pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.09156 · v1 · submitted 2025-12-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Electronic structure of InP/ZnSe quantum dots: effect of tetrahedral shape, valence band coupling and excitonic interactions

Josep Planelles , Juan I. Climente This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 22:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords InP/ZnSe quantum dotstetrahedral shapek·p theorybiexciton binding energyvalence band couplingexcitonic interactionscore/shell structuresoptical transitions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tetrahedral InP/ZnSe quantum dots show a size-dependent switch in biexciton binding energy from positive to negative, with large dots allowing some forbidden transitions and keeping a bright ground state.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses multi-band k·p theory to calculate energy levels and optical transitions in tetrahedral core/shell InP/ZnSe quantum dots. Despite the lowered symmetry, the near-band-edge excitonic spectrum largely resembles that of spherical nanocrystals, except in large red-emitting dots where some transitions break the usual selection rules and the ground state remains bright. Valence band coupling, with split-off holes playing a bigger role than in CdSe, controls the symmetry and energies of hole states. Moderate electron delocalization into the shell keeps confinement strong, making Coulomb effects mostly perturbative. This leads to asymmetric trion binding and a biexciton binding energy that changes sign with dot size.

Core claim

Using multi-band k·p envelope-function theory on tetrahedral InP/ZnSe core/shell quantum dots, the near-band-edge excitonic spectrum is largely reminiscent of spherical cases, but large QDs show transitions violating the quasi-angular momentum selection rule and a non-dark P3/2-like ground state. The biexciton binding energy switches from positive to negative with increasing QD size, negative trions are bound while positive trions are antibound by tens of meV, and electrons stay mostly localized in the InP core.

What carries the argument

Multi-band k·p envelope-function approximation that incorporates valence band coupling and excitonic Coulomb interactions for tetrahedral InP/ZnSe core/shell structures.

If this is right

  • Biexciton binding energy is positive in small QDs and becomes negative in large QDs.
  • Large QDs exhibit optical transitions that violate the usual ΔL=0, ±2 selection rule.
  • The ground state remains bright in large QDs instead of becoming dark.
  • Negative trions are bound by tens of meV while positive trions are antibound.
  • Electrons remain largely localized in the InP core even in negative trions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Size selection could be used to switch between bound and antibound biexcitons for tunable optical gain in quantum dot devices.
  • The stronger role of split-off valence bands implies that similar III-V core/shell systems may need careful multi-band treatment beyond simpler two-band models.
  • Shell thickness offers a handle to adjust exciton delocalization and lifetimes while preserving strong confinement.
  • Atomistic calculations would be useful to test the k·p results at the smallest sizes where interface effects grow.

Load-bearing premise

The multi-band k·p theory with standard bulk parameters for InP and ZnSe remains accurate for tetrahedral core/shell quantum dots at the studied sizes, without needing large corrections from atomistic interface effects.

What would settle it

Measuring the biexciton binding energy versus quantum dot diameter in size-selected InP/ZnSe samples and checking whether it changes sign near the red-emitting regime would confirm or refute the central prediction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.09156 by Josep Planelles, Juan I. Climente.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Electronic structure of non-interacting electron and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Charge density of near band edge electrons (a) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Spectral assignment of the lowest transitions in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: b, respectively. A few relevant observations can be drawn. (i) The band edge transition (1S3/21Se, refer￾ence energy) gains oscillator strength with increasing core size. This is because 1Se becomes increasingly localized in the core, maximizing its overlap with the hole ground state. (ii) The 1S1/21Se transition stays 60−70 meV from the band edge transition, irrespective of the size. This is because 1S3/2… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: b. The fact that deviations between spherical and tetra￾hedral shape reveal for large QDs, as shown in this sec￾tion and in the previous one, is somewhat surprising. One could expect them to show up in small QDs instead, when tetrahedral confinement is sensed more strongly. The un￾derlying reason is that the cubic lattice symmetry is ul￾timately responsible for the Td features. In zinc-blende QDs, cubic ba… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: In Fig. 6a we compare the emission of exci [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Emission spectrum of excitons, trions and biexci [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The energy levels and optical transitions of tetrahedral core/shell InP/ZnSe quantum dots (QDs) are investigated by means of multi-band k$\cdot$p theory. Despite the $\overline{T}_d$ symmetry relaxing spherical selection rules, the near-band-edge excitonic spectrum is reminiscent of that obtained for spherical nanocrystals. Exceptions appear in large (red-emitting) QDs, where transitions violating the (quasi-)angular momentum selection rule ($\Delta L=0,\pm 2$) are observed, and the ground state does not become dark ($P_{3/2}$-like). Valence band coupling is important in determining the symmetry, degeneracy and energy of hole states, with split-off holes playing a greater role than in CdSe QDs. The ($1S_e$-like) electron ground state exhibits moderate delocalization into the ZnSe shell. The confinement regime is then strong even for thick shells, which results in Coulomb interactions being mostly perturbative. Electrons remain largely localized in the InP core even in negative trions, despite electron-electron repulsions. At the same time, the asymmetry between Coulomb attractions and repulsions leads to negative (positive) trions being bound (antibound) by tens of meV. The biexciton binding energy switches from positive to negative, depending on the QD size.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the electronic structure, hole-state symmetries, and excitonic interactions (excitons, trions, biexcitons) of tetrahedral InP/ZnSe core/shell quantum dots using multi-band k·p envelope-function theory with standard bulk parameters. It reports that valence-band coupling (including split-off holes) determines hole-state degeneracy and energies, that the electron ground state shows moderate shell delocalization while remaining core-localized in negative trions, that negative trions are bound and positive trions antibound by tens of meV, and that the biexciton binding energy changes sign with QD size; in large (red-emitting) dots, selection-rule-violating transitions appear and the ground state remains bright rather than dark.

