Steerable CNNs. InConference on Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems (NeurIPS), 2019. 2

    2019

  62. [70]

    3D steerable CNNs: learning rotationally equivariant features in volumetric data.Proc

    Maurice Weiler, Mario Geiger, Max Welling, Wouter Boomsma, and Taco Cohen. 3D steerable CNNs: learning rotationally equivariant features in volumetric data.Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Systems, 31, 2018. 2, 3, 4, 11

    2018

  63. [71]

    PROMO: real-time prospective motion correction in MRI using image-based tracking.Magn

    Nathan White, Cooper Roddey, Ajit Shankaranarayanan, Eric Han, Dan Rettmann, Juan Santos, Josh Kuperman, and An- ders Dale. PROMO: real-time prospective motion correction in MRI using image-based tracking.Magn. Reson. Med., 61 (3):91–105, 2010. 1

    2010

  64. [72]

    Polimeni, Bruce Fischl, Satrajit Ghosh, and Andr´e J

    Paul Wighton, Oliver Hinds, Robert Frost, Malte Hoffmann, Borjan Gagoski, Divya Varadarajan, Sebastien Proulx, Martin Reuter, Jonathan R. Polimeni, Bruce Fischl, Satrajit Ghosh, and Andr´e J. W. van der Kouwe. MR software tools for real- time decision making and FOV prescripti...

    2024

  65. [73]

    Worrall, Stephan J

    Daniel E. Worrall, Stephan J. Garbin, Daniyar Turmukham- betov, and Gabriel J. Brostow. Harmonic networks: deep translation and rotation equivariance. InIEEE Conf. Comp. Vis. and Pat. Recog., pages 7168–7177, 2017. 2

    2017

  66. [74]

    PoseCNN: a convolutional neural network for 6D object pose estimation in cluttered scenes.Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2018

    Yu Xiang, Tanner Schmidt, Venkatraman Narayanan, and Dieter Fox. PoseCNN: a convolutional neural network for 6D object pose estimation in cluttered scenes.Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2018. 1, 3, 4

    2018

  67. [75]

    SVoRT: iterative transformer for slice-to-volume registration in fetal brain MRI

    Junshen Xu, Daniel Moyer, P Ellen Grant, Polina Golland, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, and Elfar Adalsteinsson. SVoRT: iterative transformer for slice-to-volume registration in fetal brain MRI. InInternational Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, ...

    2022

  68. [76]

    Ellen Grant, Polina Golland, and Elfar Adalsteins- son

    Junshen Xu, Daniel Moyer, Borjan Gagoski, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, P. Ellen Grant, Polina Golland, and Elfar Adalsteins- son. NeSVoR: implicit neural representation for slice-to- volume reconstruction in MRI.IEEE Transactions on Medi- cal Imaging, 42(6):1707–1719, 2023. 1, 3

    2023

  69. [77]

    Image-guided procedures: a review.Computer Aided Interventions and Medical Robotics, 3(1-63):7, 2006

    Ziv Yaniv and Kevin Cleary. Image-guided procedures: a review.Computer Aided Interventions and Medical Robotics, 3(1-63):7, 2006. 1

    2006

  70. [78]

    Dinov, Junning Li, Zhonghe Zhang, Sam Hobel, Yonggang Shi, Xiangtao Lin, Alen Zamanyan, Lei Feng, Gaojun Teng, Fang Fang, Yuchun Tang, Fengchao Zang, Arthur W

    Jinfeng Zhan, Ivo D. Dinov, Junning Li, Zhonghe Zhang, Sam Hobel, Yonggang Shi, Xiangtao Lin, Alen Zamanyan, Lei Feng, Gaojun Teng, Fang Fang, Yuchun Tang, Fengchao Zang, Arthur W. Toga, and Shuwei Liu. Spatial–temporal atlas of human fetal brain development during the early s...

    2013

  71. [79]

    Rotation equivariant orientation estimation for omni- directional localization

    Chao Zhang, Ignas Budvytis, Stephan Liwicki, and Roberto Cipolla. Rotation equivariant orientation estimation for omni- directional localization. InProceedings of the Asian Confer- ence on Computer Vision (ACCV), 2020. 2

    2020

  72. [80]

    Learning 11 symmetry-aware geometry correspondences for 6D object pose estimation

    Heng Zhao, Shenxing Wei, Dahu Shi, Wenming Tan, Zheyang Li, Ye Ren, Xing Wei, Yi Yang, and Shiliang Pu. Learning 11 symmetry-aware geometry correspondences for 6D object pose estimation. In2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 13999–14008, 2023. 3, 5

    2023

  73. [81]

    On the continuity of rotation representations in neural networks

    Yi Zhou, Connelly Barnes, Jingwan Lu, Jimei Yang, and Hao Li. On the continuity of rotation representations in neural networks. In2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 5738–5746, 2019. 2

    2019

  74. [82]

    Zou, Simon K

    Kelly H. Zou, Simon K. Warfield, Aditya Bharatha, Clare M.C. Tempany, Michael R. Kaus, Steven J. Haker, William M. Wells, Ferenc A. Jolesz, and Ron Kikinis. Sta- tistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index1: scientific reports.Academic Ra...

    2004

  75. [83]

    denoiser

    ˚Ake Bj¨orck. Solving linear least squares problems by Gram- Schmidt orthogonalization.BIT Numerical Mathematics, 7: 1–21, 1967. 5 12 Equivariant Symmetry-Aware Head Pose Estimation for Fetal MRI Supplementary Material Sagittal (𝐿𝐿 → 𝑅𝑅) Coronal (𝑃𝑃 → 𝐴𝐴) Axial (𝐼𝐼 → 𝑆𝑆) Obliq...

    1967

  76. [2025]

    Springer Nature Switzerland. 1

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.