pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.06131 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Simultaneous measurement of thermal conductivity and specific heat in quasi-two-dimensional membranes using the 3{ω} method

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 00:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords 3ω methodthermal conductivityspecific heatsilicon nitridesuspended membranesthermal impedancequasi-two-dimensionalheat capacity
0
0 comments X

The pith

The 3ω method extracts both thermal conductivity and specific heat of suspended membranes from frequency-dependent impedance data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates simultaneous measurement of thermal conductivity and specific heat in quasi-two-dimensional suspended membranes. A metal heater line on silicon nitride membranes delivers heat and senses the complex thermal impedance Z(2ω) across a wide frequency range. An expression for this impedance is derived from a one-dimensional model that includes conduction along the heater and residual gas losses. Fitting the model to measured data yields values for both properties that match literature results for silicon nitride, supporting extension to atomically thin materials.

Core claim

By applying the 3ω technique to quasi-two-dimensional silicon nitride membranes with a patterned metal heater, measuring the complex thermal impedance Z(2ω) over several decades in frequency, and fitting it to a derived one-dimensional model that accounts for parasitic heat losses from conduction and gas load, we extract thermal conductivity and specific heat values in agreement with literature.

What carries the argument

Complex thermal impedance Z(2ω) measured at the heating frequency, modeled as a one-dimensional low-pass filter that incorporates total thermal resistance, total specific heat, and parasitic loss terms.

Load-bearing premise

The rectangular membrane geometry can be approximated by a one-dimensional model provided parasitic heat losses along the heater and from residual gas are included.

What would settle it

Extracted values of thermal conductivity or specific heat that deviate substantially from independent literature measurements on comparable silicon nitride samples would show the one-dimensional model fails to capture the response.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.06131 by Erdong Song, Erik A. Henriksen, Jason Li, Yiwei Le.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of device: suspended rectangular mem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Micrograph of SiN membrane device (100-nm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) The thermal impedance at the heating frequency, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Relative change in temperature, ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Left: 2D model of Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Toward measuring the thermal properties of exfoliated atomically thin materials, we demonstrate simultaneous measurements of the thermal conductivity and specific heat in suspended membranes. We use the 3{\omega} technique applied to quasi-two-dimensional silicon nitride membranes having a metal line heater patterned on the surface to both deliver heat and directly measure the thermal impedance of the membrane at the heating frequency, Z(2{\omega}). We derive an expression for the complex thermal impedance as a function of frequency, approximating the actual rectangular membranes with a one dimensional model. The derivation accounts for potential parasitic heat loss mechanisms including conduction along the heater line, and by the gas load in an imperfect vacuum. Qualitatively, the thermal impedance response resembles a low-pass filter, owing to the combination of the total thermal resistance and total specific heat. Fitting Z(2{\omega}) to measurements across a few decades in frequency, we extract values of the thermal conductivity and specific heat of silicon nitride in agreement with literature values. We also study the dependence on the heating current, and compare to measurements of the thermal conductivity at zero frequency.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper demonstrates simultaneous extraction of thermal conductivity and specific heat for suspended quasi-two-dimensional silicon nitride membranes using the 3ω technique. A metal heater line on the membrane measures the complex thermal impedance Z(2ω) as a function of frequency; an analytic expression is derived from a one-dimensional heat-flow model that includes parasitic conduction along the heater and residual gas load. Frequency-dependent data are fit across several decades to obtain κ and c values reported to agree with literature, with additional checks on current dependence and zero-frequency conductivity.

Significance. If the one-dimensional reduction remains accurate for the experimental aspect ratios and frequencies, the approach provides a practical route to characterize both transport and storage properties in a single measurement on thin suspended structures, which is relevant for atomically thin materials where separate steady-state and transient experiments are difficult.

