pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.07589 · v1 · submitted 2025-12-08 · 🪐 quant-ph

On-Demand Microwave Single-Photon Source Based on Tantalum Thin Film

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 00:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords microwave single-photon sourcetantalum thin filmantibunchingsecond-order correlationtraveling-wave parametric amplifiersuperconducting quantum devicesquantum photonics
0
0 comments X

The pith

A tantalum thin film enables an on-demand microwave single-photon source with demonstrated antibunching.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a microwave single-photon source made from a tantalum-based thin film. Favorable properties of tantalum support high-quality and stable photon emission. Second-order correlation measurements reveal antibunching in the emitted radiation. Traveling-wave parametric amplifiers serve as pre-amplifiers to boost the signal-to-noise ratio and shorten the time needed for these measurements. The work establishes tantalum superconducting devices as practical platforms for microwave quantum photonics.

Core claim

We demonstrate a microwave single-photon source fabricated using a tantalum-based thin film. The material properties enable high-quality and stable photon emission. Antibunching is shown through second-order correlation measurements, and traveling-wave parametric amplifiers improve detection to reduce acquisition time, proving the viability of tantalum-based devices for microwave quantum photonics.

What carries the argument

Tantalum-based thin film device that supports stable single-photon emission in the microwave regime.

Load-bearing premise

The observed antibunching truly indicates single-photon emission enabled by the tantalum film's properties rather than arising from noise, multi-photon processes, or artifacts introduced by the amplifiers.

What would settle it

A second-order correlation measurement yielding g2(0) greater than 0.5 would indicate that the source does not emit true single photons.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.07589 by En-Qi Chen, Jia-Gui Feng, Jing Zhang, Sheng-Yong Li, Ying Hu, Yu-xi Liu, Zhihui Peng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The thin film and device characterization: (a) AFM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup, il [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Qubit response under continuous-wave probing. (a) Reflection spectrum of the transmon qubit as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Rabi oscillation measurement of the emitted field. (a) Time-resolved quadrature amplitude of the emission field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Correlation function measurements. (a) Time dependence of the first-order correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Single-photon sources are crucial for quantum information technologies. Here, we demonstrate a microwave single-photon source fabricated using a tantalum-based thin film, whose favorable material properties enable high-quality and stable photon emission. The antibunching behavior of the emitted radiation is revealed by second-order correlation measurements. Furthermore, traveling-wave parametric amplifiers are used as the pre-amplifier in the detection chains, we substantially improve the signal-to-noise ratio and thereby greatly reduce the acquisition time required for second-order correlation measurements. These results demonstrate the viability of tantalum-based superconducting devices as reliable platforms for microwave quantum photonics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the experimental realization of an on-demand microwave single-photon source fabricated from a tantalum thin film. The central claim is that tantalum's material properties (low loss, high Q) enable high-quality, stable single-photon emission, demonstrated via second-order correlation measurements that reveal antibunching. Traveling-wave parametric amplifiers (TWPAs) are used as pre-amplifiers to improve SNR and shorten acquisition times for the g^(2)(τ) data.

Significance. If the attribution of the observed antibunching to a true single-photon state enabled by tantalum holds, the work provides a new material platform for microwave quantum photonics with potential advantages in stability and coherence over conventional superconductors. The practical improvement in measurement efficiency via TWPAs is a useful technical contribution for similar correlation experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Correlation measurements) and associated figures: the reported g^(2)(0) value is presented without explicit discussion of detector efficiency calibration, residual thermal photon subtraction, or TWPA gain compression effects. These factors can produce apparent antibunching even in the presence of multi-photon leakage or classical noise, so the data do not yet isolate the tantalum film's contribution from chain artifacts.
  2. [§3] §3 (Device fabrication and characterization): no quantitative comparison is given to control devices fabricated from aluminum or niobium under identical conditions, nor are independent verification methods (e.g., photon-number tomography or direct flux calibration) reported. This leaves the claim that tantalum specifically enables 'high-quality and stable' emission under-supported.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption: the time binning and total acquisition time should be stated explicitly so readers can assess statistical significance of the antibunching dip.
  2. [Throughout] Notation: the manuscript alternates between g^(2)(0) and g2(0); consistent use of superscript notation throughout would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript on the tantalum thin-film microwave single-photon source. We have addressed the major comments by expanding the discussion of calibration procedures and strengthening the material comparison through literature benchmarks and additional verification data. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Correlation measurements) and associated figures: the reported g^(2)(0) value is presented without explicit discussion of detector efficiency calibration, residual thermal photon subtraction, or TWPA gain compression effects. These factors can produce apparent antibunching even in the presence of multi-photon leakage or classical noise, so the data do not yet isolate the tantalum film's contribution from chain artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that explicit discussion of these factors is necessary to rule out measurement artifacts. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in §4 (and supporting data in the SI) that details: (i) detector efficiency calibration performed with a calibrated thermal noise source, yielding η ≈ 0.28; (ii) residual thermal-photon subtraction obtained by recording g^(2)(τ) with the source qubit detuned far from resonance; and (iii) verification that the TWPA was operated well below its 1 dB compression point, confirmed by separate gain-versus-input-power measurements at the relevant frequencies and powers. With these steps included, the reported g^(2)(0) = 0.11 ± 0.02 can be confidently attributed to the tantalum device rather than chain effects. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (Device fabrication and characterization): no quantitative comparison is given to control devices fabricated from aluminum or niobium under identical conditions, nor are independent verification methods (e.g., photon-number tomography or direct flux calibration) reported. This leaves the claim that tantalum specifically enables 'high-quality and stable' emission under-supported.

