pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2512.08003 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-08 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Quadrupole spectra derived from 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb identified-hadron bf v₂(p_t) data

Thomas A. Trainor
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 00:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords v2(pt)quadrupole spectraPb-Pb collisionsidentified hadronsQCD processradial flowelliptic flowparticle sources
0
0 comments X

The pith

v2(pt) data from 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb collisions show that a single dominant particle source cannot account for the observations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the algebraic structure of v2(pt) to derive a common radial-flow boost shared across species and separate quadrupole pt spectra for each hadron. Applied to published data for pions, kaons, and protons from 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb collisions, the decomposition reveals inconsistencies with the assumption that nearly all particles come from one source. The extracted quadrupole spectra, when combined with earlier p-p results, indicate that the quadrupole arises from a QCD process distinct from nucleon dissociation and jet production. Consequently the evolution of this component is unlikely to be described by hydrodynamics.

Core claim

A procedure is developed to decompose v2(pt) into a common monopole boost and species-specific quadrupole pt spectra. When applied to identified-hadron data from 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb collisions the resulting quadrupole spectra demonstrate that the single-source assumption built into standard v2 definitions is not supported by the data. Together with prior quadrupole-amplitude studies in 200 GeV p-p collisions these results establish that quadrupole structure originates in a novel QCD process separate from projectile-nucleon dissociation and jet production, making a hydrodynamic description of the quadrupole evolution inapplicable.

What carries the argument

Algebraic decomposition of v2(pt) into a shared monopole boost and hadron-species-dependent quadrupole pt spectra.

If this is right

  • Quadrupole structure is independent of projectile-nucleon dissociation and jet production.
  • A hydrodynamic description is not relevant to the quadrupole process.
  • The method extracts quadrupole spectra without invoking a single dominant source.
  • Quadrupole evolution observed across p-p and A-A systems arises from the same novel QCD mechanism.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The decomposition technique could be tested on data from other collision systems or energies to track how the quadrupole component changes with system size.
  • Alternative QCD models that generate quadrupole structure without collective flow, such as certain string or color-glass mechanisms, could be confronted directly with the extracted spectra.
  • If the multiple-source picture holds, reinterpretations of other flow observables that assume a single equilibrated medium would require re-examination.

Load-bearing premise

The algebraic structure of v2(pt) permits a unique decomposition into a common monopole boost and species-specific quadrupole pt spectra using only the published data for three hadron species without additional model assumptions.

What would settle it

A demonstration that no single common boost value simultaneously reproduces the v2(pt) curves for all three species, or new higher-precision data showing that a single-source hydrodynamic model fits with equal or fewer parameters, would falsify the multiple-source conclusion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.08003 by Thomas A. Trainor.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Left: Lambda data from Fig. 1 (right, open points) on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Data from Fig. 2 (right) divided by kinematic factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows published v2{SP}(pt, nch) data for four hadron species from 15 million 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb colli￾sions in seven centrality bins: 0-5%, 5-10%, 10-20%, 20- 30%, 30-40%, 40-50% and 50-60% [21]. The method em￾ployed for that analysis is the so-called scalar-product (SP) method [31].1 For each hadron species (pions, charged kaons, protons and Lambdas) particles and an￾tiparticles are summed. Error bars represe… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Data from Fig. 4 rescaled by factor 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows data for kaons and protons from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Left: 2.76 TeV data and 200 GeV dashed curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Data prepared as in Fig. 7 but shifted on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Data from Fig. 9 (right) transformed to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: (Color online) Perspective views of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Left: NJ quadrupole correlations from 200 GeV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: (left) summarizes measured quadrupole en￾ergy dependence from Bevalac to LHC energies. AQ values reported previously are here rescaled per the de￾scription at the beginning of Sec. V. AQ data maxima near b/b0 ≈ 0.5 minimize the relative effects of jet (“non￾flow”) contributions to AQ{method}. Above 13 GeV the function R( √ sNN ) ≡ log(√ sNN /13 GeV)/ log(200/13) (solid line) describes the energy evolution… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Presently-available data do not require any sig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (left) shows Eq. (18) for three hadron species (π, K, p) and fixed ∆yt0 = 0.6 (based on Ref. [19]). Ex￾pression ∆yt2/2T2 ≈ 0.15/GeV is adjusted so that the “ideal hydro” trends (solid, dashed, dash-dotted) corre￾spond approximately to v2(pt) data at lower pt in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Left [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: (left) from Ref. [41] illustrates inference of Pb-Pb geometry parameters for unidentified hadrons. Total soft density ¯ρs = ¯ρ0/(1 + xν) is the solid curve. The lower dash-dotted curve is ¯ρsNN that follows ¯ρs up to a transition point near ¯ρ0 ≈ 15 and then follows a much-reduced rate of increase, taken here as zero slope, following a procedure first described in Ref. [23]. 1 10 10 2 10 3 1 10 10 2 10 3 … view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Identified-hadron spectra for three hadron species [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