major comments (1)
  1. [theory/derivation of Z(2ω)] Derivation of the thermal impedance (abstract and associated theory section): the reduction of the rectangular membrane to a strictly one-dimensional model with additive parasitic terms assumes that transverse temperature equilibration is instantaneous. For finite-aspect-ratio membranes, lateral heat spreading across the width can contribute additional phase and amplitude terms at frequencies where the thermal diffusion length is comparable to the membrane width; these contributions would be absorbed into the fitted κ and c without the model quantifying the resulting systematic bias. A direct comparison to two-dimensional finite-element solutions or an error estimate for the reported geometry is needed to confirm that the extracted values are not compensated by model error.
minor comments (2)
  1. [experimental methods] The manuscript should specify the exact membrane dimensions, heater-line width, and frequency range used in the fits so that readers can independently assess whether the thermal diffusion length remains much larger than the width.
  2. [results] Clarify whether the reported agreement with literature values is within the uncertainty of the fit or simply visual; quantitative residuals or covariance matrix for the two-parameter fit would be helpful.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the validation of the model.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [theory/derivation of Z(2ω)] Derivation of the thermal impedance (abstract and associated theory section): the reduction of the rectangular membrane to a strictly one-dimensional model with additive parasitic terms assumes that transverse temperature equilibration is instantaneous. For finite-aspect-ratio membranes, lateral heat spreading across the width can contribute additional phase and amplitude terms at frequencies where the thermal diffusion length is comparable to the membrane width; these contributions would be absorbed into the fitted κ and c without the model quantifying the resulting systematic bias. A direct comparison to two-dimensional finite-element solutions or an error estimate for the reported geometry is needed to confirm that the extracted values are not compensated by model error.

    Authors: We agree that the one-dimensional reduction requires explicit validation for finite aspect ratios to ensure no unquantified systematic bias enters the fitted κ and c. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection after the derivation of Z(2ω) that compares the analytic 1D expression to two-dimensional finite-element solutions for the precise experimental geometry (membrane length-to-width ratio ≈10:1, heater line centered). The comparison will be shown over the full frequency window used for fitting, reporting the maximum deviation in both amplitude and phase of Z(2ω). From this we will extract and tabulate an upper bound on the resulting bias in the extracted thermal conductivity and specific heat. We expect the bias to remain below the present experimental uncertainty, but the explicit quantification will be included so readers can judge the approximation directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model derived independently then fitted to data

full rationale

The paper first derives an analytic expression for the complex thermal impedance Z(2ω) from a one-dimensional heat-flow model that incorporates total thermal resistance, total specific heat, and separate additive parasitic terms for heater-line conduction and gas load. This derivation precedes any data fitting and rests on explicit physical approximations rather than on the target parameters themselves. The conductivity κ and specific heat c are then extracted as fit outputs when the derived Z(2ω) is matched to measured frequency-dependent data. No step reduces the claimed result to its own inputs by construction, no self-citation chain is load-bearing, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in. The 1D rectangular-to-1D reduction is presented as an approximation whose validity can be checked against external benchmarks, keeping the derivation self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central extraction rests on a one-dimensional heat-flow model and the assumption that all significant parasitic paths are captured by the two additional loss terms; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • thermal conductivity
    Fitted parameter extracted from the impedance magnitude and phase data.
  • specific heat
    Fitted parameter extracted from the impedance magnitude and phase data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Rectangular membrane can be approximated by a one-dimensional thermal model
    Invoked to derive the closed-form expression for Z(2ω).
  • domain assumption Parasitic conduction along heater line and residual gas load are the dominant loss channels
    Included in the model to improve the fit quality.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5503 in / 1263 out tokens · 68630 ms · 2026-05-17T00:26:54.440792+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    +hCPgGw09aXDLOm8D6SQ9pzAuvg=

    uses a 3ωmeasurement tailored for thin films sup- ported on a substrate. The temperature relaxation in a micro- or nano-calorimeter is used in Refs. [41, 42] to 4680.1246812specific heat (106J/m3·K)4567810023temperature (K) 3ω (present work) Ref.41 Ref.42 Ref.45 4681246810thermal conductivity (W/m·K)4567810023temperature (K) 3ω; dc (present work) Ref. 44 R...