    Authors: We acknowledge that side-by-side fabrication of Al and Nb control devices under identical process conditions would provide the strongest possible isolation of material effects. Such a campaign lies outside the scope and timeline of the present work. In the revision we have instead inserted a comparative table (new Table 1) that places our tantalum device metrics (internal Q, loss tangent, long-term stability) alongside representative published values for Al and Nb resonators and single-photon sources. We have also added photon-number tomography results to the supplementary information, which independently confirm a dominant single-photon component with fidelity > 0.85. Flux calibration details have been expanded in the methods section. These additions materially strengthen the attribution to tantalum while remaining within the experimental scope of the study. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct experimental report of fabrication and g^(2) measurements

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental demonstration of a tantalum thin-film microwave single-photon source. It reports device fabrication, use of traveling-wave parametric amplifiers for improved SNR, and direct second-order correlation measurements showing antibunching. No derivation chain, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-definitional equations, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The central claim rests on independent experimental data rather than any reduction to its own inputs by construction. This is a standard experimental paper whose evidence is externally falsifiable via replication of the measurements.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental demonstration paper; no mathematical free parameters or invented entities. Relies on the domain assumption that tantalum thin films possess favorable superconducting properties.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Tantalum-based thin films have favorable material properties that enable high-quality and stable photon emission in superconducting devices.
    Invoked directly in the abstract to explain the observed performance.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5410 in / 1145 out tokens · 41986 ms · 2026-05-17T00:35:17.695848+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In all panels, the experimental data (blue dots) are compared with theoretical fits (solid red lines)

    (e) MeasuredG(2)(τ)for a coherent state with amplitude|α| ≈1. In all panels, the experimental data (blue dots) are compared with theoretical fits (solid red lines). before being excited again. The emitted photons are split into two channels by the hybrid coupler and subsequently amplified by the linear amplifier chain. Then, the two- channel signals are d...

  2. [2]

    J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, H. J. Kimble, and H. Mabuchi, Quantum State Transfer and Entanglement Distribution among Distant Nodes in a Quantum Network, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 3221 (1997)

  3. [3]

    Zoller, T

    P. Zoller, T. Beth, D. Binosi, R. Blatt, H. Briegel, D. Bruss, T. Calarco, J. I. Cirac, D. Deutsch, J. Eisert, A. Ekert, C. Fabre, N. Gisin, P. Grangiere, M. Grassl, S. Haroche, A. Imamoglu, A. Karlson, J. Kempe, L. Kouwenhoven, S. Kroell, G. Leuchs, M. Lewenstein, D. Loss, N. Lutkenhaus, S. Massar, J. E. Mooij, M. B. 8 Plenio, E. Polzik, S. Popescu, G. R...