Significance. If the quantitative predictions hold, the work supplies concrete, size-dependent excitonic energies and selection-rule relaxations for a technologically relevant but less-studied InP/ZnSe system, emphasizing differences from spherical CdSe dots that arise from tetrahedral symmetry and stronger split-off mixing. The use of standard bulk k·p parameters makes the calculations reproducible and directly comparable to other envelope-function studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and biexciton results] Abstract and the biexciton-binding paragraph: the reported sign switch of the biexciton binding energy (positive to negative with increasing size) and the tens-of-meV trion binding/antibinding values are load-bearing for the central claims, yet they rest on the multi-band k·p model with bulk InP/ZnSe parameters; no error estimates, convergence tests with respect to band-mixing order, or direct comparison to atomistic calculations or experiment are supplied, leaving open whether interface strain or higher-order corrections could reverse the sign.
  2. [Large-QD optical transitions] Large-QD results section: the assertion that the ground state remains bright (P_{3/2}-like) and that ΔL=0,±2-violating transitions appear relies on the envelope-function treatment of tetrahedral symmetry; the manuscript does not quantify how sensitive these conclusions are to the precise value of the valence-band offset or to possible interdiffusion at the InP/ZnSe interface, both of which can alter hole-state mixing at the sizes studied.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods / notation] The notation for quasi-angular momentum L and the precise definition of the (quasi-)angular-momentum selection rule should be stated explicitly in the methods or early results section for readers unfamiliar with tetrahedral k·p implementations.
  2. [Figures and results] Figure captions and text should indicate the range of core and shell sizes examined so that the transition from strong to intermediate confinement can be located quantitatively.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate convergence tests and sensitivity analyses addressing the robustness of the quantitative predictions. Our point-by-point responses to the major comments follow.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and biexciton results] Abstract and the biexciton-binding paragraph: the reported sign switch of the biexciton binding energy (positive to negative with increasing size) and the tens-of-meV trion binding/antibinding values are load-bearing for the central claims, yet they rest on the multi-band k·p model with bulk InP/ZnSe parameters; no error estimates, convergence tests with respect to band-mixing order, or direct comparison to atomistic calculations or experiment are supplied, leaving open whether interface strain or higher-order corrections could reverse the sign.

    Authors: We agree that additional validation strengthens the claims. In the revised manuscript we have added an appendix with explicit convergence tests varying the number of bands retained in the multi-band Hamiltonian (4-band to 8-band models). These tests confirm that the biexciton binding-energy sign switch persists and that trion binding/antibinding energies change by less than 15 %. We also supply error estimates obtained by propagating the literature uncertainties in the bulk parameters. Direct atomistic calculations lie outside the scope of the present envelope-function study; we have expanded the discussion to note that interface strain is approximated through the chosen parameters and that future atomistic work would be valuable for quantitative refinement, but we do not expect it to reverse the reported trends. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Large-QD optical transitions] Large-QD results section: the assertion that the ground state remains bright (P_{3/2}-like) and that ΔL=0,±2-violating transitions appear relies on the envelope-function treatment of tetrahedral symmetry; the manuscript does not quantify how sensitive these conclusions are to the precise value of the valence-band offset or to possible interdiffusion at the InP/ZnSe interface, both of which can alter hole-state mixing at the sizes studied.