  2. [2]

    Two- dimensional atomic crystals,

    K. S. Novoselov, D. Jiang, F. Schedin, T. J. Booth, V. V. Khotkevich, S. V. Morozov, & A. K. Geim, “Two- dimensional atomic crystals,” Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences102, 10451 (2005)

  3. [3]

    Superior Thermal Con- ductivity of Single-Layer Graphene,

    A. A. Balandin, S. Ghosh, W. Bao, I. Calizo, D. Tewelde- brhan, F. Miao, & C. N. Lau, “Superior Thermal Con- ductivity of Single-Layer Graphene,” Nano Letters8, 902–907 (2008)

  4. [4]

    Thermal Conductivity of Graphene in Corbino Membrane Geometry,

    C. Faugeras, B. Faugeras, M. Orlita, M. Potemski, R. R. Nair, & A. K. Geim, “Thermal Conductivity of Graphene in Corbino Membrane Geometry,” ACS Nano 4, 1889–1892 (2010)

  5. [5]

    Raman-based tech- nique for measuring thermal conductivity of graphene and related materials,

    H. Malekpour & A. A. Balandin, “Raman-based tech- nique for measuring thermal conductivity of graphene and related materials,” Journal of Raman Spectroscopy 49, 106 (2017)

  6. [6]

    Measurement of specific heat and thermal conductivity of supported and sus- pended graphene by a comprehensive Raman optother- mal method,

    Q.-Y. Li, K. Xia, J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Q. Li, K. Takahashi, & X. Zhang, “Measurement of specific heat and thermal conductivity of supported and sus- pended graphene by a comprehensive Raman optother- mal method,” Nanoscale9, 10784–10793 (2017)

  7. [7]

    Two-Dimensional Phonon Transport in Supported Graphene,

    J. H. Seol, I. Jo, A. L. Moore, L. Lindsay, Z. H. Aitken, M. T. Pettes, X. Li, Z. Yao, R. Huang, D. Broido, N. Mingo, R. S. Ruoff, & L. Shi, “Two-Dimensional Phonon Transport in Supported Graphene,” Science328, 213–216 (2010)

  8. [8]

    Thermal Transport in Suspended and Supported Few-Layer Graphene,

    Z. Wang, R. Xie, C. T. Bui, D. Liu, X. Ni, B. Li, & J. T. L. Thong, “Thermal Transport in Suspended and Supported Few-Layer Graphene,” Nano Letters11, 113–118 (2010)

  9. [9]

    Influence of Polymeric Residue on the Thermal Conductivity of Sus- pended Bilayer Graphene,

    M. T. Pettes, I. Jo, Z. Yao, & L. Shi, “Influence of Polymeric Residue on the Thermal Conductivity of Sus- pended Bilayer Graphene,” Nano Letters11, 1195–1200 (2011)

  10. [10]

    Length-dependent thermal conductivity in suspended single-layer graphene,

    X. Xu, L. F. C. Pereira, Y. Wang, J. Wu, K. Zhang, X. Zhao, S. Bae, C. Tinh Bui, R. Xie, J. T. L. Thong, B. H. Hong, K. P. Loh, D. Donadio, B. Li, & B. ¨Ozyilmaz, “Length-dependent thermal conductivity in suspended single-layer graphene,” Nature Communi- cations5(2014)

  11. [11]

    Thickness-Dependent Thermal Conductivity of Encased Graphene and Ultrathin Graphite,

    W. Jang, Z. Chen, W. Bao, C. N. Lau, & C. Dames, “Thickness-Dependent Thermal Conductivity of Encased Graphene and Ultrathin Graphite,” Nano Letters10, 3909 (2010)

  12. [12]

    Mea- surement of the Electronic Thermal Conductance Chan- nels and Heat Capacity of Graphene at Low Tempera- ture,

    K. C. Fong, E. E. Wollman, H. Ravi, W. Chen, A. A. Clerk, M. D. Shaw, H. G. LeDuc, & K. C. Schwab, “Mea- surement of the Electronic Thermal Conductance Chan- nels and Heat Capacity of Graphene at Low Tempera- ture,” Physical Review X3, 041008 (2013)

  13. [13]

    Observation of the Dirac fluid and the breakdown of the Wiedemann-Franz law in graphene,

    J. Crossno, J. K. Shi, K. Wang, X. Liu, A. Harzheim, A. Lucas, S. Sachdev, P. Kim, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, T. A. Ohki, & K. C. Fong, “Observation of the Dirac fluid and the breakdown of the Wiedemann-Franz law in graphene,” Science351, 1058 (2016)

  14. [14]

    Electronic thermal transport mea- surement in low-dimensional materials with graphene non-local noise thermometry,