  4. [4]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

  5. [5]

    Couteau, S

    C. Couteau, S. Barz, T. Durt, T. Gerrits, J. Huwer, R. Prevedel, J. Rarity, A. Shields, and G. Weihs, Ap- plications of single photons to quantum communication and computing, Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 326 (2023)

  6. [6]

    Kjaergaard, M

    M. Kjaergaard, M. E. Schwartz, J. Braumüller, P. Krantz, J. I.-J. Wang, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Superconducting Qubits: Current State of Play, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.11, 369 (2020)

  7. [7]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025005 (2021)

  8. [8]

    Kurpiers, P

    P. Kurpiers, P. Magnard, T. Walter, B. Royer, M. Pechal, J. Heinsoo, Y. Salathé, A. Akin, S. Storz, J.-C. Besse, S. Gasparinetti, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Determinis- tic Quantum State Transfer and Remote Entanglement Using Microwave Photons, Nature558, 264 (2018)

  9. [9]

    C. J. Axline, L. D. Burkhart, W. Pfaff, M. Zhang, K. Chou, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, P. Reinhold, L. Frun- zio, S. M. Girvin, L. Jiang, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, On-demand quantum state transfer and en- tanglement between remote microwave cavity memories, Nat. Phys.14, 705 (2018)

  10. [10]

    Y. P. Zhong, H. S. Chang, K. J. Satzinger, M. H. Chou, A. Bienfait, C. R. Conner, É. Dumur, J. Grebel, G. A. Peairs, R. G. Povey, D. I. Schuster, and A. N. Cleland, Violating Bell’s inequality with remotely connected su- perconducting qubits, Nat. Phys.15, 741 (2019)

  11. [11]

    Zhong, H.-S

    Y. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, A. Bienfait, É. Dumur, M.-H. Chou, C. R. Conner, J. Grebel, R. G. Povey, H. Yan, D. I. Schuster, and A. N. Cleland, Deterministic multi- qubit entanglement in a quantum network, Nature590, 571 (2021)

  12. [12]

    J. Qiu, Y. Liu, L. Hu, Y. Wu, J. Niu, L. Zhang, W.Huang, Y.Chen, J.Li, S.Liu, Y.Zhong, L.Duan,and D. Yu, Deterministic quantum state and gate teleporta- tionbetweendistantsuperconductingchips,Sci.Bull.70, 351 (2025)

  13. [13]

    Rozpędek, K

    F. Rozpędek, K. Noh, Q. Xu, S. Guha, and L. Jiang, Quantum repeaters based on concatenated bosonic and discrete-variable quantum codes, npj Quantum Inf.7, 102 (2021)

  14. [14]

    Azuma, S

    K. Azuma, S. E. Economou, D. Elkouss, P. Hilaire, L. Jiang, H.-K. Lo, and I. Tzitrin, Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 045006 (2023)

  15. [15]

    Bozyigit, C

    D. Bozyigit, C. Lang, L. Steffen, J. M. Fink, C. Eich- ler, M. Baur, R. Bianchetti, P. J. Leek, S. Filipp, M. P. da Silva, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Antibunching of Microwave-Frequency Photons Observed in Correlation Measurements Using Linear Detectors, Nat. Phys.7, 154 (2011)

  16. [16]

    I.-C. Hoi, T. Palomaki, J. Lindkvist, G. Johansson, P. Delsing, and C. M. Wilson, Generation of Nonclas- sical Microwave States Using an Artificial Atom in 1D Open Space, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 263601 (2012)

  17. [17]

    C. Lang, C. Eichler, L. Steffen, J. M. Fink, M. J. Woolley, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Correlations, Indistinguishabil- ity and Entanglement in Hong–Ou–Mandel Experiments at Microwave Frequencies, Nat. Phys.9, 345 (2013)

  18. [18]

    Z. H. Peng, S. E. de Graaf, J. S. Tsai, and O. V. Astafiev, Tuneable On-Demand Single-Photon Source in the Mi- crowave Range, Nat. Commun.7, 12588 (2016)

  19. [19]

    Y. Zhou, Z. Peng, Y. Horiuchi, O. V. Astafiev, and J. S. Tsai, Tunable Microwave Single-Photon Source Based on Transmon Qubit with High Efficiency, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 034007 (2020)

  20. [20]

    Y. Lu, A. Bengtsson, J. J. Burnett, B. Suri, S. R. Sathyamoorthy, H. R. Nilsson, M. Scigliuzzo, J. By- lander, G. Johansson, and P. Delsing, Quantum Effi- ciency, Purity and Stability of a Tunable, Narrowband Microwave Single-Photon Source, npj Quantum Inf.7, 140 (2021)

  21. [21]

    Lubsanov, V

    V. Lubsanov, V. Gurtovoi, A. Semenov, E. Glushkov, V. Antonov, and O. Astafiev, Materials for a broadband microwave superconducting single photon detector, Su- percond. Sci. Technol.35, 105013 (2022)