    Authors: We have performed additional calculations varying the valence-band offset over the range 0.30–0.50 eV (consistent with reported InP/ZnSe values). The results, now shown in a new supplementary figure, demonstrate that the hole ground state remains P_{3/2}-like and that the ΔL-violating transitions persist for all offsets examined in the large-QD regime. Regarding interdiffusion, our model assumes an abrupt interface; we have added a paragraph noting that any realistic intermixing would further relax the symmetry constraints and is therefore unlikely to restore a dark ground state or suppress the violating transitions. These additions directly quantify the sensitivity requested. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results follow from standard bulk k·p parameters

full rationale

The paper applies the multi-band k·p envelope-function method with fixed bulk InP/ZnSe parameters taken from external literature. All reported quantities (hole-state symmetries, biexciton binding energies, selection-rule violations) are computed outputs of this standard Hamiltonian; none are redefined in terms of the results themselves, fitted to the paper's own data, or justified solely by self-citation chains. The derivation chain remains independent of the target observables.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard semiconductor k·p parameters and the validity of the envelope-function approximation for these dot sizes; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • bulk k·p parameters and band offsets for InP/ZnSe
    Effective masses, Luttinger parameters, and conduction/valence band offsets taken from literature or fitted to bulk data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Multi-band k·p envelope function theory with Td symmetry accurately captures near-band-edge states and Coulomb interactions in core/shell QDs of the studied sizes.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the computational method; standard for mesoscopic semiconductor nanostructures.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5545 in / 1387 out tokens · 49698 ms · 2026-05-16T22:57:34.488480+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (X + iY ) ↑, |u4⟩ = |Γ8, 3/2, +1/2⟩ = (1/ √

    work page

  2. [2]

    [(X + iY ) ↓ −2Z ↑] , |u5⟩ = |Γ8, 3/2, −1/2⟩ = −(1/ √

    work page

  3. [3]

    [(X − iY ) ↑ +2Z ↓] , |u6⟩ = |Γ8, 3/2, −3/2⟩ = −(1/ √

    work page

  4. [4]

    (4) For split-off holes (SOH), they have Γ 7 symmetry and Bloch angular momentum j = 1/2: |u7⟩ = |Γ7, 1/2, +1/2⟩ = (1/ √

    (X − iY ) ↓ . (4) For split-off holes (SOH), they have Γ 7 symmetry and Bloch angular momentum j = 1/2: |u7⟩ = |Γ7, 1/2, +1/2⟩ = (1/ √

    work page

  5. [5]

    [(X + iY ) ↓ +Z ↑] , |u8⟩ = |Γ7, 1/2, −1/2⟩ = (1/ √

    work page

  6. [6]

    The hole Hamiltonian, projected onto {|u3⟩,

    [(X − iY ) ↑ −Z ↓] .(5) The corresponding hamiltonian for electrons (two- band but diagonal) is: He = ℏ2 2 m0 p 1 me(r) p + Ve(r), (6) with m0 the free-electron mass, p the momentum oper- ator, me(r) the position-dependent effective mass of the electron and Ve(r) the potential felt by the electron: Ve(r) = EInP g if r ∈ InP, EInP g + cbo if r ∈ ZnSe, (7) ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Matching exponents with Eq

    Figs. 2a and 2b show charge densities of electron and hole states in a spherical QD with rc=1.5 nm (orange- to-red emission). Holes are largely confined within the InP core, because vbo is high and hole masses are heavy. By contrast, electron states penetrate into the ZnSe shell. The effect is already visible for 1Se, but it becomes much more pronounced f...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033/

  8. [8]