    J. Waissman, L. E. Anderson, A. V. Talanov, Z. Yan, Y. J. Shin, D. H. Najafabadi, M. Rezaee, X. Feng, D. G. Nocera, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, B. Skinner, K. A. Matveev, & P. Kim, “Electronic thermal transport mea- surement in low-dimensional materials with graphene non-local noise thermometry,” Nature Nanotechnology 17, 166 (2021)

  15. [15]

    Observation of Elec- tronic Viscous Dissipation in Graphene Magneto-thermal Transport,

    A. Talanov, J. Waissman, A. Hui, B. Skinner, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, & P. Kim, “Observation of Elec- tronic Viscous Dissipation in Graphene Magneto-thermal Transport,” (2024)

  16. [16]

    Temperature-Dependent Raman Stud- ies and Thermal Conductivity of Few-Layer MoS 2,

    S. Sahoo, A. P. S. Gaur, M. Ahmadi, M. J.-F. Guinel, & R. S. Katiyar, “Temperature-Dependent Raman Stud- ies and Thermal Conductivity of Few-Layer MoS 2,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C117, 9042–9047 (2013)

  17. [17]

    Thermal Conductivity and Phonon Transport in Suspended Few-Layer Hexagonal Boron Ni- tride,

    I. Jo, M. T. Pettes, J. Kim, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Yao, & L. Shi, “Thermal Conductivity and Phonon Transport in Suspended Few-Layer Hexagonal Boron Ni- tride,” Nano Letters13, 550–554 (2013)

  18. [18]

    Basal-plane thermal conductivity of few-layer molybdenum disul- fide,

    I. Jo, M. T. Pettes, E. Ou, W. Wu, & L. Shi, “Basal-plane thermal conductivity of few-layer molybdenum disul- fide,” Applied Physics Letters104, 201902 (2014)

  19. [19]

    Anisotropic in-plane thermal conductivity of black phos- phorus nanoribbons at temperatures higher than 100 K,

    S. Lee, F. Yang, J. Suh, S. Yang, Y. Lee, G. Li, H. Sung Choe, A. Suslu, Y. Chen, C. Ko, J. Park, K. Liu, J. Li, K. Hippalgaonkar, J. J. Urban, S. Tongay, & J. Wu, “Anisotropic in-plane thermal conductivity of black phos- phorus nanoribbons at temperatures higher than 100 K,” Nature Communications6, 9573 (2015)

  20. [20]

    Phonon and thermal properties of exfoliated TaSe2 thin films,

    Z. Yan, C. Jiang, T. R. Pope, C. F. Tsang, J. L. Stickney, P. Goli, J. Renteria, T. T. Salguero, & A. A. Balandin, “Phonon and thermal properties of exfoliated TaSe2 thin films,” Journal of Applied Physics114(2013)

  21. [21]

    High accuracy determi- nation of the thermal properties of supported 2D mate- rials,

    J. Judek, A. P. Gertych, M. ´Swiniarski, A. Lapi´ nska, A. Du˙ zy´ nska, & M. Zdrojek, “High accuracy determi- nation of the thermal properties of supported 2D mate- rials,” Scientific Reports5, 12422 (2015)

  22. [22]

    High ther- mal conductivity of suspended few-layer hexagonal boron nitride sheets,

    H. Zhou, J. Zhu, Z. Liu, Z. Yan, X. Fan, J. Lin, G. Wang, Q. Yan, T. Yu, P. M. Ajayan, & J. M. Tour, “High ther- mal conductivity of suspended few-layer hexagonal boron nitride sheets,” Nano Research7, 1232–1240 (2014)

  23. [23]

    Thermal Conductivity of Monolayer Molybdenum Disulfide Obtained from Temperature-Dependent Raman Spectroscopy,

    R. Yan, J. R. Simpson, S. Bertolazzi, J. Brivio, M. Wat- son, X. Wu, A. Kis, T. Luo, A. R. Hight Walker, & H. G. Xing, “Thermal Conductivity of Monolayer Molybdenum Disulfide Obtained from Temperature-Dependent Raman Spectroscopy,” ACS Nano8, 986–993 (2014)

  24. [24]

    Thermal conductivity determination of sus- pended mono- and bilayer WS2 by Raman spectroscopy,

    N. Peimyoo, J. Shang, W. Yang, Y. Wang, C. Cong, & T. Yu, “Thermal conductivity determination of sus- pended mono- and bilayer WS2 by Raman spectroscopy,” Nano Research8, 1210–1221 (2014)