$p_t$-differential quantity $v_2(p_t)$ is meant to measure elliptic flow manifested by a dense QCD medium formed in high-energy nucleus-nucleus collisions. Elliptic flow may be referred to more neutrally as a cylindrical quadrupole component of the transverse motion of particle sources within a collision. As defined, $v_2(p_t)$ relies on an implicit assumption that almost all produced particles emerge from a single source. This article describes a detailed study of the algebraic structure of $v_2(p_t)$. A procedure is developed to derive a common monopole boost (radial flow) value and quadrupole $p_t$ spectra for several hadron species. The method is applied to $v_2(p_t)$ data for three hadron species from 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb collisions. According to available $v_2(p_t)$ data the assumption of a single dominant particle source within A-A collisions is unjustified. Combined with a previous study of quadrupole amplitude variation for 200 GeV $p$-$p$ collisions these results demonstrate that quadrupole structure is related to a novel QCD process separate from projectile-nucleon dissociation and jet production. Given quadrupole evolution it is unlikely that a hydrodynamic description is relevant to that process.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the algebraic structure of v2(pt) for identified hadrons in 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb collisions. It develops a procedure to extract a single common monopole boost (radial flow) parameter together with species-specific quadrupole pt spectra from the measured v2(pt) data for three hadron species. The central claim is that these data demonstrate the single-source assumption is unjustified; combined with prior p-p results, the quadrupole is attributed to a novel QCD process separate from nucleon dissociation or jets, rendering hydrodynamic descriptions unlikely.

Significance. If the decomposition procedure can be shown to be algebraically unique without additional spectral-shape assumptions or circularity, the result would challenge the hydrodynamic interpretation of elliptic flow and motivate alternative models for the quadrupole component. The approach of deriving quadrupole spectra directly from data is potentially valuable for distinguishing mechanisms, but its impact depends on demonstrating that the extracted quantities are independent predictions rather than reparameterizations of the input v2(pt).

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the described algebraic structure: the procedure extracts a common monopole boost from the same v2(pt) data used to obtain the quadrupole spectra. Without explicit equations showing that the three datasets overconstrain the system sufficiently to eliminate degeneracies when the single-source assumption is relaxed, the decomposition risks being underdetermined or circular, as noted in the stress-test concern.
  2. [Abstract] The claim that v2(pt) data for three species suffice to demonstrate the single-source assumption is unjustified depends on the uniqueness of the common-boost + species-quadrupole decomposition. The manuscript provides no algebraic proof or validation that this inversion is unique without imposing functional forms (e.g., Boltzmann or power-law spectra) for the quadrupole components.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'quadrupole pt spectra' but does not define the precise relation between the extracted spectra and the measured v2(pt) ratios; a short section or appendix with the defining equations would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major concerns regarding the algebraic structure and uniqueness of the decomposition procedure below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the described algebraic structure: the procedure extracts a common monopole boost from the same v2(pt) data used to obtain the quadrupole spectra. Without explicit equations showing that the three datasets overconstrain the system sufficiently to eliminate degeneracies when the single-source assumption is relaxed, the decomposition risks being underdetermined or circular, as noted in the stress-test concern.

    Authors: We agree that explicit demonstration of the overconstraint is essential. The manuscript describes the procedure but does not present the full algebraic system. In the revision we will add a dedicated section deriving the equations for the three hadron species under the two-component model. This will show that the single common boost parameter together with the three independent quadrupole spectra are determined from the three v2(pt) datasets, with the extra constraints eliminating degeneracies without circularity or additional assumptions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The claim that v2(pt) data for three species suffice to demonstrate the single-source assumption is unjustified depends on the uniqueness of the common-boost + species-quadrupole decomposition. The manuscript provides no algebraic proof or validation that this inversion is unique without imposing functional forms (e.g., Boltzmann or power-law spectra) for the quadrupole components.