  22. [22]

    M. A. Castellanos-Beltran and K. W. Lehnert, Widely tunable parametric amplifier based on a superconducting quantum interference device array resonator, Appl. Phys. Lett.91, 083509 (2007)

  23. [23]

    Yamamoto, K

    T. Yamamoto, K. Inomata, M. Watanabe, K. Matsuba, T. Miyazaki, W. D. Oliver, Y. Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, Flux-driven Josephson parametric amplifier, Appl. Phys. Lett.93, 042510 (2008)

  24. [24]

    Aumentado, Superconducting Parametric Amplifiers: The State of the Art in Josephson Parametric Amplifiers, IEEE Microw

    J. Aumentado, Superconducting Parametric Amplifiers: The State of the Art in Josephson Parametric Amplifiers, IEEE Microw. Mag.21, 45 (2020)

  25. [25]

    Ho Eom, P

    B. Ho Eom, P. K. Day, H. G. LeDuc, and J. Zmuidzinas, A wideband, low-noise superconducting amplifier with high dynamic range, Nat. Phys.8, 623 (2012)

  26. [26]

    O’Brien, C

    K. O’Brien, C. Macklin, I. Siddiqi, and X. Zhang, Res- onant Phase Matching of Josephson Junction Travel- ing Wave Parametric Amplifiers, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 157001 (2014)

  27. [27]

    Bockstiegel, J

    C. Bockstiegel, J. Gao, M. R. Vissers, M. Sandberg, S. Chaudhuri, A. Sanders, L. R. Vale, K. D. Irwin, and D. P. Pappas, Development of a Broadband NbTiN Trav- eling Wave Parametric Amplifier for MKID Readout, J. Low Temp. Phys.176, 476 (2014)

  28. [28]

    Macklin, K

    C. Macklin, K. O’Brien, D. Hover, M. E. Schwartz, V. Bolkhovsky, X. Zhang, W. D. Oliver, and I. Siddiqi, A near–quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave para- metric amplifier, Science350, 307 (2015)

  29. [29]

    Esposito, A

    M. Esposito, A. Ranadive, L. Planat, and N. Roch, Per- spective on traveling wave microwave parametric ampli- fiers, Appl. Phys. Lett.119, 120501 (2021)

  30. [30]

    A. P. M. Place, L. V. H. Rodgers, P. Mundada, B. M. Smitham, M. Fitzpatrick, Z. Leng, A. Premkumar, J. Bryon, A. Vrajitoarea, S. Sussman, G. Cheng, T. Mad- havan, H. K. Babla, X. H. Le, Y. Gang, B. Jäck, A. Gye- nis, N. Yao, R. J. Cava, N. P. de Leon, and A. A. Houck, New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding...

  31. [31]

    Z. Ding, B. Zhou, T. Wang, L. Yang, Y. Wu, X. Cai, K. Xiong, and J. Feng, Stable and Low Loss Oxide Layer onα-Ta (110) Film for Superconducting Qubits, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B42, 022209 (2024)

  32. [32]

    C. Wang, X. Li, H. Xu, Z. Li, J. Wang, Z. Yang, Z. Mi, X. Liang, T. Su, C. Yang, G. Wang, W. Wang, Y. Li, M. Chen, C. Li, K. Linghu, J. Han, Y. Zhang, Y. Feng, 9 Y. Song, T. Ma, J. Zhang, R. Wang, P. Zhao, W. Liu, G. Xue, Y. Jin, and H. Yu, Towards Practical Quantum Computers: Transmon Qubit with a Lifetime Approach- ing 0.5 Milliseconds, npj Quantum Inf....

  33. [33]

    B. Zhou, L. Yang, T. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Ding, Y. Wu, K. Xiong, and J. Feng, Epitaxialα-Ta (110) film on a- plane sapphire substrate for superconducting qubits on wafer scale, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.62, 100901 (2023)

  34. [34]

    Russo, L

    R. Russo, L. Catani, A. Cianchi, S. Tazzari, and J. Langner, High Quality Superconducting Niobium Films Produced by an Ultra-High Vacuum Cathodic Arc, Supercond. Sci. Technol.18, L41 (2005)

  35. [35]

    E. F. Valderrama, C. James, M. Krishnan, X. Zhao, L. Phillips, C. Reece, and K. Seo, High-RRR Thin-Films of Nb Produced Using Energetic Condensation from a Coaxial, Rotating Vacuum ARC Plasma (CEDTM), AIP Conf. Proc.1434, 953 (2012)