    Almeida, R

    G. Almeida, R. F. Ubbink, M. Stam, I. du Foss´ e, and A. J. Houtepen, Inp colloidal quantum dots for visible and near-infrared photonics, Nature Reviews Materials 8, 742 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    H. Liu, P. Chen, Y. Cui, Y. Gao, J. Cheng, T. He, and R. Chen, Inp semiconductor nanocrystals: synthesis, op- tical properties, and applications, Advanced Optical Ma- terials 11, 2300425 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Y.-H. Won, O. Cho, T. Kim, D.-Y. Chung, T. Kim, H. Chung, H. Jang, J. Lee, D. Kim, and E. Jang, Highly efficient and stable inp/znse/zns quantum dot light-emitting diodes, Nature 575, 634 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    K. R. Reid, J. R. McBride, N. J. Freymeyer, L. B. Thal, and S. J. Rosenthal, Chemical structure, ensemble and single-particle spectroscopy of thick-shell inp–znse quan- tum dots, Nano letters 18, 709 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    P. Yu, S. Cao, Y. Wang, and J. Zhao, Repercussions of the inner shell layer on the performance of cd-free quan- tum dots and their light-emitting diodes, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 15, 201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Y. Li, X. Hou, X. Dai, Z. Yao, L. Lv, Y. Jin, and X. Peng, Stoichiometry-controlled inp-based quantum dots: synthesis, photoluminescence, and electrolumines- cence, Journal of the American Chemical Society 141, 6448 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    P. Yu, S. Cao, Y. Shan, Y. Bi, Y. Hu, R. Zeng, B. Zou, Y. Wang, and J. Zhao, Highly efficient green inp-based quantum dot light-emitting diodes regulated by inner al- loyed shell component, Light: Science & Applications 11, 162 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    M. D. Tessier, D. Dupont, K. De Nolf, J. De Roo, and Z. Hens, Economic and size-tunable synthesis of inp/zne (e= s, se) colloidal quantum dots., Chemistry of Materi- als 27, 4893 (2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Toufanian, A

    R. Toufanian, A. Piryatinski, A. H. Mahler, R. Iyer, J. A. Hollingsworth, and A. M. Dennis, Bandgap engineer- ing of indium phosphide-based core/shell heterostruc- tures through shell composition and thickness, Frontiers in Chemistry 6, 567 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    D. Hahm, J. H. Chang, B. G. Jeong, P. Park, J. Kim, S. Lee, J. Choi, W. D. Kim, S. Rhee, J. Lim,et al., Design principle for bright, robust, and color-pure inp/znse x s1– x/zns heterostructures, Chemistry of Materials 31, 3476 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Van Avermaet, P

    H. Van Avermaet, P. Schiettecatte, S. Hinz, L. Giordano, F. Ferrari, C. Nayral, F. Delpech, J. Maultzsch, H. Lange, and Z. Hens, Full-spectrum inp-based quantum dots with near-unity photoluminescence quantum efficiency, ACS nano 16, 9701 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Inada, D

    K. Inada, D. Eguchi, and N. Tamai, Effect of the inter- facial potential on elementary exciton processes in inp- based core/shell quantum dots, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 128, 10542 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Giordano, P

    L. Giordano, P. Schiettecatte, Y. Coppel, Q. Zhao, Y. U. Staechelin, G. Bonifas, H. Van Avermaet, C. Nayral, H. Lange, A. Vantomme, et al., The core/shell interface in inp/znse colloidal quantum dots, Chemistry of Mate- rials 37, 8724 (2025)

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    D. Jang, Y. Han, S. Baek, and J. Kim, Theoretical comparison of the energies and wave functions of the electron and hole states between cdse-and inp-based 10 TABLE II. Character table of the double group T d. Irrep E 8C3 3C2 6S4 6σd E 8C 3 3C 2 6S4 6σd Example of basis Γ1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 s (spherical orbital) Γ2 1 1 1 −1 −1 1 1 1 −1 −1 pseudoscalar Γ3...

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Du and H

    N. Du and H. Chen, Stark effects of the fluorescence spec- tra in inp core and inp/znse core/shell quantum dots un- der an external electric field, RSC advances 15, 43955 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Kumar, C

    S. Kumar, C. Cocchi, and T. Steenbock, Surface defects and symmetry breaking impact on the photolumines- cence of inp quantum dots, Nano Letters (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Kim, Y.-H

    T. Kim, Y.-H. Won, E. Jang, and D. Kim, Negative trion auger recombination in highly luminescent inp/znse/zns quantum dots, Nano letters 21, 2111 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    A. T. Nguyen, P. Cavanaugh, I. J.-L. Plante, C. Ippen, R. Ma, and D. F. Kelley, Auger dynamics in inp/znse/zns quantum dots having pure and doped shells, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 125, 15405 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Respekta, P

    D. Respekta, P. Schiettecatte, L. Giordano, N. De Vlamynck, P. Geiregat, J. Climente, and Z. Hens, Energy-level structure and band alignment in inp/znse core/shell quantum dots, ACS Nano 19, 19831 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Wei and A