    Authors: The quadrupole spectra are extracted bin-by-bin after isolating the contribution of the common monopole boost; no functional forms are imposed on the quadrupole components. Uniqueness follows from the requirement that one boost value must simultaneously satisfy all three species. In the revision we will include an algebraic demonstration that the inversion is unique under the relaxed single-source model, confirming that the data structure itself determines the solution without presupposed spectral shapes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Common monopole boost fitted to v2(pt) data defines the extracted quadrupole spectra by construction

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "A procedure is developed to derive a common monopole boost (radial flow) value and quadrupole p_t spectra for several hadron species. The method is applied to v_2(p_t) data for three hadron species from 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb collisions. According to available v_2(p_t) data the assumption of a single dominant particle source within A-A collisions is unjustified."

    The common boost is obtained by fitting the same v2(pt) datasets that are then decomposed into quadrupole spectra. The decomposition equations express each species' quadrupole component in terms of the fitted boost and the measured total yields, so the extracted spectra are fixed once the boost is chosen; they do not supply independent evidence against the single-source premise.

full rationale

The paper develops an algebraic decomposition of v2(pt) into a shared radial-flow boost plus species-specific quadrupole spectra, then applies it to the same 2.76 TeV Pb-Pb identified-hadron data. Because the boost parameter is determined from those data and the quadrupole component is defined relative to the boost via the decomposition equations, the resulting spectra are a reparameterization of the input v2(pt) ratios rather than an independent test of the single-source assumption. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern and supports the reader's circularity score of 6. The central claim that the data demonstrate the single-source assumption is unjustified therefore rests on a quantity that is algebraically tied to the fit itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on an algebraic decomposition whose validity is asserted without external benchmarks or independent verification; the common boost value functions as a fitted parameter extracted from the same dataset.

free parameters (1)
  • common monopole boost value
    Extracted as part of the decomposition procedure from the v2(pt) data for the three hadron species.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption v2(pt) possesses an algebraic structure that permits unique separation into a common radial boost and species-dependent quadrupole spectra
    Invoked as the basis for the entire derivation method.
invented entities (1)
  • quadrupole component arising from a novel QCD process no independent evidence
    purpose: To account for the observed v2(pt) structure once the single-source assumption is dropped
    Introduced to interpret the derived spectra after the decomposition; no independent falsifiable signature outside the present analysis is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1460 out tokens · 58679 ms · 2026-05-17T00:04:20.719745+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    amplitude

    Those results may be compared with T2≈ 93 MeV and n2≈ 14 for 200 GeV pion data from Fig. 3 (solid squares, inverted triangles and thin solid curve) rescaled to match 2.76 TeV results at low mt. The dashed curve is proportional to pion SP soft component ˆS0(mt) for 2.76 TeVp-p collisions [17] plotted in the boost frame for comparison. The quadrupole spectr...

    work page

  2. [2]

    non- flow

    That implies AQ data from those previous studies require a factor 2· 2π and v2 data require a factor √ 2 to compare with LHC data. Data from those cited references are updated accordingly where used in the present study. Fig. 12 shows examples of fit decomposition and resid- uals using 200 GeV p-p correlation data as described in Ref. [9] from the first (a,...

    work page

  3. [3]

    mass ordering

    Radial boost kinematics The four-momentum components of a boosted source are first related to transverse rapidity yt. The boost dis- tribution is assumed to be a single value ∆ yt for sim- plicity. The particle four-momentum components are mt = mi cosh(yt) and pt = mi sinh(yt). The source four-velocity (boost) components areγt = cosh(∆yt) and γtβt = sinh(∆...

    work page

  4. [4]

    bulk medium

    Radial-boost models In high-energy nuclear collisions there are at least two possibilities for the radial-boost model: (a) a monolithic, thermalized collectively-flowing hadron source (“bulk medium”) with complex transverse flow (source-boost) distribution on space (r,φ ) dominated by monopole (radius-dependent Hubble-like expansion) and quadrupole (ellipti...

    work page

  5. [5]

    J. Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Rev. D 46, 229-245 (1992)

    work page 1992

  6. [6]

    Gyulassy and L

    M. Gyulassy and L. McLerran, Nucl. Phys. A 750, 30 (2005)

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    Hirano and M

    T. Hirano and M. Gyulassy, Nucl. Phys. A 769, 71 (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    L. P. Csernai, J. I. Kapusta and L. D. McLerran, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 152303 (2006)

    work page 2006

  9. [9]

    Teaney, J

    D. Teaney, J. Lauret and E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4783 (2001)

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    Huovinen and P

    P. Huovinen and P. V. Ruuskanen, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 56, 163 (2006)

    work page 2006

  11. [11]

    Adams et al

    J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 73, 064907 (2006)

    work page 2006

  12. [12]

    T. A. Trainor, J. Phys. G 40, 055104 (2013)

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    T. A. Trainor and D. J. Prindle, Phys. Rev. D93, 014031 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Agakishiev, et al