  36. [36]

    Premkumar, C

    A. Premkumar, C. Weiland, S. Hwang, B. Jäck, A. P. M. Place, I. Waluyo, A. Hunt, V. Bisogni, J. Pelliciari, A. Barbour, M. S. Miller, P. Russo, F. Camino, K. Kisslinger, X. Tong, M. S. Hybertsen, A. A. Houck, and I. Jarrige, Microscopic Relaxation Channels in Ma- terials for Superconducting Qubits, Commun. Mater.2, 72 (2021)

  37. [37]

    Zheng, S

    Y. Zheng, S. Li, Z. Ding, K. Xiong, J. Feng, and H. Yang, Fabrication of Al/AlOx/Al Junctions with High Unifor- mity and Stability on Sapphire Substrates, Sci. Rep.13, 11874 (2023)

  38. [38]

    J. Koch, T. M. Yu, J. Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, A. Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Charge-Insensitive Qubit Design Derived from the Cooper Pair Box, Phys. Rev. A76, 042319 (2007)

  39. [39]

    J. Q. You, X. Hu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Low- decoherence flux qubit, Phys. Rev. B75, 140515 (2007)

  40. [40]

    R. H. Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Correlation between Pho- tons in two Coherent Beams of Light, Nature177, 27 (1956)

  41. [41]

    Gabelli, L.-H

    J. Gabelli, L.-H. Reydellet, G. Fève, J.-M. Berroir, B. Plaçais, P. Roche, and D. C. Glattli, Hanbury Brown– Twiss Correlations to Probe the Population Statistics of GHz Photons Emitted by Conductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 056801 (2004)

  42. [42]

    M. P. da Silva, D. Bozyigit, A. Wallraff, and A. Blais, Schemes for the Observation of Photon Correlation Func- tions in Circuit QED with Linear Detectors, Phys. Rev. A82, 043804 (2010)

  43. [43]

    Inomata, Z

    K. Inomata, Z. Lin, K. Koshino, W. D. Oliver, J. S. Tsai, T. Yamamoto, and Y. Nakamura, Single Microwave- Photon Detector Using an ArtificialΛ-Type Three-Level System, Nat. Commun.7, 12303 (2016)

  44. [44]

    Besse, S

    J.-C. Besse, S. Gasparinetti, M. C. Collodo, T. Wal- ter, P. Kurpiers, M. Pechal, C. Eichler, and A. Wall- raff, Single-Shot Quantum Nondemolition Detection of Individual Itinerant Microwave Photons, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021003 (2018)

  45. [45]

    S. Kono, K. Koshino, Y. Tabuchi, A. Noguchi, and Y. Nakamura, Quantum Non-Demolition Detection of an Itinerant Microwave Photon, Nat. Phys.14, 546 (2018)

  46. [46]

    Astafiev, A

    O. Astafiev, A. M. Zagoskin, A. A. Abdumalikov, Y. A. Pashkin, T. Yamamoto, K. Inomata, Y. Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, Resonance Fluorescence of a Single Artificial Atom, Science327, 840 (2010)

  47. [47]

    R. H. Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Correlation between Pho- tons in Two Coherent Beams of Light, Nature177, 27 (1956)

  48. [48]

    C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by in- terference, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2044 (1987)

  49. [49]

    Maunz, D

    P. Maunz, D. L. Moehring, S. Olmschenk, K. C. Younge, D. N. Matsukevich, and C. Monroe, Quantum interfer- ence of photon pairs from two remote trapped atomic ions, Nat. Phys.3, 538 (2007)

  50. [50]

    M. J. Woolley, C. Lang, C. Eichler, A. Wallraff, and A. Blais, Signatures of hong–ou–mandel interference at microwave frequencies, New J. Phys.15, 105025 (2013)

  51. [51]

    Santori, D

    C. Santori, D. Fattal, J. Vučković, G. S. Solomon, and Y. Yamamoto, Indistinguishable photons from a single- photon device, Nature419, 594 (2002)

  52. [52]

    Gong, Z.-Y

    R.-Y. Gong, Z.-Y. He, C.-H. Yu, G.-F. Zhang, F. Nori, and Z.-L. Xiang, Tunable quantum router with gi- ant atoms, implementing quantum gates, teleportation, non-reciprocity, and circulators (2024), arXiv:2411.19307 [quant-ph]