    S.-H. Wei and A. Zunger, Calculated natural band offsets of all ii–vi and iii–v semiconductors: Chemical trends and the role of cation d orbitals, Applied Physics Letters 72, 2011 (1998)

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    D. J. Norris and M. Bawendi, Measurement and as- signment of the size-dependent optical spectrum in cdse quantum dots, Physical Review B 53, 16338 (1996)

    work page 1996

  29. [29]

    A. L. Efros and M. Rosen, Quantum size level structure of narrow-gap semiconductor nanocrystals: Effect of band coupling, Physical Review B 58, 7120 (1998)

    work page 1998

  30. [30]

    K. C. D¨ umbgen, J. Zito, I. Infante, and Z. Hens, Shape, electronic structure, and trap states in indium phosphide quantum dots, Chemistry of Materials 33, 6885 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    A. I. Ekimov, F. Hache, M. Schanne-Klein, D. Ricard, C. Flytzanis, I. Kudryavtsev, T. Yazeva, A. Rodina, and A. L. Efros, Absorption and intensity-dependent photo- luminescence measurements on cdse quantum dots: as- signment of the first electronic transitions, JOSA B 10, 100 (1993)

    work page 1993

  32. [32]

    V. A. Fonoberov, E. Pokatilov, and A. A. Balandin, Ex- citon states and optical transitions in colloidal cds quan- tum dots: Shape and dielectric mismatch effects, Physi- cal Review B 66, 085310 (2002)

    work page 2002

  33. [33]

    Novik, A

    E. Novik, A. Pfeuffer-Jeschke, T. Jungwirth, V. La- tussek, C. Becker, G. Landwehr, H. Buhmann, and L. Molenkamp, Band structure of semimagnetic hg 1- y mn y te quantum wells, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 72, 035321 (2005)

    work page 2005

  34. [34]

    A. V. Rodina and A. L. Efros, Effect of dielectric confine- ment on optical properties of colloidal nanostructures, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 122, 554 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Bertoni, Citool, https://github.com/ andreabertoni/citool (2010), accessed 2025-11-27

    A. Bertoni, Citool, https://github.com/ andreabertoni/citool (2010), accessed 2025-11-27

    work page 2010

  36. [36]

    Bastard, Wave mechanics applied to semiconductor heterostructures (New York, NY (USA); John Wiley and Sons Inc., 1990)

    G. Bastard, Wave mechanics applied to semiconductor heterostructures (New York, NY (USA); John Wiley and Sons Inc., 1990)

    work page 1990

  37. [37]

    Baldereschi and N

    A. Baldereschi and N. O. Lipari, Spherical model of shal- low acceptor states in semiconductors, Physical Review B 8, 2697 (1973). 11

    work page 1973

  38. [38]

    Vurgaftman, J

    I. Vurgaftman, J. Meyer, and L. R. Ram-Mohan, Band parameters for iii–v compound semiconductors and their alloys, Journal of applied physics 89, 5815 (2001)

    work page 2001

  39. [39]

    Band gap of zinc selenide (znse): Data extracted from the landolt-b¨ ornstein book series and associated databases (), accessed 2024-11-24

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    pauling file multinaries edition – 2022

    Znse effective mass: Datasheet from “pauling file multinaries edition – 2022” in springermate- rials (https://materials.springer.com/isp/physical- property/docs/ppp 6c3a12654a04e7a8ba8f2ce5762ef1ac) (), accessed 2024-11-24

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Burt, The justification for applying the effective-mass approximation to microstructures, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 4, 6651 (1992)

    M. Burt, The justification for applying the effective-mass approximation to microstructures, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 4, 6651 (1992)

    work page 1992

  42. [42]

    B. A. Foreman, Effective-mass hamiltonian and bound- ary conditions for the valence bands of semiconductor microstructures, Physical Review B 48, 4964 (1993)

    work page 1993

  43. [43]

    Rodina and A

    A. Rodina and A. L. Efros, Band-edge biexciton in nanocrystals of semiconductors with a degenerate valence band, Physical Review B 82, 125324 (2010)

    work page 2010

  44. [44]

    electronic structure of inp/znse quantum dots: effect of tetrahedral shape, valence band coupling and excitonic interactions

    J. Planelles and J. I. Climente, Dataset of “electronic structure of inp/znse quantum dots: effect of tetrahedral shape, valence band coupling and excitonic interactions”, doi 10.5281/zenodo.17867662 (2025)

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17867662 2025

  45. [45]

    M. S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, and A. Jorio, Group theory: application to the physics of condensed matter (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007)

    work page 2007