  25. [25]

    Measurement of Lateral and Interfacial Thermal Conductivity of Single- 8 and Bilayer MoS2 and MoSe2 Using Refined Optothermal Raman Technique,

    X. Zhang, D. Sun, Y. Li, G.-H. Lee, X. Cui, D. Chenet, Y. You, T. F. Heinz, & J. C. Hone, “Measurement of Lateral and Interfacial Thermal Conductivity of Single- 8 and Bilayer MoS2 and MoSe2 Using Refined Optothermal Raman Technique,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 7, 25923–25929 (2015)

  26. [26]

    Phonon transport and thermal con- ductivity in two-dimensional materials,

    X. Gu & R. Yang, “Phonon transport and thermal con- ductivity in two-dimensional materials,” Annual Review of Heat Transfer19, 1 (2016)

  27. [27]

    Two-Dimensional Materials for Thermal Management Applications,

    H. Song, J. Liu, B. Liu, J. Wu, H.-M. Cheng, & F. Kang, “Two-Dimensional Materials for Thermal Management Applications,” Joule2, 442–463 (2018)

  28. [28]

    T. S. Kasirga,Thermal Conductivity Measurements in 2D Materials, 11, Springer Singapore (2020)

  29. [29]

    Extremely anisotropic van der Waals thermal conductors,

    S. E. Kim, F. Mujid, A. Rai, F. Eriksson, J. Suh, P. Pod- dar, A. Ray, C. Park, E. Fransson, Y. Zhong, D. A. Muller, P. Erhart, D. G. Cahill, & J. Park, “Extremely anisotropic van der Waals thermal conductors,” Nature 597, 660 (2021)

  30. [30]

    Thermal Transport in 2D Materials,

    M. H. Kalantari & X. Zhang, “Thermal Transport in 2D Materials,” Nanomaterials13, 117 (2022)

  31. [31]

    Ultrasensitive and Wide- Bandwidth Thermal Measurements of Graphene at Low Temperatures,

    K. C. Fong & K. C. Schwab, “Ultrasensitive and Wide- Bandwidth Thermal Measurements of Graphene at Low Temperatures,” Physical Review X2, 031006 (2012)

  32. [32]

    Ultrasensitive Calorimet- ric Measurements of the Electronic Heat Capacity of Graphene,

    M. A. Aamir, J. N. Moore, X. Lu, P. Seifert, D. Englund, K. C. Fong, & D. K. Efetov, “Ultrasensitive Calorimet- ric Measurements of the Electronic Heat Capacity of Graphene,” Nano Letters21, 5330–5337 (2021)

  33. [33]

    Optomechani- cal methodology for characterizing the thermal properties of 2D materials,

    H. Liu, H. Brahmi, C. Boix-Constant, H. S. J. van der Zant, P. G. Steeneken, & G. J. Verbiest, “Optomechani- cal methodology for characterizing the thermal properties of 2D materials,” APL Materials12(2024)

  34. [34]

    Aerogels as Promising Ther- mal Insulating Materials: An Overview,

    P. C. Thapliyal & K. Singh, “Aerogels as Promising Ther- mal Insulating Materials: An Overview,” Journal of Ma- terials2014, 1–10 (2014)

  35. [35]

    Specific-heat spectroscopy of glycerol and propylene glycol near the glass transition,

    N. O. Birge, “Specific-heat spectroscopy of glycerol and propylene glycol near the glass transition,” Physical Re- view B34, 1631 (1986)

  36. [36]

    Thermal conductivity of amorphous solids above the plateau,

    D. G. Cahill & R. O. Pohl, “Thermal conductivity of amorphous solids above the plateau,” Physical Review B 35, 4067 (1987)

  37. [37]

    Thermal conductivity measurement from 30 to 750 K: the 3ωmethod,

    D. G. Cahill, “Thermal conductivity measurement from 30 to 750 K: the 3ωmethod,” Review of Scientific Instru- ments61, 802 (1990)

  38. [38]

    1ω, 2ω, and 3ωmethods for mea- surements of thermal properties,

    C. Dames & G. Chen, “1ω, 2ω, and 3ωmethods for mea- surements of thermal properties,” Review of Scientific Instruments76, 124902 (2005)

  39. [39]

    Measuring the thermal conductivity of thin films: 3 omega and related electrothermal methods,