    G. Agakishiev, et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 86, 064902 (2012)

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    D. T. Kettler (STAR collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 62, 175 (2009)

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    T. A. Trainor, D. T. Kettler, D. J. Prindle and R. L. Ray, J. Phys. G 42, 025102 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    D. T. Kettler, D. J. Prindle and T. A. Trainor, Phys. Rev. C 91, 064910 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    T. A. Trainor, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23, 569 (2008)

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    T. A. Trainor, J. Phys. G 37, 085004 (2010)

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    T. A. Trainor, Phys. Rev. C 92, 024915 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    T. A. Trainor, J. Phys. G 44, no.7, 075008 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    T. A. Trainor, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 17, 1499 (2008)

    work page 2008

  23. [23]

    T. A. Trainor, Phys. Rev. C 78, 064908 (2008)

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    Becattini, M

    F. Becattini, M. Gazdzicki and J. Sollfrank, Eur. Phys. J. C 5, 143 (1998)

    work page 1998

  25. [25]

    B. B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration), JHEP 1506, 190 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Cooper and G

    F. Cooper and G. Frye, Phys. Rev. D 10, 186 (1974)

    work page 1974

  27. [27]

    T. A. Trainor, J. Phys. G 47, no.4, 045104 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Adams et al

    J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 74, 032006 (2006)

    work page 2006

  29. [29]

    Adler et al

    C. Adler et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 66, 034904 (2002)

    work page 2002

  30. [30]

    Adams et al

    J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 052302 (2004)

    work page 2004

  31. [31]

    B. I. Abelev et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 77, 054901 (2008)

    work page 2008

  32. [32]

    Romatschke and U

    P. Romatschke and U. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 172301 (2007)

    work page 2007

  33. [33]

    H. Song, S. A. Bass, U. Heinz, T. Hirano and C. Shen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 192301 (2011) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 139904 (2012)]

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    B. I. Abelev et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. C 77, 054901 (2008)

    work page 2008

  35. [35]

    Adams et al

    J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 72, 014904 (2005)

    work page 2005

  36. [36]

    Aamodt et al

    K. Aamodt et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252302 (2010)

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    T. A. Trainor, arXiv:1801.05862

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Adam et al

    J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 93, no. 3, 034913 (2016)

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    R. C. Hwa et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 024905 (2004)

    work page 2004

  40. [40]

    R. J. Fries et al., Phys. Rev. C 68, 044902 (2003)

    work page 2003

  41. [41]

    Greco et al., Phys

    V. Greco et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 202302 (2003)

    work page 2003

  42. [42]

    Khachatryan et al

    V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS), JHEP 09, 091 (2010)

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    T. A. Trainor, Phys. Rev. C 90, no. 2, 024909 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Aamodt et al

    K. Aamodt et al. (ALICE), Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 032301 (2011)

    work page 2011

  45. [45]

    T. A. Trainor, arXiv:2510.05314

    work page arXiv

  46. [46]

    T. A. Trainor, arXiv:1801.06579

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    T. A. Trainor and D. J. Prindle, arXiv:hep-ph/0411217 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    H. H. Gutbrod, K. H. Kampert, B. Kolb, A. M. Poskanzer, H. G. Ritter, R. Schicker and H. R. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. C 42, 640-651 (1990)

    work page 1990

  49. [49]

    Y. L. Dokshitzer and D. E. Kharzeev, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 54, 487 (2004)

    work page 2004

  50. [50]

    T. A. Trainor, Phys. Rev. C 80, 044901 (2009)

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    H. Song, S. Bass and U. W. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C 89, no.3, 034919 (2014)

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    T. A. Trainor, arXiv:2304.02170

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Particle Production in Heavy Ion Collisions

    P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich and J. Stachel, doi:10.1142/9789812795533 0008 [arXiv:nucl-th/0304013 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789812795533

  54. [54]

    T. A. Trainor, Phys. Rev. D 89, 094011 (2014)

    work page 2014

  55. [55]

    Luzum and P

    M. Luzum and P. Romatschke, Phys. Rev. C 78, 034915 (2008)

    work page 2008

  56. [56]

    Abelev et al

    B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. C 88, no. 4, 044909 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    T. A. Trainor, arXiv:1708.09412

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    T. A. Trainor, arXiv:2112.09790

    work page arXiv

  59. [59]

    T. A. Trainor, arXiv:2112.12330

    work page arXiv

  60. [60]

    B. B. Abelev et al. (ALICE), Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 222301 (2013)

    work page 2013