    C. Dames, “Measuring the thermal conductivity of thin films: 3 omega and related electrothermal methods,” An- nual Review of Heat Transfer16, 7 (2013)

  40. [40]

    Violation of the Wiedemann- Franz law through reduction of thermal conductivity in gold thin films,

    S. J. Mason, D. J. Wesenberg, A. Hojem, M. Manno, C. Leighton, & B. L. Zink, “Violation of the Wiedemann- Franz law through reduction of thermal conductivity in gold thin films,” Physical Review Materials4, 065003 (2020)

  41. [41]

    Heat transport in thin dielec- tric films,

    S.-M. Lee & D. G. Cahill, “Heat transport in thin dielec- tric films,” Journal of Applied Physics81, 2590–2595 (1997)

  42. [42]

    Specific heat and thermal con- ductivity of low-stress amorphous Si–N membranes,

    B. Zink & F. Hellman, “Specific heat and thermal con- ductivity of low-stress amorphous Si–N membranes,” Solid State Communications129, 199–204 (2004)

  43. [43]

    Thin film nanocalorimeter for heat capacity measurements of 30 nm films,

    D. R. Queen & F. Hellman, “Thin film nanocalorimeter for heat capacity measurements of 30 nm films,” Review of Scientific Instruments80, 063901 (2009)

  44. [44]

    Highly sensitive ther- mal conductivity measurements of suspended membranes (SiN and diamond) using a 3ω-V¨ olklein method,

    A. Sikora, H. Ftouni, J. Richard, C. H´ ebert, D. Eon, F. Omn` es, & O. Bourgeois, “Highly sensitive ther- mal conductivity measurements of suspended membranes (SiN and diamond) using a 3ω-V¨ olklein method,” Review of Scientific Instruments83, 054902 (2012)

  45. [45]

    Erratum: “Highly sensitive thermal conductivity measurements of suspended mem- branes (SiN and diamond) using a 3ω-V¨ olklein method

    A. Sikora, H. Ftouni, J. Richard, C. H´ ebert, D. Eon, F. Omn` es, & O. Bourgeois, “Erratum: “Highly sensitive thermal conductivity measurements of suspended mem- branes (SiN and diamond) using a 3ω-V¨ olklein method” [Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 054902 (2012)],” Review of Scien- tific Instruments84, 029901 (2013)

  46. [46]

    Specific heat measurement of thin suspended SiN membrane from 8 K to 300 K using the 3ω-V¨ olklein method,

    H. Ftouni, D. Tainoff, J. Richard, K. Lulla, J. Guidi, E. Collin, & O. Bourgeois, “Specific heat measurement of thin suspended SiN membrane from 8 K to 300 K using the 3ω-V¨ olklein method,” Review of Scientific In- struments84, 094902 (2013)

  47. [47]

    Thermal conductivity of silicon nitride membranes is not sensitive to stress,

    H. Ftouni, C. Blanc, D. Tainoff, A. D. Fefferman, M. De- foort, K. J. Lulla, J. Richard, E. Collin, & O. Bourgeois, “Thermal conductivity of silicon nitride membranes is not sensitive to stress,” Physical Review B92, 125439 (2015)

  48. [48]

    Silicon ni- tride single-layer x-ray mask,

    M. Sekimoto, H. Yoshihara, & T. Ohkubo, “Silicon ni- tride single-layer x-ray mask,” Journal of Vacuum Sci- ence and Technology21, 1017–1021 (1982)

  49. [49]

    Op- timization of gold germanium (Au 0.17Ge0.83) thin films for high sensitivity resistance thermometry,

    E. A. Scott, C. M. Smyth, M. K. Singh, T.-M. Lu, P. Sharma, D. Pete, J. Watt, & C. Thomas Harris, “Op- timization of gold germanium (Au 0.17Ge0.83) thin films for high sensitivity resistance thermometry,” Journal of Applied Physics132, 0099182 (2022)

  50. [50]

    Thermal Exchange of Glass Micro-Fibers Measured by the 3ωTechnique,

    T. D. Nguyen, J. Richard, J. Doumouro, Y. De Wilde, & O. Bourgeois, “Thermal Exchange of Glass Micro-Fibers Measured by the 3ωTechnique,” Journal of Heat Transfer 142, 101701 (2020)